Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Abstract
Narrow pore pressure/fracture gradient windows often
necessitate additional casing strings to reach deeper objective
depths. Operators are constrained by the number of strings of
conventional casing that they can run through subsea or
surface wellhead equipment. Planning solid expandable
tubulars into the well design allows the operator to run
additional casing strings and drill to deeper objectives.
Using a solid expandable tubular system in the upper
sections of the well design preserves hole size from the onset
and allows more casing strings to be run without having to
push casing points to the frac-gradient limit. Preserving hole
size contributes to drilling efficiency, reduces equivalent
circulation density (ECD), and minimizes risk associated with
small hole size in deeper sections of the wellbore.
Another application for solid expandable tubulars is with
surface stack technology. Early surface stack systems were
designed around a subsea stack blowout preventer (BOP)
system placed on top of a 13-3/8 in. drilling riser. After setting
the 13-3/8 in. riser, only one or two casing strings could be run
through the riser, which precluded reaching deeper geologic
objectives.
This paper will look at two case histories. The first case
history compares two deepwater offset wells in Mississippi
Canyon. One well used expandable casing as a contingency,
and the other well incorporated the casing as part of the base
design. The second case history will evaluate a well where
solid expandable tubular technology allowed up to three
additional casing strings to be run in a surface stack
application. This paper discusses how combining solid
expandable tubular technology with surface stack technology
has pushed the technical limits of surface stack drilling into
deeper water and deeper formations.
Introduction
Adding value to any drilling design requires the deliberate and
thorough assessment of known factors and a reasonable and
plausible projection of crucial variables. Methodical planning
allows operators to design the most advantageous approach
that addresses known conditions proactively and employs the
latest technology to facilitate drilling and producing
hydrocarbons. But even the best laid plans can be disrupted by
unknown conditions, resulting in a deviation from the drilling
program design. Generating a well design to reach production
zones with viable economics requires a strategic approach that
addresses known factors as well as prepares for the
unexpected.
A major offshore operator developed a planning strategy
that enables them to optimize processes and technology for the
most efficient well design. One such strategy used by this
operator consists of solid expandable tubular systems
incorporated high in the wellbore to maintain larger hole size
at greater depths. This same operator also used expandable
casing in tandem with the latest subsea wellhead equipment
and increased the number of strings that could be run. These
planned applications allowed the operator to negate known
situations before they became problems. Coupling expandable
systems with the latest in surface stack technology made for a
more effective drilling process. Planned installations of the
expandable tubulars allowed the operator to reap significant
and substantial economic and technical benefits.
Well Design Theory and Best Practices
To improve drilling operational success, this operator, with
production in the Gulf of Mexico (GoM) and Southeast Asia,
uses a process that references and employs standard operating
procedures (SOPs), best practices, risk management and a
contractor management plan (CMP). Another factor in this
operators design strategy is the establishment of a solid
expandable liner installation database. Information gleaned
from previous expandable applications is used to populate a
database for knowledge reference that records parameters of
system installations and tracks successes and failures. This
captured knowledge helps the engineer optimize future
expandable tubular designs.
A cross-functional team of geophysicists, geologists and
drilling engineers develop a pore pressure and frac pressure
prediction based upon seismic, regional and offset data
models. From the pore pressure and frac pressure prediction,
www.petroman.ir
SPE/IADC 92622
www.petroman.ir
SPE/IADC 92622SOLI D EXPANDABLE TUBULAR TECHNOLOGY: THE VALUE OF PLANNED INSTALLATION VS. CONTINGENCY
Case Histories
Wells in which the operator used solid expandable tubular
technology revealed a distinct correlation between up-front
planning of system installations and the success rate of those
applications. In the GoM the operator ran eight unplanned
systems as contingencies and ran one as part of the planned
well design. The application of the planned expandable system
was a textbook installation. Of the eight contingency
applications, four were textbook installations, two did not get
a good pressure test, one failed during installation and one
failed post-installation. The two solid expandable liners that
failed to get a good pressure test were expanded in a distressed
well with wellbore ballooning, flowing and sticky formations.
Although both solid expandable liners were successfully set
and the operator reached the planned TD, additional trouble
time was associated with each liner due to the depths and the
hole conditions experienced while running the expandable
liner.
This same operator incorporated eight planned expandable
systems in six different wells offshore Indonesia. In addition
to the planned design application, all eight expandable systems
were used with surface stack technology in subsea
applications. All eight were successfully installed, realizing a
100% success rate defined as no problems whatsoever
occurring with the expandable liner system. From these
success percentages, the operator deduced that in a planned
design mode, more time is available to design, build and ship
the equipment. Hole conditions are usually more conducive to
running the liner than in a unplanned mode where in most
cases the wellbore has deteriorated, necessitating the need for
an expandable liner.
Gulf of Mexico, Mississippi Canyon
Well 1
The first well in the case history comparison used a solid
expandable tubular system deep in the wellbore to reach the
production zone at ~25,000 ft (Figure 1). The operator had
considered using an expandable at several points throughout
the drilling process. Since the expandable liner was being used
as a contingency, the drilling engineer evaluated the need for
an additional casing string at every casing point. Once 16 in.
base casing had been set, a 13-3/8 x 16 in. solid expandable
tubular was considered, but the operator elected not to run an
expandable at that point. The engineer again considered an
expandable after the 11-7/8 in. casing and 9-7/8 in. casing had
been set. In each case, the risk of running the expandable was
considered to be greater than the risk associated with fighting
the well down. The operator fell behind in casing points
during drilling operations and was unable to make up the point
loss on each casing string set. The operator eventually
determined that reaching TD with adequate hole size would
not be possible and elected to run a 6 x 7-5/8 in. solid
expandable liner.
