Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ABSTRACT
Background: Nutritional status of children is an indicator of nutritional profile of entire community. It is a major
public health problem and accounts for about half of all child deaths worldwide. Objectives: To study the
prevalence of Protein Energy Malnutrition (PEM) and its various determinants in children 0 -6 years in rural
community. Method: A cross-sectional study done by conducting house to house survey, 449 children (0-6
years) covered from the sub centre villages of additional Primary Health Center (PHC) of Rithora, District
Bareilly. Result: The overall occurrence of PEM in under 6 years children was observed to be 49.44%,
however it was found to be significantly higher (64.87%) in the age group of 3-6 years as compare to other age
group. The proportion of grade I, II, III and IV of under nutrition observed was 45.49%, 38.30%, 14.86 and 1.35%
respectively. Prevalence of underweight was significantly higher in children belonging to nuclear families and in
children of illiterate mothers. . There was direct association of underweight in relation to caste, poor housing and
environmental sanitations and low standard of living index. Conclusion: The occurrence of PEM is more in children
of 3-6 age group specially in females, which may be due to lack of attention to this age group in rural areas.
Key Words: Under nutrition, malnutrition, nutritional correlates, nutritional status, PEM.
INTRODUCTION
Malnutrition continues to be a primary cause of ill health and mortality among children in developing countries. It is a
1
major public health problem and accounts for about half of all child deaths worldwide . About 150 million children in developing
1
countries are still malnourished and more than half of underweight children live in South East Asia Region (SEAR) . The high
levels of under nutrition in children in South Asia pose a major challenge for child survival and development. Besides poverty,
there are other factors that directly or indirectly affect the nutritional status of children. Several studies showed that maternal
3
education emerges as a key element of an overall strategy to address malnutrition .The best global indicator of childrens well
being is growth. Poor growth is attributable to a range of factors closely linked to overall standards of living and the ability of
populations to meet their basic needs, such as access to food, housing and health care. Assessment of growth is the single
measurement that best defines the nutritional and health status of children, and provides an indirect measurement of the
quality of life of the entire population.
__________________________
1. Associate Professor; 2. Assistant Professor, Dept. of Community Medicine; 3. Assistant Professor, Dept. of Pharmacology;
4. Public Relation Officer, 5. Medical Officer, Rohilkhand Medical College & Hospital, Bareilly, UP, India.
Indexed in : Index Medicus (IMSEAR), INSDOC, NCI Current Content, Database of Alcohol & Drug Abuse, National Database in TB &
Allied Diseases, IndMED, Entered in WHO CD ROM for South East Asia.
HS Joshi et al
Determinants of protein energy malnutrition (PEM) in 0-6 years children in rural community
Despite improvements in some measures, poor nutrition is still a serious problem, especially in Uttar Pradesh,
among children from low socioeconomic groups. The present study was conducted with the objectives of : 1.
To find out the PEM prevalence among 0-6 years age group
2.
To identify the different factors which affect the prevalence of PEM among rural population of Bareilly district.
RESULTS
The overall prevalence of PEM was 222 (49.44%) out of total 449 children of age group 0-6 years surveyed. The
prevalence of underweight in children 3-6 years (64.87%) was significantly higher than other age group, followed by 21.62% in
age group of 1-3 years. Out of total 449 children 248 (55.23%) were males and 201(44.77%) were females and prevalence of
under nutrition was observed 39.92 %( 99 out of 248) in males and 61.19% (123 out of 201) in females. Significant difference
observed between prevalence of PEM and sex - Table-1.
Table-1: Age and sex wise prevalence of PEM in under six years children
Male
Age
(years)
No. of
children
Female
Under
weight
Total
No. of
children
Under
weight
No. of
children
Under
weight
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
65
68.0
19
29.23
31
32.3
11
35.5
96
21.4
30
13.51
1-3
51
54.26
25
49.02
43
45.74
23
53.49
94
20.94
48
21.62
3-6
132
50.97
55
41.7
127
49.03
89
70.01
259
57.68
144
64.87
Total
248
55.23
99
39.92
201
44.77
123
61.19
0-1
Age
155
449
100
222
100
=19.26, df = 1, p =0.0000114
April-June, 2011
HS Joshi et al
Determinants of protein energy malnutrition (PEM) in 0-6 years children in rural community
Underweight
Male
No.
No.
Female
%
No.
Grade I
101
45.49
37
36.63
64
63.37
Grade II
85
38.30
42
49.41
43
50.59
Grade III
33
14.86
15
45.45
18
54.55
Grade IV
03
1.35
01
33.33
02
66.67
Total
222
100.0
99
44.59
123
55.41
Out of total 449, 278 (61.92%) children belonged to joint family and 171 (38.08%) to nuclear family. Prevalence of
underweight was observed 50.9% in nuclear and 49.1% in joint family children of 0-6 year's age group. The association
observed between underweight and type of family was significant (p=0.000001), as shown in Table-3.
