Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Anthropology of Violence
SCAN10058
Wednesdays, 14.10 16.00, Lecture Room 5,
Chrystal Macmillan Building
Dr. Casey High
C.High@ed.ac.uk
Course Description
This course examines a variety of anthropological approaches to the study of violence, ranging
from evolutionary explanations for male aggression to studies of changing American attitudes
toward terrorism in the aftermath of the 9/11 attacks. It looks critically at the theoretical,
methodological and ethical questions raised in studies of violence through ethnographic case
studies from around the world. The course considers attempts to define violence as a concept
in the social sciences and explores the possible causes, meanings, and uses of violent
practices from a variety of different cultural contexts and perspectives. It gives particular
attention to the political and economic conditions that promote war and other violent behaviour
as well as specific cultural expressions within violent practices. It also discusses ethnographic
descriptions of peaceful societies and examines the challenges of reconciliation in the
aftermath of conflict.
Intended Learning Outcomes
By the end of this course students will be able to:
Understand how and why violence has become a major area of anthropological research
in recent decades.
Relate specific historical and ethnographic case studies of violence to current debates
in anthropology.
Draw on the course readings and class discussions to engage in key debates about
contemporary violence.
Recognise the ways in which the study of violence draws on multiple disciplinary
approaches from the natural and social sciences.
Demonstrate the ability to critically evaluate evidence from specific case studies, and
use such material in building coherent arguments in essay writing and seminar
presentations.
Course Delivery
The course will be taught over ten sessions, on Wednesdays, 14.10 16.00, Seminar Room
5, Chrystal Macmillan Building. Attendance of the entirety of these sessions is
compulsory. The first half of each session will consist of a lecture covering a specific theme
in the anthropology of violence in the first hour, while the second half of each session will
involve discussion and small group work. All students should do the essential reading
before each class.
Communications:
You are strongly encouraged to use email for routine communication with lecturers. We shall
also use email to communicate with you, e.g., to assign readings for the second hour of each
class. All students are provided with email addresses on the university system, if you are not
sure of your address, which is based on your matric number, check your EUCLID database
entry using the Student Portal.
This is the ONLY email address we shall use to communicate with you. Please note that
we will NOT use private email addresses such as yahoo or hotmail; it is therefore
essential that you check your university email regularly, preferably each day.
Assessment Information
All Single and Combined Honours, BA (Humanities and Social Science), and non-graduating
students will be assessed by:
1.
2.
Please refer to the Honours Handbook for more complete information about assessment
procedures.
The following are some of the criteria through which the essays will be marked. However, it is
important to note that the overall mark is a result of a holistic assessment of the assignment
as a whole.
A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
G.
2)
3)
To what extent should studies of violence reflect the political stance or personal
convictions of the researcher?
4)
5)
Why are colonial social categories so important for understanding violent conflicts in
the contemporary world?
In what ways have anthropologists and other social scientists attempted to define
violence as a concept?
2)
3)
4)
5)
What does it mean to say that some forms of violence are invisible?
6)
How does structural violence relate to specific forms of overt or intimate violence?
7)
Why are violent practices so often related to symbolic understandings of gender and/or
the body?
8)
In what ways are nation-states responsible for promoting and carrying out violence?
9)
10)
Date
18 September
25 September
2 October
9 October
16 October
23 October
30 October
6 November
13 November
20 November
Topic
What is Violence and how do we Study it?
Violence and Human Nature
Historical Perspective: Conflicts in Colonialism
Remembering Violence
The Violence of Everyday Life
Gender and Violence
The Body
Cosmology and the Poetics of Violence
Interventions of the State: The War on Terror
Peace and Reconciliation
Essential Readings:
UNESCO (1986) The Seville Statement on Violence.
De Waal, F. (1992) Aggression as a Well-integrated Part of Primate Social Relationships:
a critique of the Seville statement on violence. In J. Silverberg and P. Gray
(eds.) Aggression and Peacefulness in Humans and Other Primates. New York:
Oxford University Press (pgs. 37-56).
Sussman, R. (1999) The Myth of Man the Hunter/Man the Killer and the Evolution of
Human Morality. In The Biological Basis of Human Behaviour. R. Sussman, ed.
Pgs. 121-129. Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Further Readings:
Milgram, S. (1963) Behavioral Study of Obedience. Journal of Abnormal and Social
Psychology 67(4): Pgs. 371-378.
Otterbein. K. (2000) A History of Research on Warfare in Anthropology. American
Anthropologist 101(4): Pgs. 794-805.
