Professional Documents
Culture Documents
I.
II.
III.
INTRO
Constitution Article III, Section 2
The judicial power shall extend to all cases, in law and equity, arising under this
Constitution, the laws of the United States, and treaties made, or which shall be made,
under their authority;--to all cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and
consuls;--to all cases of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction;--to controversies to which
the United States shall be a party;--to controversies between two or more states;--between
a state and citizens of another state;--between citizens of different states;--between
citizens of the same state claiming lands under grants of different states, and between a
state, or the citizens thereof, and foreign states, citizens or subjects.
28 USC 1331 Federal Question
The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of all civil actions arising under the
Constitution, laws, or treaties of the United States.
28 USC 1332 Diversity of Citizenship; Amount in Controversy; Costs
(a) The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of all civil actions where the matter
in controversy exceeds the sum or value of $75,000, exclusive of interest and costs, and
is between-(1) citizens of different States
PENNOYER
MECHANICS OF JURISDICTION & MODERN PJ
Fed Rules Civ Pro Rule 12 (b)
(b) How to Present Defenses. Every defense to a claim for relief in any pleading must be
asserted in the responsive pleading if one is required. But a party may assert the
following defenses by motion:
(1) lack of subject-matter jurisdiction;
(2) lack of personal jurisdiction;
(3) improper venue;
(4) insufficient process;
(5) insufficient service of process;
(6) failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted; and
(7) failure to join a party under Rule 19.
A motion asserting any of these defenses must be made before pleading if a responsive
pleading is allowed. If a pleading sets out a claim for relief that does not require a
responsive pleading, an opposing party may assert at trial any defense to that claim. No
defense or objection is waived by joining it with one or more other defenses or objections
in a responsive pleading or in a motion.
Fed Rules Civ Pro Rule 12 (g)
(g) Joining Motions.
(1) Right to Join. A motion under this rule may be joined with any other motion allowed
by this rule.
(2) Limitation on Further Motions. Except as provided in Rule 12(h)(2) or (3), a party
that makes a motion under this rule must not make another motion under this rule raising
a defense or objection that was available to the party but omitted from its earlier motion.
IV.
V.
VI.
VII.
IX.
X.
2. ThejudicialPowershallextendtoallCases,inLawandEquity,arising
underthisConstitution,theLawsoftheUnitedStates,andTreaties
made,orwhichshallbemade,undertheirAuthority;toallCasesaffecting
Ambassadors,otherpublicMinistersandConsuls;toallCasesof
admiraltyandmaritimeJurisdiction;toControversiestowhichtheUnited
StatesshallbeaParty;toControversiesbetweentwoormoreStates;
betweenaStateandCitizensofanotherState;betweenCitizensof
differentStates;betweenCitizensofthesameStateclaimingLands
underGrantsofdifferentStates,andbetweenaState,ortheCitizens
thereof,andforeignStates,CitizensorSubjects.
28 USC 1331 Federal Question
The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of all civil actions arising under the
Constitution, laws, or treaties of the United States.
28 USC 1332 Diversity, Amount in Controversy, Costs
(a) The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of all civil actions where the matter
in controversy exceeds the sum or value of $75,000, exclusive of interest and costs, and
is between-(1) citizens of different States;
Rule 12 (b)
(b) How to Present Defenses. Every defense to a claim for relief in any pleading must be
asserted in the responsive pleading if one is required. But a party may assert the
following defenses by motion:
(1) lack of subject-matter jurisdiction;
(2) lack of personal jurisdiction;
(3) improper venue;
(4) insufficient process;
(5) insufficient service of process;
(6) failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted; and
(7) failure to join a party under Rule 19.
A motion asserting any of these defenses must be made before pleading if a
responsive pleading is allowed. If a pleading sets out a claim for relief that does
not require a responsive pleading, an opposing party may assert at trial any
defense to that claim. No defense or objection is waived by joining it with one or
more other defenses or objections in a responsive pleading or in a motion.
Rule 8
(a) Claim for Relief. A pleading that states a claim for relief must contain:
(1) a short and plain statement of the grounds for the court's jurisdiction, unless the court
already has jurisdiction and the claim needs no new jurisdictional support;
SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION PART 2
28 USC 1332 Diversity, Amount in Controversy, Costs
(c) For the purposes of this section and section 1441 of this title-(1) a corporation shall be deemed to be a citizen of every State and foreign state by which
it has been incorporated and of the State or foreign state where it has its principal place of
business,
Rule 12 (b)
4
XI.
