Professional Documents
Culture Documents
FACTS:
Petitioner Macalintal files a petition for certiorari and
prohibition, seeking a declaration that certain
provisions of R.A. No. 9189 (The Overseas Absentee
Voting Act of 2003) are unconstitutional. The Court
upholds petitioners right to file the instant petition,
stating in essence that the petitioner has seriously and
convincingly presented an issue of transcendental
significance to the Filipino people, considering that
public funds are to be used and appropriated for the
implementation of said law.
ARGUMENTS:
Petitioner raises three principal questions for
contention:
(1) That Section 5(d) of R.A. No. 9189 allowing the
registration of voters who are immigrants or permanent
residents in other countries, by their mere act of
executing an affidavit expressing their intention to
return to the Philippines, violates the residency
requirement in Art. V, Sec. 1 of the Constitution;
(2) That Section 18.5 of the same law empowering the
COMELEC to proclaim the winning candidates for
national offices and party list representatives, including
the President and the Vice-President, violates the
constitutional mandate under Art. VII, Sec. 4 of the
Constitution that the winning candidates for President
and Vice-President shall be proclaimed as winners
only by Congress; and
(3) That Section 25 of the same law, allowing Congress
(through the Joint Congressional Oversight Committee
created in the same section) to exercise the power to
review, revise, amend, and approve the Implementing
Rules and Regulations (IRR) that the COMELEC shall
promulgate, violates the independence of the
COMELEC under Art. IX-A, Sec. 1 of the Constitution.
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW 1
ISSUES:
1) Whether or not Section 5(d) of R.A. No. 9189 is
violative of Art. V, Sec. 1 of the Constitution.
2) Whether or not Section 18.5 of R.A. No. 9189 is
violative of Art. VII, Sec. 4 of the Constitution.
3) Whether or not Section 25 of R.A. No. 9189 is
violative of Art. IX-A, Sec. 1 of the Constitution.
HELD:
1) NO. Section 5(d) of R.A. No. 9189 is not violative
of Art. V, Sec. 1 of the Constitution.
2) YES. Section 18.5 of R.A. No. 9189, with respect
only to the votes of the President and Vice-President,
and not to the votes of the Senators and party-list
representatives, is violative of Art. VII, Sec. 4 of the
Constitution.
3) YES. Section 25 of R.A. No. 9189, with respect
only to the second sentence in its second paragraph
allowing Congress to exercise the power to review,
revise, amend, and approve the IRR that the
COMELEC shall promulgate, is violative of Art. IX-A,
Sec. 1 of the Constitution.
REASONS:
1) Section 5(d) of R.A. No. 9189, entitled An Act
Providing for a System of Overseas Absentee Voting
by Qualified Citizens of the Philippines Abroad,
Appropriating Funds Therefor, and for Other
Purposes, provides:
Sec. 5. Disqualifications.The following shall be
disqualified from voting under this Act:
xxx
xxx
xxx
affidavit shall also state that he/she has not applied for
citizenship in another country. Failure to return shall be
cause for the removal of the name of the immigrant or
permanent resident from the National Registry of
Absentee Voters and his/her permanent
disqualification to vote in absentia.
Petitioner posits that Section 5(d) is unconstitutional in
that it violates the requirement that the voter must be a
resident in the Philippines for at least one year and in
the place where he proposes to vote for at least six
months immediately preceding the election, as
provided under Section 1, Article V of the Constitution
which reads: Sec. 1. Suffrage may be exercised by all
citizens of the Philippines not otherwise disqualified by
law, who are at least eighteen years of age, and who
shall have resided in the Philippines for at least one
year and in the place wherein they propose to vote for
at least six months immediately preceding the
election.
For the resolution of this instant issue, the Court has
relied on, among others, the discussions of the
members of the Constitutional Commission on the
topics of absentee voting and absentee voter
qualification, in connection with Sec. 2, Art. V of the
Constitution, which reads: Sec. 2. The Congress shall
provide a system for securing the secrecy and sanctity
of the ballot as well as a system for absentee voting by
qualified Filipinos abroad. It was clearly shown from
the said discussions that the Constitutional
Commission intended to enfranchise as much as
possible all Filipino citizens abroad who have not
abandoned their domicile of origin, which is in the
Philippines. The Commission even intended to extend
to young Filipinos who reach voting age abroad whose
parents domicile of origin is in the Philippines, and
consider them qualified as voters for the first time.
It is in pursuance of that intention that the Commission
provided for Section 2 immediately after the residency
requirement of Section 1. By the doctrine of necessary
implication in statutory construction, which may be
applied in construing constitutional provisions, the
strategic location of Section 2 indicates that the
Constitutional Commission provided for an exception to
the actual residency requirement of Section 1 with
respect to qualified Filipinos abroad. The same
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW 1
xxx
xxx
xxx
xxx
The returns of every election for President and VicePresident, duly certified by the board of canvassers of
each province or city, shall be transmitted to the
Congress, directed to the President of the Senate.
Upon receipt of the certificates of canvass, the
xxx
xxx
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW 1
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW 1