Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PHILOSOPHY
PLOTINOS
OF
NEW
THEOSOPHICAL
244
YORK
PUBLISHING
LENOX
AVENUE.
Co.
Entered
according
to
Act
DUNLAP
In
the
Office
of
of
Congress,
PRINTING
the
Librarian
in
the
year
1896,
by
the
COMPANY,
of
Congress
at
Washington,
D.
C.
PLOTINOS.
OF
PHILOSOPHY
THE
INDEX,
Page
PLATONISM
I.
Chapter
..."
1.
Plato's
2.
The
Archetypal
3.
The
World
6. The
Human
2.
The
3. The
4. The
3
3
Soul
6
6
Aristotle
and
Deity
Psychology
7
7
8
.-
Ethics
STOICISM
1.
2.
The
3.
Cosmology
4.
Ethics
the
Stoics
Dialectic
Aristotelian
9
10
ii
EMANATIONISM
IV.
Chapter
ARISTOTELIANISM
III.
Chapter
of Ideas
Rank
II.
Plato
of Ideas
World
of Matter
Universe
1.
Realms
Three
4. The
5. The
Chapter
1.
The
Date
2.
Relation
of
12
Christianity
to
3. Difference
4. Hermetic
12
Hermes
from
12
Platonism
14
Conceptions
14
5. Cosmology
6. Ethics
14
7. Spiritual Destiny
15
AMMONIUS
V.
Chapter
THEIR
1.
Ammonius
2.
Plotinos
3.
Relation
4.
The
SAKKAS,
RELATION
TO
VI.
AND
PLOTINOS,
CHRISTIANITY
17
Sakkas
17
17
Christianity
Recognition of the Authority
5. Relation
Chapter
15
18
to
to
MIKROKOSM
1.
The
2.
Mikrokosm
3.
Psychology
Cosmological
of Plato
20
Philosophy
Greek
AND
Contemplative
20
MAKROKOSM
22
Life
r
y.
_v
.
4.
22
22
.r/v1r.'.
23
ttS"f^ftttW-JiiU
M
.
'
Import
of
Psychology
146280
24
INDEX.
Page
Chanter
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
VII.
THE
FIRST
GOD
THE
REALM,
and the Many
The One
The God
Above
Cognisability
The Nomenclative
Symbol for the Divinity
The God
is the First Cause
The
God's
Necessity to Love
of Begetting
Manner
and
Relation of Cause
World
THE
Chapter VIII.
SECOND
GOD,
REALM,
26
26
26
27
27
27
28
28
COSMIC
MIND
1.
2.
Chapter
1.
2.
30
THE
IX.
THIRD
REALM,
Trinity : Over-God,
Co-equality of Souls
The
Saturn,
30
30
THE
SOUL
32
and
Zeus-Rhea
32
33
World-Soul
Over-Soul
Transcendent
The
4.
and
Over-Soul
5. Inter-relation of
3. The
Chapter
1.
2.
FOURTH
THE
X.
33
34
Souls
34
REASON
REALM,
Mind
Individual
World-Souls
Other
36
SENSE
FIFTH
THE
REALM,
Senses of the Over-Soul
1. The
2.
Unity of Souls in the Fifth Realm
Sense-Realm
3. Human
and Physical Senses
Celestial
4.
Chapter
XI.
5. Senses
Chapter XII.
37
37
37
37
38
of Animals
THE
SIXTH
39
REALM,
VITALITY
Sixth ivealm
of the Over-Soul
Realm
Sixth
The
2.
of Sympathy
Doctrine
3. The
Beautiful
The
4.
Vaticination
5. Astrology and
1.
7. The
1.
39
39
40
40
4i
Will
Daemon
Chapter XIII.
THE
39
39
The
6. Free
36
36
42
SEVENTH
Evil
MATTER....
REALM,
"
43
43
2.
Uncognisability of Matter
44
3.
of Matter
Intelligibility
44
Hi
INDEX.
Page
1.
2.
REINCARNATION
XIV.
Chapter
Need
for
46
Three
Factors
3.
4.
Objection
from
5.
Objection
from
46
Oblivion
47
Suicide
47
ETHICS
XV.
Chapter
2.
46
Justice
The
1.
45
Reincarnation
Virtue
and
48
Vice
of
Philosophy
48
Sin
49
"
3.
The
Path
4.
The
Daemon
5.
Ecstasy
51
6.
Happiness
52
Chapter
XVI.
1.
The
2.
Human
Chapter
1.
Enlightenment
of
of
Conscience
50
AESTHETICS
God,
54
Over-Beautiful
the
"
Beauty
XVII.
Pagan
Monotheism
3.
Augustine's
4.
The
Last
54
54
PLOTINOS
AND
PAGANISM
56
Deities
2.
49
56
56
Debt
Light
to
ot
Plotinos
Greece
56
56
I.
CHAPTER
PLATONISM.
We
felt
the
by
most
cursory
it is
as
is the
"genesis,"
the
eternal
of
unity,
will
"
has
true
"
We
But
knowable
and
the
represented
in
witnessed
matter,
hule,"
"
"
"
apply
must
of
realm
third
which
intelligible world,
being,
reason,
the
alone
"
and
which
istence,"
ex-
three
world
the
of
realms
before
however,
creation
the
"
existence
ed.
form-
was
which,
existence,
of
formless,
the
to
which
that
"
of the
world
cause,
the
; and
we
One
the
be
may
definite
"
the~Father,
world
of
sense-
from
phuetai,"
of
tinction
dis-
Unlimited.
the
fittingly
which
the
of
this
reduce
that
the
on
in which
it becomes
that
(matter),
world),
which
it is copied
God,
world).
(the intelligible
the
it grows,"
the
the
whence
hothen
reason,
(the
that
and
in
categories
contrary,
"
recognizes
thus
becomes
thing
and
existed
having
distinguished
as
world.
of the phenomenal
be
formation
Plato
the
on
reach
thus
only
or
such,
as
Ousia."
Logos,
on,
chaotic
odorless,
can
Ontos
Manifold,
The
their
of
"
world.
phenomenal
Unity
philosophy
none
ousia,
to
Limited
which
Becoming
of
process
the
these
fitting description
united
mixture,
lem
prob-
of
Which
finite
further
the
are
both
their
"
any
was
terms,
conceptions
truth
their
to
proceeded
He
these
so
is
attributed
he, be
is one,
; but
Being,
wholly.
Plato
its Pythagorean
of
Earlier
The
inasmuch
Greek
question
this
to
that
the
reveals
qualities.
its
can
and
noeton."
to
object
every
in
distinction?
answers
"
sense-world
for
which
that
aistheton,"
"to
knowable,"
manifold
world.
both
number,
"
Many
the
"becoming,"
to
is
and
satisfied
phenomenal
Many
the
thought
not,
contrary,
the
of
various
conclusions
As
examination
yet
fundamental
most
could
"
object,
an
given
had
the
One
of the
the
senses,
realms
great
two
"sensible"
understood,
be
can
into
existence
divides
which
philosophy.
Greek
of
sketch
Plato
his.
preceded
in our
nary
prelimi-
Plato
with
immediately
which
that
system
which
philosophy
of
systems
his
in
united
Plato
"
begin
therefore
may
be
the
in
valuable
was
Realms.
Three
Plato's
i.
thus,
must
"
the
not
"
to
is the
; matter
"
ho
En
world
fail
noeton."
"
gignetai
analyze
The
and
this
phrase
the
nurse,
of
God
intelligible
given
above,
comitant
con-
of
gignomenon,"
to
offspring
is the
to
mother
and
the
Matter.
world,
"that
this
from
The
Philosophy of Plotinos.
"
which
it is copied
implies that somebody
copies something :
that the Deity copies the Ideas or archetypes. There
is then,
the intelligibleworld
above
still
of exa
higher realm
istence,
proper
the Deity : which, in the Pythagorean
duced
terminology adwould
be the Mind, the
above
the
Nous,"
principle or
"
"
"
world.
four realms of existence : the Deity, the world
of Ideas, the world
of Sense, and
Matter.
But as the latter
realm has ceased
the
exist
since
to
creation of the phenomenal
world
three realms
as
of existence, which
such, there remain
sometimes
referred to as the Platonic Trinity :
are
Nous"
or
the Deity, the intelligible
world
of Ideas, and
the Sense-world
the
How
loose and
sensible," to aisthetikon."
inaccurate
such an appellation is,is clear from the fact that Plato himself did
not
recognize it. The
Sense-world, the supposititious third
member
of the Trinity, is the only-begotten Son, "Huios
monothe
the
of
Eikon
aidion
tou
Deity,
genes
Theou," "Zoon
kai noeton," it is a
second
future
before its genesis.
God,
created
and
after it ; a
blessed deity."
As
the world
of Ideas
Zoon
is a
aidion kai noeton,". an
eternal and intelligible
of Sense is a
organism," so the world
Zoon
ennoun," an
reasonable
intelligible
organism," a
living
being, the creating principleof "Nous," Reason, having reduced
the chaotic, necessary,
and
to
alogos," irrational Matter
an
of
the
world
of
Ideas.
image
Thus
of the One
the problem
and
the Many
was
apparently
solved : every
object being One, in view of its similarityto the
Idea according to which, as a pattern, it has been created ; and
had
been
which
the
Manifold, in view of the formless matter
condition
of its origination.
cause
We
'
"
have
thus
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
The
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
Platonism.
"
"
One
of Matter." It the Intelligible
world, the
is
nonexis real existence, it follows that Matter, the
Many,"
istence.
It is therefore absurd to call Plato's philosophical system
the
has
dualism.
only
Hule,"
indeterminate,
a
Matter,
ative
negbe apprehended
predicates,it lacks form and quality,and cannot
It can
wardness,
only be space, the form of outby the senses.
It
is
and unordered
an
that is,coexistence
sequence.
be impressed upon
it. It
to
form waiting for a content
empty
sity,
necesis nothing, an abstraction from reality; yet it is absolute
able
the divine power,
to
and though not able to oppose
yet
its works.
mar
World
3. The
"
"
beautiful world *
Universe.
The Sense- world is the most
possible,being framed according to the most
perfectof patterns,5
in
and
He
the
best
was
a
cause.
good ;
good being no
by
but
in relation to anything ever
resides,
being without this
envy
like himself as possible."We
he wished
as
everything to become
that the Sense-world
an
was
intelligible
organism," "Zoon
saw
acteristic
ennoun."
It is consequently able to think: and this is the charof mind, and mind
exists in a soul, and
soul in a
a
should not rule the elder,and mind rules
body. As the younger
the body, the mind
older than the body of the
of the world was
is therefore a living being, with a rational
world.
The
Universe
soul interpenetrating
the
its body.
It regulates and harmonizes
bodies partake of the physical Universe,
world ; for as human
do human
souls proceed from the souls of the Universe.
so
4.
The
"
"
"
The
Universe
thus
is formed
in two
circles with a
ed
inner
circle
is subdividcommon
planes
into seven
circles moving in directions opposite to that of the
Here
have the fixed stars and the seven
outer
one.
we
planets
with their orbits.
created
centre, in different
5. The Rank
remains
for us
; the
of Ideas.
of Ideas it
Having explained the nature
All
to describe the rank and dignity they occupy.
world." an "intelligible
together they form an "intelligible
place"
an
"intelligible
organism," "Kosmos
noetos," a "Topos noetos,"
of a thing is not
Zoon
noeton."
The cause
the condition
of
a
its existence, but its purpose
and
the
ultimate
of
;
purpose
poses
puris the ruler of all other
Ideas,
basileus," the king of
Plato combined
here
the Mind
of
heaven,
Dophia, Zeus."
Anaxagoras, and the Good
/-vgathon," of the Megareans and
into an
Sokrates
somewhat
Epekeina tes Ousias," a
beyond
existence" an existence beyond all Being, the Ideas partaking of
ousia."
This Being is both Mind
and
Being,
Good
: a
con)
scious good Being, the Idea, the absolute Unity excluding all,
Manifoldness, a glorious fulfilment of the Eleatic dreams.
Such :
the
him
in
of
lifts
a
conception
Deity
tence,
a
separate realm of exisabove all other Ideas soever.
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
That
this was
Plato's conception has been much
doubted.
He,
Creator, has been identified with the Idea of the Good, as
both are
called by Plato
the best of the intelligible
and
nally
eterexisting beings." He is himself the pattern he copies in
the
"
The
Philosophy of Plotinos.
The
the creation, since he is said to copy
eternal pattern.
an
telligible
world
is therefore called a
sensible God," an
image of the inand an
image of the eternal gods." Zeller thinks
tence
the ideas cannot
depend on God without affectingtheir self-exisbe dependent on the ideas, for the same
son,
reacannot
; God
and both cannot
be co-ordinate
without creating a dualism
Plato knows
nothing of. Consequently, God and the Idea of
culties
diffithe Good
identical. This view of Zeller's creates
more
are
than it explains ; for it does not account
for the language
it the Idea of
quoted above, and it permits us to ask, why was
itself the
the Good
other
which
took
Idea
and not some
upon
office of a Creator ? Why
do not several Ideas create
separate
universes?
ly
And
besides, a Creator such as we have described is absoluteneeded by Plato in his Physics. The Ideas are true existence,
shall
How
and Matter
is non-existence
separate.
; and both are
it a rational
the rational principleinfuse itselfinto matter
to make
contemplates the Idea, genorganism, unless the God who
erates
nates
incarin
and
to
them
so
speak,
himself,
thus,
a
as
poet
to
them ? For Plato has no
principleof Emanationism
"
"
"
"
"
"
vice
Akolasia," intemperance. Lastly, we\
\
the courageous
have the third part of the soul, "to Thumoeides"
the
presumably
secondary deities,
part of the soul, prepared by
moderate
cise
exerof whose
the World-Soul, and this is the organ
as
opposed to the vice
is the virtue
Andria," courage,
'positehabits
"
is the
"
The
fourth
virtue, Dikaiosune," justice,
Deilia," cowardice.
it
three virtues,and when
the above
is the right relation between
towards
Hosiotes," holiness or
is exercised
God, it becomes
it
is
man's
end
resemble
to
God, who is absolutely
piety, since
health
and
the
order and
good. This is happiness. Virtue is
harmony of the soul, and should therefore be followed irrespec"
"
"
Platonism.
tive
of
than
to
is
just
incarnation
next
soul
that
in
persisted
of
chose
Pleasure
is
is
If
from
and
itself
ways,
the
be
If
in
the
worse
demands
soul
the
of
good
antithetically
The
of
wise
exists
soul
all
erred,
man
woman
incarnation
if
the
would
several
be
incarnations
become
soon
forms
nently
perma-
reincarnating.
