Professional Documents
Culture Documents
COAL PROCESSING
WORLD BANK GROUP
www.ifc.org/ifcext/enviro.nsf/Content/EnvironmentalGuidelines
The EHS Guidelines contain the performance levels and
Applicability
1.0
Industry-Specific Impacts
and Management
requirements;
Use of centrifugal (cyclone) collectors followed by highefficiency venturi aqueous scrubbers for thermal dryers;
1.1
Environmental
Air emissions
Wastewater
Hazardous materials
Wastes
Noise
Air Emissions
Fugitive Particulate Matter and Gaseous Emissions
pollutants include:
be considered;
For example, according to API Standard 650: Welded Steel Tanks for Oil
Storage (1998), new, modified, or restructured tanks with a capacity greater or
equal to 40,000 gallons and storing liquids with a vapor pressure greater or
equal than 0.75 psi but less than 11.1 psi, or a capacity greater or equal to
20,000 gallons and storing liquids with a vapor pressure greater or equal than 4
psi but less than 11.1 psi must be equipped with: fixed roof in conjunction with
an internal floating roof with a liquid mounted mechanical shoe primary seal; or
external floating roof with a liquid mounted mechanical shoe primary seal and
continuous rim-mounted secondary seal, with both seals meeting certain
minimum gap requirements and gasketed covers on the roof fittings; or closed
vent system and 95% effective control device.
3 Worker access into tanks should be conducted following permit-required
confined space entry procedures as noted in the General EHS Guidelines.
Exhaust Gases
Guidelines.
disposal.
the following:
and
rates;
considered.
acids) and minor amounts of ketones, should be recirculated inside the F-T Synthesis Unit to recover the
Wastewater
column;
include:
treatment system;
provided below.
unit.
Guidelines;
recommendations.
Hazardous Materials
Wastes
and coal storage sludge. Coal bottom ash and slag5 are the
from the bottom of gasifiers. Fly ash is also captured from the
process.
removal, activated carbon filters and oily sludge from oil water
sludge.
Spent Catalysts
Spent catalysts result from catalyst bed replacement in
scheduled turnarounds of SynGas desulphurization, Fischer
Tropsch (F-T) reaction, isomerization, catalytic cracking, and
methanol syntheses. Spent catalysts may contain zinc, nickel,
iron, cobalt, platinum, palladium, and copper, depending on the
particular process.
Recommended waste management strategies for spent
catalysts include the following:
storage and transport until they can reach the final point of
pozzolanic material.
Where due to its toxic / radioactive characteristics or
unavailability of commercially and technically viable alternatives
these materials can not be recycled, they should be disposed of
in a licensed landfill facility designed and operated according to
good international industry practice.6
facility.
Heavy Ends
Oxygen-Deficient Atmospheres
Inhalation hazards
a dedicated burner.
Process Safety
Noise
kinetics;
1.2
[QRA].
atmospheres include:
Process Safety
Inhalation Hazards
and
Hazards).
Oxygen-Deficient Atmosphere
The potential releases and accumulation of nitrogen gas into
work areas can result in asphyxiating conditions due to the
displacement of oxygen by these gases. Prevention and control
measures to reduce risks of asphyxiant gas release include:
Working areas with the potential for oxygen enriched atmospheres should be
equipped with area monitoring systems capable of detecting such conditions.
Workers also should be equipped with personal monitoring systems. Both types
of monitoring systems should be equipped with a warning alarm set at 23.5
percent concentration of O2 in air.
7
8 Working areas with the potential for oxygen deficient atmospheres should be
equipped with area monitoring systems capable of detecting such conditions.
Workers also should be equipped with personal monitoring systems. Both types
of monitoring systems should be equipped with a warning alarm set at 19.5
percent concentration of O2 in air.
10
fire.
following:
machinery.
11
Coal Processing
tanks,
propagation of fire.
1.3
For example, NFPA Standard 30: Flammable and Combustible Liquids Code
(2003).
11
12
2.0
2.1
Environment
this document.
Environmental Monitoring
13
Guideline
Value
Unit
Pollutant
Unit
pH
Guideline
Value
6-9
BOD5
mg/l
COD
mg/l
mg/l
30
150 (40 cooling
water)
5
mg/Nm 3
70
20
mg/Nm 3
40
Total nitrogen
mg/l
10
10
Total phosphorous
mg/l
10
Sulfide
mg/l
mg/l
10
TSS
mg/l
35
Total metals
mg/l
Cadmium
mg/l
0.1
Chromium (total)
mg/l
0.5
SO2
mg/Nm 3
150-200
NOx
mg/Nm 3
200-400 (1)
Hg
mg/Nm 3
1.0
Particulate Matter
mg/Nm
30-50
Chromium (hexavalent)
mg/l
0.1
VOC
mg/Nm 3
150
Copper
mg/l
0.5
mg/Nm
1.5
Cobalt
mg/l
0.5
H2S
mg/Nm 3
10(2)
Zinc
mg/l
Lead
mg/l
0.5
Iron
mg/l
Nickel
mg/l
Mercury
mg/l
0.02
Vanadium
mg/l
Manganese
mg/l
Phenol
mg/l
0.5
Cyanides
mg/l
0.5
COS + CS2
mg/Nm 3
Ammonia
mg/Nm 3
30
(1)
Notes:
1. Lower value for plants of >100 MWth equivalent; higher value for plants of
<100 MWth equivalent.