Chagnon. N. (1988) Life Histories, Blood Revenge and Warfare in a Tribal Population.
Science 239: 985-92.
Daly, M. and M. Wilson (1982) Homicide and Kinship. American Anthropologist 84(2):
Pgs. 372-378.
Knauft, B. (1991) Violence and Sociality in Human Evolution. Current Anthropology
32(4): 391-428.
Wrangham, R. and D. Petersen (1996) Demonic Males: apes and the origins of human
violence. New York: Mariner Books.
Buss, D. (2006) The Murderer Next Door: why the mind is designed to kill. New York:
Penguin Press.
Buss, D. (2008) Evolutionary Psychology: the new science of the mind. Boston: Pearson,
WEEK 3: Historical Perspective: Conflicts in Colonialism
This week we examine how various forms of violence have emerged and changed through
colonial history and the new political and economic relations it brought to many parts of the
world. We will look at how historical approaches to violence have challenged assumptions
previously made about tribal warfare and genocide. In what ways did Europes colonial
expansion in Africa, Asia and the Americas create new spaces for violence? To what extent
have western imaginations of the other inflected contemporary violence conflicts in the
postcolonial world?
Essential Readings:
Taylor, C. (1999) The Hamitic Hypothesis in Rwanda and Burundi. In Sacrifice as
Terror: the Rwandan genocide of 1994. (Chapter 3: pgs 55-97).
Ferguson, R.B. (1999) A Savage Encounter: Western contact and the Yanomami war
complex. In R. Ferguson and N. Whitehead (eds.) War in the Tribal Zone:
expanding states and indigenous warfare. 199-228. Santa Fe: SAR Press.
(chapter 9)
Bourgois, P. (1995) In Search of Respect: selling crack in El Barrio. (Chapter 2: A
Street History of El Barrio Pgs. 48-76)
Further Readings:
High, C. (2009) Victims and Martyrs: converging histories of violence in Amazonian
anthropology and U.S. cinema. Anthropology and Humanism 34(1): 41-50.
Taussig, M. (2004) Culture of Terror Space of Death: Roger Casemants Putumayo
Report and the explanation of torture. In Violence in War and Peace. (chapter 2)
Conrad, J. (2004) From Heart of Darkness. In Violence in War and Peace. (chapter 1)
Gordon, R. (2004) The Bushman Myth: the making of a Namibian underclass. In
Violence in War and Peace. (chapter 6)
Further Readings:
High, C. (2010) Warriors, Hunters, and Bruce Lee: gendered agency and the
transformation of Amazonian masculinity. American Ethnologist 37(3): 753-770.
Harvey, P. (1994) Domestic Violence in the Peruvian Andes. In P. Harvey and P. Gow
(eds.) Sex and Violence. Pgs. 66-89. New York: Routledge.
Merry, S. (2009) Gender Violence: a cultural perspective. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Danner, M. (2004) From The Massacre at El Mozote: a parable of the Cold War. In
Violence in War and Peace. (chapter 41)
Bourdieu, P. (2004) Gender and Symbolic Violence. In Violence in War and Peace.
(chapter 42)
Coleman, L. (2007) The Gendered Violence of Development: imaginative geographies of
exclusion in the imposition of Neo-liberal capitalism. The British Journal of
Politics and International Relations Vol 9: 204-219.
Overing, J. (1989) Styles of Manhood: an Amazonian contrast in tranquillity and
violence. In S. Howell and R. Willis (eds.) Societies at Peace: anthropological
perspectives. 79-99. (chapter 4)
Dobash, R. and R. Dobash (1992) Violence, Women and Social Change. New York:
Routledge.
Archetti, E. (2007) Masculinity, Primitivism, and Power: Gaucho, Tango, and the
shaping of Argentine national identity. In W. French and K. Bliss (eds.) Gender,
Sexuality, and Power in Latin America since Independence. Pgs. 212-229.
Plymouth, UK: Rowman & Littlefield.
WEEK 7: The Body
Whether as a source of pain, nationalist sentiment or cultural identity, the body is central to
understanding the social meanings of violence. This week we will explore historically and
ethnographically how the practice of violence is often closely related to body symbolism and
embodied experience. We will examine cases in which bodies become expressions of
domination, control, contestation, ambiguity and terror. Why is the female body so often a site
of symbolic violence and nationalist imagination? In what ways does the treatment of bodies
reveal structural violence?
