You are on page 1of 6

8838 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No.

32 / Friday, February 15, 2008 / Proposed Rules

Please note that if EPA receives adverse the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Stevens Fishery Conservation and
comment on an amendment, paragraph, Conservation and Management Act, the Management Act as amended by the
or section of this rule and if that Coast Guard Act, the FMP, and other Consolidated Appropriations Act of
provision may be severed from the applicable law. 2004 (Public Law 108–199, section 801).
remainder of the rule, EPA may adopt DATES: Comments must be received no Amendments 18 and 19 to the FMP
as final those provisions of the rule that later than March 17, 2008. amended the FMP to include the Crab
are not the subject of an adverse Rationalization Program. A final rule
ADDRESSES: Send comments to Sue
comment. implementing these amendments was
Salveson, Assistant Regional
For additional information, see the published on March 2, 2005 (70 FR
Administrator, Sustainable Fisheries
direct final rule which is located in the 10174).
Division, Alaska Region, NMFS, Attn:
Rules section of this Federal Register.
Ellen Sebastian. You may submit Crab Rationalization Program
Dated: February 1, 2008. comments, identified by ‘‘RIN 0648– (Program)
Ira W. Leighton, AV19’’, by any one of the following To implement the Program in 2005,
Acting Regional Administrator, EPA New methods: NMFS initially issued processing quota
England. • Electronic Submissions: Submit all shares (PQS), catcher vessel owner
[FR Doc. E8–2746 Filed 2–14–08; 8:45 am] electronic public comments via the quota share (CVO QS), and catcher
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P Federal eRulemaking Portal website at processor owner quota share (CPO QS)
http://www.regulations.gov. to eligible applicants. NMFS issued PQS
• Mail: P. O. Box 21668, Juneau, AK and QS for nine crab fisheries in the
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 99802. BSAI. In 2006, NMFS initially issued
• Fax: (907) 586–7557. Bristol Bay red king crab (Paralithodes
National Oceanic and Atmospheric • Hand delivery to the Federal camtschaticus) and snow crab
Administration Building: 709 West 9th Street, Room (Chionoecetes opilio) PQS to the Blue
420A, Juneau, AK. Dutch, LLC, under the requirements of
50 CFR Part 680 All comments received are a part of section 417 of the Coast Guard Act.
[Docket No. 070718364–7908–02] the public record and will generally be CVO QS represents an exclusive but
posted to http://www.regulations.gov revocable privilege that authorizes the
RIN 0648–AV19 without change. All Personal Identifying holder to receive an annual allocation to
Information (e.g., name, address) harvest a specific percentage of the total
Fisheries of the Exclusive Economic
voluntarily submitted by the commenter allowable catch (TAC) from a fishery.
Zone Off Alaska; Bering Sea and
may be publicly accessible. Do not The annual allocations of TACs, in
Aleutian Islands Crab Rationalization
submit confidential business pounds, are referred to as individual
Program
information or otherwise sensitive or fishing quotas (IFQs).
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries protected information. PQS represents an exclusive but
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and NMFS will accept anonymous revocable privilege to receive deliveries
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), comments. Attachments to electronic of a specific portion of the annual TAC
Commerce. comments will be accepted in Microsoft from a fishery. An annual allocation of
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for Word, Excel, WordPerfect, or Adobe PQS is referred to as individual
comments. portable document file (pdf) formats processing quota (IPQ) and expressed in
only. pounds of crab. Harvesters holding CVO
SUMMARY: NMFS proposes regulations Written comments regarding the IFQ must deliver a portion of their IFQ
implementing Amendment 25 to the burden-hour estimates or other aspects to processors with a like amount of IPQ
Fishery Management Plan for Bering of the collection-of-information available.
Sea/Aleutian Islands King and Tanner requirements contained in this rule may For most crab fisheries, CVO QS and
Crabs (FMP) and a provision of the be submitted to NMFS at the above PQS is designated for specific
Coast Guard and Maritime address, and by email to geographic regions. Crab harvested with
Transportation Act of 2006 (Coast Guard DavidlRostker@omb.eop.gov or fax to regionally designated CVO QS is
Act). These proposed regulations would 202–395–7285. required to be delivered to a processor
amend the Crab Rationalization Copies of Amendment 25 and the in the designated region. Likewise, a
Program. Amendment 25 to the FMP Regulatory Impact Review (RIR) for this processor with regionally designated
satisfies the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery action may be obtained from the NMFS PQS is required to accept delivery of
Conservation and Management Alaska Region at the address above or and process crab in the designated
Reauthorization Act of 2006 from the Alaska Region website at region. Two regional designations were
requirement for the Secretary of http://www.fakr.noaa.gov/ created for the snow crab and Bristol
Commerce to amend the FMP to sustainablefisheries.htm. Bay red king crab fisheries. The North
authorize conversion of catcher vessel Region consists of all areas in the Bering
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
owner quota shares and processor quota Sea north of 56°20′ N. latitude. The
shares to newly created converted Glenn Merrill, 907–586–7228,
South Region is all other areas. The
catcher processor owner quota shares. glenn.merrill@noaa.gov or Gretchen
regional designation of CVO QS and
The Secretary approved Amendment 25 Harrington, 907–586–7228,
PQS preserves the historic geographic
on April 12, 2007. The Coast Guard Act gretchen.harrington@noaa.gov.
distribution of landings in the fisheries.
mandates the Secretary to issue SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The king CPO QS represents an exclusive but
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSALS

