Professional Documents
Culture Documents
INTRODUCTION:
Company Act, 2013 has brought in number of new compliance norms for listed companies.
The Act imbibes the spirit of listed agreement and lays strict ruled for the listed entities to
traverse in the coming times.
Responding to the Companies Act, 2013 SEBI has its board meeting held on February 13,
2014 reviewed the Corporate Governance norms for listed Companies. SEBI vide a press
release has announced that the Board has approved the Proposals to amend the Listing
Agreement with respect to corporate governance norms for listed companies. The
amendments, inter-alia, propose to align the provisions of listing agreement with the
provisions of the newly enacted companies Act, 2013 and also provide additional
requirements to strengthen the corporate governance framework for listed companies in India.
The amendments shall be made applicable to all listed companies with effect from October
01, 2014.
DEFINITION:
Listed company means a company which has any of its securities listed on any recognized
stock exchange (Section 2(52))
Securities means the securities as defines in clause (h) of section 2 of the Securities
Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956.
As per clause (h) of section 2 of SCRA, 1956 Securities include:
Shares, scrip, stocks, bonds, debentured, debenture stock or other marketable securities of
like nature in or any incorporated company or other corporate;
(ia) derivative;
(ib) units or any other instrument issued by any collective investments scheme to the
investors in such schemes;
(ic) security receipt as defines in clause (zg) of section 2 of the Securisation and
Reconstruction of Finance Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002;
(id) units or any other such instrument issued to the investors uder any mutual fund scheme;
Government securities;
Such other instruments as may be declared by the central Government to be securities; and
Rights or interest in securities.
Every company making public offer shall make an application to at least one stock exchange
before making the public offer. This is duty of company to obtain permission of stock
exchange or stock exchanges for the dealing of securities there.
Prospectus for the public offer shall also state the name or names of the stock exchange in
which application for dealing of the securities has been made.
All money received on application from the public for subscription of the securities shall be
kept in a separate bank account in a schedule bank. This money shall not be utilised for any
purpose other than
For adjustment against allotment of securities where the permission from the stock exchanges
named in prospectus has been received; or
For repayment of money within the time specified by the Securities and Exchange Board,
where the company is for any other reason unable to allot securities.
A company may pay commission to any person in connection with the subscription to its
securities subject to such conditions as may be prescribed.
Any condition which require or bind any applicant for securities to waive compliance with
any of the requirement of this section shall be void.
If a default is made in complying with the provisions of this section, the company shall be
punishable with a fine which shall not be less than five lakh rupees but which may extend to
fifty lakh rupees and every officer of the company who is in default shall be punishable with
imprisonment for a term which may extend to one year or with fine which shall not be less
than fifty thousand rupees but which may extend to three lakh rupees, or with both.
Where, instrument of transfer has been lost or has not been delivered, the company may
register the transfer on an indemnity bond.
On receipt of intimation, a company has power to register transmission of any right to
securities by operation of law from any person to whom such right has been transmitted.
Where an application is made by transferor alone and relates to partly paid shares, the transfer
shall be registered by the company only after giving notice of the application to the
transferee, and transferee gives no objection to the transfer within two weeks from the receipt
of notice.
The transfer of any security or other interest of a deceased person in a company made by his
legal representative shall be valid as if he had been the holder at the time of the execution of
the instrument of transfer.
PENAL PROVISION:
Where any default is made under this section, the company shall be punishable with fine
which shall not be less than twenty-five thousand rupees but which may extend to five lakh
rupees and every officer of the company who is in default shall be punishable with fine which
shall not be less than ten thousand rupees but which may extend to one lakh rupees.
Without prejudice to any liability under the Depositories Act, 1996, where any depository or
depository participant, with an intention to defraud a person, has transferred shares, it shall be
liable under section 447.
If a private company limited by shares refuses to register the transfer or transmission of any
securities or interest of a member in the company, it shall, send a notice of the refusal to
transferor, transferee or person sending intimation giving reason for such refusal. This
intimation shall be send within a period of thirty days from the date of receipt of instrument
of transfer or intimidation for transmission.
The transferee may appeal to the tribunal against the refusal within a period of thirty days
from the date of receipt of the notice. Where no notice has been send by the company,
transferee may appeal to the tribunal within a period of sixty days from the date on which the
instrument of transfer or intimation of transmission was delivered to the company.
If a public company without sufficient cause refuses to register the transfer of securities
within a period of thirty days from the date on which the instrument of transfer or the
intimation of transmission, as the case may be, is delivered to the company, the transferee
may, within a period of sixty days of such refusal or where no intimation has been received
from the company, within ninety days of the delivery of the instrument of transfer or
intimation of transmission, appeal to the Tribunal.
