You are on page 1of 114

Structural Evaluation and Feasibility Study

Sportspark Recreational Facility


FINAL REPORT

Report Prepared by: KS Engineers, P.C

KS Engineers, P.C.

January 16, 2014


Mr. Santo Verta
Roosevelt Island Operating Corporation
591 Main Street
Roosevelt Island, NY 10044
Attention: Mr. Santo Verta
Re:

STRUCTURAL EVALUATION AND FEASIBILITY STUDY


Sportspark Recreational Facility
Contract No. 13-28436
KSE Project No. 1432

Dear Mr. Verta:


We are pleased to provide our report as specified in our agreement for the Structural Evaluation
and feasibility Study for the Sportspark Recreational Facility at Roosevelt Island, NY.
We are hereby submitting 3 copies of the Report.
The thoroughness and accuracy of all work on this project has been ensured by independent
quality control, performed by senior technical and management staff.
We wish to express our appreciation to the Roosevelt Island Operating Corporation and to
thank your staff for the cooperation afforded us during the performance of the project. Please
do not hesitate to call me at 973-623-2999 if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
KS Engineers, P.C.

George Assis, Ph. D., P.E.


Project Manager

KS Engineers, P.C.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
KS ENGINEERS, P.C., (KSE) performed an Engineering Inspection of the RIOC Sportspark
Recreational Facility, Roosevelt Island, NY, on August 30, 2013 to assess the overall physical
condition and degree of obsolescence of the buildings structure and heating and ventilation
systems. The survey was conducted to determine the overall condition of the faade, roof, and
mechanical systems/equipment and to identify structural and non-structural deficiencies.
KSEs primary task was to determine the condition of the Sportspark structure. Based on the
results of our inspection, we have concluded that the structural elements of this facility are in
good condition and require only minor repairs. KSE has identified Priority Projects and LongTerm Projects which are itemized in Section 7.0 - Cost analysis and Section 8.0 - Feasibility
analysis followed by supporting documentation in Appendices A and B. Based on our
observations and evaluation, we believe that the RIOC should consider renovating the structure
rather than replacing it for the reasons identified in the feasibility section of this report.
This inspection has revealed water infiltration as the main source of visible damage to both the
interior finishes and exterior faade failures. Therefore, we recommend priority repairs that
include the replacement of Upper and Lower Roofs, partial re-pointing of the interior parapet
masonry, replacement of the skylights and associated curbs, and the metal parapet coping.
Our next concern involves the condition of the masonry faade along the south elevation. The
irregularity of the surface brick is an indication of attachment failure caused by the
aforementioned water infiltration and resulting corrosion. KSE has evaluated the cantilevered
wall sections at the Natatorium and Gym locations. We recommend removal of the masonry
faade brick and CMU infill and replacement with a translucent panel system. This material
will provide natural lighting and provide the added benefit of complying with green, LEED
requirements. Due to the reduced loads on the pre-cast concrete spandrel, the tubular steel
support columns can be removed.
The remainder of interior and exterior repairs has been prioritized in the Appendices. KSE has
also compared our findings with the previous 2008 inspection report to aid in determining the
degree of increased or stabilized deterioration noted. The Appendices provide various cost
estimates and we have also identified individual projects for your consideration.
The Sportspark is a two-story, 74,254 square foot facility which was completed in 1977. The
original, masonry two-story facade at the Sportspark is in fair condition and illustrates signs of
masonry veneer delamination. The east and west elevations are dual-level due to the undulating
site terrain. These facades are in good to poor condition with signs of material delamination
and control joint deterioration. There are several areas of faade veneer adhesion failure and
other areas where repairs have been made. The veneer surface has been removed on an entire
upper faade section at the north elevation and has been resurfaced with a painted, metal panel
system. Galvanized steel tubes have been installed at mid-points at the cantilevered section
along the south elevation between the reinforced concrete columns. This installation was
completed as a precautionary measure to provide support to a deflecting masonry veneer
relieving angle. Generally, all building control/expansion joints are deteriorated and in poor

KS Engineers, P.C.

condition. Additionally, the masonry facade veneer illustrates signs of attachment failure at
various parapet locations as well as all elevations.
The interior Architectural deficiencies consist of deteriorated finishes, damaged and missing
acoustical ceiling elements, damaged plumbing fixtures and appurtenances. The majority of
interior deficiencies noted in this report appear to be connected to use and age. Exterior issues
consist of or involve three of the buildings major components; the roof, the faade/windowwalls, and mechanical equipment. This report identifies those deficiencies and provides an
approximate degree of obsolescence and recommended repairs with associated budget costs. It
is recommended that repairs be scheduled according to the recommended priority categories
noted since many of the deficiencies are linked and result from a single source.
Deficiencies associated with the exterior site include incorrect grade slope, missing or damaged
concrete curb and walkways and concrete surface deterioration. ADA ramp condition is not
included or addressed in this report. Most of the grass areas adjacent to and extending from the
building slope away from the foundation. The concrete walkways adjacent to the Sportspark
Facility appear to be in good condition but are expected to require periodic maintenance and
replacement.
In general, no significant signs of structural distress or excessive deflection were observed
within the major load bearing members; including cast-in-place/pre-cast (CIP/PC) columns and
long span pre-cast double tees. However, moderate structural deficiencies were observed at
isolated locations.
Water stains and moderate deterioration were noted at the underside of the roof diaphragm.
Hairline to moderate cracks and spallings were noted within the interior and exterior concrete
slabs and the non-bearing concrete masonry unit (CMU) walls for both the first and second
floors. Minor deterioration, spalling and abrasion within the reinforced concrete (RC) columns,
specifically at the south elevation, are evident.
The roof inspection has revealed numerous deficiencies and has provided background
information on the installed materials and expected life spans. The roof has three distinct
sections and has been surveyed as such. The roof system on Sections 1 and 2, the lower roofs,
is a Built-Up Roof (BUR), over 2 of insulation over concrete decking. The age of these roof
sections appears to be original to the building construction and is estimated at 36 years.
Deteriorated roof membrane and un-sealed, metal parapet coping joints were observed. Urgent
repairs, annual inspections and regular maintenance may extend the life of this material by
several years but full replacement is recommended from a life cycle cost analysis.
Roof Section 3, the upper roof, is a ballasted EPDM, single-ply membrane roof over the
original BUR roof and insulation over Tectum plank and concrete roof decking. This material
was installed over the central building section. The age of these roof sections is estimated at 28
years. Recommended repairs, annual inspections and regular maintenance may extend the life
of this material however, only immediate repairs are recommended and this roof should be
replaced in 2013.

KS Engineers, P.C.

The electrical system and components were functional and observed in satisfactory condition.
Branch circuit panelboards with molded case circuit breaker devices are located throughout the
facility. As with the main distribution equipment, the panelboards are original to the building
and are approximately 36+ years old. Generally, these panelboards are in satisfactory condition.
Life expectancy for this type of equipment is 40+years. However, remote panelboards subject
to varying interior environmental conditions are corroded and near the end of their life
expectancy.
We recommend that an infrared survey be conducted of all major electrical equipment
including all main & distribution switchboards, and all branch circuit panelboards to identify
any issues that require remediation. We also recommend that an electrical maintenance
company be brought in to perform maintenance on this equipment in accordance with NEMA
guidelines.
Lighting systems throughout the facility consist of mainly fluorescent and incandescent fixtures
in the general and utility areas and Metal Halide HID fixtures in the pool and gym areas. In
general most of the existing lighting installation is in poor condition. Most public areas are
poorly lit. Fixtures are both inappropriate to their installed locations and not energy efficient
units. We recommend that the lighting systems be upgraded with modern energy-efficient
fixtures to improve the performance and reduce operating costs.
The Sportspark is served by various air handlers with hot water coils. Additional heating is
provided by hot water finned tube convectors located mostly in corridors, stairwells, and
locker/toilet rooms. Steam has been provided by an off-site Central Plant which will be
discontinued in October 2013 according to information received from the RIOC Facilities
Department. The RIOC is currently planning for the installation of temporary boilers located
on-site. Cooling is only provided to the lobby, offices, and squash courts via an air handler with
a DX cooling coil and outside air-cooled condensing unit.
Pumps, tanks, and heat exchangers are original to the building and, visually, appear to be
functioning satisfactorily. Equipment throughout the pump room is corroded with deteriorated
or missing insulation. We recommend replacement of all equipment and piping in this room.
The adjacencies of intake and exhaust fans violate code and the fans should be repositioned.
Air handlers are original to the building and appear to be in need of maintenance or repair. All
air filters were dirty and need to be replaced. Miscellaneous equipment such as motorized
intake louver dampers are broken and disconnected. We recommended replacement of the unit
serving the pool area with a proper fresh air de-humidifying unit. A dehumidifier will provide
proper humidity control to help prevent mold, mildew and moisture from ruining the building
structure and also maintain desirable comfort levels.
We recommend that all existing air handling units be replaced with new since they appear to be
at the end of their useful life cycle. We also recommend conversion from existing pneumatic
controls to digital.
City water and steam presently enter the building from below ground in the basement
mechanical room adjacent to the pool filtration room. The city water is piped to a steam water

KS Engineers, P.C.

heat exchanger where it is converted to domestic hot water. The city water and domestic hot
water are piped throughout the building to serve toilet rooms, showers, sinks, water coolers and
hose bibs.
Sanitary and vent piping serving plumbing fixtures is piped through underground chases. The
routing of the piping could not be observed. The sanitary and storm piping that was visually
observed appeared to be in satisfactory condition. We recommend that all underground sanitary
piping be visually inspected using a camera to determine the existence of any obstructions. The
plumbing systems were generally in good condition with some exceptions that are noted in this
report.
Plumbing fixtures observed in restrooms and locker rooms appear to be functional and in
satisfactory condition. Although several projects have been completed since the previous 2008
report to install ADA compliant fixtures and shower stall equipment, the majority of the
facilities and components within the Sportspark are non-compliant. A detailed description and
explanation of violations by location is contained in this report. We recommend a complete
analysis of restroom and shower areas in consideration of renovations to comply with ADA.
The report contains conclusions concerning the causes of the noted deterioration and
recommendations for the rehabilitation of the components and elements of the building. The
repair procedures contained in the recommendation section of the report outline the general
extent of the required rehabilitation work. The presentation of these conceptual repairs does not
preclude the necessity of performing further investigation and preliminary design work for the
purpose of establishing the complete scope of work and the final rehabilitation design.

KS Engineers, P.C.

ROOSEVELT ISLAND OPERATING CORPORATION


SPORTSPARK RECREATION FACILITY
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Item

Page No.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................. 1


TABLE OF CONTENTS .................................................................................................... 5
LIST OF PHOTOGRAPHS.7
INDEX OF DRAWINGS .................................................................................................. 13
LOCATION MAP ............................................................................................................. 14
SCOPE OF WORK, INSPECTION PROCEDURE, AND TERMINOLOGY
A. SCOPE OF WORK ..................................................................................................... 15
B. INSPECTION PROCEDURE/METHODOLOGY.15
C. DEFINITIONS OF RECOMMENDATION CATEGORIES ..................................... 16
D. RATING CRITERIA................................................................................................... 17
E. INSPECTION TERMINOLOGY. ...................................................................... 17
INSPECTION FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
1.0 RIOC Sportspark Recreational Facility
1.1 Description ........................................................................................................... 19
1.2 Overall Condition .................................................................................................. 19
2.0 Structural ................................................................................................................. 20
2.1 Description ........................................................................................................... 20
2.2 Superstructure ....................................................................................................... 20
2.3 Foundation ............................................................................................................ 22
2.4 Floor Slabs ............................................................................................................ 22
2.5 Structural Photographs ......................................................................................... 23
3.0 Mechanical ............................................................................................................... 32
3.1 Description ........................................................................................................... 32
3.2 Boilers and Pumps ................................................................................................ 32
3.3 Air Handlers ......................................................................................................... 33
3.4 Exhaust Fans ......................................................................................................... 34
3.5 Mechanical Photographs ...................................................................................... 36
4.0 Electrical / Fire Alarm ............................................................................................ 46
4.1 Description ........................................................................................................... 46
4.2 Electrical Switchboards and Panelboards ............................................................. 46

KS Engineers, P.C.

ROOSEVELT ISLAND OPERATING CORPORATION


SPORTSPARK RECREATION FACILITY
4.3 Lighting Systems .................................................................................................. 47
4.4 Wiring Systems .................................................................................................... 48
4.5 Fire Alarms ........................................................................................................... 48
4.6 Electrical Photographs .......................................................................................... 49
5.0 Plumbing .................................................................................................................. 68
5.1 Description ........................................................................................................... 68
5.2 Sanitary / Storm .................................................................................................... 68
5.3 Domestic Hot Water and Cold Water ................................................................... 68
5.4 Pool Filtration System .......................................................................................... 69
5.5 Pumps ................................................................................................................... 69
5.6 Fixtures ................................................................................................................. 70
5.7 Sprinklers .............................................................................................................. 74
5.8 Plumbing Photographs .......................................................................................... 75
6.0 Roofing ...................................................................................................................... 90
6.1 Description: Sportspark Upper Roof Area ............................................................ 90
6.2 Upper Roof Area Photographs ............................................................................. 93
6.3 Description: Sportspark Lower Roof Area ........................................................... 98
6.4 Lower Roof Area Photographs ........................................................................... 100
7.0 Cost Analysis .......................................................................................................... 105
8.0 Feasibility Analysis ................................................................................................ 106
APPENDICES
Projects Cost Estimate .............................................................................................. A-1
Replacement Cost EstimateB-1
Reference DrawingsC-1

KS Engineers, P.C.

ROOSEVELT ISLAND OPERATING CORPORATION


SPORTSPARK RECREATION FACILITY

LIST OF PHOTOGRAPHS (Structural)


Photo No.

Description

Page No.

S-1

Light Gauge, Metal Panel Assembly at North Elevation Facade.


23

S-2

Water Stains at Upper Roof, Interior...................................................................


23

S-3

Water Stains, Underside of Roof Diaphragm...24

S-4

Typical Concrete Spall..24

S-5

Vertical/Horizontal Cracks at North Elevation, Exterior..25

S-6

Hairline Cracks at Concrete Floor Slab.


25

S-7

Typical Cracking in Non-Bearing, Interior CMU Wall....26

S-8

Typical Spall in Reinforced Concrete Column...


26

S-9

Typical Spall in Exterior Reinforced Concrete Column Base.27

S-10

Spall and Exposed Reinforcement at Exterior RC Column, South Elevation


27

S-11

Cracks at CMU Infill Wall, Interior Natatorium..28

S-12

Cracks at Supporting PC Header, Interior Natatorium..


28

S-13

Structural Steel Tubes Installed at Mid-Span, Exterior South Elevation.


29

S-14

Structural Steel Tubes Anchored to PC Header29

S-15

Typical Cracking/Spalls at Parapet Interior..30

S-16

Typical Cracking and Deteriorated Mortar at Parapet Interior..


30

S-17

Moderate Cracking at Floor Slab, Natatorium Interior..


31

S-18

Moderate Cracking/Spalls at Interior Floor Slab..31

Photo No.

LIST OF PHOTOGRAPHS (Mechanical)


Description

Page No.

M-1

Typical Exhaust Fan, Lower Roof 36

M-2

Pumps and Piping, Pump Room.... 36

M-3

Steam Piping, Pump Room 37

M-4

Typical Fin Tube Convector, Lobby. 37

M-5

Hot Water Pumps, Pump Room..38

M-6

Typical Hot Water Coil, Piping Configuration, East Mechanical Room


38

KS Engineers, P.C.

ROOSEVELT ISLAND OPERATING CORPORATION


SPORTSPARK RECREATION FACILITY
M-7

Expansion Tank, Pump Room.


39

M-8

Exhaust Fan and Fresh Air Intake, Upper Roof............................ 39

M-9

Spiral Ductwork with Supply Grilles, Gymnasium40

M-10

Supply Registers at Windows, South Elevation, Natatorium


40

M-11

Supply Registers at Window, North Elevation, Natatorium.. 41

M-12

Control Panel, East Mechanical Room.


41

M-13

Typical Air Handling Unit, West Mechanical Room.42

M-14

Typical Ceiling Diffuser, Mens Locker Room.


42

M-15

Outdoor Condensing Unit for Office Air Handler, Lower Roof 43

M-16

Outdoor Condensing Unit for Center Lobby Unit, Upper Roof.43

M-17

Typical Air Handling Unit Air Filters- Dirty, Mechanical Room..


44

M-18

Outside Air Intake Damper Motor with Broken Linkage, East Mech. Room.. 44

M-19

Typical Exhaust Grille, Mens Locker Room... 45

M-20

Exhaust Duct- Rusted, Pool Filtration Room..45

Photo No.

