Professional Documents
Culture Documents
DEPARTMENT OF
ELECTRICAL & COMPUTER ENGINEERING
EEL 4140
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SAFETY RULES AND OPERATING PROCEDURES
LABORATORY SAFETY INFORMATION
EXPERIMENT # 1
Study Guide A
Study Guide B
EXPERIMENT #2
EXPERIMENT # 3
Sallen-Key Filters
EXPERIMENT # 4
State-Variable Biquads
EXPERIMENT # 5
EXPERIMENT # 6
Study Guide C
EXPERIMENT # 7
Study Guide C
EXPERIMENT # 8
APPENDIX
LIST OF COMPONENTS
RESISTOR COLOR CODE TUTORIAL
ii
I have read and understand these rules and procedures. I agree to abide by these rules and
procedures at all times while using these facilities. I understand that failure to follow these rules
and procedures will result in my immediate dismissal from the laboratory and additional
disciplinary action may be taken.
________________________________________
Signature
Date
________________
Lab #
iii
iv
EEL 4140
ANALOG FILTERS
LABORATORY 1
Objective
To understand the effect of finite gain bandwidth product of practical Op Amps in finite gain
applications, and to study the concept of Composite Op Amps (CNOA).
II. Introduction
The simplified model of a practical Op Amp is shown in Fig.1.
are the input and output resistance, respectively. The open-loop gain AOL ( j ) can be written
as:
AOL ( j ) =
A0
(1)
1+ j
0
Va
+
+
RI
Vb
RO
Vo
o
AOL ( j )[Va Vb ]
AOL ( j )
In this figure,
G A0 0
(2)
AOL ( j ) (dB)
A0 (dB)
0 (dB)
log(G )
log( 0 )
log( )
The positive finite gain amplifier, as shown in Fig. 3, is used to illustrate the bandwidth
shrinkage by the voltage gain K . In this amplifier, the input and output resistances of the Op
Amp are assumed to be infinite and zero, respectively. The transfer function of this amplifier
can be derived as:
T ( j ) =
Vo ( j )
Vi ( j )
A0
A0
1+ j
1+
K
(3)
0 1 +
A0
(4)
T ( j ) K
1+ j
(5)
A0
K
and the cutoff frequency, or 3dB frequency, of this amplifier, is given by:
A0
cutoff = 0
(6)
From Equation (6), it is clear that the cutoff frequency is inversely proportional to the gain
of the amplifier, K . Therefore, the bandwidth of a single Op Amp amplifier realization
shrinks by a factor of
1
K
Vi ( j )
Vo ( j )
R1 = R
R2 = (K 1)R
One method to increase the bandwidth is to use the N-stage amplifier, each stage having the
gain of N K to realize an overall gain K .
by
1
N
1
N
2
1 [1].
1
2 N 1
.
N K
properties, such as stability with one- and two-pole Op Amps model, low sensitivity to
component and Op Amps mismatch, and wide dynamic range.
As shown in References [2, 3] attached, the bandwidth of the amplifier constructed by
CNOA shrinks only by a factor of N
1
K
1
K
for the
2 N 1
N
For
Four different C2OA structures, referred as C2OA-1, C2OA-2, C2OA-3, and C2OA-4, are
found to meet the good performance criteria, and are shown in Fig. 4. Here, is the resistor
ratio. The open-loop gain of the Op Amps used in the modeling of the C2OAs (assuming a
single-pole model) is
Ai ( j ) =
Ao,i 0,i
j + 0,i
i = 1 or 2
(7)
where Ao, i , and 0, i are the DC open-loop gain and the cutoff frequency of the ith Op Amp,
respectively.
The output voltage of the C2OAs is given by:
Vom = Va Aam ( j ) Vb Abm ( j ),
m = 1,2,3,4
(8)
Vo1 = Va
A2 ( j )(1 + A1 ( j ) )(1 + )
A ( j ) A2 ( j )(1 + )
Vb 1
A1 ( j ) + (1 + )
A1 ( j ) + (1 + )
(9)
for C2OA-2
Vo 2 = Va
A1 ( j ) A2 ( j )(1 + )
A ( j ) A2 ( j )(1 + )
Vb 1
A2 ( j ) + (1 + )
A2 ( j ) + (1 + )
(10)
for C2OA-3
Vo 3 = Va
A1 ( j ) A2 ( j )
A ( j )(1 + A1 ( j ) )
Vb 2
(1 + )
(1 + )
(11)
A2 ( j )( A1 ( j ) + )
A ( j )[A1 ( j ) + (1 + )]
Vb 2
(1 + )
(1 + )
C2OA1
b
C2OA2
b
(12)
A1
+
A2
A2
-
A1
(a)
(b)
C2OA3
a
C2OA4
a
R
-
A1
A2
o
R
A1
A2
(c)
(d)
From Equations (9), (10), (11), and (12), the transfer functions of the circuits using C2OAs
can be derived. The applications of the four proposed C2OAs in the positive and negative
finite-gain amplifiers are summarized in Table 1. From this table, it is clear that the 3-dB
1
.
K
That is
1 = 2
(13)
A1 = A2
(14)
and
3.
1+
1+ k
= QP 1 + k 1
= 2.32
4.
5.
(15)
(15)
(16)
R = 23.2k
(17)
III. Design
1.
a. Design a single-stage positive finite gain amplifier with an overall gain of 100 using LM471
Op Amps. Repeat for an overall gain of 25.
b. Design a two-stage positive finite gain amplifier.
overall gain of 100. Use LM471 Op Amps.
c. Design a positive finite gain amplifier using C2OA-1 ( Q p = 0.707 ) with close-loop gain of
100.
c. Design a negative finite gain amplifier by using C2OA-1 ( Q p = 0.707 ) with an overall gain of
100.
Plot the
c. Simulate the positive finite gain amplifier with finite gain of 100 using C2OA-1.
magnitude response. Determine the cutoff frequency.
Plot the
Compare these cutoff frequencies of the three realizations of finite overall gain of 100, and
show the useful bandwidth improvement.
Plot
Compare these cutoff frequencies of the three realizations of finite overall gain of 100, and
comment on the useful bandwidth in each realization.
V. Experiments
This lab is a computer simulation lab. No actual experiment.
References
[1]. J. Millman, and C. Halkias, Integrated Electronics; Analog and Digital Circuits and
Systems, Mcgraw-Hill, Inc. 1972, pp.386
[2]. Wasfy B. Mikhael, and Sherif Mickael, Composite Operational Amplifiers: Generation and
Finite-Gain Applications, IEEE Trans. on Circuits and Systems, Vol. 34, No. 5, pp. 449-460,
May 1987.
[3]. Sherif Mickael, and Wasfy B. Mikhael, Inverting Integrator and Active Filter Applications
of Composite Operational Amplifiers, IEEE Trans. on Circuits and Systems, Vol. 34, No. 5, pp.
461-470, May 1987.
C2OA-1
Ti
1+
1+
2
s
s
+ 2
pQ p p
C2OA-2
Ti
1+
C2OA-3
Ti
1+
C2OA-4
Ti
1+
1+
(1 + )s
Ti
s
s
+
p Q p w 2p
C2OA
s
s
+ 2
pQ p p
s
s
+ 2
pQ p p
1+
Ti
s
s2
+ 2
pQ p p
1+
1
1+
s
s
+ 2
pQ p p
1+
Vo
1 2
1+
1+ k
1+ k
1 2
1+
1+ k
2
1
s
s2
1+
+
p Q p 2p
Ti
1+
Vi
Ti
Vi
s
1
1+ k
1
2
1 2
(1 + k )(1 + )1
1 2
(1 + k )1
(1 + ) 2
(1 + k )(1 + )
(1 + k )(1 + )
2
s
s
+ 2
pQp p
C2OA
Vo
kR
Vo
= k = Ti
Vi
kR
Vo
= (1 + k ) = Ti
Vi
is the ideal
transfer function
Ti
Study Guide A
EEL 4140
IEEE TRANSACTIONS
ON CIRCUITS
AND
SYSTEMS,
VOL.
CAS-34, NO. 5,
MAY
449
1987
Abstract-A
practical and effective general approach is presented for
extending the useful operating frequencies and improving the performance
of linear active networks realized using operational amplifiers (OAs). This
is achieved by replacing each OA in the active network by a composite
operational amplifier (CNOA) constructed using N OAs. The technique
of generating the CNOAs for any given N is proposed. The realizations
employing the CNOA are examined according to a stringent performance
criterion satisfying such important properties as extended bandwidth,
stability with one- and two-pole OA models, low sensitivity to the components and OA mismatch, and wide dynamic range. Several families of
CNOAs, for N = 2, 3, and 4, are shown to satisfy ,the suggested performance criterion. In this contribution, the CNOAs applications in inverting, noninverting, and differential finite-gain amplifiers are given and
shown theoretically and experimentally to compare favorably with the
state-of-the-art realizations using the same number of OAs. Applications
of the CNOA in inverting integrator and active filter realizations are
presented in a companion contribution (321.
I.
INEAR
ACTIVE
INTRODUCTION
circuits,
namely,
positive,
negative,
SHERIF MICHAEL,
:@p;++
,
(4
Fig. 1.
MEMBER, IEEE
~qfjj&!+!F~
1)Nll.fOl
(b)
A--t-m
450
IEEE TRANSACTIONS
ON CIRCUITS
0)
(4
7h
AND
SYSTEMS,
VOL.
(4
(H-I)R
Fig. 2. (a)-(d) Four different networks fbr generating the composite operational amplifiers using two single OAs (C20As).
(e) -H and (f) +H finite-gain amplifier realizations used in Fig. 4(a)-(d). (g) The composite operational amplifier
(C20A-i) symbol.
II.
GENERATION OF COMPOSITEOPERATIONAL
AMPLIFIERS (CNOAs) USING N SINGLE OAs
[:]=[: :I*[-q.
(1)
MIKHAEL
AND
MICHAEL:
COMPOSITE
OPERATIONAL
I//
.Fig. 3.
451
AMPLIFIERS
(4
i
/
I/
(4
The composite operational amplifiers (C20As). (a) C20A-1. (b) C20A-2. (c) C20A-3. (d) C20A-4
AoitiLi
wi
WLi+S
i=lor2
s + WLi
(4
where Aoi, wLi and wi are the dc open-loop gain, the 3-dB
bandwidth, and the GBWP of the ith single OA, respectively.
It can be easily shown that the open-loop input-output
relationships for the C20A-1 to C20A-4 are given by
(i=l..-4)
V,,= K,Aai(s)-GAbi
where for C20A-1
v
=
01
Ad+
a
Ad(l+
A,+(l+a)
a)
A,A,(l+
bAI+(l+ci)
a)
(3)
for C20A-2
+a>_v AAl +4
Yd=v,AAl
A,+(l+a)
bA2+(1+a)
(4
452
IEEE TRANSACTIONS
ON CIRCUITS
a
I.
