Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Electrochemistry Communications
j o u r n a l h o m e p a g e : w w w. e l s ev i e r. c o m / l o c a t e / e l e c o m
Delft University of Technology, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Mekelweg 2, 2628CD Delft, The Netherlands
Delft University of Technology, Novel Aerospace Materials, Kluyverweg 1, 2629HS Delft, The Netherlands
CSIRO Materials Science & Technology, Private Bag 33, Clayton South MDC, VIC 3169, Australia
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 10 June 2011
Received in revised form 5 July 2011
Accepted 12 July 2011
Available online 23 July 2011
Keywords:
Self-healing coating
Silyl-ester
Encapsulation
Corrosion
Scanning electrochemical microscopy
a b s t r a c t
In this paper, the long-term anticorrosive efciency of a damaged self-healing coating is studied for the rst
time using scanning electrochemical microscopy (SECM). In the study an epoxy-coating with embeddedcapsules containing a silyl-ester is employed. The properties of the silyl-ester as a healing-agent for the
protection of AA2024-T3 were evaluated by complementary SECM experiments operating in negativefeedback and redox-competition modes. The experimental approach here presented allowed for monitoring
the early-stages of corrosion activity and subsequent healing mechanisms offered by the release of silyl-ester
into a relatively large coating defect. This result was observed by detecting the transition of the oxygen
reduction response from a redox-competition mode to a negative-feedback behavior. These measurements
demonstrated that the silyl-ester is released efciently after capsules break upon coating damage, covering
relatively large areas and gradually healing the damaged-site hindering the corrosion processes and providing
an effective protection for at least one month of immersion in chloride solution.
2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
Recently, increasing research efforts have been focused towards the
development of (anticorrosive) coatings based on self-healing concepts.
Self-healing materials are generally dened as materials exhibiting the
ability to repair themselves and to recover functionality using the
resources inherently available to them. In the eld of organic coatings,
several approaches have been successfully implemented so far [1], and a
critical overview of the actual and future perspectives within the eld can
be found elsewhere [2]. One of the most common self-healing approaches
is based on embedding discrete capsules lled with healing-agents in the
coating matrix [3]. Within this concept, the most common approach uses
two-healing agents (i.e. resin and cross-linker or catalyst) [39] with an
efficiency limited by the probability of having both species present at
the same time and in the required ratio at the damage site. More recently
an approach for organic coatings has been presented requiring a single
healing-agent that reacts with the environment upon fracture of the
containers [10,11]. In a previous paper, the authors presented a new
approach encompassing an encapsulated one-component healing-agent
based on a silyl-ester derivate [10]. In the case when the coating is
damaged, the capsules at the defect faces are ruptured and release the
silyl-ester. Once released, the agent wets both metal and polymer
surfaces within the defect, and reacts with ambient moisture and metallic
substrate, creating a protective hydrophobic barrier layer [10].
1095
Fig. 1. (a) Optical micrograph of AA2024-T3 sample with bare and silyl-treated surface after 1 day immersion in 0.05 M NaCl solution. (b) SECM image of the transition area on (a)
using the electroreduction of oxygen in solution as reaction at the tip. Scan rate: 40 ms 1.Scanned area: 1.25 1 mm2. (c) Approaching-curves performed on the bare metal (black
line) and on the silyl-covered area (red line). Currents corresponding to oxygen-reduction at the tip are plotted versus normalized sample-tip distance (L = distance/tip-radius).
(d) Overlapped approaching-curves corresponding to measurements using electrochemical mediator (red-dashed line) and oxygen reduction (black-solid line). On top curves
performed on bare sample, and on the bottom, curves on the silylester-treated surface.
1096
Fig. 2. Sequence of SECM line scans across the defect by using ferrocenemethanol as mediator which reects the topography (black solid line), and by electroreduction of oxygen at
the tip (red solid line) which reects the level of oxygen consumption in solution. Defective capsules-containing coating on AA2024-T3 metal after (a) 1, (b) 3, (c) 15 and (d) 30 days
of immersion in 0.05 M NaCl solution. Defect-size: ~ 240 m 1.9 mm. Coating-thickness: 240 20 m. Line scan-rate: 20ms 1. Damaged clear epoxy-coating on AA2024-T3 after
(e) 1 and (f) 3 days of immersion in chloride solution. Defect-size: ~ 200 m 1.5 mm. Coating-thickness:207 19 m. Line scan-rate: 20ms 1.