LIST OF PHOTOGRAPHS (Electrical)


Description

Page No.

E-1

Main Switchboard, Ground Floor Electrical Room.. 50

E-2

Distribution Switchboard, Ground Floor Electrical Room...


50

E-3

Distribution Switchboard, Ground Floor Electrical Room.


51

E-4

Automatic Transfer Switch, Ground Floor Electrical Room.

E-5

Automatic Transfer Switch Interior, Ground Floor Electrical Room..


52

E-6

85kw Diesel Generator, Second Floor Mechanical Room... 52

E-7

Typical Second Floor Lighting Installation. 53

E-8

Typical Branch Circuit Panelboard.

53

E-9

West Panelboard, Second Floor Mechanical Room

54

E-10

Panelboard SR, Ground Floor Equipment Room.

54

E-11

Panelboard UL, Second Floor Upper Lobby. 55

E-12

HID Lighting, Gymnasium 55

E-13

HID Lighting, Natatorium..

KS Engineers, P.C.

51

56

ROOSEVELT ISLAND OPERATING CORPORATION


SPORTSPARK RECREATION FACILITY

E-14

Typical Lobby Track Lighting and Recessed Down-lighting.


56

E-15

Typical Fluorescent Lighting Fixture, Egg Crate Diffuser.57

E-16

Pool Corridor Lighting Fixtures..57

E-17

Typical Lighting Fixtures in Shower Rooms..

E-18

Wiring to Typical Second Floor Mechanical Room Light Fixture.58

E-19

Pool Filter Room Lighting Fixtures, Ground Floor...


59

E-20

Typical Corridor Egress Lighting Fixture with Emergency Lighting Heads...


59

E-21

Exterior Lighting Fixtures, East Faade ..60

E-22

Open Junction Box, Second Floor East Mechanical Room.. 60

E-23

Conduit Penetration through Building Exterior.


61

E-24

Typical Receptacle below Sink. 61

E-25

Typical Receptacle, Locker Room... 62

E-26

Pool Filter Room Conduits..

E-27

Corrosion of Device Box, Pool Filter Room, Ground Floor.. 63

E-28

Corrosion of Electrical Components, Pool Filter Room, Ground Floor..


63

E-29

Exposed wiring, Pool Filter Room.


64

E-30

Open Junction Box / Exposed Wiring, Pool Filter Room...


64

E-31

Exposed Wiring, Pool Filter Room....

65

E-32

Open / Missing Junction Box at Roof Parapet...

65

E-33

Fire Alarm Control Panel, East Lobby...


66

E-34

Typical Fire Alarm Pull Station and Signaling Device.


66

E-35

Typical Duct Smoke Detector.. 67

E-36

Missing Smoke Detector, Lower Rear Elevator Lobby. 67

Photo No.

LIST OF PHOTOGRAPHS (Plumbing)


Description

58

62

Page No.

P-1

Building services entrance Basement Mechanical Room


75

P-2

Roof Drains ...

P-3

Domestic water heater exchanger Basement Mechanical Room .


76

KS Engineers, P.C.

75

ROOSEVELT ISLAND OPERATING CORPORATION


SPORTSPARK RECREATION FACILITY

P-4

Domestic water heat exchanger Basement Mechanical Room ..

76

P-5

Damaged insulation Basement Mechanical Room..

77

P-6

Dual steam control valves for pool heat exchanger Bsmt Mech Rm..

77

P-7

Damaged insulation Basement Mechanical Room


78

P-8

Pool water filtration unit assembly


78

P-9

Pool heat exchanger Primary .. 79

P-10

Pool heat exchanger - Secondary..


79

P-11

Pool water circulation pump ..

80

P-12

Regular height water closet Lower Level west .

80

P-13

Urinals Lower Level west ..

81

P-14

Lavatory Lower Level west.

81

P-15

ADA height water closet Lower Level east

82

P-16

Pool locker room metering showers Lower Level west.

82

P-17

Pool locker room toilet stalls Lower Level west 83

P-18

Pool locker room water closet Lower Level west.


83

P-19

Pool locker room lavatory sinks Lower Level west.


84

P-20

Locker Room shower Lower Level east ....

P-21

Pool locker room ADA shower Lower Level west.85

P-22

Pool locker room ADA shower Lower Level west.


85

P-23

Pool office toilet room Lower Level west..

86

P-24

Pool locker room shower stalls Lower Level west..

86

P-25

Upper level mens toilet room Arts/Crafts..

87

P-26

Upper level mens toilet room Arts/Crafts.

87

P-27

Mens ADA toilet room Lower Level west.

88

P-28

Womens ADA toilet room Lower Level west..


88

P-29

Dual level water cooler ....

KS Engineers, P.C.

84

89

10

ROOSEVELT ISLAND OPERATING CORPORATION


SPORTSPARK RECREATION FACILITY

Photo No.

LIST OF PHOTOGRAPHS (Roofing- Upper Level)


Description

Page No.

R-1

Northwest Corner of upper roof area....... 93

R-2

North, Center Section of upper roof area...93

R-3

South, Center Section of upper roof area.... 94

R-4

Skylights at upper roof area, looking southeast.. 94

R-5

Skylights at upper roof area, looking southwest...

94

R-6

Typical rooftop HVAC equipment support framing at upper roof area....

94

R-7

Typical rooftop vent installation detail at upper roof area .......

94

R-8

Typical drain at upper roof area........

94

R-9

Typical metal coping condition at upper roof area, looking west.

95

R-10

Manufacturers stamp date visible at upper roof area...

95

R-11

Interior view of concrete roof deck typical throughout.95

R-12

Example of punctures, openings in roof membrane 95

R-13

Open joints in roof membrane at rooftop vent flashing....


95

R-14

Open joints in roof membrane at rooftop vent curb... 95

R-15

Loose rooftop plumbing penetration vent flashing...

96

R-16

Typical punctures and openings in roof flashings....

96

R-17

Membrane bridging and pulling away from parapet wall.

96

R-18

Deteriorated pitch pockets at utility penetrations......

96

R-19

Damaged skylight section at upper roof area. 96

R-20

Typical condition of skylight frame and acrylic glazing. 96

R-21

Open joints in parapet copings... 97

R-22

Metal copings at north parapet, looking west.......

R-23

Open joints at counter flashings, parapet interior.. 97

R-24

Open masonry joints at thru wall counter flashings 97

R-25

Tree growth adjacent to upper roof parapet, north side. 97

R-26

Missing drain hardware, typical throughout... 97

KS Engineers, P.C.

97

11

ROOSEVELT ISLAND OPERATING CORPORATION


SPORTSPARK RECREATION FACILITY

Photo No.

LIST OF PHOTOGRAPHS (Roofing- Lower Levels)


Description

Page No.

R-27 View of Lower west roof section, looking west..

100

R-28 View of Lower west roof section, looking north..........

100

R-29 View of Lower west roof section, looking south 101


R-30 View of Lower east roof section, looking south 101
R-31 View of Lower East roof section, looking north 101
R-32 Typical wall flashings and counter flashing, east and west roof sections.

101

R-33 Typical condition of metal coping system, east and west roof sections.

101

R-34 Typical roof top equipment located on both east and west roof sections

101

R-35 Typical roof drain condition located on both lower roof sections........

102

R-36 Deteriorated masonry joints at parapet above counter flashing...

102

R-37 Typical condition of flashing and counter flashing.........

102

R-38 Open masonry joints at thru-wall counter flashing.

102

R-39 Deteriorated masonry joints at thru-wall counter flashing, south side.

102

R-40 Deteriorated flashings at vent curbs.

102

R-41 Open flashings at rooftop vent curbs.. 103


R-42 Deteriorated utility penetration seals at curb sidewall.

103

R-43 Open penetrations at curb sidewall..

103

R-44 Corroded drain hardware at all roof drains........ 103


R-45 Deteriorated pitch pockets, typical........

103

R-46 Damaged pitch pockets at rooftop vents........ 103


R-47 Open joints at parapet counter flashing

104

R-48 Deteriorated drain strainers, typical..

104

R-49 Undersized or improper drain strainers, typical....

104

R-50 Missing supports/dunnage at rooftop AC unit... 104


R-51 Open utility penetration at masonry parapet wall

KS Engineers, P.C.

104

12

ROOSEVELT ISLAND OPERATING CORPORATION


SPORTSPARK RECREATION FACILITY

INDEX OF DRAWINGS
Dwg. No.
1
2
3
4
5
6

Description

Page No.

Existing Lower East Floor Plan ........................................................................ C-1


Existing Lower West Floor Plan ...................................................................... C-2
Existing Upper East Floor Plan ........................................................................ C-3
Existing Upper West Floor Plan ....................................................................... C-4
Existing Roof Plan ............................................................................................ C-5
Existing North, South, East, West Elevations ...C-6

KS Engineers, P.C.

13

ROOSEVELT ISLAND OPERATING CORPORATION


SPORTSPARK RECREATION FACILITY

LOCATION MAP

RIOC
Sportspark Facility

KS Engineers, P.C.

14

ROOSEVELT ISLAND OPERATING CORPORATION


SPORTSPARK RECREATION FACILITY

SCOPE OF WORK, INSPECTION PROCEDURE AND TERMINOLOGY


A.

SCOPE OF WORK

KS ENGINEERS, P.C., performed an Engineering Inspection of the RIOC Sportspark


Recreational Facility, Roosevelt Island, NY, on August 30, 2013 to assess the overall physical
condition and degree of obsolescence of the buildings structure and heating and ventilation
systems. KSE inspected the interior and exterior of the Sportspark Facility including the
following:
Structural Integrity
Heating and Ventilation Systems
Electrical systems (Cursory Overview)
Plumbing Systems (Cursory Review)
Roofing Systems (Cursory Overview)
Lighting (Cursory Overview)
A visual inspection and a partial hands-on inspection of accessible areas were performed as
deemed necessary. The hands-on inspection was performed at various locations at grade, along
the exterior face of the building on the north, south, east, and west faces and a visual from
overhead at roof level. The inspection also included the interior spaces, including areas above
the suspended ceilings, the roof, and mechanical equipment.
B.

INSPECTION PROCEDURE / METHODOLOGY

While surveying a building, our inspectors endeavor to maintain a pragmatic approach to the
methodology of project identification and priority designation. That is, the inspectors try to remain
as impartial and objective as possible in making decisions, thus minimizing personal preferences
in design or financial strategies.
Information contained in this report was obtained by means of interviews, cursory document
review and on-site visual inspection only. The report is not intended to be an exhaustive research
of all potential problems that may exist. Inspection of an existing property requires that certain
assumptions be made regarding existing conditions. Some of these assumptions may not be
verifiable without additional expenses for destructive testing, which was outside the scope of this
inspection. Some issues discussed may require further study to fully assess their magnitude and
costs. Solutions rendered are based on the professional experience of KSE staff and industry
standards and may not reflect all potential solutions available.
CODE COMPLIANCE ISSUES
A formal code study of the subject building was not included in the scope of this inspection.
Where obvious safety hazards were discovered during the inspection of subject buildings,
corrective actions were proposed and included in this report.

KS Engineers, P.C.

15

ROOSEVELT ISLAND OPERATING CORPORATION


SPORTSPARK RECREATION FACILITY

INFORMATION GATHERING
KSE staff members utilized the following methods to gather information which is used to analyze
construction, renovation, and maintenance projects.
Engineers make inspections of the building included in the scope of this inspection. Each
building element receives a thorough visual inspection. No destructive testing was
performed. Only those items readily viewable were inspected however, our inspectors did
view conditions above suspended ceilings. The inspectors take note of the composition
and condition of specific structural, electrical and mechanical systems.
Facility maintenance staff is interviewed to gain insight from their knowledge and
familiarity of the building and its systems.
Available existing drawings and reports are reviewed.
Digital photographs are taken of equipment and/or in areas in need of repair or improvements and
to document existing conditions. Photos are cataloged for future reference.

The masonry-faced exterior of the building was inspected hands-on at multiple locations. The
remaining areas were inspected visually. The areas above the metal-splined ceiling were inspected
visually and were completed from the floor level.
Field notes were recorded on plans, sketches and tables. Photographs were taken of significant
and typical deficiencies.
C.

DEFINITIONS OF RECOMMENDATION CATEGORIES

Hands-on
Inspection

Close-up inspection from no further away than arms length


where the member or element can be physically touched.

Visual
Inspection

The inspection from a reasonable distance of a member or


element where initial determination of the condition can be made.

Three categories of recommendations are identified and defined as follows:


Priority 1: Urgent-High: Address urgently or schedule soon. These include safety or code
violations, critical equipment that is not functional or close to failure. Work in the category is
generally scheduled for execution in the first year. Requires urgent action including possible
closing of the structure or areas affected until interim remedial measures, such as shoring or
removal of potentially unsafe structures (or elements), can be implemented.
Priority 2: Medium: Schedule soon or in the foreseeable future. These include items needing
attention in the near term. Conditions for which no immediate action may be required or for
which urgent action has been completed, but further investigations, design and implementation
of interim or long-term repairs should be undertaken on a priority basis, i.e., taking precedence
over all other scheduled work.
Priority 3: Low: Less important items related to aesthetic or minor performance issues, or
issues related to systems or equipment that will reach the end of its useful life cycle within a 5-

KS Engineers, P.C.

16

ROOSEVELT ISLAND OPERATING CORPORATION


SPORTSPARK RECREATION FACILITY
10 year period. Conditions requiring further investigation or remedial work, which can be
undertaken as part of a scheduled maintenance program, other scheduled project, or routine
facility maintenance, depending on the action required.
D. RATING CRITERIA
Terms used to describe the condition of a building structural system or component are listed
and defined below. When the term is applied to an overall structure or system, this does not
indicate that all elements of the structure or system are in the same condition.
Adequate

Component or material has little or no damage or deterioration. Functions as


originally intended or designed for and meet current design and code standards.
Appearance does not detract from the surroundings. Not anticipated to need
correction in the next 5-10 years.

Substandard Component or material has an acceptable level of damage or deterioration for its
age. Overall functions as intended but some portions may be deficient to a
degree. May not meet current design or code standards but it does not pose an
unacceptable risk to life safety. Appearance may detract from the surroundings
in isolated areas. Anticipated corrective action needed within the next 1-5 years.
The component or system is sound and performing its function, although it
shows signs of wear and may require some minor repairs, mostly routine.
Deficient

Component or material has an unacceptable level of deterioration or damage.


Does not function as intended to a large extent or is obsolete. Does not meet
current design or code standards and may pose an unacceptable risk to life
safety. Appearance is overall poor and is considered unacceptable. Anticipated
corrective action needed within 0-1 years. The component or system cannot be
relied upon to continue to perform its original function without immediate
and/or priority repair.

E. INSPECTION TERMINOLOGY
The following terms are typically used during inspection to describe the condition of the structural
members.
1) STEEL MEMBERS
a) Corrosion
Minor (or Light) light surface rust.
Moderate Rust that is loose and flaking with some pitting. This scaling or
exfoliation can be removed with some effort by use of a scraper or chipping
hammer. Element exhibits measurable but not significant loss of section.
Severe Heavy stratified rust or rust scales with extensive pitting. Removal
requires significant effort and may require mechanical means. Significant loss of
section.

KS Engineers, P.C.

17

ROOSEVELT ISLAND OPERATING CORPORATION


SPORTSPARK RECREATION FACILITY
b) Pack Rust Rust collected between two interfacing surfaces, usually two steel plates.
Pack rust can be minor, moderate, or severe as described above. Pack rust can severely
deform the steel members due to the expansive nature of rust.
c) Pitting Formation of cavities due to corrosion. Minor, moderate and severe pitting
categories are used based upon depth and density of cavities.
Minor Typically less than 1/4 inch diameter and 1/32 inch deep.
Moderate 1/4 inch to 1/2 inch diameter and up to 1/8 inch deep.
Severe Greater than 1/2 inch diameter and over 1/8 inch deep.
2) CONCRETE MEMBERS
a) Cracking A separation into two or more parts with a space between the fractured
concrete surfaces.
Hairline- Crack width less than 1/32 inch.
Fine Crack width between 1/32 inch and 1/16 inch.
Medium Crack width between 1/16 inch and 1/8 inch.
Wide Crack width greater than 1/8 inch.
The above definitions for cracks can be modified, depending on the type of structural
element. Other terminology, such as map cracking, pattern cracking, etc., may be used as
appropriate.
b) Efflorescence A white deposit caused by crystallization of soluble salts brought to
the surface by moisture leaching through concrete.
c) Delamination A layered separation of the concrete. When a delaminated area of
concrete is struck (sounded) with a hammer, a hollow sound will be emitted.
d) Leaching The dissolution and washing away of the calcium hydroxide in concrete. The
moisture enters the concrete through exposed cracks in the surface.
e) Spall - A roughly circular, oval, or elongated depression in the surface of a concrete
element caused by separation of a portion of the surface concrete.
Small (Pop-out) Less than 6 inches in diameter and 1 inch deep.
Medium Between 6 inches and 12 inches in diameter and up to 2 inches deep.
Large Over 12 inches in diameter and any depth.
f) Scaling The gradual loss of surface mortar and aggregates.
Light Scaling Loss of surface mortar up to 1/4 inch deep.
Medium Scaling Loss of surface mortar between 1/4 inch and 1/2 inchdeep,
including loss between large aggregate.
Heavy Scaling Loss of mortar greater than 1/2 inch in depth significantly
exposing large aggregate.
g) Hollow area An area of concrete which emits a hollow sound when struck with a
hammer and indicates the existence of a fracture plane beneath the surface.
h) Honeycomb Typically small pocket voids formed by the entrapment of air during the
placement of the concrete.

