Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Introduction to
Axiomatic Design
Male connector
Compliant pin
(for permanent connection)
Plastic
overmolding
Female connector
Plastic
overmolding
{CAs}
{FRs}
Mapping
Customer domain
{DP}
Mapping
Functional domain
{PVs}
Mapping
Physical domain
Process domain
Customer Domain
{CAs}
Functional Domain
{FRs}
Manufacturing
Attributes which
consumers desire
Materials
Desired performance
Functional
requirements
specified for the
product
Required Properties
Physical variables
which can satisfy the
functional
requirements
Micro-structure
Processes
Software
Attributes desired in
the software
Output Spec of
Program codes
Input Variables or
Algorithms Modules
Program codes
Sub-routines machine
codes compilers
modules
Organization
Customer satisfaction
Functions of the
organization
Programs or Offices
or Activities
Systems
Attribute desired of
the overall system
Functional
requirements of the
system
Machines or
components,
sub-components
Resources (human,
financial, materials,
etc.)
Business
ROI
Business goals
Business structure
Definitions
Axiom:
Corollary:
Inference derived from axioms or propositions
that follow from axioms or other propositions
that have been proven.
Definitions - contd
Functional Requirement:
Functional requirements (FRs) are a minimum set of
independent requirements that completely
characterizes the functional needs of the product (or
software, organizations, systems, etc.) in the
functional domain. By definition, each FR is
independent of every other FR at the time the FRs are
established.
Constraint:
Constraints (Cs) are bounds on acceptable solutions.
There are two kinds of constraints: input constraints
and system constraints. Input constraints are
imposed as part of the design specifications. System
constraints are constraints imposed by the system in
which the design solution must function.
Definitions - contd
Design parameter:
Design parameters (DPs) are the key physical
(or other equivalent terms in the case of
software design, etc.) variables in the physical
domain that characterize the design that
satisfies the specified FRs.
Process variable:
Process variables (PVs) are the key variables
(or other equivalent term in the case of
software design, etc.) in the process domain
that characterizes the process that can
generate the specified DPs.
Axiom 2:
of
the
functional
the can
See Example 1.3 in [Suh 2001].
Design Matrix
The relationship between {FRs} and {DPs} can be
written as
{FRs}=[A] {DPs}
When the above equation is written in a differential
form as
{dFRs}=[A] {dDPs}
[A] is defined as the Design Matrix given by
elements :
Aij = FRi/DPi
Example
For a matrix A:
A11 A12 A13
[ A] = A21 A22 A23
A31 A32 A33
(1.3)
Uncoupled Design
A11 0
[ A] = 0 A22
0
0
0
0
A33
(1.4)
Decoupled Design
0
A11 0
[A] = A21 A22 0
A31 A32 A33
Coupled Design
All other design matrices
(1.5)
Design of Processes
{DPs}=[B] {PVs}
FR1
FR11
FR111
DP1
FR12
FR112
FR121
FR122
DP11
DP111
DP112
Physical
Domain
Domain
{FR}
Mapping
{DP}
Decomposition Zigzagging
DP12
DP121
DP122
:
Independence Axiom
Maintain the independence of FRs
Information Axiom
Minimize the information content
Design Axioms
Independence Axiom: Maintain the independence of FRs
O DP1
X DP 2
FR1 X
=
FR 2 O
FR1 X
=
FR 2 X
Uncoupled
O DP1
X DP 2
FR1 X
=
FR 2 X
Decoupled
X DP1
X DP 2
Coupled
p.d.f.
f(FR)
FR
Common
Range, AC
DP
System Range,
p.d.f. f(FR)
FR
DP
drl
dru
|sr|
FR
FR
FR
DP
DP
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
DP
DP
DP
DP
DP
DP
DP
Prob.
Density
Design
range
FR
Prob.
Density
Design
range
System
range
FR
Probab.
Density
Target
Bias
Syst em
Rang e
Design Rang e
Area o f
Common
Rang e (Ac)
Variation
from t he
peak valu e
FR
Pro b. De n s i ty
Pro b. De n s ity
De si g n
Ra n ge
De si g n
Ra n g e
Sy ste m
Ra n g e
FR1
Syste m
Ra n ge
FR2
FR2
A22
= 0
FR3 0
0
FR1
DP1 =
A11
FR2
DP2 =
A22
FR3
DP3 =
A33
0 DP1
0 DP2
A33 DP3
Decoupled
FR1 A11
0
FR2 = A21 A22
FR3 A31 A32
DP1 =
DP 2 =
DP3 =
DP1
DP2
A33 DP3
0
0
FR1
A11
FR 2 A21 DP1
A22
FR3 A31 DP1 A32 DP 2
A33
Injection
molded knob
Shaft
with flat
milled
surface
Section A-A
Injecti on
molded k nob
Shaft
with flat
mi lled
surface
M ill ed Flat
En d o f th e
sh af t
Slot
M ill ed Flat
En d o f th e
sh af t
Me tal
Sh af t
In jec tio n
m old ed
nylo n K n ob
(b)
(a)
Se cti on view A A
History
Goal
To establish the science base
for areas such as design and
manufacturing
Axiomatic approach
Algorithmic approach
References
N. P. Suh, Axiomatic Design: Advances
and Applications. New York: Oxford
University Press, 2001
N. P. Suh, The Principles of Design. New
York: Oxford University Press, 1990
Axiomatic Design
Axiomatic Design
Axiomatic Design
Axioms
Corollaries
Theorems
Applications
manufacturing,
--
hardware,
materials, etc.