processing quota share to Blue Dutch, and Tanner crab fisheries in the revocable privilege to harvest a
LLC, under specific conditions. This exclusive economic zone of the Bering percentage of the TAC and process that
proposed action is necessary to Sea/Aleutian Islands are managed under crab onboard. Under the Program, CPO
implement Amendment 25 and the the FMP. The FMP was prepared by the QS does not have regional designations
Coast Guard Act. This action is intended North Pacific Fishery Management and is not required to be delivered to a
to promote the goals and objectives of Council (Council) under the Magnuson- processor holding available IFQ.

VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:07 Feb 14, 2008 Jkt 214001 PO 00000 Frm 00014 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15FEP1.SGM 15FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 32 / Friday, February 15, 2008 / Proposed Rules 8839

Coast Guard Act fisheries are subject to this provision, would be eligible for the second type of
On July 11, 2006, the President signed converted CPO QS would be created for conversion. These entities would elect
the Coast Guard Act which contained in only the snow crab and Bristol Bay red on an annual basis whether to receive
section 417 a provision mandating the king crab fisheries, because these were converted CPO QS and the amount of
Secretary of Commerce to issue PQS for the only fisheries for which the eligible North CVO QS and North PQS they
the Bristol Bay red king crab and the entities were initially issued North PQS wish to convert by completing the
Bering Sea snow crab fisheries to Blue and North CVO QS, as specified in the annual application for converted CPO
MSRA. QS/IFQ permit and submitting that
Dutch, LLC, under two specific
NMFS published the notice of application along with the annual
conditions.
availability for Amendment 25 on application for crab IFQ/IPQ permit by
First, NMFS must issue Blue Dutch
February 5, 2007 (72 FR 5255), with a August 1 for that crab fishing year.
PQS equal to 0.75 percent of the total
public comment period that closed on Entities applying for a converted CPO
number of PQS units. NMFS issued an April 6, 2007. NMFS received one
initial administrative determination on QS permit and resulting CPO IFQ would
public comment on Amendment 25. The be required to provide information on
July 31, 2006, to issue Blue Dutch commenter opposed Amendment 25
3,015,229 units of Bristol Bay red king any person who is affiliated, as the term
because she is quite concerned about ‘‘affiliation’’ is defined at § 680.2, to that
crab PQS and 7,516,253 units of snow the legislation. The Secretary of
crab PQS. NMFS assigned a regional entity and indicate the amount of PQS
Commerce approved Amendment 25 on and CVO QS in either the BBR or BSS
designation to the PQS units issued to April 12, 2007. This proposed rule is
Blue Dutch according to the procedures crab QS fishery with a north region
necessary to implement Amendment 25. designation for issuance as converted
established in the regulations at 50 CFR This proposed rule would authorize
680.40(b)(2)(iv). CPO QS.
two types of quota share conversions The proposed rule specifies a number
Second, NMFS must issue IPQ for that and define the entities eligible to make
PQS whenever the TAC for that fishery of provisions for converted QS/IFQ to
those conversions. conform with the MSRA and the
is more than 2 percent higher than the First, an eligible entity holding PQS,
most recent TAC in effect for that Program’s implementing regulations.
along with its commonly owned
fishery prior to September 15, 2005. The Converted CPO QS and the resulting
affiliates, could combine its North CVO
TAC used for this calculation is the total QS for Bristol Bay red king crab or snow CPO IFQ would not be transferable. This
TAC, which includes the CDQ crab with its North PQS for that fishery restriction on transfers is consistent
allocation. Accordingly, NMFS and exchange these shares for converted with the MSRA eligibility standards that
determined that it will issue Bristol Bay CPO QS on an annual basis. Entities only entities that meet the specific