KS Engineers, P.C.

18

ROOSEVELT ISLAND OPERATING CORPORATION


SPORTSPARK RECREATION FACILITY

INSPECTION FINDINGS CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS


1.0 RIOC SPORTSPARK RECREATION FACILITY
1.1

Description

The Sportspark Recreation Facility, Roosevelt Island, NY, was originally opened in 1977 and
renovated in 1997. The 30,000 SF structure consists of a 2-story east wing with administrative
offices, restrooms, and lobby on the first level and kitchen, cafeteria, restrooms, and classrooms at
the second level. The 1-story west wing contains classrooms, conference area, student services,
and restrooms. There is a full basement beneath the first floor with exception to approximately
5,000 SF beneath the northeast addition. The northeast addition was constructed with no basement
as a slab-on-grade.
Each floor of the 2-story east wing comprises approximately 6,500 square ft. of space including
the area for elevators, stairs, utility rooms and bathrooms. The below grade basement extends
beneath the first floor of the building and consists of approximately 18,500 square ft. The first
floor roof level is accessed through a door in the kitchen on the second floor. There is access to the
second floor roof via a ladder at the exterior, first floor roof. There are 270 surface parking spaces
at various lots surrounding the building.
The building facade consists of exposed aggregate stucco, aluminum and glass window walls and
Exterior Insulation Finishing System or EIFS.
1.2

Overall Condition

Facade: The failing north faade masonry veneer has been removed since the 2008 inspection
report and replaced with a painted aluminum, metal panel system. The CMU masonry back-up
parapet walls were not visible at the time of this inspection. Therefore, their condition could not
be evaluated. Recommendations regarding destructive probes to determine the presence of
anchoring will be addressed in the Structural Section of this report. The south, east, and west
parapet walls remain in fair to poor condition as noted in the previous report.
Recommendations based on further investigation to the north faade parapet will be applied to
all parapet locations. The expansion joints are misaligned in both the horizontal and vertical
direction due in part to the delamination of masonry faade veneer. The expansion joints should
be re-established following faade restoration.
Glazed Windows/Walls: Large aluminum/glass window walls are located at the north
elevation entrances. The windows throughout the facility are single-glazed and do not comply
with the present NYS Energy Code. Recommendations include replacement with insulated
units. Vaulted, acrylic skylights remain in fair to poor condition and should be replaced. Water
staining at the interior illustrates evidence of water infiltration through the skylight units and
curbs. We recommend the installation of Kalwall products that are highly insulating,
translucent structural composite sandwich panels that diffuse light-transmission and provide
structural integrity. Kalwall products are ideally suited for recreational facility applications.

KS Engineers, P.C.

19

ROOSEVELT ISLAND OPERATING CORPORATION


SPORTSPARK RECREATION FACILITY

Interior Walls: The interior CMU walls are covered with paint, and ceramic tile finishes.
There are also several areas of painted gypsum wall board partitions. The interior areas along
the exterior walls illustrate water infiltration. Restroom and Locker Room locations have areas
of loose or missing ceramic wall tiles as a result of fixture mounting partition attachment, or
general use failure issues. The innermost partitions illustrate finish issues that appear to be
cosmetic or as a result of normal wear-and-tear. Several repairs have been completed since the
2008 inspection that include the replacement and/or re-attachment of ceramic tile associated
with ADA compliance renovation projects.
Locker Rooms / Restrooms: The previous report noted ADA accessibility issues including
entry clearances, plumbing fixture types, heights, and controls. Several of these issues have
since been resolved based on projects completed since the report was issued in 2008. Our
inspection noted the installation of ADA shower and toilet stalls including fixture and controls
accommodations. No changes were noted in overall entry/exit clearances. The Plumbing
Section of this report will address ADA issues in more depth. Walls, flooring, ceilings and
locker room fixtures are in fair to poor condition. Full renovation to these facilities is
recommended.
Doors and Hardware: The previous report noted ADA issues with regard to door hardware.
Replacement of doors and hardware is recommended.

2.0

STRUCTURAL

2.1 Description
The existing structural drawings, containing foundation, and superstructures and details, were
provided to KSE prior to our visit. According to the drawings, the subject building was
designed and constructed circa late 1977 by Geiger Berger Associates, P.C. Reinforcing
designs recommended by BL Companies in 2008 has also been in place prior to our inspection.
2.2 Superstructure
The Sportspark facility is a low-rise reinforced concrete (RC) construction comprised of castin-place (CIP) RC foundation and precast/pre-stressed concrete (PC) roof diaphragm.
According to the existing structural drawings, a minimum 3,500 psi and 5,000 psi strength
concrete is used for the CIP and PC structures, respectively. Non-bearing concrete masonry
block (CMU) walls are used as partition as well as back-up walls behind the faade. Brick
veneer and parapet are installed encompassing the perimeter of the building, except the north
elevation where the masonry parapet has been removed and replaced with light-gage back-up
metal panel assemblies lately (See Photo S-1).
Findings:
In general, no significant signs of distress or excessive deflection was observed within the
major load bearing members; including CIP/PC columns and long span Pre-Cast double Tees.
However, moderate structural deficiencies are observed at isolated locations:
General

KS Engineers, P.C.

20

ROOSEVELT ISLAND OPERATING CORPORATION


SPORTSPARK RECREATION FACILITY
Water stains and moderate deterioration were noted at the underside of the roof diaphragm (See
Photos S-2, S-3). Hairline to moderate cracks and spalls are noted within the interior and
exterior concrete slabs and the non-bearing CMU walls for both 1st, and 2nd floors. (See Photos
S-4, S-5, S-6, S-7) Minor deterioration, spalling and abrasion within the RC columns,
specifically at the south elevation, are evident. (See Photos S-8, S-9, S-10).
South Walls
Moderate to servere cracks within the existing PC header beam over the gymnasium and
swimming pool area are evident. It should be noted that these structural deficiencies were
reported in BL Companys report, dated March 25, 2008. While the reinforcing design with
additional column supports installed at the mid-span are in place (See Photos S-11, S-12, S-13,
S-14), significant signs of structural cracks within the CMU infill and the supporting header are
still present.
North Wall (1st Level)
Severe cracks extending horizontally along the exterior concrete slab and vertically along the
non-bearing masonry facade at on one section of the north elevation were observed.
South Parapets
According to BLs report and recommendation, the existing roof parapet extending off of the
exterior concrete roof edges may have not been structurally doweled into the concrete
spandrels. In the lack of readily access to the parapet to spandrel connections, the said
condition cannot be verified during our assessment. KSEs review is limited to the visual
observation from the inside face of the parapet. Moderate to severe cracks and deteriorated
mortar are noted throughout the perimeter of the roof. (See Photos S-15, S-16).
Recommendations:
Within the roof diaphragms, where water staining exists, and/or water infiltration at the gypsum
concrete deck is evident, supplemental review and evaluation of these areas of the deck is
required. The existing Tectum deck will deteriorate when subjected to prolonged or frequent
moisture. Where the existing frames around the skylight are deteriorated, these localized areas
of the skylight supports should be replaced, with the repaired area extending between
supporting precast concrete double tees. To facilitate the delineation of water infiltration and
damage to the Tectum deck, it is recommended that a moisture survey is performed to
determine the levels of moisture and sections requiring replacement. The survey should identify
areas on the underside of the Tectum roof deck where the form board is deteriorated or possible
sagging and areas of moisture staining and wetness.
At the south elevation of the gymnasium and swimming pool area, the localized areas of
abrasion and spalling on the RC columns should be remediated. The weakened cementitious
component should be cleaned to remove all surface deterioration, the surface prepared and
patched to match the existing covers/coatings. Where the existing infill block walls have been
damaged due to excessive deflection at its supporting spandrels, it is recommended that the
entire infill block be removed and replaced with light-weight materials, such as cold-formed or
Kalwall wall system, to mitigate further deformation and potential water penetration. After the
infill removal and new wall systems in place, the supporting spandrel shall be re-exam and all
cracks and defects shall be repaired/re-pointed to recover the original surfaces.

KS Engineers, P.C.

21

ROOSEVELT ISLAND OPERATING CORPORATION


SPORTSPARK RECREATION FACILITY

In the South elevation where the existing non-bearing CMU wall and slabs are damaged, these
structural elements should be repaired or replaced as required. Where the walls and slab exhibit
moderate to severe cracks, the void should be cleaned, prepared, and re-pointed with same
strength mortar. All repair of replacement material should match the installed materials.
As for the existing parapet, it is recommended that an exhausted inspection to probe into the
wall base be performed to verify and ensure that the existing walls are secured to the existing
roof spandrel RC beams with proper dowels as required. Based on the explorative inspection
result, KSE will be able to provide more accurate assessment based on an elaborate analysis.
2.3 Foundation
Findings:
In accordance with the existing Structural drawings that were provided to KSE, the foundations
of the subject building are comprised of conventional shallow foundation utilizing spread
footings at columns and concentrated loads and continuous walls at exterior and interior walls.
At the majority of locations, the load bearing members bear directly on sound rock. Since there
are no observed signs of settlement or displacement in the building structure that can be
directly attributed to the foundations, the foundations are deemed to be good condition.
Recommendations:
N/A
2.4 Floor Slabs
According to the existing structural drawings, 5 to 8 slabs on grade were constructed as the
level one finished floor. Ten-inch and eight-inch framed slabs were installed at the second floor
to support office; class room and multiple purposes use live loads.
Findings:
Given the age of the subject facility, the condition of the floor slabs including framed slabs at
the second floor and the slab on grade (SOG) at the first level is deemed structurally
acceptable. While moderate cracks, physical damages and concrete spalls are evident, (See
Photos S-17, S-18). The magnitude of these defects is considered moderate and can be
retrofitted via cost-effective repairing/reinforcing methods.
Recommendations:
At the concrete slab on grade, where the cracking, and/or spalls, and deterioration within the
coatings or topping materials within the concrete slab on grade are aesthetically unacceptable,
pose a serviceability issue, or may be subjected to frequent wetting or exposure to moisture at
the swimming pool areas, it is recommended that these conditions be repaired.
The cracks within the concrete slab should be repaired, with the selection of the repair method
based on the use, exposure, and anticipated conditions. Where the slab is subject to live loads,
structural repair of the crack is recommended, but where it is not subject to these loading
conditions, sealing the crack is acceptable. Consideration to the provision of a sealer,
membrane, or epoxy floor coating specifically at the pool areas may be warranted to achieve
long-term maintenance goals.

KS Engineers, P.C.

22

ROOSEVELT ISLAND OPERATING CORPORATION


SPORTSPARK RECREATION FACILITY

2.5 Structural Photographs

S-1: Light Gauge, Metal Panel Assembly at North Elevation Facade.

S-2: Water Stains at Upper Roof, Interior.

KS Engineers, P.C.

23

ROOSEVELT ISLAND OPERATING CORPORATION


SPORTSPARK RECREATION FACILITY

S-3: Water Stains, Underside of Roof Diaphragm.

S-4: Typical Concrete Spall.

KS Engineers, P.C.

24

ROOSEVELT ISLAND OPERATING CORPORATION


SPORTSPARK RECREATION FACILITY

.
S-5: Vertical/Horizontal Cracks at North Elevation, Exterior.

S-6: Hairline Cracks at Concrete Floor Slab.

KS Engineers, P.C.

25

ROOSEVELT ISLAND OPERATING CORPORATION


SPORTSPARK RECREATION FACILITY

S-7: Typical Cracking in Non-Bearing, Interior CMU Wall.

S-8: Typical Spall in Reinforced Concrete Column.

KS Engineers, P.C.

26

ROOSEVELT ISLAND OPERATING CORPORATION


SPORTSPARK RECREATION FACILITY

S-9: Typical Spall in Exterior Reinforced Concrete Column Base.

S-10: Spall and Exposed Reinforcement at Exterior RC Column, South Elevation.

KS Engineers, P.C.

27

ROOSEVELT ISLAND OPERATING CORPORATION


SPORTSPARK RECREATION FACILITY

S-11: Cracks at CMU Infill Wall, Interior Natatorium.

S-12: Cracks at Supporting PC Header, Interior Natatorium.

KS Engineers, P.C.

28

ROOSEVELT ISLAND OPERATING CORPORATION


SPORTSPARK RECREATION FACILITY

S-13: Structural Steel Tubes Installed at Mid-Span, Exterior South Elevation.

S-14: Structural Steel Tubes Anchored to PC Header.

KS Engineers, P.C.

29

ROOSEVELT ISLAND OPERATING CORPORATION


SPORTSPARK RECREATION FACILITY

S-15: Typical Cracking/Spalls at Parapet Interior.

S-16: Typical Cracking and Deteriorated Mortar at Parapet Interior.

KS Engineers, P.C.

30

ROOSEVELT ISLAND OPERATING CORPORATION


SPORTSPARK RECREATION FACILITY

S-17: Moderate Cracking at Floor Slab, Natatorium Interior.

S-18: Moderate Cracking/Spalls at Interior Floor Slab.

KS Engineers, P.C.

31

ROOSEVELT ISLAND OPERATING CORPORATION


SPORTSPARK RECREATION FACILITY

3.0

MECHANICAL

3.1 Description:
The Roosevelt Island Sports Park is served by various air handlers with hot water coils. There
is additional heating done by hot water finned tube convectors located mostly in corridors,
stairwells, and locker/toilet rooms. Cooling is only provided to the lobby, offices, and squash
courts via an air handler with a DX cooling coil and outside air-cooled condensing unit.
Steam is brought to the building from an off-site boiler plant. The steam is used to heat hot
water through heat exchangers in the pump room. Hot water is circulated throughout the
building by recirculation pumps.
There are 6 exhaust fans located on the roof that are used to exhaust the locker rooms, toilet
rooms, and pool chemical room. (See Photo M-1)
The Sportspark Facility is currently designing accommodations for the installation of
temporary boilers in anticipation of the Fall 2013 disconnect from the Central Plant. Future
developments include the consideration of using Squash Court B for conversion to a permanent
Boiler Room supplying heat to the Sportspark Facility.
3.2 Boilers and Pumps
There are no boilers located in the building. City steam is supplied to the building by an outside
central plant, which was not inspected for this report. There is a pump room in the building
which contains pumps, heat exchangers, and tanks. (See Photo M-2) City steam presently
enters the building from below ground in the basement mechanical (pump) room adjacent to the
pool filtration room. (See Photo M-3) Steam is piped to the heat exchangers, which heats the
hot water circulating the building. This hot water is pumped throughout the building to the hot
water coils in the air handling units, and the various finned tube convectors. (See Photos M-4,
M-5, M-6)
The room is ventilated by bringing in fresh air and exhausting the air out through the roof. The
exhaust fans and intake vents are located on the roof.
Findings:
The pumps, tanks, and heat exchangers are original to the building and, visually, appear to be
functioning satisfactorily. All mechanical equipment throughout the pump room exhibit
corrosion and rust. The pipe insulation, which is original, is either missing, torn, or partially
hanging off of the piping in some areas.
The expansion tanks are covered in rust. (See Photo M-7)
The fresh air intake and exhaust fans on the roof are located less than 10 feet apart and are too
close together per the International Mechanical Code. (See Photo M-8) Any intake air opening
should be located 10 feet or more horizontally from any exhaust air.

KS Engineers, P.C.