System design
Complexity
software,
Introduction
Stack of modules
Track
Robot
Loading
Station
Stack of modules
Unloading
station
System integration
Stack of modules
S tac k o f mo du l e s
Track
Robot
Loading
Station
Stack of modules
Mac
hi ne A
S tac k o f mo du l e s
Mac hi ne B
Introduction (contd)
Example1
Light
Original
image
Image is
created here
Selenium
coated Al.
cylinder
Paper
Feed Roll
Paper
Wiper
Roll
Toner
container
Toner is coated
on surfaces of
Selenium with
electric charges
Definition of Design
Design is an interplay between
what we want to achieve and
how we want to achieve them.
Definition of Design
"What
we want
to
achieve"
"How
we want
to
achieve
them"
Constraints
What are constraints?
Constraints provide the bounds on the
acceptable design solutions and differ from
the FRs in that they do not have to be
independent.
There are two kinds of constraints:
input constraints
system constraints.
Fixed set of
counter-rotating
grooved rollers
1= 2
2
Tube between
the two rollers
Pivot
axis 1
1< 2
See Example 1.6 in [Suh 2001].
Flexible set of
counter-rotating
grooved rollers
for bending
1= 2
2
Tube between
the two rollers
Pivot
axis 1
1<2
Flexible set of
counter-rotating
grooved rollers
for bending
Sensitivity (mm/mm)
3.29
3.74
6.32
1.48
6.55
5.94
11.72
10.17
12.06
3.71
DP
FR
FR1
DP1
FR2
FR11
FR12
FR121
FR122
FR123
FR1231
Functional Domain
FR1232
DP2
DP11
DP12
DP121
DP122
DP123
DP1231
DP1232
Physical Domain
Zigzagging to decompose in the functional and the physical domains and create
Identical Design:
When two different designs satisfy the same set
of FRs and have the identical design
architecture, the designs are defined to be
identical designs.
X 0 DP 1
FR 1
0 X DP 2
FR 2
FR22
FR21
DP22
DP21
X
X
0
X
DP2
DP1
____________________________________________________
DP12 DP11 DP13 DP22 DP21
____________________________________________________
FR21 X
0
0
0
0
FR1
FR11 X
X
0
0
0
FR13 X
0
X
0
0
_____________________________________________________
FR2 FR22 0
0
0
X
0
FR21 0
0
0
X
X
_____________________________________________
DP2
DP1
____________________________________________________
DP12 DP11 DP13
DP22
DP21
____________________________________________________
FR12
X
0
0
0
0
FR1
FR11
X
X
0
0
0
FR13
X
0
X
0
0
_____________________________________________________
FR2 FR22
X
0
0
0
0
FR21
0
0
0
X
0/X
_____________________________________________
Analysis
[A ]
[B]
1. Bot h d iago n al
[\ ]
[\ ]
[\]
2. D i ag x Fu ll
[\ ]
[X]
[X]
3. D i ag x tria n g .
[\ ]
[LT]
[LT]
[LT]
[LT]
[LT]
[LT]
[U T]
[X]
6. Fu l l x Fu ll
[X]
[X]
[X]
I
= log2
= log2 P
n
1
I = log 2
=
log 2 Pi
P
i=
1
i =
1
Probab.
Den sity
Tar get
Bi a s
Syst em
Rang e
Design Rang e
Area o f
Com m on
Rang e ( Ac)
Varia tion
from t he
pe a k valu e
FR
Asr
I = log 2
Acr
(1.9)
where Asr denotes the area under the System Range and Acr is the area of
the Common Range.
Furthermore, since Asr = 1.0 in most cases (since the total area of the
probability distribution function is equal to the total probability, which is
one) and there are n FRs to satisfy, the information content may be
expressed as
n
I = log 2
i=1
1
Acr
(1.10)
FR1=Comm.
time [min]
20 to40
20 to 30
25 to45
FR2=Quality
of school [%]
50 to70
50 to 75
50 to80
FR3=Quality
of air [days]
300 to 320
340 to 350
350 and up
FR4=Price [$]
450k to 550k
$450k to 650k
$600k to800k
Solution
Prob.
Dist.
Design Range
Common
Range
System
Range
10
20
30
40
Prob.
Dist.
Design Range
System Range
Common Range
20
40
60
80
Quality of
School (%)
I1
I2
I3
[bits]
[bits]
[bits]
1.0
2.0 Infi nite
0
1.32
0
2.0
1.0
0
I4
I
[bits]
[bits]
0
Infini te
0
1.32
2.0 5.0
iii.
iv.