:
are
of
God
patent.
through
for
would
is
all.
body
next
it
soul
souls
soul
the
necessity
of
is
injustice
transmigrates
the
howeyer
necessarily
not
be
philosophy,
the
health
in
evil
to
cannot
it
justice.
its
of
study
life
life;
would
animal.
an
the
freed
Pleasure
this
this
inexorable
to
do
philosophy
injustice
earth,
on
after
and
to
man.
consequently
according
his
life
for
This
another.
entire
single
before
both
from
the
of
in
Yet,
it
suffer
rationality
sanctions
or
consequences
it
may
indeed
be
in
pleasurable
opposed
to
all
true
evil
eration
mod-
themselves.
insight.
CHAPTER
II.
ARISTOTELIANISM.
Plato
i.
will
be
all
the
his
were
agreed
mother
"
Matter
ho.w
With
En
or
Matter,
Plato
to
With
Plato,
participated
With
in
the
things
are
only
These
universals
Matter,
united
Reality
invariable
which
results
reality,
the
moved,
cal, having
to
moves
We
union
passive.
of
all the
for
every
a
of
of
the
haunted
by,
Reality
becomes
and
which
is thus
essence,
"
and
which
and
all
the
the
real.
in
They
form.
energeia,"
and
larize
particu-
aim
purposive
the
"
appearance
only
of
essence
what
it
is
the
the
the
restated
phenomena
might
the
be
realisation
that
recurring
of
velopment,
de-
lem
prob-
philosophy
being,
exist
of
was
terms.
new
;
to
in
principles.
is
ever
in
to
through
moved
Greek
which
Many,
solution
ranging
Aristotle
to
solved
finally
Plato
and
moving
original
tion,
mo-
existence.
impressed
were
activity,
of
real
satisfactory
Ideas
magnet
reason
is
In
the
teleologi-
is
the
as
which
the
mover
very
statue
shape.
and
reality
moves,
is
why
the
is
he
matter
This
the
the
the
is the
closely
so
as
and
all
it
which
are
principle.
substance,"
bronze
which
of
here
which
One
them.
third
Thus
teleological
creation,
conception
immanence
denied
matter,
distinguish
to
change
principle
have
with
einai
aim
question
we
octaves
This
the
of
may
or
as
perceptible
the
unanswered
Matter
"
union
and
steel.
that
objectively
energy,
or
both
we
have
Plato's
is
the
end
the
Form,
from
active
an
now
and
therefore,
the
and
in
World
the
energy,
themselves
results
from
"
species,
monism
from
apart
was
according
a
things.
potentiality,
or
that
their
all
the
realise
into
as
which."
dualism.
above
them
of
than
as
self-existent,
in
undeveloped
real
moie
ground
principle,
"out
described
existence
participated
themselves
ference
dif-
they
separate.
vo'id, "in which"
hou,"
interpreted
were
all objective
of
Ex
transcendent
were
the
incomplete,
"
be
be
They
essence
is
may
may
Ideas
which
the
system
Here
emptiness,
is much
Aristotle,
them.
Aristotle,
it
and
feminine
world.
possibility,
former's
the
with
contact
the
cause,
the
Matter
and
latter's
the
though
even
Aristotle
indeterminate,
was
of
Aristotle
to
of
points
Matter
nurse
power
the
his
is non-existence,
according
understand
to
concomitant
"
dunamis
notice
that
the
Plato,
order
Master.
great
and
In
"
to
from
Plurality, the
With
"
Aristotle.
advantageous
Both
of
and
"
"
essence.
"
To
ousia,"
ti
en
The
A ristotelianism.
inert.
"
becoming
"
of Plato
has
"
become
"
"
things.
The
"
"
the source
the limitation of space.
Thus
of movement
is found
outside of the substances
moved.
It cannot
cause
cause
motion, beend
aimed
is
instance
of
this
at
an
and
the
every
process,
the
of
the world is its final end,
prime Mover
best, the efficient
All realitylies between
Matter and the prime Mover
after
cause.
which
strives
and
which
desires.
The
everything
everything
Mover
all
is One, devoid of
prime
multiplicity:therefore immortal,
it is the
desiring nothing, desired of all. On this account
pure,
end
of scientific cognition ; and because
and
eternal,
eternally
desired of all,no
and
unification between
God
his world
yond
beeternal desire is possible. The
divine Mind
thinks of itself
eternally: in it thinker and thought are
eternally one, and at
of something else it would
rest ; ^f it thought of creation or
not
be at rest.
Human
speculationor contemplation of pure thought
is the most
divine occupation possible to man,
re-discovering
in blissful rest.
God
Thus
God
is the end of human
plation,
contemof
thought
thought.
The
Idea of Ideas ; according
an
Deity, according to Plato, was
ity,
of all realto Aristotle,it was
a self-contained
prime Mover
transcendent
his world.
And
this world
above
lay between
himself and Matter, opposed to him, because
excluded
from him.
The
that of
of the Deity of Aristotle is the same
name
as
claims
these
The
The
Mind.
and
Aristotle
take
to
Good,
Plato,
from
Plato but from
names
not
Deity
Anaxagoras, from whose
Plato has also borrowed
Yet it
the name
of his Idea of Ideas.
is true that the Deity of Aristotle is nearer
to that of Anaxagoras
than that of Plato ; for the former
the all-includingend
one
was
in allreality.
of all the "Logoi" of things, the principle of motion
The Psychology.The
psychology of Aristotle is radically
is a mikrokosm
different from
that of Plato.
Man
; his soul
theless,
unites all the faculties of other orders of living beings. Neversoul may
the human
be divided into two parts: that which
pre-existsand survives the body, and that which dies with it. The
in general. It is the faculty
former
is called
Nous," reason,
which
excels
all
man
by
living beings. The latter is subdivided
into five
Each
souls
ists
exor
planes of consciousness.
organ
in view of some
end, which is an activity: so the body ex3.
"
"
"
"
The
ists
soul.
the
for
The
"
"
central
"
dunamis
hand
parts
two
"
is
"
active
the
alone
is represented
"
no
place
since
God,
rapt
in
sphere
direct
himself
consider
will
4.
only one,
elements,
as
have
seven.
The
Ethics.
As
"
Ethics
we
in
Plato's
in
finds
and
this
Aristotle's
his
as
here
; he
adds
without
we
this
and
subordinate
have
the
two
only
stituent
conaddition, we
six
in
and
logy
psycho-
with
agree
with
empiricist
them
to
"
God
In
take
we
one,
true
son
rea-
Nous
and
seven
connected
the
"
psychology
Ethics
intimately
five virtues
soul
cosmology
of
other
active
Universe.
to
body
system
be
philosophies,
found
Aristotle's
as
to
be
the
on
cosmology
of
the
ed
divid-
passive
active
Aristotle's
the
is however
account
other
man
little
saw
Aristotle
will
counting
or
little does
so
agree,
Plato's
then
be
; the
The
motive
loco-
self-activity.
inconsistent.
cosmology
So far, then, the human
soul is composed
of
If however
souls
planes of consciousness.
or
lowest
"
may
forms
unification
transcended
must
we
in
although
such
up
receives
or
With
and
reason
forms
generates
eternal
existence.
divine,
for
active
and
between
possess.
desire,
faculty,
"
energeia
as
found
and
rasa
substantial
has
its highest
passive
similating
as-
centre
not
and
human
"
and
common
do
appetitive,"
memory,
distinctively
tabula
"
"
difference
a
former
sensitive,"
include
the
have
in
possesses
vegetable
The
latter
the
man
"
the
"
souls
souls.
the
"
the
souls,
itself, the
reason
"
; which
which
into
"
share
men
"
heart
"
plants
is that
the
organ,
animals,
The
animals
and
plants
and
reproductive
or
Plotinos.
of
lowest
two
animals
with
common
Philosophy
either.
his
; he
other
chology.
psy-
finds
virtues
he
much
the
habit
mean
his
to
define
various
with
virtues
what
its
its powers,
the
dianoetic
he
and
will
neglect?
to
natural
and
virtues
of
as
be
being
; but
He
are.
every
man's
the
define
is
the
here
these
But
we
quality
have
all-important
it
He
he
vides
di-
forgets
only
rational
characteristic
highest.
deduce
to
self-evident.
of which
truth-conception,
of intelligible principles
grasp
good
of
pretends
as
of
immediate
The
it
assumes
dianoetic
the
He
activity.
human
finally
; but
into dianoetic
gradations
highest.
that
of
experience
from
out
points
the
Nous,"
"
reaches
is
already
virtues.
the
development
his
reason,
remarked
CHAPTER
III.
STOICISM.
Stoics
the
that
of
the
it
as
with
for
ready-made
Sokrates,
and
looking
with
the
its treats
of
is divided
then
is
Doing
errors.
categories,
"
orthos
they
"
Logos
rasa"
at
essence
images
the
Final
and
of
product
Cause,
of
of
which
"
pure
of
are
Energeia,"
Platonic
best
of
of
only
or
reason,"
logical
mind
from
or
Nous
but
Aristotle
Efficient
"; they
do
only
real
the
was
Cause
principles, the
They
tal
men-
is
nothing
is nothing
telian
Aristo-
these
with
two
sity.
neces-
being
Ideas
that
avoid
Aristotle's
reality
inseparable.
"
of
which
Form,
business
to
right
assent,
us
Logic
how
the
cause
be-
conceived
; its
"
truth,
shows
Reality
product
from
Logic,
four
first
abstraction
or
This
space.
named
proper
sensation,
instead
; the
the
ence
prefer-
they borrow
teaching
compelling
from
principles, Matter,
now
ones,
of
reflection
matter
four
is
passive
anything
the
Thus,
occupying
of
quality
all
impressions.
or
corporeal
except
but
criterion
quality
have
we
man.
which
this
is already
Dialectic
Ethics,
to
originates
first.
of
wise
"explicit" "Prophorikos."
and
with
the
Knowledge
"tabula
Rhetoric
followers
by
is
which
reason,
and
reach
It
changes.
Logos,"
away
almost
Herakleitos.
philosophy
Dialectic
Their
"
secondary
only
however
Dialectic
reasoning.
following
into
theoretic
characterized
being
Dialectic.
"
in
were
in
virtuous
the
movement
combine
to
themselves
of
tics
Peripate-
the
from
Physics
or
former
Epicureans
their
pattern
the
"Endiathetos"
"implicit"
as
as
of
abstract
over
Aristotelian
Aristotle
the
sics."
"Phy-
Plato
all
life, than
practical
considered
centuries,
Ethics
for
The
2.
on
several
for
him
and
Stoics
their
and
theirs
Epicureans,
borrow
to
they
beginners
the
were
lasted
Ethics
in
interest
this
or
Aristotle,
from
the
the
preferred
They
discussions.
In
Ethics,
in
interested
nized
recog-
either
for
the
Aristotle
glance
remained
and
Besides,
before.
given
was
It
and
called
comprehensive
cendence
trans-
while
than
age
Plato,
the
things
Deity,
that
so
Stoics
later
Stoics
the
in
the
ended.
was
immanence
world,
to
latter's
Academicians,
and
more
belong
the
work
constructive
the
Dialectics,"
Stoics
the
Aristotle,
what
"
Theology
Yet
in
immanent
denied
Aristotle's
of
transcendence
the
to
was
Aristotle
their
beyond
Aristotle
What
"
Aristotle.
to
Ideas
only
his
called
Stoics.
the
were
denied
Stoics
and
Aristotle
Plato,
1.
and
active
not
know
know
of
The
io
"
conscious
with
"
Philosophyof Plotinos.
"
principle Reason
the universe, just as
"
or
the
Logos
"
connected
arably
insepsoul or
Reason
This cosmical
force,
"
human
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
In
"
"
"
this
we
may
"
trace
"
"
faint
resemblance
Aristotle's
to
psychology.
formation
of the world then took place by change of the
divine fire into air and water
water
separates into earth,
; which
and
fire. Earth and water
are
water
passive ; the finer air and
fire are active.
Finally at the end of a definite age, all things are
resolved into the divine fire (conflagrative)after which the world
will be once
things as before happening
more
created, the same
This of
without any thing new.
without variation into infinity,
course
destiny
brings into the finite sphericalworld absolute
".
and
"Pronoia
ever
howDestiny
Heimarmene,"
providence,"
that primary causes
so
mained
reonly related to auxiliary causes
seen
foreactions were
in our
free will and desire,whose
own
tality
but not predetermined by providence. As to the immordiffered.
of the soul, Stoic teachers
of
into
the domain
introduced
Ethics.
The
Stoics
The
3.
In
the
first
several
man
was
Ethics
new
place,
conceptions.
considered
only in relation to himself, not in relation to the
is not
To live according to nature
State of Plato or Aristotle.
one's
but
to
the
of
live
according
to
nature
others,
according to
the
Thus
himself.
im
maxneed only know
nature
own
; the sage
exhortation
becomes
to
an
reason
to live harmoniously with
In
the
second
in
absolute sense.
place,
live harmoniously,
an
ofncium ". This does
they introduced the conception of Duty,
not only regulate a natural impulse, as with Aristotle, but has the
it. It suppresses all "affective states,""Pathe."
to suppress
power
fear, trouble, desire and pleasure, as leading only to morbid
The
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"Apathy
pain and therefore worthless.
states, pleasure and
in conhuman
tradistinction
state
the
is consequently
highest
Apatheia
This
state
from pain.
to the Epicurean freedom
"
"
"
CHAPTER
IV.
EMANATIONISM.
The
1.
with
identity
aubon
been
the
of
of
Hermes
name
his
doctrines
Sokrates
have
must
thoroughly
have
been
his
an
the
That
Sakkas,
several
be
of
Relation
for
as
the
Justin
condemned
have
which
Hermes
also
become
Philo
Logos
at
was
to
so
time
him
were
of
lepios.
Ask-
for
ing
call-
whenever
misunderstood
rather
as
raise
heathen
authorities
Cyril
dria
Alexan-
of
the
even
God,"
second
the
support
to
were
and
; for
"
the
who
Ammon,
ground
who
(2)
only
in
well-known
nothing
or
him
Besides,
the
should
Homer,
be
Ammonius
tian
Chrisa
trine
doc-
Nicaea.
familiar
familiar
considered
and
lived
fragments
quote
be
from
Lactantius
Tertullian.
have
endeavouring
were
little
means
the
they
writings
of
an
good
however,
quotations
That
him
held
for
Plato
instance
or
fact
by
heathen.
(3) praised
If
opinions
own
writers,
among
purpose.
presumption
opposite
their
This
whose
must
in
could
must
refers
Hermes.
to
no
Fathers
theirs,
with
agrees
fit. their
is
He
over
of
living
There
"
have
thePoemandres,
Hermetic
Hermes
works.
and
who
mention
addressed
if these
The
Christian.
doctrine
his
to
Christianity.
in
logues
dia-
Tertullian.
grandson
are
of
disciple
to
Hermes
reputed
Sakkas,
of
writer
by
possible
fragments
Ammonius
times
the
2.
