Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Assistant Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, Sinhgad Academy of Engineering, Pune, 411048, India.
Associate Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, Visvesvaraya National Institute of Technology, Nagpur, 440010, India.
3
Assistant Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, Sinhgad Academy of Engineering, Pune, 411048, India.
Abstract The assessment of environmental quality is emerging as a new concept of assessment in construction industry
with advent of ISO 14000. Developed countries are now evaluating their entire new construction project through LCA
model as suggested in ISO 14000. Augmentation and remediation of existing infrastructure project are also recently being
evaluated through LCA model. Evaluation of environmental quality in construction has attempted in recent past. While, in
India, very few infrastructural projects have done the evaluation. But, the concept and methodology adopted is from aboard
without considering the local requirement. Importance of critical evaluation of existing and new infrastructural project from
environmental aspect is deeply felt among leading construction professionals in India. Therefore development of LCA
model to evaluate environmental quality of existing or new infrastructure is considered to be a need of an hour.
An attempt is therefore made in this study to develop a LCA model suitable for evaluation of environmental quality of
any institutional building in India. As LCA is consider a complex scientific method, this study was conducted with the
purpose of clarifying LCA by explaining the basic underlying fundamentals and identifying occasions for use of LCA in
design practice. Thus the study aims to provide a primer on LCA to clear the existing confusion; Identify the opportunities for use of LCA at present in the building industry; developing LCA based model for Indian condition; propose guidelines for integrating LCA in building design; Identify future prospects and recommend future research opportunities.
1. Introduction
The building sector is a vital part in the progress towards environmental sustainability, because of its high potential to
decrease the environmental impact. However, the building industry remains one of the most critical industries for the adoption of environmental sustainability principles, because of several unique characteristics in terms of e.g. long-lived product
involved. Environmental assessment methodology such as Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) have an important role to play in
implementing environmental sustainability in the building sector, as they provide a clear declaration of what are considered
the key environmental considerations and also provide a way of communicating these issues. LCA is the broadest indicator
and an internationally standardized method (ISO 14040 and ISO 14044) .LCA method is used to evaluate the life cycle
carbon footprint of a different product such as building. A Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is a crucial first step in taking
carbon out of the systems because it provides a baseline measurement and helps identify areas for improvement.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
2015 ,IRJIE-All Rights Reserved
Page -59
ISSN: 2395-0560
3. Methodology
Model developed in the present study for the life cycle assessment of institutional building is based on determination of the
total environmental impact caused by the building. A carbon footprint is estimated to determine the total environmental
impact to assess the life cycle perspective for environmental appraisal of the building. The end of the life in building is
considered up to the last retro fraction which is usually taken as 50 years in the Indian condition. The estimation of carbon
footprint is done by considering the energy and resource consumption during the life span of building. The Building LCA
Model for assessment of institutional building is divided into two major components. The first module covers the calculation
of carbon footprint of material used for the construction; second module covers the calculation of carbon footprint of electricity consumption for building facility. The measurement of total carbon emission is only considered as a measure for
evaluating the total environmental impact of building. Since this is one of the major component leading to several adverse
environmental impact. The carbon footprint estimation is then compared with the carbon footprint of other similar buildings
to assess its relative impact on the environment. This generic model can applied for all types of building usually found in
educational institutional campus, because every building can be assess by this two common modules.
i) Volume of CO2 discharged in a life cycle of building materials =
Total CO2 Emitted
(MT) =
(total quantity of
Construction Material)
(Unit Weight
of material)
(1)
(Embodied Tone of CO2 Per
Tone of Material)
Thus, the summation of environmental impact of building materials gives the total environmental impact.
Total emission (TE) = TE 1 + TE 2 + TE 3 + .TE n
ii) Volume of CO2discharge from operation of building facility=
Emission kg of CO2 =
(electricity
consumption in Kwh)
(2)
(Emission factor Kg
CO2 eq./kwh)
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
2015 ,IRJIE-All Rights Reserved
Page -61
ISSN: 2395-0560
4. Execution of Model
A soft tool is developed as BUILDING CO2.xls to estimate the total environmental impact of the institutional building.
The output data is obtained in the form of carbon emission expressed as kg CO2 eq. or Tone CO2 eq. For the Application of
model, soft tool developed for the carbon footprint calculation is now applied to the institutional building .The result is then
compared with the other buildings whose carbon footprint has already calculated elsewhere.
Table 1. Building Description
Name of the site
Year of construction
2010
Building Area
5475 m2
Building Type
Number of floors
G+2 floors
Construction Material
concrete
2964.22
Steel
1853.84
Brick masonry
796.18
Plaster
310.61
No.
tone
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
2015 ,IRJIE-All Rights Reserved
Page -62
ISSN: 2395-0560
P O P Putty
214.02
Timber
88.62
430.39
ventilators
8
paint
6754.41
granite
15.39
10
marble flooring
1.32
11
Ceramic Tiles
6.81
12
limestone
20.08
13
G.I. pipes
4.25
14
C.C. Pipes
0.45
15
RCC pipes
10.10
16
C.I pipes
100.95
17
PVC pipes
13.01
total=
month
CO2 emission in kg
January
6056.07
February
7102.68
March
8285.88
April
8847.03
May
8989.71
June
6587.64
July
6009.96
Aug
Sept
9504.75
10
Oct
9038.43
11
Nov
7381.08
12
Dec
5892.51
no.