I
I
cl&
I
I
Fig. 4.
VOL.
CAS-34,
NO.
5,
MAY
1987
C30Ab
a-
\
\
-\
.
\
4(4+d
(l+a)
-v A,[A,+(l+a)l
b
(1+4
(6)
(7b)
SYSTEMS.
The composite operational amplifiers (C30As). (a) C3OA-1. (b) C30A-2. (c) C30A-3. (d) C30A-4. (e) C30A-5. (f)
C30A-6.
for C20A-3
T/od=K
AND
A&+a> = A,(1 + a)
Ocl= 1+ (1 -I-a)/A,
(74
MIKHAEL
MICHAEL:
COMPOSITE
OPERATIONAL
453
AMPLIFIERS
Fig. 5. The composite operational amplifiers (C40As). (a) C40A-1. (b) C40A-2. (c) C40A-3.
(4
C40A-4
(e) C40A-5.
IEEE TRANSACTIONS
454
ON CIRCUITS
AND
SYSTEMS,
VOL.
CAS-34,
NO. 5, MAY
1987
TABLE
NEGATIVE
CZOA-i
Negative
Finite
Gain Trans.
(1.3)
AND
POSITIVE
Function
I
GAINS
FINITE
Positive
Finite
1
C20A-1
Ti
+ (S%;)
Function
wP
QP
WlW2
1 + (S/upQ;)
+ (S%;)
I- l+k
1 + WwpQp) + (S'/$)
F l+k
T,
1 + (S/opQp)
Ti
+ (S*/$)
Ti
+ (S*/w;)
w2
i- WI
(14
-f-K
l- wy
WI
yyaz
(l+Ww1)
Ti
1 + (S/wPQP) + (S%;)
ji$$
1 + (VwPQP) + (S'/$)
vow
igz
*va
kR
kR
!!.c=
vi
f--x-&
(W
fl+k
1 + (S/wpQp) + (S%;)
Cl+(l+~wwl
Ti
w1w.T
(l+S/u)
Ti
1 + (ShPQP)
C20A-4
Gain Trans.
(Ta)
THE C20As
(1Ww)
CZOA-3
v] USING
T,
1 + (ShPQP)
C20A-2
V,/
F=
1
- k=Ti
(ltk)
= Ti
Ti(idea1
Transfer
Function)
III.
REALIZATION
OF POSITIVE, NEGATIVE,
DIFFERENTIAL
FINITE-GAIN
LR
AND
AMPLIFIERS
V2
1
where
q1 = x(1 + k)/(l+
q2=-k
Qp=
020+
(8)
x)
k)
Application
N=l+a~=l+~
(1+ Lx).
w1
J
1 + s/oPQP + s ,a, v,
T2
Fig. 6.
finite-gain ampli-
1
1 + s/wPQP + s /o, I v,
+
VI
(9)
D=1+b,s+b2s2=1+(s/WpQp)+(s2/~;).
Thus, N/D indicates the amplitude and phasedeviation of
T, from q. Also, b, and b, determine the stability of T,,
while a, b,, and b,, and consequently oZ, wP,and QP, are
functions of the circuit parameters or, w2, and (Y.None of
the a and b coefficients is realized through differences,
which guaranteesthe low sensitivity of T,, o,, o,,, and Q.P
to the circuit parameters.On the other hand, the b coefficients are always positive (assuming a single-pole ,OA
model), which is necessaryfor the stability of the transfer
function. From Table I, a mismatch of k 5 percent in w1
and w2 results in a +Spercent change in wP and a
*2.5-percent change in QP. Hence, single OAs with mismatched gain-bandwidth products within practical ranges
can be used without appreciably affecting the stability or
the sensitivity of the finite-gain realizations.
455
TABLE II
VALUESOF~
FORMAXIMALLYFLATANDFOR
Q,, =l
C20As ANDTHE
FINITE-GAINREALIZATIO~S~SING
CORRESPONDINGBANDWIDTHAND
STABILITYCONDITIONS
dBb
1
CZOA-i
1%
c2oA-1
PP
Stability
Condition
for (I used
-OF!
Satisfied
-2
fm
Satisfied
(ind$ment
C20A-I
32 -
1 C20A-3
1 OPmin = m(.
&
I
(l+k)
Unsatisfied
30
30
(4
I
Unsatisfied
m
C20A-4
-10
1
2(l+k)
-zI
IO 20
Proposed design
Unsatisfied
-20
&-(ltk)
I
-30
I
-40
-50
1987
456
20 LOG
Vo/Vi
k
I
+2
dB
0
= 0.707
5 %
5 %
--_
-6-
-6 I
.f
20
a=
-10
20
40
80
60
100
30
40
50
120
140
160
180
200
220
c ,f
LOG
70
80
90
100
II0
120
130
kHz
IhO
kHr
(4
20
60
(b)
Vo/Vin
k
I
dB
20LOG
I
k
b/Vi
k
Qp = 0.707
d0
100
k
a
= 100
=6
-4-
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
so
100
(4
(4
Fig. 8. Experimental results using C2OA-1 in negative gain applications. (a) (Qp = 0.707) Maximally flat closed-loop
gain = - 25, - 50, - 100 (LM747 OP AMPS). (b) Effect of compensation resistor-ratio variation by T 5 percent (LM747 OP
AMPS). (c) Effect of active compensation on extending the bandwidth (LM747 OP AMPS). (d) Effect of power supply
variation from T 9 V to T 15 V on the closed-loop gain for k = 100 (LM 747 OP AMPS).
MIKHAEL
AND
MICHAEL:
COMPOSITE
OPERATIONAL
457
AMPLIFIERS
TABLE III
NEGATIVE
C30A-i
Finite
Gain Transfer
C30A-1
1 t (1%)
POSITWE
FINITE
GAINS
V,/ y
USING
THE C30As
Function
-k(l+
kc
"i
AND
i3;-)
$+
Negative Finite
Gain Trans. Func.
(E)
&+
(l+k)
s-+-,
52 L
&
(l+k)>a(lw)
""i
V
.o _
q C30A-2
!!L
"i
(ltk)(l+
l+(l+#
'
T+a
TlFi w,w:,
++
($1
St
(l+k)
?-
4 w2w3
Neqative Finite
Gain Trans. Func.
- K (W./w,)
,+ CL+
w*
l+k
ol(l+B)
1 s+ f&g+
(l+kJ$g
(l'tk)>
1+ [+
+ s
1 S + #$
&
+ (I+@&
9
Negative Finite
Gain Trans. Func.
-K
l+(-$)$+(&&+(l+U&
C30A-3
(l+k)>(l+a)(l+B)
L
V
o=
"i
(l+K)(
l+(s)+
1 + &
g+
+ ( -$
&
L
)$q+
Positive
Finite
/ Gain Trans. Func.
J
W+&-
-K
C30A-4
l+k
+(K)w
a(l+B)
Positive
Finite
Gain Trans. Func.
(l+K)(l+S/w2)
AZ=
"i
Positive
Finite
Gain Trans. Func.
'1 Neaative
Finite1
Gain Trans. Func
5
SL + (l+k+-19
w1w2w3
1 (l+k)>(l+a)(l+6)
Positive
Finite
Gain Trans. Func.
I,
Negative Finite
Gain Configuration
458
IEEETRANSACTIONS
ON CIRCUITS
Ah-SYSTEMS,
VOL.
- 14i.6
40.09
aI0
dB
3i.81
a=
1.8
p=
I2
k=
100
- 71.8
0.0
i3.54
(I i
- 71.8
i0.26
26.99
:l43.6
23.71
-215.0
32.73
30.29
27
0
60
160
240
( MAXIMALLY
FLAT
320
400
P = 2
v = 3.9
k = 100
.85
kHz
200
f kHr
300
MAXIMALLY
FLAT
(4
(a)
143.6
, dB
37.20
-1
36.11
(3 = Il.8
k
34.27
9
71.8
= 2.6
31.35
34.16
32.21
i = 3.9
k = 100
-71.8
143.0
28.43
?I5 .o
25.50
0
60
160
240
320
(CHEBYCAEV)
@I
:.
a-2
p=3
= 100
(single
OA
GBWP
(CHEBYCHEV)
(b)
= 1 MHz).
This is satisfied by a wide ,margin in. the ,.C30A-1 responses in Fig. 11(a) and (b),for both the maximally flat
response and the Chebyshev,response.,All of: these finitegain designs have the same attractive dynamic-range, stability, and low-sensitivity properties as the C20A designs
in Section III-A. Also, it is interesting to note that some of
the finite-gain designs presented here (C30A-2, C30A-4,
C40A-2, C40A-3, and C40A-5) have identical N/D multiplying factors in the positive and negative gain applications, which makes them suitable in differential gain applications.
2) Experimental Results Using C3OAs and ,C4OAs in
Finite-Gain Applications: Only sample experimental results
using the C30A-1 and C40A-1 are given to illustrate the
performance. Exhaustive test results are documented in
[33]. Fig. 12 gives the experimental results using the
C30A-1 in positive finite-gain applications of 38.7. The
computer frequency responseplots of the C40A-1 negative finite-gain realization in Fig. 10 closely agreewith the
experimental results of Fig. 13.
The stability and low sensitivity to power supply as well
as to the active compensation resistor variations were
verified [33].
IV. CONCLUSIONS
A new approach is presented for extend& the useful
operating frequency range in a wide variety *oflinear active
networks which utilize OAs. The extended SW is.achieved
by replacing each of the single OAs in theactive realization by a composite OA (CNOA). The application of the
CNOAs in finite-gain amplifiers is also given.
A systematic procedureis given for the generation of the
CNOAs. Each CNOA is constructed using. N-single OAs
and 2(N - 1) active compensating low-spread and lowaccuracy resistors, resulting in (N - 1) resistor ratios. The
CNOA is versatile since it has three external terminals that
correspond to those of a single OA. The suggestedgeneration method gives rise to a large number of QJOAs for a
given N. For N = 2, 3, and 4, CNOAs%aregeneratedand
examined according to a stringent perfor.mancecriterion
that considers stability, sensitivity, dynar$ range,:CMRR,
BW, and the GBWP mismatch effect of single OAs.
