MCA21/2013

15.04.2015
Filetakenuptodayas14.04.2015wasdeclaredholiday
onaccountofbirthdayofDr.B.R.Ambedkar,aspernotificationno.
300/G4/Genl./DHC dated 13.04.2015 of High Court of Delhi. In
termsthereof,thecasesfixedforordersfor14.04.2015weretobe
takenuptodayi.e.15.04.2015.

Present:

None.
Videmyseparateorderannouncedintheopencourt,the

applicationu/s5ofLimitationAct,1963ofappellantisallowedand
delayhasbeencondonedsubjecttopaymentofcostofRs.2000/by
appellanttorespondent.
Tocomeupforargumentsonappealon21.05.2015.

(GURVINDERPALSINGH)
ADJ(Central)01,Delhi/15.04.2015
(AD)

M/2A/2010
15.04.2015
Present:

Appellant with Sh. J.K. Nayyar, ld. counsel seeks

adjournmentforfilingamendedmemoofparties.Letitbesofiled.
Noneforrespondents.
Putupforconsiderationon06.07.2015.

(GurvinderPalSingh)
ADJ1(Central)Delhi
15.04.2015(hk)

M12/2014
15.04.2015
Present:

Noneforparties.
CourtnoticesissuedtoLRsnotreceivedback.
Order16.10.2014becompliedafreshfor07.07.2015.

(GurvinderPalSingh)
ADJ1(Central)Delhi

15.04.2015(hk)

M13/2014
15.04.2015
Present:

Noneforparties.
CourtnoticesissuedtoLRsnotreceivedback.
Order16.10.2014becompliedafreshfor07.07.2015.

(GurvinderPalSingh)
ADJ1(Central)Delhi

15.04.2015(hk)

M11/2014
15.04.2015
Present:

Noneforparties.
Intheinterestofjustice,putupforargumentson

restorationapplicationandapplicationforcondonationofdelayon
07.07.2015.

(GurvinderPalSingh)
ADJ1(Central)Delhi

15.04.2015(hk)

M10/2014
15.04.2015
Present:

Noneforparties.
Intheinterestofjustice,putupforargumentson

restorationapplicationandapplicationforcondonationofdelayon
07.07.2015.

(GurvinderPalSingh)
ADJ1(Central)Delhi

15.04.2015(hk)

CSNo.149/2014
15.04.2015
Present:

Noneforplaintiff.
Anapplicationonbehalfofplaintiffu/oVRule20read

withSec.151CPCwasfiled.
RCsenttodefendantwasreceivedbackwiththereport
addressofdefendantbeingincomplete.Inthisfactofthematter,let
plaintifffurnishcompleteandcorrectaddressofdefendant,supported
byaffidavit,withinaweekuponwhichprocessbeissuedtodefendant
videspeedpost/permissiblecourier/RCandontakingstepswithina
week,for08.07.2015.
There appears no occasion for issuance of process by
publication.

(GurvinderPalSingh)
ADJ1(Central)Delhi
15.04.2015(hk)

C.S.No.210/2014
15.04.2015
Present:

Sh. Kumar Ranjit, ld. counsel for petitioner has given

statement for withdrawal of application u/s 9 of Arbitration and

ConciliationAct,1996.
In view of the statement of petitioner's counsel, the
applicationisdismissedaswithdrawn.
FilebeconsignedtoRecordRoom.

(GurvinderPalSingh)
ADJ1(Central)Delhi
15.04.2015(hk)

C.S.No.212/2014
15.04.2015
Present:

Sh. Kumar Ranjit, ld. counsel for petitioner has given

statement for withdrawal of application u/s 9 of Arbitration and

ConciliationAct,1996.
In view of the statement of petitioner's counsel, the
applicationisdismissedaswithdrawn.
FilebeconsignedtoRecordRoom.

(GurvinderPalSingh)
ADJ1(Central)Delhi
15.04.2015(hk)

C.S.No.211/2014
15.04.2015
Present:

Sh. Kumar Ranjit, ld. counsel for petitioner has given

statement for withdrawal of application u/s 9 of Arbitration and

ConciliationAct,1996.
In view of the statement of petitioner's counsel, the
applicationisdismissedaswithdrawn.
FilebeconsignedtoRecordRoom.

(GurvinderPalSingh)
ADJ1(Central)Delhi
15.04.2015(hk)

C.S.No.213/2014
15.04.2015
Present:

Sh. Kumar Ranjit, ld. counsel for petitioner has given

statement for withdrawal of application u/s 9 of Arbitration and

ConciliationAct,1996.
In view of the statement of petitioner's counsel, the
applicationisdismissedaswithdrawn.
FilebeconsignedtoRecordRoom.

