Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Nicolas vs Romulo
GR No. 175888
97212 dated January 2, 2007 ismatter of fact, the VFA has been
MODIFIED.
The
Visiting
Forcesimplemented and executed, with the
Agreement
(VFA)
between
theUS faithfully complying with its
Republic of the Philippines and the obligation to produce L/CPL Smith
United States, entered into onbefore the court during the trial.
February 10, 1998, is UPHELD as
VFA is covered by implementing
constitutional, but the Romulo-Kenneylegislation, namely, the Case-Zablocki
Agreements of December 19 and 22,Act, USC Sec. 112(b) , inasmuch as it
2006 are DECLARED not in accordance is the very purpose and intent of the
with
the
VFA,
and
respondent US
Congress
that
executive
Secretary of Foreign Affairs is herebyagreements registered under this Act
ordered to forthwith negotiate with the within 60 days from their ratification
United States representatives for thebe immediately implemented. The
appropriate agreement on detentionparties to these present cases do not
facilities under Philippine authoritiesquestion the fact that the VFA has
as provided in Art. V, Sec. 10 of thebeen
registered
under
the
VFA, pending which the status quoCaseZablocki Act. In sum, therefore,
shall be maintained until furtherthe VFA differs from the Vienna
orders by this Court.
Convention on Consular Relations and
NOTE:
the Avena decision of the International
VFA
is
a
self-executingCourt of Justice (ICJ), subject matter of
Agreement , as that term is defined in the Medellin decision. The Convention
Medellin itself, because the partiesand the ICJ decision are not selfintend
its
provisions
to
beexecuting and are not registrable
enforceable , precisely because theunder the Case-Zablocki Act, and thus
Agreement is intended to carry out lack
legislative
implementing
obligations and undertakings underauthority.
the RP-US Mutual Defense Treaty. As a