Professional Documents
Culture Documents
>
To join an online discussion about this article
with the author and other readers, go to the
ProcessCity Discussion Room for CEP articles
at www.processcity.com/cep.
ChEs
Guide
CHEs
to
Vishwas V. Wadekar,
HTFS, AEA Technology
Hyprotech
2000
American Institute
of Chemical Engineers.
All rights reserved.
Copying and
downloading permitted
with restrictions.
(1)
CEP
December 2000
www.aiche.org/cep/
39
Figure 2.
T2,
Thermal effectiveness
vs. number of transfer
units.
in
out
T1,
T2,
out
1.0
Countercurrent
Thermal Effectiveness
T1,
in
0.8
0.6
Crossflow
0.4
Cocurrent
0.2
40
www.aiche.org/cep/
December 2000
0
0
NTUmax = UA/Cmin
Thermal effectiveness
and temperature approach
These two terms are often used
in connection with heat exchangers.
Because they characterize the thermal performance of an exchanger,
they are especially relevant and frequently used in quantifying the
thermal benefits of compact heat
exchangers.
Thermal effectiveness is a ratio of
the actual heat transferred in the exchanger to the thermodynamic maximum. If a two-stream heat exchanger
is handling streams with equal thermal capacity, mcp (flow rate times
heat capacity) [i.e., (mcp)Stream 1 =
(mcp)Stream 2], then the thermal effectiveness, , is simply given by the
ratio of the actual temperature change
for a stream to the maximum possible
temperature change. For the example
depicted in Figure 1, the temperature
change for Stream 1 is (T1,out T1,in).
If the heat exchanger had an infinite
area, the outlet temperature of Stream
1 would be equal to the inlet temperature of Stream 2. The maximum possible temperature change for Stream
1 is, therefore, (T1,in T2,in). Thus, the
thermal effectiveness will be given by
=
T1,out T1,in
T1,in T2,in
(2)
The temperature approach is the
minimum difference between the
CEP
local stream temperatures in the exchanger. For the unit shown in Figure
1, it remains the same everywhere
throughout the exchanger because the
two stream temperature profiles are
parallel to each other.
Exchangers that contain more
heat-transfer area, provide high overall heat-transfer coefficients, and
have pure countercurrent flow tend to
have a higher thermal effectiveness.
This is illustrated in Figure 2, which
plots thermal effectiveness against
the maximum number of transfer
units (NTUmax).
Cmin is the minimum of
(mcp)Stream 1 and (mcp)Stream 2. Note
that for a given position along the
x-axis, the countercurrent flow arrangement provides the maximum
thermal effectiveness, followed by
crossflow, and then cocurrent flow.
The curves approach different limiting values of thermal effectiveness
asymptotically 0.5 and 1.0 for
cocurrent and countercurrent flow,
respectively, with an intermediate
value for crossflow.
For any given flow arrangement,
the thermal effectiveness rises with
an increase in the overall heat-transfer coefficient and heat-transfer area,
although the rate of increase slows
down asymptotically. It should be
noted that exchangers with higher
thermal effectiveness result in closer
temperature approaches.
Hydraulic Diameter, mm
60
10
0.1
Human Lungs
Specialty
Plate-Fin
Plate
Shell-and-Tube
100
1,000
10,000
Figure 3. Flow channel size and heat-transfer area density for various types of heat exchangers.
As mentioned earlier, compact
heat exchangers offer high overall
heat-transfer coefficients and heattransfer areas. Hence, they can operate at a high thermal effectiveness,
making them especially suitable for
close temperature approach duties.
Again, many CHEs can be configured as nearly ideal countercurrent
flow devices. Thus, they fall on or
very near the high thermal effectiveness curve for countercurrent flow in
Figure 2.
The flow passages of compact
heat exchangers offer another advantage. The flow velocities of the
streams tend to be more uniform
across the flow width thereby minimizing the stagnant or low-velocity
zones within the exchanger. Because
such zones are more susceptible to
fouling, their elimination means that
CHEs have less propensity to foul.