(GurvinderPalSingh)
ADJ1(Central)Delhi
15.04.2015(hk)

C.S.No.18/2015
15.04.2015
Present:

Sh. Kumar Ranjit, ld. counsel for petitioner has given

statement for withdrawal of application u/s 9 of Arbitration and

ConciliationAct,1996.
In view of the statement of petitioner's counsel, the
applicationisdismissedaswithdrawn.
FilebeconsignedtoRecordRoom.

(GurvinderPalSingh)
ADJ1(Central)Delhi
15.04.2015(hk)

C.S.No.43/2015
15.04.2015
Present:

Sh.ManishKumar,ld.counselforplaintiff.
RCreceivedbackwithreportofdefendant havingleft

thegivenaddress.
Freshaddressofdefendantbefurnishedwithsupporting
affidavitandontakingstepswithinaweek,defendantbeservedvide
speedpost/RC/permissiblecourier,for08.07.2015.

(GurvinderPalSingh)
ADJ1(Central)Delhi
15.04.2015(hk)

M3/2015
15.04.2015
Present:

Noneforapplicant/plaintiff.
Noticesofapplicationu/oIXRule4readwithSec.151

CPCwereissuedtodefendants/counsel.
Defendants 1, 2 & 4 are reportedly expired while
defendantno.3andcounselareservedbutnoneappearedforthem.
Appropriate steps be taken by applicant/plaintiff
accordingly.
Matterisfixedforfurtherproceedingson09.07.2015.

(GurvinderPalSingh)
ADJ1(Central)Delhi
15.04.2015(hk)

VivekKhannaVs.ShyamLalMittal
RCA02/2015
15.04.2015
Filetakenuptodayonapplication ofappellantseekingissuanceof
dastisummonsforpublication.
Present:

Noneforappellantdespitecalls.
Orderdated08.04.2015needstobecompliedinletterand

spirit.
Thereisnooccasionforissuanceofdastisummons.
Putupondatedfixedi.e25.05.2015.

(GurvinderPalSingh)
ADJ1(Central)Delhi
15.04.2015(hk)

C.S.No.30/2013
15.04.2015
Present:

Sh.D.D.Dhyani,ld.counselforplaintiff.
Sh.AmolSharma,ld.counselfordefendantno.1withSh.

PrabhasKumar,employeeofdefendantno.1.
Nonefordefendantno.2.
Defendantno.3ispreviouslyexparte.
Ld.counselfordefendantno.1hasfiledhispowerof
attorney
Sh. Prabhas Kumar, examined as DW1 and cross
examined.Ld.counselfordefendantno.1Sh.AmolSharmahasgiven
statementofclosingdefendant'sevidenceonbehalfofdefendantno.1.
Nootherwitnessofdefendants'isinattendance.Nosteps
havebeentakenbydefendantno.2forleadingevidence.
Defendant'sevidenceisclosed.
Putupforfinalargumentson28.05.2015.Partiesareat
libertytofilewrittenargumentsnotexceedingfivepageseach.

(GurvinderPalSingh)
ADJ1(Central)Delhi
15.04.2015(hk)

C.S.No.80/2014
15.04.2015
Present:

Sh. Rajeev Garg, ld. counsel for plaintiff seeks

adjournmenttosubmitbeingnotpreparedtodaywantingtoinspectthe
file.
Put up for consideration and further proceedings on
02.06.2015.

(GurvinderPalSingh)
ADJ1(Central)Delhi
15.04.2015(hk)

C.S.No.84/2014
15.04.2015
Present:

Sh.DevashishRout,ld.proxycounselforplaintiff.
Sh.R.K.Jain,ld.counselfordefendanthasfiledreplyto

applicationseekingamendmentofplaint.Copygiven.
Fixedforargumentsonsaidapplicationon01.06.2015.

(GurvinderPalSingh)
ADJ1(Central)Delhi
15.04.2015(hk)

C.S.No.119/2014
15.04.2015
Present:

PlaintiffwithSh.SanjayShangari,ld.counsel.
Sh.AnkurGhaiandSh.SarveshSingh,ld.counselsfor

defendant.
Ld.counselforplaintiffhasfiledreplytoapplicationfor
deposit of rent by defendant, replication with documents and
rejoinders to interim injunction application and application u/s
XXXIXRule10CPC.Copiesgiven.
Put up for arguments on aforesaid applications on
02.06.2015.

(GurvinderPalSingh)
ADJ1(Central)Delhi
15.04.2015(hk)

C.S.No.122/2012
15.04.2015
Present:

Sh.Ashwani,ld.proxycounselforplaintiff.
Defendant no.2 with Sh. Saurabh Tyagi, ld. proxy

counselforSh.J.K.Jain,ld.counselfordefendants1to6and8,8&
11.
Ld. counsel for plaintiff is stated to be ill and not
available today and adjournment is sought by proxy counsel for
plaintiff.
Putupon18.05.2015forfinalarguments.