red king crab IPQ to Blue Dutch when could do this under the following two requirements of the Act are eligible to
the TAC for that fishery is greater than conditions: (1) if NMFS initially issued receive converted CPO QS. However,
15,732,480 lb (7,136.1 mt). NMFS will the entity both CPO QS and PQS under CPO IFQ derived from converted CPO
issue snow crab IPQ to Blue Dutch the Program, and that PQS, in QS may be issued to a cooperative.
when the TAC for that fishery is greater combination with the PQS of its The proposed rule specifies that (1)
than 21,350,640 lb (9,684.5 mt). This commonly owned affiliates, is less than eligible entities would receive one unit
proposed rule is necessary to specify in 7 percent of the total PQS pool for that of North CPO QS in exchange for one
regulations the statutory thresholds for year; or (2) if NMFS initially issued the unit of North CVO QS and 0.9 units of
annually issuing IPQ to Blue Dutch to entity CPO QS under the Program and North PQS and (2) the amount of IFQ
ensure the regulations implementing the PQS under the Coast Guard Act. An derived from the converted CPO QS
Program conform to the Coast Guard eligible entity would be limited to issued to each entity could not exceed
Act. The proposed rule prohibits the converting only the PQS that it, along one million pounds per fishery during
transfer of the PQS units issued under with its commonly owned affiliates, was any calendar year.
the Coast Guard Act because the Act initially issued by NMFS. Additionally, the proposed rule
explicitly requires NMFS to issue the Second, an eligible entity holding would implement the area of validity in
PQS to Blue Dutch. CVO QS, along with its commonly section 122(a)(4) of the MSRA by
owned affiliates, could combine its requiring that any crab harvested under
Amendment 25 North PQS for Bristol Bay red king crab a CPO IFQ permit derived from
On January 12, 2007, the President or snow crab with its North CVO QS for converted CPO QS must be offloaded in
signed the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery that fishery and exchange these shares the North Region, defined in the
Conservation and Management for converted CPO QS on an annual Program as the Bering Sea subarea north
Reauthorization Act of 2006 (MSRA, basis. The only entity that could do this of 56°20′ N. latitude.
Public Law 109–479), which added a would be an entity to which NMFS Converting PQS and CVO QS to
new requirement in section 122(a) for initially issued CPO QS and PQS under converted CPO QS would allow entities
the Secretary of Commerce, not later the Program, and that PQS, in to harvest and process crab onboard a
than 90 days after the date of enactment combination with the PQS of its catcher processor. Conversion could
of that act, to amend the FMP to modify commonly owned affiliates, is more reduce each eligible entity’s operating
the Program to authorize conversion of than 7 percent of the total PQS pool for costs associated with purchasing crab,
North CVO QS and North PQS to newly that year. This eligible entity would be processing crab on land or in a
created converted CPO QS. limited to converting only the CVO QS stationary floater processor, and
Amendment 25 to the FMP complies that it, along with its commonly owned complying with the Program’s
with the MSRA by amending the FMP affiliates, was initially issued by NMFS. arbitration system. NMFS can not
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSALS

to authorize an eligible entity and its According to the NMFS Official predict the annual amount of converted
commonly owned affiliates to combine Record, three individual entities are CPO QS that would be annually issued
North PQS and North CVO QS and eligible for these new provisions. because the participants would annually
exchange these shares for newly created Yardarm Knot, Inc., and Blue Dutch, elect to exercise this provision and need
converted CPO QS. While the MSRA LLC, would be eligible for the first type not request conversion of all CVO QS
does not specifically define which of conversion. Trident Seafoods, Inc., and PQS held.

VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:07 Feb 14, 2008 Jkt 214001 PO 00000 Frm 00015 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15FEP1.SGM 15FEP1
8840 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 32 / Friday, February 15, 2008 / Proposed Rules

Sections 122(b) and (c) of the MSRA Conservation and Management Act and crab and Bering Sea snow crab and
include additional requirements for fees other applicable laws. Tanner crab fisheries. In addition,
and off-loading for converted CPO QS; This proposed rule has been Yardarm Knot operates a salmon
however, the statute does not require determined to be not significant for processing plant in Naknek that
the Secretary of Commerce to purposes of Executive Order 12866. employs up to 450 people during the
implement these requirements and An Environmental Impact Statement/ peak season. Yardarm Knot
therefore they are not part of Regulatory Impact Review/Initial substantially exceeds the 500 employee
Amendment 25 and will not be Regulatory Flexibility Analysis/Social threshold applicable to shore-based
implemented by Federal rulemaking. Impact Assessment was prepared for the processing entities.
The MSRA requires the holder of Program that describes the management Blue Dutch operates vessels in the
converted CPO QS to pay a fee of five background, the purpose and need for crab and groundfish fisheries in the
percent of the ex-vessel value of the crab the Program, the management North Pacific. Blue North Fisheries (an
harvested with those shares to any local alternatives, and the environmental, affiliate of Blue Dutch) has a fleet of
governmental entities in the North social, and economic impacts (see seven catcher processors, ranging in size
Region, if the PQS used to produce the ADDRESSES). With this proposed rule, from 124 ft to 180 ft. The fleet primarily
converted CPO QS was originally NMFS is continuing to implement the participates in the hook-and-line Pacific
derived from the processing activities Program. cod fishery in the Bering Sea. Since
that occurred in a community under the Department of Commerce Chief Blue Dutch operates no shore-based
jurisdiction of those local governmental Counsel for Regulations has certified to
facilities, it is not regulated by this
entities. The State of Alaska may collect the Small Business Administration,
action as a shore-based facility. Instead
from the holder of the converted CPO under Section 605(b) of the Regulatory
it is subject to regulation as an at-sea
QS a fee of one percent of the ex-vessel Flexibility Act, that this proposed rule
operation and as a catcher vessel
value of the crab harvested with those would not have a significant economic
operation. Catch by Blue Dutch and its
shares. Additionally, crab harvested impact on a substantial number of small
affiliates substantially exceeds the $4.0
with converted CPO QS shall be off- entities. NMFS finds that the proposed
million annual gross receipts threshold
loaded in those communities receiving action is not likely to have the potential
applicable to at-sea operations and
the local governmental entities fee to have a significant economic impact
catcher vessels.
revenue. on any small entities participating in
these fisheries because no small entities Trident Seafoods operates 3 factory
Section 122(d) of the MSRA also
will be directly regulated by this action. trawlers that primarily target pollock in
provides that, as part of its periodic
Section 122(a) of the MSRA defines the Bering Sea. Trident also owns seven
review of the Program, the North Pacific
the entities eligible to elect to exercise at-sea processors that produce salmon,
Fishery Management Council may
this provision. According to the NMFS herring, crab, and groundfish products,
review the effects on communities in
Official Record, three individual entities eleven catcher vessels that target
the North Region of allowing the
are eligible under the MSRA for these pollock and Pacific cod, and five catcher
conversion to CPO QS. Under this
section, if the Council determines that new provisions; Yardarm Knot, Inc., vessels that primarily catch Bristol Bay
Amendment 25 adversely affects the Blue Dutch, LLC, and Trident Seafoods red king crab, Bering Sea snow crab, and
communities, the Council may Corporation. These three entities do not Tanner crab (C. bairdi). Trident operates
recommend to the Secretary of qualify as small entities according to the large shore-side processing plants in
Commerce, and the Secretary may Small Business Administration criteria. Akutan, St. Paul, Kodiak, and Sand
approve, changes to the Program The Small Business Administration Point, Alaska, in addition to smaller
necessary to mitigate those adverse has established size criteria for all major plants in other Alaska communities.
effects. industry sectors in the United States, The Akutan facility is the largest
Section 122(e) of the MSRA requires including fish harvesting and fish seafood processing plant in North
an additional FMP amendment and rule processing businesses. A business America, and processes pollock, crab,
making to modify the use caps for involved in fish harvesting is a small and halibut. The St. Paul plant
processing North Region snow crab. business if it is independently owned primarily processes crab, and the Sand
Under this section, custom processing and operated and not dominant in its Point and Kodiak facilities process
arrangements do not count against any field of operation (including its Pacific cod, sablefish, crab, halibut,
use cap for the processing of snow crab affiliates) and if it has combined annual pollock, salmon, and other groundfish.
in the North Region by a shore-based receipts not in excess of $4 million for Trident’s corporate offices are located in
crab processor. NMFS issued an all its affiliated operations worldwide. A Seattle, Washington, and the company
enforcement policy on January 19, 2007, seafood processor is a small business if also operates fish processing facilities in
that provides guidance to the industry it is independently owned and operated, Seattle, Anacortes, and Bellingham,
on NMFS’ enforcement and not dominant in its field of operation, Washington; Motley, Minnesota; and
interpretation of this section, which is and employs 500 or fewer persons on a Newport, Oregon. Trident substantially
effective until superseded by future full-time, part-time, temporary, or other exceeds the 500 employee threshold
rulemaking. At its December meeting, basis, at all its affiliated operations criterion applicable to shore-based
the Council adopted Amendment 27 to worldwide. A business involved in both processors.
the FMP that would implement this the harvesting and processing of seafood A Regulatory Impact Review was
MSRA provision. NMFS intends to products is a small business if it meets prepared to assess all costs and benefits
publish a proposed rule for Amendment the $4 million criterion for fish of available regulatory alternatives. The
27 in the spring of 2008. harvesting operations. Regulatory Impact Review describes the
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSALS

Yardarm Knot and its affiliates own potential size, distribution, and
Classification two large catcher processors, the magnitude of the economic impacts that
The Assistant Administrator for Highland Light and the Westward Wind. this action may be expected to have.
Fisheries, NOAA, has determined that The Highland Light primarily targets Copies of the RIR prepared for this
this proposed rule is consistent with the pollock, and the Westward Wind proposed rule are available from NMFS
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery participates in the Bristol Bay red king (see ADDRESSES).

VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:07 Feb 14, 2008 Jkt 214001 PO 00000 Frm 00016 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15FEP1.SGM 15FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 32 / Friday, February 15, 2008 / Proposed Rules 8841

Collection–of–Information § 680.2 Definitions. (ii) Applicant information. Enter


This proposed rule contains a * * * * * applicant’s name and NMFS Person ID;
collection–of–information requirement Converted CPO QS means CPO QS for applicant’s permanent business mailing
subject to review and approval by the the BBR and BSS crab QS fisheries that address and any temporary mailing
Office of Management and Budget is issued to the entities defined in address the applicant wishes to use; and
(OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction § 680.40(c)(5)(ii), (c)(5)(iii), or (c)(5)(iv) applicant’s business telephone number,
Act (PRA). This requirement has been based on the procedures established in facsimile number, and e-mail address.
submitted to OMB for approval. Public § 680.40(c)(5). (A) For Entity A or B.
reporting burden for annual application * * * * * (1) Identify the amount of CVO QS in
for converted CPO QS and CPO IFQ 3. In § 680.4, revise paragraph (b)(1) either the BBR or BSS crab QS fishery
permit is estimated to average 30 and add paragraphs (b)(3) and (n) to with a north region designation for
minutes per response, including the read as follows: issuance as converted CPO QS; and
time for reviewing instructions, (2) Identify the amount of PQS in
searching existing data sources, § 680.4 Permits. either the BBR or BSS crab QS fishery
gathering and maintaining the data * * * * * initially issued to you by NMFS with a
needed, and completing and reviewing (b) * * * north region designation for issuance as
the collection–of–information. (1) Crab QS is issued by the Regional converted CPO QS.
Public comment is sought regarding Administrator to persons who qualify (B) For Entity C.
whether (1) this proposed collection–of– for an initial allocation under § 680.40 (1) Identify the amount of CVO QS in
information is necessary for the proper or receive QS by transfer under § 680.41. either the BBR or BSS crab QS fishery
performance of the functions of the Once issued, a crab QS permit is valid initially issued to you by NMFS with a
agency, including whether the until modified under paragraphs (b)(2) north region designation for issuance as
information shall have practical utility; or (b)(3) of this section, or by transfer converted CPO QS; and
under § 680.41; or until the permit is (2) Identify the amount of PQS in
the accuracy of the burden estimate; (2)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and revoked, suspended, or modified either the BBR or BSS crab QS fishery
clarity of the information to be pursuant to § 679.43 of this chapter or with a north region designation for
collected; and (3) ways to minimize the under 15 CFR part 904. To qualify for issuance as converted CPO QS.
a crab QS permit, the applicant must be (iii) Affiliate information for Entities
burden of the collection–of–
a U.S. citizen. A and B. (A) For Entities A and B
information, including through the use
described in § 680.40(c)(5)(ii) and
of automated collection techniques or * * * * * (c)(5)(iii), indicate the permanent
other forms of information technology. (3) A converted CPO QS permit is
Send comments on these or any other business mailing address and any
valid until the end of the crab fishing temporary mailing address; business
aspects of the collection–of–information year for which the permit is issued.
to the National Marine Fisheries Service telephone number, facsimile number,
* * * * * and e-mail address of any person who
(see ADDRESSES), and e–mail to (n) Contents of annual application for
DavidlRostker@omb.eop.gov, or fax to is affiliated with you based on
converted CPO QS/IFQ permit. (1)(i) A information provided in an annual
(202) 395–7285. complete application must be received
Notwithstanding any other provision application for IFQ/IPQ that is approved
by NMFS no later than August 1 of the by the Regional Administrator for that
of the law, no person is required to
crab fishing year for which a person or crab fishing year;
respond to, nor shall any person be
crab harvesting cooperative is applying (B) Indicate the amount of PQS in
subject to a penalty for failure to comply
to receive converted CPO QS and the either the BBR or BSS crab QS fishery
with, a collection-of-information subject
IFQ derived from that converted CPO initially issued to that person with a
to the requirements of the PRA, unless
QS. If a complete application is not north region designation for issuance as
that collection of information displays a
received by NMFS by this date, that converted CPO QS.
currently valid OMB Control Number.
person or crab harvesting cooperative (C) Indicate the amount of CVO QS in
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 680 will not receive converted CPO QS and either the BBR or BSS crab QS fishery
Alaska, Fisheries, Recordkeeping and the IFQ derived from that converted with a north region designation held by
reporting requirements. CPO QS for that crab fishing year. that person for issuance as converted
(ii) To receive converted CPO QS/IFQ CPO QS.
Dated: February 11, 2008.
this application must be accompanied (iv) Affiliate information for Entity C.
Samuel D. Rauch III by a timely and complete application for (A) For Entity C described in
Deputy Assistant Administrator for crab IFQ/IPQ described at paragraph (f) § 680.40(c)(5)(iv), indicate the
Regulatory Programs, National Marine of this section or a timely and complete permanent business mailing address
Fisheries Service.
application for a crab harvesting and any temporary mailing address;
For the reasons set out in the cooperative IFQ permit described at business telephone number, facsimile
preamble, 50 CFR part 680 is proposed paragraph (m) of this section. number, and e-mail address of any
to be amended as follows: (2) For the application to be person who is affiliated with you based
PART 680—SHELLFISH FISHERIES OF considered complete, all fees required on information provided in an annual
THE EXCLUSIVE ECONOMIC ZONE by NMFS must be paid, and any EDR application for IFQ/IPQ that is approved
OFF ALASKA required under § 680.6 must be by the Regional Administrator for that
submitted to the DCA. In addition, the crab fishing year;
1. The authority citation for 50 CFR applicant must include the following (B) Indicate the amount of PQS in
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSALS

part 680 is revised to read as follows: information:. either the BBR or BSS crab QS fishery
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1862; Pub. L. 109– (i) Entity identification. Indicate the with a north region designation for
241; Pub. L 109–479. entity (Entity A, B, or C) described in issuance as converted CPO QS.
2. In § 680.2, add the definition of § 680.40(c)(5)(ii) through (c)(5)(iv) for (C) Indicate the amount of CVO QS in
‘‘Converted CPO QS’’ in alphabetical which you are applying to receive either the BBR or BSS crab QS fishery
order to read as follows: converted CPO QS. issued to that person with a north region

VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:07 Feb 14, 2008 Jkt 214001 PO 00000 Frm 00017 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15FEP1.SGM 15FEP1
8842 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 32 / Friday, February 15, 2008 / Proposed Rules

designation for issuance as converted through (c)(5)(iv) of this section one unit must be offloaded in the Bering Sea
CPO QS. of converted CPO for each unit of CVO subarea north of 56°20′ N. lat.
(v) Certification of applicant and QS and 0.9 units of PQS indicated in an * * * * *
affiliates. The applicant and any approved application for converted CPO (e) * * *
persons who are affiliated with the QS/IFQ. (3) PQS issued to Blue Dutch, LLC. (i)
applicant and named on the application (vi) For each crab fishing year, the
Pursuant to Public Law 109–241, NMFS
must sign and date the application Regional Administrator will not issue
issued 3,015,229 units of PQS for the
certifying that all information is true, CPO QS for the BBR or BSS crab QS
BBR crab QS fishery and 7,516,253 units
correct, and complete to the best of his/ fishery:
(A) To Entity A described in of PQS for the BSS crab QS fishery.
her knowledge and belief. If the
paragraph (c)(5)(ii) of this section that is (ii) PQS units issued to Blue Dutch,
application is completed by an
greater than the amount of converted LLC, under paragraph (e)(3)(i) of this
authorized representative, proof of
CPO QS that may be derived from the section were assigned a regional
authorization must accompany the
amount of PQS units with a north region designation according to the procedures
application.
designation initially issued by NMFS to established in paragraph (b)(2)(iv) of
4. In § 680.7, add paragraph (c)(6) to
Yardarm Knot, Inc. (NMFS ID # 675), this section.
read as follows:
and any affiliates of Yardarm Knot Inc. (iii) PQS units issued to Blue Dutch,
§ 680.7 Prohibitions. as listed on an annual application for LLC, under paragraph (e)(3)(i) of this
* * * * * converted CPO QS/IFQ for that crab section may not be transferred to any
(c) * * * fishing year; other person.
(6) For any person who is not an (B) To Entity B described in paragraph * * * * *
entity defined in § 680.40(c)(5)(ii), (c)(5)(iii) of this section that is greater (j) * * *
(c)(5)(iii), or (c)(5)(iv) to: than the amount of converted CPO QS (4) IPQ issued to Blue Dutch, LLC—(i)