2. Emissions from Claus unit (Austria, Belgium, Germany).
- Process emissions levels should be reviewed in consideration of utility
source emissions to arrive at the lowest overall emission rate for the facility.
- Dry gas 15% O2
Unit
Industry
Benchmark
Electric Power
Electric power
consumption of Coalto-Liquid plants
0.05 0.1
Electric Power
consumption of
methanol plants
0.07
14
Industry
Benchmark
Unit
SO2
g/Nm 3 of SynGas
0.3 - 0.5
SO2 (Coal-MethanolGasoline)(4)
tons/day
6-14
tons/day
9-14
g/Nm 3 of SynGas
0.35-0.6
NOX (Coal-MethanolGasoline)(4)
tons/day
5-15.5
NOX (Fischer-Tropsch)(4)
tons/day
5-23.6
g/Nm 3 of SynGas
0.12
Particulates (Coal-MethanolGasoline)(4)
tons/day
0.5-7.5
Particulates (FischerTropsch)(4)
tons/day
1-6
kg/kg of coal
1.5
tons/day
21,000
g/Nm 3 of SynGas
0.004
kg/ton of coal
50 200
NOX
PM10
CO2(2)(3)
CO2 (Coal-Methanol-Gasoline
and Fischer-Tropsch)(4)
Ammonia
Solid Waste (ash, slag and
sulfur)(2)
Notes:
1. Production: 1,300 1,500 Nm of SynGas/t of coal
2. According to rank and grade of coal; calculated for a GHP = 30 GJ/kg
3. Without carbon capture and sequestration (CCS)
4. Reference: Edgar, T.F. (1983). For a 50,000 bbl/day coal liquefaction
facility
3
2.2
15
3.0
Edgar, T.F. 1983. Coal Processing and Pollution Control. Houston: Gulf
Publishing Company.
European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD). Sub-sectoral
Environmental Guidelines: Coal Processing. London: EBRD. Available at
http://www.ebrd.com
European Commission. 2006. European Integrated Pollution Prevention and
Control Bureau (EIPPCB). Best Available Techniques (BAT) Reference
Document for Large Combustion Plants. July 2006. Sevilla, Spain: EIPPCB.
Available at http://eippcb.jrc.es/pages/FActivities.htm
European Commission. 2003. European Integrated Pollution Prevention and
Control Bureau (EIPPCB). Best Available Techniques (BAT) Reference
Document for Mineral Oil and Gas Refineries. February 2003. Sevilla, Spain:
EIPPCB. Available at http://eippcb.jrc.es/pages/FActivities.htm
German Federal Ministry of the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear
Safety (BMU). 2002. First General Administrative Regulation Pertaining to the
Federal Emission Control Act (Technical Instructions on Air Quality Control TA
Luft). Bonn: BMU. Available at
http://www.bmu.de/english/air_pollution_control/ta_luft/doc/36958.php
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). 2006. Special Report,
Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage, March 2006. Geneva: IPCC.
Kirk-Othmer, R.E. 2006. Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology. 5th Edition. New
York: John Wiley and Sons Ltd.
Lockhart, N. 2002. Advances in Coal Preparation. London: World Energy
Council. Available at http://www.worldenergy.org/wecgeis/publications/default/tech_papers/17th_congress/1_2_02.asp
National Fire Protection Association (NFPA). 2004. Standard 120: Standard for
Fire Prevention and Control in Coal Mines. 2004 Edition. Quincy, MA: NFPA.
NFPA. 2000. Standard 850: Recommended Practice for Fire Protection for
Electric Generating Plants and High Voltage Direct Current Converter Stations.
2000 Edition. Quincy, MA: NFPA.
Northeast States for Coordinated Air Use Management (NESCAUM). 2003.
Mercury Emissions from Coal -Fired Power Plants: The Case for Regulatory
Action. October 2003. Boston, MA: NESCAUM
United States (US) Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 2005. 40 CFR Part
60, Standards of Performance for New and Existing Stationary Sources: Electric
Utility Steam Generating Units, Clean Air Mercury Rule. Washington, DC: US
EPA.
US EPA. 40 CFR Part 60. Standards of Performance for New Stationary
Sources. Subpart YStandards of Performance for Coal Preparation Plants.
Washington, DC: US EPA.
US EPA. 40 CFR Part 434Coal Mining Point Source Category BPT, BAT, BCT
Limitations and New Source Performance Standards. Washington, DC: US EPA.