(GurvinderPalSingh)
ADJ1(Central)Delhi
15.04.2015(hk)

C.S.No.527/2009
15.04.2015
Present:

PlaintiffwithSh.InduBhushanVimal,ld.counsel.
Defendantno.2 withSh.PuneetSingh, ld.counselfor

both defendants seeks adjournment being not prepared to address

argumentstoday.
Putupforfinalargumentson27.05.2015.

(GurvinderPalSingh)
ADJ1(Central)Delhi
15.04.2015(hk)

TM75/2011
15.04.2015
Present:

Sh.ArnavGhosh,ld.proxycounselforplaintiff.
Sh. Abhishek Malhotra, ld. counsel for defendant has

placed on record copy of deposit of cost of Rs. 10,000/ inPrime

Minister'sNationalReliefFundbynetbankingandseeksoneweek's
adjournment to address arguments after taking instructions from
defendant.
Plaintiff'scounselisalsostatedtobenotavailabletoday.
Putupforfinalargumentson02.05.2015.Partiesareat
libertytofilewrittenargumentsnotexceedingsixpageseach.

(GurvinderPalSingh)
ADJ1(Central)Delhi
15.04.2015(hk)

C.S.No.63/2012
15.04.2015
Present:

Plaintiff with Sh. Sumit Rana, ld. proxy counsel seeks

adjournment as plaintiff's counsel is not available todayto address

arguments.
Defendantno.1withSh.R.K.Saini,ld.counsel.
Putupforfinalargumentson18.05.2015.Partiesareat
libertytofilewrittenargumentsnotexceedingfivepageseach.

(GurvinderPalSingh)
ADJ1(Central)Delhi
15.04.2015(hk)

C.S.No.137/13
15.04.2015
Present:

Mohd.Sadiqeen,partnerofplaintiffwithSh.S.S.Ali,ld.

counsel.
Sh.MayanakWadhwa,ld.counselfordefendant.
Plaintiff's counsel has filed written arguments. Copy
given.
Oralargumentsalsoheard.
Putupfororderson30.04.2015.

(GurvinderPalSingh)
ADJ1(Central)Delhi
15.04.2015(hk)

RCA13/2014
15.04.2015
Present:

Sh.S.A.Khanld.counselforplaintiff.
Sh.KishorKumar,ARofrespondentseeksadjournment

ascounselisnotavailable.Adjournmentisgranted.
Nowtocomeupforargumentsonappealon13.05.2015

(GurvinderPalSingh)
ADJ1(Central)Delhi
15.04.2015(hk)

Ex.No.162/2011
15.04.2015
Present:

Sh.PrashantBatra,ld.counselforDHhasmoved

applicationu/s151CPCwithaffidavitofDH.
Nowtocomeupon05.05.2015forconsiderationand
disposalofthisapplication.

(GurvinderPalSingh)
ADJ1(Central)Delhi
15.04.2015(hk)

C.S.No.358/2013
15.04.2015
Present:

PlaintiffwithSh.SandeepSingh,ld.counselforplaintiff.
Defendantinperson.
Plaintiffhasfiledhisaffidavitinevidence.Copygiven

today.Advancecopyofaffidavitwasnotsuppliedtodefendantprior
totoday.
Matterisfixedforplaintiff'sevidenceon19.05.2015.
Stepsbetakenwithinaweek.
(GurvinderPalSingh)
ADJ1(Central)Delhi
15.04.2015(hk)

C.S.No.415/2009
15.04.2015
Present:

Noneforplaintiff.
Defendantno.20Sh.GauravwithSh.S.S.Barwal,ld.

counsel.
Ld.counselpresentsubmitsthathehasnotreceivedany
advancecopyofaffidavitofplaintiff'switness.
Beawaited.

(GurvinderPalSingh)
ADJ1(Central)Delhi
15.04.2015(hk)
Calledagain.Itis1.25PM.
Present:

Noneforplaintiff.
Defendantno.20Sh.Gauravinperson.
Noneforotherdefendants.
Beawaited.

(GurvinderPalSingh)
ADJ1(Central)Delhi

15.04.2015(hk)

PTO

::2::

Calledagain.Itis2.35PM.
Present:

Noneforplaintiffdespiterepeatedcallssincemorning.
Defendantno.20Sh.Gauravinperson.
No plaintiff's witness is in attendance. No steps have

beentakenforsummoninganywitness.Plaintiff'sevidenceisclosed.
Putupfordefendant'sevidenceon19.05.2015.Advance
copyofaffidavitsofwitnesseswhoaretobeexamined,besuppliedto
thesideoppositeatleast15dayspriortonextdateofhearing.