(i) Hold converted CPO QS. that may be derived from the amount of BBR IPQ. For each crab fishing year that
(ii) Use the CPO IFQ derived from that PQS units with a north region the total allowable catch for BBR CR
converted CPO QS outside of a crab designation initially issued by NMFS to crab is greater than 15,732,480 lb
harvesting cooperative. Blue Dutch, LLC, (NMFS ID # 3163) (7,136.2 mt), NMFS will issue IPQ for
* * * * * under paragraph (e)(3) of this section the 3,015,229 units of PQS issued to
5. In § 680.40, add paragraphs (c)(5), and any affiliates of Blue Dutch, LLC, as Blue Dutch, LLC, pursuant to Public
(c)(6), (e)(3), and (j)(4) to read as follows: listed on an annual application for Law 109–241.
annual application for converted CPO (ii) BSS PQS. For each crab fishing
§ 680.40 Quota Share (QS), Processor QS QS/IFQ for that crab fishing year; and
(PQS), Individual Fishing Quota (IFQ), and
year that the total allowable catch for
(C) To Entity C described in paragraph BSS CR crab is greater than 21,350,640
Individual Processor Quota (IPQ) issuance. (c)(5)(iv) of this section that is greater lb (9,684.6 mt), NMFS will issue IPQ for
* * * * * than the amount of converted CPO QS the 7,516,253 units of PQS issued to
(c) * * * that may be derived from the amount of Blue Dutch, LLC, pursuant to Public
(5) Issuance of converted CPO QS. (i) CVO QS units with a north region Law 109–241.
For each crab fishing year, the Regional designation initially issued by NMFS to
Administrator may issue converted CPO Trident Seafoods, Inc., (NMFS ID # * * * * *
QS for the BBR or BSS crab QS fishery 8184) and any affiliates of Trident 6. In § 680.41:
with a north region designation to an Seafoods Inc. as listed on an annual a. Paragraphs (c)(1)(iv) through
entity described in paragraphs (c)(5)(ii), application for converted CPO QS/IFQ (c)(1)(vi) are redesignated as paragraphs
(c)(5)(iii), or (c)(5)(iv) of this section if for that crab fishing year; (c)(1)(vi) through (c)(1)(viii),
NMFS has approved an application for (vii) CPO IFQ derived from converted respectively.
converted CPO QS/IFQ for that crab CPO QS may be issued to a crab b. New paragraphs (c)(1)(iv) and
fishing year. harvesting cooperative only if the entity (c)(1)(v) are added.
(ii) Entity A is comprised only of described in paragraph (c)(5)(ii), c. Paragraph (c)(1)(i) is revised.
Yardarm Knot, Inc. (NMFS ID # 675). (c)(5)(iii), or (c)(5)(iv) of this section The additions and revision read as
(iii) Entity B is comprised only of holding the converted CPO QS is a follows:
Blue Dutch, LLC (NMFS ID # 3163). member of that crab harvesting
(iv) Entity C is comprised only of cooperative. § 680.41 Transfer of QS, PQS, IFQ, and
Trident Seafoods, Inc. (NMFS ID # (6) Offloading requirements for CPO IPQ.
8184). IFQ derived from converted CPO QS. * * * * *
(v) NMFS will issue Entity A, B, or C Any crab harvested under a CPO IFQ (c) * * *
described in paragraphs (c)(5)(ii) permit derived from converted CPO QS (1) * * *