Several of the CNOAs, namely the C2OA:J, to C20A-4,
C30A-1 to C30A-6, and C40A-1 to C40A-5, .meet the
performance criterion and have been found to be very
useful in practice. In these CNOAs, simple resistor ratios
can be used advantaeeouslvto reduce the deviatidh of the
MIKHAEL
AND
MICHAEL:
COMPOSITE
OPERATIONAL
459
AMPLIFIERS
-vo/
20 Log
f kHz
200
300
50
60
70
00
90
f KHz
m
300
400
(b)
Fig. 11. Theoretical results for C30A-5, C40A-5, and [lo] for positive
finite-gain applications (gain k = 38.7). 0:
[lo] r =l.l,
/3 =10m8
(stable with min. margin); 0 : [lo] r = 2, B = 0.2 (unstable): @ :
C30A-5 (Y=1.9, p = 5.4; @ : C30A-5 OL=i, p = 6.4; @ : C40A-5
OL= 0.6, p = 2.4, y = 12.5; @ : cascade of three single-OA finite-gain
stages, each of gain (38.7)1/3; 0 : c ascade of four single-OA finite-gain
stages, each of gain (38.7)i4. (a) Theoretical amplitude responses of
C30A-5, C40A-5, and [lo] for positive finite-gain applications. (b)
Theoretrcal phase responses of C30A-5, C40A-5, and [lo] in positive
finite-gain applications.
33.7.
27.7.
100
e
200
-4
-6
-3 dB
__-------.-----.
f kHz
300
Fig. 12. Experimental results of C30A-1 in positive finite-gain application, for a gain of 38.7, and the effect of variation of the compensating
resistor ratios a and j3 (LM747 OP AMPS).
-_-
-IO,
Fig. 13.
30
40
d0
-2
(experimental)
50
IO
20
200
4
-
400
(4
100
d0
+2
vi
k
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
f kHz
e
500
460
IEEE TRANSACTIONS
REFERENCES
PI A. M. Soliman, Instrumentation amplifiers with improved bandwidth, IEEE Circuits Syst. Magazine, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 7-9, 1981.
M. A. Reddy, R. Ravishankar, B. Ramamurthy, and K. R. Rao, A
PI
high-quality
double-integrator
building-block
for active-ladder
filters, IEEE Trans. Circuits Sysr., vol. CAS-28, pp. 1174-1177,
Dec. 1981.
[31 A. Budak, G. Wullink, and R. L. Geiger, Active filters with zero
transfer function sensitivity with respect to the time constant of
operational amplifiers, IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst., vol. CAS-27,
pp. 849-854, Oct. 1980.
141 B. B. Bhattacharyya, W. B. Mikhael, and A. Antoniou, Design of
RC-active networks by using generalized immittance converters, in
Proc. IEEE Int. Symp. Circuit Theory, Apr. 1973, pp. 290-294.
[51 K. R. Rao, M. A. Reddy, S. Ravichandran, B. Ramamurthy, and
R. R. Sankar, An active-compensated double-integrator filter
without matched operational amplifiers, IEEE Proc., vol. 68, pp.
534-538, Apr. 1980.
[61 A. M. Soliman, A eneralized active compensated noninverting
VCVS with reduced pfl ase error and wide bandwidth, IEEE Proc.,
vol. 67, pp. 963-965, June 1979.
171 S. Natarajan and B. B. Bhattacharyya, Design and some applications of extended bandwidth finite gain amplifiers, J. Frank/in
Inrt., vol. 305, no. 6, pp. 320-341, June 1978.
PI R. L. Geiger and A. Budak, Active filters with zero amplifier
sensitivity, IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst., vol. CAS-26, pp. 277-288,
Apr. 1979.
191 A. M. Soliman and M. Ismail, Active compensation of op-amps,
IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst., vol. CAS-26, pp. 112-117, Feb. 1979.
UOI R. L. Geiger and A. Budak, Design of active filters independent of
first- and second-order operational amplifier time constant effects,
IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst,, vol. CAS-28, pp. 749-757, Aug. 1981.
WI A. M. Soliman, Classification and generation of active compensated non-inverting VCVS building blocks, Znt. J. Circuit
Theory and Ap lications, vol. 8, pp. 395-405, 1980.
WI G. Wilson, 4 ompensation of some operational-amplifier based
RC-active networks, IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst., vol. CAS-23, pp.
443-446, July 1976.
voltage amplifier,
1131 A. Nedungadi, A simple inverting-noninverting
IEEE Proc., vol. 68, pp. 414-415, Mar. 1980.
u41 R. Nandi and A. K. Bandyopadhyay, A high-input impedance
inverting/noninverting
active gain block, IEEE Proc., vol. 67, pp.
690-691, Apr. 1979.
P51 A. Sedra and P. Brackett, Filter Theory and Design: Active and
Passive. Beaverton, OR: Matrix, 1978.
WI M. Ghausi and K. Laker, Modern Filter Design Active-RC and
Switched Ca acitor. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1981.
u71 W. B. Mi ki ael and S. Michael, Active filter design for high
frequency operation, in Midwest Symp. Circuits Syst. (Albuquerque, NM), June 1981, pp. 573-576.
WI W. B. Mikhael and S. Michael, A systematic general approach for
the generation of composite OAs with some useful applications in
linear active networks, in Proc. 25th Midwest Symp. Circuits Syst.,
(Houghton, MI), Aug. 1982, pp. 454-463.
P91 W. B. Mikhael and S. Michael, Generation of actively compensated operational amplifiers and their use in extending the
operating frequencies of linear active networks, in IEEE Znt.
Symp. Circuits Syst. (Newport Beach, CA), May 1983, pp.
1290-1293.
WI S. Michael and W. B. Mikhael, High frequency filtering and
inductance simulation using new composite generalized immittance
converters, in IEEE Inf. Symp. Circuits Syst. (Kyoto, Japan), June
1985, pp. 299-300.
1211 R. Schaumann, Two-amplifier active-RC biquads with minimized
dependence on op-amp parameters, IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst.,
vol. CAS-30, pp. 797-803, Nov. 1983.
P21 W. F. Stephenson, Composite amplifier structures for use in active
RC biquads, IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst., vol. CAS-31, pp. 420-423,
Apr. 1984.
1231 T. Fleming, Monolithic sample/hold combines speed and precision, Harris Application Note #538, Jan. 1983.
1241 M. Ismail, S. R. Zarabadi, and G. Myers, Application of composite op-amps in nonlinear circuits, in 27th Midwest Symp.
Circuits Syst. (Morgantown, WV), June 1984, pp. 44-47.
1251 S. Michael and W. B. Mikhael, High-speed high-accuracy integrated operational amplifiers, in 27th Midwesf Symp. Circuits
Syst. (Morgantown, WV), June 1984, pp. 792-795.
WI CLC103, Fast settling wideband operational amplifiers, Comlinear Corp., Loveland,, CO, Nov. 1984.
1271 A. Antomou, Realization of gyrators using operational amplifiers,
and their use in RC-active-network synthesis, IEEE Proc., vol.
116, pp. 1838-1850, Nov. 1969.
P81 A. C. Davies, The significance of nullators, norators and nullors
in active-network theory, Radio Electron. Eng., vol. 34, pp.
259-267. 1967.
ON CIRCUITS
AND
SYSTEMS,VOL.
CAS-34,N0.
5,MAY
1987
Study Guide B
EEL 4140
461
I. INTRODUCTION
N RECENT YEARS, a great deal of attention has been
directed toward designing high-performance integrators
and active RC filters. Severalcontributions using a variety
of techniques have been reported to extend the useful.
operating frequency range of thesenetworks and to reduce
their sensitivities with respect to the active elements,
namely, the operational amplifiers (OAs) [3]-[24]. It is
well known that the poles and zeros actually realized are
displaced from their nominal positions because of the
frequency-dependent characteristics of the operational
amplifier gains. This results in both phase and magnitude
errors in the response,especially if the active networks are
designed to operate at high frequencies and/or with high
Q s.
In [l], the authors propose a technique for extending the
operating frequency range of linear active networks by
using composite OAs. A general procedure is described
where N OAs are combined to form a new active device
that resembles externally an OA and is referred to as a
composite operational amplifier CNOA. The technique
generatesa very large number of CNOAs for a given N.
The effect of using suitable CNOAs as one-to-onereplacements of the single OAs in finite-gain realizations is found
to result in an extended operating frequency range relative
to that of existing realizations that use a similar number of
OAS.
WASFY B. MIKHAEL,
FELLOW, IEEE
462
TABLE I
INVERTINGINTEGRATORSV,/ I: USINGTHE C20As
Actual
CZOA-i
CZOA-1
Negative
Integrator
1
T. . c
1
l+S/wpQp+wwpZ
&
Transfer
I*
Function
(T,)
'W,(l+a)
l+T,UJ,(l+al
C20A-2
CZOA-3
Ti
* [
CZOA-4
Ti
. '1
+ S/wpQp
Function
Ti
1 + (,+a)
I--
s/w,
YW2
-lx
+ SLl~p~l
v
Ideal
(Where
Transfer
Tt
is
the
integrator
= F=
i
time
= &,
constant
= RC
= 11 wt
)
"i
I
i
i/ ,. _
Fig. 1.
463
TABLE11
VALUESOF~EC~OA'~RESISTORCOMPENSA~ONRATIO &FOR
SELECTEDVALUESOFQ ,ANDT~CORRESPONDINGSTABXLITY
CONDITIONSFORTHE PNVERTINGINTEGRATOFSUSINGTHE
CZOA-i
II.
APPLICATIONOFTHEPROPOSEDCNOA'SIN
INVERTING INTEGRATORS
A. Inverthg
The amplifiers C20A-1 through C2OA-4 were previously proposed by, the authors and are repeated in Fig. 1
for convenience.The actually realized transfer functions T,
using the C2OA-1 to C20A-4 in inverting integrator applications, assuming a single-pole OA model, are given in
Table I. The Tas have the samegeneralform found in [l]:
ity
for
(I used
0
CZOA-1
Unrealizable
0
CZOA-2
Unrealizable
z?
CZOA-3
Thus, N/D determines the amplitude and phase deviation of T, from T.. Also, b, and b, determine the stability
of T,. Here, a, b,, and b, and consequently wZ, wp, and
Qp (as defined in Table I) are functions of the circuit
parameters which are the single-OA GBWPs ot, 02, and
the C20A compensation ratio (Y(as well as TV,the integrator time constant). None of the a and b coefficients are
realized through differences, thus guaranteeing the low
sensitivity of T,, wZ, (jp, and Qp with respect to the circuit
parameters. On the other hand, the b coefficients are
always positive (assuming a single-pole OA model), which
x guaranteesthe stability of the transfer function.
Now let us assumea two-pole open-loop gain Ai of the
ith single OA (i = 1,2). l/Ai is given by
where
oL, 3-dB bandwidth 2 wi/A,,,
oi gain-bandwidth product (GBWP) of the single-pole
model of the ith OA,
Aoi dc gain of the ith OA,
w,,, second pole frequency (w,, Z+ wL,).
