ASSIGNMENT 1: Authentic Task Critical Assessment

Using the articles as listed below:

Dostaler, I & Tomberlin, T 2013, The Great Divide Between Business School Research
and Business Practice, The Canadian Journal of Higher Education, vol. 43, no. 1, pp.
115-128.
Greer, C & Hitt, M 2012, The value of research and its evaluation in business schools:
killing the goose that laid the golden egg? Journal of Management Inquiry, vol. 21, no. 2,
pp. 236-240.
Critically analyses these two articles ensuring you answer the following questions:
1. What is the basis for the argument presented?
The Great Divide Between Business School Research and Business Practice presented this text
describes the talk on the connection of scientific business analysis that may be found within the
widespread business press and also the tutorial literature, and suggests variety of structural and
cultural changes to increase the connection of business analysis and its impact on follow.
The value of research and its evaluation in business schools: killing the goose that laid the
golden egg?
Such criticism of donnish analysis, as hostile applied analysis, resonates with detractors World
Health Organization don't appreciate the evolving role of business colleges in providing
foundational analysis. The authors contend that donnish analysis helps develop information in
fields like strategic management, enhances the worth of later applied analysis, and provides
content for courses. Not all analysis is of prime quality, however, that the analysis of analysis is

crucial. The authors examine many issues for analysis, like journal rankings, knowledge base
analysis, and breadth of approach.
2. What approach was used to support their argument?
The Great Divide between Business School Research and Business Practice has used research
bureaus approach to support their argument.
And The value of research and its evaluation in business schools: killing the goose that laid the
golden egg? has used examine several considerations for evaluation, such as journal rankings,
interdisciplinary evaluation, and breadth of approach.
3. Is the argument presented well supported? Why or why not? What are the key messages
contained in the respective articles? How are these messages relevant to your studies?
The Great Divide between Business School Research and Business Practice is great supported
we have argued that a discrepancy between business analysis and business practice exists and is
widening. More analysis is required to judge the magnitude of this discrepancy. for instance, it'd
be fascinating to seem at the topics of the research masters and academic degree theses over the
recent past in a very sample of business colleges from round the world and to judge their degree
of utility. Similarly, a detailed comparison of the foremost well-liked textbooks presently
employed in core college man and master's degree courses (strategy, marketing, accounting,
finance, human resource, so on) with those that were used ten or twenty years past may even be
informative. This textbook review may focus on the examples employed by a newer generation
of authors compared to earlier ones and judge the extent to that they're able to illustrate theories
with stories that they themselves have witnessed.

they discuss the worth of management analysis and its role within the analysis of business
colleges. The paper is termed, the worth of analysis and Its analysis in Business Schools: Killing
the Goose That set the Golden Egg? Even if I in person don't believe all the arguments, i feel that
the paper may spur a pleasant discussion. The reason? it's 1) meant to be provocative, 2) it
connects to a number of the previous discussions we've got had on management analysis, and 3)
it may be associated with the continuing AACSB enfranchisement.
Worth noting is that the paper was one in all the foremost well browse articles in Management
Inquiry
4. What are the strengths and weaknesses of each article?
The Great Divide between Business School Research and Business Practice
Strength: Business instructors victimization the case methodology of teaching need that students
analyze an appointed teaching case to be mentioned at school. Teaching cases describe business
situations however don't seem to be meant to demonstrate effective or ineffective handling of
managerial issues
Weakness: No weakness
The value of research and its evaluation in business schools: killing the goose that laid the
golden egg?
Strength: they discuss the value of management research and its role in the evaluation of
business schools.
Weakness: No weakness

5. Which would you consider to be the better article and what is the basis for you reaching
this conclusion?
The Great Divide between Business School Research and Business Practice is better article the
yankee Association of collegial colleges of Business was later renamed the Association to
Advance collegial colleges of Business (AACSB) to higher reflect its international reach. The
mission of the AACSB is to contribute to the improvement of management education worldwide
principally through a proper business school certification method. Further proof of the gap
between business analysis and business observe ought to be gathered to foster consensus among
graduate school, students, alumni, directors, and advisers that the gap is so widening. Once
accord is reached, we will hope that the mandatory structural and cultural changes might be
enforced in business colleges.
6. What have you learned by reading these articles? What is the benefit of what you have
Learned? What is the cost of what you have learned?
The Great Divide between Business School Research and Business Practice
Junior grad school school play this enduring system well. They learn timely, even throughout
their student studies, what's expected from them. They fine perceive that writing education cases
or practician articles won't get them promoted. The concern of getting their tenure application
turned down by their departments could be a powerful motivator. Business colleges that don't
have tenure systems could however have interaction in competition with different colleges
through the assorted rankings (Adler & Harzing, 2009), rankings that square measure
currently virtually not possible to avoid. Such rankings send the signals that only a restricted