Although compact exchangers are
less likely to foul on this basis, the
possibility of blockage of the small
flow channels by suspended particles
needs to be taken into account for
not-so-clean fluids. In many cases,
this calls for the installation of
strainers before the streams enter the
exchanger.
Degree of compactness
Heat exchangers can be classified in
a variety of ways. One way that is especially relevant to compact heat exchangers is based on two closely related parameters the flow channel size and
the heat-transfer area density. Normally,
the smaller the flow channel size in the
exchanger, the higher the area density.
Figure 3 compares several broad
categories of heat exchangers. Shelland-tube exchangers use plain tubes
that are typically 10 to 30 mm in diameter, which translates to area densities of about 100 m2/m3. Plate-type
exchangers (e.g., plate-and-frame exchangers) generally have 5-mm to 8mm channels and area densities more
than 200 m2/m3. Plate-fin exchangers, the category to which car radiators belong, have channel sizes of
about 2 mm and area densities between 800 and 1,500 m2/m3. Speciality heat exchangers, which include
the printed circuit heat exchanger,
have channels with hydraulic diameters of roughly 1 to 2 mm and area
densities of over 2,000 m2/m3. The
human lung, with flow passages of
0.2 mm equivalent diameter and area
densities of more than 10,000 m2/m3,
is shown for comparison.
CEP
Gasketted plate-and-frame
heat exchanger
This exchanger, referred to as a
plate-and-frame heat exchanger or
simply a plate heat exchanger, consists of a pack of plates held together
in a frame. Figure 4 shows an exploded view of the assembly of a plate
heat exchanger. More details of construction are available from a number
of sources (e.g., Ref. 1).
As shown in Figure 4, the two
streams flow in alternate channels between plates, entering and leaving via
ports in the corners of the plates.
Each plate has a gasket around the
edge and around the ports. The gaskets around the plate edge define the
flow paths and are arranged to make
the two streams flow in alternate plate
passages.
The exchanger can be completely
dismantled for cleaning. This is the
main reason for its widespread use in
the food industry and other clean
applications.
Figure 5 shows a typical chevron
pattern, which forms the cross-corrugated passages in the plate heat exchanger with chevron patterns of the
consecutive plates pointing in opposite directions. The plates are normally made of stainless steel; they are
also available in other higher alloys
and metals (such as titanium) for special duties. Plates can be from 0.2 m
to over 3 m long, with widths typically 20% to 40% of their length. The
plate thickness is usually in the range
of 0.4 to 0.9 mm, and the plate spacing varies between 2.5 and 5 mm, except for special wide-gap plates
sometimes used for viscous or fibrous
materials. The hydraulic diameter for
flow between plates is approximately
twice the plate spacing.
December 2000
www.aiche.org/cep/
41
Soft Plate
Hard Plate
Figure 4. Exploded view of a plate-and-frame heat exchanger. Courtesy of Alfa Laval Thermal Inc.
Operating pressures up to 20 bar
are standard, and somewhat higher
pressures can be achieved using
heavy-duty frames. The gaskets, employed to seal the flow passages, usually limit the operating temperature
range, with a lower limit of 25C
and an upper limit of 160C to
180C, depending on the specific gasket material.
The main advantage of this type of
exchanger is that it can be opened,
providing complete accessibility to
the heat-transfer surface. This also
gives the flexibility of adding or removing some plates to accommodate
changes in the heat duty.