It is easyto show [l, ref. [33]] that, for identical single-OA
models (wh, = o,, = oh and oi= w2= wi), the necessary
and sufficient stability conditions (the parasitic poles are
in the left half of the s plane) for the C20A-1 and
C20A-2 integrator realizations are given by
1
A
Unrealizable
=- 1
A
3w.
= wj
= qfi
Wh '
Wh >
3"'
I 0.666
It is clear from (3), (4), and (5) that, for a given (Y,there
is a minimum value of wh/oi which satisfies the stability
condition. In C20A-1 and C20A-2 integrators, the condition a = 0 results in the minimum value for wh, since wh
increases as (Yincreases.The C20A-2 integrator requires
wh/wi to be greater than 3/2 for stable operation when (Y
equals zero and wh/wi to be greater than 2 when a tends
toward infinity. The C20A-4 integrator has an advantage,
since for wh = oi, a value of OLexists (a = l/3) for which
the integrator is stable with excellent frequency response.
In general, as wh increases,the stability improves. From
physical considerations, if o,, -+ cc, all the integrators become stable, as can be seen from Table I, since the
two-pole OA model reducesto a single-pole model (Ai =
w/(si + oL )). The stability conditions for particular values
of (Y are summarized in Table II. From graphical data
sheets of internally compensatedOAs such as741s and
747s, w,, is seen to slightly exceed wi [2]. This results in
stable realizations down to 0-dB closed-loop gain. For
464
% deviation
from ideal
IHI
6%
CBOA-4
7%
6%
5%
4 %
3 %
2 %
I %
% deviofion
from ideal
integrator
circuit
transfer functions.
Using the C30A-2,
T,=q.
yields
the following
integrator
04
Fig. 2. Comparison of the C20A-4 negative integrator for (Q, =
0.707, Qp = 0.835) with existing negative integrators proposed in [3]-[5].
(a) Percentaee deviation from ideal of the transfer function magnitude
versus no&lized
frequency
for the proposed C20A-4
i&g&r
and
several other integrators (l/r,w, = 0.05). (b) Percentage deviation from
ideal of the transfer function phase versus normalized frequency for the
proposed C20A-4 integrator and several other integrators (l/r,wi = 0.05).
(6)
T,=T.
(7)
T, = q.
(8)
465
+[;][1+,(1;.)]>l. tsa)
For the C30A-5 integrator,
[ l+;f+)][(~+@+~+;(l+P)]>l.
from
ideal
(9b)
(1+0)(1+~)
51.
I
It can be easily shown that these new integrators can be
designed to satisfy the above stability conditions, while
allowing a wide range of (Yand p variations. For illustration, Fig. 3(b) and (c) shows sample theoretical results
using the C30A-6 and those obtained using the integrator
in [3] that employs two OAs. The performance improvement in both magnitude and phaseis obvious.
4%
3 %
2%
I %
f ktiz
20
40
60
80
100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280
III.
(b)
5 %
4 % .
20
40
60
f kHz
(4
Fig. 3. Comparison of C30A-6 negative integrator and the one proposed in [3] (0,/w, = 0.1). (a) The composite operational amplifiers
C30A-2, C30A-5, and C30A-6 [l]. (b) Percentage deviation from ideal
of the transfer function magnitude versus normalized frequency for the
proposed C30A-6 negative integrator and the one proposed in [3]
(o,/w, = 0.1). (c) Percentage deviation from ideal of the transfer function phase versus normalized frequency for the proposed C30A-6
negative integrator and the one proposed in [3] (at/w, = 0.1).
466
(10)
01)
where j=l,2;..,
n. Here, f (.) and g( .) denote functional dependence. For simplicity, let n = 1 and N = 2.
The following argument can be shown to be valid for any
integer values of n and N. Also, let G, = G and Gii = Gi.
The Taylors seriesexpansion of T, about Gi is given by
(G- Gi)
Tl=%=a,+ dG G=C,
1 aT,
-.
(G-GJ*+
(12)
;
i
= TAG
T(AG)2+
...
(13)
where
AT=T,-T.
and AG=G-Gi.
In this subsection, it is shown how the operating frequencies of the first category of filters can be extended
through the use of the functional building blocks that are
presented in [l] and in Section II. These blocks allow the
minimization of AG and the necessary tradeoff between
gain and phase deviations to achievestable high-frequency
operation with low sensitivity to the active compensation
elements. As mentioned above, several techniques are possible for error minimization and bandwidth extension in
this category of filters. A less global and more straightforward approach is employed in this subsection for demonstrating where the bandwidth of each block is individually
extended.
467
Cl
CP
350.
300
CZOA-2)
250
C20Adrl
200.
150.
(4
I oo50
-%
100
')Pf
/
Lop;
SINGLE OA
30
SlNGLE OA
30
2s
20
15
I oo-
IO
50.
OQf
20
40
60
80
(4
100
120
(4
Fig. 4. Experimental results of the two-integrator-loop BP filter using the proposed C20A-2 and C20A-4 and the theoretical
using CZOA-2 and C20A-4. (b) Percentage
results obtainable with regular OAs. (a) Bandpass filter (two-integrator-loop)
variation of Qp, (filter) as a function of Q for bandpass filter (wpf = 50 krad/s). (LM747 OP AMP). (c) Percentage
variation of Qp/ as a function of Qp, for bandpass filter (o , = 30.8 krad/s) (LM747 OP AMP). (d) Percentage variation of
Qp, as a function of fp, for bandpass filter (LM747 OP ARIP).
A biquadratic active filter, which uses the functional where QPr is the complex pole-pair selectivity factor, and
building blocks, is designed and tested. The filter that is
chosen is the well-known state-variable filter [lo], and is
(18)
shown in Fig. 4(a). It usestwo inverting integrators and a
differential finite-gain amplifier, which are constructed
using the C20A-4 integrators proposed in Section II and From [l], for maximally flat response(Q, = l/a)
of the
the C20A-2 differential amplifier [l]. The biquads trans- differential amplifier, 1y= 9
- 1 = 0, independent of
fer function 7;(s) (at the bandpassoutput) is given by
X and QP,. Also, from Sect& II and Table II, a! is set
l+R,/R,_. _
s
equal to unity (maximally flat) in the C20A-4s integra.tors. In Fig. 4(b)-(d), the experimental results for the filter
1+&/R,
W,
using
the C20As are compared to those utilizing the
WhP
=
RJR,
' (16)
7 - s l+R,/R,
r&I
I
single OAs. In addition to the appreciableimprovement in
R,C, l+R,/R,
' R,R,C,C,!
the useful operating frequency range demonstratedin Fig.
4(b)-(d), excellent theoretical sensitivity, stability, and dyThe elements are chosen as
namic range are also verified experimentally. Total
harmonic distortion (THD) of much less than 1 percent at
C,=C,=C
R,=R,=R,=R,=R,=R
any of the filter outputs is measuredover a wide range of
and aPr (the complex pole-pair resonant frequency) = frequencies and signal levels; e.g., the THD was found to
1/RC.
be less than 50 dB below the fundamental at fPf, for an
Referring to [lo], thesedesign values correspond to
output voltage swing of 12 V peak to peak, where
v-power supply =-- 12 V, r,f = 16 kHz, and QP, =-IO. It is very
interesting
to note that when (Yis set to zero (which results
X=2Q*,-1+4
(17) in a previously
reported integrator [3], [ll], [12]), the filter
3
&=l.
.J
468
0 "0
the jth
CNOA.
t,
For simplicity,
let
simplicity,
identical
frequency-dependent
OAs and R X-
~ii = 7i, and 721= r2. R,, the actually realized transfer function T, is given by
t,
Hence,
T,=f(t)
(21)
T,s
{l+s[zCR,+~
( -sCR3H(1+;}/
and
t = &I,
72).
(22)
+wi(l+P)
f)Jgq=o*(,+
*-..
(23)
t=O *t+Yi
=Tt+
;
i
Also,
at,2
zy(t)+
.(t)2+
...
(24)
+S4
t-o
**-.
(25)
is given by
t=-
at
aT1
T1+ 71 - 7* = 0
at
Jr2
(2CR, + CR,)
72 +
7, = T2= 0
(26)
CR,R,
2 CR1
<+ -+
A
o;.(l+P)
0,
C2R,R3
w?(1+ a)
1
f&l + a)
0,(1+/3) +
1 a2T,
at
+s2
C2R,R,
1[
wi
w;(l+ a)
+-
w; I
+
(28)
469
dB
46
W[101.
QPpxpsrimsntol
= 9.7
fptexperimental
= 37.2
fpfhHz
c
1
42
46
(+$dooI
%
10 _
C3OAl
9-
II31
a=o,p=m
9=
0.2, P =
87.
6J4.
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
90
90
100
(a>
AAx
I
100
QPf
fp, kH*
IO
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
-%-
(b)
Fig. 7. Experimental results of the MFB filter designed using the proposed C30A-1 and the design proposed in [13]. (a) Percentage variatrons in center frequency of the MFB filter for Q,,/ = 5, 10, 20. (b)
Percentage variations in Q,,f for Q,,, 7 5, 10, 20. * Trapezoidal oscillations were encountered. ---Limiting diodes were necessary.
470
[26]
[27]
A. Antoniou, Stability properties of some gyrator circuits, Electron. Left., vol. 4, pp. 510-512, 1968.
W. B. Mikhael and B. B. Bhattacharyya, Stability properties of
some RC-active realizations, Electron. Let?., vol. 8, no. 11, pp.
288-289, June 1972.
REFERENCES
EEL 4140
ANALOG FILTERS
LABORATORY 2
Real Zero and Pole Synthesis
I.
Objective
To study real zero and pole synthesis, and cascade design of first-order circuits.
II. Introduction
The general form of the transfer functions can be written as the ratio of two polynomials as
follows:
a s m + am 1s m 1 + ... + a1s + a0
T (s ) = m
s n + bn 1s n 1 + ... + b1s + b0
(1)
where the numerator coefficients a0 , a1 ,..., a m and denominator coefficients b0 , b1 ,..., bn 1 are
real numbers, and n is the order of the filter.
The degree of the numerator polynomial must be less than or equal that of the denominator
polynomial for causality reasons. That is
mn
(2)
The numerator and denominator polynomials can be factored, and T (s ) can be expressed
as:
a (s z1 )(s z 2 )...(s z m )
T (s ) = m
(s p1 )(s p2 )...(s pn )
(3)
where the zeros, z1 , z 2 ,..., z m , and the poles, p1, p2 ,..., pn , can be either real number or
complex number.