Essential Readings:
Foucault, M. (1995) The Body of the Condemned. In Discipline and Punish: the birth of
the prison. New York: Vantage. (chapter 1, part 1)
Das, V. (2004) Language and Body: transactions in the construction of pain. In A.
Kleinman, V. Das and M. Lock (eds.) Social Suffering. Pgs. 67-92. Berkeley:
University of California Press.
Further Readings:
Wacquant, L. (2004) Body and Soul: notebooks of an apprentice boxer. (The Street and
the Ring pgs. 13-150) Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ramphele, M. (1997) Political Widowhood in South Africa: the embodiment of
ambiguity. In A. Kleinman, V. Das and M. Lock (eds.) Social Suffering. Pgs. 99118. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Dembour, M. (2001) Following the Movement of the Pendulum: between universalism
and relativism. In J. Cowan, M. Dembour and R. Wilson (eds.) Culture and
Rights: Anthropological Perspectives. Pgs. 56-79. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Feldman, A. (1994) Formations of Violence: the narrative of the body and political
terror in Northern Ireland. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Henry, D. (2006) Violence and the Body: somatic expressions of trauma and
vulnerability during war. Medical Anthropology Quarterly 20(3): 379-398.
Scheper-Hughes (1996) Theft of Life: the globalization of organ stealing rumours.
Anthropology Today 12(3): 3-11.
10
11
Further Readings:
Enns, D. (2004) Bare Life and the Occupied Body. Theory & Event 7(3).
Neal, A. (2006) Foucault in Guantnamo: Towards an Archaeology of the Exception.
Security Dialogue 37(1): 31-46.
Humphreys, S. (2006) Legalizing Lawlessness: On Giorgio Agambens State of
Exception. European Journal of International Law 17(3): 677-87.
Agamben, G. (2005) State of Exception. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kelly, T. and A. Shah (2006) The Double-edged Sword: protection and state violence.
Critique of Anthropology 26(3): 251-257.
Feuchtwang, S. (2006) Images of Sub-humanity and their realization. Critique of
Anthropology 26(3): 259-278.
Sluka, J. (2000) Death Squad: the anthropology of state terror. Philadelphia, PA:
University of Pennsylvania Press.
Taussig, M. (1989) Terror as Usual: Walter Benjamins theory of history as a state of
siege. Social Text 23: 3-20.
Feldman A. (2004) On Cultural Anesthesia: from Desert Storm to Rodney King.
American Ethnologist 21(2): 404-418.
WEEK 10: Peace and Reconciliation
Why do we find more violence in some societies than in others? Can we really talk about
cultures of violence or peaceful societies? This week we will look at ethnographic case
studies of societies in which violence and aggressive behaviour are, according to the
ethnographers, completely unacceptable and seldom observed. We will look critically at these
representations of society as well as examine how peace is made in the aftermath of violent
conflict. What are some of the key challenges to reconciliation?
Essential readings:
Sponsel, L. (1996) The Natural History of peace: a positive view of human nature and its
potential. In T, Gregor (ed.) A Natural History of Peace. Pgs. 95-116. Vanderbilt
University Press.
Allen, T. (2007) The International Criminal Court and the Invention of Traditional Justice
in northern Uganda. Politique Africaine 107: 147-166.
Nordstrom, C. (2004) Shadows of War: violence, power, and international profiteering in
the twenty-first century. (Part 4: Peace? Pgs. 141-202). Berkeley: University of
California Press.
Further Readings:
Sponsel, L. (1994) The Mutual Relevance of Anthropology and Peace Studies. In The
Anthropology of Peace and Non-Violence. Boulder: Cynne Rienner. (Chapter 1)
Robarchek, C. and C. Robarchek (1998) Reciprocities and Realities: world views,
peacefulness, and violence among Semai and Waorani. Aggressive Behavior 24:
123-133.
Briggs, J. (2000) Conflict Management in a Modern Inuit Community. In P. Schweitzer,
M. Biesele, and R. Hitchcock (eds.) Hunters and Gatherers in the Modern World:
conflict, resistance, and self-determination. New York: Berghahn.
Howell S. (1989) To be angry is not to be human, but to be fearful is: Chewong
concepts of human nature of Howell, S. and R. Willis (eds.) Societies at Peace:
anthropological perspectives. London: Routledge. (chapter 2)
Campbell, A. (1989) Peace. In S. Howell & R. Willis (eds.) Societies at Peace:
anthropological perspectives. 213-224. (chapter 11)
Evans Pim, J. (2010) Nonkilling Societies. Honolulu, HI: Center for Global Nonkilling.
12