(GurvinderPalSingh)
ADJ1(Central)Delhi

15.04.2015(hk)

C.S.No.533/2008
15.04.2015
Present:

Sh.S.S.Dhingra,ld.counselforplaintiff.
Defendants1&4withSh.Mohd.Yameen,ld.counsel

fordefendants1to6.
DW2Ms.ShirinDuttacrossexamined.Ld.counselfor
defendants1to6hasgivenstatementofclosingdefendant'sevidence
onbehalfofdefendants1to6.
Plaintiff'scounselsubmitsthathehasnotreceivedany
advance copy of affidavit of any defendant witness on behalf of
defendants7&8.Despiteopportunities,nowitnessofdefendants7&
8isinattendancenoranycounselforthemhasappeared.
Defendants'evidenceisclosed.
Putupon02.06.2015forfinalarguments.

(GurvinderPalSingh)
ADJ1(Central)Delhi
15.04.2015(hk)

MCA2/2013
15.04.2015
Present:

AppellantwithSh.J.K.Chopra,ld.counsel.
Sh.K.L.Tandon,partnerofrespondentwithSh.Bharat

BhushanGupta,ld.counsel.
Heard.
Ld. appellants counsel has given statement that under
instructions he seeks to withdraw this appeal, with liberty to take
recoursetoappropriateremedy,whateverispermissibleinlaw.
Inviewofthestatementofappellant'scounsel,theappeal
isdismissedaswithdrawnwithlibertyprayedfor.
FilebeconsignedtoRecordRoom.

(GurvinderPalSingh)
ADJ1(Central)Delhi
15.04.2015(hk)

M34/2014
15.04.2015
Present:

PetitionerwithSh.UchitBhandari,ld.counsel.
Sh.K.N.Singh,ld.counselforrespondent.
WitnessSh.JagdishLalGaba,DeputyManagerofState

BankofIndia, RASMECCCG.T.Road,Panipat(HR)ispresent.
Petitioner'scounselsubmitsthatinadvertentlyhecouldnotmentionin
theapplicationtheparticularsofadvertisementofthebank,whichwas
tobeproducedbythewitnessandintheabsenceofwhich,witness
cannotbeexaminedtoday.Thewitnessisdischargedfortoday.
Putuforevidenceofapplicant/petitioneron08.07.2015.

(GurvinderPalSingh)
ADJ1(Central)Delhi
15.04.2015(hk)

M33/2012
15.04.2015
Present:

Sh.K.N.Singh,ld.counselforapplicant/petitioner.
RespondentinpersonwithSh.UchitBhandari,ld.
counsel.
PutupwithconnectedmatterbearingNo.M34/2012on

08.07.2015.

(GurvinderPalSingh)
ADJ1(Central)Delhi
15.04.2015
(hk)

ICICIBankLtd.Vs.HarishKumar
Ex.No.48/11
15.04.2015
FiletakenuptodayonapplicationofDHforcondonationofdelayin
filingthePF.
Present:

Nonedespitecalls.
Stepswerenottakenwithintwoweeksof25.02.2015i.e.

thelastdateofhearing.Not muchtimeisleftforthenextdatei.e.
01.05.2015. Neither the AR of DH nor the counsel of DH has
appeared.
Letmatterbeputupondatefixedi.e.01.05.2015.

(GurvinderPalSingh)
ADJ1(Central)Delhi
15.04.2015(hk)

CSNo.261/2013
15.04.2015
Present:

Sh.Mohd.Ikram,ld.counselforplaintiff.
Sh.VineetKaushik,ld.counselfordefendant.
Argumentsheard.
Putupfororderson14.05.2015.

(GurvinderPalSingh)
ADJ1(Central)Delhi
15.04.2015(hk)

CSNo.194/14
15.04.2015
Present:

PlaintiffwithSh.AnilKumarSingh,ld.counselhasfiled

documentswithlist.
DefendantwithSh.ParveenKumar,ld.counsel.
Admissiondenialofdocumentsgotdone.
Defendant has admitted her signatures on sale deed dt.
23.08.2005,executedbySmt.KamlaDeviinherfavourandhasdenied
purportedsignaturesofheronGPA,AgreementtoSell,Affidavit,Will,
Receipt,PossessionLetterandRentreceiptviz.documentsatpages19
to29oflistofdocumentsfiledtodaybyplaintiff.Intokenofabovesaid
admissiondenial,defendanthasappendedhersignaturesanddefendant's
counselhasalsososigned.TheaforesaidSaleDeed dt.23.08.2005is
nowexhibitedasEx.P1.
Heard.Perused.
Fromthepleadingsoftheparties,followingissuesariseand
areframed:
1)WhetherthedefendantexecutedGPA,AgreementtoSell,
Affidavit,Will,ReceiptandPossessionLetteron04.07.2011in
favourofplaintiff?OPP
2)Whethertheplaintiffhadletoutthesuitpropertytodefendant?
OPP

::2::
3)Whetherthedefendanthadpaidrentfrom05.08.2011to
05.11.20011,asalleged?OPP
4)Whethertheplaintiffisentitledforpossessionofsuitproperty?
OPP
5)Whethertheplaintiffisentitledforrent?Ifso,atwhatrateand
forwhatperiod?OPP
6)Whethertheplaintiffisentitledformesneprofits?Ifso,at
whatrateandforwhatperiod?OPP
7)Whethernocauseofactionexistsinfavourofplaintiffand
againstthedefendant?OPD
8)Relief
Nootherissuearisesorpressedfor.
Matterisnowfixedforplaintiff'sevidenceon09.07.2015.Listof
witnesses be filed by the parties within 15 days. Advance copy of
affidavitsofwitnesses,whoaretobeexamined,besuppliedtotheside
oppositeatleast15dayspriortothenextdateofhearing.