Complex zeros and poles, however, must occur in conjugate pairs. In this experiment, only
real zeros and poles are discussed. In this case, the transfer function T (s ) is factored as:
T (s ) = T1 (s )T2 (s )...Tn (s )
(4)
Once the transfer function is factored into multiple stages, the task is to synthesize each stage
using first-order circuits.
Third, we connect
these circuits in the sense that each successive circuit does not load the previous circuit.
In this
T (s) =
(s + 5 10 )(s + 10 )
(s + 2 10 )(s + 10 )
3
(5)
T1 ( s ) =
(s + 5 10 )
(s + 2 10 )
(6)
(s + 10 )
(s + 10 )
(7)
and
T2 ( s ) =
Tcir ( s ) =
R2 ( sC1 R1 + 1)
R1 ( sC2 R2 + 1)
C ( s + 1 ( C1 R1 ) )
= 1
C2 ( s + 1 ( C2 R2 ) )
3. Synthesize the transfer functions T1 ( s ) and T2 ( s ) .
(8)
(9)
In the first circuit, which synthesizes T1 ( s ) , the resistor values are computed as:
R1,1 = 20k
(10)
R2,1 = 50k
(11)
and
In the second circuit, which synthesizing T2 ( s ) , the resistor values are computed as:
R1, 2 = 10k
and
(12)
R2, 2 = 1k
(13)
the first-order circuit is just the output of Op Amps, the output resistance of the first-order
circuit can be considered as zero. Thus, these two circuits can be connected directly, as
shown in Fig. 2.
Vi (s)
C1
C2
R1
R2
Vo (s )
C2,1 = 0.01uF
C1,1 = 0.01uF
Vi (s )
R2,1 = 50k
R1,1 = 20k
C2, 2 = 0.01uF
C1, 2 = 0.01uF
R1, 2 = 10k
R2, 2 = 1k
Fig.2 The cascading design example, which synthesizes real poles and zeros.
(
)( )
(s + 2 10 )(s + 10 )
3
4
function is T ( s ) = s + 5 10 s + 10
3
5
Vo (s )
III. Design
The transfer function of the band-pass filter is given by:
(s + 10 )(s + 2 10 )
T (s ) =
(s + 2 10 )(s + 10 )
3
(14)
Decompose the transfer function in the factor format. Synthesize real zeros and poles
using the circuit shown as in Fig.1. Follow the above procedure, and compute the resistance
and capacitance values.
V. Experiments
1. Build this band-pass filter using two first-order circuits.
power supply voltage of 15V.
2. Measure the magnitude response of each first-order circuit in the frequency range from 30Hz
to 40kHz.
3. Measure the magnitude responses of the overall circuit in the frequency range from 30Hz to
40kHz.
References
[1]. M. E. Van Valkenburg, Analog Filter Design, Oxford University Press, 1982.
[2]. Dr. Robert Janes Martin, EEL 4140: Lab Manual for the Design of Analog Filters,
University of Central Florida, 1997.
EEL 4140
ANALOG FILTERS
LABORATORY 3
Sallen-Key Filters
I.
Objective
To study design and implementation of Sallen-Key filters.
II. Introduction
The term biquad is an edited form of the word biquadratic, which means the ratio of two
quadratic polynomials. Thomas C. Lee named this title several decades ago, and it is now in
common usage. All realizable polynomials used in analog filters can be factored to second
order forms and generally are of quadratic nature. Thus, the biquad is a useful and universal
building block. There are several circuits that can implement the biquad transfer functions.
Sallen-Key circuit is one of these circuits.
Sallen-Key Filters
Sallen and Key proposed a class of circuits, named as Sallen-Key filters, in 1955. The
basic Sallen-Key structure is shown in Fig. 1. This circuit incorporates a single amplifier
embedded in a passive RC network to generate any type of second-order transfer functions:
low-pass, high-pass, band-pass, and notch. In Fig.1, the box labeled second-order passive RC
network contains resisters and two (or sometime three) capacitors.
Vo (s )
Vi (s )
is the output voltage of an amplifier having gain K , and V ( s ) is the amplifier input
(1)
where the feedforward gain of the passive network, TFF ( s ) , is defined as:
TFF ( s ) =
V ( s)
Vi ( s ) V ( s ) =0
o
and the feedback gain of the passive network, TFB ( s) , is defined as:
(2)
TFB ( s ) =
V (s)
Vo ( s ) V ( s )=0
(3)
Vi (s)
Second-order
passive RC network
Vo (s )
V (s)
K
Fig. 1 The basic Sallen-Key topology, where Vi ( s) is the input voltage, Vo ( s) is the output voltage
of an amplifier having gain K , and V ( s ) is the amplifier input voltage.
(4)
We obtain the relationship between the input voltage Vi (s ) and the output voltage Vo (s ) in
term of TFF (s ) and TFB (s ) as:
Vo ( s ) =
KTFF ( s )
Vi ( s )
1 KTFB ( s )
(5)
Unless the RC network is degenerate, TFF ( s ) and TFB ( s) have the same denominator
polynomial D(s) as:
D( s ) = s 2 + b1s + b0
(6)
N FF ( s )
D( s )
(7)
and
TFB ( s ) =
N FB ( s )
D( s)
(8)
V ( s)
T ( s) = o
Vi ( s )
(9)
KN FF ( s )
=
D( s ) KN FB ( s )
KN FB (s ) can modify the coefficients of the denominator polynomial of T (s ) .
It is
evident that the poles of T (s ) can be placed anywhere in the complex plane by appropriately
choosing K . According to the different K values, we can classify two kinds of Sallen-Key
filters. If the amplifier gain K > 0 , this kind of circuit is called as the positive Sallen-Key filter.
Otherwise, if the amplifier gain K < 0 , the circuit is referred to as the negative Sallen-Key filter.
R1
R2
Vo (s )
C2
Ra
Rb
compute the feedforward and feedback gains of the passive network as:
TFF ( s ) =
N FF ( s )
D( s)
1
R1R2C1C2
=
1
R + R2
1
s2 +
+ 1
s +
R1R2C1C2
R2C2 R1R2C1
(10)
and
TFB ( s ) =
N FB ( s )
D( s )
1
s
R2C2
=
1
R + R2
1
s2 +
+ 1
s +
R1R2C1C2
R2C2 R1R2C1
(11)
Substituting Equations (10) and (11) into Equation (9), we can derive the transfer function
T (s) as:
K
R1 R2 C1C 2
T (s) =
1 K R1 + R2
1
s2 +
+
s +
R1 R2 C1C 2
R2 C 2 R1 R2 C1
(12)
K=
Ra + Rb
Ra
(13)
0 =
and the quality factor as:
1
R1 R2 C1C 2
(14)
1
R1R2C1C2
Q=
1 K R1 + R2
+
R2C2 R1R2C1
=
(1 K )
(15)
1
R1C1
R RC
+ 1 + 2 1 2
R2C2
R1 R2C1
Ra + Rb
Ra
).
on two principal aims: mathematical convenience and low element spread. The first needs no
elaboration. The second means that resistance and capacitance values should not be spread too
widely.
2. Based on the above choice, we can rewrite the expression for 0 and Q as:
1
RC
(16)
1
3 K
(17)
0 =
and
Q=
(18)
Note that the DC gain is equal to K for the above design. If we want the DC gain to be unity,
for instance, a voltage divider can be used to replace R1 .
equal-R and equal-C filter is excellent, it turns out that the quality factor is strongly sensitive to
variations in component values. Thus, it is of some interest to investigate an alternative design
in practice.
R1
R4
R2
Vo (s )
C1
C2
The low-pass negative Sallen-Key filter is shown in Fig. 3. We can use the same method to
derive the transfer function of the low-pass negative Sallen-Key filter as:
K
R1 R2C1C2
T ( s) =
1
1
1
1
1 1 + K
1
1
1
1
1
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
s2 +
s +
(19)
K=
Ro
R4
(20)
+
+
+
+
0 =
R2 R3 R1R2 R3 R4 R1R4 R2 R4 C1C2
and the quality factor is expressed as:
(21)
1+ K
1
1
1
1
+
+
+
+
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
1 2
3 4
1 4
2 4
2 3
Q=
1
1
1
1 C
1 C
+
+ 2 +
+ 1
R1 R2 R3 C1 R2 R4 C 2
(22)
R1 = R2 = R3 = R4 = R
and
K +5
RC
0 =
(23)
and
Q=
K +5
5
(24)
(25)
RC =
K +5
(26)
4. We choose the proper capacitance value of C , and then compute the resistance value of R .
5. We compute the resistance value of Ro as:
Ro = KR4
III. Design
Design example 1: the low-pass positive Sallen-Key filter
(27)
V. Experiments
1. Build two designed filters, using LF 351 Op Amps with a split power supply voltage of
15V.
2. Use the Channel One of digital oscilloscope to show the input voltage waveform, and
channel Two to show the output voltage waveform. Record the input and output voltage
waveforms at the frequencies, 10Hz, 100Hz, 1kHz, and 10kHz.
Measure the magnitude and phase responses of two designed filters.
is from 10Hz to 30kHz.
3.
EEL 4140
ANALOG FILTERS
LABORATORY 4
State-Variable Biquads
I.
Objective
To study design and implementation of state-variable biquads.
II. Introduction
In the previous experiment, one realization of biquads, Sallen-Key filter, was discussed.
In the Sallen-Key filter, a single amplifier embedded in a passive RC network is used to
generate a second-order transfer function. The structure of the Sallen-Key filter is relatively
simple. However, it is subject to great sensitivity to the constituent components values.
In this experiment, another biquad, the state-variable structure, will be studied. A
relatively high quality value can be achieved in this circuit. In addition, state-variable
biquads provide flexibility, good performance, and low sensitivity. The implementation of
the state-variable baud is based on the state-variable approach. State-variable methods of
solving differential equations are employed in the development of the realization. In the
implementation of these realizations, three basic active building blocks are generally used:
the summer, the integrator, and the lossy integrator.
In this experiment, two kinds of state-variable biquads will be introduced: Tow-Thomas
biquad and Kerwin-Huelsman-Newcomb (KHN) biquad.
Tow-Thomas Biquad
The structure of the Tow-Thomas biquad is shown as in Fig. 1. In this configuration, all
positive terminals of the Op Amps are grounded. The first basic building block composed
of the Op Amp U1 is a lossy integrator, while the second block is a summer amplifier, and
the third one is an integrator.
