Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ROCKBURST CONDITIONS
W. F. Bawden, Chair Lassonde Mineral Engineering Division, University of Toronto
S. Jones, Senior Ground Control Engineer, Williams Operating Corporation, Marathon,
Ontario
ABSTRACT
In order to maintain a production rate of 6,000 tonnes per day from underground at the
Williams Operating corporation, two independent mining areas were required which
created a long narrow sill pillar between them. During initial mining of the sill pillar there
were a number of significant ground falls and in March 1999, with no active mining
ongoing in the sill pillar area, a rockburst of magnitude 3.0 Nuttli occurred. Extensive
ground support was designed and installed to withstand another event of similar
magnitude. A mine wide microseismic system was installed to monitor mine induced
seismic behaviour over the entire mine. The area most directly affected by the 1999
rockburst was rehabilitated using a highly ductile support design. Along with the
microseismic instrumentation the areas were instrumented using SMART Cables and
SMART MPBXs. Since that time this area has been impacted by four additional seismic
events of generally similar magnitude. The ground support has performed very well
during these events and the combined microseismic and conventional instrumentation has
permitted full evaluation of degree and aerial extent of damage to the support. This has
permitted a surgical rehabilitation approach which has allowed very good rehabilitation
cost control in this area. The paper discusses the nature of the large seismic events, the
ductile support design applied, the nature and degree of damage to the ground support
and infrastructure and the rehabilitation that was applied.
1. INTRODUCTION
Instrumented SMART cable technology was introduced in 1997 [Bawden et al, 1997] and
is patented in Canada, the USA, Australia, South Africa and Europe. Bawden [2001]
describes the development of this technology which has achieved increasing application
in mining and civil engineering projects. SMART cable bolt instruments have two major
impacts on mining operations:
1. cost savings through optimized support design and through control and
minimization of rehabilitation, and
2. improved safety under both static and dynamic loading conditions.
The impact of instrumented cable bolt support on mine safety can be dramatic. The
importance of this aspect tends to increase exponentially with increasing mining
extraction [and therefore with increasing mine induced stress] and for operations
susceptible to rockburst events [Bawden et al, 2000]. SMART cable technology has been
applied in an extensive program to manage risk in a strongly rockburst prone mining
block at the Williams Operating Corporation. This application is discussed in the
remainder of this paper.
WI LL IA MS
M IN E
W EST
E AS T
B LO CK 3
G O LD E N
G IA N T M IN E
B LO C K 3 - 4 SI L L P ILL AR
B LO CK 4
Figure # 2: Criteria for the design of support in bursting ground: (a) Static strength factor
(b) Energy capacity (c) Wall displacements [After Rockburst Research Program
handbook, 1995]
2.3 Instrumentation Program
While the capacity and ductility of the support system was believed adequate at the time
of installation, it was recognized that due to the high stress nature of the sill area
combined with continued stress transfer from surrounding active mining areas the support
system capacity could gradually be consumed, adversely impacting the factor of safety
over time. A comprehensive monitoring program was established in order to evaluate
when and if additional support would be required in order to maintain an adequate safety
standard in this high risk area. The monitoring system consisted of three components:
(i) SMART cables were installed as part of the cable design in each intersection on the
9450, 9390 and parts of the 9370 and 9415 levels. Occasional SMART MPBX
instruments were installed to depths exceeding the depth of the cable support on each
level to check for possible deformations beyond the maximum depth of ground support
installed.
(ii) A temporary 8 channel portable microseismic system was installed in the Block 4 sill
area in the summer of 1999.This was replaced with a 64 channel mine wide microseismic
monitoring system in the fall of 2000. This system has its highest event resolution in the
sill area.
(iii) Regular visual inspections of ground conditions are conducted through the sill area.
3. SEISMIC ACTIVITY IN THE SILL SUBSEQUENT TO MARCH 1999, 3.0 Mn
EVENT
Six large seismic events have occurred in the Block 4 sill area since the March 1999, 3.0
Mn event. No direct mining was being conducted in the sill during this time period. The
date and magnitude of all large seismic events that have affected the sill to date are listed
in Table #1.