32

ROOSEVELT ISLAND OPERATING CORPORATION


SPORTSPARK RECREATION FACILITY
Recommendations:
It is recommended that all equipment and piping in the pump room be replaced. At a minimum,
the existing piping, valves, strainers, unions, and insulation should be replaced from the heat
exchanger to a point where the exposed piping leaves the mechanical room.
The exhaust fans and intake opening on the roof that ventilate this space should be re-located so
that the intake openings are at least 10 feet from the exhaust fans in order to comply with the
International Mechanical Code.
3.3 Air Handlers
The air handlers are located in three different mechanical rooms. There is a mechanical room
on the east side and west side on the second floor of the building. There is an additional
mechanical room on the south side of the building.
East Mechanical Room: The east mechanical room houses three air handlers which serve the
pool and pool locker rooms. The pool unit appears to be 100% outside air and the air is
distributed over the pool swimming area by exposed spiral ductwork with supply registers. (See
Photo M-9) The air is relieved with sidewall grilles on the west side of the pool. The unit has
only a hot water coil but no cooling or dehumidification.
An additional air handler supplies air at the north and south side of the pool area directs air
towards the windows. (See Photos M-10, M-11) This unit has a return fan and is not 100%
outside air. Similarly, this unit has a hot water coil but no cooling.
The third air handler serves the pool locker rooms. This unit also appears to be 100% outside
air with a hot water coil and no cooling. An exhaust fan on the roof exhausts air from the pool
locker areas.
All of the units are controlled by a pneumatic control system. (See Photo M-12)
West Mechanical Room: The west mechanical room also has three air handlers. (See Photo
M-13) They serve the gym, locker rooms, and the office area.
The gym unit has a hot water coil for heating. Cooling is not provided. Air is distributed to the
space by exposed spiral ductwork with supply registers. Air is returned through sidewall grilles
on the west side of the gym. A return fan is used to return the air back to the unit. The motor on
the gym return fan has been recently replaced.
The unit serving the locker room also has a hot water coil for heating but no cooling. Air is
distributed to the space with ceiling diffusers. (See Photo M-14) Rooftop exhaust fans exhaust
the air. Additional heating is done by hot water finned tube.
The office area unit has hot water coil for heating and a DX cooling coil with outdoor
condensing unit for cooling. Air distribution to the space is done by ceiling diffusers and
ceiling return grilles. (See Photo M-15)
All of the units are controlled by a pneumatic control system.

KS Engineers, P.C.

33

ROOSEVELT ISLAND OPERATING CORPORATION


SPORTSPARK RECREATION FACILITY
South Mechanical Room: The south mechanical room houses the unit that serves the center of
the building, which consists for an art room, squash courts, and upper and lower lounge. This
unit has a hot water coil for heating and a DX cooling coil with outdoor condensing unit for
cooling. (See Photo M-16) The outdoor condensing unit is located on the upper roof and is a 30
ton Trane unit. Air is distributed to the space by spiral ductwork and diffusers.
Findings:
The air handlers appear to be original to the building and most appear to be in need of
maintenance or repair. The air filters in the unit were examined on all units. All of the air filters
were dirty and need to be replaced. (See Photo M-17) The motorized damper on the pool unit
air intake louver was broken and disconnected. (See Photo M-18) The fan motor belt on the air
handler serving the gym should be replaced.
It is also recommended that the existing unit serving the pool area be replaced with a proper
fresh air de-humidifying pool unit. A dehumidifier will provide proper humidity control to help
prevent mold, mildew and moisture from ruining the building structure and also maintain
desirable comfort levels.
There is a small outdoor condensing unit located on the west lower roof. This unit serves as
cooling for the office areas. Although it is operational, it was found to be deteriorating and
rusted.
The larger outdoor condensing unit, located on the upper roof, seems to be a newer unit that
replaced the original. It is in good condition.
Duct insulation is torn on most of the visible ductwork in the mechanical rooms. Ductwork in
most of spaces being served (gym, pool, etc.) appears to be clean and in good condition.
However, the locker room is of concern. All of the ceiling supply diffusers are dirty and in poor
condition. It appears the dirt on the face of the diffusers is from poorly maintained air handling
units, such as filters not being changed.
Recommendations:
It is recommended that all existing air handling units should be replaced since they appear to be
at the end of their useful life cycle. At a minimum, the units should be inspected and
refurbished with new parts as required. The units should be maintained more frequently, such
as air filter changes.
The small outdoor condensing unit on the lower roof should be replaced.
A new digital control system should also be considered since the existing pneumatic system is
original to the building.
3.4 Exhaust Fans
There are several exhaust fans located on the roof of the building. These fans serve the toilet
and locker rooms, and mechanical rooms. They appear to be original to the building. These fans
are manufactured by Fantech.

KS Engineers, P.C.

34

ROOSEVELT ISLAND OPERATING CORPORATION


SPORTSPARK RECREATION FACILITY
There is also an exhaust system serving the pool mechanical room, where the pool filtration and
heat exchangers are located. The exhaust duct is exposed and runs in the ceiling along the
length of the room.
Findings:
The exhaust fan for the Mens Locker Room, located on the lower west roof, was not operating.
It appears that the motor is no longer functioning. All other exhaust fans were found to be
operating. The exhaust grilles and ductwork that were visible in the locker room areas appeared
satisfactory. (See Photo M-19)
The exhaust duct located in the Pool Chemical/Mechanical Room was very rusted, most likely
from the moisture and chemicals in the room. (See Photo M-20)
Recommendations:
Similar to the air handling units, the exhaust fans should be replaced since most were found to
be original to the building. The exhaust fan serving the Mens Locker Room, which was not
operating, should be replaced or repaired urgently.
The exhaust duct in the Pool Chemical/Mechanical Room should be replaced aluminum or
stainless steel duct. It appears that the excess moisture and chemicals in the room rapidly
deteriorated the ductwork.

KS Engineers, P.C.

35

ROOSEVELT ISLAND OPERATING CORPORATION


SPORTSPARK RECREATION FACILITY
3.5 Mechanical Photographs

M-1: Typical Exhaust Fan, Lower Roof.

M-2: Pumps and Piping, Pump Room.

KS Engineers, P.C.

36

ROOSEVELT ISLAND OPERATING CORPORATION


SPORTSPARK RECREATION FACILITY

M-3: Steam Piping, Pump Room.

M-4: Typical Fin Tube Convector, Lobby.

KS Engineers, P.C.

37

ROOSEVELT ISLAND OPERATING CORPORATION


SPORTSPARK RECREATION FACILITY

M-5: Hot Water Pumps, Pump Room.

M-6: Typical Hot Water Coil, Piping Configuration, East Mechanical Room.

KS Engineers, P.C.

38

ROOSEVELT ISLAND OPERATING CORPORATION


SPORTSPARK RECREATION FACILITY

M-7: Expansion Tank, Pump Room.

M-8: Exhaust Fan and Fresh Air Intake, Upper Roof.

KS Engineers, P.C.

39

ROOSEVELT ISLAND OPERATING CORPORATION


SPORTSPARK RECREATION FACILITY

M-9: Spiral Ductwork with Supply Grilles, Gymnasium.

M-10: Supply Registers at Windows, South Elevation, Natatorium.

KS Engineers, P.C.

40

ROOSEVELT ISLAND OPERATING CORPORATION


SPORTSPARK RECREATION FACILITY

M-11: Supply Registers at Window, North Elevation, Natatorium.

M-12: Control Panel, East Mechanical Room.

KS Engineers, P.C.

41

ROOSEVELT ISLAND OPERATING CORPORATION


SPORTSPARK RECREATION FACILITY

M-13: Typical Air Handling Unit, West Mechanical Room.

M-14: Typical Ceiling Diffuser, Mens Locker Room.

KS Engineers, P.C.

42

ROOSEVELT ISLAND OPERATING CORPORATION


SPORTSPARK RECREATION FACILITY

M-15: Outdoor Condensing Unit for Office Air Handler, Lower Roof.

M-16: Outdoor Condensing Unit for Center Lobby Unit, Upper Roof.

KS Engineers, P.C.

43

ROOSEVELT ISLAND OPERATING CORPORATION


SPORTSPARK RECREATION FACILITY

M-17: Typical Air Handling Unit Air Filters- Dirty, Mechanical Room.

M-18: Outside Air Intake Damper Motor with Broken Linkage, East Mechanical Room.

KS Engineers, P.C.

44

ROOSEVELT ISLAND OPERATING CORPORATION


SPORTSPARK RECREATION FACILITY

M-19: Typical Exhaust Grille, Mens Locker Room.

M-20: Exhaust Duct- Rusted, Pool Filtration Room.

KS Engineers, P.C.

45

ROOSEVELT ISLAND OPERATING CORPORATION


SPORTSPARK RECREATION FACILITY
4.0

ELECTRICAL/FIRE ALARM

4.1 Description:
The Sportspark Recreational Facility at Roosevelt Island, NY was originally completed in
1977. The two (2) story 74,254 square foot structure with a partial basement contains a
basketball court, swimming pool, exercise room, recreational room, locker room, toilet rooms,
showers, administration offices, art studio, mechanical equipment rooms and electrical utility
room.
A 208Y/120V, 3-Phase, 4-wire electrical service enters the building from below ground into
the main switchboard and is comprised of an incoming/metering section and two 1200A
distribution sections containing (6) fused switches, (1) of which is a spare 200 amp switch.
There is no main switch. The Switchboard was manufactured by Alliance Electric and utilizes
Federal Pacific components. As is the case with most of the electrical equipment in the facility,
the switchboard is original equipment installed in 1976. The main switchboard appears to be in
good condition. (See Photo E-1)
From the switchboards six fused switches, power is distributed throughout the facility to
various branch circuit panelboards via (2) 800 amp, 3-phase, 4-wire distribution fused switch
panelboards. (See Photos E-2, E-3) There is also a 400A, 3-phase, 4-wire Emergency
Distribution fused switch panelboard fed from the main switchboard and emergency generator
in the 2nd floor mechanical room via a 400A automatic transfer switch. (See Photos E-4, E-5) It
is noted that the emergency generator was disconnected at the time of survey and not
operational.
As noted above, there is an 85KW, 208Y/120V, 3-phase, 4-wire Kohler diesel generator in the
2nd floor Mechanical room that appears to be original to the building. While the generator
appeared to be in fair condition, it has been disconnected. (See Photo E-6)
Lighting systems consist of ceiling mounted fluorescent, incandescent and HID lighting
systems. (See Photo E-7)
There is a new addressable fire alarm system which protects the facility.
4.2

Electrical Switchboards and Panelboards

Findings:
Main Distribution Equipment:
Generally, the main distribution equipment (main switchboard & main distribution
panelboards) are in satisfactory condition. This equipment is approximately 38+ years old.
Panelboards:
Branch circuit panelboards with molded case circuit breaker devices are located throughout the
facility. (See Photos E-8, E-9) As with the main distribution equipment, the panelboards are
original to the building and are approximately 38+ years old Generally, these panelboards the
facility are in satisfactory condition. However they are near the end of their life expectancy.

KS Engineers, P.C.

46

ROOSEVELT ISLAND OPERATING CORPORATION


SPORTSPARK RECREATION FACILITY
Panel SR, located in the Mechanical Equipment room adjacent to the Pool Equipment area
shows major corrosion of the panel exterior and on the wire trough above and is considered in
poor condition. (See Photo E-10) While an inspection of this panels interior components was
not performed as part of this survey, it can be reasonably assumed that the conditions which
have caused the corrosion of the panel exterior has caused significant degradation of this
panels interior components.
Panel UL, located in the upper lounge (Art Room) shows major corrosion of the panel
exterior and is considered in poor condition. (See Photo E-11) It can be reasonably assumed
that the conditions which have caused the corrosion of the panel exterior has caused significant
degradation of this panels interior components.
Recommendations:
It is recommended that an infrared survey be conducted of all major electrical equipment
including all main & distribution switchboards, and all branch circuit panelboards to identify
any urgent issues that require remediation. It is also recommended that an electrical
maintenance company be brought in to perform maintenance on this equipment in accordance
with NEMA guidelines. At that time main feeder cables should be inspected to evaluate the
condition of conductor insulation.
It is recommended that panels SR & UL mentioned above be considered for urgent
replacement. It is further recommended that a plan for replacement of the facilities branch
circuit panelboards be developed as the panelboards are rapidly approaching the end of their
life cycle.
Additionally it is recommended that the facility evaluate their current electrical preventative
maintenance programs and make adjustments as required to address any issues identified with
current practices.
4.3 Lighting Systems
Findings:
Lighting systems throughout the facility consist of mainly fluorescent and incandescent fixtures
in the general and utility areas and Metal Halide HID fixtures in the pool and gym areas. (See
Photos E-12, E-13) In general most of the existing lighting installation is in poor condition.
Most public areas are poorly lit giving a very dated look to this facility. Many fixtures
throughout the facility were not functioning at the time of the survey. (See Photo E-14)
The existing fluorescent lighting fixtures are older, inefficient T-12 lamp type. Many fixtures
have plastic diffusers that are yellowed with age. (See Photo E-15) In the pool corridor area,
many of the wall-mounted fixtures area are severely corroded and require replacement. (See
Photo E-16)
In the pool locker room areas the existing incandescent fixtures have been retro-fitted with selfballasted fluorescent lamps. (See Photo E-17) There are no globes on these fixtures leaving the
lamps exposed. In addition these fixtures are not suited for the damp conditions in the locker
room areas.

KS Engineers, P.C.

47

ROOSEVELT ISLAND OPERATING CORPORATION


SPORTSPARK RECREATION FACILITY
In the 2nd floor mechanical rooms, the existing lighting consists of chain mounted 2-lamp, T-12
Fluorescent lighting fixtures. The fixture wiring serving each lighting fixture from the junction
box is individual #12 THHN wires stranded through the chains. (See Photo E-18) This is not an
approved wiring method as wires chain is easily caught in the chain and the wire insulation
subsequently damaged.
Fluorescent lighting fixtures in the pool filter room were found to be severely corroded and
should be replaced. (See Photo E-19)
Battery emergency lighting & battery egress lighting units were observed in most public areas.
(See Photo E-20) As the original emergency & egress lighting systems were originally served
from the emergency generation system which is presently disconnected, proper emergency &
egress lighting should be verified throughout the facility.
Exterior lighting requires inspection/repair. Fixture was operating during daylight. (See Photo
E-21) Consideration should be given to installing a lighting control system in conformance
with the latest energy codes.
Recommendations:
It is recommended that the lighting systems in the public areas be upgraded with modern
energy-efficient fixtures to improve the performance of the lighting system and also save
operating costs. Lighting fixtures in all other areas, i.e., offices, utility areas, storage, can be
upgraded as budgets allow It is also recommended that the locker room fixtures be replaced
with new energy-efficient type, suitable for a damp/wet environment.
It is recommended that lighting fixtures in the 2nd floor mechanical rooms be replaced with new
energy-efficient type. As a minimum, the wiring from the lighting outlet junction box to the
fixture should be replaced with an approved wiring/cabling method. Additionally, lighting
fixtures installed in the mechanical rooms should be provided with wire guards to best protect
the lamps from breakage.
It is recommended that the corrosion-damaged lighting fixtures in the pool filter room be
replaced with energy-efficient lighting fixtures suitable for the pool filter room environment.
Verify proper emergency & egress lighting performance.
4.4 Wiring Systems
Findings:
Wiring systems, i.e., conduit installations, cables, receptacles, etc., observable throughout the
facility are generally in satisfactory condition. However a more detailed inspection of the
facilities receptacles including utilizing a plug-in wiring tester to verify receptacle wiring
should be performed given the age of the facility.
There were several deficiencies observed during the course of the investigations:
Open junction boxes were observed on the roof and 2nd floor mechanical rooms. - NEC
314.28(C) (See Photo E-22)
No service receptacle is provided for roof mounted HVAC equipment. NEC 210.63.

KS Engineers, P.C.

48

ROOSEVELT ISLAND OPERATING CORPORATION


SPORTSPARK RECREATION FACILITY
Conduit penetrations through the building exterior to roof mounted equipment are
improperly sealed. NEC 300.7 (See Photo E-23)
15 and 20 amp 120V, single-phase receptacles within 20 feet of the pool edge require
ground-fault protection. NEC 680.22
Receptacles within 6 feet of sinks require GFI protection. NEC 210.8(B)(6 & 7) (See
Photo E-24)
Receptacles in locker rooms/shower areas require GFI protection. NEC 210.8(B)(6 &
7). (See Photo E-25)
Provide GFI protection in all other wet areas as required. NEC 210.8(B)(6)
Provide GFI protection for all electric drinking fountains as required. NEC 422.52
Provide GFI protection for elevator machine room receptacle. NEC 620.85
Wiring systems within the pool filter room are severely corroded and in some case
conduits and conduit bodies have completely corroded away exposing the wiring
contained within. (See Photos E-26, E-27, E-28)
Exposed wiring at locations throughout the facility. (See Photos E-29, E-30, E-31)
Open / Missing junction boxes. (See Photo E-32)
Recommendations:
Perform all investigations and repairs necessary to further identify and rectify the deficiencies
noted above and bring the facility into conformance with current codes. Wiring systems within
the pool filter area should be replaced in their entirety utilizing corrosion resistant materials.
4.5 Fire Alarms
Findings:
A new addressable fire alarm system has been installed in the facility since the 2008 inspection.
It appears the system is mostly in compliance with current codes. (See Photos E-33, E-34, E35) Visual & visual/audio signaling device coverage appears to be adequate. It appears that the
lower rear elevator lobby does not have a smoke detector installed as required by NFPA 72.
(See Photo E-36) It appears that the old fire alarm remote graphic annunciators was left in entry
areas.
Recommendations:
Install smoke detector in the lower rear elevator lobby and modify elevator recall functions as
required. Remove all obsolete fire alarm graphic annunciators from entryways.