Asklepios,
the
his
Plato.
influence
had
writings
for
Besides,
of
that
his
introduced
Martyr,
one
the
that
so
thought
Josephus,
work.
and
D., is rendered
Hermetic
might
of
A.
him,
Josephus
Hermetic
241
of
works
of
time
the
he
Plato
of
at
assumed
because
one
with
Hermetic
extant
only
complete
136-216, A. D., mentions
between
and
identical
the
and
writings
Justin
God,
that
fame
and
to
first.and
have
as
of
of
verbally
passage
authority
the
Unity
the
the
or
just
Cas-
Hermetica
may
Hermes,
with
of
the
either
his
assume
fame.
of
who
Judaeus,
contemporary
of
end
speaker,
Trismeg-
to
Egyptian
the
at
Philo
early
Hermes
writer
of
gain
to
imbued
doctrine
contains
as
after
impossible
reasons,
those
Hermes
lived
is
century,
several
with
finally,
or,
been
to
second
agreed
He
living
for
which
of
the
suppose
the
introduced
It
in
Hermes
Alexandrian
an
time
uncertainty.
Menard
beginning
the
The
"
traditional
the
L.
and
have
in
is lost
lived
istus
Hermes.
of
Date
with
with
inspired.
writings
the
the
locutions
On
this
of
Philo,
of
the
ground,
he
must
Septuagint.
therefore,
if
Emanationism.
13
The
"
"
"
"
"
man,"
one
Philonism
again, especially in the expression
since the human
be a man
must
which refers to the Logos, who
-That
the
in
the
the
cannot
of
one
man
is
race
Logos.
image
ing
followbecause
of
from the
refer to the human
Jesus is plain
body
before the creexisted
ation
that
this
one
man
we
see
passage
of
the human
iginated
of the world, whereas
body
Jesus only orBut the Father of all
after it.
several thousand
years
Man
and
like unto
the
life
a
light,began
Mind,
being
things,
he
tiful,
beauhe
his
for
loved
child,
own
was
as
himself, whom
very
God
For The
loved his
having the image of the Father.
all
his
creations
delivered
and
this
over
own
(8)."
to
own
form,
?
the
Of the son
of
God
Of whom
sowing, O Father
(7)."
of all things (8) and the Tool of
Thus the Son is the Organism
God's Will (9).
asserted
It has also been
that the following words
constitute a
But The
reference to the Holy Spirit:
Mind, The God, being
masculine-feminine, originating life and light,begat by reason
another
of the Fire and
Mind-Creator, who
being God
Spirit
created
administrators
seven
(10)." This refers to the Logos,
shall see these seven
administrators
and as we
not
the seven
are
the
the
of
of
which
the
world
but
heavens
names
seven
Spirit
is composed.
It is therefore another
for the Logos, and
name
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
nothing more.
Immediately
Again,
"
the downborne
elements
springs
forth the Word
of The God, to the pure
creation of all Nature,
and
united to the creative Mind, for it was
consubstantial,
was
with
thus
it
We
that
what
above
(Homo-ousios)
see
(")."
of the Trinity is here
appeared to be referred to the third person
the
referred to what
would
be the second ; which is also called
Word
the
mo-ousios
"Howord
spiritual
"consubstantial,"
(12)." Besides,
used by any Christian writer of repute for
not
was
than a century after this,in the days of Athanasius.
sequently,
Conmore
Hermes
have
in the distincused this word
tively
cannot
theological meaning, whereas it agreed with his Philonism,
that all things were
in them.
in God, but not God
But besides showing negatively that Hermes
tian,
not a Chriswas'
show
this positively by noticing the fact that he
we
may
held to doctrines never
countenanced
by Christian authorities
The
t
here
is a metempsychosis
Deity is masculine-feminine
(13),
of souls,regeneration is accomplished by silence,and divination
is aporoved of (14).
from
"
"
"
The
14
Philosophy
of Plotinos.
"
"
"
^
"
"
"
way
seemed
to
such
countenance
animal
transmigration.
of the author
Conceptions. In the Emanationism
4. Hermetic
of the Hermetic
writings,the Universe is composed of a number
of spheres of being, each the image of the other next
above
it
The
(1B).
highest sphere of being is The God
(16),the next is
the Logos, the Son of God
(17),and beyond him, there are seven
successive spheres of Being of which
and
all things in heaven
earth are
there
nine spheres of being,
are
(18).Thus,
composed
each proceeding from the other, in the image of its begettor ;
Matter being the outermost
is considered
God
(19). When
apart
the world, the latter,including the Logos, is called the
from
"
Ogdoad
C20).
Psychology is analogical
into four parts (21)
But
:
"
to
the
The
cosmology.
soul
of
man
soul is divided
in
is carried on
this way.
in the reason,
in the
The Mind
Logos," the reason
Death
is
soul, the soul in the spirit,the spirit in the body."
the
the
of
the
from
only
retiring
spirit
physicalbody (22).
the
Hermetic
writer speaks of an
5. Cosmology. Although
besides God, he usually sums
all existence in three
Ogdoad
up
"
"
orders
of
the seven
ing
being, by comprehending
spheres proceedfind
under
Thus
the sofrom the Logos
the title Soul.
we
called Platonic trinity: The God, the World, and the Soul (23).
He
First The God, Second
the World, third the Man
;
says:
of the God
the
but
Man
the World
because
of
because
Man,
in ideas, but
in bodies, some
Of the entities some
indeed are
in
in
but
is
idea
and
but
some
ideas,
energies ;
body
energy
body (24)."
of
The
first principle,The
God, is the beginning and cause
all things (25); his name
is Logos, the God, the beautiful,the
is not in
there is nothing which
good (28). In the Universe
neither magnitude, nor
the God; whence
quality,nor
place, nor
and
Universe
is
the
about
the
God.
He
is
the
Universe
figure
is around
all things.
the God."
The second principle is
God," as contrasted with
God."
He
is the "first-begottenof God," and the "second
(").
the Logos
He is also called
(*)."
also be called
The third principleis Soul, which may
God,"
"
"
"
"
"
"
Emanationism.
though
second
The
in
lower
sense
than
15
in
that
which
it
applied is the
principle(29).
in respect
While
the First Principle is the Creator
Second
Principle is the Creator
Principle,the Second
"
to
the
proper
C2)."
The
physical world
is of
the body
course
of the World-Soul
C33)human
soul develops by the experiences it
The
(34)which are limited to
gathers in a series of reincarnations
of
bodies
human
by the guardianship of good spirits. "For
soul from this so great
is this law, to guard a human
The God
disgrace C36) of entering the body of an animal.
the Father
is the Logos, or
Second
Between
the Soul and
the
of
God's
the
will
(36).
mediating element,
Principle,
organ
This is the
tion
prize for souls (37)." And this is the administrathe nature
of the One
of the Universe, dependent from
and
Mind
One.
Than
it
the
of
the
which
pervading
through
nothing
unitive of men
is more
divine and energetic, or
more
to the
Daemon.
This is the Good
Blessed
Gods, of Gods to the men.
the soul which
is fullest of this ; unfortunate
the soul that is void
of this C38)."
Man
hate the body, in order to love himself, the Soul
must
is
Man
attracted to God
C").
by contemplation, as iron to the
C40).Thus, contrariwise,impiety brings its own
ment
punishmagnet
in darkness
and
fire '(41).The
only evil is ignorance of
the Deity C42). And
it is possible to discern him
through all
motely
things by natural knowledge, since everything is his image, re-
6. Ethics.
"
"
"
"
directly (43).
by which the soul reaches its development is the
silent prayer
of
silent contemplation, the
of the
regeneration
later mystics.
from
soul and
Accept rational sacrifices pure
heart intent upon
by
thee, O Unspeakable, Ineffable, Invoked
lies in silence (4B).
silence C44)." Thus
intellectual wisdom
Draw
it will come
and it becomes.
to thyself and
Lay
; wish
of the body and it will be the generation of the
to rest the senses
of the Matter
Deity. Purify thyself from the rational avengers
C46)."The road to be travelled by every soul passes through the
twelve signs of the Zodiac
indeed, but of all
(4T) of the nature
forms."
shaped
is to wrong
Besides silence,the way
to reach God
no
man
(48)
;
But the worship of God
is one
to be evil C48)."
: not
divine.
end
of life is to become
7. Spiritual Destiny. The
For
it is possible, O Child, that the soul be deified,placed in
the body of man,
having beheld the beauty of thy good (M)."
"Knowest
thou not that thou hast been born The God, and Son of
or
The
manner
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
16
the
One,
one
but
strife
and
after
the
this
piety
have
to
Transmigration
deification
the
human
body,
is
piety
to
becomes
not
divine;
have
such
striven
known
the
God,
the
(62)."
Mind
humanity
every
and
having
wholly
their
and
soul,
and
the
of
already,
can
to
(")""
must
continuity
hasten
the
those
is
nigh
Thus
the
to
to
One
they
attain
seest,
and
and
how
the
stars
Only
many
we
God
in
there,
deliver
The
must
(M)."
to
how
of
many
to
up
be
is
made
bodies
and
daemons,
accomplish,
they
This
God.
knowledge,
choirs
order,
themselves
become
Child,
such
which
by
means
And
they
who
of
courses
the
and
powers
through,
and
"
Father,
"Thou
Again,
pass
the
only
accomplished.
of
ending
good
divine
is
becoming
and
powers,
souls
of
be
upwards
mount
may
But
daemonhood
man)
no
Plotinos.
(53).
Deity
the
"
from
strife
(but
Gods
are
of
departure
wronged
men
the
kind
of
(51)"
I?
am
is
pious,
the
of
some
also
which
soul,
we
Philosophy
The
that
we
CHAPTER
TO
Sakkas.
Ammonius
1.
Ammonius
Theodoret,
Sakkas,
of
he
the
was
and
occupation
Christianity,
his
The
"
founder
of
son
of
TION
RELA-
Christian
himself
devoted
he
Neo-Platonism
According
labourer.
as
THEIR
CHRISTIANITY.
Alexandria.
became
and
AND
PLOTINOS,
SAKKAS,
AMMONIUS
V.
could
not
to
Porphyry
Soon
of
parents
however
to
philosophy.
of
approve
was
and
humble
he
cumstances
cir-
changed
He
doned
aban-
Christian
tility
hos-
in life, he
Later
speculations.
taught philosophy
with
teaching
orally, and
great
demanding
success,
a
from
his students
to
promise
keep his doctrines
secret.
Among
his students
the two
Herennius
and
Plotinos.
Origens,
were
We
of his doctrines
that he discovered
the agreement
only know
of
Aristotle
with
Plato, a remark
supported
by a statement
of his
doctrines
said that he felt himself
by his disciple Plotinos, who
bound
after the
heathen
by his promise
no
more
and
Origen
science
to
Herennius
and
body,
theirs.
"
always
of
place
and
birth
would
that
in
Lycopolis,
he
of his
greatness
Ezetoun,"
him, he never
broke
wisdom
that
East.
the
himself
forced
mutual
determined
of
in
campaign
is the
left his
Feeling
he
that
to
the
been
his
man
for
side
until
had
to
the
the
army
East
to
but
Persia
Gordian
when
of
the
time
now
to
bind
and
this
which
army
he
Ammonius
had
ties
with
said
India,
purpose
was
broke
first met
Sakkas
eleven
andria,
Alex-
to
learn
to
he
the
had
destined
up,
the
"Teuton
lasted
him
D.,
became
away
have
the
death
accomplish
of
to
he
a
on
A.
205
or
year
carried
so
which
other
no
go
To
in 204
is reported
me!"
From
intercourse,
he
was
day
birth-
having
it is supposed
Yet
born
his
of
twenty-eighth
and
he
about
ashamed
picture.
Sakkas
silent
almost
have
In
teacher
this
their
up
years.
"
remained
was
must
Egypt.
pupil of Ammonius
the
he
sit for
not
authority
good
in
broken
Plotinos
had
Plotinos.
2.
and
he
tached
atto
was
with
it to
where
he
settled
teacher
Rome,
as
a
consultations
and
holding
successfully managing
his school
till in his sixty-sixth year
he
died
(270 A. D.)
his
As
teacher
well
a
was
instructing
success
as
great,
poor
rich.
The
Gallienus
and
the
Emperor
as
Empress
Salonina,
his lectures.
This
due
others, attended
success
not
was
among
but
also to his personal
influence
and
only to his wisdom
power.
Above
of it to his genuineness
much
and
all, he owed
ity.
spiritualthe
that
time
lived with
he
him
During
Porphyry
enjoyed
four
the
times
which
he had
others
to
preached
ecstasy
as
being
the
attainment.
height of human
of
to
return
philosophy,
i8
The
Philosophy of Plotinos.
According
ful
of Plotinos is so beauti3, Relation to Christianity.The system
and
that Christian
been
coherent
writers have
slow
so
not
all
that
in
the
is good
it to
to ascribe
early Christian training of
"
be underSakkas. How
stood
Ammonius
littlesuch a claim means
can
of Alexandria
accused
when
recollect that Clement
we
Homer
and
Plato of stealing their best thoughts from the Jewish
prophets. Consequently such an explanation of the good
elements
if it
merit any
of Neo-Platonism
would
not
answer
that
such
still
made
claim (which is
not
were
a
to-day) the
by
value of nonChristian
philosophy is seriously impaired, and
it deserves.
than
Christianity is credited with more
In the first place, Ammonius
child when
Sakkas
mere
was
a
he became
able to
as
Christian, and left Christianity as soon
think for himself.
Besides, Eusebius
(2)distinctlystates that he
left Christianity on
of its hostilityto science and
osophy,
philaccount
that
the very
subject of dispute ; and it is well known
beliefs.
the bitterest enemies
of their former
become
converts
would
Would
it be likely that Amirpnius Sakkas
permit himself
of
to be influenced
by Christianity in the very thing on account
he left it?
which
Not a single word
or
similarityof expression in the Enneads
betrays any acquaintance with the Christian formulations, nor
does
Plotinos anywhere betray that his doctrines had arisen in
opposition to or imitation of Christianity ; he utterly ignores it.
longed
And
the reason
of this is plain ; for the Christians usually beand
to the lowest
most
unphilosophic classes, with a
it
almost
few exceptions ; and
seems
amusing to think that a
man
so
deeply read in philosophy as Plotinos or Ammonius
ently
Sakkas
all their best doctrines from eminshould borrow
were
unphilosophic sources.
