Federal Register / Vol. 72, No.
197 / Friday, October 12, 2007 / Notices 58055
reviewed companies did not know their
merchandise was destined for the
United States. In such instances, we will
instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed
entries at the all–others rate if there is
no rate for the intermediate
company(ies) involved in the
transaction. For a full discussion of this
clarification, see Assessment of
Antidumping Duties.
Export Price
With respect to export–price (EP)
sales, we divided the total dumping
margins (calculated as the difference
between normal value and the EP) for
each exporter’s importer or customer by
the total number of units the exporter
sold to that importer or customer. We
will direct CBP to assess the resulting
per–unit dollar amount against each
unit of merchandise on each of that
importer’s or customer’s entries under
the relevant order during the review
period.
Constructed Export Price
For constructed export–price (CEP)
sales, we divided the total dumping
margins for the reviewed sales by the
total entered value of those reviewed
sales for each importer. We will direct
CBP to assess the resulting percentage
margin against the entered customs
values for the subject merchandise on
each of that importer’s entries under the
relevant order during the review period.
See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).
Cash–Deposit Requirements
To calculate the cash–deposit rate for
each respondent (i.e., each exporter
and/or manufacturer included in these
reviews), we divided the total dumping
margins for each company by the total
net value of that company’s sales of
merchandise during the review period
subject to each order.
To derive a single deposit rate for
each respondent, we weight–averaged
the EP and CEP deposit rates (using the
EP and CEP, respectively, as the
weighting factors). To accomplish this
when we sampled CEP sales, we first
calculated the total dumping margins
for all CEP sales during the review
period by multiplying the sample CEP
margins by the ratio of total days in the
review period to days in the sample
weeks. We then calculated a total net
value for all CEP sales during the review
period by multiplying the sample CEP
total net value by the same ratio.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Finally, we divided the combined total
dumping margins for both EP and CEP
sales by the combined total value for
both EP and CEP sales to obtain the
deposit rate.
VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:35 Oct 11, 2007 Jkt 214001
We will direct CBP to collect the
resulting percentage deposit rate against
the entered customs value of each of the
exporter’s entries of subject
merchandise entered, or withdrawn
from warehouse, for consumption on or
after the date of publication of this
notice. Entries of parts incorporated into
finished bearings before sales to an
unaffiliated customer in the United
States will receive the respondent’s
deposit rate applicable to the order.
Furthermore, the following deposit
requirements will be effective upon
publication of this notice of final results
of administrative reviews for all
shipments of the subject merchandise
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption on or after the date of
publication, consistent with section
751(a)(1) of the Act: (1) the cash–deposit
rates for the reviewed companies will be
the rates shown above; (2) for previously
reviewed or investigated companies not
listed above, the cash–deposit rate will
continue to be the company–specific
rate published for the most recent
period; (3) if the exporter is not a firm
covered in this review, a prior review,
or the original less–than-fair–value
(LTFV) investigation but the
manufacturer is, the cash–deposit rate
will be the rate established for the most
recent period for the manufacturer of
the merchandise; (4) the cash–deposit
rate for all other manufacturers or
exporters will continue to be the ‘‘All
Others’’ rate for the relevant order made
effective by the final results of review
published on July 26, 1993. See
Antifriction Bearings (Other Than
Tapered Roller Bearings) and Parts
Thereof from France, et al: Final Results
of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Reviews and Revocation in Part of an
Antidumping Duty Order, 58 FR 39729
(July 26, 1993). For ball bearings from
Italy, see Antifriction Bearings (Other
Than Tapered Roller Bearings) and
Parts Thereof from France, et al; Final
Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Reviews and Partial
Termination of Administrative Reviews,
61 FR 66471, 66521 (December 17,
1996). These rates are the ‘‘All Others’’
rates from the relevant LTFV
investigation.
These deposit requirements shall
remain in effect until further notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a final reminder
to importers of their responsibility
under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a
certificate regarding the reimbursement
of antidumping duties prior to
liquidation of the relevant entries
during these review periods. Failure to
comply with this requirement could
PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\12OCN1.SGM
result in the Department’s presumption
that reimbursement of antidumping
duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of doubled antidumping
duties.
Notification Regarding APOs
This notice also serves as a reminder
to parties subject to administrative
protective order (APO) of their
responsibility concerning the
disposition of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely
notification of the return or destruction
of APO materials or conversion to
judicial protective order is hereby
requested. Failure to comply with the
regulations and the terms of an APO is
a sanctionable violation.
We are issuing and publishing these
results in accordance with sections
751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act.
Dated: Ocotober 4, 2007.
David M. Spooner,
Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
Appendix
1. Zeroing of Negative Margins
2. Model–Matching Methodology
3. Constructed Export–Price Offset
4. Inventory Carrying Costs
5. Calculation of Cost of Production and
Constructed Value
6. Use of Acquisition Costs
7. Miscellaneous Issues
A. Deduction of Japanese–Worker
Expenses
B. U.S. Duty
C. Exclusion of High–Profit Sales
D. NTN Bearing Design
E. Further–Processing Methodology
F. Completeness of Reported U.S. Sales
G. 15-day Issuance of Liquidation
Instructions
[FR Doc. E7–20151 Filed 10–11–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–893]
Notice of Extension of the Final
Results of Antidumping Duty New
Shipper Review: Certain Frozen
Warmwater Shrimp from the People’s
Republic of China
AGENCY: Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
EFFECTIVE DATE: October 12, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Cindy Lai Robinson, AD/CVD
Operations, Office 9, Import
12OCN1
 58056 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 197 / Friday, October 12, 2007 / Notices
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW, Washington DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–3797.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On July 26, 2007, the Department of
Commerce (‘‘the Department’’)
published a preliminary notice of intent
to rescind the antidumping duty new
shipper review of certain frozen warm
water shrimp from the People’s
Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’) with respect
to Maoming Changxing Foods Co., Ltd.