The main limitation of the plateand-frame heat exchanger is that the
process fluids must be compatible
with the gasket material. The gasketted construction also makes these
units unsuitable for refinery applications where prolonged resistance to
fire may be required. Partially welded
plate-and-frame exchangers (discussed later) allow the user to balance
the advantages of flexibility and accessibility arising from the gasketted
construction against the higher temperature and pressure operation with
a wider range of fluid types offered
by the welded construction. (Fully
welded exchangers can operate at
42
www.aiche.org/cep/
December 2000
CEP
Partially welded
plate heat exchanger
This variant of the plate-and-frame
heat exchanger attempts to combine
some of the advantages of gasketted
and welded construction. This design
is useful when a suitable gasket mate-
Endplate
Gasket
Service
Welded
Seal
Flowplate
Gasket
Welded
Seal
Flowplate Welded
Gasket
Seal
Flowplate
Gasket
Welded
Seal
Head
Process
Endplate
Pair
Flowplate
Pair
Flowplate
Pair
Sealplate
Pair
Figure 6. Partially welded, or welded-pair, plate heat exchanger. Courtesy of APV Heat Exchanger
Product Group.
Completely welded
plate heat exchanger
Recently, a fully welded platepack construction has been introduced in the market. In this arrangement, the plate pack is welded fully
CEP
Plate-and-shell
heat exchanger
An interesting variant of the plate
exchanger is the plate-and-shell heat
exchanger (Figure 8). It consists of a
stack of welded circular cross-corrugated plates fitted into a cylindrical
shell. The stack is formed by welding
the plates alternately around the ports
and around the outer periphery. One
stream flows through the plate pairs
and the other between the alternate
plate gaps.
The plates are made of stainless
steel and higher alloys. Plate diame-
December 2000
www.aiche.org/cep/
43
Figure 8.
Plate-and-shell heat exchanger.
44
www.aiche.org/cep/
December 2000
CEP
and two-phase duties involving boiling and condensation. In low-temperature cryogenic applications, they
provide the benefit of a multistream
capability, ensuring that all the cold
streams produced in a process are
used to cool the incoming warm
streams. They can operate at a thermal effectiveness up to 98% and are
able to handle temperature approaches down to less than 2C. In cryogenic duties where economics are
dominated by the cost of energy required to generate the low temperatures, such close temperature approach is of vital importance.
Brazed aluminum exchangers can
be used for streams at pressures up to
100 bar and generally within a temperature range of 269C to 100C;
with appropriate alloys for the headers and nozzles, they can be used at
temperatures up to 200C. However,
the maximum operating temperature
for aluminum alloys decreases rapidly with increasing pressure.
Four basic fin geometries (Figure
10) are used in plate-fin exchangers.
All manufacturers make plain, perforated, and serrated (offset strip) fins.
Some make wavy fins; others prefer
serrated fins with a long serration
length.
The perforations provide a small
enhancement over plain fins for improved single-phase performance.
Perforated fins are often used for
boiling. The perforations help to
equalize flows among the subchannels, mitigating against local blockage or pressure fluctuations arising
from the evaporation process.
Serrated fins significantly increase
Figure 9.
Inlet
Brazed aluminum
plate-fin heat
exchanger.
Nozzle
Header
Outlet
Distributor
Fin
Wear
Plate
Heat
Transfer Fin
Spacer
Bar
Parting Sheet
Stainless steel
plate-fin heat exchanger
Plate-fin heat exchangers can be
manufactured of materials other than
aluminum so that they can be operated at higher temperatures and pressures. Stainless steel exchangers have
been used for some time in vehicle
and aerospace applications, mainly
for single-phase duties. These are
typically small exchangers blocks
with sides less than 0.3 m. Some
manufacturers, however, can supply
larger brazed stainless-steel plate-fin
units (up to 0.6 m by 0.6 m by 1.5 m
long) for CPI applications.
Brazed stainless steel exchangers
are geometrically similar to brazed
aluminum plate-fin exchangers, but
they normally have lower fin heights
(less than 5 mm high) because of the
relatively poor thermal conductivity
of stainless steel. They generally employ plain fins, because other fin
types are difficult to manufacture in
stainless steel. Copper is used as the
braze metal for stainless steel exchangers.
The effect of the braze on process
fluids has sometimes been of concern
to potential users. Therefore, some
manufacturers are trying to develop
diffusion bonding techniques for
stainless steel plate-fin exchangers to
avoid problems associated with the
copper braze.