Quota type Eligible person Eligibility requirements

(i) PQS not issued under § 680.40(e)(3)(i) Any person None.

* * * * * * *

(iv) Converted CPO QS N/A Converted CPO QS may not be transferred.


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSALS

(v) CPO IFQ derived from Converted CPO QS N/A CPO IFQ derived from Converted CPO may
not be transferred.

* * * * * * *

VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:07 Feb 14, 2008 Jkt 214001 PO 00000 Frm 00018 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15FEP1.SGM 15FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 32 / Friday, February 15, 2008 / Proposed Rules 8843

* * * * * (5) IFQ that is used by a crab or (c)(5)(iv), may not use more than
7. In § 680.42, paragraph (a)(5) is harvesting cooperative is not subject to 1,000,000 lb (453.6 mt) of IFQ derived
revised, and paragraph (a)(7) is added to the use caps in this paragraph (a) except from converted CPO QS in the BBR or
read as follows: as provided for in paragraph (a)(7) of BSS crab QS fisheries.
this section. * * * * *
§ 680.42 Limitations on use of QS, PQS, * * * * *
IFQ, and IPQ. [FR Doc. E8–2895 Filed 2–14–08; 8:45 am]
(7) In a calendar year, an entity as
BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
(a) * * * described in § 680.40(c)(5)(ii), (c)(5)(iii),
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSALS

VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:07 Feb 14, 2008 Jkt 214001 PO 00000 Frm 00019 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15FEP1.SGM 15FEP1

You might also like