9220.26
5. Benchmarking
Construction sector is important sector from the material consumption point of view. Significant CO2 emission can be
contributed to the production of these materials. In the construction of building in Western Europe, the carbon emission range
from the 275 Mt CO2 per year to 415 Mt CO2 per year. The material used for the construction of building, in which steel emits
42.5 Mt CO2 per year, bricks emits 13.3 Mt CO2 per year, timber emits 17.5 Mt CO2 per year and PVC emits 1.1 Mt CO2 per
year in European environmental condition [2]. In the present study carbon emission from the building material is calculated to
be 271.7 Mt CO2 per year ,in which the steel contributes 37.06 Mt CO2 per year, bricks contributes 15.92 Mt CO2 per year,
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
2015 ,IRJIE-All Rights Reserved
Page -63
ISSN: 2395-0560
Concrete
Steel
Masonry
7. Conclusion
The focus is on the carbon footprint and the results indicate that the building construction material has the largest contribution to this impact which is 76 %, while building facility contributes 23 % carbon impact. The results also highlight the
opportunities for reducing the carbon dioxide impacts on the building Carbon foot printing can help to identify key construction materials with high-embodied carbon and promote low-carbon alternatives. It has been seen that the materials with
the greatest carbon footprint on the project were steel, glass and concrete, which were responsible for over half the buildings
embodied carbon they make up almost 90 percent of the building embodied carbon. In order to reduce the carbon footprint of
these construction materials, the use of fly ash concrete, this could have reduced total embodied carbon by around 8 percent
by replacing half the Portland cement with fly ash. All metal, with the exception of steel tubing, was manufactured from local
scrap steel, which has lower embodied carbon content than newly cast steel. For example, the carbon emissions from the
manufacture of steel screens were reduced by 9 percent, compared with an average steel supplier, by increasing the recycled
content from 54 percent to 99 percent. A buildings carbon footprint can be reduced by sourcing its operational energy from
environmentally responsible sources, or by generating renewable energy on site enhances the efficiency through the use of
machineries so as to reduce energy consumption. Also the clean producing and reduce the loss of materials in the construction
processes. In the designing process, appropriate energy-saving measures should be taken into consideration, such as temperature insulation, shading, natural ventilation technology can be used in outer protective structure, improve residents
awareness of energy conservation, in order to reduce energy consumption as well carbon emissions during operational phase
of the building.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
2015 ,IRJIE-All Rights Reserved
Page -64
ISSN: 2395-0560
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The Authors thankfully acknowledge to Dr. Mrs. M. V. Latkar Asstt. Prof., Incharge of Environmental Chemistry Laboratory, Department of Civil Engineering, VNIT, Nagpur for their support, comments and valuable suggestions.
REFERENCES
[1]
[2]
[3]
Jukka Heinonen , Antti Synjoki and Seppo Junnila (2011), A Longitudinal Study on the Carbon Emissions of a New Residential
Development.
D.J.Gielen (1997), building material and CO2 western European emission reduction strategy.
Nathaniel Aden, Yining Qin, David Fridley. (2010), Lifecycle Assessment of Beijing-Area Building Energy Use and Emissions:
Summary Findings and Policy Applications.
[4]
Adalberth, K. (1997), Energy use during the life cycle of single-unit dwellings: 10 Examples, Building and Environment, Vol 32,
[5]
[6]
p. 321-329.
Cole, R J and Kernan, P C (1996), Life-cycle energy use in office buildings, Building and Environment, Vol 31, pp 307-317.
Scheuer, C, Keoleian, G A and Reppe, P (2003), Life cycle energy and 25 environmental performance of a new university building:
Modeling challenges and 26 design implications, Energy and Buildings, vol 35, pp 1049-1064.
[7]
Lukman, R, Tiwary, A and Azapagic, A (2009), Towards greening a university 7 campus: The case of the University of Maribor,
Press, UK.
[11] British Standards Institution, (2008b). PAS 2050:2008 Specification for the assessment of the life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of
goods and services. BSI: London.
[12] Finnveden G. (1999), A critical review of operational valuation/weighting methods for life cycle assessment. AFR-REPORT 253,
Stockholm: Swedish Environmental Protection Agency.
[13] Guine
et
al,
(2002),
Handbook
on
Life
Cycle
Assessment:
Operational
Guide
to
the
ISO
Stand-
ards.http://www.leidenuniv.nl/cml/ssp/projects/lca2/lca2.html
[14] Hammond, G.P., and Jones, C.I., (2008a), Embodied energy and carbon in construction materials. Proceedings of the Institution of
Civil Engineers: Energy 161 (Pages 87-98).
[15] Ibid ISO (2006),Environmental management Life cycle assessment Requirements 25 and guidelines, ISO 14044:2006. International Organization for Standardization, 26 Geneva, Switzerland, 2006.
[16] International Organization for Standardization, 2006. ISO 14040:2006 Environmental management - Life cycle assessment.
[17] John Perez-Garcia, Bruce Lippke, David Briggs, James B. Wilson, James Bowyer, Jaime Meil, (2006), The Environmental Performance of Renewable Building Materials in the Context of Residential Construction.
[18] Wenfa Hu , Ming Fu (2008), Assessment of Carbon Dioxide Emissions Based on Construction Project Life Cycle.
[19] Yang JX, Xu C, Wang RS. (2002), Methodology and application of life cycle assessment. Beijing: China Meteorological Press.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
2015 ,IRJIE-All Rights Reserved
Page -65