Support
Plate
Cap Sheet
Plain Fins
Perforated Fins
CEP
December 2000
www.aiche.org/cep/
45
Literature Cited
1. Hewitt, G. F., G. L. Shires, and T. R.
Bott, Process Heat Transfer, CRC
Press, London (1994).
2. Heavner, R. L., H. Kumar, and A. S.
Wanniarachchi, Performance of an Industrial Plate Heat Exchanger: Effect of
Chevron Angle, AIChE Symposium Series, Vol 89, AIChE, New York, pp.
262267 (1993).
3. Kumar, H., M. F. Edwards, P. R. Davison, D. O. Jackson, and P. J. Heggs,
The Importance of Corner Header Distributor Designs in Plate Heat Exchangers, Proceedings of the 10th International Heat Transfer Conference,
Brighton, U.K., published by IChemE,
Rugby, U.K., Industrial Session, Paper
1/2-CHE-5, pp. 8186 (1994).
4. Haseler, L. E., V. V. Wadekar, and R.
H. Clarke, Flow Distribution Effects in
a Plate Frame Heat Exchanger, 3rd
U.K. National Heat Transfer Conference,
published by IChemE, Rugby, U.K.,
IChemE Symposium Series 129, Vol. 1,
pp. 361367, (1992).
5. Adderley, C., and J. O. Fowler, The
Use of a Novel Manufacturing Process
for High Performance Titanium PlateFin Heat Exchanger, Chapter 17, Heat
Exchange Engineering, Vol. 2, E. A.
Foumeny and P. J. Heggs, eds., Ellis
Horwood, Chichester, U.K. (1991).
6. Haseler, L. E., and D. Butterworth,
Boiling in Compact Heat Exchangers/Industrial Practice and Problems, Keynote
Paper IV, International Conference on
Convective Flow Boiling, Banff, Canada,
published by Taylor & Francis, Philadelphia, PA, pp. 5770 (1995).
7. Guide to Compact Heat Exchangers,
Prepared for the Energy Efficiency Office by Energy Technology Support Unit
(ETSU), Harwell, U.K. (1994).
8. Oswald, J. I., D. A. Dawson, and L. A.
Clawley, A New Durable Gas Turbine
Recuperator, ASME Gas Turbine Conference, Indianapolis, IN, ASME 99-GT369, ASME, New York (1999).
9. Ramshaw, C., Intensified Heat Transfer: The Way Ahead?, Chapter 15,
Heat Exchange Engineering, Vol. 2, E.
A. Foumeny and P. J. Heggs, eds., Ellis
Horwood, Chichester, U.K. (1991).
10. Ferrato, M., and B. Thonon, A Compact
Ceramic Plate-Fin Heat Exchanger for Gas
Turbine Heat Recovery, in Compact Heat
Exchangers for the Process Industry, R. K.
Shah, ed., Begell House Inc., Wallingford,
U.K. and New York, pp. 195199 (1997).
46
www.aiche.org/cep/
December 2000
Diffusion-bonded titanium
plate-fin heat exchanger
Another development in the manufacture of plate-fin heat exchangers
capable of high-pressure, high-temperature operation is the application
of superplastic forming and diffusion
bonding technology (which was originally developed for titanium turbine
blades) (5). The manufacturing technique is illustrated in Figure 11.
Three sheets of titanium are diffusion bonded at selected positions
using a bond inhibitor. These three
sheets are then expanded superplastically in a closed die at elevated temperatures by pressurizing the unbonded regions between the plates. This
forms a single element equivalent to a
single layer of plate-fin geometry,
where the middle sheet forms the
subchannels (i.e., the secondary surface). The subchannels, however, are
trapezoidal rather than rectangular,
and somewhat larger than the subchannels in aluminum plate-fin exchangers. The heat exchanger core is
assembled by diffusion bonding these
elements together.
The typical height of the trapezoidal subchannels is 2 to 5 mm.
They are made as wavy rather than
straight subchannels. Different wavy
frequencies are offered to accommodate a range of pressure drop and
heat-transfer characteristics.
