Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ISSN 1866-7511
Arab J Geosci
DOI 10.1007/s12517-013-1109-9
123
123
DOI 10.1007/s12517-013-1109-9
ORIGINAL PAPER
M. R. Shalaby
M. H. Hakimi (*)
Shoushan Basin
e-mail: ibnalhakimi@yahoo.com
Introduction
W. H. Abdullah
Lumpur, Malaysia
Geological setting
Fig. 1 Location map of Mesozoic Shoushan Basin in the north Western Desert of Egypt, including studied fields
Arab J Geosci
porosity.
personal communication)
Modelling procedure
Basin modelling has been successfully applied to some implotted at relatively higher hydrogen index (201261 mg HC/g
basin. The burial history was established using the stratigraph9). Maturity does affect the hydrogen index of the samples and
ic record of the region. Burial depths and lithological charachydrocarbon generation relatively decreases hydrogen index;
borehole data: event (e.g. deposition, erosion, hiatus or nonday generation potential and not the original source rock gen-
Shoushan Basin (Fig. 1), the Middle Jurassic coaly shales and
and gas in the Shoushan Basin.
Fig. 5), which meet the standard as a source rock with good to
In this study, Shams Field has been selected as a representative
Kerogen typing carried out on whole-rock samples using orhydrocarbon generation potential of Khatatba source rock is
sporinite, bituminite and amorphous (Fig. 7cf). Under ultra(9575 Ma; Fig. 11). The Khatatba source rock reached the
matter (bituminite) (Fig. 7e, f). Pyrite and quartz are the main
drocarbon generation started in the Late Cretaceous (90 Ma),
Fig. 3 Location map of the main Mesozoic basins in the Western Desert, showing the Shoushan Bain. The enlarged area shows the pattern of
structures and main faults in the Shoushan Basin
Reservoir rocks
Fig. 4 Khatatba Formation type log (Shams NE-1 well) showing the petroleum system
elements of the Khatatba Formation. Hydrocarbon-bearing reservoirs, source rock and seal
intervals are highlighted
Fig. 5 Distribution of total organic carbon content (TOC weight percent) versus depths (in metres) for Khatatba samples in the Shoushan Basin.
Most of the samples plotted in the good to excellent source area
range from 0.05 to 1,000 mD (Fig. 14). The porosity types are
predominately intergranular pores (Fig. 16a) and affected by
compaction and formation of authigenic cements and clays
Fig. 7 Photomicrographs of macerals from Khatatba Formation under oil immersion, reflected light.
a High bitumen staining associated with vitrinite phytoclasts (VR). b Inorganic compound of pyrite
(Py) associated with clay minerals. c Liptinite (LIP) associated with vitrinite (VR) and clay
minerals. d As c with incident ultraviolet light, showing unstructured amorphous organic matter
fluorescing greenish-yellow. e High concentration of fluorescing sporinite. f Unstructured organic
matter (bituminite) fluorescing orange to yellow associated with clay minerals
Trap Formation
unconformities (Sultan and Abdulhalim 1988, personal communication; Fig. 18). These traps developed during the early
Mesozoic Alpine orogenic phase (Schlumberger 1995, personal communication) synchronously with the opening of the
Tethys (El- Shazly 1977; Hantar 1990). This tectonic event
caused formation of the coastal basins including the Shoushan
Fig. 9 Vitrinite reflectance data versus depth for the stratigraphic units including Khatatba
Formation; a Shams 2X well and b Shams NE well
Fig. 10 Predicted transformation of source rock kerogens versus maturity according to the Genex model (line), at a geological heating rate of 3.3
K/Ma, compared with estimates based on source rock data. Transformation of kerogen to oil for type II Kimmeridge shale (circle symbol) and
Khatatba samples (diamond symbol) (modified after Stainforth 2009)
Fig. 11 Reconstructed burial history curves with hydrocarbon generation zone for the Khatatba Formation in Shams Field, Shoushan Basin
(Shalaby et al. 2011)
Fig. 12 Calculated (cumulative model) of transformation ratios and hydrocarbon generation from the Khatatba Formation in Shams Field,
Shoushan Basin (Shalaby et al. 2011)
Discussion
Fig. 14 Thin section photomicrographs of sandstones in the Khatatba Formation depicting the common cements recognized in the Khatatba sandstones: a
syntaxial quartz overgrowth which eventually acts as pore-occluding phase, decreasing porosity and permeability; b calcite developed in the intergranular
pore and completely blocking the pore spaces; c authigenic kaolinite filling in the intergranular pore spaces; d SEM photomicrograph showing
intergranular pore occluding clusters of vermicular kaolinite between quartz grains
Fig. 15 Cross plot of core permeability versus porosity of the Khatatba sandstones in three fields, Shoushan Basin
Fig. 17 Plots of corrected bottom-hole temperatures versus depths for studied wells in the
Shams Field, Shoushan Basin (calculated (lines) and measured (symbols))
Fig. 18 Schematic northwestsoutheast geo-seismic cross section showing two representative trapping styles and general structural style across
Shoushan Basin (modified after Al-Sharhan and Abd El-Gawad 2008)
Fig. 19 Events chart of the Khatatba-Khatatba (!) petroleum system in the Shoushan Basin showing the essential elements and processes
(generation, migration and accumulation)
Conclusions
References
Zein El-din MY, Abd El-Gawad EA, ElShayb HM, Haddad IA (2001) Geological
studies and hydrocarbon potentialities of the