Table 1: Seismic Events in Block 4 Sill
DATE
March 29, 1999
December 17, 1999
January 8, 2000
July 28, 2000
April 22, 2001
June 28, 2001
Subsequent to the March 1999 event the sill area has been monitored for mine induced
seismicity and with instrumented SMART cables and MPBXs. The performance of the
ground support system under the dynamic loading conditions resulting from the seismic
events listed in Table # 2 are described below.
3.1 December 17, 1999, 2.6 Mn and January 8, 2000, 1.6 & 1.7 Mn Events
Figure # 3 shows a longitudinal section of the sill showing all mine induced seismic
events for the period of December 17 19, 1999. The strong clustering of events in the
east half of the sill around the 9415 level [the level that suffered the most intense damage
from the March 29, 1999, 3.0 Mn event and which was ultimately abandoned] is evident.
The 9450 level, located 25 meters above this, had been well instrumented with SMART
cable bolts in each cross cut intersection. This event resulted in sharp load increase from
the # 19 through the # 24 intersections with cable loads increasing to as much as as 70%
of yield [Bawden et al, 2000]. None of the instrumented SMART cables indicated any
load increase due to the January 8, 2000, seismic events. Additionally there was no
visible damage to the fresh shotcrete support due to any of these events.
Figure # 4: Block 3 4 sill 48 hour seismicity following July 28, 2000 Mn 2.8
rockburst
Figure # 5: 48 hour seismicity following July 28, 2000, Mn 2.8 rockburst for a 10m
interval on the 9415 (a) and 9390 (b) levels.
Load vs Date/Time - 18 Intersection - 9415 Level
30
25
20
Load
15
July 28,
2000, Mn
2.8 Event
10
0
23-May-00
31-Aug-00
9-Dec-00
19-Mar-01
27-Jun-01
5-Oct-01
13-Jan-02
-5
Date/Time
Node 1 - Node 2
Node 2 - Node 3
Node 3 - Node 4
Node 4 - Node 5
Node 5 - Node 6
Node 6 - Head
10
July 28,
2000, 2.8
Mn event
Load
0
23-May-00
31-Aug-00
9-Dec-00
19-Mar-01
27-Jun-01
5-Oct-01
13-Jan-02
-2
Date/Time
Node 1 - Node 2
Node 2 - Node 3
Node 3 - Node 4
Node 4 - Node 5
Node 5 - Node 6
Node 6 - Head
Mn event failure zone [Figure # 5]. The major cable bolt load increase occurred at the
#24 X-cut-footwall drive intersection where the twin strand cables were taken to rupture
at a depth of 2 3 m into the back [Figure # 10]. Cable loads decreased to the east and
west of this area. Figure # 11 shows the response of the SMART cable in the # 27
intersection, immediately adjacent to the # 28 30 cave area. Load on cables in this area
is minimal and the cables have not responded directly to any of the large seismic events
since their installation in January 2000. Local time dependent damage to the shotcrete
support on the 9390 level, composed of spall and cracking, was documented over the
following 1 6 days primarily between the # 23 and # 25 intersections.
Figure # 8: Block 3 4 sill 48 hour seismicity following June 28, 2001, 3.1 Mn rockburst
50
Displacement
40
30
20
10
0
12-Jan-00
21-Apr-00
30-Jul-00
7-Nov-00
15-Feb-01
26-May-01
3-Sep-01
12-Dec-01
-10
Date/Time
Node 1 - Toe
Node 2 - Toe
Node 3 - Toe
Node 4 - Toe
Node 5 - Toe
Node 6 - Toe
Figure # 10: 9390 level SMART cable displacement time data for the # 24 X-cut
intersection
Displacement
0
12-Jan-00
21-Apr-00
30-Jul-00
7-Nov-00
15-Feb-01
26-May-01
3-Sep-01
12-Dec-01
-1
Date/Time
Node 1 - Toe
Node 2 - Toe
Node 3 - Toe
Node 4 - Toe
Node 5 - Toe
Node 6 - Toe
Figure # 11: 9390 level SMART cable displacement time data - # 27 intersection
4. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS
Since March 1999 the Block 3 4 sill pillar at the Williams Operating Corporation has
experienced a number of large rockburst events ranging in magnitude from about 1.6 to >
3.0 Mn. These events are believed to be occurring as fault slip events along a foliation
shear structure located 40 m south of the footwall haulage development.