(‘‘Maoming Changxing’’), covering the
period February 1, 2006, through July
31, 2007. See Certain Frozen
Warmwater Shrimp from the People’s
Republic of China: Preliminary Notice of
Intent to Rescind Antidumping Duty
New Shipper Review, 72 FR 41058 (July
26, 2007).
Extension of Time Limit of Final
Results
The final results for this new shipper
review are currently due on October 17,
2007. Consistent with section
751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of the Tariff Act of 1930,
as amended (‘‘Act’’) and 19 CFR
351.214(i)(2), the Department is
extending the time limit for the
completion of the final results of this
new shipper review by 60 days because
the case is extraordinarily complicated.
This new shipper review involves
complicated ownership and affiliation
issues which will require the
Department to consider arguments by
interested parties regarding the actual
owners and the source of founding
capital with respect to Maoming
Changxing. In addition, the Department
requires additional time to consider
domestic producers’ arguments
regarding the antidumping duty rate to
apply to Maoming Changxing.
Because of the complexity of issues in
this case, and in accordance with
section 751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of the Act and 19
CFR 351.214(i)(2), we are extending the
time period for issuing the final results
of the new shipper review of Maoming
Changxing by 60 days. Since a 60-day
extension would result in the deadline
for the final results falling on December
16, 2007, which is Sunday, the new
deadline for the final results will be the
next business day, December 17, 2007.
See Notice of Clarification: Application
of ‘‘Next Business Day’’ Rule for
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Administrative Determination Deadlines
Pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930, As
Amended, 70 FR 24533 (May 10, 2005).
This notice is published pursuant to
sections 751(a)(2)(B)(iv) and 777(i)(1) of
VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:35 Oct 11, 2007 Jkt 214001
the Act and section 351.214(i)(2) of the
Department’s regulations.
Dated: October 4, 2007.
Stephen J. Claeys,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. E7–20152 Filed 10–11–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–549–812]
Notice of Final Results of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review: Furfuryl
Alcohol from Thailand
AGENCY: Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On August 2, 2007, the
Department of Commerce published the
preliminary results of the administrative
review of the antidumping duty order
on furfuryl alcohol from Thailand. The
period of review is July 1, 2005, through
May 3, 2006. The final results do not
differ from the preliminary results of
this review, in which we found that
sales of the subject merchandise have
not been made below normal value.
EFFECTIVE DATE: October 12, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Damian Felton or Brandon Farlander,
AD/CVD Operations, Office 1, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–0133 and (202)
482–0182, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On July 25, 1995, the Department
published an antidumping duty order
on furfuryl alcohol from Thailand. See
Furfuryl Alcohol from Thailand: Notice
of Amended Final Antidumping Duty
Determination and Order, 60 FR 38035
(July 25, 1995). On August 30, 2006, the
Department published a notice of
initiation for this administrative review.
See Notice of Initiation of Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Administrative
Reviews, 71 FR 51573 (August 30, 2006).
On August 2, 2007, the Department
published in the Federal Register its
preliminary results of the administrative
review of this order. See Furfuryl
Alcohol from Thailand; Preliminary
Results of 2005–2006 Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review, 72 FR 42390
(August 2, 2007) (‘‘Preliminary
Results’’). In the Preliminary Results,
the Department invited interested
PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\12OCN1.SGM
parties to submit briefs and request a
hearing. No briefs were received and the
Department did not conduct a hearing
because none was requested.
Scope of the Order
The merchandise covered by this
order is furfuryl alcohol
(C4H3OCH2OH). Furfuryl alcohol is a
primary alcohol, and is colorless or pale
yellow in appearance. It is used in the
manufacture of resins and as a wetting
agent and solvent for coating resins,
nitrocellulose, cellulose acetate, and
other soluble dyes.
The product subject to this order is
classifiable under subheading
2932.13.00 of the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States (HTSUS).
Although the HTSUS subheading is
provided for convenience and customs
purposes, our written description of the
scope of this proceeding is dispositive.
Period of Review
The period of review (‘‘POR’’) is July
1, 2005, through May 3, 2006.1
Final Results of Review
As noted above, the Department
received no comments concerning the
Preliminary Results. Consistent with the
Preliminary Results, we find that a de
minimis (i.e., less than 0.50 percent)
dumping margin exists for Indorama
Chemicals (Thailand) Ltd. during the
POR. Because no party submitted
comments on the Preliminary Results
and the Department has not made any
changes to the Preliminary Results, we
have not prepared a Decision
Memorandum for these final results. For
further details of our findings, see the
Preliminary Results.
Weighted–average
Exporter/manufacturer margin percentage
Indorama Chemicals
(Thailand) Ltd. ........... 0.39*
*This is a de minimis rate.
Assessment Rates
The Department has determined, and
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
(‘‘CBP’’) shall assess, antidumping
duties on all appropriate entries covered
by this review. The Department intends
1 On August 30, 2006, the Department published
a notice of initiation for this administrative review
covering the period July 1, 2005, through June 30,
2006. See Notice of Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 71 FR
51573 (August 30, 2006). However, following the
initiation, the Department has revoked this order
effective May 4, 2006. See Furfuryl Alcohol from
Thailand; Final Results of the Second Sunset
Review of the Antidumping Duty Order and
Revocation of the Order, 72 FR 9729 (March 5,
2007). Therefore, the revised POR is now July 1,
2005 through May 3, 2006.
12OCN1