1097
While the healing agent was unable to cover or fully densify and
protect the damage completely as from a short exposure time, after
the silyl-ester formed a fully isolating layer, the coating defect
remained protected during the one-month experiment. These results
clearly demonstrate the long-term efciency of the encapsulated silylester incorporated in an organic coating for the corrosion protection
of aluminum alloys.
SECM measurements monitoring the changes of oxygen concentration in the proximity of an AA2024-T3 surface during immersion in
aggressive solution demonstrated that silyl-ester formed an isolating
and homogenous layer able to protect the surface against corrosion
effectively. Approach-curves established the different kinetics of the
oxygen-reduction in the absence and presence of the silyl-ester
healing-agent. In the presence of a protective layer of the silyl-ester,
oxygen behaved as a conventional electrochemical mediator. On bare
metal, oxygen redox-competition between corrosion processes at the
metal and at the tip was established indicating that the solution near
the metal surface had a depletion of available oxygen up to 60% with
respect to bulk concentration.
Acknowledgements
The authors gratefully acknowledge the nancial support from the
Innovative Research Program (IOP) in The Netherlands for this research
under project numbers IOP-SHM0633 and IOP-SHM08740C. S.J. Garca
also acknowledges the nancial support of The Netherlands Organization for Scientic Research (NWO-STW) for the Veni grant under
number 10690.
References
[1] A.E. Hughes, I.S. Cole, T.H. Muster, R.J. Varley, Nat Asia Mater 2 (2010) 143151.
[2] S.J. Garca, H.R. Fischer, S. van der Zwaag, accepted with revisions by Prog. Org.
Coat. (2011).
[3] S.R. White, N.R. Sottos, P.H. Geubelle, J.S. Moore, M.R. Kessler, S.R. Sriram, E.N.
Brown, S. Viswanathan, Nature 409 (2001) 794.
[4] S.K. Ghosh, Functional Coatings, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, Germany, 2007.
[5] S.D. Mookhoek, B.J. Blaiszik, H.R. Fischer, N.R. Sottos, S.R. White, S. van der Zwaag,
J. Mater. Chem. 18 (2008) 5390.
[6] S.H. Cho, H.M. Andersson, S.R. White, N.R. Sottos, P.V. Braun, Adv. Mater. 18
(2006) 997.
[7] A. Kumar, L.D. Stephenson, J.N. Murray, Prog. Org. Coat. 55 (2006) 244.
[8] T. Nesterova, K. Dam-Johansen, S. Kiil, Prog. Org. Coat. 70 (2011) 342.
[9] S.H. Cho, S.R. White, P.V. Braun, Adv. Mater. 21 (2009) 645.
[10] S.J. Garca, H.R. Fischer, P.A. White, J. Mardel, Y. Gonzlez-Garca, J.M.C. Mol, A.E.
Hughes, Prog. Org. Coat. 70 (2011) 142.
[11] M. Samadzadeh, S. Hatami Boura, M. Peikari, A. Ashra, S.M. Kasiriha, Prog. Org.
Coat. 70 (2011) 383.
[12] Y. Gonzlez-Garca, J.M.C. Mol, T. Muselle, I. De Graeve, G. Van Assche, G.
Scheltjens, B. Van Mele, H. Terryn, Electrochem. Commun. 13 (2011) 169.
[13] M.A. Jakab, D.A. Little, J.R. Scully, J. Electrochem. Soc. 152 (2005) B311.
[14] A.C. Bastos, A.M. Simes, S. Gonzlez, Y. Gonzlez-Garca, R.M. Souto, Electrochem.
Commun. 6 (2004) 1212.
[15] Simes Alda, Battocchi Dante, Tallman Dennis, Bierwagen Gordon, Prog. Org. Coat.
63 (2008) 260.
[16] S. Gonzlez, L. Fernndez-Mrida, R.M. Souto, Electroanalysis 21 (2009) 2640.
[17] J.J. Santana, J. Gonzlez-Guzmn, L. Fernndez-Mrida, S. Gonzlez, R.M. Souto,
Electrochim. Acta. 55 (2010) 4488.
[18] S. Gonzlez, J.J. Santana, Y. Gonzlez-Garca, L. Fernndez-Mrida, R.M. Souto,
Corros. Sci. 53 (2011) 1910.
[19] A.J. Bard, F.-R. Fan, M.V. Mirkin, Physical Electrochemistry: Principles, Methods
and Applications, in: I. Rubinstein (Ed.), Marcel Dekker, New York, 1995, p. 209.
[20] R. David, Lide, Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 84th ed. CRC Press, Boca Raton,
Florida, 2003.
[21] M.L. Hitchman, Measurement of Dissolved Oxygen, Wiley, New York, 1978, p. 2.