United States Congress. 2005. Clean Skies Act of 2005. (Inhofe, S.131 in 109th
Congress). Washington, DC: Library of Congress. Available at
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c109:S.131:
University of New Hampshire Recycled Materials Resource Center (RMRC).
Coal Bottom Ash/Boiler Slag. Available at http://www.rmrc.unh.edu/
Zhu D. and Y. Zhang. Major trends of new technologies for coal mining and
utilization beyond 2000 - Technical scenario of the chinese coal industry. China
Coal Research Institute, Ministry of Coal Industry, Beijing, China. Available at
http://www.worldenergy.org/wecgeis/publications/default/tech_papers/17th_congress/3_1_11.asp
Ullmanns Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry. 2005. Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH
& Co. Available at http://www.wileyvch.de/vch/software/ullmann/index.php?page=home
NFPA. 2003. Standard 30: Flammable and Combustible Liquids Code. 2003
Edition. Quincy, MA: NFPA.
16
Fixed
Carbon (1)
(%)
min max
Anthracitic
Nonagglomerating
Bituminous
Commonly
agglomerating
Meta-anthracite
Anthracite
Semianthracite
Low volatile
Medium volatile
High volatile
98
92
86
78
69
98
92
86
78
69
Volatile
Matter (1)
(%)
min
max
2
8
14
22
31
2
8
14
22
31
Notes:
(1) Dry, mineral-matter-free basis
Coal
Coal is one of the worlds most plentiful energy resources, and
A.1.18
18
Coal Gasification
Coal gasification plants widely differ in size according to the final
destination of the produced SynGas. In chemical manufacturing,
typical design capacity is based on a feed rate of 1,500-2,000
tons per day (t/d) of coal. Larger capacities are possible,
especially for methanol production. In the case of liquid fuel
manufacturing, existing facilities use 120,000 t/d (ca. 40
17
flowing out from the reactor may be quenched and cooled and
from the bottom of the reactor, together with tar, either solid or
steam and fed to the shift reactor to adjust the H2/CO ratio to the
Fixed-Bed Reactors
Countercurrent, fixed-bed gasifiers were among the earlier types
of reactors to be developed. In this process, air and steam are
introduced at the bottom and travel upward through a coal bed.
Coal is fed onto the top of the bed and travels downward
countercurrent to the flow of gases. Fixed beds have several
advantages. The flow of the hot gases up from the combustion
19
18
heating. These coals may disrupt gas and solid flows, leading to
avoid sticky solids entering the raw fuel gas cooler. The raw gas
process failure.
Fluidized-Bed Reactors
Fluidized-bed gasifiers enable improved mixing and uniformity of
temperatures, allowing oxygen to react with the devolatilization
products. In dry fluidized-bed gasifiers, temperatures have to be
maintained below the ash melting point, causing incomplete
carbon conversion for unreactive coals. Agglomerating ash
gasifiers operate at higher temperatures (up to 1,150 C), near
the ash softening point, allowing improved carbon conversion
and gasification of unreactive high rank coals and caking coals.
The higher temperatures increase gasification rates, coal output
and efficiency. The primary advantage of fluid-bed gasifiers is
the flexibility to use caking coals, as well as low quality coals of
high ash content. In addition, a fluid-bed gasifier is able to
Entrained-Flow Reactors
In this type of reactor, gasifiers may be dry-feed, pressurized,
oxygen-blown, entrained-flow slagging type. The coal is dried
and pulverized to particle diameter < 0.1 mm, prior to being fed
into the gasifier with a transport gas, generally nitrogen. Coal,
the cooling coils inside the reactor to generate steam. The light
passes into a slag quench bath. The raw fuel gas can be
lower the temperature below the melting point of the ash, and
APRIL 30, 2007
conditions of about 340C and 2.5 MPa, are in the vapor phase.
metals.
internal cyclones.
Oxygenate Hydrogenation
Alkylation
alcohol mixture.
Ammonia Production
Isomerization
Catalytic Cracking
and iron.
Methanol Production
The methanol synthesis unit typically involves reaction, gas
recycling, and purification. In the reaction, carbon monoxide and
hydrogen react at about 250C and 50-80 bar in the presence of
a copper-based catalyst to yield methanol. Commercially
available reactors include fixed bed tubular or multi-beds
adiabatic radial types. Down-stream of the reactor, methanol is
condensed and the unconverted gas is recycled to the SynGas
production unit. The purification section involves two
fractionation towers where both light-ends and heavy-ends (high
molecular weight alcohols) are removed from methanol product.
Light-ends are typically recovered as fuel gas. Heavy-ends are
typically burned in a steam boiler through a dedicated burner.
21
Coal
preparation
Air
separation
unit
Steam
Oxygen
Gasification
Nitrogen
HP-BFW
Steam
Cooler
Ashes
and tar
HP
steam
Water-gas
shift
Air
Raw SynGas
Wastewater
SynGas
purification
SynGas
Hydrogen
sulfide
oxydation
Sulfur
Vent gas
22