In terms of general heat transfer
and pressure drop performance, these
exchangers are similar to aluminum
plate-fin exchangers, offering the
same advantage of high thermal effectiveness. The use of titanium coupled with the metallurgical benefits of
the manufacturing technology allow
them to operate at temperatures
above 550C and at pressures above
200 bar. The other main advantage of
this type of exchanger is that titanium
which is a highly corrosion-resistant
material, and no other metal is involved as a braze.
All the existing applications of
these exchangers are for single-phase
duties (6).
CEP
Printed-circuit
heat exchanger
The printed-circuit heat exchanger is manufactured by diffusion
bonding technology. The term
printed circuit is used because
semicircular flow passages are
chemically etched onto flat plates,
which resemble printed circuit
boards (Figure 12). The plates are
then stacked and diffusion bonded
together to produce an exchanger capable of operating at pressures up to
1,000 bar and temperatures up to
900C. The exchangers can be manufactured of either stainless steel or
various higher alloys.
The flow passages in a printed-circuit heat exchanger are normally between 0.5 and 2.0 mm deep, and the
cross-section approximates a semicircle. Zigzag, as well as other morecomplicated patterns, can be etched.
Various combinations of crossflow
and counterflow can be employed in
the exchanger as required.
Welded compact
heat exchanger
Plate-and-frame exchangers with
After Bonding
After Ironing
fully welded plate packs were discussed earlier. There are also other
types of proprietary welded designs.
In one, large plates up to 10 m long
and 1.5 m wide are welded together
and the plate pack is contained within
Spiral recuperator
A new recuperator has been developed to withstand thermal cycling
(8). Unlike existing recuperators, it is
made from two continuous sheets of
metal wound into a spiral with a corrugated sheet providing finned channels for the hot gas stream (Figure
13). Air enters the top and flows
down, while the gas enters at the bottom and flows upward.
An unusual feature of the spiral recuperator is that the fins on the gas
side of the matrix are not physically
Figure 13.
Air In
Air Out
Construction of a
spiral recuperator.
Gas Out
Nonmetallic exchangers
Compact heat exchangers can also
be fabricated of nonmetallic materials
of construction, such as graphite,
polymer films, and ceramics, for specialized applications.
Graphite is used in making plates
for the conventional plate-and-frame
heat exchanger. With special gaskets
made from carbon fibers, these exchangers are used for highly corrosive fluids such as acid and salt solutions in the mineral processing industry. Graphite is also used as a
material of construction for carbon
block exchangers, where circular
passages are machined in a solid carbon block, typically in a crossflow
arrangement.
A detailed discussion of ceramic
and polymer film heat exchangers is
given by Ramshaw (9). More recently, Ferrato and Thonon (10) have investigated the use of ceramic plate-fin
heat exchangers for high-temperature
applications.
Selection
Choosing an appropriate compact
heat exchanger for a given duty is a
complex process. However, a preliminary selection procedure can be compared to a simple two-stage separation process that applies a coarse filter followed by a fine filter.
In this case, we are separating the
various types of CHEs into suitable
and unsuitable designs using technical criteria as the filters. The
coarse filter makes a preliminary
cut by rejecting the obviously unsuitable types and leaving behind those
that are capable of performing the
specified duty. The fine filter then
Gas In
CEP
December 2000
www.aiche.org/cep/
47
Partially
Welded
Plate-andFrame
Brazed
Plate-Fin
DiffusionBonded
Titanium
Plate-Fin
Brazed
Plate
Plate andShell
Printed
Circuit
Compactness (m2/m3)
Up to 200
Up to 200
Up to 200
8001,500
700800
>2,000
Stream Types
Liquid-Liquid
Gas-Liquid
Two-Phase
Liquid-Liquid
Gas-Liquid
Two-Phase
Liquid-Liquid
Two-phase
Liquids
Liquid-Liquid
Gas-Liquid
Two-Phase
Liquid-Liquid
Gas-Liquid
Two-Phase
Liquid-Liquid
Gas-Liquid
Two-Phase
Materials
Frame:
Carbon Steel
Plates:
Stainless Steel,
Titanium,
Incoloy,
Hastelloy,
Graphite
Frame:
Stainless
Carbon Steel
Steel
Plates:
Stainless Steel,
Incoloy,
Hastelloy,
Stainless
Steel,
Titanium
Aluminum,
Stainless
Steel,
Nickel Alloy
Titanium
S/S,
Nickel,
Titanium
Inconel
Incoloy
35 to +180
35 to +180
195 to +200
200 to +600
269 to +100
<550
200 to +900
25
25
30
40
90
200
300400
Cleaning Methods
Mechanical
Chem/Mech*
Chemical
Chem/Mech* Chemical
Chemical
Chemical
Multistream Capability
Not Common
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
*Chemical cleaning on the welded side and mechanical cleaning on the other side.