Christian
examine
the state of contemporary
Further, if we
reotyped
stewithout
that
almost
a
will
it
is
exception
see
philosophy we
Testament.
form
of Philonism
adapted to the New
There
are
no
original conceptions, and no learning ; Clement's
at
Greek
literature being mostly made
quotations from
up
this
then
could
second
hand from cheap anthologies (8). How
rich results of Neobarren
furnish the acknowledged
source
Platonism?
20
earlier
Greek
good,
The
Philosophyof Plotinos.
philosophy.
notice
that
this statement
whether
think so or not, it
we
that Plotinos either thought so, or affected to think
in every
work
of his now
extant.
Plotinos relies upon
the authority of Plato in every
small detail
the philosopher," or
(*). He refers to him as
with
even
must
we
is certain
so
"
"
a
as
we
he
"
he says
without
(5); or even
sign of quotation
any
in the famous
the
paragraph on
transmigration of souls which
shall see
later ("). If his opinion clashes with that of Plato,
mere
will
resort
what
to
Plato
from
to
us
seems
misinterpretation
in order
(7). He considers
that he is reestablishing
Platonism, and desires to be called a Platonist;
pure
if the issue is raised,he will refuse to depart from
Plato's norm.
Other
often referred to merely
philosophers are
the
as
ancients
the
and
ancient
or
blessed philosophers
Hoi
archaioi
Hoi archaioi kai makarioi
or
philosophoi (8)." He
believes that his teaching concerning the Good, the Mind, and
the Soul is Platonic
(9); but he finds it also in Parmenides,
to
save
censure
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
and
Herakleitos, Anaxagoras
is said
Empedokles
; Anaxagoras
be he who
attained
He
believes (10)
through age
accuracy.
of the ancients
that some
have
the truth ; the only
must
known
of them
it most,
which
knew
question remains
quently,
fully. Consehe feels at liberty to criticise them, as he does
okles
Empedand
Anaxagoras
(n).
Worthy of notice is the fact that he claims that the very marrow
to
of his system
that of Sokrates
is the same
and
Plato :
as
know
Gnothi
Seauton."
He
Let us obey
thyself
says :
the command
of the Deity, and learn to know
ourselves
(u)."
This fact might be used to prove
that there existed such a thing
in which
the moral
esoteric Platonic
element
doctrine
as
an
the prevailing one
and which
handed
under
oath
down
was
was
the
Fathers
of secrecy.
of
Church
look
this
maxim
Many
upon
sufficient guide to salvation and it is remarkable
how
it meets
as
of being Platonic.
At any
us
name
everywhere under the same
tics,
rate it is certain that the problems of Cosmology,
Physics, Polimain
and
the
were
Sociology which
topics of exoteric
Greek
as
philosophy, are to Plotinos
important only inasmuch
of
the
deductions
from
his
the
welfare
of
soul.
doctrine
they are
"
"
"
"
Aristotle
is indebted
Plotinos
Greek Philosophy. To
tion
partiallyfor his conception of development and emanaand
for
his
the
of
transcendence
lines
outfor
psychology,
God,
;
of
or
suggestions
cosmology.
of
his Nous
To
(with the Platonic name
Plato, Plotinos owes
most
God) his conception of the Earth-Soul, his categories, and alall his details,as well as the transmigration and
destiny of
souls.
moral
for his exclusive
is indebted
the Stoics Plotinos
To
the
of
of
his
and
touches
conception
some
interest,
possibly
in
of
the
uncertain
indeed,
spite
Earth-Soul, though this is very
5. Relation
opinion
To
to
"
of Erdmann.
the Emanationist
doctrines
of writers such
as
the
inditer
of
Relation
the
"
Plotlnos
Hermetica,"
and
completed
which
Plotinos
Thus
we
philosophy
he
is
not
last
that
and
which
most
of
before
of
Greek
the
proportions.
various
To
Thus,
we
philosophy
may
source,
haps,
per-
former
to
owes
his
claim
that
osopher
phil-
high-souled
whatever
of
was
look
of
upon
Greece
value
is
Neo-Platonism
as
the
spirituality.
admit
but
system
one
time.
this
Plotinos
to
of
stages
burning
originality,
into
his
system
scruple
not
philosophy,
represents
perfect
his
bold
combined
philosophy
phase
we
need
and
Emanation,
of
conception
development.
of
much
and
inventor
an
who
in
how
see
21
the
mysticism,
his
owes
his
owes
of
Christianity.
inter-connected
conception
Aristotelian
to
his
in
system
its
noblest
the
as
CHAPTER
MIKROKOSM
interesting
in
not
To
some
this
subjects
the
it be
Let
indirectly,
worth
to
therefore
us
to
know
Ennead
last
that
two
refer
cessories
ac-
us
first and
these
are
efficient
commands
between
object
no
are
soul
topic
or
other
would
who
Ennead
directly
manner,
the
is
they
what
about
no
All
that
measure
Concerning
is
there
Soul.
the
the
the
there
and
devoted,
are
Plotinos
Deity
absorbing
of
()."
ourselves
To
"
than
rather
command
the
obey
"
end.
think,
MAKROKOSM.
except
in
him
to
this
to
and
speak
Life.
consideration
of
worthy
only
AND
Contemplative
The
1.
VI.
to
does
subject
the
again.
In
order
therefore
true
aspect,
very
summarily,
the
nature
of
of
views
shall
we
those
from
both
places
life
practical
in
shadow
Yet
must
we
is not
the
attain.
of
reach
matters
discussion
time
of
partiality
this
as
fact
the
"
theoretic
life
the
life, and
have
of
system
Plotinos
far
above
the
his
above
was
life is only
practical
the
lative
specu-
may
that
as
Olumpos
in
the
philosophers,
Plotinos
from
of
his
to
professional
Plotinos
the
of
is
the
aim
life in
the
ian
Hegel-
latter
limited
terms
their
all, whatever
those
to
which
such
Besides,
who
"
"
contemplative
of the philosopher
of philosophy,
this
abstractions,
metaphysical
the
other
exposition
an
their
of
Hercules
demands
with
acquaintance
to
take
not
which
sense,
of
of
of
"
theoretic
the
hand
being
or
For
its
in
(3).
former
the
(2).
Hades
attain
to
means
in
system
also
"
real
the
as
Plotinos
the
to
space
most
that
and
all
reason
the
philosophy
contemplative
"
the
with
deal
our
taken
fact
upon
of
Soul.
devoted
the
philosophy
to
of
the
The
looked
they have
speculative
all
have
have
considerations.
arisen
forced
be
who
Plotinos
the
present
reserving
destiny of
and
Most
"
to
have
and
contemplative
moral
private
lived
all vices
life
than
more
habit
would
logician
no
a
nothing
think
to
have
is
ficulty
dif-
within
and
life
has
out
of themselves.
been,
is exclusively
life of Plotinos
contemplative
it
is something
life
of the
moral
based
perfection
a
proves
upon
life is
The
contemplative
than
skill in logomachy.
more
mere
of
face
to
in
attains
that
God,
the
which
soul
to
knowledge
one
The
fact
face, rapt
Such
2.
that
the
in
ecstasy.
Mikrokosm.
originator
life is it that
contemplative
in
"
We
have
philosophy
seen
of
the
Plotinos
that
before
word
"
seeks.
Aristotle
mikrokosm."
was
His
the
con-
Mikrokosm
ception
that
was
is
is
man
enlarged.
man
and Makrokosm.
universe
The
will
constitution of one
of these terms, we
in order
be able to reason
of the other. Thus
to the constitution
ourselves :
will only have to know
know
the Universe, we
to
God.
If man
and
seek our
and if we
highest self,we will know
be separate, how
God
shall man
ever
hope for an at-one-ment
with God
?
is not
Plotinos
inclined to use
mikrokosm
though
althe word
be
he has the full Aristotelian conception of it. It may
in
his
that
him
it
into
with
not
we
are
reading
proved
crediting
that of Aristotle ; for his Aristotelian
psychology, and
system
his continual ascription of psychologicalterms
to the World-Soul
that
if
know
we
the
"
"
that
assure
us
"
"
"
"
"
The
the
first four of these psychological elements
compose
Psuche
the
soul ; the later three
the
or
body,
compose
"Eidolon
Psuches
or
image of the body (n). The body is
furnished to us, as we
shall see, by the World-Soul, called the
lunar
gods (12)." The Soul is alone ourselves ; it is created
It is divided into two
by God.
parts : the ideal, and rational
soul" (18). The
rational soul is composed
of reason
vidual
and indimind
which
faculties are
realized in almost
soul
;
every
the ideal soul consists of the two
highest faculties that are in
souls latent,or undeveloped.
many
The -facultyof reason
constitutes the individuality
of the Soul,
for it has the power
of identifying itself with the highest faculties
of sinking into the lower.
When
the soul does sink into
or
the flesh,the higher faculties quiesce, become
latent,and may
in extreme
Of
the
latent
faculties may
cases
atrophy.
at
course,
later date be revivified (14).
some
While
the soul is incarnate, all the seven
indisfaculties are
and
the
bond
is
olubly bound
broken
together ;
only at death,
when
the soul abandons
the body as an
old dress.
"
"
"
"
The
24
In
this scheme
of the Soul
the
We
become
become
must
of psychology
are
of Plotinos.
assured
both
the immanence
in thei
is
of the Soul[
"
in every
part of the body, as the body
the transcendence
of the higher faculties
Soul," and
above
Philosophy
body (15).
remember
it
"
"
the
"
ideal
lives in the
"
soul
we
external
saw
(2e);
above
world,
the
"
and
rational
the
"
external
self that
(")"
How
the
incarnation
into the
furnished
body
by
Earth-
the
takes
and
becomes
even
forms
4.
united
to
the
earthly spiritualbody,
or
perhaps
it.
In
order
to
show
forth
universe
the large one,
must
we
to
the relation of the small
while bound
by an
premise that each separate faculty of man,
exists in a universe of its own.
indissoluble tie to the other faculties,
The
table
physical body dwells in a realm of dead matter
; the vegesoul in a realm of organiq life in which organic life is pos-
Mikrokosm
and
sible,
universal
The
of
nature
miniature.
is
other
the
including
being,
have
image,
transcends
all
individual
mind
is
body
is
image
the
form
or
beyond
which
not.
in
of
each
Realm
God
as
his
the
all
the
lower
of
the
vegetable
life
the
call
may
of
;
in
life
this
is
absolute
Mind
realms
is
again
the
the
finally,
pro-
the
turn,
again
the
is
the
of
image
of
grade
darkness
its
being
God
their
this
;
lowest
is
which
image
Divine
the
matter
of
Realms
sake
of
separately,
shown
of
is
said
universes
These
in
or
third,
be
cannot
World,
the
God,
Mind
Mind,
The
which
in
us
thinkable
all
Divine
the
prope~.
and
and
we
mind
these
the
their
of
being
nought,
exist.
even
the
as
in
before
is above
is
soul,
Soul
sensual
Thus
abstraction
that
does
for
the
mind.
is
While
forced,
or
of
much
Tait,
existence.
possesses
image
image
who
of
Divine
through
form
individual
the
(31).
universal
lies
essence,
Realm
God
The
rate
sepa-
become
to
and
Realm
The
in
else.
similarly
ceedng
it
other.
the
other
existence
God
The
and
the
although
immanent
are
is
Second
four,
each
interpenetrate
of
being
Divine
the
to
Stewart
process
the
;
in
order
Universe."
Realm
First
which
Nous,
whole
in
each
Messrs.
Unseen
The
being
and
so
interpenetrate
of
the
The
perfection
of
"
book,
co-exist
that
ourselves
open
universes
interesting
the
only
25
powers
fitted
are
Realms
different
the
they
need
we
different
These
to
which
for
realms
human
all
Thus
on.
so
Makrokosm.
and
forth
Plotinos
is
in
in
then
his
immanence
inseparably
clearness
and
the
image,
to
and
conjoined,
exposition,
consider
man.
to
the
we
cendence
trans-
will
consider
transcendence
be
first
CHAPTER
FIRST
THE
1.
The
and
One
it is necessary
reflection
and
these
will
they
from
the
If
Many.
In
"
order
to
the
mind
ideas
and
representations.
the
understand
receive
should
anything,
sensation
through
The
more
understood
thoroughly
more
GOD.
are
fined
sharply dethey ; and
tinct
by and dis-
limited
degree that they are
ideas
and
Ratiocination
representations.
which
is subsumed
implies a Manifold,
mind.
is therefore
apprehending
Unity
clear
in
other
necessarily
of the
Unity
fundamental
THE
REALM,
that
are,
be
the
VII.
than
the
fore
thereunder
more
Manifoldness.
considerations
Divine
the
to
apply these
Being,
the
thought
necessarily implies a Manifold,
of being
and
and
activity (*). As a
duality of thinker
thought,
the
Divine
of
called
Divine
this,
activity
Thought
consequence
the
realms
be
the
of
Divine
Life.
Above
cannot
highest plane
of
of
Divine
realm
of the
Divine
be
the
Unity
thought
must
above
God
is then
which
all thought.
is above
Apperception,
all
all describable
all Divine
above
above
Thought,
thought,
all Divine
Divine
Life, above
(2).
Being
foldness
ManiThe
be
Manifoldness
cannot
highest
; for
; it is Unity
of Unity
is after all only a Manifoldness
(3), and everything
is thus
above
is One
is itself only because
it thus
(4). God
and
above
and
Divine
all
Divine
Goodness,
Unity
(5),
even
then
the
is
God
Goodness,
that
Divine
Being
(6). If we
say
and
has
its
of
this
Divine
Goodness
object
subject
thought
; it
And
becomes
of the
quality of goodness.
good
by partaking
this quality,
this
if it thus
needs
depends
on
quality, if it thus
we
should
we
that
see
then
Divine
it cannot
same
be
be
may
said
Therefore
and
Being.
Unity
must
(7),
original
being
compound
be
must
independent
being : cause
Divine
the
of
The
Goodness.
self-existent
and
independent
the
precede
simple must
of derivative
independent
is above
all categories
of effect, and
(8). God
Unity, of Manifoldness
then
The
is
God
and
of Life, Being,
Activity.
Thought
In
and
Over-activity.
Over-thought,
Over-life,
Over-being,
could
who
left behind
this last point Aristotle
by Plotinos,
was
the
be
not
on
logical
purus,"
pure
God
all
at
God
causes.
2.
He
The
God
is above
(10).
grounds
energy
we
only
is thus
Above
his
see
God
know
even
to
way
is above
this.
even
by
seeking
above
the
Prime
first
"
God
call
cause
Mover
even
That
there
of
all
actus
is
other
of Aristotle^
unknowable.
is therefore
Cognisability. God
ite
infinand
is
he
incomprehensible
(9),
all description
"
The
28
Philosophyof Plotinos.
"
(38).
him
of Begetting. Love
6. Manner
is
; but the question remains,
"
love
sufficient reason
getting
for all bedoes this disinterested
How
beget?