Installing the Solid Expandable Tubular System
The operator prepared the hole by underreaming the 6-1/2
in. hole which had been drilled below 7-5/8 in. casing to 7 in.
By enlarging the hole section, the expandable casing could be
www.petroman.ir
SPE/IADC 92622
days required to drill this well decreased 65%, from 140 days
to 48 days to reach a comparable depth (Figure 3) resulting in
significant cost savings.
Makassar Straits in Indonesia
This same operator pioneered surface stack technology in the
mid 1990s in the Makassar Straits in Indonesia. Falling
production and low oil prices were the motivators to find a
way to reduce well costs and improve production economics.
With that goal in mind, the birth of saturation exploration
drilling and the surface stack system ensued. Initial
applications targeted wells designed with water depths around
1,000 ft and drilled to less than 10,000 ft MD. Today, with
more than 150 surface stack well applications in Indonesia,
Thailand and the Philippines, the operator has pushed the
design window for this technology into deeper waters and to
deeper drilling objectives. Surface stack applications are now
routinely run in water depths greater than 6,000 ft and to
depths of 18,000 ft MD. The operator is currently using this
technology in 7,600-ft of water, a record-setting depth.
Early surface stack systems were designed around a subsea
stack BOP system placed on top of a 13-3/8 in. drilling riser.
After setting the 13-3/8 in. riser, only one or two casing strings
could be run through the riser, which precluded reaching
deeper geologic objectives. As deeper geologic targets in
narrow pore pressure/fracture gradient windows were sought,
additional casing strings were required to reach the objectives.
Using solid expandable tubular systems enabled the operator
to run up to three additional casing strings and explore deeper
geologic objectives.
Designing the System
The drilling engineer for this case history considered
various surface stack casing designs using 13-3/8 in. or 16 in.
riser, with and without solid expandable tubular systems
(Figure 4). A 13-3/8 in. drilling riser typically set at ~4000 ft
below mud line allows an 11-3/4 in. liner to be set above the
top of a transition around 12,500 ft. An expandable liner is
then set at ~14,000 ft followed by a 9-3/8 in. liner run below
to ~15,000 ft. This design allows the operator to reach TD
beyond 16,000 ft with an 8-1/2 in. hole.
The initial well design called for a planned expandable
liner below the 11-3/4 in. liner and a contingency expandable
liner below the 9-3/8 in. liner due to pore pressure uncertainty.
During a well design peer review with global participation, it
was recommended that the expandable liner be run further up
the hole for reliability and design efficiency. The well was
redesigned with the 13-3/8 in. expandable liner below the 16
in. casing, making it the third 16 in., 109 lb/ft base casing
installation for this operator. Taking into account all of the
restrictions in the base casing, a post-expansion ID of 13.770
in. and a drift diameter of 13.632 in. could be achieved. These
dimensions allowed the operator to run a 13-3/8 in.
conventional liner, 11-3/4 in. liner, 9-5/8 x 11-3/4 in. solid
expandable tubular system and TD the well with a 9-7/8 in.
hole with several contingency conventional casing and
expandable liners available if required.
www.petroman.ir
SPE/IADC 92622
www.petroman.ir
Figure 1 Case History #1: Running the expandable liner lower in the well as a contingency.
www.petroman.ir
SPE/IADC 92622
SPE/IADC 92622
Figure 2 Case History #2: Pre-planned expandable liner run high in the well.
www.petroman.ir
Depth
SPE/IADC 92622
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
14,000
16,000
18,000
20,000
22,000
24,000
26,000
28,000
30,000
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Days
110
120
130
140
150
Figure 3 - Comparable days versus depth for both Mississippi Canyon wells.
www.petroman.ir
160
170
180
190
200
SPE/IADC 92622
Solid Expandable Tubular Applicat ions wit h Surf ace St ack Wellhead
13- 3/ 8" Riser
14-1/2" x 17"
12-1/4" x 14-1/8"
11-3/ 4"
10-5/8" x 12-1/4" Hole
8 1/2" Hole
6 1/8" Hole
- - 16, 000 f t - TD
9 3/ 8"
- - 15, 200 f t - -
13-3/ 8"
9-7/8" x 11-3/4"
8-1/2" x 9-7/8"
9-3/ 8"
TD
11-3/ 4"
- - 14, 000 f t - -
7"
20" Hole
16"
10-5/8" x 12-1/4"
10-5/8" x 11-5/8"
9 5/ 8"
16" Riser
12-1/4"x 14-1/8"
12-1/4"x 14-1/8"
13-3/ 8"
- - 12, 500 f t - -
11-3/ 4"
10-5/8" x 12-1/4"
11-3/ 4"
Riserless
17-1/2" Hole
Riserless
17-1/2" Hole
17-1/2" Hole
- - 10, 000 f t - -
13-3/ 8"
12-1/4" x 13-1/2"
13-3/ 8"
TD = 17, 500
Surf ace St ack
Riserless
W D = 6, 000
Sur f ace St ack
Riserless
TD
9 3/ 8"
8-1/2 x 9-7/8" Hole
- - 17, 000 f t - -
- - 18, 000 f t - TD
Figure 4 - Casing designs using 13-3/8 in. or 16 in. riser with and without solid expandable tubular systems.
www.petroman.ir