Professional Documents
Culture Documents
DOI 10.1007/s10948-012-1931-4
O R I G I N A L PA P E R
Received: 5 November 2012 / Accepted: 30 November 2012 / Published online: 22 December 2012
Springer Science+Business Media New York 2012
1 Introduction
The importance of MgB2 lies in its simple crystal structure,
relatively high transition temperature (TC ) and low cost.
Nevertheless, its commercial utilization in high-field applications depends on the high critical current (JC ) of the bulk
M. Shahabuddin () I.A. Ansari N.S. Alzayed
Department of Physics and Astronomy, College of Science, King
Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
e-mail: mshahab@ksu.edu.sa
K.A. Ziq A.F. Salem
Department of Physics, College of Science, King Fahad
University of Petroleum and Minerals, Dehran, Saudi Arabia
where b = H /HC2 is the reduced field, HC2 is upper critical field and C is a constant depending on the sample
microstructure. The FP (b) shows a maximum at bpeak =
p/(p + q). The study of the normalized flux pinning force as
a function of the field gives the nature of the pinning mechanisms in a particular case [10]. For most of the superconductors JC becomes zero at fields lower than HC2 and, therefore,
the field H = H (JC 0) is used instead of HC2 to scale
the FP curves. In order to analyze the pinning properties of
MgB2 superconductors, H is the Hirr where the JC practically becomes zero.
Since the MgB2 possesses an intrinsic anisotropy
[11, 12], the super current never flows homogeneously in the
bulk sample when the magnetic field is applied as the differently oriented grains attain different properties. The clean
1548
2 Experimental
Four samples of Mg1x Znx B2 with the value of x ranging
from 0 to 0.06 were prepared using standard solid state reaction method under high vacuum as described elsewhere [18].
Here, the source of the Zn is the ZnO nano powder supplied by Sigma Aldriech. XRD measurements were carried
using the Cu K radiation for the phase identification. The
TC of the samples was determined from the ac susceptibility measurement using homemade susceptometer described
elsewhere [19]. The JC as a function of temperature and field
were calculated from MH loop using Beans critical state
model. The DC magnetizations of these samples were measured using a PAR-4500 Vibrating Sample Magnetometer
(VSM).
a ()
c ()
0 ( cm)
3.0875
3.5200
3.5
3.0870
3.5265
3.9
3.0865
3.5245
3.9
3.0860
3.5290
4.0
Fig. 3 JC as a function of H at
different temperatures for
Mg1x Znx B2 (Color figure
online)
1549
1550
strength is a function of the temperature. At lower temperatures (below 30 K), the pinning is higher in 2 % sample, in
comparison to that of 4 % sample and at higher temperature
(above 30 K) the pinning strength become weak and actual
connectivity of the grain is playing the role of carrying the
current. This explains the cross-over of the JC curves around
30 K for the two samples.
To understand the effect of nano ZnO doping on
JC (H, T ) we calculated the pinning force as a function
of magnetic field at different temperatures for different
samples and plotted the normalized volume pinning force
1551
Table 2 The value of bpeak = H /Hirr and bnpeak = H /Hn for all samples at different temperature
T (K) 0 %
2%
4%
6%
bpeak = H /Hirr bnpeak = H /Hn bpeak = H /Hirr bnpeak = H /Hn bpeak = H /Hirr bnpeak = H /Hn bpeak = H /Hirr bnpeak = H /Hn
04
0.14
0.31
0.131
0.33
0.131
0.3
0.1
0.21
10
0.13
0.29
0.18
0.36
0.18
0.35
0.11
0.21
15
0.15
0.30
0.17
0.36
0.17
0.32
20
0.16
0.34
0.18
0.39
0.18
0.34
0.19
30
0.16
0.32
0.19
0.41
0.19
0.4
0.21
0.37
35
0.18
0.35
0.18
0.38
0.21
0.34
0.34
in right column of Fig. 4. Of course it gives better overlapping of the data measured for the different temperatures. The
value of bpeak (the peak position in H /Hirr plot) and bnpeak
(the peak position in H /Hn plot) for different samples at
different temperature are shown Table 2. The error in the
value of the peak position at 4 K is large due to the flux
instability in the MH loop at lower field and difficult to
get accurate JC (H ). Eisterer has shown that bpeak or bnpeak
shift towards lower value as anisotropy increases. From the
Table 2, it is clear that the grain boundary pinning is dominant pinning mechanism in all four samples at different temperature. If we compare the value of bpeak of pure samples
with that of the doped sample it shows the doping has increased its value. This indicates that nano ZnO doping has
decreased the anisotropy from pure to dirty. The pure sample
is highly anisotropic while the 2 % and 4 % doped sample is
less anisotropic. The value of bpeak is nearly constant from
10 K to 35 K in 2 % and 4 % samples. From this one infers that the 2 % and 4 % samples are more homogeneous
in comparison to the 6 % sample in which bpeak varies with
temperature. Thus increasing the doping level decreases the
homogeneity of the samples.