KS Engineers, P.C.

49

ROOSEVELT ISLAND OPERATING CORPORATION


SPORTSPARK RECREATION FACILITY
4.6 Electrical Photographs

E-1: Main Switchboard, Ground Floor Electrical Room.

E-2: Distribution Switchboard, Ground Floor Electrical Room.

KS Engineers, P.C.

50

ROOSEVELT ISLAND OPERATING CORPORATION


SPORTSPARK RECREATION FACILITY

E-3: Distribution Switchboard, Ground Floor Electrical Room.

E-4: Automatic Transfer Switch, Ground Floor Electrical Room.

KS Engineers, P.C.

51

ROOSEVELT ISLAND OPERATING CORPORATION


SPORTSPARK RECREATION FACILITY

E-5: Automatic Transfer Switch Interior, Ground Floor Electrical Room.

E-6: 85kw Diesel Generator, Second Floor Mechanical Room.

KS Engineers, P.C.

52

ROOSEVELT ISLAND OPERATING CORPORATION


SPORTSPARK RECREATION FACILITY

E-7: Typical Second Floor Lighting Installation.

E-8: Typical Branch Circuit Panelboard.

KS Engineers, P.C.

53

ROOSEVELT ISLAND OPERATING CORPORATION


SPORTSPARK RECREATION FACILITY

E-9: West Panelboard, Second Floor Mechanical Room.

E-10: Panelboard SR, Ground Floor Equipment Room.

KS Engineers, P.C.

54

ROOSEVELT ISLAND OPERATING CORPORATION


SPORTSPARK RECREATION FACILITY

E-11: Panelboard UL, Second Floor Upper Lobby.

E-12: HID Lighting, Gymnasium.

KS Engineers, P.C.

55

ROOSEVELT ISLAND OPERATING CORPORATION


SPORTSPARK RECREATION FACILITY

E-13: HID Lighting, Natatorium.

E-14: Typical Lobby Track Lighting and Recessed Down-lighting.

KS Engineers, P.C.

56

ROOSEVELT ISLAND OPERATING CORPORATION


SPORTSPARK RECREATION FACILITY

E-15: Typical Fluorescent Lighting Fixture, Egg Crate Diffuser.

E-16: Pool Corridor Lighting Fixtures.

KS Engineers, P.C.

57

ROOSEVELT ISLAND OPERATING CORPORATION


SPORTSPARK RECREATION FACILITY

E-17: Typical Lighting Fixtures in Shower Rooms.

E-18: Wiring to Typical Second Floor Mechanical Room Light Fixture.

KS Engineers, P.C.

58

ROOSEVELT ISLAND OPERATING CORPORATION


SPORTSPARK RECREATION FACILITY

E-19: Pool Filter Room Lighting Fixtures, Ground Floor.

E-20: Typical Corridor Egress Lighting Fixture with Emergency Lighting Heads.

KS Engineers, P.C.

59

ROOSEVELT ISLAND OPERATING CORPORATION


SPORTSPARK RECREATION FACILITY

E-21: Exterior Lighting Fixtures, East Faade.

E-22: Open Junction Box, Second Floor East Mechanical Room.

KS Engineers, P.C.

60

ROOSEVELT ISLAND OPERATING CORPORATION


SPORTSPARK RECREATION FACILITY

E-23: Conduit Penetration through Building Exterior.

E-24: Typical Receptaclebelow Sink.

KS Engineers, P.C.

61

ROOSEVELT ISLAND OPERATING CORPORATION


SPORTSPARK RECREATION FACILITY

E-25: Typical Receptacle, Locker Room.

E-26: Pool Filter Room Conduits.

KS Engineers, P.C.

62

ROOSEVELT ISLAND OPERATING CORPORATION


SPORTSPARK RECREATION FACILITY

E-27: Corrosion of Device Box, Pool Filter Room, Ground Floor.

E-28: Corrosion of Electrical Components, Pool Filter Room, Ground Floor.

KS Engineers, P.C.

63

ROOSEVELT ISLAND OPERATING CORPORATION


SPORTSPARK RECREATION FACILITY

E-29: Exposed Wiring, Pool Filter Room.

E-30: Open Junction Box / Exposed Wiring, Pool Filter Room.

KS Engineers, P.C.

64

ROOSEVELT ISLAND OPERATING CORPORATION


SPORTSPARK RECREATION FACILITY

E-31: Exposed Wiring, Pool Filter Room.

E-32: Open / Missing Junction Box at Roof Parapet.

KS Engineers, P.C.

65

ROOSEVELT ISLAND OPERATING CORPORATION


SPORTSPARK RECREATION FACILITY

E-33: Fire Alarm Control Panel, East Lobby.

E-34: Typical Fire Alarm Pull Station and Signaling Device.

KS Engineers, P.C.

66

ROOSEVELT ISLAND OPERATING CORPORATION


SPORTSPARK RECREATION FACILITY

E-35: Typical Duct Smoke Detector.

E-36: Missing Smoke Detector, Lower Rear Elevator Lobby.

KS Engineers, P.C.

67

ROOSEVELT ISLAND OPERATING CORPORATION


SPORTSPARK RECREATION FACILITY

5.0

PLUMBING

5.1 Description
The Sportspark Recreational Facility at Roosevelt Island, NY was originally opened in 1977.
The two (2) story 74,254 square foot structure with a partial basement contains a basketball
court, swimming pool, exercise room, recreational room, locker rooms, toilet rooms, showers,
administration offices, art studio and mechanical equipment rooms.
City water and steam presently enter the building from below ground in the basement
mechanical room adjacent to the pool filtration room. (See Photo P-1) The city water is piped
to a steam water heat exchanger where it is converted to domestic hot water. The city water
and domestic hot water are piped throughout the building to serve toilet rooms, showers, sinks,
water coolers and hose bibs. A separate hot water return line is connected at the end of the
most remote fixture requiring hot water and piped back to a domestic hot water circulating
pump located in the mechanical room.
Sanitary and vent piping serving plumbing fixtures is piped underground and in pipe chases.
The routing of the piping could not be observed.
Storm piping from roof drains is piped above existing ceilings. The routing of the piping could
not be observed.
A pool filtration system is located in a mechanical equipment room adjacent to the pool. This
system filters the water, adjusts the Ph and maintains pool water temperature.
5.2 Sanitary/Storm
Findings:
The sanitary and storm piping that was visually observed appeared to be in satisfactory
condition.
Recommendations:
It is recommended that all underground sanitary piping be visually inspected using a camera to
determine if the piping has any obstructions.
The roof drains in conjunction with the storm piping appeared to be in good condition.
However it was observed that there were no provisions made for emergency overflow in the
event that the primary roof drains become blocked or clogged with debris. (See Photo P-2)
It is recommended that secondary roof drains or scuppers be installed to comply with the 2008
NYC plumbing code.
5.3 Domestic Hot Water and Cold Water
Findings:
The city water line is piped to a steam to water heat exchanger and converted into domestic hot
water (approximately 120F). The domestic hot water temperature is maintained by a

KS Engineers, P.C.

68

ROOSEVELT ISLAND OPERATING CORPORATION


SPORTSPARK RECREATION FACILITY
modulating steam control valve at the heat exchanger. (See Photo P-3) The associated domestic
water piping in and out of the heat exchanger together with all shut off valves, strainers, unions
etc are original. (See Photo P-4) The pipe insulation is original and deteriorating in many areas.
(See Photo P-5)
Recommendations:
It is recommended that the existing piping, valves, strainers, unions, and insulation be replaced
from the heat exchanger to a point where the exposed piping leaves the mechanical room.
5.4 Pool Filtration System
Findings:
A separate steam to water heat exchanger is located in the pool filtration room adjacent to the
mechanical room. Hot water is circulated thru the heat exchanger via a dedicated pump which
also circulates the water thru a secondary coil type heat exchanger located in the pool water
compartment of the filtration system.
The discharge water temperature required to maintain pool water set point conditions is
regulated by two (2) modulation steam control valves located above the heat pool heat
exchanger. (See Photo P-6)
The pool filtration unit and associated pump and piping appear to have been recently replaced.
The associated hot water piping in and out of the primary heat exchanger together with all shut
off valves, strainers, unions, etc. are original. The pipe insulation is original and deteriorating
in many areas. (See Photo P-7)
Recommendations:
It is recommended that the existing piping, valves, strainers, unions, and insulation be replaced
from the primary heat exchanger to a point where the piping connects to the filtration system.
5.5 Pump
Findings:
The domestic hot water circulating pump located in the basement mechanical room appears to
be the original pump. The temperature gauge at the pump was not functioning. Therefore it
could not be determined if the controlling aquastat was working.
The pool filtration pump appeared to have been recently replaced and was operational at the
time of the inspection. (See Photo P-8)
The hot water circulating pump in conjunction with the primary and secondary heat exchangers
for the pool heating system appeared to be the original. (See Photos P-9, P-10, P-11)
Recommendations:
It is recommended that the existing domestic hot water circulating pump be replaced together
with a new controlling aquastat and temperature gauge.
5.6

Fixtures

KS Engineers, P.C.

69

ROOSEVELT ISLAND OPERATING CORPORATION


SPORTSPARK RECREATION FACILITY
Findings:
Lower Level West Floor Area: None of the plumbing fixtures located in the mens and
womens toilet rooms near the lobby of the lower west floor are ADA compliant.
The water closets are wall hung with push button flushometers. The distance from the floor to
the top of the regular height water closet seat is 15. The distance from the floor to the top of
the water closet seat used as an ADA water closet is 20. The width of the stall is 40 and the
depth is 60. (See Photo P-12)
The urinals are wall hung with push button flushometers. The distance from the floor to the lip
of the urinals is 22. (See Photo P-13)
The lavatory sinks are wall hung with metered faucets. (See Photo P-14) There is no insulating
pipe covering on the exposed piping below the sinks. The distance from the floor to the bottom
of the apron is 27.
None of the plumbing fixtures located in the mens and womens locker rooms are ADA
compliant.
The water closets are wall hung with push button flushometers. The distance from the floor to
the top of the regular height water closet seat is 15. The distance from the floor to the top of
the water closet seat used as an ADA water closet is 20. The width of the stall is 40 and the
depth is 62. (See Photo P-15)
The urinals are wall hung with push button flushometers. The distance from the floor to the lip
of the urinals is 23.
The lavatory sinks are wall hung with metered faucets. There is no insulating pipe covering on
the exposed piping below the sinks. The distance from the floor to the bottom of the apron is
27.
The showers are individual stall type with wall mount metering shower valves and tamper
resistant fixed shower heads. (See Photo P-16)
Recommendations:
It is recommended that one (1) stall in each of the mens and womens toilet rooms be
renovated to comply with the requirements of ADA. The new or relocated wall mounted water
closets shall be installed between 17 and 19 above the floor to the seat.
It is recommended that one (1) urinal in the mens toilet room be lowered so the lip of the
urinal will be a maximum of 17 above the floor.
It is recommended that the wall mounted lavatory sinks in the mens and womens rooms be
raised in order to comply with the minimum height requirements measured from the floor to the
bottom of the bowl for knee and leg access. Also the exposed piping under the lavatory sinks
must be covered with a protecting insulated covering.

KS Engineers, P.C.

70

ROOSEVELT ISLAND OPERATING CORPORATION


SPORTSPARK RECREATION FACILITY
It is recommended that the push button flush valves be tested to determine if they meet the 5
PSIG or less pressure to operate. If these do not meet the requirements they shall be adjusted to
comply or replaced.
Lower Level East Floor Area: None of the plumbing fixtures located in the mens and
womens pool area locker rooms are ADA compliant except for one 36x36 shower stall in
each of the mens and womens shower rooms. (See Photo P-17)
The water closets are wall hung with push button flushometers. (See Photo P-18) The distance
from the floor to the top of the regular height water closets is 16. The distance from the floor
to the top of the water closet seat that is being used as an ADA water closet is 20. The width
of this stall is 60 and the depth is 56.
The urinals are wall hung with push button flushometers. The distance from the floor to the lip
of the urinals is 22.
The lavatory sinks are wall mounted with metered faucets. (See Photo P-19) There is no
insulating pipe covering on the exposed piping below the sinks. The distance from the floor to
the bottom of the apron is 27.
The steam room consists of a shower head hose bib wall outlet and steam jet located near the
floor. This room is not ADA compliant.
The showers are individual stall type with wall mounted metering shower valves and tamper
resistant fixed shower heads. (See Photo P-20) Each of the mens and womens shower rooms
has one (1) ADA compliant shower stall complete with fold up seat and hand held shower. (See
Photo P-21, P-22)
The water closet, lavatory sink and stall shower located in the pool office toilet room is not
ADA compliant.(See Photo P-23)
The water closet is wall mounted with a lever handle flushometer. The distance from the floor
to the top of the seat is 17.
The lavatory sink is wall hung with a faucet that is not ADA compliant. There is no insulating
pipe covering of the exposed piping below the sink. The distance from the floor to the bottom
of the apron is 27
The shower stalls consist of a wall mounted manual shower valves and adjustable shower head.
(See Photo P-24)
Recommendations:
It is recommended that additional accommodations be considered in each of the mens and
womens toilet rooms when renovated to comply with the requirements of ADA.
The new or relocated wall mounted water closets shall be installed between 17 and 19 above
the floor to the seat.

KS Engineers, P.C.

71

ROOSEVELT ISLAND OPERATING CORPORATION


SPORTSPARK RECREATION FACILITY

It is recommended that one (1) urinal in the mens toilet room be lowered so the lip of the
urinal will be a maximum of 17 above the floor.
It is recommended that the wall mounted lavatory sinks in the mens and womens rooms be
raised in order to comply with the minimum height requirements measured from the floor to the
bottom of the bowl to permit knee and leg access. Also the exposed piping under the lavatory
sinks must be covered with a protecting insulated covering.
It is recommended that the push button flush valves be tested to determine if they meet the 5
PSIG or less pressure to operate. If these do not meet the requirements they shall be adjusted to
comply or replaced.
Upper Level East Floor Area: None of the plumbing fixtures located in the mens toilet room
located on the upper level Arts and Crafts room are ADA compliant.
The mens water closet is wall mounted with a push button flushometer. The distance from the
floor to the top of the seat is 20. (See Photo P-25)
The urinal is wall mounted with a push button flush valve. The distance from the floor to the
lip of the urinal is 22. (See Photo P-26)
The lavatory sink is wall mounted with metered faucets. There is no insulating pipe covering
on the exposed piping below the sink. The distance from the floor to the bottom of the apron is
27.
Recommendations:
Renovations to this toilet room are not recommended. ADA facilities on the main floor can be
used by occupants in this room.
Lower Level East Corridor: Mens ADA toilet room consists of one (1) water closet, one (1)
urinal and one (1) lavatory sink.
The water closet is wall mounted with a push button flushometer. The push button appears to
require more than 5 PSIG pressure to operate which is not ADA compliant. The distance from
the floor to the top of the seat is 20 which is not ADA compliant.
The urinal is wall mounted with a push button flush valve. The push button appears to require
more than 5 PSIG pressure to operate which is not ADA compliant. The distance from the floor
to the lip of the urinal is 23 which exceeds the ADA requirements. The lavatory sink is wall
mounted with 4 long wrist blade handles. The distance from the floor to the bottom of the
apron is 31. There is no insulating cover on the piping below the sink therefore it is not
ADA compliant. (See Photo P-27)
Womens ADA toilet room consists of one (1) water closet and one (1) lavatory. The water
closet is wall mounted with a push button flushometer. The push button appears to require

KS Engineers, P.C.