This
is
the
been
wisest have never
able to explain
of illustrations drawn
from the natural world.
except by the use
Plotinos
likens God
is so full that it overflows
to a river which
its banks
and
the
has
does
the same,
which
overflowed
water
;
question
itself
extending
in
wider
circuits
(39). This
figure must
with caution ; for it should not indicate either
a temporal becoming
(4"),since creation always takes place from
the inner or causal side (41); nor
should it be understood
to be
however
be
such
as
would
abstract
latter remains
unmoved
and
of being flows from him
(42).
stream
which
That
proceeds
from
him
in it as if contained
by it
illustration of the sun
not
of the first
undiminished, while the
from
; the
cause
is
taken
emanation
an
ever
ever
the
remains
(43).Plotinos
and
honoured
the ray
power
in him
; but
he
the timeadvances
of light that proceeds
it without
loss be not
Unless
therefore we
apparent.
of explaining the continued
self-existence
is doubtless the
ot God, in spite of his eternal
begetting, which
of
be
whole
said
the
Plotinos
to be yet unmust
proved.
theory
case,
suffer alone ; the
would
not
Nevertheless, Plotinos
that
enormous
find
some
other
the
means
philosophy
of
7. Relation' of Cause
Christianitywould
and
World.
"
The
its
The
God.
29
decreasing simultaneously
fulfilsits
a Unity, and
Ideas
Mind
its
function and
impresses
with a seal,so that things are living expressions of
in matter
as
of
never
Idea (5T). That which is begotten is of course
a divine
each
getting
bewhich
that
it
with
at
of
begot
being
equal intensity
;
off into the
of an
image the light of perfection dims
darkness
of non-existence, Manifoldness
increasing, and Unity
disappearing.
In matter, things are
separated by space ; but in the Divine
the soul is
(ss). Thus
Mind, they are only separated by form
of the body ; therefore we
wholly in every single member
may
is
also God
correctly the body is in the soul (5"). Thus
say
for
and
all
of
the
the
world,
world,
wholly in every single part
of the divine is always, for
that is,is in him
(**).The presence
of the intermediate
lower beings, mediated
through the presence
of
in
the
there are
Thus
World
physical
Being.
stages
where
everythree
stages of being : God, the Nous, and the Earthand
so
on
Perfection
is itselfinasmuch
as
Divine
The
(6"i).
nature
it is
Soul.
If the centre
of the Universe
be God, then the
is that of Nous,
enlightened by God : the Second
First
Sphere
is that
soul,
CHAPTER
SECOND
THE
God.
REALM,
the
Saturn,
1.
The
VIII.
Cognisable
GOD,
Deity.
second,Plotinos
COSMIC
The
"
calls
MIND.
first
Realm
called
was
Saturn,
for
shortness
Realm,
that
ratiocination
of
pellation
ap-
0).
We
iji speaking
saw,
besides
apperception,
intension
the
and
then
of
just
the
as
Divine
is primary
said
that
things
The
of
for
the
it and
(1Z) but
what
is below
Nous
there
are
matter
any
human
it,
on
is
system
this
four
;
Thought.
And
being.
Thoughts
that
account
as
the
of
if matter
at
is
only
all, they
an
must
Mind
in
(8),
no
no
ory
mem-
cannot
still
behold
cribe
des-
can
the
actual
behoM
it cannot
(14).
Over-being
and
Being
Divine
These
Categories.
only
it may
actuality
thinking
was
Plotinos
Divine
and
thought
God
"
is
exist.
the
but
never
can
Mind
ratiocination
(13). Moreover,
ness,
good-
it comprehends
(10) and
apperception,
itself is wholly
full
Categories
of
being,
eternity
(5),
to
future
Nous
him
and'
Stoical
but
of
the
so
of
potentiality
powers
Over-
Divine
shall
is that
templates
con-
image,
tion,
appercep-
Mind
that
or
unknown
Unity
Being
of
the
and
As
it, because
Divine
(18). It is
no
As
not-thinking
from
(9),
describe
can
exist,
determination
between
actual
grasp
Identity
identical,
(n).
past
the
God
this
progress
thinking
contemplate
of
no
that
existed,
of
no
inconcluded
the
have
is
; the
(6). Thus
time
the
tiful;
Over-beau-
was
Mind
Divine
the
(3).
Over-being,
(4).
self
of
Unity
It
of
unity
is
Divine
its
in
not
distinction
(7),
thought
in
eternity,
consequence
knows
2.
in
it is
God
; the
but
Mind
God
Divine
object
which
itself.
tion
ratiocinathe
think?
hind
be-
applied
of
and
higher
lies
when
unity,
is Over-activity
complete
intelligible action
live
to
the
than
Over-thought
God
of
that
is beautiful.
thought.
the
Divine
of
more
activity
of
intensity
be
thinks
Mind
Over-life,
life, and
of
of
strict
of
logical
same
was
subject
plies
im-
Unity
which
universe,
more
thinks
reason
is conscious
the
good,
thus
human
which
all
and
the
thought,
the
of
Unity
and
to
does
the
Unity
ratiocination,
no
and
under
apperception,
applied
thoughts
iself,
by
of
Manifold
therefore
(2), thinker
kind
subsumed
limited
This
is
It
Manifold
What
be
becomes,
Nous.
Mind,
First
Unity
of
Unity
God.
universe,
itself
with
This
Manifold
the
shall
being
itself.
as
the
to
which
Manifold,
of
Thought
Mind
are
the
refutes
treated
and
of
ten
the
are
reality
totelian
Aris-
ities
qual-
if
mind,
image
of Mind,
be Categories
of
then
Second
The
of
ideas
"
to
Ideas
as
has
God
one
it
all
forms
and
of
of
in
perfect
any
are
is
all
all
It
things,
thing
and
as
one
C22).
this
is
beauty
as
it.
inasmuch
it
were
proceeds
telligible
in-
true
Mind
thus
all
power
Even
in
(2B)
is
propositions
and
life
represented
which
(19)
things
is
Divine
the
to
cludes
in-
Mind
it
The
is
possesses
things
blessedness
all
motion.
(").
contains
It
Divine
that
so
geometry
of
(a).
(24)
world
beauty
in
presence
thinks
Gods
lower
this
of
(20).
powers
of
the
it
archetypes
human
peace
for
all
original
the
(18)
in
contained
science
31
The
numbers,
Noetos"
Kosmos
the
Mind.
(").
Being
all
and
things
all
World,
its
and
Thought
with
beginning
Cosmic
Realm,
small
The
versal
unias
powers,
itself
in
its
and
has
(*)
things
and
harmony
as
the
from
it
accounts
of
trace
the
its
ness
still-
CHAPTER
THIRD
THE
The
i.
Trinity
from
It is very
it in
Trinity
in
original,
the
lower
speculations
the
three
The
"
form
much
so-
altered
Plotinos.
be
to
of
Zeus-Rhea.
in
of
seems
speaks
SOUL.
and
found,
be
Plotinos
He
THE
Saturn
may
the
that
true
places.
some
REALM
Over-God,
Platonic
called
IX..
little
uncertain
successive
about
of
states
being,
O."
and
"Gods,
daemons,
men
he
if there
four
orders
the
the
Again,
Good,
speaks
as
were
:
the
and
which
the
human
souls
Nous,
World-Soul,
daemons,
are
he
of
of
souls
and
(*)" Again,
speaks
spheres
spheres,
stars,
and
the
below
the
to
corresponding
divine,
human,
moon,
space
one
than
bestial
and
Yet,
order
of
Of
rule, he
"
the
third
begetting
being
unargumentative
of
one
The
the
souls
the
world
is
but
simply
Soul
is therefore
of
it
In
begins
Thus
the
she
stifled
through
Mind
to
matter
It
process
will
of
and
light of
light
of
the
case
is this
much
second
is
God.
which
that
its
there
in
"
to
herself, and
Nous,
her
may
which
body
therefore
body
as
understand
its
time
or
space
it
beneath
nothing
of
passions
to
light; and
yond
be-
in
begins
the
space.
time."
Manifoldness
and
to
neither
forth
(10) ;
the
agonies
is
the
bring
of
spheres
is the
sphere
(8).
darkness
and
into
down
or
inner
So
the
imaged,
the
called
be
may
impassible
the
bound
not
(9)
is said
sink
may
in
which
Mind,
time
is
(e).
further
adorned
and
lights, being
lightened
enmany
souls
do
who
when
not
thinking
(7)
speak
when
incarnated
of the
(14). The
not
sphere
illimitable
Soul
Soul
The
but
fire, and
of
therefore
surround
being,
of this
Idea
an
of
have
to
those
Divine
the
of
is
ordinated
sub-
Christian
plane
reason
begins
Soul
is
many
glow,
outermost
is full
individually
said
by
(5).
Soul
the
begetting
the
to
The
of light which
heaven
partake
led
that
same
first
the
the
second,
(*).
like
wise
of
three-fold
hierarchically
are
no
image
of the
love
in
Soul
the
they
and
the
was
enunciating
and
that
other,
image
the
circles
highest
all
the
second
the
Nous,
the
understood
to
one
As
is the
is
in
hesitate
not
God,
it
course
the
so
does
existence
Trinity.
"
(s).
men
as
other,
to
of
individual
Yet
flesh.
intellection
she
the
through
(u) and
body
the
Divine
is
reason
her
harm
can
the
as
be
she
reasons
mon
Comform
is
(12).
the
explain
of begetting
of the
soul
if
position
is always
proceeding
a
we
remark
into
that
Manifoldness
the
The
from
we
Third
Soul
Realm, The
33
others,
so
all others
that
other
"
are
"
to
it(13).Beneath
the
Manifold
croaches
enSense, Vitality and Matter,
the Unity, until in matter, Unity
more
on
is in its last degree of degradation into Manifoldness.
All souls were
originally equal ; they
2. Co-equalityof Souls.
all originalthe highest heaven
from
ly
all came
(15). They were
alike
that
and
Divine
Mind
are
the
of
they
(16),
same
parts
fact
the
that
from
is
derstand
unand
can
nature
they
to idea
proved
as
be at the
another, and in the intelligibleworld
one
time, that is,that they can communicate
same
place at the same
in
Soul,
the
Reason,
more
and
"
(") with
each
other.
of origin, there is no
possible
spite of this community
confusion
that there appears
to reign much
doubt
injusticeand
it. Yet,
dissimilarityin the dispensationof the world as we know
down
there
below
of disorder,
in spite of this appearance
reigns
order
world
obtains in the intelligible
here just as absolute
as
and differ only
Nous
from the same
Souls come
above (w). The
cause
differ bein essential qualitiesor characteristics (10). Souls may
of these original characteristic differences (20)then by the
in former
incarnations
of experience gotten
amount
(21) the
of
air (22),
bodies given them differed,
being celestial,
ethereal,or
have
differed (23); but
their education
or
discipline may
or
the
this
inexorable
thread of Justice,
all
runs
inequality
through
is
out
which
metes
happiness according to goodness, which
The
is it that
merit.
good alone are happy ; on this account
and
difference between
the Gods
men
are
happy (23)." The
in
human
is
of
incarnated
Gods
are
development ; men
only one
bodies, the Gods have spheres or worlds as bodies,and are called
sisterGods
in respect to man
because
they give to their
souls
also
divine
the opportunity of incarnating. Men
are
brothers
of the souls
sisters
and
beings (24)and are the
that human
of the Gods
(25). Besides, Plotinos states explicitly
and
the
will
hold
souls will have the same
same
dignity
powers
into themselves
the World-Soul, especially if they will turn
as
without
C26).
spot
0
15 ff
in
Yet
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
World-Soul."
We
treat
of the World-Soul.
must
now
3. The
the Stoics as some
Plotinos took his conception of it,not from
Plato.
authorities have thought, but from
The latter seems
to
the souls of men
have
been uncertain whether
proceeded from
the World-^oul,whether
they had all been created by God, in the
but
smaller
.in size. Plotinos solves the difficulty
same
)
mould,
born of the World-Soul
in
were
by saying that the souls of man
respect to their bodies ; but that their impassible self,the rea- '""'
and
mind
had been created
son
or
begotten by the same
Nous,
the World-Soul
her
sister-souls opportunities for^
only offering
above
development. We would thus explain the fact that we saw
The
34
Philosophyof Plotinos.
three presences,
God, the
everywhere on earth there were
souls
and
the
the
and
that
human
and
World-Soul,
Nous,
yet
and
for
short C27),
brethren,
were
World-Soul, also called Jupiter
equal as to origin.
Plato never
defined accurately whether
his World-Soul
was
the
earth.
the Soul of the whole
of
physical universe, or only
The
when
Stoics distinctlylooked
to the Soul of the Universe
gotten.
bespeaking of a World-Soul, from which all other souls were
Plotinos was
the first philosopher to limit this WorldSoul to the earth, assuming that each star soul possessed its own
soul.
He says :
One
sphere, and
single life inheres in the one
each
in
all
is
located
Thus
creatures
one
living being.
sphere
which are on the sphere return
to the same
one
life,and thus all
souls on one
(28)."
sphere are to a certain extent one
We
must
now
more
enquire
particularlyconcerning the nature
of this World-Soul.
rise to the
The
we
by which
argument
certainty of its existence is the Stoical one : just as in pur body
is a soul, which keeps the body together, so every
physical body
is kept together by a soul in which
the body is (29). For
bodies
in the souls, which
are
(30). The form of its body
pervade them
is spherical,because
it is perfect; for when
unincarnate, the form
of the spiritualbodies of human
souls are
also spherical (81).
In the Third
dividual
Over-Soul.
Realm, that of in4. The Transcendent
souls and the World-Soul
mind, as we have seen, human
different as to individuality,and
are
coequal as to origin (82).
of the World-Soul
are
so
Nevertheless, the intellectual powers
much
lect
intelthat she is called
more
developed than ours
pure
of sense
but by
C33),"knowing things not through organs
direct intuition (84).She is outside of the world-body, and bears
all that is bodily within herself (35). Her
self-consciousness
(**)
that
"
"
"
is
so
memory
much
needs any
that she neither has nor
higher than ours
all
Since
she has
(8T).
knowledge present to her mind,
"
CHAPTER
THE
Mind.
is the
Realm
this
faculty
lower
double
when
the
discursive
and
"
ideal
and
Logikon,"
In
this
then
This
It
Dianoia."
it may
but
only
in
the
O,
of
other
of
the
of
the
neither
same
the
reason
case
the
soul
(4).
matter)
"
"
Logos
reason,
in
incarnating
ever
the
called
the
Gods,
of
possibility
Earth,
They,
like
as
called
soul
its individuality,
lose
to
as
also
impassible
Nous
similar
be
Zeus,
their
to
the
are
Zeus,
memory
Earth-Soul
like
nor
lacks
visible
the
as
Zeus,
the
they
ly,
quiet-
and
seen
the
Earth-Soul,
they
have
we
(u).
souls
Gods,
live
ratiocinative
them
"Gods"
Earth-Soul,
(9)
the
is
Zeus
of
perfect
most
far
from
producing
souls
the
body,
Like
steadily
(10). Again,
called
World-Soul
must
(8).