R4 , R5 , and R6
1
1 R6 R6
1
+
s 2 + s
R8
R1C1 R4C1 R7 R7 R3 R5C1C2
T (s) =
R8
1
R6
s2 + s
+
R1C1 R2 R3 R7 C1C2
From Equation (1), we can obtain the cutoff frequency as:
(1)
0 =
R8
R2 R3 R7 C1C2
(2)
R8C1
R2 R3 R7 C2
(3)
Since the numerator is of general second-order form, we can achieve any filter type by
choosing proper resistor values. For example, we can realize the secondorder band-pass
filter by choosing
R5 = R6 =
(4)
We
R8
R4 R7 C1
(5)
R8
1
s +s
+
R1C1 R2 R3 R7 C1C 2
2
In Equation (5), the voltage gain at the center frequency 0 is given as:
H BP =
R1 R8
R4 R7
(6)
R3
R1
C1
V1 ( s )
C2
R8
R4
R7
R2
U1
U2
+
Vo (s )
R6
R5
U3
(7)
and
R3 = R7 = R8 = R
(8)
R2 = 2 R3
= R
2
(9)
4. Based on the above chosen parameter values, Equations (2), (3), and (6) can be simplified
as following:
0 =
1
RC
(10)
R
Q= 1
R
(11)
R
H BP = 1
R4
(12)
1
0 RC
(13)
(14)
and
(15)
R4 =
R1
H BP
(16)
Kerwin-Huelsman-Newcomb Biquad
The Kerwin-Huelsman-Newcomb (KHN) biquad is shown in Fig.2.
composed of a summer amplifier and two integrators.
paths.
This circuit is
R5
C1
R6
C2
R2
R1
V1 ( s )
R3
U1
V2 ( s )
V4 ( s )
U2
R4
U3
V3 ( s )
V2 ( s )
H HP s 2
=
V1 ( s ) s 2 + 0 s + 2
Q
0
(17)
R
1+ 6
R5
H HP =
R
1+ 3
R4
the cutoff frequency 0 is given by:
(18)
R6
R5
02 =
R1R2C1C2
(19)
R
1+ 4
R3
Q=
R R R C
1 + 6 5 2 2
R5 R6 R1C1
(20)
H BP 0 s
V3 ( s )
Q
=
V1 ( s ) s 2 + 0 s + 2
Q
0
(21)
R
H BP = 4
R3
(22)
(23)
(24)
(25)
(26)
R1 = 2 R2
= 2R
(27)
0 =
Q=
1
RC
(28)
R
1 + 4
2
R3
H BP = 2
(29)
(30)
2Q
H BP + 1
(31)
R=
0C
(32)
R1 = 2 R
(33)
and
Q
R4 = 2 1 R
(34)
III. Design
Design example 1: the band-pass Tow-Thomas filter
Design a band-pass filter having the gain H BP = 3 , the quality factor Q = 5 , and the cutoff
frequency 0 = 2 *1000 rad / s , using the Tow-Thomas circuit.
IV.
Computer Simulations
1. Simulate the two designed band-pass filters.
2. Plot the magnitude and phase responses in the frequency range from 10Hz to 20 kHz.
3. Compare these two magnitude response plots, and understand the mechanism of the
quality factor Q .
V.
Experiments
1. Build above two designed biquad circuits, using LF 351 Op-amps with a split power
supply voltage of 15V.
2. Use the Channel One of digital oscilloscope to show the input voltage waveform, and
channel Two to show the output voltage waveform. Record the input and output voltage
waveforms at the frequencies, 10Hz, 100Hz, 1kHz, and 10kHz.
3. Measure the magnitude response for two circuits.
20kHz.
References
[1]. M. E. Van Valkenburg, Analog Filter Design, Chapter 5, Oxford University Press,
1982.
[2]. Dr. Robert Janes Martin, EEL 4140: Lab Manual for the Design of Analog Filters,
University of Central Florida, 1997.
[3]. E. Sanchez-Sinencio, Biquad I: The State-Variable Structure, Chapter 8, in RC Active
Filter Design Handbook, Edited by F. W. Stephenson, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1985.
EEL 4140
ANALOG FILTERS
LABORATORY 5
Single Op Amp Band-Pass Filters
I.
Objective
To design and implement single Op Amp band-pass biquad filters.
II. Introduction
Band-pass filters find wide use in modems, radio receivers, electro-optical systems, and
communications systems. The figure of merit for a band-pass filter is the quality factor which
is defined as the ratio of the center frequency to the 3dB bandwidth. The term quality factor
was first coined for band-pass filters in the first public communication systems. In early radio,
tuned radio frequency filters were used directly in front of the detector. These radios were very
noisy and had poor selectivity by todays standards. The sharper the transition from the pass
band to the stop band, the better the rejection of the adjacent channels. This led to better
separation of stations. A larger center frequency to bandwidth ratio was associated with higher
quality factor.
The circuit used in this experiment is the multi-loop feedback filter. Its basic circuit
configuration is shown in Fig. 1. This structure is similar to Sallen-Key filters. There are,
however, two major differences. The first difference is that the active element is an Op Amp in
the multi-loop feedback structure rather than a finite-gain amplifier. The second difference is
that there are two feedback paths (rather than one) from the output of the amplifier to the RC
network. This is the reason for the name, multi-loop feedback filter.
The multi-loop feedback circuit can achieve the low-pass, high-pass, or band-pass filter by
choosing the different RC networks. In this experiment, only the band-pass filter is discussed.
First, a basic band-pass structure without the positive feedback is introduced. Then, another
band-pass realization increases the quality factor by incorporating the positive feedback. The
design procedures for these two realizations are also given.
Vi (s )
Passive RC network
Vo (s)
V (s)
T ( s) = o
Vi ( s )
s
R1C2
=
1
1
1
1
s +
+
s 2 +
+
C2 R2 C1R2 C1C2 R1R2 C1C2 R2 R3
Notice that this band-pass transfer function is an inverting one.
(1)
R3
R1
R3C1
R3C 2
+
R2 C 2
R2 C1
(2)
and
R3
R1
R2 R3C1C 2
1+
0 =
(3)
R2
R1
H BP =
C
1+ 2
C1
(4)
C2
Vi (s )
R2
C1
R1
Vo (s )
R3
Design Procedure for Band-Pass Multiple-Loop Feedback Filters without the Positive
Feedback
1. Given the design specifications, 0 , Q , and H BP .
2. In the band-pass multi-loop feedback filter, it is convenient to use the equal-value capacitor
design.
(5)
R1 =
Q
0CH BP
(6)
R2 =
2Q
0C
(7)
R3 =
Q
0 C 2Q 2 H BP
(8)
Note that in Equation (8), H BP must be less than 2Q 2 in order that R2 be finite and
positive.
The positive
To simplify
equations describing the circuit, the effect of these two resistors is presented by defining a
constant K as:
K=
Ra
Rb
C2
Vi (s )
(9)
R2
C1
R1
Vo (s )
+
Ra
Rb
V (s)
T ( s) = o
Vi ( s )
s (K + 1)
R1C2
=
1
K
1
1
+
s 2 + s
+
From Equation (10), we obtain the quality factor Q and the cutoff frequency 0 as:
(10)
1
=
Q
R1 C1
C2
+
K
R2 C2
C1
R2
R1
C2
C1
(11)
and
0 =
1
R1 R2 C1C 2
(12)
(K + 1)
H BP =
R1C1
1
1
K
+
R2C 2 R2 C1 R1C1
(13)
From Equation (11), it is clear that the quality factor is improved by introducing positive
feedback K . The design procedure for this filter is based on the solution of these equations, and
is summarized in following.
Design Procedure for Band-Pass Multiple-Loop Feedback Filters with the Positive
Feedback
1. Given the design specifications 0 and Q .
2. As before, it is convenient to use an equal-value capacitor design, in which the capacitors
C1 and C 2 have the same value.
as:
C1 = C 2 = C
(14)
3. Determine the ratio parameter m0 that would be required if there are no positive feedbacks
as:
m0 =
1
4Q 2
4. Select the desired resistor ratio m , which is less than one, and greater than m0 .
(15)
R
m= 1
R2
(16)
m
Q
(17)
(18)
0C m
(19)
(20)
H BP =
K +1
2m K
(21)
III. Design
Design example 1: the second-order band-pass multi-loop filter without positive feedback
Design a second-order band-pass filter having the gain H BP = 2 , the quality factor Q = 2 , and
the center frequency 0 = 10 4 rad / s , using the multi-loop structure without positive feedback.
Choose the appropriate values of capacitors and resistors, following the above procedure.
Design example 2: the second-order band-pass multi-loop filter with positive feedback
Design a second-order band-pass filter having the quality factor Q = 10 and the center
Choose the
V. Experiments
1. Build above two designed band-pass filters, using LF 351 Op-amps with a split power supply
voltage of 15V.
2. Use the Channel One of digital oscilloscope to show the input voltage waveform, and
channel Two to show the output voltage waveform. Record the input and output voltage
waveforms at the frequencies, 10Hz, 100Hz, 1kHz, and 10kHz.
3. Measure the magnitude responses of two filters.
30kHz.
EEL 4140
ANALOG FILTERS
LABORATORY 6
Two Op Amps Current Generalized Immittance
Structure (CGIC) Based Biquad
I.
Objective
To study CGIC biquads, to use this structure to design second-order low-pass and band-pass
filters with given specifications, and to functionally tune the above circuits to get the specified
values of the cutoff frequency and the quality factor.
II. Introduction
The general CGIC structure is shown in Fig. 1.
and output terminals, V2 ( s ) , V3 ( s ) , and V4 ( s ) , assuming ideal Op Amps, are given below:
V ( s)
T1 ( s ) = 3
Vi ( s )
Y YY
Y5 + h( s ) Y7 1 + 6 5 8
Y2 Y2
=
D( s)
(1)
V ( s)
T2 ( s ) = 4
V1 ( s )
Y YY
Y5 1 + 8 6 7 + h( s )Y7
Y4 Y4
=
D( s)
(2)
and
V ( s)
T3 ( s ) = 2
Vi ( s )
Y + h( s )Y7
= 5
D( s)
(3)
where
YY
h( s ) = 2 3
Y1Y4
(4)
D ( s ) = (Y5 + Y6 ) + h( s )(Y7 + Y8 )
(5)
The most commonly used second-order transfer functions can be easily generated from the
above equations, as summarized in Table 1. By using minimum sensitivity constraints in circuit
1, 3, 7, 10, and 12, possible sets of element values have been obtained, as shown in Table 2. In
this experiment, two kinds of filters will be discussed in detail: a low-pass filter using the
number 1 circuit, and a band-pass filter using the number 7 circuit.
Y1
Y3
V3 ( s )
Y2
Y4
V4 ( s)
Y7
Y5
V2 ( s )
V1 ( s )
Y6
Vi (s )
Y8
G
Q
(7)
(8)
and
C 2 = C3 = C
(9)
1
.