72

ROOSEVELT ISLAND OPERATING CORPORATION


SPORTSPARK RECREATION FACILITY
more than 5 PSIG pressure to operate which is not ADA compliant. The distance from the
floor to the top of the seat is 21 which is not ADA compliant. (See Photo P-28)
The lavatory sink is wall mounted with 4 long wrist blade handles. The distance from the
floor to the bottom of the apron is 31. There is no insulating cover on the piping below the
sink therefore it is not ADA compliant.
Wall mounted dual level water coolers are located in the lobby areas of the lower level east and
lower level west floors. The fixtures appear to be in fair condition and are ADA compliant.
(See Photo P-29)
Recommendations:
It is recommended that the water closets in the mens and womens ADA toilet room be
lowered to meet the ADA requirements of 17 to 19 above the floor to the seat.
It is recommended that the urinal in the mens ADA toilet room be lowered to meet the ADA
requirements of a maximum of 17 above the floor.
It is recommended that the exposed piping below the lavatory sinks be covered with a
protecting insulated covering.
It is recommended that the push button flush valves be tested to determine if they meet the 5
PSIG, or less pressure to operate. If these do not meet the requirements they shall be adjusted
to comply or replaced.
Note: For a plumbing fixture to be ADA compliant the following requirements are required.
Water Closet:
1) The compartment must be a minimum of 60 wide by 59 deep.
2) The distance from the floor to the top of the toilet seat must be between 17-19.
3) A flush valve must not require more than 5 PSIG to operate.
Urinal:
1) The distance from the floor to the lip of the urinal must not exceed 17.
2) A flush valve must not require more than 5 PSIG to operate.
Lavatory Sink:
1) There must be a minimum of 27 below the bowl for knee clearance when using a
wheelchair.
2) The exposed piping below the sink must be covered with insulated pipe covering.
3) Faucets shall be approved for ADA use.
4) Metered faucets shall remain on for a minimum of 10 seconds after activation.
Shower Stalls:

KS Engineers, P.C.

73

ROOSEVELT ISLAND OPERATING CORPORATION


SPORTSPARK RECREATION FACILITY

1) Shower stall enclosures shall be a minimum of 36 X 36 and have a grab bars and a
fold up seat.
2) Shower assembly shall be hand held with on/off buttons for operation and a braided
hose of at least 59 long.
5.7 Sprinklers
Findings:
Although the building was designed without a sprinkler system there are three (3) rooms that
have pendent sprinkler heads. These rooms are storage A (used as an office), Storage B (used
as a conference room) and Gym C (used as a weight room).
Storage A has two sprinkler heads, Storage B has two sprinkler heads and Gym C has one
sprinkler head. It could not be determined where the sprinkler piping was connected and if an
approved backflow preventer was installed at the point of connection.
Recommendations:
It is recommended that the sprinkler lines serving these rooms be investigated to:
1) Determine their origin.
2) Determine if an approved backflow preventer was installed.
It is further recommended that an approved backflow preventer be installed at each connection
point (if multiple taps are made) if none are present. The back pressure vent opening at each
assembly shall be piped to an approved indirect waste drain per the requirements of the 2008
NYC plumbing code.

KS Engineers, P.C.

74

ROOSEVELT ISLAND OPERATING CORPORATION


SPORTSPARK RECREATION FACILITY
5.8 Plumbing Photographs

P-1: Building services entrance Basement Mechanical Room

P-2: Roof Drains

KS Engineers, P.C.

75

ROOSEVELT ISLAND OPERATING CORPORATION


SPORTSPARK RECREATION FACILITY

P-3: Domestic water heater exchanger Basement Mechanical Room

P-4: Domestic water heat exchanger Basement Mechanical Room

KS Engineers, P.C.

76

ROOSEVELT ISLAND OPERATING CORPORATION


SPORTSPARK RECREATION FACILITY

P-5: Damaged insulation Basement Mechanical Room

P-6: Dual steam control valves for pool heat exchanger Basement Mechanical Room

KS Engineers, P.C.

77

ROOSEVELT ISLAND OPERATING CORPORATION


SPORTSPARK RECREATION FACILITY

P-7: Damaged insulation Basement Mechanical Room

P-8: Pool water filtration unit assembly

KS Engineers, P.C.

78

ROOSEVELT ISLAND OPERATING CORPORATION


SPORTSPARK RECREATION FACILITY

P-9: Pool heat exchanger Primary

P-10: Pool heat exchanger - Secondary

KS Engineers, P.C.

79

ROOSEVELT ISLAND OPERATING CORPORATION


SPORTSPARK RECREATION FACILITY

P-11: Pool water circulation pump

P-12: Regular height water closet Lower Level West

KS Engineers, P.C.

80

ROOSEVELT ISLAND OPERATING CORPORATION


SPORTSPARK RECREATION FACILITY

P-13: Urinals Lower Level West

P-14: Lavatory Lower Level West

KS Engineers, P.C.

81

ROOSEVELT ISLAND OPERATING CORPORATION


SPORTSPARK RECREATION FACILITY

P-15: ADA height water closet Lower Level East

P-16: Pool locker room metering showers Lower Level West

KS Engineers, P.C.

82

ROOSEVELT ISLAND OPERATING CORPORATION


SPORTSPARK RECREATION FACILITY

P-17: Pool locker room toilet stalls Lower Level West

P-18: Pool locker room water closet Lower Level West

KS Engineers, P.C.

83

ROOSEVELT ISLAND OPERATING CORPORATION


SPORTSPARK RECREATION FACILITY

P-19: Pool locker room lavatory sinks Lower Level West

P-20: Locker Room shower Lower Level East

KS Engineers, P.C.

84

ROOSEVELT ISLAND OPERATING CORPORATION


SPORTSPARK RECREATION FACILITY

P-21: Pool locker room ADA shower Lower Level West

P-22: Pool locker room ADA shower Lower Level West

KS Engineers, P.C.

85

ROOSEVELT ISLAND OPERATING CORPORATION


SPORTSPARK RECREATION FACILITY

P-23: Pool office toilet room Lower Level West

P-24: Pool locker room shower stalls Lower Level West

KS Engineers, P.C.

86

ROOSEVELT ISLAND OPERATING CORPORATION


SPORTSPARK RECREATION FACILITY

P-25: Upper level mens toilet room Arts/Crafts

P-26: Upper level mens toilet room Arts/Crafts

KS Engineers, P.C.

87

ROOSEVELT ISLAND OPERATING CORPORATION


SPORTSPARK RECREATION FACILITY

P-27: Mens ADA toilet room Lower Level West

P-28: Womens ADA toilet room Lower Level West

KS Engineers, P.C.

88

ROOSEVELT ISLAND OPERATING CORPORATION


SPORTSPARK RECREATION FACILITY

P-29: Dual level water cooler

KS Engineers, P.C.

89

ROOSEVELT ISLAND OPERATING CORPORATION


SPORTSPARK RECREATION FACILITY
6.0

ROOFING

6.1

Description: Sportspark Upper Roof Area


Building type:
Construction year:
Framing structure:
Foundation:
Exterior:
Roof structure:
Roof slope:
Building height:

Institutional
1977
Concrete-precast
Slab-on-grade
Brick
Concrete-precast
Flat
2 floors

Roof Assembly - Sportspark Upper Roof Area


The table(s) and photograph(s) below represent the general EPDM roof system assembly
observed during the roof condition assessment of Sports Park Upper Roof Area:
Layer
Surfacing
Membrane
Insulation
Membrane
Insulation
Deck

Description
Washed river rock
EPDM
Expanded polystyrene (EP
Multi Ply BUR
Unknown
Structural concrete / Tectum
(precast/prestressed)

Attachment
Loose laid
Loose laid
Loose laid
Hot asphalt
Unknown
Unknown

Thickness
Varies 45 mil
Unknown
Unknown
2 inches
Unknown

Roof System History - Sportspark Upper Roof Area


Roof type:

EPDM

Roof area:

Installation year:

1985

Manufacturer:

Firestone Roofing
Products, Inc
No Contractor
Information
No Contractor
Information

Est. replacement
year:
Manufacturer
warranty:
Contractor warranty:

Installation
contractor:
Repair contractor:

Roof access:

33,700 square
feet
2014
No
No
Exterior ladder

Findings: Sportspark Upper Roof Area


The two story recreational facility, reportedly constructed in 1977, has three distinct roof
sections. The upper most roof section consists of a ballasted EPDM roof which was installed
over the original gravel surface roof over 2 rigid insulation over a concrete roof deck. These
types of roofs installed in accordance with the manufacturers specifications and with a
preventive maintenance program have an expected service life of 20 years. There are two
lower roof areas and each consists of a gravel surface built up roof over a concrete deck which

KS Engineers, P.C.

90

ROOSEVELT ISLAND OPERATING CORPORATION


SPORTSPARK RECREATION FACILITY
appears to be original to the building construction. No roofing contractor information, building
specifications, AS built drawings, roof maintenance and leak log were available for review. A
previous assessment report dated March 25th, 2008 was available and reviewed prior to the
inspection. No roof leaks were reported or active roof leaks observed during our inspection.
The ballasted EPDM roof system installed on the upper most roof area is approximately 28
years old as confirmed by the observation of the manufacturers stamp which is dated 1985.
The ballasted roof system is in poor condition and has passed its expected service life. Due to
the installation of ballast the majority of the roof surface is not visible for inspection. In areas
that are exposed many significant deficiencies were observed, including but not limited to
punctures, open laps and bridging of wall flashings. It appears that most of the roof leaks are
being contained by the original gravel surfaced built up roof left in place.
The perimeter of the building consists of a masonry parapet wall which is capped with a prefinished metal coping system. The pre-finished metal coping system appears to be in poor
condition. The paint finish has worn away and in many areas exposing bare metal. The joints
have been sealed in the past with a sealant, however in many areas the sealant has either
deteriorated and is cracking and or is no longer present. It is recommended that the copings be
replaced when the roof system is replaced. The mortar joints of the masonry wall in many
areas appear to be in poor condition and will require repointing. Areas of specific concern are
the mortar joints at the thru wall counter flashing. Much of the masonry in these areas has
begun to disintegrate and is easily removed by hand, where it is not already missing
completely. The copper counter flashings however appear to be in fair condition. The joints in
the counter flashing have begun to separate and are open and most likely occurred during the
operations of the ballasted roof system. Upon replacement of the roof system the copper
counter flashing should be adequately riveted at all joints as needed to provide additional
flashing protection. The EPDM membrane has begun to pull away from the masonry wall. It
was observed that no termination bar was utilized for the securement of the membrane.
Instead, masonry nails with round plates were used. In many spots the EPDM was observed as
tearing where the fastener was placed. Should the replacement of the roof system be deferred
for an extended period of time, it is recommended to attempt to properly secure the EPDM to
prevent further separation of the EPDM membrane from the masonry wall so as to prevent
potential leaks that may occur along the perimeter walls.
There are a minimal amount of roof top penetrations on this roof area that consist of vent pipes,
mechanical curbs, HVAC units, and skylights. Roof top penetrations and roof top curb EPDM
base flashings appear to be in poor condition. Many open EPDM corner flashing wraps as well
as torn EPDM membrane at flashings, pitch-pockets and curbs were observed. They should be
repaired to prevent moisture from entering the roof system and the building. The skylights
located on this roof section are original to the construction of the facility and many were
observed to be damaged, have poor or broken seals, and in some cases have open EPDM
flashings along the base and curbs. Interior staining indicates water infiltration at mutliple
skylight and curb locations. It is recommended that the skylights be replaced when the roof
system is replaced.
The roof area appears to have mono-directional slope towards internal roof drains located along
the north perimeter wall. No ponding water was observed on the roof or near the drains areas

KS Engineers, P.C.

91

ROOSEVELT ISLAND OPERATING CORPORATION


SPORTSPARK RECREATION FACILITY
and it is believed that the roof drainage systems is functioning as intended and is providing
adequate drainage for the roof area. Many roof drain clamping rings and hardware appear to be
corroding and it is recommended that the bolts and washers be replaced with new stainless steel
hardware.
Recommendations: Sportspark Upper Roof Area
The 28 year old .045 mil Ballasted EPDM roof system has surpassed its serviceable life and is
in poor condition. Many significant deficiencies were observed and it is highly recommended
to make repairs to punctures and tears in the membrane to prevent additional moisture from
entering the roof system and the building until the roof system is replaced. Replacement would
require the complete removal of all roofing materials down to the concrete deck. With the
replacement of the roof system, it is also recommended to replace the existing coping system
with a new pre-finished metal coping system. The skylights currently in place also require
replacement and should be completed at the same time the roof is being replaced to ensure a
complete and weather tight system and flashings are achieved. Masonry repairs that are
required should also be completed prior to the installation of the new system to prevent
possible damages during repair operations over a newly installed membrane. Only urgent
repairs are recommended and this roof should be replaced in 2014.
Urgent Repairs
1. Repair punctures and openings in roof membrane, flashings and penetrations (see photos R12, R-13, R-14, R-15, R-16).
Budget: $3,500.00
2. Repair damaged pitch pockets (see photo R-18).
Budget: $1,750.00
Total Estimated Repair Budget: $5,250.00
Preventative Repairs
1. Repair membrane that is bridging and pulling away from parapet wall due to lack of
adequate termination (see photo R-17).
Budget: $2,500.00
2. Seal open joints in copings where required (see photo R-21).
Budget: $ 750.00
3. Prime and paint metal copings (see photo R-22).
Budget: $1,500.00
4. Seal masonry joints at thru wall counter flashings (see photos R-23, R-24).
Budget: $1,500.00
5. Prune tree growth away from roof area (see photo R-25).
Budget: $ 500.00
6. Replace drain hardware with new stainless steel bolts and washers. (see photo R-26)
Budget: $1,000.00
Total Estimated Repair Budget: $7,750.00

KS Engineers, P.C.

92

ROOSEVELT ISLAND OPERATING CORPORATION


SPORTSPARK RECREATION FACILITY

Roof Replacement
1.
2.
3.

Remove existing roof assemblies down to the deck


Install new code compliant roof insulation, flashings and accessories
Install new fully adhered single ply membrane system

Estimated Replacement Budget Year: 2014


Total Estimated Budget: $1,920,000.00
Skylight Replacement
1.
2.

Remove existing skylights and curbs and protective screens


Install new code compliant energy efficient skylights and mounting curbs

Estimated Replacement Budget Year: 2014


Total Estimated Budget: $220,000.00

6.2 Upper Roof Area Photographs

R-1: Northwest Corner of upper roof area

R-2: North, Center Section of upper roof area

KS Engineers, P.C.

93

ROOSEVELT ISLAND OPERATING CORPORATION


SPORTSPARK RECREATION FACILITY

R-3: South, Center Section of upper roof area

R-4: Skylights at upper roof area, looking


southeast

R-5: Skylights at upper roof area, looking


southwest

R-6: Typical rooftop HVAC equipment support


framing at upper roof area

R-7: Typical rooftop vent installation detail at


upper roof area

R-8: Typical drain at upper roof area

KS Engineers, P.C.

94

ROOSEVELT ISLAND OPERATING CORPORATION


SPORTSPARK RECREATION FACILITY

R-9: Typical metal coping condition at upper


roof area, looking west

R-10: Manufacturers stamp date visible at


upper roof area

R-11: Interior view of concrete roof deck


typical throughout

R-12: Example of punctures, openings in roof


membrane

R-13: Open joints in roof membrane at rooftop


vent flashing

R-14: Open joints in roof membrane at rooftop


vent curb

KS Engineers, P.C.

95

ROOSEVELT ISLAND OPERATING CORPORATION


SPORTSPARK RECREATION FACILITY

R-15: Loose rooftop plumbing penetration vent


flashing

R-16: Typical punctures and openings in roof


flashings

R-17: Membrane bridging and pulling away


from parapet wall

R-18: Deteriorated pitch pockets at utility


penetrations

R-19: Damaged skylight section at upper roof


area

R-20: Typical condition of skylight frame and


acrylic glazing

KS Engineers, P.C.

96

ROOSEVELT ISLAND OPERATING CORPORATION


SPORTSPARK RECREATION FACILITY

R-21: Open joints in parapet copings

R-22: Metal copings at north parapet, looking


west

R-23: Open joints at counter flashings, parapet


interior

R-24: Open masonry joints at thru wall counter


flashings

R-25: Tree growth adjacent to upper roof


parapet, north side

R-26: Missing drain hardware, typical


throughout

KS Engineers, P.C.

