You are on page 1of 3

eCourt, Lawyers with Disabilities, and the ADA | Oregon Law Practice Management

Page 1 of 4

Oregon Law Practice


Management
Practice Management Tips for Oregon Lawyers

eCourt, Lawyers with Disabilities,


and the ADA
Posted on 02/23/2015
In October of 2014, the PLF added At the Corner of Law Practice and Disability
to its collection of CLEs available on the PLF website.
This program discusses EEOC and ADA requirements; work at home/telework as
a reasonable accommodation; practical ways a small firm can accommodate an
attorney with disabilities; ethical concerns and best practices for lawyers who
have an unplanned medical emergency; resources for attorneys with disabilities;
and social security disability. Speakers included Amber Bevacqua-Lynott, Cheryl
Caon, Melissa Kenney, Kendra Matthews, Lisa Porter, Helle Rode, and Camilla
Thurmond with special content provided by Alice Plymell.
Kudos to Oregon Women Lawyers for sponsoring this CLE. It raised awareness,
offered concrete resources, and generated some interesting questions. Here
is one that occurred to me:

What happens at the Corner of Disability and Mandatory eCourt?


Consider this scenario: Lawyer A is visually impaired. Using an interactive
website, such as Oregons Odyssey eFile & Serve eCourt System, is difficult if not
impossible. What can (or should) Lawyer A do?

http://oregonlawpracticemanagement.com/2015/02/23/ecourt-lawyers-with-disabilities-and-t... 6/5/2015

eCourt, Lawyers with Disabilities, and the ADA | Oregon Law Practice Management

Page 2 of 4

First Order Issues


It does not appear that the eFile & Serve website can be used by impaired users.
Searching Self-Service Support on the Odyssey eFile & Serve website
produces this less-than-clear result:
Article #4263 Does your website work with accessibility programs for
impaired users? KB4263. In general, an information technology system is
accessible to people with disabilities if it can be used in a variety of ways
that do not depend on a single sense or ability. For example, a system that
provides output only in audio format would not be accessible to people with
hearing impairments, and a system that requires mouse actions to navigate
would not be accessible to people who cannot use a mouse because of a
dexterity or visual impairment. Section 508 focuses on the overall
accessibility of electronic and information systems, not on providing
accommodations at individual worksites. Individuals with disabilities may still
need specific accessibility-related software or peripheral devices to be able
to use an accessible system.
Can other technology, like a screen reader, come to the rescue? Not really.
Screen readers are software programs that allow blind or visually impaired users
to read the text that is displayed on the computer screen with a speech
synthesizer or braille display. They can be free, but may also cost upwards of
$1200.
Screen readers are a help to users who have difficulty seeing content on a Web
page, but they are not usually a good solution for interactive sites with fill-in
fields and pick-lists.

What is the Answer?


If the eFile & Serve website cannot be used by impaired users, Lawyer A has
three options:
1. Try to use GoToAssist, the support program used by Tyler Technologies to
remote in and take control of the users computer. [Follow the link. See
Article 2517.]
2. Request a waiver of the eFiling requirement.
3. Delegate eFiling to someone else.

http://oregonlawpracticemanagement.com/2015/02/23/ecourt-lawyers-with-disabilities-and-t... 6/5/2015

eCourt, Lawyers with Disabilities, and the ADA | Oregon Law Practice Management

Page 3 of 4

In the interest of full disclosure, I have real doubts about the viability of the first
solution:
Lawyer As visual impairment may interfere with her ability to invoke
GoToAssist, which is a mouse-based selection on the main login page.
GoToAssist is intended for use in resolving discrete technical issues. It is
not a repetitive, day-to-day filing solution.

What about the ADA?


Good question. I dont know the answer.
Since eCourt is mandatory, it feels right to conclude that the lawyer is entitled to
an ADA accommodation. The most logical resolution: a waiver of the eFiling
requirement.
Follow the links to my posts on eFiling waivers and delegating eFiling for a
complete discussion of those topics. Your thoughts?
[All Rights Reserved 2015 Beverly Michaelis]

SHARE THIS:

Twitter

Facebook

Tumblr

Press This

Reblog

Like

LinkedIn
Email

Pinterest

Google

Print

Be the first to like this.

RE LA TED

Avoiding eCourt Waivers and eFiling


"Lawyer Buddies"

eCourt Mandatory in
Oregon Effective
December 1

Are Private Lawyers


Required to Bear the
Cost of Communication
Access?

http://oregonlawpracticemanagement.com/2015/02/23/ecourt-lawyers-with-disabilities-and-t... 6/5/2015

You might also like