With the first Mn 3.0 event of March, 1999, damage occurred over a 150 m x 150 m area
supported using normal primary support. Near the assumed event epicenter severe
damage occurred resulting in abandonment of a 140 m long section of haulage drive. A
high capacity/high ductility support system was subsequently designed and implemented
throughout those portions of the sill assessed to be at high seismic risk. This support
system has survived subsequent large seismic events in the sill while incurring minimal
visible damage to the sill development. Instrumented SMART cable bolts have responded
in direct proportion to the magnitude of the seismic events:
1.6 1.7 Mn no response
2.2 Mn measured but minimal load change no immediate rehabilitation
required
> 3.0 Mn direct load increase of up to 20 tonnes/twin strand installation cables
replaced throughout loaded area to re-establish required factor of safety.
The combined seismic and SMART instrument program has permitted immediate
assessment of the degree and extent of damage resulting from more recent seismic events.
The instrumentation has allowed definition of the exact location and amount of support
capacity consumed in each seismic event. This has then permitted a surgical
rehabilitation approach. The result has been:
no production interruptions,
minimized rehabilitation cost, and
maintenance of desired safety factor throughout the sill area.
Since 1999 seismic activity in the sill has shifted from east to west and down from the
9415 to the 9390 level. Figure 9 shows seismic activity restricted to the footwall area in
the east sill but occurring throughout the footwall and the ore in the west sill. Damage
from the more recent events has also shifted west and down. This data suggests that the
east sill has become aseismic and may have yielded. SMART cable data from the # 27
intersection immediately adjacent to the # 28-30 cave area indicates that this area has not
responded to any of the seismic events in the sill, suggesting that this area may have
yielded at the time of the # 28 30 cave. The combined data suggests that the present
area of highest seismic risk in the sill is located between the # 23 and the # 26
intersections on the 9390 level.
The data shows strong time dependence in the seismic, damage and support load
behaviour in the sill. After the larger seismic events [>2.8 Mn] seismicity is generally
observed to take 8 weeks to return to background levels. Shotcrete damage following
the latest 3.1 Mn event occurred over a 1 6 day period. Cable bolt loads generally show
an immediate response to the larger seismic events. In some cases cable loads have
stabilized immediately following such events and in others they have continued to
gradually increase.
5. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors wish to thank the Williams Operating Corporation for permission to publish
this data
6. REFERENCES
Bawden, W. F., Lausch, P., and Dennison, S. 2000. Lessons in control of mine costs from
instrumented cable bolt support studies. In Proceedings, 4th North American Rock
Mechanics Society Symposium. Seattle, U.S.A. A.A. Balkema. Pp 633-641
De Graff, P., Hyett, A. J., Bawden, W. F. and Yao, M. 2000. Investigations into the
distribution of load along long cable bolts a field trial using SMART technology, an
aid to successful ground support design. In Proceedings of the 9th Congress of the
International Society of Rock Mechanics. A. A. Balkema. Pp 1273-1277
Gauthier, P. 2000. Cable bolt optimization at Mine Bousquet. In Proceedings 15th Ground
Control Colloque. Association Miniere du Quebec
LeBlanc, B and Murdoch , G. 2000. Costs associated with sill pillar mining at Williams
Mine. In proceedings, Annual General Meeting, Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy
and Petroleum. Toronto, Canada
Nelson D. A., Hyett, A. J. and Dennison, S. 2000. Cable performance in the 1854E
Hangingwall at Campbell Mine. In Proceedings Annual General Meeting, Canadian
Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum. CD-ROM