Falling prices of oil around the globe, in line with increased production and lower demand in Europe and Asia, will have tremendous impact on both the global economy and geopolitics. APCO’s International Advisory Council discusses.
Falling prices of oil around the globe, in line with increased production and lower demand in Europe and Asia, will have tremendous impact on both the global economy and geopolitics. APCO’s International Advisory Council discusses.
Falling prices of oil around the globe, in line with increased production and lower demand in Europe and Asia, will have tremendous impact on both the global economy and geopolitics. APCO’s International Advisory Council discusses.
The Champion Brand | Global is Local | Know Whats Next | Integrated Insights | Return on Reputation
Global Implications of the Iran Nuclear Deal
he historic nuclear deal struck between the P5+1
and Iran has profound implications for the future of Tehran, the region and the world. The reintegration of Iran into the global economy will boost private sectors throughout the country and mitigate the importance of black markets, weakening hardliners and boosting the moderates. Nothing in the agreement removes or forbids sanctions on Iran based on human rights or support of terror groups, so those restrictions will remain in place. With the framework of the deal in place, the world is watching and waiting to see what will happen in the days ahead. Itamar Rabinovich, former ambassador of Israel to the United States, opened the discussion stating that there will be a heated debate in the United States for the next 60 days during which the Congress will debate the Iran deal, vote and likely veto. The debate around the deal ties into the presidential race and its not likely to abate before the election. He stated that his evaluation is that the administration will be able to keep the democrats in support of the deal because it is distinctly a partisan issue and because Congress, at the end of the day, tends not to obstruct the president on foreign policy issues. He continued to state that the deal itself - and weve heard numerous positions for and against it - is not as bad as some of the critics make it out to be and its not as great as the administration claims. It will be the legacy project of the Obama administrations foreign policy and an issue that has preoccupied the president since the primaries and the beginning of his term. The real question is the future. The deal takes back the Iranian nuclear program and checks it for 10 years, but the questions and the criticism is what will happen after 10 years? Are we mortgaging the future for the sake of the deal? Will the Iranians cheat and does the deal provide sufficient mechanisms for monitoring? How will the United States and other nations react if the Iranians are caught cheating? Thats the biggest question mark. Is a future president likely to use force? Or could the regime be rebuilt a few years down the road? And regionally there is a major concern about the impact on the politics of the region. 1
What will an unchanged Iran, with the influx of hundreds of
billions of dollars, do in places like Yemen, Syria, Lebanon and Iraq? There are very high emotions in the region and they are most vociferously expressed by Benjamin Netanyahu, the prime minister of Israel, who has made this his legacy project. He is perfectly messianic about it, and is taking the fight to the American domestic arena. Netanyahu needs to accept the deal and try to improve relations with the United States, primarily to negotiate with them on a defense package in coordination with the view of what happens in the region. But Netanyahu will likely continue to fight the president. He does not want to settle, at this point, on a package of compensation because he thinks this is a bad deal. He is banking on having a Republican victory in the 2016 elections. In the region itself, its not going to be the sole issue. As we go around to the different countries, the conflict continues in each of them in a different way. The Iranian deal, and reinforcements of Irans influence, is just going to exacerbate these conflicts, so we should anticipate a very active and tense period in the Middle East itself. Bruce Jentleson, former senior advisor to the U.S. State Department policy planning director, noted that when the United States had the arms control agreements with the Soviet Union, there was a full and serious debate in Congress; and its important that there be a constructive debate on Iran. The two lines of debate on the Iranian deal are: were the concessions made by Iran sufficient? And even if they are deemed sufficient, will they be verified and enforced? On this second question, many technical experts disagree. While its prudent to anticipate some cheating, U.S. secretary of energy Ernest Moniz, himself a distinguished nuclear scientist, has basically said that while we wont find everything, we believe we can find efforts that would have the most likely effect on Iran making serious progress to nuclear weapons. The sanctions are multi-faceted from a business perspective; the U.S. sanctions are falling into two categories. Primary sanctions, which affect U.S. companies and U.S. citizens, arent really being affected by the terms of the agreement largely until we get past Congressional action. Secondary sanctions, which are largely extraterritorial, apply to non-U.S. persons and companies through the use of financial transactions involving the dollar and certain licensing of U.S. technology. These are being more extensively loosened. From a business perspective, weve already seen the Europeans shifting to Iran. The French foreign minister was there this week and there was a German delegation there a couple of weeks ago. Germans have more than 2 billion euros in exports and believe they can double them fairly quickly.
The demographics in Iran are pretty interesting with about 60
percent of the 70+ million population under the age of 30; a society which in its own way has secular elements, the highest levels of literacy in the region other than Israel, and some sense that some of their policies may not be serving their interests as much as they once thought. The president opened the door on the possibility of broader changes in relations. For example, he said that Iran should be part of the conversation on Syria, which is very different than the U.S. position a year and a half ago. So, there is risk in being both taken advantage of, giving up too much too quickly with too little in return, and there is also risk in not taking advantage of an opportunity and doing too little too slowly and having a possible window of opportunity for major change close. We dont know, but its important that people assess the risks on both sides and make their own judgment. There is not just risk on one side. Lalit Mansingh, former ambassador of India to the United States, commented that India welcomes the agreement. India has been working behind the scenes trying to persuade Americans and Iranians to put a deal in place. Prime Minister Modi invited President Rouhani to visit India, and India expects that once the sanctions are lifted there will be much closer commercial ties with the Iranians. At one time India received 20 percent of its oil from the Iranians, and that has dwindled because of the sanctions. Now India is embarking on a phase of close economic cooperation with Iran, particularly building a route through Iran through the Chabahar Port to Central Asia, which will bypass Pakistan. Mamoon Sbeih, managing director of APCO in the Middle East, said that the Iran deal is the key topic in the Gulf; and while there seems to be a single voice on the issue of the deal with Iran, in reality the attitude is quite different. Saudi Arabia is probably as opposed to the deal as Israel and Egypt, and they are very vocal about it. They believe this will strengthen Irans hand and it has nothing to do with the nuclear aspect. That is the biggest issue in the Middle East and the biggest concern the Saudis have raised. So in a sense, there is a lot of dissatisfaction with Irans attitude towards the region and the opposition to the deal has a lot to do with that. Key takeaways: 1. The deal is not as bad as some of the critics make it out to be and it is not as great as the U.S. administration claims. 2. There is risk in giving up too much too quickly with too little in return, and in not taking advantage of an opportunity and doing too little too slowly and having a possible window of opportunity for major change close. 3. The biggest issue in the Middle East is the dissatisfaction with Irans attitude towards the region. 4. There is an opportunity for those businesses who carefully look at the sanctions and identify what is allowed or not in considering this new market as it is opening up. Driving Global Dialogue For more information, please visit www.apcoworldwide.com/forum 2015 APCO Worldwide Inc. All rights reserved.