Gods
nor
eternal
flesh
the
is
and
one,
the
the
there
harmoniously,
reason,
ty.
facul-
separate
as
were,
individual
atrophy.
As
are,
of
in
buried
cosmic
spheres
his
World-Souls,
it
as
destiny.
his
for
exist
human
part
useless
invisible
the
peacefully,
have
so
stars.
the
contemplate
music
lowest
consequently
and
image
is the
World-Souls."
Soul
the
may
with
rational
with
to
of
that,
essentially
becoming
Other
2.
as
(6).
the
become
and
its
reason
ceases
the
good
so
is
we
and
responsible
his
reason
in
happens
realm
This
the
disappeared
falling has
is
man
identifies
that
become
have
who
of
possibility
reason
man
it is plain
Nous,
"
of
realm
however,
When,
the
it
changed,
Nous)
rational
"
Mind
(5).
animals
of
body
the
reason
"
called
upon
Therefore,
contrasted
vitality
(2).
lower
doubly
as
or
tween
be-
looked
Consequently
soul,
(sense
is
and
be
individual
(individual
soul
preclude
to
mind
"
the
appear
"
higher
choosing
may
(3).
rational
parts
human
with
reason
irrational
the
Besides,
itself
soul,
his
imagination.
imagination
every
three
soul,"
(reason)
and
and
soul
individual
as
higher
Realm
the
Third
the
the
with
the
Third
of
a
it is
represented
intellect
"
in
distinguish
is
"
makes
to
himself
daemons
permanent
what
in
lacking
Mind
conjoined
the
identifies
intellect
that
occurs
containing
reason
of
soul
of
is
reason
individual
identify
its two
Mind"
of
"
reason
the
loves,
''individual
as
Realm
the
may
Thus
its two
The
of
man
powers.
REASON.
characteristic
faculty
which
by
This
"
essential
lower
REALM,
Although
C).
World-Soul
yet
FOURTH
Individual
1.
X.
powers,
for
XL
CHAPTER
of
Senses
of
the
lacking
in
the
The
1.
fashion
Plotinos
makes
(').
It might
in
begotten
the
system
that
this
Since
of
and
the
sense
beget
2.
image
of
that
human
sense
Earth-Soul
in
this
on
Human
3.
is
its
this.
the
body
fact
life
than
which
has
of
and
It
that
is
here
is
body
so
The
itself, the
soul
at
physical
life
the
earthly
the
suppose
first
time
the
kind
education
for
incarnate
by
soul
(*).
her
Plotinos
which
higher
lower
Plotinos
would
to
the
with
with
recedes
the
withdrawal
and
the
explained
of
form;
body
nature
the
former.
and
but
lasts
ruptible.
cor-
soul
dle.
can-
spiritual
We
appearance
\
1
\
passible,
im-
departure
lighted
celestial
the
the
rational
of
body
order
in
by
are
our
much
spiritual
the
spiritual
both
to
is
to
identical
are
body
have
This
belongs
part
earthy
though
association
follows
spiritual
image.
an
it
Yet,
the
belongs
The
spiritual
light
we
perfect
furnishes
(3).
meet
They
body,
Sense
between
the
earthly
separation
takes
all vitality has
left
place when
that
of
realm
the
matter
passions
The
bodies
able
be
this
for
that
every
of
Realm
sensations
The
as
and
in
is
are
vitality, and
This
"
separable
Soul,
vents
prereason
separately.
remembered
to
the
order,
opportunities
souls
existed
nothing
Nous
It
"
ing
dur-
Mind
have
continually.
death.
the
existing
be
development.
must
perfect
Earth-Souls
sense,
Earth-Soul.
than
it
in
rule
reflection,
on
of
to
he
should
Besides,
Realm.
will
seen
individual
furnishing
of the
given
the
it
two-fold.
again
eternal
are
the
of
physical
dispensation
they
longer
and
Sense-Realm.
psychical
more
Fifth
body,
her
faculties
lowest
plain
in
lacking
individual
the
subsist
sister
be
that
the
the
for
her
affords
incarnating
insists
souls
need
is the
as
factor
into
when
as
animals
no
one
one,
career.
into
still
in
united
organically
three
as
Souls
Unity
it is
well
of
has
are
lower
each
great
merged
may
realms
these
however
the
merged
man
their
will
Earth-Soul's
the
though
that
It
development,
oi
time
some
allegorical
races
Zeus,
called
higher
next
overlooks
becomes
reason
process
at
the
Plotinos.
objection
the
of
the
parently
ap-
sensation.
through
image
of
eyes,
in
yet
and
Earth-Soul,
if
that
sight seem
that
is impossible
it
the
its
as
souls
all higher
to
organs;
sense
is also
Realm
Fifth
well
as
no
sky
the
highest
first
at
Earth-Soul,
the
has
information
gather
to
The
This
"
World-Souls,
Earth-Soul
veins
its
Over-Soul.
The
Gods.
SENSE.
REALM,
FIFTH
THE
"
may
of
The
38
ghosts
death
the
Phtinos.
the
body
its
What
being
as
person,
before
Senses.
Physical
and
of
spiritual
earthly
the
Celestial
4.
of
the
with
sensations?
Plotinos,
man
do
to
utter
these
have
senses.
between
spiritual
bodies
Plotinos
fact
During
physical
while
active.
subject
who
in
as
in
case
be
dreams,
be
ideal
the
Consequently,
of
celestial
of
set
of
that
apple
bodies
spiritual
other.
celestial
would
point
relishes
the
of
perception
both
on
of
set
connection
psychical
the
position
sup-
earthly
an
opportunities
the
the
long-sought
incarnation,
reacting
will
times,
at
and
spiritual
On
corresponding
senses,
and
the
two
way.
of
celestial,
sees
of
each
excitations
every
sets
time
the
united,
closely
are
two
modifications
cerebral
them.
has
this
two
In
Much,
ances
appear-
extinction.
"
bodies
to
after
shortly
of
of
Philosophy
vision
is
senses
the
alone
somnambulistic
suggested
the
by
her
to
operator.
It
is
thus
perfect
of
The
of
with
the
animals
that
of
only
celestial
with
nature
here
have
nature
of
animals.
(4).
in
so
in
an
be
organs
in
senses
earthly
the
ual
spirit-
souls,
that
they
would
the
or
the
quiescence
soul
souls
higher
quiescent
The
equally
might
extreme
of
although
have
earthly
and
if
oppose
faculties
state.
would
man
hu-
enough,
"
in
incarnate
vegetables
and
as
nature
higher
the
"
less
in
the
be
of
are
developed.
(Fourth
Reason
developed
that
the
quiring
en-
spiritual
like
degraded
infinitely
a
of
of
case
animals
of
opportunity
an
them
most
The
Nothing
animals
upon
human
human
dormant
to
that
low
asserts
even
has
or
of
set
body),
We
present
would
animal.
an
Plotinos
Realm)
so
this
of
body
is
men,
faculties,
although
men,
spiritual
Earth-Soul
the
sensation
useless.
Animals.
concerning
of
that
any
"
body
one
fact
possesses
become
having
the
without
things
(celestial
body,
Senses
5.
all
Earth-Soul
spiritual
body
explains
of
knowledge
sense.
her
Plotinos
that
case
present,
of
bad
but
CHAPTER
SIXTri
THE
Realm.
Sixth
The
1.
cell,
and
living
Sixth
The
2.
Sixth
Realm
which
and
Soul
its lower
also
phases
"
allo
body
(3).
soul
(*).
It
the
with
that
the
begets
with
as
this
on
Cosmical
is that
of
the
the
various
3.
be
world
in
Cosmical
all
begat
world,
Platonic
the
account
Nous
(10).
just
rigid
as
of
products
from
of
begetting
avoid
which
The
there
are
; but
does
They
the
not
; and
the
consequence
in
cyles
they
the
ing
shin-
everlasting
eternal, therefore
was
for
its image,
it,and
repetition.
necessary
proceeds
tion.
ratiocina-
of
from
was
man
"the
are
working
eternally.
('). Yet
fatalistic
circumstances
love
sleeping
sensation
it cannot
degree;
Nous
that
the
the
to
is below
its images
is eternal
in
led
is
; it is
purposeless
body
as
name
can
and
a
earth-body
earth
(*). This
soul
Her
other,"
the
its
interruption
lower
"
from
its quiet
which
much
exist
yet
in
only
(7).
original
two
body
as
much
the
love
of
necessity
Nous;
of
matter
Earth-Soul
with
simple,
just
without
instinct,
of
word
highest
is
"
of
representant
appearance,
sensation
made
are
of
the
inner
same
Cosmic
as
in
of
the
human
the
; but
have
to
dreams
certainty
It
the
said
the
therefore
; it differs
very
in its full psychical
state
body
materials
with
of,
Earthsome
the
by
sensible
of
self-conscious
be
may
through
also
spoken
lower
is connected
meditate
cannot
This
indicated
Earth-Soul
substrate
not
sensation
of
lower
the
It
but
thought,
higher,
has
higher
the
ness.
conscious-
is
soul,
vitality.
life is connected
is
(8).
Nature
has
The
all
the
probably
are
human
as
lower
of
of
the
(2), as
toplasmic
pro-
between
already
lower
Aphrodite
every
from
it from
this
times
called
image
which
mediators,
distinguish
At
functions
reproductive
is tfce begotten
"
Rhea,to
(*).
Zeus
in
Earth-Soul
have
we
is
being
difference
The
which
soul,
human
apart
Over-Soul.
the
lower
; a
is called
called
the
of
Realm
the
considered
when
the
vitality present
all
makes
body,
in
Realm
; the
body
which
dead
Sixth
The
the
and
VITALITY.
REALM,
"
life of
vegetable
the
XII.
the
history
Stoic
not
are
furnish
only
development
of
or
the
souls
"
The
said
impress
image.
Doctrine
to
of
On
be
of
Sympathy."
imperfect
the
perfect
it she
but
divine
depends
In
if
we
certain
look
nature.
for
being.
we
She
She
Nature
senses
may
is
see
its
only
in
may
her
offspring
has
the
and
existence
The
40
Philosophy
of Plotinos.
the Divine
exists in her (u). She is not built up
inasmuch
as
of foreign elements, as an aggregate, as a house is built of separate
bricks.
She is,in her body and souls, an
organic whole,
elements are all united in the highest Earthan
organism, whose
in mutual
mony,
harSoul (12). As in a human
are
body the members
there is a unity although it be composed
of sounds
low
in
human
in
the human
and high (14). As
a
body, so
ism
organAll
and
member
is
react
act
interdependent.
things
every
all
and
This
is
the
each
means
on
psychical.
other, by
physical
doctrine
doctrine of resulof
sympathy," which the modern
used by Lotze
of forces has re-established,and which
tance
was
"
as
his
4.
"
to
nearer
the
is beautiful ; the
of Plotinos than the belief that the world
had to enforce his view
beautiful world possible. Plotinos
he
Gnostics and also Christian Gnostics, whom
against heathen
in this polemic as being those who
mentions
say that the worldand
the world
evil (1B). Plotinos
thinks (16)that
are
creator
if it was
be composed
of matter
be the
should
to
the world
is
he
that
the
of
God
matter
assumes
image of
(of course
image
is the image of
which
God) ; and within this sphere of matter
than
beautiful world
could not
ours.
God, we
imagine a more
beautiful
in
that
the
made
should
order
It was
spirits
so
higher
into the
be forced to pollute their glance by looking out
not
man
oj the
especially to remind
night of non-existence
; and
who
therefore
be
and
it
of
whose
can
is,
goodness
God,
image
How
his
known
the
by contemplating
world,
image. Again, (")
be said to honour
the invisible Gods, if he despises
man
can
be
their visible images?
the guidance of Providence
How
can
ted
admitin the direction of minor
if it be not
admitted
matters
be called immortal,
in that of major ones?
How
can
a man
if you
deny immortality to the beautiful stars, and that these
have?
have
souls like men
heart
most
above
explained doctrine
Astrology and Vaticination. The
of things, or
law of resulof
the coherence
or
sympathy
ogy
of forces (18)explains all the truth there is both in Astroltance
his way
and Vaticination.
Plotinos cannot
to accepting
see
that the daily position of
a crude
Astrology (19)which supposes
If the
the stars
influences our
daily life in a supernatural way.
then
should
their
ferent
difStar-Souls
Gods
are
they are good ; why
have
little men
we
position alter their influence? What
influence
done to the stars that they should wish us evil? The
5.
"
"
"
are
be littlemore
just as important,
life-givinginfluence of
which
the
than
soul
finds
the
in
sun
her
influence,
spiritsof
they
responsible creatures
if not more
the
so
(21). Of course
is part of the physical influence
into the body of the
incarnation
much
Rarth-Soul
influence
exerts
sun
; for evidently the
the
and
the
of
Thus
of
(25).
men
growth
nature,
powers
of Sense
and Vitality of man
affected by the state
are
on
the
Realm
of the
The
physical
of
influences
soul
escapes
the
sun
and
them, except
; but
moon
in
reflex
41
passible
higher imthrough
the
manner
body (*').
As to Vaticination, Plotinos
the
vaticination which
motions,
so
that
from
the
position
of one,
good
they
one
may
tell the
Vaticination,
can
still harm
we
us,
sition
po-
should
or
do
that souls
by showing themselves, prove
inspire the Oracles, as they
finally,they can
do, not being fettered by the flesh (29).
can,
;
we
The
42
it
entirely
than
on
his
The
have
We
the
of
days
They
between
see
can
(42),
senses
(43) hearing
of
increased
ality
Plur-
of
the
needed
their
inherent
as
no
have
thoughts
light.
Dai-
classical
erature,
lit-
acquainted.
are
eternal
spiritual
(*),
celestial
spiritual
celestial
physical
to
"
God,
all
they
seen
guarded
intermediate
their
by
of
we
in
mons
dae-
Christianity.
by
thoroughly
latter
have
They
communicate
world
carefully
it
development
realm
possession
the
is
of
stage
Like
prayers.
none
glow
rather
and
men
with
high
as
so
was
intelligible
implying
course
intelligible
the
their
at
are
given
was
quite
Plotinos
Gods.
and
in
freedom,
were
interchangeable
was
remained
who
men
depend
introduce
be
must
which
it
which
souls
are
is
would
there
daemon
meaning
Homer,
with
which
that
seen
word
probably
and
mon,"
This
evil
later
God
highest
C40)
actions
many
Unity.
utter
Gods.
its
therefore
the
nature
"
from
but
his
Daemon.
and
and
(39),
of
master
into
In
While
circumstances
even
7.