(a) Claim for Relief. A pleading that states a claim for relief must contain:
(1) a short and plain statement of the grounds for the court's jurisdiction, unless the court
already has jurisdiction and the claim needs no new jurisdictional support;
Article III Section 2
The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this
Constitution, the Laws of the United States, and Treaties made, or which shall be made,
under their Authority; to all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and
Consuls; to all Cases of admiralty and maritime Jurisdiction; to Controversies to which
the United States shall be a Party; to Controversies between two or more States; between
a State and Citizens of another State; between Citizens of different States; between
Citizens of the same State claiming Lands under Grants of different States, and between a
State, or the Citizens thereof, and foreign States, Citizens or Subjects.
SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION; REMOVAL
Rule 20 Permissive Joinder of Parties
(a)
Persons who may join or be joined
(i)
Plaintiffs. Persons may join in one action as plaintiffs if:
(a)
They assert any right to relief jointly, severally, or in the alternative w/
respect to or arising out of the same transaction, occurrence, or series of
transactions or occurrences; and
(b)
Any question of law or fact common to all plaintiffs will arise in the
action
(ii)
Defendants. Persons as well as a vessel, cargo, or other property subject to
admiralty process in rem may be joined in one action as defendants if:
(a)
Any right to relief is asserted against them jointly, severally, or in the
alternative w/ respect to or arising out of the same transaction, occurrence or
series of transactions or occurrences; and
(b)
Any question of law or fact common to all defendants will arise in the
action
28 USC 1367 Supplemental Jurisdiction
(a) Except as provided in subsections (b) and (c) or as expressly provided otherwise by
Federal statute, in any civil action of which the district courts have original jurisdiction,
the district courts shall have supplemental jurisdiction over all other claims that are so
related to claims in the action within such original jurisdiction that they form part of the
same case or controversy under Article III of the United States Constitution. Such
supplemental jurisdiction shall include claims that involve the joinder or intervention of
additional parties.
(b) In any civil action of which the district courts have original jurisdiction founded
solely onsection 1332 of this title, the district courts shall not have supplemental
jurisdiction under subsection (a) over claims by plaintiffs against persons made parties
under Rule 14, 19, 20, or24 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, or over claims by
persons proposed to be joined as plaintiffs under Rule 19 of such rules, or seeking to
intervene as plaintiffs under Rule 24 of such rules, when exercising supplemental
5
XII.
jurisdiction over such claims would be inconsistent with the jurisdictional requirements
of section 1332.
(c) The district courts may decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over a claim
under subsection (a) if-(1) the claim raises a novel or complex issue of State law,
(2) the claim substantially predominates over the claim or claims over which the
district court has original jurisdiction,
(3) the district court has dismissed all claims over which it has original
jurisdiction, or
(4) in exceptional circumstances, there are other compelling reasons for declining
jurisdiction.
(d) The period of limitations for any claim asserted under subsection (a), and for any
other claim in the same action that is voluntarily dismissed at the same time as or after
the dismissal of the claim under subsection (a), shall be tolled while the claim is pending
and for a period of 30 days after it is dismissed unless State law provides for a longer
tolling period.
28 USC 1441 Removal of Civil Actions
(a) Generally.--Except as otherwise expressly provided by Act of Congress, any civil
action brought in a State court of which the district courts of the United States have
original jurisdiction, may be removed by the defendant or the defendants, to the district
court of the United States for the district and division embracing the place where such
action is pending.
(b) Removal based on diversity of citizenship.
(1) In determining whether a civil action is removable on the basis of the
jurisdiction under section 1332(a) of this title, the citizenship of defendants sued
under fictitious names shall be disregarded.
(2) A civil action otherwise removable solely on the basis of the jurisdiction
under section 1332(a) of this title may not be removed if any of the parties in
interest properly joined and served as defendants is a citizen of the State in which
such action is brought.
CHOICE OF LAW ERIE DOCTRINE
Rule 3
A civil action is commenced by filing a complaint with the court.
Rule 23.1
(a) Prerequisites. This rule applies when one or more shareholders or members of a
corporation or an unincorporated association bring a derivative action to enforce a right
that the corporation or association may properly assert but has failed to enforce. The
derivative action may not be maintained if it appears that the plaintiff does not fairly and
adequately represent the interests of shareholders or members who are similarly situated
in enforcing the right of the corporation or association.
(b) Pleading Requirements. The complaint must be verified and must:
(1) allege that the plaintiff was a shareholder or member at the time of the
transaction complained of, or that the plaintiff's share or membership later
devolved on it by operation of law;
(2) allege that the action is not a collusive one to confer jurisdiction that the court
would otherwise lack; and
6
XIII.
XIV.
XV.
Rule 65(a)
(a) Preliminary Injunction.
(1) Notice. The court may issue a preliminary injunction only on notice to the adverse
party.