(GurvinderPalSingh)
ADJ1(Central)Delhi
15.04.2015(hk)

CSNo.85/2015
DineshBhatiaVs.KhemSingh
Fresh suit received by way of assignment. It be checked and
registered.
15.04.2015
Present:

Sh.SagarAggarwal,ld.counselforplaintiff.
Summonsofthesuitbeissuedtodefendantonfilingof

PF/RC/speedpostfor02.06.2015.Stepsbetakenwithinaweek.

(GurvinderPalSingh)
ADJ1(Central)Delhi
15.04.2015(hk)

TM09/2015
AdidasAGVs.ChopraSons

Fresh suit received by way of assignment. It be checked and

registered.
15.04.2015
Present:

Sh. Narinder Kumar, AR of plaintiff with Sh. Pramod

KumarSingh,ld.counsel.
Requestforpassingexparteinteriminjunctionismade
with insistence for appointing Local Commissioner for seizing the
counterfeit products from the building/shop of the defendant. It is
contendedthatifpriornoticeofsuitisgiventothedefendant,hewill
in all probability remove the infringed material and equipment in
order to frustrate thecase. Request seems genuineinviewofthe
documents and purported counterfeit products emanating from
defendantshown.
Plaintiff claims to be the largest manufacturer of
Sportswearapparels, shoes and accessories in Europe and second
largestintheworld.Itistheowneroftrademarks'adidas',withlogo
ofthreestrips,'trefoil'anditsproductsunderthesemarksare
TM09/2015

Page1of5

available in 160 countries worldwide including India. Although, it

formally entered Indiain 1989yet adidas and related brands were
alreadywellknownhere.Theplaintiffhassponsoredmanyeventsin
the Olympics and FIFA world cup. The plaintiff carries out
advertisementsinIndiaandotherpartsoftheworld throughprint,
televisionandothermediaforpromotionofitsbrandandproductsand
incurshugeexpensesonaccountofadvertisement.Theplaintiffhas
hugeturnoverandintheyear2012itsworldwidenetsaleswere14883
millionEuro.Theplaintiffhasgotitsvarioustrademarks,logosand
devices registered from 1989 onwards. Its products under the
registeredtrademarkhaveextensivelybeenacceptedasqualityand
standard products. The excellent reputation and goodwill has thus
been acquired by the plaintiff amongst the user/consumers of its
productsduetostrictqualitycontrol.
DuringmarketsurveyinthelastweekofMarch,2015,
the defendants has been found to have engaged in manufacturing,
selling, stocking, and distributing of counterfeit footwear including
Shoes and accessories under the trademark and logo 'adidas', 3
stripes''threebars'and'Trefoil'anddeceptivelysimilartrademarks
whicharemuchinferiorinquality.Thelabelattachedandtrademarks
TM09/2015

Page2of5

embossedontheimpugnedproductsofdefendantaresimilarindesign
andappearanceandsufficienttoconfusethepotential purchaserof
the products of the plaintiff. The defendant has infringed the
registeredtrademarksandlogosofplaintiffwithmalafideintention.
I have perused the sample of Shoes purportedly
belongingtothedefendantandonecomingoutoftheplaintiff.The
wordmarkandlogo'adidas'and'3stripes'oftheplaintiffareusedin
the impugned product prominently as that of the plaintiff. By
adopting exactlytheidenticaltrademarkofplaintiff,thedefendant
hasapparentlytriedtoconfusethepotentialcustomersofplaintiffand
alsodenttheirrevenues.Theunwarycustomerofplaintiffneedstobe
protected from secondary products of unscrupulous persons like
defendantwhomaybeouttomakequickbuckwhilepayingforthe
high endproducts of plaintiff.Theplaintiffthushasbeen ableto
makeouttheprimafaciecaseforgrantofexparteinjunction.
The defendant, its associates and agents, distributors,
employeesrepresentativesandassignsarerestrained fromusingthe
trademarksandlogosofplaintiffonanyfootwearincludingshoesand
other accessories and from giving any indication in any manner
reflectingtheirassociation/affiliationoroftheirproductswiththe
TM09/2015

