Professional Documents
Culture Documents
U 2
a ) Similarity variable defined as: = y
n x
'
From Eq. (12): u = Uf ( )
1
u
U 2
=
=
shear stress
Uf "( )
n
x
1
1
2
2
U
U
=
Uf "( )
wall shear stress w =
0.332 U
n x
n x
=0
f "( )
=
w 0.332
where f "( ) is given for various in Blasius solution
From Blasius solution, u/U = 0.99 when = 5; that is: y = at = 5
y
=
Or
5
y/
Plot of /w
versus y/
2
1.5
1
0.5
0
0.0000
0.2000
0.4000
0.6000
0.8000
1.0000
1.2000
/w
nU 2
b) From
=
Eq.(13) : v
[ f ( ) f( ) ]
4x
v
1
=
[ f ( ) f( )]
U 2 Re x
1.8
1.6
1.4
1.2
1
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
0.0000000.0005000.0010000.0015000.0020000.0025000.003000
y/
v/U
u
u
+v
x
y
u u
from p. 47:
Subst. u, v from Eqns (12) & (13) and
,
x y
c) From Eq. (9), acceleration a x = u
U
nU 2
U 2
a x = Uf ( )
f '' ( ) +
[ f ( ) f( ) ] U f '' ( )
2 x
4x
n x
U 2
=
f( ) f '' ( )
2x
'
f f
0.25
0.2
0.15
0.1
0.05
0
0
X
2
10
U2
x
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
5.5
6
6.5
7
7.5
8
f
0
0.0415
0.1656
0.3701
0.65
0.9963
1.3968
1.8377
2.3057
2.7901
3.2833
3.7806
4.2796
4.7793
5.2792
5.7792
6.2792
f'
0
0.1659
0.3298
0.4868
0.6298
0.7513
0.846
0.913
0.9555
0.9795
0.9915
0.9969
0.999
0.9997
0.9999
1
1
y/
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
f''
0.3321
0.3309
0.323
0.3026
0.2668
0.2174
0.1614
0.1078
0.0642
0.034
0.0159
0.0066
0.0024
0.0008
0.0002
0.0001
0
/w
1.0003
0.9967
0.9729
0.9114
0.8036
0.6548
0.4861
0.3247
0.1934
0.1024
0.0479
0.0199
0.0072
0.0024
0.0006
0.0003
0.0000
v/U
0.000000
0.000066
0.000260
0.000569
0.000964
0.001394
0.001804
0.002147
0.002397
0.002558
0.002647
0.002692
0.002711
0.002718
0.002720
0.002721
0.002721
f f ''
0.0000
0.0137
0.0535
0.1120
0.1734
0.2166
0.2254
0.1981
0.1480
0.0949
0.0522
0.0250
0.0103
0.0038
0.0011
0.0006
0.0000
2. A thin flat plate, L = 0.25 m long and b = 1 m wide, is installed in a water tunnel as a splitter.
The freestream speed is U = 1.75 m/s, and the velocity profile in the boundary layer is given
by the Blasius solution. The kinematic viscosity of water is 10-6 m2/s. Evaluate the momentum
thickness L and the total drag on both sides.
UL 1.75 0.25
=
= 4.38 105
6
n
10
which justify assumption that the boundary layer is laminar for the entire length
Renolds number Re
=
L
0.664 0.25
0.664
Re x
= 0.251x103
4.38 10
D= r bU q = 103 11.752 0.251x103= 0.766 N
5
shape of plate is x = y 2 / 25
( 25 / 2 )
length is L=
25
cm=6.25 cm =0.0625 m
UL 7.5 0.0625
=
= 3.125 x104
5
1.5 x 10
n
which justify assumption of laminar
Reynolds number Re
=
L
r
x
Drag D = w w( x)dx
area
Drag D =
0.332U
0
3/2
r
x
x
L
x
dx
L
=0.332 U 3/2 r n W
1
L
0.332 r W n LU 3
[ x ]0 =
L
4. Assume laminar boundary-layer flow to estimate the drag (both sides) on four square plates
(each 7.5 cm x 7.5 cm) placed parallel to a 1 m/s
water flow, for the two configurations shown. Before
calculating, which configuration do you expect to
experience the lower drag? Assume that the plates
attached with string are far enough apart for wake
effects to be negligible and that the kinematic
viscosity of water is 10-6 m2/s.
Drag is much lower on composite plates compared to separate plates. This is because w is
largest near leading edges and falls off rapidly. In this problem, the separate plates experience
leading edges four times!
UL 1 0.075
=
= 0.75 105
6
n
10
which justify assumption that the boundary layer is laminar for the entire length
UL 1 ( 4 x0.075 )
=
= 3 105
n
106
q
x
D = r bU 2q
0.664
Re x
qL =
0.664
0.664
0.075=0.182x10-3 m
L=
5
Re L
0.75 10
Drag
on each plate (one side) is: D r=
bU 2q = 1030.075 x12 0.182x10-3 13.65 x103 N
=
Total drag for 4 plates and both sides is: 8 13.65 x103 N =
0.109 N
For composite plates, q L on each plate is
qL =
0.664
0.664
L=
( 4 0.075)
Re L
4 0.75 105
= 2 0.182x10-3 m
Drag on composite plate (one side) is: D =
r bU 2q = 1030.075 x12 ( 2 0.182x10-3 ) =
2 13.65 x103 N
Total drag (both sides) is: 2 ( 2 13.65 x103 ) N =
0.054 N