The tribunal after hearing the parties, may either dismiss the appeal or by order
(a) Direct that the transfer or transmission shall be registered by the company and company
shall comply with such order within a period of ten days of receipt of the order; or
(b) Direct rectification of the register and also direct the company to pay damages sustained
by any party.
If a person contravenes the order of the Tribunal under this section, he shall be punishable
with imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than one year but which may extend to
three years and with fine which shall not be less than one lakh rupees but which may extend
to five lakh rupees.
The person aggrieved, or any member of the company, or the company may appeal to the
Tribunal, or to a competent court outside India, specified by the Central Government by
notification, in respect of foreign members or debentures holders residing outside India, for
rectification of the register in following circumstances
(i)
If the name of any person is without sufficient cause entered in the register of
members of a company; or
(ii)
If the name of any person after having been entered in the register is without
If a default is made or unnecessary delay takes place in entering in the register, the
shall not be less than one lakh rupees but which may extend to three lakh rupees, or with
both.
DELISTING
As stated above delisting of securities means removal of the securities of a listed company
from the stock exchange. It may happen either when the company does not comply with the
guidelines of the stock exchange, or that the company has not witnessed trading for years, or
that it voluntary wants to get delisted or in case of merger or acquisition of a company
with/by some other company. So, broadly it can be classified under two head:
1. Compulsory delisting.
2. Voluntary delisting.
The shareholders will be provided with an exit opportunity by the promoters or those who are
in the control of the management.
Companies can get delisted from all stock exchanges following the substantial acquisition of
shares. The regulation state that if the public shareholding slides to 10 per cent or less of the
voting capital of the company, the acquirer making the offer, has the option to buy the
outstanding shares from the remaining shareholders at the same offer price.
An exit price mechanism called the book-building method is used by the delisted companies
to derive to the price at which the share will be brought into and that which will be paid to the
shareholders. However, an exit opportunity need not be given in cases where securities
continue to be listed in a stock exchange having nation wide trading terminals.
Under the existing SEBI takeover code, an acquirer is required to make an offer to buy
securities at the same offer price. However, here the exit price is based on the average of the
preceding 26-week high and low prices.
The acquirer is required to allow a further period of 6 months for any of the remaining
shareholders to tender securities at the same price. The stock exchange monitors the
possibility of any price manipulation and keeps under special watch the securities for which
announcement for delisting has been made.
This mechanism however is not seen as beneficial in depressed Indian market conditions as
the price arrived through this principle may not adequately compensate the shareholder for
the permanent loss of investment opportunity, especially in a company whose shares are
regarded as value investment.
The SEBI (Delisting of Securities) Guidelines- 2003 is the regulating Act framing the
guidelines and the procedure for delisting of securities. Under this the prescribed procedure
is:
1. The decision on delisting should be taken by shareholders though a special resolution in
case of voluntary delisting & though a panel to be constituted by the exchange comprising the
following in case of compulsory delisting:
Two directors/ officers of the exchange (one director to be a public representative).
One representative of the investors.
One representative from the Central government (Department of Company Affairs) /
regional director/ Registrar of Companies.
CONCLUSION
There was a time not very long ago when there was no regulating agency like SEBI. Trading
was done then also but then it was a one way route. Every company that issues shares to the
public is required to have its shares listed on a recognised stock exchange. In 1956, the
Government of India enacted a law called Securities Contracts (Regulations), 1956, which
came into force with effect from February 1957. Among other things, this law regulated
operations of stock exchanges and listing of public issues. The Controller of Capital Issues
fixed the price of shares issued by any company. Normally, the Controller used to permit a
small premium that could be charged by a company while issuing shares to the public.
However, with the changing economic scenario and with the opening up of the Indian
economy, the country witnessed huge influx of foreign capital. This resulted in growth in the
number of listing of companies on the stock exchanges. Alternatively it also laid to demand
from several India-based MNCs that they should be permitted to delist their shares. The
reason remains the non-performance of the shares on the stock exchange and in case of
merger and acquisition of one company with the other. To consider the prevailing position in
respect of delisting, SEBI appointed a committee to study the whole issue and, as a result,
issued guidelines for delisting of securities in 2003.
However, in the present scenario, if the market is studied minutely many MNC seeks to get
their shares delisted at the expense of those investor who themselves are worried seeing their
hard earned money whooping in number game. The reason being, the exist route method
applied in case of voluntary delisting. Under the present norms the exist price is decided on
the basis of price of companys shares on 26 weeks highs and lows and in this market
condition these companies are finding it profitable to buy back their shares at this price. In
this scenario SEBI should look after any such possibility of playing fraud on the investors by
these big companies.