variety of journals count. Management school WHO will solely publish in all the other
journals could simply want poor cousins within the tutorial family.
The value of research and its evaluation in business schools: killing the goose that laid the
golden egg?
Eleanor Westney, UN agency target-hunting United States of America in our growing
appreciation of however institutional theory, and additional necessary, institutional
entrepreneurships might justify the dynamics among our field. we tend to conjointly owe an
enormous debt of feeling to Troy Anderson for his multiple readings and elaborated suggestions
on what had to alter to create the paper work. additionally, we might wish to give thanks
numerous|the numerous} those that scan various iterations of the paper and liberally offered their
perspective, suggestions, and encouragement, includingAriane Berthoin Antal, Art Bedeian,
Howard Browman, Michelle Buck, Christina Cregan, Lothringen Eden, Ax-ele Giroud, Carol
Kulik, Yadong Luo, Steve Maguire, David Merrett, Niels Noorderhaven, West Chadic van der
Wal, Jim Walsh, Sri Zaheer, and Tatiana Zalan. we tend to area unit grateful to mountain
Arbaugh, Myrtle Bell, and Jonathan do, the new AMLE editorial team, for his or her
knowledgeable selections in however best to gift the set of concepts to the general public.
7. What will you do differently in the future as a result of your learnings?
The value of research and its evaluation in business schools: killing the goose that laid the
golden egg?
With the addition of associate degree institutional perspective, Rich's suggestions took the paper
so much on the far side its initial, additional circumscribed appreciation of the dynamics at play.
we have a tendency to give thanks Eleanor Westney, World Health Organization guided USA in

our growing appreciation of however institutional theory, and additional necessary, institutional
entrepreneurship might make a case for the dynamics among our field.
The Great Divide between Business School Research and Business Practice Starkey et al.
(2009) would probably claim that a lot of alternative shops (either written or internet based)
would welcome such contributions, contributions that ought to be thought of as scientific and
rigorous as the monetary Times list of high journals. a tendency to believe that major structural
changes are needed within the world of business faculties for such claims to become typical
knowledge. Additional necessary, institutional entrepreneurships might justify the dynamics
inside our field.
References

Adler, N. J., & Harzing, A. W. (2009). When knowledge wins: Transcending the sense
and nonsense in academic rankings. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 8,

7295.
AACSB International. (2008). Final report of the AACSB International Impact of

Research Task Force. Retrieved from http://www.aacsb.edu.

Bartunek, J. M., & Rynes, S. L. (2010). The Construction and Contributions of
Implications for Practice: Whats in Them and What Might They Offer? Academy of

Management Learning & Education, 9, 100117.

Bower, J. L. (1970). Managing the resource allocation process. Boston, MA: Harvard

Business School Press.

Daniel, C. A. (2009, November 8). How two national reports ruined business schools.
Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved from http://chronicle.com/article/HowTwoNational-Reports/49055/ Duguay, C. R. (1998). Lcole Minville. Montreal, QC: Les
cahiers des leons inaugurales.

Hodgkinson, G. P., & Rousseau, D. M. (2009). Bridging the rigour-relevance gap in

management research: Its already happening! Journal of Management Studies, 46(3),

534546.
Ito, J. K., & Brotheridge, C. M. (2007). Predicting individual research productivity: More

than a question of time. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 37(1), 125.

Khurana, R. (2007). From higher aims to hired hands: The social transformation of
American business schools and the unfulfilled promise of management as a profession.
Princeton, NJ, and Oxford, England: Princeton University Press. Kieser, A., & Leiner, L.

(2009).
Kieser, A., & Leiner, L. (2009). Why the rigour-relevance gap in management research is

unbridgeable. Journal of Management Studies, 46(3), 516533.

Leenders, M. R., Mauffette-Leenders, L. A., & Erskine, J. A. (2001). Writing cases.

London, ON: Ivey.

Luhmann, N. (1995). Social systems. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Macdonald, S., & Kam, J. (2007). Ring a ring o roses: Quality journals and

gamesmanship in management studies. Journal of Management Studies, 44(4), 640655.

Markides, C. (2007). In search of ambidextrous professors. Academy of Management
Journal, 50, 762768. OBrien, J. P., Drnevich, P. L., Crook, T. R., & Armstrong, C. E.
(2010). Does business school research add economic value for students? Academy of

Management Learning & Education, 9, 638651.

Rynes, S. L., Bartunek, J. M., & Daft, R. L. (2001). Across the great divide: Knowledge
creation and transfer between practitioners and academics. Academy of Management

Journal, 44, 340355.

Schmalensee, R. (2006, November 27). Wheres the B in B-schools? Business Week,
118. Segal, D. (2011, November 20). What they dont teach law students: Lawyering. The

New York Times, A1.

Vermeulen, F. (2005). On rigor and relevance: Fostering dialectic progress in
management research. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 978982.