Page3of5

plaintifftillthenextdate.
In order to seize the infringing goods, material and
equipmentsfromtheshopofdefendant,Sh.AbhishekVerma(Mob.
No.9891899809)isappointedasLocalCommissionerwithdirection
tovisitthepremises/godownofdefendantlocatedat ShopNo.29,
Ground Floor, Gaffar Market, Karol Bagh, New Delhi110005
and also at Building No. 2342/2343, Ajmal Khan Road, Karol
Bagh, Beodanpura, New Delhi110005 and seize the infringing
materiali.e.Shoesandotheraccessoriesunderthetrademark'adidas',
'3 stripes' 'three bars' and 'Trefoil' and deceptively similar
trademarks. He shall prepare an inventory of goods and material
seizedfromtheaboveaddressesandreleasethemtodefendantortheir
officialonsuperdariaftersealingtheseizedarticlesinbags.Heshall
alsoputhisinitialsonthebagsandsomeoftheincriminatingmaterial
withindelibleink.
TheLd.LocalCommissionermaytakehelpofthelocal
policeincaseofneed.SHOPSKarolBaghisdirectedtoprovideall
possiblehelptotheLocalCommissionerinsmoothlycarryingoutthe
commission.

TM09/2015

Page4of5

FeeofLd.LocalCommissionerisfixedatRs.30,000/to
be paid in advance. The commission be carried out within five
workingdays fromtodayaftergivingnoticeofcommissiontothe
defendantatthespot.Ld.LocalCommissionermaysubmithisreport
withintwoweeksofexecutionofthecommission.Acompletepaper
bookbeprovidedtoLd.LocalCommissionerbytheplaintiff.
Let summons of the suit and notice of accompanying
applicationsbesenttodefendantonPF/RCfor 20.05.2015.Plaintiff
shallcomplywiththeprovisionsofOrder39Rule3CPCwithinfive
workingdaysandkeepthegenuineandcounterfeitproductofwhich
photographshavebeenfiledinsamecondition.
Copyoftheorderbegivendastiasprayed.

(GurvinderPalSingh)
ADJ1(Central)Delhi

15.04.2015(hk)

TM09/2015

Page5of5

C.S.No.533/2008
15.04.2015
DW2:Ms.ShirinDutta,recalledforcrossexamination.
OnS.A.
XXXXbySh.S.S.Dhingra,ldcounselforplaintiff.
Idonothaveanysaledeedorothertitledocumentinrespectof
suitproperty.Withinoneortwoyearsof1954whenmyfathercame
as pastor, the suit property was constructed. I am not having any
documentwithregardstoanybuildingmaterialorconstructionofthe
suitproperty.
Itiscorrecttosuggestthattheelectricityconnectionandwater
connectionofsuitpremisesareinthenameofChurch.Itiscorrectto
suggest that my father was appointed as pastor of Central Baptist
Church,1890,ChandniChowk,Delhi.
Noproperty taxofsuitpropertywaspaidbymyfatherorby
meafterhisexpiry.
ItiscorrecttosuggestthatIwasbaptisedon01.01.1968bymy
father. It is correct to suggest that on 01.01.1968 my father was
resident of 207, Kingsway Camp, Dhaka, Delhi. It is correct to
suggestthatIwasmarriedon30.09.1987withMr.VijayDuttaandat
CSNo.533/2008

DW2

Page1of3

thattimeintherecordsoftheChurchIhadmentionedmyresidenceto
beatCBCChurch.Itiscorrecttosuggestthatatthetimeofmarriage
ofmysisterMs.JyotikaMassey,shewasresidinginCBCChurch.It
is incorrect to suggest that electricity and water charges of suit
premisesafterthedeathofmyfatherin2004,werepaidbytheChurch
tillthedateoffilingofthesuit.Itiscorrecttosuggestthatbefore
filingofthesuit,counselforplaintiffhadgivenanoticetousandwe
hadgotsentareplytoitthroughcounsel.
Itisincorrecttosuggestthatnumberofsuitpremisesis1890
anditisnot1889,ChandniChowk,Delhi06.
Itiscorrecttosuggestthattheentryforusisthesamewhichis
theentryforthechurchandtheschoolrunbychurchandguardposted
attheentrygateisofthechurch.
I am not aware so I cannot admit or deny whether 1889,
ChandniChowk,Delhi06ispropertyofMr.AmarNathMehra,prop.
ofKumarCinema.
Itisincorrecttosuggestthatwehavewronglyvaluedthesuit
propertyasitisnotsupportbyanyreportofapprovedvaluer.Itis
correcttosuggestthatIhavenotdoneanyworkinthefieldofsale
and purchase of properties.Iamnotawarewhatsuitpropertycan
fetchasrentifitisletouttodaysoIcannotadmitordenywhetherthe
CSNo.533/2008

DW2

Page2of3

 suitpropertycanfetchRs.10,000/monthlyrent. Itisincorrectto
suggestthatIamdeposingfalsely.

RO&AC
(GurvinderPalSingh)
ADJ1(Central)Delhi
15.04.2015(hk)
StatementofSh.Mohd.Yameen,ld.counselfordefendants1to6.
AtBar

6.