Table-3: Determinants of PEM in under six years children
Variables
No. of Children
No.
Underweight
No.
Significance
value
Types of Family
Joint
278
61.92
109
49.1
Nuclear
171
38.08
113
50.9
Upper
207
46.1
65
29.28
Lower
242
53.9
157
70.72
High
128
28.51
31
13.96
Medium
174
38.75
89
40.10
Low
147
32.74
106
45.94
= 29.52,
df = 1, p = 0.000001
Caste
2
= 48.68,
df = 1, p = 0.000001
SLI
2
= 62.85,
df = 2, p = 0.0000001
133
29.62
87
39.19
Satisfactory
249
55.46
126
56.76
Good
67
14.92
09
4.05
Illiterate
257
57.24
145
65.32
Literate
192
42.76
77
34.68
449
100.0
222
49.44
= 48.46,
df = 2, p =0.000001
Mother Education
2
Total
= 11.06,
df = 1, p =0.00088
Out of total 449 children, 207 (46.1%) belongs to upper caste and 242 (53.9%) belongs to lower caste, in that 70.72%
of lower caste children were found under weight. Out of total 222 under weight children maximum 106 (45.94%) belongs to
family with low Standard of Living Index (SLI), 126 (56.76%) children were from families having housing and environmental
condition satisfactory and 87(39.19%) children were from poor housing and environmental conditions. Out of total 449,
mothers of 257 children were illiterate and 65.32 % (145) of those children were found to be under weight.
156
April-June, 2011
HS Joshi et al
Determinants of protein energy malnutrition (PEM) in 0-6 years children in rural community
Significant association was observed between prevalence of underweight and different factors like type of family,
2
caste, Standard of Living Index (SLI), Housing, environmental sanitation and literacy with
2
p=0.000001,
=48.68, p=0.000001,
=62.85 p=0.0000001,
=29.52,
(Table-3).
DISCUSSION
In present study prevalence of PEM and its relation to various epidemiological factors was assessed in 449 children
on the basis of weight for age. Out of total 449, 21.4% of children were in 0-1 years age group, 20.94% were in 1-3 years age
group and 57.68% were in 3-6 years age group. 55.23% were males and 44.77% were females.
The overall prevalence of underweight was 49.44%. The difference in prevalence of underweight in relation to age
and sex was found to be statistically significant (p < 0.0001). Chakraborty et al (2006) in rural Jhansi reported overall
prevalence of underweight in 0-6 years age group as 67% and reported same significant difference in prevalence of
underweight in relation to age and sex, as present study other studies including NFHS II (1998-99) reported PEM more
prevalent in female as compare to males specially in rural areas, this may be due to more concern for male child
1, 3, 7
. But
Dwivedi et al in their study in urban slum found more males affected with lower grades of under nutrition than females.
Early malnutrition among rural children as compared to urban children may be attributed to the better parental care
given to the urban children. A comparatively higher prevalence of underweight (60.0%) was reported by Vijayaraghavan et al
5
(1998) . In present study prevalence of PEM observed more in 3-6 years age group (64.87%) as compare to other studies
3
who observed malnutrition was more prevalent in the younger age group,
2
i.e. 3 years(80.9% and 71% respectively). In NFHS III (2005-06) done in children <3 years of age prevalence of underweight
was 43.7% in rural population of Uttar Pradesh. The prevalence of PEM being significantly higher (p < 0.00001) in the nuclear
family (50.9%) in comparison to joint family (49.1%), may be due to the reason that children in the joint family are nutritionally
better cared as there is tendency to share the food with the children by all the family members.
In the present study, the proportion of children with grade I, II, III and IV PEM were 45.49%, 38.30%, 14.86% and
3
1.35% respectively, where as 29.0%, 25.5%, 9% and 3.5% reported by Chakraborty et al . Mild, moderate and severe grades
8
of malnutrition reported by other workers are as follows: Srivastav et al (1979) 29.5%, 10.6% and 2.9%; Kakkar et al (1987)
38%, 31% and 9%. In National Family Health Survey II (NFHS II) (1998-99) value for, moderate and severe grades of
malnutrition according to underweight were 47.0% and 18.0% respectively with corresponding figures for U.P. being 51.7%
and 21.9% respectively. In present study severe grades (III and IV) observed more in females (54.55% and 66.67%) as
3
compare to males which were higher than as observed by Chakraborty et al who observed only 7.3% and 2.7% respectively.
