You are on page 1of 2

Virgin Mobile USA LLC v. Van Loc Dealer et al Doc.

8
Case 2:06-cv-01039-RSL Document 8 Filed 07/26/2006 Page 1 of 2

6
7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
8 AT SEATTLE
9 VIRGIN MOBILE USA, LLC,
10 Plaintiff,
11 Case No. C06-1039RSL
v.
12
ORDER STRIKING
VAN LOC DEALER, et al., DISCOVERY MOTION
13
Defendants.
14

15

16
This matter comes before the Court on plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Conduct Expedited

17
Discovery (Dkt. #6). Plaintiff moves the Court for an order allowing it to obtain expedited

18
discovery to support its planned motion for injunctive relief.

19
Plaintiff argues that it has an immediate need for relief. Although there are mechanisms

20
to obtain immediate injunction relief, plaintiff has not sought that relief in this motion. Instead,

21
it has sought expedited discovery, which the Court is reluctant to grant on an ex parte basis.

22
Plaintiff has not filed proof that it has served its complaint or its motion for discovery on the

23
defendants. Accordingly, the motion is STRICKEN.

24
Plaintiff may refile its motion, but, under the circumstances, defendants must be allotted

25
additional time to respond. Plaintiff seeks extensive discovery from defendants including

26
requests for production, requests for inspection, and a 30(b)(6) video deposition in a very short

27
time frame. For those reasons, in addition to the fact that the complaint was just filed on July

28 ORDER STRIKING MOTION - 1

Dockets.Justia.com
Case 2:06-cv-01039-RSL Document 8 Filed 07/26/2006 Page 2 of 2

1 24, 2006, and the apparent absence of pre-filing discussions between the parties, defendants
2 should have the benefit of the twenty-day answer period to review the filings and attempt to
3 obtain counsel prior to responding to the discovery motion. After plaintiff serves the complaint
4 and the motion, it may file a notice to renote the motion1 for a date that is no earlier than seven
5 judicial days after service of the motion and no earlier than twenty days after service of the
6 complaint.
7

8 DATED this 26th day of July, 2006.


9

10

11 A
Robert S. Lasnik
12 United States District Judge
13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25 1
Plaintiff need not refile the motion papers. Instead, it can file a notice to renote the
26 motion and state in the notice that it seeks to renote its motion for leave to conduct expedited
discovery (Dkt. #6). The notice should include proofs of service if they were not previously
27 filed.
28 ORDER STRIKING MOTION - 2

You might also like