Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Introduction: -
circuit.
parts
of
power
explained as
conditional
of
power
supply
to the
consumers.
In
important
sub-
in
the
situation of an isolator if
stability
system.
required to be operated in
stations
operated/controlled
at
condition
power
Central
Stations
interruption or reconnection
(CCS).
avoid
in
the
improper
switching
the
system.
i.e.
For
the
these
Control
are
the
isolator.
this
interlock
schemes
with
provided
equipment is considered as a
practical
design
for
and
Common
among
in
the
the
system,
isolators
Because
Bus
Bar
dealt
circuit breaker.
with
relevant
advantages
and
in identical positions.
disadvantages.
Common
Conditions of Interlocks:
the
Arrangements: -
For performing an
operation of any isolator /
breaker / contact switch etc.,
interlocking
scheme
Bus
Bar
to the operation.
6. A circuit breaker
are
Arrangement
required to be maintained.
Double
Arrangement
explained below.
motion
logical
conditions
1. An isolator in series
breaker
remains
in
OFF
the system.
condition.
2.
The
power
8.
An
isolator
for
Two
connected
current interruption.
synchronization.
Proper
protection
10.
bus
arrangement (Fig. A)
This
arrangement
is
different
without
Similarly
4.
Bar
interruption or reconnection
isolator.
Bus
two
bus
section
isolator
Interlock Scheme:
29
(Main
system: - (Fig. C)
operated,
be
only
when
52L
(Line
when
the
KV
sub-station.
This
combines
operation
maintenance
interruption
manually
Earth
be
the system.
of
operated.
So,
- (Fig. B)
It helps the continuity
must
this
with
in
ease
without
and
bus,
without
2. L1 isolator can be
very
country.
Switch
simplicity
sometimes
becomes complicated.
simple
understood.
and
easily
Equipments Involved
Remarks
For interlock
Main Bus isolator (29M)
2. E/switch (29E)
Transfer isolator (29T)
* Suppose transfer
B/C
3. E/S (29E)
without protection
required to be avoided.
isolator of Transformer/Main
(Fig. D)
power
system
two
convenient
breaker.
flow
will
result
It
eliminates
offers
to
take
any
Equipments Involved
Remarks
For interlock
Line isolator (29L1)
2. E/switch (29E)
present
bus B/C
system
3. E/S (29E)
(29M1)
(29M2)
** Detail logic
The
Main
Bus
system,
the
required
condition.
The
bus
three
(a) Path
52L
52B
29B
(b) path
29M2
52B
Isolators of other
Feeders
29M2
(c) Path
29B
52B
52L
29B
29M2
29M2
29M2(Own)
29M1
(d) path
29M2
29M2
52B
52B
Note: -
1.
2.
5. 52B
3.
Bus
Coupler
Breaker
the
52B1
B2
52B2
29M
52L
29L
Fig. A
Fig. B
29M
29M1
52L
52B
52B
29L
29T
29M2
Fig. D
Fig.C
29L1
29B
29A
29TBC-A
52B
29B
29TBC-B
52L
52TBC
29TBC-C
29D
29C
Fig. E
52L
two
(systems), simultaneously in
can
emergency requirement.
different
sources
also
be
availed
Equipments Involved
Remarks
For interlock
Main Bus Isolator (29A)
(29C)
29TBC-C
of power flow
for
Bus Isolator-I
Bus Isolator-II
52
29TBC-C
Transfer
B/C
TBC-
Transfer
Breaker
2
9
2
10
1
10
11
11
12
7
Number Notation in the circuit
1- 29A
4-29D
6-29TBC-A
2-29B
5-29E
3-29C
B/C
10
equipments
high cost.
controlling station.
become
very
an
of
Interlock
Supervision
the
interlocks.
By
of
signals
for
smooth
operation
equipments.
the
Relay
(ISR)
network,
this
correct
of
and
the
relay
Basic design
For the development
2. Availability of auxiliary
3. Requirement of power
be considered.
contacts
design,
1. Involvement of equipments
contacts.
From
flow.
and
From
these
ordinary
above
as
every
per
the
involved
11
about
the
relay
system.
as
are
Interlock Scheme is
system.
conscious
every
operation
per
the
scheme
equipment,
the
the
The
interlocking
interlocking
Conclusion: -
organization
should
Because
of
the
for
doing
the
12
in
the
power
situation of an isolator if
required to be operated in
stations
operated/controlled
at
Central
Stations
stability
system.
(CCS).
condition
power
interlock
schemes
with
interruption or reconnection
practical
design
for
isolator.
equipment is considered as a
Common
avoid
switching
dealt
provided
advantages
and
disadvantages.
of
circuit.
consumers.
among
parts
in
of
the
improper
in
the
the
system,
isolators
conditional
the
system.
power
In
i.e.
For
the
Because
supply
important
this
to the
sub-
these
Control
are
the
Bus
with
Bar
relevant
and
13
this
mentioned
Bar arrangements.
of an Interlock Supervision
Relay
Author
article
has
of
(ISR)
for
14
Dtd. 21.07.2003
From
P.K.PATTANAIK
Asst. Manager (Elect.)
E&MR Divn. BURLA
GRIDCO, Sambalpur-768017
Email ppk110 @ rediffmail.com
prasanta_ pattanaik@yahoo.com
Contacts
Ph. (0663)-2430514,2430512(O)
- 2431232 (R )
FAX- (0663)- 2430160 (O )
To,
The Editor, IEEMA Journal
501,Kakad Chambers,
132, Dr. A.Besant Road
WORLI, MUMBAI-400018
P. K. Pattanaik
15
From
P.K.PATTANAIK
Asst. Manager (Elect.)
E&MR Divn. BURLA
GRIDCO, Sambalpur-768017
Email ppk110 @ rediffmail.com
prasanta_ pattanaik@yahoo.com
Contacts
Ph. (0663)-2430514,2430512(O)
- 2431232 (R )
FAX- (0663)- 2430160 (O )
To,
The Editor, IEEMA Journal
501,Kakad Chambers,
132, Dr. A.Besant Road
WORLI, MUMBAI-400018
Sir,
Sub: - Regarding the Declaration in respect of the Article ELECTRICAL INTERLOCK
DESIGNS FOR SUB-STATION OPERATION.
1. I confirm that this article is original and has not been earlier published in any
journal/magazine or any other publication in India. The article has also not been
presented in any seminar/ conference held in India.
2. I confirm that this article has not been sent by me to any other
journal/magazine/publication for publishing the same.
3. I am aware, that IEEMA pays honorarium to every published article. On payment of such
honorarium, the copyright of the article rests with IEEMA Journal. Therefore, the same
cannot be published elsewhere without express permission from IEEMA Journal.
4. I confirm that I am responsible for Correctness of data/experimental results presented,
Opinions expressed in the article, and Infringement, if any, of copyrights/ ownership
rights.
5. I am aware, that IEEMA journal publishes articles on good faith basis. Hence I will be
solely responsible for contents, violation of any law in the contents or actions arising
from contents or illustrations.
Thanking You.
Yours faithfully
P. K.PATTANAIK.
16