Iclosedefendant'sevidenceonbehalfofdefendants1to

RO&AC
(GurvinderPalSingh)
ADJ1(Central)Delhi
15.04.2015(hk)

CSNo.533/2008

DW2

Page3of3

C.S.No.30/2013
15.04.2015
DW 1: Sh. Prabhas Kumar S/o Dr. Purnendu Kumar, Operation
Officer, Standard Chartered Bank; Age 33 yrs; EducationB.A.
(Hons.),OfficeaddressBahadurShahJafarMarg,NewDelhi.
OnS.A.
Itendermyevidencebywayofaffidavit,whichisEx.DW1/A
ItbearsmysignaturesatpointsAandB.Ialsorelyupondocuments
i.e copies of account opening form and ration card, which are
describedasEx.DW1/1(colly.)intheaffidavitEx.DW1/Abut I
havenotbroughttheoriginalsofthesedocumentsastheywereseized
bythepoliceandfortodaynostepsweretakenforsummoningthem.
The documents above said Ex. DW1/1(colly.) are now marked as
MarkDX1(colly.).
XXXXbySh.D.D.Dhyani,ldcounselforplaintiff.
Since01.08.2005IamemployedinStandardCharteredBank.
ItiscorrecttosuggestthatIhavenotfiledonrecordanydocument
authorisingmeasrepresentativeofdefendantbanktodeposeonits
behalf.ItiscorrecttosuggestthatIamnothavinganyattorneyor
resolutioninmyfavourissuedbydefendantbank.
CSNo. 30/2013

DW1

Page1of5

ItiscorrecttosuggestthatIhavenopersonal knowledgein
respectofthetransactionsinquestionofyear2001sinceIwasnot
employedwithdefendantbank.IhaveneverbeenpostedinThane
BranchofdefendantbankinMumbai.Ihavealsonotbeenpostedin
VasantViharbranchofdefendantbankinNewDelhi.Inthecourse
ofmyofficialworkIhaveneveropenedtheaccountsindefendant's
bank.
Inpara3ofmyaffidavitIhavementionedaboutcompletionof
allformalitiesinopeningoftheaccountinquestion.IsaythatIam
not aware what all formalities were completed before opening the
accountinquestion.Vol.IamawarethatKYCdocumentsaretaken.
KYC is Know Your Customer. I am not aware whether KYC
norms were in operation in year 2001. Identity proof and address
proof are those documents whichare required as per KYC norms.
Originalsofthecopiesofabovesaiddocumentsarealsoseenatthe
timeofopeningoftheaccount.Iamnotawarewhethertheaccount
openingformistobefilledinthebankbytheaccountholderatthe
time of opening of account. It is correct to suggest that original
documentsaretobeshownatthetimeofopeningofaccount.
Idonotknowthenameofbankofficialwhoopenedthe
CSNo. 30/2013

DW1

Page2of5

 accountinquestion,soIcannotadmitordenywhetherSh.Sachin
Pandirkar,bankofficialhadopenedtheaccountinquestion.Iamnot
awaresoIcannotadmitordenywhethertheaccountopeningform
partofMarkDX1(colly.)wasfilledupandsignedoutsidethebank
premises and given to Mr. Sachin Pandirkar, bank official, who
openedtheaccount.Itiscorrecttosuggestthatthereisnoimpression
ofanyphotographinthecopyofaccountopeningform,partofMark
DX1 (colly.). I do not know whether in year 2001 there was
requirementofaffixingphotographonaccountopeningform.Ihad
not opened my account before 2001. There is no need for any
introducerforopeningaccountbutKYCnormsaremandatory.Ido
notknowsoIcannotadmitordenythatin2001,therewasmandatory
requirementofintroducerforopeningtheaccountinquestion.Itis
correcttosuggestthattherewasnointroducerforopeningtheaccount
inquestion.IdonotknowsoIcannotadmitordenythataccount
opening form, part of MarkDX1(colly.) was filled by Mr. Sachin
Pandirkarinhisownhandwriting.IdonotknowsoIcannotadmitor
denythatnopersonofnameVijayJainexisted.Addressofaccount
holdermustbementionedintheaccountopeningform.Itiscorrectto
suggestthatintheaccountopeningform,copyMarkDX1(Colly.)no
CSNo. 30/2013