97

ROOSEVELT ISLAND OPERATING CORPORATION


SPORTSPARK RECREATION FACILITY
6.3

Description: Sportspark Lower Roof Areas

Roof Assembly - Sportspark Lower Roof Areas


The table(s) and photograph(s) below represent the general BUR roof system assembly
observed during the roof condition assessment of Sports Park Lower Roof Areas:
Layer
Surfacing
Membrane
Insulation
Deck

Description
Gravel
Ply sheet
Unknown
Structural concrete
(precast/prestressed)

Attachment
Hot asphalt
Hot asphalt
Unknown
Unknown

Thickness
Varies Unknown 2 inches
Unknown -

Roof System History - Sportspark Lower Roof Areas


Roof type:

BUR

Roof area:

Installation year:

1977

Manufacturer:

No Manufacturer
Information
No Contractor
Information
No Contractor
Information

Est. replacement
year:
Manufacturer
warranty:
Contractor warranty:

Installation
contractor:
Repair contractor:

Roof access:

7,600 square
feet
2014
No
No
Stairwell

Findings: Sportspark Lower Roof Areas


The roof system design on the two lower roof areas consists of a gravel surface built up roof
system. These types of roof systems were installed in accordance with the manufacturers
specification and with a preventative maintenance plan and have an expected service life of 2025 years. These roof areas appear to be original to the building. No roof warranty, contractor
information, as built drawings, maintenance logs, or specifications were available for review.
No roof leaks were reported by the building management.
The 36 year old gravel surface built up roof systems present on the lower roof areas appear to
be installed in accordance with industry standards and appear to be in poor to fair condition and
have passed their expected service life. In several locations ridging and blistering of felts were
observed. This is an indication that the roof system has reached the end of its serviceable life.
Areas where blistering is present, are susceptible to failure and moisture infiltration if left
uncorrected.
The perimeter of the building consists of a masonry parapet wall which is capped with a prefinished metal coping system. The pre-finished metal coping system appears to be in poor
condition. The paint finish has worn away and in many areas exposing bare metal. The joints
have been sealed in the past with a sealant, however in many areas the sealant has either
deteriorated and is cracking and or is no longer present. It is recommended that the copings be

KS Engineers, P.C.

98

ROOSEVELT ISLAND OPERATING CORPORATION


SPORTSPARK RECREATION FACILITY
replaced when the roof system is replaced. A penetration was observed passing through the
wall at the West roof area and was never properly sealed, thus no protection from the elements
is afforded at this location. It is imperative that this opening be properly sealed to prevent
further moisture from entering the masonry wall and building and causing damage. The mortar
joints of the masonry wall in many areas appear to be in poor condition and will require
repointing. Areas of specific concern are the mortar joints at the thru wall counter flashing.
Much of the masonry in these areas has begun to disintegrate and is easily removed by hand,
where it is not already missing completely. The copper counter flashings however appear to be
in fair condition. The joints in the counter flashing have begun to separate and should be
riveted at the laps to prevent further separation. The wall flashing material has been coated with
an aluminized coating and appears to be in fair condition. Some cracking of the flashings was
observed at the vertical laps and will require repair to maintain protection against moisture
infiltration.
There are a minimal amount of roof top penetrations on this roof area that consist of vent pipes,
mechanical curbs, and HVAC units. Most roof top penetrations and roof top curb base
flashings appear to be in fair condition. Corner flashings as well as some base flashing were
observed to be partially open and require repair to prevent moisture from entering the roof
system and the building. Many pitch pockets observed appear to be in poor condition and will
require replacement. At two powered roof vent curbs, conduit was passed through the curb
wall and was left unsealed. This penetration should be properly sealed with a quality urethane
sealant.
Recommendations: Sportspark Lower Roof Areas
The 36 year old built up roofs appear to have been installed in accordance with the
manufacturers specifications, within industry standards, and are in poor to fair condition for
their age. Many significant deficiencies were observed and it is highly recommended to make
priority repairs to prevent additional moisture from entering the roof system and the building
until the roof system is replaced. Replacement would require the complete removal of all
roofing materials down to the concrete deck. With the replacement of the roof system it is also
recommended to replace the existing coping system with a new pre-finished metal coping
system. Masonry repairs that are required should also be completed prior to the installation of
the new system to prevent possible damages during repair operations over a newly installed
membrane. Only priority repairs are recommended at this time. The roof should be replaced in
the near future.
Priority Repairs
1. Repair flashings at vent curbs where cracked and or open (see photos R-40, R-41).
Budget: $ 1,500.00
2. Properly seal penetration at curb sidewall (see photos R-42, R-43).
Budget: $
300.00
3. Replace damaged pitch pockets (see photos R-45, R-46).
Budget: $
750.00
4. Repair penetration at masonry wall as required (see photo R-51).
Budget: $ 7,475.00
Total Estimated Repair Budget:

KS Engineers, P.C.

$ 10,125.00
99

ROOSEVELT ISLAND OPERATING CORPORATION


SPORTSPARK RECREATION FACILITY
Preventative Repairs
1. Repair masonry joints at thru-wall counter flashing (see photos R-36 thru R-40).
Budget: $ 14,950.00
2. Replace corroding drain hardware at all roof drains (see photo R-44).
Budget: $
800.00
3. Rivet and seal open joints at counter flashing (see photo R-47).
Budget: $
500.00
4. Replace undersized/improper drain strainers where required (see photos R-48, R-49).
Budget: $ 450.00
5. Install proper supports at AC unit to lift off roof system surface (see photo R-50).
Budget: $ 350.00
Total Estimated Repair Budget: $ $17,050.00
Roof Replacement
1. Remove existing roof assemblies down to the deck
2. Install new code compliant roof insulation, flashings and accessories
3. Install new fully adhered single ply membrane system
Estimated Replacement Budget Year: 2014
Total Estimated Budget: $480,000.00
6.4

Lower Roof Area Photographs

R-27: View of Lower west roof section,


looking west

R-28: View of Lower west roof section, looking


north

KS Engineers, P.C.

100

ROOSEVELT ISLAND OPERATING CORPORATION


SPORTSPARK RECREATION FACILITY

R-29: View of Lower west roof section,


looking south

R-30: View of Lower east roof section, looking


south

R-31: View of Lower East roof section, looking


north

R-32: Typical wall flashings and counter


flashing, east and west roof sections

R-33: Typical condition of metal coping


system, east and west roof sections

R-34: Typical roof top equipment located on


both east and west roof sections

KS Engineers, P.C.

101

ROOSEVELT ISLAND OPERATING CORPORATION


SPORTSPARK RECREATION FACILITY

R-35: Typical roof drain condition located on


both lower roof sections

R-36: Deteriorated masonry joints at parapet


above counter flashing

R-37: Typical condition of flashing and counter


flashing

R-38: Open masonry joints at thru-wall counter


flashing

R-39: Deteriorated masonry joints at thru-wall


counter flashing, south side

R-40: Deteriorated flashings at vent curbs

KS Engineers, P.C.

102

ROOSEVELT ISLAND OPERATING CORPORATION


SPORTSPARK RECREATION FACILITY

R-41: Open flashings at rooftop vent curbs

R-42: Deteriorated utility penetration seals at


curb sidewall

R-43: Open penetrations at curb sidewall

R-44: Corroded drain hardware at all roof drains

R-45: Deteriorated pitch pockets, typical

R-46: Damaged pitch pockets at rooftop vents

KS Engineers, P.C.

103

ROOSEVELT ISLAND OPERATING CORPORATION


SPORTSPARK RECREATION FACILITY

R-47: Open joints at parapet counter flashing

R-48: Deteriorated drain strainers, typical

R-49: Undersized or improper drain strainers,


typical

R-50: Missing supports/dunnage at rooftop AC


unit.

R-51: Open utility penetration at masonry


parapet wall

KS Engineers, P.C.

104

ROOSEVELT ISLAND OPERATING CORPORATION


SPORTSPARK RECREATION FACILITY
7.0

COST ANALYSIS

The estimated cost of renovation and replacement is shown in Appendices A and B,


respectively. The cost of complete renovation is estimated at $16.4 million while the cost of
replacement is estimated at $36 million.
KSE has considered all costs associated with the projects weve identified. Such costs may be
nonrecurring such as labor, capital investment, and certain operations and services or recurring
such as changes in personnel, supplies, and materials or maintenance and repair.
The cost of renovation is broken up to two major categories: short term or priority repairs and
long term renovation. Short term repairs include necessary repairs to remove water infiltration
as the main source of visible damage to both the interior finishes and exterior faade
deterioration.
Priority repairs include the following:
Replacement of Upper and Lower Roofs: Roof Replacement will provide greater
insulating, prevent further occurrences of water infiltration and thus, stem associated
deterioration to the exterior faade and interior finishes (estimated cost at $2,400,000).
Replacement of the skylights and associated curbs: Skylights Replacement will provide
insulating and increased natural lighting benefits (estimated cost at $220,000)
Re-pointing of the interior parapet masonry and the metal parapet coping: Parapet and
Coping Restoration will stabilize faade attachment deterioration and eliminate water
infiltration issues by allowing for the proper installation of new flashings (estimated
cost at $190,000).
The cost of the priority repairs is estimated at $2,810,000.
Long term repairs or renovation are divided into multiple projects that could be undertaken
independently minimizing interruptions to the use of the building. They are:
Faade Restoration: CMU Infill Replacement at the Gym and Natatorium will provide
an energy-efficient solution while providing more natural lighting thus reducing current
electric loads. One associated benefit will be the reduced structural load on the pre-cast
concrete spandrels temporarily supported by steel tubes along the south elevation. The
replacement material/system will provide the added benefit of complying with green,
LEED requirements. (estimated cost at $1,900,000).
Parapet Restoration/Reconstruction: Complete parapet rebuilding will alleviate any
concerns regarding its integrity and allow for complete replacement of through-wall
flashing and faade attachment. (estimated cost at $1,100,000).
Ceiling Replacement (estimated cost at $175,000).
Window Replacement: Windows and Glazing Replacement will result in energy savings
and reduce operating costs (estimated cost at $475,000).
Door Replacement (estimated cost at $370,000).
Replacement of Interior Athletic Surfaces (estimated cost at $935,000).
Locker and Bathroom Replacement: Restroom/Locker Room Renovations will ensure
compliance with current codes and allow for the installation of more efficient fixtures

KS Engineers, P.C.

105

ROOSEVELT ISLAND OPERATING CORPORATION


SPORTSPARK RECREATION FACILITY
resulting in lower operating costs. Associated aesthetic benefits will result in increased
membership and usage (estimated cost at $2,000,000).
Site Construction: Replacement of outdoor athletic and recreational surfaces, equipment
and amenities restoring those facilities for use (estimated cost at $325,000).
Concrete Restoration and Reconstruction: This work will restore existing walkways and
surfaces to a new state and allow for compliance with ADA codes (estimated cost at
$360,000).
Handrails and Railing Replacement: The replacement of damaged handrails and also
upgrade to comply with ADA codes (estimated cost at $50,000).
Interior Finishes and Casework: Miscellaneous repairs and replacement of cabinetry to
enhance the interior (estimated cost at $140,000).
Athletic Equipment Replacement: An allowance to provide for the replacement and/or
repairs to athletic equipment (estimated cost at $150,000).
Furnishings Replacement: An allowance to provide for the replacement of interior
office and lobby furniture (estimated cost at $60,000).
Pool Rehabilitation: Complete upgrade to the pool and surrounding area including
filtration and pumping equipment (estimated cost at $800,000).
Elevator Upgrade: A project intended to rehabilitate the existing elevator and comply
with ADA code requirements (estimated cost at $150,000).
HVAC Upgrades: Rehabilitation and replacement of existing equipment and system
upgrades will result in more efficient operating use (estimated cost at $2,000,000).
Electric Power and Distribution Upgrades: Rehabilitation and replacement of existing
electrical power and distribution equipment resulting in more efficient and safe
operation (estimated cost at $1,800,000).
Fire Alarm System Replacement: Replacement of fire alarm/security systems to comply
with current codes (estimated cost at $840,000).
The cost of the long term repairs is estimated at $13,630,000.
Total cost for renovation (priority and long term) is estimated at $16,440,000
8.0 FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS
The feasibility of renovating the structure as compared to replacing it is discussed in this
section. As indicated in the previous section, the cost of complete renovation is estimated at
$16.4 million while the cost of replacement is estimated at $36 million. It is our
recommendation to renovate the structure rather than replacing it for the following reasons:
Our inspection did not reveal any notable structural defects to the primary systems
(precast concrete framing or foundation).
The building is only 36 years old and has not reached its life expectancy. Renovating
the structure will extend its useful life for at least another 30 years.
The building is not functionally obsolete requiring replacement.
The cost of demolition and rebuilding is more than double the cost of complete
renovation.

KS Engineers, P.C.

106

ROOSEVELT ISLAND OPERATING CORPORATION


SPORTSPARK RECREATION FACILITY
Building a completely new facility will result in approximately two years of lost use and
revenue. Due to the lack of additional land, the existing facility will have to be
demolished to allow for construction in the same footprint.
Complete renovation could be phased allowing continual use of the building with
minimum interruptions. There will be disruptions to specific uses and facilities within
the building but complete closure will not be required. For example, the natatorium and
associated locker rooms could be temporary closed to allow for renovation in those
areas only. The same could be considered for other sections and the phasing arranged
accordingly. The building layout compartmentalizes by function or use making phasing
considerations obvious. Other long-term projects such as ADA compliance, new HVAC
and electrical systems can be scheduled for optimal times reducing the operational
impacts to the building.

CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS


KSEs primary task was to determine the structural condition and mechanical building
components of the Sportspark structure. The inspection also included cursory reviews of
architectural, roofing, electrical and plumbing systems.
The inspection revealed that the primary structural systems are in good condition. Minor
defects noted were the cause of water infiltration from the defective roofing material and cracks
in the masonry faade.
We have also identified Priority repairs which include those components or systems determined
to be the root cause of most existing deterioration. These repairs should be considered for
implementation in the near future to stabilize the building and prevent further degradation.
Long term repairs or renovation should be considered in future planning for the facility. One of
the most important items is the removal of the CMU infills at the Gymnasium and Natatorium
areas and replacement with a translucent panel system that will satisfy several issues and result
in a lower-cost, permanent solution. This concern involves the condition of the masonry faade
along the south elevation. The irregularity of the surface brick is an indication of attachment
failure caused by the aforementioned water infiltration and resulting corrosion. The
replacement material/system will provide natural lighting and provide the added benefit of
complying with green, LEED requirements. Due to the reduced loads on the pre-cast concrete
spandrel, the tubular steel support columns can be removed.
In conclusion, KSE recommends consideration of the Priority repairs which are elements taken
from the overall renovations estimate. Once these repairs have been completed, additional
projects developed from the overall renovations estimate can be considered as capital
improvement budgets allow. Phasing development is then recommended to provide budgetary
information for use by the R.I.O.C. in the development of their long-term planning.

KS Engineers, P.C.

107

ROOSEVELT ISLAND OPERATING CORPORATION


PROJECT: Sportspark Recreational Facility
Projects Cost Estimate
DESCRIPTION OF WORK

ROOF REPLACEMENT
Temporary Facilities
Safety and Temporary Protection
Selective Demolition - Upper Roof
Selective Demolition - Lower Roofs
Manufactured Roof Specialties - Flashings - Upper Roof
Manufactured Roof Specialties - Flashings - Lower Roofs
Elastomeric Membrane Roofing and Insulation - Upper Roof
Elastomeric Membrane Roofing and Insulation - Lower Roofs
SKLYLIGHT REPLACEMENT
Selective Demoltion - Skylights and Curbs
Skylight Curb Replacement
Shed Skyroof Installation - Translucent Panel System- Upper Roof
PARAPET REPOINTING / METAL COPING REPLACEMENT
Temporary Facilities
Safety and Temporary Protection
Masonry Restoration - Mortar Replacement/Repointing - Parapet Interior
Manufactured Roof Specialties - Parapet Coping - Upper Roof
Manufactured Roof Specialties - Parapet Coping - Lower Roofs
FAADE RESTORATION
Temporary Facilities
Safety and Temporary Facilities
Selective Demolition - Faade
Masonry Restoration - Mortar Replacement/Repointing - North Elevation
Masonry Restoration - Mortar Replacement/Repointing - South Elevation
Masonry Restoration - Mortar Replacement/Repointing - East Elevation
Masonry Restoration - Mortar Replacement/Repointing - West Elevation
Surface-Bonded Brick Masonry - Faade Veneer Replacement- North Elevation
Surface-Bonded Brick Masonry - Faade Veneer Replacement- South Elevation
Surface-Bonded Brick Masonry - Parapet Faade Veneer Replacement- Exterior
Masonry Control and Expansion Joints
Masonry Restoration- CMU Repointing, Injection
Scaffolding
GYMNASIUM / NATATORIUM - TRANSLUCENT PANEL SYSTEM
Temporary Facilities
Safety and Temporary Facilities
Sloped Glazing Demolition - Gymnasium and Pool - South Elevation
CMU Wall Demolition - North Elevation
Translucent Wall Panel System - North Elevation
PARAPET RESTORATION / RECONSTRUCTION
Temporary Facilities
Safety and Temporary Facilities
Selective Demolition - Parapets
Selective Demolition - Faade
Cavity Wall Unit Masonry - Parapets
Surface-Bonded Brick Masonry - Parapet Faade Veneer Replacement- Interior
Scaffolding
REPLACEMENT OF CEILINGS
East Lower Level Lobby
East Lower Level Corridor
East Lower Level Lounge
East Lower Level Key Room
East Lower Level Instructors Room

UNIT
QNTY
UNIT
MEAS

1
1
33,700
7,600
1,080
550
33,700
7,600

2,160
1,176
2,160

1
1
2,790
1,080
335

LS
LS
SF
SF
LF
LF
SF
SF

SF
LF
SF

LS
LS
SF
LF
LF

MATL., LABOR, EQUIP.


