Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Faculty of
Chemical
Engineering
(FChE)
NRIC
911123-14-5371
921001-01-7303
921128-03-6165
Maximum Percentage
Technical Aspects
5%
Abstract
5%
Introduction
5%
Literature Review/Theory
5%
Methodology
5%
Results
5%
Discussion
5%
Conclusion
5%
References
5%
OVERALL TOTAL
45%
Score
Comment
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section
Abstract
Page
4
Introduction
Literature Review
Methodology
Conclusion
11
References
11
Appendix
12
1.0 ABSTRACT
2.1 OBJECTIVE
The objective of this experiment is to perform pressure calibration on a Bourdon tube
pressure gauge using a dead weight tester.
2.2 SIGNIFICANCE OF STUDY
Calibration is the process of checking devices and making sure that their readings are as
accurate as possible or within engineering tolerances. Thus, through this experiment, the
findings of the experiment (e.g. calibration curve) are very important to recalibrate the
Bourdon tube pressure gauge in order to have a higher accuracy. Besides that, we usually
need to know the pressure in a high pressure boiler industrially. If a pressure gauge shows a
lower pressure than actual, explosion may occur despite the pressure gauge indicating a safe
pressure level. With routine calibration, we can ensure the safety of personnel and equipment
with measuring device.
3.0 LITERATURE REVIEW
Bourdon tube is a mechanical pressure measurement device, named after the French engineer
and inventor Eugene Bourdon according to Cengel and Cimbala (2010). According to
www.ehow.com bourdon tube pressure gauges are usually used for a number of applications
such as oil drilling, ocean liner operations and manufacturing plants. These gauges inform the
operator concerning the amount of pressure in tanks or running through pipe work. This
pressure can involve air, steam, water, oil or other materials. The machinery operator should
calibrate the pressure gauge to ensure the readings are accurate.
In this experiment, a piston of known area, A was loaded with a known weight,
therefore the actual pressure in the cylinder was
P=
F mg
=
A A
P=
F mg
=
A A
P=
F mg
=
A A
3.1
where m is total mass of load and g is gravitational acceleration. From equation 3.1 the actual
pressure can be calculated.
The basic principle of bourdon tube pressure gauge is when an elastic transducer is
subjected to a pressure, it deflects. This deflection is proportional to the applied pressure
EXPERIMENT 5: CALIBRATION OF BOURDON TUBE PRESSURE GAUGE | 2SKKK (SECTION 09)
The piston was inserted into the cylinder and air bubble was removed as much as
reading of the Bourdon-tube pressure ranging from zero to maximum pressure on the scale.
The indicated Bourdon-tube pressure gauge reading was taken. The piston was rotated
prior to taking a reading for each weight to minimize friction effect on the reading.
After the maximum pressure reading was obtained, the weight was unloaded from the
Based on the data obtained, the true pressure exerted by total mass and the percentage error of
the data was calculated. According to the Figure 6, the R2 value for increasing and decreasing
pressure was 0.9994 and 0.9993 respectively where R 2 stands for coefficient of determination.
According to Chapra (2012), coefficient of determination is an indicator indicates how well
your data fits the model we are testing. The closer the R2 value is to 1 the more likely the data
points are solution to the equation that defines the curve. Hence based on the R 2 value
obtained, we can conclude that the line was a good fit to the data obtained throughout the
experiment. The graph also showed that the lines nearly intercept the origin.
Besides that, based on the Figure 6, the slope of the increasing and decreasing graph
was 1.0492 and 1.0378 respectively. According to University of Puerto Rico (2010) the slope
of the calibration curve shows the sensitivity of the pressure gauge. Sensitivity is a measure
of its ability in established that such differences are significant. Ideally, the line should have a
slope of 1. The reason that might affect both values of slope above was the large scale
division of the Bourdon tube pressure gauge (i.e. in scale of 10 kN/m 2) compared to the true
pressure correct to 2 decimal places. Non-zero intercepts of both lines suggested that positive
zero error of about 3 kN/m2 existed.
According to Figure 7 it can be calculated that the average percentage error for
increasing and decreasing was 8.32 percent and 8.80 percent respectively. Based on the
percentage error calculated, the rather low percentage error meant that calibrated pressure did
not deviate much from true pressure. Based on Figure 7, it can also be observed that the
percentage errors of the first and second readings were quite high compared to the other
readings. This was due to the rather small value of true pressure used as denominator in the
calculation of the percentage error.
In addition to that, others factors that might contribute to errors or inaccuracies in
experimental data were:
1. Presence of microscopic bubbles of air trapped inside the tube when the experiment
was carried out.
2. Wear and backlash in the gauge linkage can affect the pressure.
3. Parallax error when observers eyes were not perpendicular to the scale of the
Bourdon gauge during the value of gauge pressure was recorded.
4. Friction between piston and cylinder.
EXPERIMENT 5: CALIBRATION OF BOURDON TUBE PRESSURE GAUGE | 2SKKK (SECTION 09)
10
Some ways that can be practiced in order to improve the result were to:
1. Carry out a few replicate measurements to reduce random errors.
2. Increase the division of the scale of the Bourdon tube pressure gauge so more accurate
data can be taken.
3. Make sure the eyes were perpendicular to the scale when taking the reading to avoid
parallax error.
4. Make sure no air bubbles inside the tube when conducting the experiment.
5. Make sure to rotate the piston after adding each weight to minimize frictional effect on
the reading.
All in all, it can be said that when we already minimize all the errors, it can be
concluded that the Bourdon tube pressure gauge need to be recalibrated and maintained well
to increase its accuracy.
6.0 CONCLUSION
The Bourdon tube pressure gauge was calibrated using a dead weight tester since its
calibration data showed good correlation with a linear curve.
7.0 REFERENCES
1. Cengel, Y. A. and Cimbala, J. M. (2010). Fluid Mechanics Fundamentals and Applications,
2nd ed. New York, N. Y.: McGraw-Hill. 87.
2. Chapra, S. C. (2012). Applied Numerical Methods with MATLAB for Engineers and
Scientists, 3rd ed. New York, N. Y.: McGraw-Hill. 342.
3. http://www.ehow.com/how_12082003_calibrate-bourdon-tube-pressure-gauge.html
4. http://yourinstrumentation.blogspot.com/2011/10/bourdons-tube-pressure-gaugeprinciple.html
5. http://www.me.uprm.edu/laboratories/inme4031/pdf_Documents/Classes/Microsoft%20
Word%20-%20Class%204_Pressure%20Measurements.pdf
8.0 APPENDIX
SAMPLE CALCULATION
EXPERIMENT 5: CALIBRATION OF BOURDON TUBE PRESSURE GAUGE | 2SKKK (SECTION 09)
11
True
Calibrated pressure
pressure
(Bourdon gauge)
(kN/m2)
Increasing Decreasing
Mass
Total mass
(kN/m2)
Pressure
added (kg)
(kg)
exerted by
order of
total mass
30.92
46.37
weight
35
52
0
0.5
1 (piston)
1.5
Percentage of error
Increasing
Decreasing
order of
order of
order of
weight
37
53
weight
13.20
12.14
weight
19.66
14.30
Percentage of Error:
Percentage of error=
12
3530.92
100 =13.20
30.92
3730.92
100 =19.66
30.92
13