DW1

Page3of5

addressofaccountholderismentioned.IamnotawareoftheFIR
registered against Mr. Sachin Pandirkar and other employee of
defendantbankinrespectofopeningofaccountinquestion.Idonot
knowsoIcannotadmitofdenywhetherSh.RajinderJaincametoMr.
SachinPandirkarbankemployeeandgotopenedaccountinquestion.
Inmypresence,thetransactionofopeningofaccountinquestionhad
nottakenplaceandIamnotawarewhatalltranspiredintheprocess
of opening of account in question or who opened it and at whose
instanceitwassoopened. Icannotadmitordenywhetheroriginal
rationcardwasnotseenatthetimeofopeningofaccountinquestion.
It is correct to suggest that in the event of deposit and immediate
withdrawaloflargesuminnewopenedaccount,bankofficialsareto
bevigilantasperRBIguidelines.Icannotadmitordenythatcheque
book was delivered to Mahavir Impex in respect of account in
questionwithoutcompletingnecessaryformalitiesofbeingdelivered
toauthorisedperson.
It is incorrect to suggest that defendant bank is guilty of
negligence inopening theaccountinquestionand negligenceand
lachesbyhonouringandpassingthechequeindisputebearingno.
085949ofRs.947300/whichwasaforgedchequeafteritwasstolen
CSNo. 30/2013

DW1

Page4of5

fromthepremisesofplaintiff.Withouthavingalookatstatementof
accountIamunabletosaythatintheaccountinquestiontherewere
only transactions of depositofaforesaidchequeandwithdrawalof
suchmoney.ItisincorrecttosuggestthatIamdeposingfalsely.

RO&AC
(GurvinderPalSingh)
ADJ1(Central)Delhi
15.04.2015(hk)
StatementofSh.AmolSharma,ld.counselfordefendantno.1.
AtBar
Iclosedefendant'sevidenceonbehalfofdefendantno.1.

RO&AC
(GurvinderPalSingh)
ADJ1(Central)Delhi
15.04.2015(hk)

CSNo. 30/2013

DW1

Page5of5

MCA2/2013
Sh.VivekSawhneyVs.M/sBakulAgencies
15.04.2015
Statement of Sh. J.K. Chopra, ld. counsel for appellant, Enrl. No.
D/142/1964,ChamberNo.19,CivilWing,TisHazariCourts,Delhi
AtBar
UnderinstructionsIseektowithdrawthisappeal,with
libertytotakerecoursetoappropriateremedy,whateverispermissible
inlaw.

RO&AC
(GurvinderPalSingh)
ADJ1(Central)Delhi
15.04.2015(hk)

C.S.No.210/2014
HDFCBankVs.Mohd.Firoz
15.04.2015
StatementofSh.KumarRanjit,ld.counselforpetitioner;Enrl.No.
BR/2434/2012; Chamber No. 186 A, Western Wing, Tis Hazari
Courts,Delhi.
AtBar
Iseektowithdrawtheapplicationu/s9ofArbitrationand
ConciliationAct,1996,filedonbehalfofpetitionerbank.

RO&AC
(GurvinderPalSingh)
ADJ1(Central)Delhi
15.04.2015(hk)

C.S.No.212/2014
HDFCBankVs.AbhishekDhir
15.04.2015
StatementofSh.KumarRanjit,ld.counselforpetitioner;Enrl.No.
BR/2434/2012; Chamber No. 186 A, Western Wing, Tis Hazari
Courts,Delhi.
AtBar
Iseektowithdrawtheapplicationu/s9ofArbitrationand
ConciliationAct,1996,filedonbehalfofpetitionerbank.

RO&AC
(GurvinderPalSingh)
ADJ1(Central)Delhi

15.04.2015(hk)

C.S.No.211/2014
HDFCBankVs.GurmeetSingh
15.04.2015
StatementofSh.KumarRanjit,ld.counselforpetitioner;Enrl.No.
BR/2434/2012; Chamber No. 186 A, Western Wing, Tis Hazari
Courts,Delhi.
AtBar
Iseektowithdrawtheapplicationu/s9ofArbitrationand
ConciliationAct,1996,filedonbehalfofpetitionerbank.

RO&AC
(GurvinderPalSingh)
ADJ1(Central)Delhi

15.04.2015(hk)

C.S.No.213/2014
HDFCBankVs.AnmeetKaur
15.04.2015
StatementofSh.KumarRanjit,ld.counselforpetitioner;Enrl.No.
BR/2434/2012; Chamber No. 186 A, Western Wing, Tis Hazari
Courts,Delhi.
AtBar
Iseektowithdrawtheapplicationu/s9ofArbitrationand
ConciliationAct,1996,filedonbehalfofpetitionerbank.

RO&AC
(GurvinderPalSingh)
ADJ1(Central)Delhi

15.04.2015(hk)

C.S.No.18/2015
HDFCBankVs.AjabSingh
15.04.2015
StatementofSh.KumarRanjit,ld.counselforpetitioner;Enrl.No.
BR/2434/2012; Chamber No. 186 A, Western Wing, Tis Hazari
Courts,Delhi.
AtBar
Iseektowithdrawtheapplicationu/s9ofArbitrationand
ConciliationAct,1996,filedonbehalfofpetitionerbank.

RO&AC
(GurvinderPalSingh)
ADJ1(Central)Delhi

15.04.2015(hk)