UNIT
TOTAL
COST

2013-1432
1/14/2014
TOTAL COST
Including
O+P

5,000.00
10,000.00
4.40
4.40
58.70
38.70
32.00
32.00
Total

5,000.00
10,000.00
148,280.00
33,440.00
63,396.00
21,285.00
1,078,400.00
243,200.00
1,603,001.00

2,400,000.00

4.75
8.50
58.00
Total

10,260.00
9,996.00
125,280.00
145,536.00

220,000.00

10,000.00
10,000.00
14.00
45.00
58.70
Total

10,000.00
10,000.00
39,060.00
48,600.00
19,664.50
127,324.50

190,000.00

1
1
15,950
960
2,640
2,400
2,400
2,580
7,900
5,040
384
500
1

LS
LS
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
LF
LF
LS

15,000.00
20,000.00
13.00
14.00
14.00
14.00
14.00
42.00
42.00
42.00
16.00
32.00
45,000.00

15,000.00
20,000.00
207,350.00
13,440.00
36,960.00
33,600.00
33,600.00
108,360.00
331,800.00
211,680.00
6,144.00
16,000.00
45,000.00

1
1
1,260
1,680
1,680

LS
LS
SF
SF
SF

5,000.00
15,000.00
36.00
14.50
72.00
Total

5,000.00
15,000.00
45,360.00
24,360.00
120,960.00
1,289,614.00

1,900,000.00

5,000.00
10,000.00
13.00
13.00
32.00
42.00
30,000.00
Total

5,000.00
10,000.00
72,800.00
207,350.00
179,200.00
211,680.00
30,000.00
716,030.00

1,100,000.00

11.50
11.50
11.50
11.50
11.50

8,625.00
8,625.00
14,375.00
4,830.00
3,795.00

1
1
5,600
15,950
5,600
5,040
1

750
750
1,250
420
330

LS
LS
SF
SF
SF
SF
LS

SF
SF
SF
SF
SF

A-1

ROOSEVELT ISLAND OPERATING CORPORATION


PROJECT: Sportspark Recreational Facility
Projects Cost Estimate
DESCRIPTION OF WORK

West Lower Level Lobby


West Lower Level Corridor
West Lower Level Conference Room
West Lower Level Offices
East Upper Level Lounge
REPLACEMENT OF EXISTING WINDOWS
Temporary Facilities
Safety and Temporary Facilities
Type A- North Elevation (7'-9" x 11'-7") - 1 each
Type B- North Elevation (28'-6" x 4'-8") - 8 each
Type C- North Elevation (25'-0" x 4'-8") - 2 each
Type D- North Elevation (9'-0" x 4'-8") - 1 each
Type E- North Elevation (7'-2" x 11'-7") - 1 each
Type F- South Elevation (3'-0" x 2'-4") - 2 each
Type G- South Elevation (30'-0" x 4'-6") Gymnasium - Translucent Panel System
Type H- South Elevation (3'-0" x 6'-6") - 2 each
Type I- South Elevation (90'-0" x 9'-0") Natatorium - Translucent Panel System
Type J- West Elevation (19'-6" x 2'-9") - 2 each
Type K- West Elevation (14'-10" x 2'-9") - 1 each
Type L- East Elevation (14'-10" x 2'-9") - 1 each
Type M- East Elevation (19'-6" x 2'-9") - 2 each
Type N- East Elevation (12'-3" x 8'-6") - 1 each
REPLACEMENT OF EXTERIOR DOORS
Temporary Facilities
Safety and Temporary Facilities
Aluminum Doors and Frames - Demolition, Supply and Install
Hardware - Supply and Install
REPLACEMENT OF INTERIOR DOORS
Metal Doors and Frames - Demolition, Supply and Install
Hardware - Supply and Install
REPLACEMENT OF INTERIOR ATHLETIC SURFACES
Athletic Flooring- Room D
Athletic Flooring- Squash Court A
Athletic Flooring- Squash Court B
Athletic Flooring- Gymnasium
Athletic Flooring- Gym C
Athletic Flooring- Weight Room
LOCKER AND BATHROOM REPLACEMENTS
Temporary Facilities
Safety and Temporary Facilities
Selective Demolition
Gypsum Wall Board - Ceilings- Showers
Ceramic Tile - Floors- Lower Level
Ceramic Tile - Floors- Upper Level
Ceramic Tile - Ceilings- Showers
Ceramic Tile - Floors - Natatorium
Toilet Partitions
Lockers and Benches
Toilet Accessories
Water Closets
Lavatories
Shower Pans
Urinals

UNIT
QNTY
UNIT
MEAS
1,350
1,600
250
520
3,000

1
1
90
1,064
234
42
83
14
405
39
810
108
41
41
108
104

1
1
8
8

34
34

2,000
700
700
10,200
850
200

1
1
1
1,300
9,500
300
1,300
3,600
26
150
36
28
22
3
11

SF
SF
SF
SF
SF

LS
LS
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF

LS
LS
EA
EA

EA
EA

SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF

LS
LS
LS
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SETS
SETS
SETS
EA
EA
EA
EA

MATL., LABOR, EQUIP.


UNIT
TOTAL
COST

2013-1432
1/14/2014
TOTAL COST
Including
O+P

11.50
11.50
11.50
11.50
11.50
Total

15,525.00
18,400.00
2,875.00
5,980.00
34,500.00
117,530.00

175,000.00

10,000.00
10,000.00
104.00
104.00
104.00
104.00
104.00
104.00
72.00
104.00
72.00
104.00
104.00
104.00
104.00
104.00
Total

10,000.00
10,000.00
9,360.00
110,656.00
24,336.00
4,368.00
8,632.00
1,456.00
29,160.00
4,056.00
58,320.00
11,232.00
4,264.00
4,264.00
11,232.00
10,816.00
312,152.00

475,000.00

5,000.00
5,000.00
4,800.00
1,400.00
Total

5,000.00
5,000.00
38,400.00
11,200.00
59,600.00

90,000.00

2,855.00
2,725.00
Total

97,070.00
92,650.00
189,720.00

280,000.00

42.80
42.80
42.80
42.80
42.80
42.80
Total

85,600.00
29,960.00
29,960.00
436,560.00
36,380.00
8,560.00
627,020.00

935,000.00

10,000.00
5,000.00
182,000.00
8.00
27.25
27.25
32.00
27.25
3,020.00
654.00
1,180.00
3,750.00
2,000.00
4,250.00
3,000.00

10,000.00
5,000.00
182,000.00
10,400.00
258,875.00
8,175.00
41,600.00
98,100.00
78,520.00
98,100.00
42,480.00
105,000.00
44,000.00
12,750.00
33,000.00

A-2

ROOSEVELT ISLAND OPERATING CORPORATION


PROJECT: Sportspark Recreational Facility
Projects Cost Estimate
DESCRIPTION OF WORK

Rough Carpentry- Miscellaneous Wood Blocking and Grounds


Finish Carpentry- Architectural Woodwork
Domestic Hot/Cold Water Distribution Piping, Valves, Fittings
Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning
SITE CONSTRUCTION (Atheltic and Recreational Surface)
Outdoor Basketball Court Surface Demolition
Outdoor Basketball Court Re-Surfacing
Pavement Markings
Site Improvements and Amenities
Planting
CONCRETE RESTORATION AND RECONSTRUCTION
Temporary Facilities
Safety and Temporary Facilities
Selective Demolition- North Elevation Walkway
Cast-In-Place Concrete- North Elevation Walkway
Concrete Restoration and Rehabilitation
Concrete Pavers Replacement- North Elevation Arcade
Concrete Restoration, Injection, Patching
HANDRAILS AND RAILINGS REPLACEMENT
Handrails and Railing
INTERIOR FINISHES AND CASEWORK
Architectural Woodwork
Gypsum Wall Board - Miscellaneous Repairs and Replacement
Lower Level- Partitions, Soffits, Doors, Frames
Upper Level- Partitions, Soffits, Doors, Frames
ATHLETIC EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT ALLOWANCE
Miscellaneous Athletic Equipment
FURNISHINGS REPLACEMENT ALLOWANCE
Furniture, Fixtures, and Equipment (Allowance)
SPECIAL CONSTRUCTION - POOL REHABILITATION
Temporary Facilities
Safety and Temporary Facilities
Selective Demolition
Pool Finishes Rehabilitation- Gunite, Liner
Pool Equipment- Pumps, Filtration, Chlorination
Plumbing
CONVEYING SYSTEMS - ELEVATOR UPGRADE
Elevator - Cab Upgrade
Scaffolding
HVAC UPGRADES AND REPLACEMENT
Mechanical Fans- 2,700 cfm
Mechanical Fans- 23,000 cfm
Mechanical Fans- 3,500 cfm
Mechanical Fans- 24,000 cfm
Mechanical Fans- 5,400 cfm
Mechanical Fans- 18,000 cfm
A/C Unit - 110,000 cfm
Exhaust Fans- 2,500 cfm
Heat Generation Equipment

UNIT
QNTY
UNIT
MEAS
1
1
1
1

5,740
5,740
1
1
1

1
1
3,440
3,440
1
3,440
400

260

1
2,000
9,800
300

1
1
5,000
5,000
1
1

1
1

1
1
1
1
1
1
1
6
74,254

LS
LS
LS
LS

SF
SF
LS
LS
LS

LS
LS
SF
SF
LS
SF
LF

LF

LS
SF
SF
SF

LS

LS

LS
LS
SF
SF
LS
LS

EA
LS

EA
EA
EA
EA
EA
EA
EA
EA
SF

MATL., LABOR, EQUIP.


UNIT
TOTAL
COST

2013-1432
1/14/2014
TOTAL COST
Including
O+P

8,720.00
43,600.00
90,000.00
147,000.00
Total

8,720.00
43,600.00
90,000.00
147,000.00
1,317,320.00

2,000,000.00

11.00
9.80
10,000.00
50,000.00
40,000.00
Total

63,140.00
56,252.00
10,000.00
50,000.00
40,000.00
219,392.00

325,000.00

5,000.00
5,000.00
15.00
15.00
40,000.00
22.00
30.00
Total

5,000.00
5,000.00
51,600.00
51,600.00
40,000.00
75,680.00
12,000.00
240,880.00

360,000.00

132.00
Total

34,320.00
34,320.00

50,000.00

43,600.00
8.00
3.40
3.40
Total

43,600.00
16,000.00
33,320.00
1,020.00
93,940.00

140,000.00

100,000.00
Total

100,000.00
100,000.00

150,000.00

40,000.00
Total

40,000.00
40,000.00

60,000.00

5,000.00
5,000.00
7.85
44.60
207,100.00
67,580.00
Total

5,000.00
5,000.00
39,250.00
223,000.00
207,100.00
67,580.00
546,930.00

800,000.00

81,500.00
20,000.00
Total

81,500.00
20,000.00
101,500.00

150,000.00

9,900.00
26,100.00
14,850.00
29,250.00
16,500.00
21,600.00
327,000.00
2,900.00
6.50

9,900.00
26,100.00
14,850.00
29,250.00
16,500.00
21,600.00
327,000.00
17,400.00
482,651.00

A-3

ROOSEVELT ISLAND OPERATING CORPORATION


PROJECT: Sportspark Recreational Facility
Projects Cost Estimate
UNIT
QNTY
UNIT
MEAS

DESCRIPTION OF WORK

Hydronic Pumps- 55 gpm


Hydronic Pumps- 460 gpm
HVAC Instrumentation and Controls
HVAC Insulation
Testing, Adjusting, and Balancing

2
2
74,254
74,254
74,254

ELECTRICAL POWER AND DISTRIBUTION UPGRADES


Lighting - East Lower Level
Lighting - West Lower Level
Lighting - East Upper Level
Lighting - West Upper Level
Demolish Electrical Panels and Install New- 100 amp
Demolish Electrical Panels and Install New- 225 amp
Demolish Electrical Panels and Install New- 400 amp
Demolish Electrical Panels and Install New- 800 amp
Distribution Wiring
Wiring Devices
Emergency Engine Generator
Transfer Switches

24,200
20,550
21,000
4,350
11
2
2
2
74,254
74,254
74,254
74,254

FIRE ALARM SYSTEM UPGRADES / REPLACEMENT


Fire Alarm System / Security System
Misc. Testing and Repairs

74,254 EA
1 LS

EA
EA
SF
SF
SF

SF
SF
SF
SF
EA
EA
EA
EA
SF
SF
SF
SF

MATL., LABOR, EQUIP.


UNIT
TOTAL
COST
5,100.00
12,500.00
2.85
0.75
1.50
Total

10,200.00
25,000.00
211,623.90
55,690.50
111,381.00
1,359,146.40

2,000,000.00

7.00
7.00
7.00
7.00
5,400.00
9,950.00
12,500.00
22,575.00
5.00
1.70
0.75
0.16
Total

169,400.00
143,850.00
147,000.00
30,450.00
59,400.00
19,900.00
25,000.00
45,150.00
371,270.00
126,231.80
55,690.50
11,880.64
1,205,222.94

1,800,000.00

7.50
5,000.00
Total

556,905.00
5,000.00
561,905.00

840,000.00

11,008,083.84

16,440,000.00

SUBTOTAL
GENERAL CONDITIONS - 10%

11,008,083.84
1,100,808.38

SUBTOTAL
OVERHEAD & PROFIT - 8%

12,108,892.22
968,711.38

SUBTOTAL
DESIGN CONTINGENCY - 15%

13,077,603.60
1,961,640.54

SUBTOTAL
ESCALATION TO THE MID-POINT (3%/year)- 3%

15,039,244.14
451,177.32

SUBTOTAL
BOND 2%

15,490,421.47
309,808.43

SUBTOTAL
INSURANCE 4%

15,800,229.90
632,009.20

TOTAL PROJECT COST

2013-1432
1/14/2014
TOTAL COST
Including
O+P

16,432,239.09

16,440,000

A-4

ROOSEVELT ISLAND OPERATING CORPORATION


PROJECT: Sportspark Recreational Facility
Replacement Cost Estimate
CODE

2013-1432
12/3/2013
UNIT COST / SF

DESCRIPTION OF WORK

TOTAL
COST

Sitework

8.30 /SF

616,308.20

2.1

Site Utilities

4.90 /SF

363,844.60

2.2

Demolition

25.43 /SF

1,888,279.22

Concrete

11.40 /SF

846,495.60

Masonry

32.25 /SF

2,394,691.50

Metals

22.65 /SF

1,681,853.10

Woods and Plastics

10.28 /SF

763,331.12

Thermal and Moisture Protection

18.35 /SF

1,362,560.90

Doors and Windows

12.80 /SF

950,451.20

Finishes

19.50 /SF

1,447,953.00

10

Specialties

3.90 /SF

289,590.60

11

Equipment

6.80 /SF

504,927.20

12

Furnishings

6.20 /SF

460,374.80

13

Special Construction

48.50 /SF

3,601,319.00

14

Conveying Systems

2.54 /SF

188,605.16

15.3

Sprinklers

4.45 /SF

330,430.30

15.4

Plumbing

13.10 /SF

972,727.40

15.5

HVAC

33.40 /SF

2,480,083.60

16

Electrical

21.25 /SF

1,577,897.50

17

Technology

17.45 /SF

1,295,732.30

SUBTOTAL

24,017,456

GENERAL CONDITIONS - 10%

2,401,746

SUBTOTAL

26,419,202

OVERHEAD & PROFIT - 8%

2,113,536

SUBTOTAL

28,532,738

DESIGN CONTINGENCY - 15%

4,279,911

SUBTOTAL

32,812,649

ESCALATION TO THE MID-POINT (3%/year)- 3%

984,379

SUBTOTAL

33,797,028

BOND- 2%

675,941

SUBTOTAL

34,472,969

INSURANCE- 4%

TOTAL PROJECT COST

1,378,919

$483

/SF

35,851,888

B-1

You might also like