C38).
Earth-Soul
the
by
Plotinos.
of
Philosophy
body
(44)
language
that
each
souls
other
in
the
_by
an
The
44
the
whole,
in
nor
belongs
that
of
is
diminution
of
soul
The
fourth
can
forms
of
size,
but
is
but
measure
It
(22).
It
is
C23).
It
is unsatisfied
of
weak
its
the
these
The
active
Each
act
course
He
sort
at
of
of
that
be
Being
spiritual
the
is the
thought
Sixth
the
have
To
apply
to
their
by
an
idea
in
seed;
forms,
Nous
ponding
corres-
may
say
form,
and
we
future
the
the
or
Stoics.
the
to
Thus
of
form
the
we
telligible
in-
the
here.
cosmic
the
getting
be-
sure,
of
owed
number.
suitable
be
from
spermatic
Plotinos
of
process
germination
idea
idea,
its
takes
This
of
known
dark.
the
is like
shall
has
as
is
that
also
formed
of
"
this
matter
between
is
matter
the
in
to
which
intelligible,
and
matter
lowest
being,
of
marrow
of
is
and
(23),
by
comes
that
as
there
his
what
still
telligible
in-
of
contention
Plotinos
far
epistemology
he
of
form
the
cal,
identi-
are
and
intelligible.
itself
questions
the
result,
us
is
is
the
still
also
matter
This
is
is
being
Thought
and
Being
Since
Matter.
nature.
pushed
unity
length.
is
it
of
seed.
that
to
little
generation
that
Therefore,
its
never
thinks
of
It
It
measure,
bodily
possibility
C'4).
natural
only
we
active
form
lowest
driven
be
not
is' not
only
(ltt).
quality
it is
;
It
Being
So
and
are
well
an
Idealists,
the
to
"
should
seed.
as
Intelligibility
in
to
sense
the
intelligible.
is
world,
begetting
is
the
is
the
the
it,
in
it
principles
of
seed
3.
the
disposition
or
declension
and
after
Matter.
matter,
of
in
to
shadow
principle
of
two
dwelling
it is
Being;
not
that
image,
things
Ideas
that
(18).
is
it
utmost,
(space)
(20).
itself
yearning
general
side
and
is
of
Being,
of
have
emptiness
without
and
makes
unto
image,
Uncognisability
2.
gradual
(25).
nothing
Realm
size
it
(21).
(18)
stuff
which
assumes
"Asomatos"
the
at
source
one
be
(17).
formless
that
should
declension
is
there
privation,
evil
only
or
there
characteristic
the
if
pure
called
evil,
being
itself
Matter
is not
that
be
of
require
Besides
annihilation,
never
reduction
lower
reasonable
it into
Plotinos.
we
(15).
part
only
of
should
part
one
another
to
it
good,
Philosophy
enough
road.
another
must
cosmology
of
be
some
shows
CHAPTER
XIV.
REINCARNATION.
should
Reincarnation.
for
Need
1.
it will
reincarnate,
all necessary
This
God.
life
of
is
ethical
an
like
happiness,
it;
meriting
for
even
itself
necessary
seek
the
is
lower
all
only
can
the
on
of
form
the
soul
where
the
soul
will
it will
progress,
will
therefore
generate
the
The
a
2.
be
have
for
enough
cannot
heaven
this
inequalities
present
But
here
the
into
such
will
purify
souls
order
passage
foolish
kings
etc.
in
of
Plato
The
accounted
as
retribution
life
in
(*).
is
not
Justice
which
the
for.
their
the
as
worthy
end
Retribution
of
soon
for
; and
Divine
lives
other
(T) ;
free
own
will
(8)
Earth-Soul
(9), these
her
(5).
one
single
soul.
by
retribution
collaborates
especial
one
come
furnished
this
be
to
and
seemed
reincarnation.
enticed
or
habitation,
circumstances
she
has
as
coming
be-
incarnated
the
clear, Plotinos
quotes
sets
forth, for instance*, that
(") which
reincarnated
eagles,
as
quiet
citizens
as
(").
Superficial
Plotinos
of
will
have
satisfactorily
parts
make
to
famous
bees,
not
by
indissoluble
In
of
circumstances
the
why
seen
soul
soul
this
place
if the
And
of
purpose
for
development
purpose
led
are
earth
another
moral
moral
if souls
are
is another
souls
and
is
the
(3),
have
World-Drama
is therefore
this
she
carnation
in-
for
reason
Unless
place
the
out
(2)
procreation
there
Thus
(*)."
already
vindicated
(*).
attractions
naturally.
itself
body
working
Plotinos,
of
We
"
build
incarnation
as
creation
Justice.
long
and
of
serious
as
the
in
Will
purpose
man
of
Divine
itself
propagate
may
then
for
progress,
to
knowledge
for
"
it is
learn
may
The
evidently.
love,
it will
Therefore
mere
desire
have
they
body.
soul
the
never
will
with
of
part
divine
by
gotten
whether
all lower
than
in
had
be
will
that
off
of
they
of gainopportunity
ing
an
faculties
teacher
be
only
own
world
work
better
its
of
the
stedfastly, and
body,
at
is vision
because
happy
higher
or
in
be
to
is after
experience
and
souls
good
Experience
it is
why
life
of
can
have
to
decide
its lower
with
for
only
are
therefore
it. It is necessary
merit, to let our
reason
end
The
one.
all happiness,
Gods
merited
identify
asking
while
worth
we
incarnate.
to
aim
The
be
why
ourselves
asking
Before
"
readers
taught
between
have
theory
human
and
seized
of
upon
this
reincarnation
animal
bodies.
passage
which
There
to
made
can
that
prove
no
not,
ference
difhow-
The
46
Philosophy
of Plotinos.
"
"
raped.
During the intervals between
in
incarnations souls (which are
this condition
that
of
often confused
with daemons)
to
part
go
is appropriate to their merits and their
the World-Soul
which
fering
sufcondition, the good souls being at rest, and the evil ones
in the meanwhile
(16).
to
The
idea of a physical resurrection
most
was
repugnant
than the tool or prison of the
Plotinos ; as the body is no more
perfectio
soul, it.would be cruel to enclose the soul in it and all its imits
whither
forever (1T)- After death, the soul goes
inclination leads it,so that true friends will meet
more
:
once
in the body most
able
suitthe soul reincarnates it reincarnates
when
that
the soul has left its body, it becomes
for it (18). When
towards
which it had directed its activity(")"
of utter and reit may
Thus
indeed happen, that on
account
peated
and
in
tial
besdie
sink
into
wickedness
soul
matter
a
may
circumstances
(*")so that it will reincarnate in an animal or
bestial,it is not
vegetable body (21); for if the soul has become
than a bestial body.
able to form for itself anything more
reincarnations
earth are
The
souls that need
on
no
more
the universe, and be
see
placed on the stars, whence
they may
The
in such circumstances
fitted to develop them.
most
as
are
and
Cosmical
souls
towards
the
turn
rethemselves
Nous,
turn
purest
for ever
home.
to their intelligible
3. The
Three
Factors.
"
There
are
three
factors in each
nation.
reincar-
Reincarnation.
for
is always
there
development
highest
the
unto
even
her
47
soul
reach
can
earth,
on
the
desire
it
for and
care
the world
first
but
enlighten
senses;
anxious
if she
forgets herself in this occupation, and becomes
for the welfare
of the body and for its lusts, she is held down
by
is to
to
of the
(").
place, it is from
sire
inclination, and departicular body (M).
of hers was
Yet, lastly, this very
foreseen, foredetermined
her
in
the
fulness
of
time, with magical
destiny (*") ;
the body the Earth-Soul
she enters
has prepared for her;
powers
remain
for
in the
she was
to
not
enough
intelligible
strong
In
second
the
that
her
own
in any
desire
incarnates
she
"
C27).
world
4.
Oblivion.
Objection from
is the
Reincarnation
souls
do
Plotinos
usual
The
contention
their
remember
not
"
that
former
objection
the theory of
life human
to
in the present
incarnations.
this
The
lower
objection in the following way.
wliich
faculties of the soul, including Sense, Vitality, and Body
include also the passions and the physical memory,
furnished
are
incarnates.
have
soul which
We
to every
new
by the Earth-Soul
the
that
death
the
soul
leaves
behind
at
already seen
earthy
(M). This earthly
spiritual body, with its passions and memories
spiritual body lasts longer than the physical body, but begins to
learnt on
earth, with
decay at death, having in itself all that was
all the remembrance
of the petty things of the life (29). As we
there is a higher memory
have
in the eternal
impassible
seen,
meets
"
which
soul
soul
consciousness
the
in
the
for the
In
of
an
faculties
lower
and
yet
most
he
the
of the
that
and
when
it will
recollection
uses
very
have
become
carnate
in-
into
come
says
that
forgotten,
is put
aside
clear, we
definite
facts he
training which
may
make
life,has
learnt
that
use
ably
probat
lege,
Col-
learning
years.
"
There
If reincarnation
efficient
the
(").
graduate, in middle
if not
all the
that mental
safe, but
soul
College
gave
reincarnation.
Platonic
order to make
illustration.
forgotten
of
interval
and consequently
anyway,
the life :
far enough,
means
is still another
objection to
suicide is not
only
be
true, then
free oneself
to
unendurable
for the
time
from
stances
circum-
being.
is the only theory
theory of reincarnation
that will yield an
It is foolishness
adequate argument
against suicide.
it is foolish
to
waste
opportunities of development
; and
is ready to abandon
leave the world
until the soul
the
cumstance
cirto
and
has
learnt
all
lessons
it,
surrounding
possible
On
from
the
contrary,
them
(w).
the
CHAPTER
XV.
ETHICS.
As
have
we.
of
is
already
pointed
is ethical,
Plotinos
the
highest
contemplative
or
important
Virtue
i.
Vice.
and
practical.
possible to
life.
All
"
But
import
The
virtues
scful
lusts
itself from
the
disentangle
may
the
cannot
purifications
change
soul, since
eternal
the
to
they alter its relation
; but
it
hand
and
the
lusts
from
(2)
freeing
upper
(3).
flesh
the
It
then
its likeness
state
appears
God
to
in
its
also
his
seen
tem
sys-
is the
that
how
remely
sup-
of
by
which
the
flesh.
the
These
it is
and
impassible
it the
body,
giving
disturbances
and
(4), in
original purity
all (5). Purity
to
of
which
of
patent
appears
osophy
phil-
tne
of
(-1).
purifications,
are
of
end
; and
man
have
we
life is morality
this
to
main
or
attainment
theoretic
the
out,
soul
the
ual
individidentify itself with
seeking
reason
Mind
(6). As long as it keeps its purity, the soul
Nous,
or
life is an
evil ; let purity be lost, and
evil ; for life
finds nothing
inasmuch
is
The
itself is
is good
evil
soul
repelled (7).
only
as
descend
from
the
not
(8).
not
evil, as long as it does
good
the
the
of
soul?
What
Anger,
impediments
cupidity, lust,
are
avarice
the
(9). What
pain, fear, gluttony,
intemperance,
are
attain?
fortitude,
must
goods
Just habits, pure
we
temperance,
divinity of mind
(10).
calmness,
modesty,
consists
in
What
the
virtues?
are
for
good
effective
her
"The
(12).
nature
four
The
Platonic
lie in
Cardinal
and
Magnanimity,
Virtues
Prudence.
soul,
which
that
is the
Virtue
effective
that
than
is virtue
is
most
even
the
to
Courage,
Temperance,
tue
unpurged
by virare
is the
of
fleeing
bodily lusts, sensual
the
attainment
of utter
purity.
of the fear of death, that
is, fear
This
ence
the body.
implies indifferbe
which
cannot
anything
or
is
time
of death.
Magnanimity
Those
Hades.
all
to
taken
the
earthly
wth
away
the
advantages
from
away
It. would
our
all
at
lower
who
earth.
on
things,
and
is
Prudence
turning
to
wisdom
things
the
(14).
above
this,
soul
are
"
advantages,
the
of
contempt
turning
men,
being
more
the
body,
to
Temperance
gratification, and
pleasure
is but
the
Courage
overcoming
of the
soul
outside
of
of being
of
the
(")."
(13).
soul
in
of
energy
her
to
according
of development,
is
What
beauty
means
prayer
to
or
be
life
but
hard
discipline
to
is
not
become
to
that
to
find
leads
avoid
God
more
to
evil
(15).
a
or
rule
of
searching
than
this
higher end
the
examples
copy
life than
:
the
of
end
good
Ethics.
2.
Philosophy of Sin." We
must
49
now
enquire concerning
the
of sin.
"
"
"
from
the flesh, its
for turning away
The
of
been
reason
assigned.
yet
that all actions of the body in the
it is as follows : we
have seen
been
have
strictlypredetermined,
dispensation of the world-order
It
and that liberty exists only in the intelligible
world.
is plain, therefore, that if the reason
identifies itself with the
of
absolutely the slave of the determinism
body, it becomes
it identifies itselfwith its ideal
external causality. If however
soul, or with its individual Nous, then it has identified itselfwith
that part of itself which
is free,and outside of the sphere of determinism
The lusts of the flesh lead to slavery ; purity leads
and
freedom
self-determination.
to
We
not
to be a live
are
the
but
embodied
Inside
an
body,
spirit(25).
body, the soul is
preordained, along with all things ; outside of it she is free.
Therefore
the aim of her struggles is to separate herself from
the body (M).
Yet
the
lusts,and
definite
the
reason
body, has
not
"
"
"
"
"
The
50
Philosophy of Plotinos.
learns
kinds
of Souls : the Musician, who
by
and
the
seeks
the
who
Philosopher,
knowledge,
experience ;
it is to love (33). Active and
Lover, whose characteristic power
sensual
exiles from
their true home
turn
remen
are
; the Active
who
easier than the Sensual
are
to their fatherland
men,
like beasts laden down
with prey
Plotinos then says that the
in
sounds
Musician
is led upward from harmonious
to harmony
telligibl
the path to the ingeneral, and from this to ideality whence
is at first entangled in
Lover
world is plain (34). The
the beauty of the flesh,but rises by his utter unselfishness to the
the
science
and
Nous
to
(35).
beauty of morals, and thence
seeks
to
knowledge, is so near
Lastly, the Philosopher, who
from
the
free
him
ness
weakthat
needs
he
to
a guide
only
perfection
There
three
are
"
of the
The
4.
body
(3e).
of Conscience.