R
2 2
R C
1
s
s2 +
+
2
RCQ R C 2
(10)
0 =
4. Choose an appropriate capacitor value C .
1
RC
(11)
R=
1
C o
(12)
R3 = RQ
(13)
5. Consequently,
C3
R3
R1
C2
R4
+
Vi (s )
R5
Vo (s )
R8
(14)
G1 = G2 = G4 = G6 = G
(15)
G
Q
(16)
G8 = 0
(17)
G7 =
and
(18)
R=
1
C o
(19)
R7 = RQ
(20)
5. Consequently,
C3
R1
Vo ( s )
R4
R2
+
R6
+
Vi ( s )
R7
C8
III. Design
Design example 1: the second-order Butterworth low-pass CGIC filter
Design a second-order low-pass filter with a quality factor Q = 0.707 , and a cutoff frequency
0 = 2 * 2 *10 3 rad / s .
Compute the
0 = 2 * 3 *103 rad / s .
Compute the
V. Experiments
1. Build above the CGIC filters designed in part III, using LF 351 Op Amps with a split power
supply voltage of 15V.
2. The circuits need to be functionally tuned to yield the specified values of the quality factor
In the case of the low-pass filter, the circuit is first tuned for 0 .
the frequency 0 , then adjusting R8 and monitoring the phase angle difference between the
output and input voltages.
The circuit is tuned for 0 when the output voltage lags the input
voltage by 90 degrees.
To tune the circuit to attain the specified Q , the gain H LP (the ratio of the output voltage
between the input voltage) at a low frequency, much lower than 0 (usually a few Hz but not
to 0Hz), is determined.
input voltage by 45 degrees when the frequency of the sinusoidal input is the lower cutoff
frequency 1 .
3. Use the Channel One of digital oscilloscope to show the input voltage waveform, and
channel Two to show the output voltage waveform. Record the input and output voltage
waveforms at the frequencies, 10Hz, 100Hz, 1kHz, and 10kHz.
4. Measure the magnitude response for each of two circuits after functional tuning is complete.
The frequency range is from 10Hz to 30kHz.
specifications.
3. The computer simulation results: the magnitude and phase responses for both circuits.
4. The experiment results: the magnitude responses for both filters and the recorded graphs.
5. Summary and conclusions.
References
[1]. Wasfy B. Mikhael, 2 OA Current Generalized Immittance Structure (CGIC) Based
Biquad, Lab Manual, University of Central Florida.
[2]. Wasfy B. Mikhael, Biquad II: The Current Generalized Immittance (CGIC) Structure,
Chapter 9, in RC Active Filter Design Handbook, Edited by F. W. Stephenson, John Wiley &
Sons, Inc., 1985.
[3]. Wasfy B. Mikhael, The Current Generalized Immittance (CGIC Biquad), Chapter 82, in
Circuits and Filter Design Handbook, Edited by F. W. Stephenson, CRC Press, 2003, pp
2495-2514.
Table 1 Element identification for realizing the most commonly transfer functions
Circuit
Number
Y1
Y2
Y3
Y4
Y5
Y6
Y7
Y8
G1
sC2
sC3+G3
G4
G5
G8
sC1
G2
G3
sC4+G4
G6
G7
sC8+G8
G1
G2
sC3
G4
G6
sC7
sC8+G8
G1
G2
sC3
G4
G6
sC 7
1 + sC 7 R7
0
0
Transfer Function
T2 ( s ) =
G1G5 (G4 + G8 )
s 2 C 2 C3 G8 + sC 2 G3G8 + G1G4 G5
G
G2 G3 G7 1 + 6
G2
T1 ( s ) = 2
s C1C 4 G6 + s (C 2 G4 G6 + C8 G2 G3 ) + G2 G3 (G7 + G8 )
T1 ( s ) =
T1 ( s ) =
s 2 C 3C 7 (G2 + G6 )
s 2 (C 7 + C8 )G2 C3 + sC3G2 G8 + G6 G1G4
s 2 C3C 7 (G2 + G6 )
s C3C 7 G2 + sC 7 G1G4 G6 R7 + G6 G1G4
Remarks
Low-pass
Low-pass
High-pass
High-pass
G1
sC2
sC3
G4
sC5
G6
G8
G
sC5 G1G4 1 + 8
G4
T2 ( s ) = 2
s C 2 C3 G8 + sC5 G1G4 + G1G4 G6
Band -pass
sC1
G2
G3
sC4+G4
G6
sC7
G8
G
sC 7 G2 G3 1 + 6
G2
T1 ( s ) = 2
s C1C 4 G6 + s(C 7 G2 G3 + C1G4 G8 ) + G2 G3G8
Band-pass
G1
G2
sC3
G4
G6
G7
sC8+G8
sC1
G2
G3
sC4
G5
G7
sC8
T1 ( s ) =
sC3G7 (G2 + G6 )
s 2 C3C8 G2 + sC3G2 (G7 + G8 ) + G1G4 G6
T2 ( s ) =
s 2 C1G5 (C 4 + C8 ) + G2 G3G7
s 2 C1C 4 G5 + sC8 G2 G3 + G2 G3G7
Band-pass
Notch
G1
G2
sC3
G4
G5
sC7
G8
10
G1
G2
sC3
G4
G5
G6
sC7
sC8+G8
11
sC1
G2
G3
sC4
G5
G6
G7
sC8
12
G1
G2
sC3
G4
G5
G6
sC7
G8
T2 ( s ) =
Notch
2 G1G4G5 C7
s +
C3C7 G2 C7 + C8
T3 ( s ) =
G8
G G (G + G6 )
s2 + s
+ 1 4 5
C7 + C8 C3G2 (C7 + C8 )
T1 ( s ) =
T1 ( s ) =
Notch
For all-pass:
G6 = 0
G5 = G 2
For all-pass:
G6 = 0
G5 = G 2
Design values
(from Table 1)
1
G1 = G4 = G5 = G8 = G , G3 = G Q , C 2 = C3 = C , where C = G 0
G1 = G2 = G4 = G6 = G , G8 = G Q , C8 = 0 , C3 = C7 = C , where
C = G 0
G1 = G2 = G4 = G6 = G , G7 = G Q , G8 = 0 , C3 = C8 = C , where
C = G 0
10
G1 = G2 = G4 = G5 + G6 = G , G8 = G Q , C3 = C7 + C8 = C , where
0 = G C and n2 = 0G5 C 7
12
Tuning sequence
G1 = G2 = G4 = G5 = G , G6 = 0 , C3 = C7 = C , G8 = G Q , where
C = G 0
Note: D( s ) = s 2 + ( 0 Q )s + 02
T2 ( s ) =
2 02
D( s )
G8
G3
T1 ( s ) =
2s 2
D( s)
G4
G8
G2
G7
G2
G6
G8
G4
G4
G8
T1 ( s ) =
(2 0 Q )s
D( s)
C7 s 2 + n2
T3 ( s ) =
C D( s)
T1 ( s ) =
D( s )
D( s)
Study Guide C
EEL 4140
EEL 4140
ANALOG FILTERS
LABORATORY 7
High-Order Low-Pass Filter Design
I.
Objective
To study the cascade design method for realizing high-order filters. Current Generalized
Immittance Structure (CGIC) Biquads are employed to build high-order low-pass filters.
II. Introduction
The previous experiments have discussed the design of first-order and second-order filters.
In this experiment, one design method for the high-order filter is introduced: the cascade design
method. This method is the most commonly used method because of its simplicity. It is based
on cascading first-order and second-order filter sections in such a manner that each section does
not interact with others.
For the cascade design method, the effect of component variations on the overall frequency
response is large. Thus, the cascade design method may be tolerated for the applications where
only a few filters are constructed and manual tuning is used, or where filter specifications are not
particularly tight. However, when filters are produced in large quantities and are subjected to
stringent specifications, the cascade design method is not recommended.
The cascade design method usually consists of three steps: decomposing transfer functions
into poles and zeros, grouping poles and zeros into first-order or second-order filter sections, and
synthesizing these filter sections.
Step 2: Grouping poles and zeros into first-order or second-order filter sections
In determining the order of sections and pairing of poles and zeros, it is important to
consider the occurrence of internal resonances. This refers to the phenomenon of the
large-voltage buildup at certain frequencies at internal nodes of filters (usually at the output
terminal of an Op Amp). Thus, the gain to one of these nodes from the input of the filter may
be higher than the gain to the output of the filter. Consequently, clipping may occur at output of
an internal Op Amp before the filter output voltage shows clipping. This internal clipping will
show up as a level-dependent change in the overall frequency characteristic, and will restrict the
range of input signal levels that the filter can handle.
In order to achieve maximum dynamic range, the filter should be designed such that the
clipping will first occur at the output of the last Op Amp of the filter. The following rules of
thumb are useful in maximizing the dynamic range of cascaded design filters.
Rule 1: Place the sections in the order of increasing Q values. (The Q value of the first-order
section is assumed to be zero.)
Rule 2: Group the pole and the zero, which are closest in the S plate.
Rule 3: Distribute the overall gain equally among the sections.
In this experiment, the low-pass CGIC Biquad, which was studied in the last experiment, is
used as the build-up circuit block for the high-order low-pass filter. The circuit of the CGIC
low-pass Biquad is shown in Fig. 1. In this Biquad, the resistor and capacitor values are chosen
as:
R1 = R4 = R5 = R8 = R
(1)
and
C 2 = C3 = C
(2)
Based on these resistance and capacitance values in Equation (1) and (2), the transfer function is
given by:
2
R C2
TCGIC ( s ) =
s
1
s2 +
+ 2 2
R3C R C
2
From Equation (3), we can obtain the cutoff frequency 0 and the quality factor Q as:
(3)
0 =
1
RC
(4)
Q=
R3
R
(5)
and
When we use this circuit to realize a second-order transfer function, we first choose the
capacitor value C . Then, we can compute the resistor value R using Equation (4). Finally,
we can compute the resistance value of R3 using Equation (5).