(2) Consolidating the Hearing with the Trial on the Merits. Before or after beginning
the hearing on a motion for a preliminary injunction, the court may advance the trial on
the merits and consolidate it with the hearing. Even when consolidation is not ordered,
evidence that is received on the motion and that would be admissible at trial becomes part
of the trial record and need not be repeated at trial. But the court must preserve any
party's right to a jury trial.
11A Fed. Prac. & Proc. Civ. 2951
When the opposing party actually receives notice of the application for a restraining
order, the procedure that is followed does not differ functionally from that on an
application for a preliminary injunction and the proceeding is not subject to any special
requirements.7 Indeed, even if a court denominates an order as a temporary restraining
order in this situation,8 Rule 65(b) may not apply and, if there is an adversary hearing or
the order is entered for an indeterminate length of time, the temporary restraining order
may be treated as a preliminary injunction
28 USC 1292 Interlocutory Decisions
(a) Except as provided in subsections (c) and (d) of this section, the courts of appeals
shall have jurisdiction of appeals from:
(1) Interlocutory orders of the district courts of the United States, the United States
District Court for the District of the Canal Zone, the District Court of Guam, and the
District Court of the Virgin Islands, or of the judges thereof, granting, continuing,
modifying, refusing or dissolving injunctions, or refusing to dissolve or modify
injunctions, except where a direct review may be had in the Supreme Court;
CLAIM PRECLUSION
Rule 13(a) Compulsory Counterclaim.
(1) In General. A pleading must state as a counterclaim any claim that--at the time of its
service--the pleader has against an opposing party if the claim:
(A) arises out of the transaction or occurrence that is the subject matter of the
opposing party's claim; and
(B) does not require adding another party over whom the court cannot acquire
jurisdiction.
(2) Exceptions. The pleader need not state the claim if:
(A) when the action was commenced, the claim was the subject of another
pending action; or
(B) the opposing party sued on its claim by attachment or other process that did
not establish personal jurisdiction over the pleader on that claim, and the pleader
does not assert any counterclaim under this rule.
XIX.
a) In general. A party asserting a claim, counterclaim, crossclaim or third-party claim may join,
as independent or alternative claims, as many claims as it has against an opposing party
Rule 42 Consolidation; Separate Trials
b) Separate trials. For convenience, to avoid predjudice, or to expedite and economize, the court
may order a separate trial of one or more separate issues, claims, crossclaims, counterclaims
or third-party claims. When ordering a separate trial, the court must preserve any federal right
to a jury trial.
Rule 20. Permissive Joinder of Parties
a) Persons who may join or be joined.
2) Defendants. Persons- as well as a vessel, cargo, or other property subject to admiralty
process in rem- may be joined in one action as defendants if:
A. Any right to relief is asserted against them jointly, severally, or in the
alternative with respect to arising or out of the same transaction, occurrence,
or series of transactions or occurrences; and
B.
Any question of law or fact common to all defendants will arise
in the action.
28 USC 1367 - Supplemental jurisdiction
a) Except as provided in subsections (b) and (c) or as expressly provided otherwise by
Federal statute, in any civil action of which the district courts have original jurisdiction,
the district courts shall have supplemental jurisdiction over all other claims that are so
related to claims in the action within such original jurisdiction that they form part of the
same case or controversy under Article III of the United States Constitution. Such
supplemental jurisdiction shall include claims that involve the joinder or intervention of
additional parties.
b) In any civil action of which the district courts have original jurisdiction founded solely on
section 1332 of this title, the district courts shall not have supplemental jurisdiction under
subsection (a) over claims by plaintiffs against persons made parties under Rule 14, 19,
20, or 24 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, or over claims by persons proposed to
be joined as plaintiffs under Rule 19 of such rules, or seeking to intervene as plaintiffs
under Rule 24 of such rules, when exercising supplemental jurisdiction over such claims
would be inconsistent with the jurisdictional requirements of section 1332.
JOINDER OF CLAIMS BY DEFENDANT; PERMISSIVE JOINDER OF PARTIES
Rule 13
a) Compulsory counterclaim
1) In general. A pleading must state as a counterclaim any claim that- at the time of
its service the pleader has against an opposing party if the claim:
A.
Arises out of the transaction or occurrence that is the subject
matter of the opposing partys claim; and
B.
Does not require adding another party over whom the
court cannot acquire jurisdiction.
2) Exceptions. The pleader need not state the claim if:
A.
When the action was commenced, the claim was the subject of
another pending action; or
B.
The opposing party sued in its claim by attachment or
other process that did not establish personal jurisdiction over the pleader
on that claim, and the pleader does not assert any counterclaim under this
rule.
10
XX.
11