In the magnetic field, the JC decreases faster in the pure
sample as compare to ones doped up to 4 % owing to higher
anisotropy in the former as compared to the latter. However,
further increase in the doping level not only causes the formation of voids and impurity phases at the grain boundaries,
but also increases the in-homogeneity in the sample. These
effects reduce the effective current carrying cross-sectional
area, thus leading to a decrease in the JC of the sample seen
at the 6 % doping concentration. In the present study, 2 %
doping of nano ZnO is the optimum value to get the better
JC (H, T ) behavior.
4 Conclusion
Using MH loop measurement, the JC (H ) of the 0 %, 2 %,
4 % and 6 % nano ZnO doped MgB2 samples were calculated at different temperatures. We find that the 2 % doped
sample shows the highest value of the JC at all fields and
1552
temperatures. The volume pinning force was analyzed using the scaling law proposed by Fietz and Webb [9]. It was
found that all samples show grain boundary pinning. The
pinning forces in the samples were also analyzed using the
scaling law proposed by Eisterer [20]. Toward this end, bpeak
for all samples at different temperatures has been tabulated.
The increase in the magnitude of the bpeak with the nano
ZnO doping indicates that the doping decreases the magnetic anisotropy of the samples. These bpeak values confirm
the occurrence of the grain boundary pinning. It can therefore be concluded that the decrease in the anisotropy is partially responsible for the enhancement of the JC (H ) values.
Acknowledgements This work was supported by NPST program
by King Saud University, Riyadh, under the project number 08ADV397-2.
References
1. Larbalestier, D.C., Gurevich, A., Feldmann, D.M., Polyanskii,
A.A.: High Tc superconducting materials for electric power applications. Nature 414, 368377 (2001)
2. Susner, M.A., Sumption, M.D., Bhatia, M., Peng, X., Tomsic,
M.J., Rindfleisch, M.A., Collings, E.W.: Influence of Mg/B ratio
and SiC doping on microstructure and high field transport Jc in
MgB2 strands. Physica C 456, 180187 (2007)
3. Putti, M., Affronte, M., Ferdeghini, C., Manfrinetti, P., Trantini,
C., Lehmann, E.: Observation of the crossover from two-gap to
single-gap superconductivity through specific heat measurements
in neutron-irradiated MgB2 . Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 077003 (2006)
4. Gumbel, A., Eckert, J., Fuchs, G., Nenkov, K., Muller, K.H.,
Schultz, L.: Improved superconducting properties in nanocrystalline bulk MgB2 . Appl. Phys. Lett. 80, 2725 (2002)
5. Singh, K.P., Awana, V.P.S., Balamurugan, S., Shahabuddin, M.,
Singh, H.K., Husain, M., Kishan, H., Bauminger, E.R., Felner, I.:
Nano Fe3 O4 induced fluxoid jumps and low field enhanced critical current density in MgB2 superconductor. J. Supercond. Nov.
Magn. 21, 3944 (2008)
6. Ansari, I.A., Shahabuddin, M., Zig, K.A., Salem, A.F., Awana,
V.P.S., Husain, M., Kishan, H.: The effect of nano-alumina on
structural and magnetic properties of MgB2 superconductors. Supercond. Sci. Technol. 20, 827 (2007)