C3
R3
R1
C2
R4
+
Vi (s )
R5
Vo (s )
R8
0 = 25,000rad / s
(6)
2. The normalized six-order Chebyshev low-pass transfer function with a maximum pass-band
attenuation of 1.0dB is given as:
Tnorm ( s) =
0.061415
(7)
s + 0.12436s + 0.99073 s + 0.33976s + 0.55772 s 2 + 0.46413s + 0.12471
)(
)(
3. From (7), it can be seen that this high-order filter consists of three second-order sections.
2 * 0.99073
s + 0.12436 s + 0.99073
Tnorm1(s) =
2 * 0.55772
s + 0.33976 s + 0.55772
Tnorm 2 ( s ) =
(8)
(9)
and
Tnorm 3 ( s ) =
2 * 0.12471
s + 0.46413s + 0.12471
(10)
s
and (10). Consequently, we obtain the following denormalized transfer functions as:
1.24 *10 9
T1(s) = 2
s + 3.11*10 3 s + 6.192 *10 8
(11)
6.97 *10 9
s 2 + 8.49 *10 3 s + 3.49 *10 8
(12)
1.56 *10 8
T3 ( s ) = 2
s + 1.16 *10 4 s + 7.79 *10 7
(13)
T2 ( s ) =
and
For the denormalized transfer function T1 ( s ) , the cutoff frequency 0,1 and the quality
factor Q1 are given as follows:
(14)
and
Q1 = 8.00
(15)
In the same way, the cutoff frequency 0,2 and the quality factor Q2 corresponding to the
(16)
and
Q2 = 2.20
(17)
For the transfer function T3 ( s ) , the cutoff frequency 0,3 and the quality factor Q3 are given
by:
(18)
and
Q3 = 0.76
(19)
Q1 > Q2 > Q3
(20)
4. Notice that
According to Rule 1, we arrange these sections in the increasing order of the quality factor.
first section is used to synthesize T3 ( s ) .
The
For all
(21)
R3 = R * Q1 = 4.02k * 8 = 32.16k
(22)
R=
C 0,1
and
R=
C 0, 2
1
= 5.36k
0.01 * 18.67
(23)
and
(24)
Similarly, the following resistance values are chosen for the third section.
R=
C 0,3
1
= 11.33k
0.01 * 8.829
(25)
and
(26)
6. Cascade these three filter sections into a six-order Chebyshev low-pass filter. In this
application, the output of each section is the Op Amp output. Thus, the output resistance is
assumed to be zero. Consequently, there is no need to insert buffer here. The final schematic
circuit of this high-order filter is shown in Fig. 2.
III. Design
Design example: the six-order Butterworth low-pass filter.
The normalized transfer function is given as:
T (s) =
(27)
V. Experiments
1. Build the six-order Butterworth filter designed in part III, using LF 351 Op Amps with a split
0.01uF
11.33k
0.01uF
+
Vi (s )
8.61k
11.33k
0.01uF
5.36k
0.01uF
11.79k
5.36k
0.01uF
11.33k
32.16k
4.02k
0.01uF
5.36k
11.33k
4.02k
4.02k
5.36k
Vo (s)
4.02k
Study Guide C
EEL 4140
EEL 4140
ANALOG FILTERS
LABORATORY 8
Butterworth Filter Approximation
I.
Objective
To study Butterworth approximations of low-pass, band-pass, and high-pass filters.
II. Introduction
The magnitude response of the low-pass Butterworth filter is expressed as:
T ( j ) =
1
1 + ( 0 )
2n
(1)
1
2n
1 + (s j 0 )
(2)
n s
1 + ( 1)
0
2n
s
1 + ( 1)
0
2n
=0
(3)
e 2n ,
n is odd
0
,
s=
j (2 k +1)
2n
, n is even
0 e
k = 0,1,...,2n 1
(4)
e 2n ,
0
s=
j (2k +1)
0 e 2n ,
n is odd, k =
n +1 n + 3
n + (2n 1)
,
,...,
2
2
2
n is even, k =
Thus, poles
(5)
n n
n
, + 1,..., + (n - 1)
2 2
2
From Equation (5), it is can be seen that the poles of the low-pass Butterworth filter are
located on the circle with the radius 0 , and are separated by n = n .
pole on the real axis. If n is even, there are poles at = n 2 .
If n is odd, there is a
As examples, the pole
locations of the 4th and 5th order low-pass Butterworth filters are shown in Fig. 1 and Fig.2,
respectively.
j
n=4
j 0
n = 45o
n 2
j 0
Fig. 1 The pole locations of the 4th order low-pass Butterworth filter
n=5
j 0
n = 36 o
n
j 0
Fig. 2 The pole locations of the 5th order low-pass Butterworth filter
The
( ) = 20 log T ( j ) dB
(6)
The specifications for low-pass, high-pass, and band-pass filters are shown in Fig. 3, Fig. 4,
and Fig. 5, respectively.
= s,1 , and from = s,2 to = ) should be larger than min ; the attenuation at the
pass-band (from = p,1 to = p,2 ) should be smaller than max .
min
pass-band
stop-band
max
p
min
pass-band
stop-band
max
s
min
min
pass-band
stop-band
stop-band
max
s ,1 p ,1
p,2
s,2
The
low-pass
filter
specifications
are
given
n=
Round
3.
[(
(7)
n=5
(8)
0,1 =
[10
s
max
1
10
1 2n
= 1263.2rad / s
(9)
0,2 =
[10
min
1
10
1 2n
= 1234.1rad / s
(10)
The actual cutoff frequency is the geometric average of the pass-band and stop-band cutoff
frequencies as:
(11)
Using this way, the excess attenuations are achieved at the frequency s and p .
4.
Obtain the normalized low-pass Butterworth transfer function, according to the filter order n .
T (s) =
(s + 1) s 2 +
s
s
+ 1 s 2 +
+ 1
0.62
1.62
5.
(12)
The
T (s) =
1
s 2
s
s 2
s
s
+ 1
+
+ 1
+
+ 1
2
2 1.62 0
0
0 0.62 0
0
(13)
5.6566 * 1015
The
high-pass
filter
specifications
are
given
p _ low =
The pass
= 0.0229rad/s
(14)
= 0.08rad / s
(15)
and
s _ low =
3.
attenuation should be at most max = 1dB at the frequency p _ low = 0.0229rad / s , and the
attenuation should be at least min = 25dB at the frequency s _ low = 0.08rad / s .
Then, the order of the corresponding low-pass filter is n = 3 , and the cutoff frequency is
0 = 0.0296rad/s .
by
T ( s ) low _ mod el =
1
2
s
s
s
+ 1
+
+ 1
2
0.0296
0.0296 0.0296
(16)
4.
Change the corresponding low-pass transfer function into the high-pass transfer function by
1
substituting s in Equation (16) with .
s
T (s) =
1
1
1
1
+
+ 1
+ 1
(17)
s3
The band-pass filter specifications: min = 25dB , max = 0.5dB , p,1 = 500rad / s ,
p,2 = 1000rad / s , s,1 = 250rad / s , and s,2 = 2000rad / s . The center frequency c is
given by:
c = p,1 p,2
= s,1 s,2
= 707.1rad/s
2. Change the band-pass specifications to the corresponding low-pass specifications.
pass and stop frequencies of the corresponding low-pass filter are given by:
(18)
The
(19)
(20)
attenuation must be at most max = 0.5dB at frequency p _ low = 500rad / s , and the
attenuation must be at least min = 25dB at the frequency s _ low = 1750rad / s
The order of the corresponding low-pass filter is n = 4
is 0 = 744.6rad/s .
by:
Tlow _ mod el =
4.
1
s2
s 2
s
s
+
+ 1
+
+ 1
744.6 2 744.6 * 0.54 744.6 2 744.6 * 1.31
(21)
Change the corresponding low-pass filter model into the band-pass filter by substituting s
s 2 + c2
.
s
T (s) =
1
2
s + 707.1
2 2
s 2 + 707.12
744.6 2 +
(744.6* 0.54) + 1
1
2
2
2
2
s + 707.12
2 s + 707.1
+
744
6
.
s
s
(22)
(744.6*1.31) + 1
III. Design
1. Find the poles of the normalized 9th and 10th order low-pass Butterworth transfer function
( 0 = 1rad / s ).
2.
4.
No actual experiment.
References
[1]. M. E. Van Valkenburg, Analog Filter Design, Oxford University Press, 1982.
APPENDIX
Brown
Red
Orange
Yellow
Green
Blue
Violet
Gray
White
bands to read digits to the left of the multiplier. They have a different temperature coefficient
in order to provide the 1% tolerance.
Examples
Example 1:
You are given a resistor whose stripes are colored from left to right as brown, black, orange,
gold. Find the resistance value.
Step One: The gold stripe is on the right so go to Step Two.
Step Two: The first stripe is brown which has a value of 1. The second stripe is black which
has a value of 0. Therefore the first two digits of the resistance value are 10.
Step Three: The third stripe is orange which means x 1,000.
Step Four: The value of the resistance is found as 10 x 1000 = 10,000 ohms (10 kilohms =
10 kohms).
The gold stripe means the actual value of the resistor mar vary by 5% meaning the actual
value will be somewhere between 9,500 ohms and 10,500 ohms. (Since 5% of 10,000 = 0.05
x 10,000 = 500)
Example 2:
You are given a resistor whose stripes are colored from left to right as orange, orange,
brown, silver. Find the resistance value.
Step One: The silver stripe is on the right so go to Step Two.
Step Two: The first stripe is orange which has a value of 3. The second stripe is orange
which has a value of 3. Therefore the first two digits of the resistance value are 33.
Step Three: The third stripe is brown which means x 10.
Step Four: The value of the resistance is found as 33 x 10 = 330 ohms.
The silver stripe means the actual value of the resistor mar vary by 10% meaning the actual
value will be between 297 ohms and 363 ohms. (Since 10% of 330 = 0.10 x 330 = 33)
Example 3:
You are given a resistor whose stripes are colored from left to right as blue, gray, red, gold.
Find the resistance value.
Step One: The gold stripe is on the right so go to Step Two.
Step Two: The first stripe is blue which has a value of 6. The second stripe is gray which has
a value of 8. Therefore the first two digits of the resistance value are 68.
Step Three: The third stripe is red which means x 100.
Step Four: The value of the resistance is found as 68 x 100 = 6800 ohms (6.8 kilohms = 6.8
kohms).
The gold stripe means the actual value of the resistor mar vary by 5% meaning the actual
value will be somewhere between 6,460 ohms and 7,140 ohms. (Since 5% of 6,800 = 0.05 x
6,800 = 340)
Example 4:
You are given a resistor whose stripes are colored from left to right as green, brown, black,
gold. Find the resistance value.
Step One: The gold stripe is on the right so go to Step Two.
Step Two: The first stripe is green which has a value of 5. The second stripe is brown which
has a value of 1. Therefore the first two digits of the resistance value are 51.
Step Three: The third stripe is black which means x 1.
Step Four: The value of the resistance is found as 51 x 1 = 51 ohms.
The gold stripe means the actual value of the resistor mar vary by 5% meaning the actual
value will be somewhere between 48.45 ohms and 53.55 ohms. (Since 5% of 51 = 0.05 x 51
= 2.5