In present study PEM was reported significantly higher (p<0.0001) in lower caste (70.72%) as compare to upper
1
caste (29.28%), similar findings were given by NFHS II (1998-99). In the present study PEM was inversely associated with
standard of living index with prevalence of 45.94% in children of low standard of living index (p<0.00001) as also observed in
1
NFHS II (1998-99)
both at national level and Uttar Pradesh level. A similar finding of malnutrition being more prevalent in
children belonging to lower socioeconomic groups was also found by , Rao et al (1990)
10
11
reason for malnutrition being more prevalent among lower socioeconomic groups may be due to their lower purchasable
capacity for food and unavailability of hygienic and healthy living environment among them.
The prevalence of underweight in the present study was higher in children of illiterate mothers (65.32%) as
compared to children of literate mothers (34.68%). Similar results that prevalence of malnutrition decreased with increasing
1
3,
12
parental literacy was found by NFHS II (1998-99) , Chakraborty et al Arya et al (1991) , Harishanker et al (2004)
157
13
and
April-June, 2011
HS Joshi et al
Determinants of protein energy malnutrition (PEM) in 0-6 years children in rural community
14
Bishnoi et al (2004) . In the present study it was found that prevalence of PEM higher (39.19% and 56.76%) when housing
and environmental sanitation conditions were poor and satisfactory while only 04.05% when environmental and sanitary
14
conditions were good (p<0.0001) which is comparable with finding Bishnoi et al (2004) .
CONCLUSION
The present study shows that the prevalence of underweight was significantly higher in children of 3-6 years of age,
sex, caste, nuclear family, low standard of living index, mothers illiteracy and poor housing and environmental sanitation.
Female child had a higher occurrence of overall and grade III and IV PEM. This may be because of the lack of attention that a
girl child receives. The PEM is higher in illiterate mothers because of lack of awareness among them. The extent of
malnutrition can be countered by educating the parents with respect to basic nutritional requirements of their children and
encouraging them to consume locally available low cost foods.
The study suggests intensification of ICDS with multi sectorial strengthing will also help a they help in taking care of
the child and educating the child along with providing meals which compliment the childs diet, thus improving their nutritional
status.
REFERENCES
1.
National Family Health SurveyII (1998-99). International Institute of Population Sciences. Mumbai, India.
2.
National Family Health SurveyIII (2005-06). International Institute of Population Sciences. Mumbai, India.
3.
Chakraborty S, Gupta S B, Chaturvedi B, Chakraborty SK. A study of PEM in children (0-6 years) in a rural population of
Jhansi District (UP). Ind J of Community Med, 2006, 31 (4): 291-92.
4.
Dwivedi SN, Banerjee N, Yadav OP. Malnutrition among children in an urban Indian slum and its associations. Indian J.
Matern Child Health 1992; 3:79-81
5.
Vijayaraghavan K, Rao DH; Diet and nutrition situation in rural India ;Indian J Med Res.1998 ;108:243-53
6.
Swami HM, Thakur JS, Bhatia SP. Nutritional status of pre-school children in an integrated child development service
(ICDS block of Chandigarh). J Indian Med Assoc 2001; 99(10): 554-556.
7.
Chirmulay D and Nisal R. Nutritional status of tribal under-five children in Ahmadnagar district, Maharashtra in relation to
weaning/feeding practices. Indian Pediatr. 1993; 30(2): 215-22.
8.
Shrivastava VK, Srivastava BC, Nandan D, Vidya Bhushan. Protein energy malnutrition among pre-school children in a
rural population of Lucknow. Indian Pediatr 1979; 16(6): 507.
9.
Kakker S. Nutritional status of preschool children in rural Hisar. Indian J Nutr Diet 1987; 24(4): 204-208.
10. Rao P and Reddy V. Discriminate function analysis: A case study of some socio-economic constraints on child nutrition.
Indian J Med Res 1990; 92: 66-71.
11. Jeyaseelan L, Lakshman M. Risk factors for malnutrition in south Indian children. J Biosoc Sci. 1997; 29(1): 93-100.
12. Arya A, Devi R. Influence of maternal literacy on the nutritional status of preschool children. Indian J Pediatr. 1991; 58(2):
265-8
13. Harishanker, Dwivedi S, Dabral SB, Walia DK. Nutritional status of children under 6 years of age. Ind J. Prev. Soc. Med.
2004; 35 (3 & 4): 156-162.
14. Bishnoi P, Sehal S, Kwatra A. Anthropometric measurements of preschool children as effected by socio-economic factors.
Asia Pac Clin Nutr. 2004; 13 (Suppl) : S132.
----
158
April-June, 2011