Source: Adapted from (7).
48
www.aiche.org/cep/
December 2000
CEP
(3)
Cold-Side Fluid
Parameter*
LowPressure
Gas
HighPressure
Gas
Process
Water
Hot-Side Fluid
LowHighViscosity
Viscosity
Organic
Organic Condensing
Liquid
Liquie
Steam
Condensing
Hydrocarbon
Condensing
Hydrocarbon
With
Inert Gas
Low-Pressure
Gas (1 bar)
U
C
55
2.13
93
1.88
102
1.71
99
1.76
63
2.24
107
1.62
100
1.74
86
1.82
High-Pressure
Gas (20 bar)
U
C
93
1.88
300
1.20
429
0.95
375
1.08
120
1.68
530
0.99
388
1.05
240
1.16
Treated
Cooling Water
105
484
938
720
142
1,607
764
345
1.65
1.08
0.81
1.07
1.41
0.48
1.01
1.17
Low-Viscosity
Organic Liquid
High-Viscosity
Organic Liquid
Boiling
Water
U
C
U
C
U
C
99
1.76
68
2.07
105
1.65
375
1.08
138
1.46
467
1.13
600
0.87
161
1.25
875
0.87
500
1.05
153
1.32
677
0.78
130
1.55
82
1.91
140
1.44
818
0.93
173
1.16
1,432
0.54
524
1.01
155
1.30
722
1.05
286
1.26
336
1.62
336
1.20
Boiling
Organic Liquid
U
C
99
1.76
375
1.08
600
0.87
500
1.05
130
1.55
818
0.93
524
1.01
286
1.26
changer. However, for some exchangers, especially those containing extended surfaces, it may be difficult to
define the heat-transfer area. For this
reason, Hewitt et al. (1) proposed
cost factors (C) based on Q/T.
Table 2 presents typical data for
the overall heat-transfer coefficient
and the cost factor at Q/T = 5,000
W/K for shell-and-tube exchangers
handling a variety of streams. (Complete tables for shell-and-tube and
plate-and-frame heat exchangers are
given in Ref. 1.) The steps involved
in the application of this fine filter
can be illustrated as follows.
1. Calculate the heat duty, Q, from
a heat balance.
2. Estimate the mean temperature difference, T, between the
streams, using a correction factor
(Ft) if necessary.
3. Calculate the ratio Q/T. Note
that the ratio may be different for dif-
ferent heat exchangers and flow configurations if the value of the correction factor is different.
4. Obtain values of C and U from
tables such as Table 2 (which is
adapted from Ref. 1) and using logarithmic interpolation if necessary.
Logarithmic interpolation should be
used to interpolate for in-between
values of Q/T.
5. Calculate the cost of the heat
exchanger by multiplying C and
Q/T.
6. Calculate the area of the heat
exchanger using Eq. 3.
If there is one heat exchanger or
heat exchanger flow configuration
that is significantly better (by a factor
of 1.5 or so), then this type warrants a
detailed design and cost estimation. If
there are several exchangers with
comparable costs, then all of them
need to be investigated in detail.
It should be noted that extensive
CEP
December 2000
www.aiche.org/cep/
49