Daemon
"
But
who
shall this
necessary
Plotinos's explanation of
Conscience, the Daemon.
guide be?
the phenomena
is singularly clear and interesting.
of conscience
The
Daemon
is not, as might be supposed, a supernatural guide.
of psychology.
It is not an
It is only a natural phenomenon
it
external
is
ourselves
our
own
to
higher self.
only
intelligence
;
in
that
himself many
have
We
principles.
man
seen
epitomizes
identified itselfwith some
His reason,
one
as
lar
particua rule, has
his
individual
either
his
or
of
his
Nous,
principle
nature,
him
faculis that ty
that leads him and warns
has
with which
his reason
is next
above the one
of his which
of
for instance, that the reason
identified itself. Let us suppose,
Tne
their
itself
and
lusts.
has
identified
with
his
man
a
senses,
Daemon
The
senses.
him
of the
higher principlewill then guide him and warn
Daemon
this
the
his
In
of
case
self-indulgence.
consequences
his reason
be his own
would
individual Nous.
Again, suppose
next
in
Daemon
identified itself with his individual Nous
: the
if his
Once
Mind.
Nous
will be the Cosmic
this case
or
more,
then
Cosmic
itself
with
his
further
should
Nous,
reason
identify
the Daemon
could be God himself.
has
could
question arises,why
not
God
himself
o.
full meaning of the maxim, know
self
thyGod.
This
of
is
self
divinity
man
highest
every
is quiescent in him until he have developed it. To
man
human
The
ourselves.
have
God, we
only to know
thus
We
come
(41). The
of every
become
to
the
The
52
godlike
become
must
In
beautiful
and
herself, and
to
polish herself
the
Philosophy of Plotinos.
as
himself
(60)." The
soul
must
turn
re-
three
of ecstasy there are
stages : expectation of
the Divine, absoluts trust in it,and final self-immolation, which
is above
conscious
Nor
can
we
thought in silence and peace.
if we
then
be outside of ourGod
see
: for
selves,
could, God would
whereas
rises into us from within (82). Thus
God
God
is the Light which
is seen, but which is lost in the very vision of
it : for
Ta duo hen gignetai," both become
one
(81). Eternal
from
eternal proximity to God
felicitycomes
(82),the eternally
forced to begin
beautiful,so that the soul loves God and is ever
act
"
again
to
"Since
love
God
him
(63).
admits
become
He
us.
no
sent;
pre-
versity
Diwe
put away
present to him whenever
from
forced
does not seek us, as though he were
seek him
and live for him.
to live for us; but we
Although indeed
him
contindo not
are
ever
see
we
revolving around
him, we
the supreme
uallv : but as a choir of singers which turns around
for
while
be
distracted
from
Master
short
a
contemplation
may
in the harmony, yet when
of the Master, and blunder
they turn
and
we
to
him
then
"
"
"
Ethics.
is
man
usually
is
to
and
is
(7*).
happy
as
or
After
possible.
if
divine
life
wise
if
they
enjoys
man
different
(82),
happy
its
and
man
earthly
continually
of
so
that
nightmare
with
God
he
the
misery,
(84).
be
sick
fault
and
do
the
its
sounds
external
an
enjoy
the
world,
enjoy
into
real
fish
unselnot
can-
all
waking
of
it
hours
the
O53).
depths
itself
The
therefore
deepest
portunity
op-
weakness
consciousness
awakens
its
as
not
not
one
well
(80)?"
happiness
may
at
souls
godlike
of
tion.
educa-
evil
give
souls
man
and
of
means
to
own
this
soul
to
become
wise
the
is
if
to
affect
of
our
wonder
the
when
life
happiness
life,
only
is
fleshly,
the
though
can
the
highest
For
it
seek
not
the
pleasures
Circumstances
is
do
(81).
intuitions
exist
What
not.
are
and
is
pains
its
Misfortune
inextirpablc
the
of
time
has
virtue'
of
(79).
certain
are
bear
it
he
end
that
possible
evil
purpose
happy,
"
we
the
until
as
the
the
says
that
they
must
we
all,
become
to
to
bodies,
and
but
Stoical
so
he
well
as
and
have
we
another
borne
good,
the
to
While
time
be
must
nothing
body
always
not
when
as
sense,
from
soul
sorrows
is
Plotinos
common
more
separate
53
the
forgets
are
CHAPTER
XVI.
AESTHETICS.
Beauty,
that
if it did
not
of
review
his
forth
set
God
As
Over-Beautiful.
the
God,
1.
is
his
philosophy
the
opinion
on
Over-Good,
is
Plotinos
"
is he
so
could
be
not
of
fond
passionately
so
complete,
subject.
Over-Beautiful.
The
Cosmic
Nous
it is the
is beautiful, because
of God
(') ; the World
image
it is the
of the
Nous
beautiful, because
image
are
(*}. There
beautiful
therefore
Cosmic
three
the
most
things : the
Nous,
and
the
Men
who
slaves
World-Soul,
World-Body.
to
are
is
Venus
do
only
of
beautiful
these
beautiful
is
; when
(6).
form
Cosmic
Nous
beautiful
In
The
again,
is
Beauty
(") the
Realm
2.
Nous,
inner
in
possesses
is
especially
of
of
virtue,
or
The
"
itself
nobody
it himself, so
he
mind.
within
As
judge
Manifold
kalon,
of
he
our
of
an
This
the
or
eye
of
beauty
(12).
Incorporeal
the
normally
last
pressing
ex-
tiful
beauin
the
of
the
image
(since the
she
recognizes
of
speak
can
physical
dare
should
nobody
returned
physical
beaiJty
beautiful
to
sight
of
or
a
ourselves
himself,
hearing
statue,
or
before
until
beauty
of
judge
by the
to
of
the
judge
rather
or
be
must
of
we
he
song,
dare
A
have
incorporeal
man
of
of
;
seen
beauty
his
own
incorporeal
incorporeal
become
beauty
Light
Divine
faculties
is
beauty
is the
beauty
(").
Idea
Divine
Sensual
is the
which
soul,
reason
which
is
formula
ear.
an
or
by
incorporeal
sensutffand
of the
formula
Over-Good),
beautiful.
the
itself
being
it himself
perceived
is outside
Corporeal
beauty
cannot
consequently,
man
a
the
Idea
is the
fully revealed
more
have
have
Nous
the
Divine
the
matter
is
kallos,
mega
begotten
as
matter,
being
the
As
until
Soul
innate
itself.
until
Protos
therefore
soul,
the
God,
both
that
beautiful,
"
therefore
of the
begotten
image
Nous
is it
(its Unity)
the
is
is the
matter
(5). Beauty
any
in
Unity
as
(10).
self is The
Beauty
as
Idea
matter
beauty
Beauty.
instinctively
things
beauty
vanquishing
form
of nature
Human
three
one
things, we
thing
ugly (4). Anyit is an
image,
are
we
inasmuch
of
beautiful
them,
only
is
them
to
image
the
way
behold
we
is in
itself through
faint
some
then
Nous
; and
beautiful
seems
ignore
its
Divine
kalon"
noeton
in
far
as
what
When
we
resembles
(7). Thus
ugliness.
(8).
it is
(3).
beautiful, therefore,
of these
faint, of one
however,
in
that
because
things
three
become
lies
understand
not
beauty
perfect
perfect before
we
must
we
just so
give a judgement
can
be
on
Aesthetics.
we
the
oregetai
holy
of
must
enter
naked
with
vision
(")
"
at
God
them
the
Father."
find
we
the
that
soul
every
Those
who
by
which
inner
strives
off
seek
Whoever
their
ments,
gar-
and
the
end
fly
all
the
vision,
of
there
therefore
things,
eye
which
all
the
of
sees
the
body,
indeed
strive
we
possess,
the
eternal
;
fleet
no
to
must
desire
or
and
"
trials
There"
is
our
"
and
very
must
we
more
which
the
there
ships
assume
but
he
of
and
bliss.
any
see
does
beauty
sorrows
came
we
neither
all
for
desire
for
whose
souls,
need
we
what
;"
beloved
whence
God
to
with
burn,
the
fatherland
away
develop."
with
he
into
penetrate
taking
they
understand
forgetting
To
closed
another
which
"
purified
be
does
one
is
from
is
and
after
(13).
into
love
be
of
keep
if
until
cut
"
what
to
yearn
that
first
live,
and
exist,
they
this,
is
psuche,"
pasa
-holies
and
throw
beautiful
and
good
Hou
we
and
perfect.
be
The
"
polish
must
and
ourselves,
to
return
must
beaut.iful,
not
are
statue
We
beauty.
incorporeal
55
but
ing
hav-
resurrect
few
deed
in-
CHAPTER
XVII.
PLOTINOS
Deities.
Pagan
1.
of
system
His
of
sake
his
cutting
full
from
list
the
that
find
Zeus
indicated
life
be
the
Debt
into
Besides,
its
of
orders
cosmic
the
basis
Pagan
4.
the
as
it
was
absolutely
of
dogma
Greece.
of
He
in
possible,
Augustinian
justice
Christian
Light
world.
preserving
worth
that
and
Last
The
Greek
unless
just,
the
of
outside
as
took
the
is supposed
of
to
the
have
do
demanded
the
all
and
conceive
absolute
The
much.
the
be
not
admit
to
great
to
tering
al-
merely
last
and
as
almost
was
almost
predecessors,
Love,
Plotinic
it could
bottom
is the
of
alterations.
by
himself
in
found
three
that
at
public.
Re-
Plotinos's
in
willing
are
his
be
conception
certain
of
source
material
of
theism
mono-
conception
monotheism
in
rigid
may
stood
any
would
Olympic
whole
Christianity,
not
only
this
it
each
Plotinos
absolute
could
is
of
were
of
Plotinos
by
religions
Proof
up
labours
Christianity
God
"
summed
used
Pagan
we
most
them.
the
it not
is
dogma,
we
the
possibility
no
with
this
are
wields,
Then
of
many
One
Christian
Zeus,
tible
incompa-
power
the
as
clature,
nomen-
he
Pagan
without
act
over
called
Kronos
with
Plotinos
of
three,
other
into
Pagan
dogma
of
relations
Dei,
nomenclature,
of
"
of
and
Deities
the
divided
into
existence
literally transcribed
the
then
system
Herennius
when
of
Hippo
Civitate
De
his
the
the
not
glance
we
sister-souls."
apply
to
names
Plotinos.
of
all
entirely,
which
does
totally
nomenclature,
conception
to
if
many
"
out
the
he
Uranus
are
incompatible
seems
in
the
system,
Augustine
that
monotheism
works
Zeus
pagan
whole
his
light
fact
still give
to
; for
changed
and
find
we
taken.
mis-
totally
is sometimes
that
left
If the
"
which
;
is
duplications
many
instance,
in
realities
Augustine's
3.
order
dogmatical
and
find
and
ganism
Pa-
basis
illustrative, for
Besides,
souls
being
cosmic
we
human
of
names
to
for
and
Monotheism.
have
matter.
Hermes
as
lack
important
2.
the
deities, which
total
finding
in
and
conceptions,
and
short
his
dogmatical
merely
are
Earth-Soul,
Rhea,
still ruling
Gods
framing
rehabilitate
conception
explanations
references
as
Aphrodite,
the
in
to
it with
Such
before.
Plato
of
such
seeking
was
furnishing
to
that
supposed
Plotinos
had
not
PAGANISM.
been
by
references
differently
the
has
religion,
it had
as
It
"
philosophy,
as
such
AND
that
same
light
that
of
was
proving
of
God
beauty.
absolute
damnation
of
Plotinos
the
whole
he
race
by
the
of his
ruin
absolute
super-natural
had
no
Plotinos
education
not.
dieth
to
And
conception
of God
forward
God
and
could
tide
not
only
the
over
the
as
cated
vindi-
be
of
emergency
gustine
scruple to say AuBeauty.
of all, after salutary
absolute
salvation
the
to
57
infants
need
we
still speaks
Augustine
of
love
mediation
creatures.
looked
that
Paganism.
unbaptised
made,
had
The
and
of eternal
fire and
of the
worm
,-
The
of the way
to explain his conception
difficulty of Plotinos
in which
God
affects Christianity equally :
begets his creatures,
and
difficulty of providing
Christianity has the additional
an
planation
exmode
for the other
of origination called
creating."
Both
Plotinos
and
Christianity preach lofty morality ; but the
of human
life of Plotinos
is God
himself
guidance
; whereas
hesitates
the
lest
the
of
Son
Augustine
to
as
much,
glory
say
"
be
surpassed.
Christianity preaches
Plotinos
cannot
degree
the
away
of
comfort
resurrection
physical
with
it ; he
being
does
enclosed
the
ot
look
not
flesh
forward
with
all
for
eternity in the
the old body, even
when
glorified. He
guards the
truth
implied in it by the fact that souls when
reincarnating
reassume
flesh, without
them
condemning
to it for all eternity.
Last of all, Plotinos
little injustice in the world,
explains every
any
limitations
every
at
of
sorrow,
; for
tear
every
and
furnishes
reincarnation
of absolute
the
to
eyes
faith
that
scheme
injustice,
somehow
God
is just ; but the Christian
the
before
for
priest is mute
cry
justice in this world
the sorrowful
from
and
oppressed.
Plotinos
is long
dead
since
is
philosophy, as his own,
; his
it has
long dead
died : for it has
strutted
in
about
; but
never
borrowed
plumes since his day till now.
cannot
Yet, the world
look
back,
:
ancient
will
be
few
it has
will
history
a
too
have
on
which
satisfaction
days, God
was
his prophets
in his
and
much
the
his
for
in
time
we
us
world,
saints.
the
or
read
to
and
future
leisure
know
the
name
that
revealed
to
to
it with
crown
look
of
even.
himself
at
the
Plotinos.
in
as
those
ever
cess
suc-
page
of
Yet.it
gloomy
through
NOTES.
CHAPTER
Where
2.
Aniinsi.
Al..
Clem.
4.
c.
1:
(2)
Lact.
1:
(6)
1:
(17) 1:
26.
13.
(22) 10:
4.
(24)
1:
190.
Patritius,
(33) 2:
4:
(44) 1:
(50) 10:
23.
31.
(45)
6.
13:
2.
14.
(52) 10:
1:
11;
(26) 1:
10;
17.
19,
(31)
11:
8.
(35)
10:
7.
19.
11.
13:
12:
(It
Vita.
Plotini.
Christian
1
Beg.
4:
4:
22.
4:
the
1:
3:
(8) 3:
7.
(12)
God
to
cusmati
of
3:
proem
3:
know
1.
91:
325,
C.
"Let
ourselves"
hautous
"
Note
6:
Beg.
be
6:
Knn.
4:
3:
1.
1:
8.
(6) 1:
1:
8;
9.
(9) 1:
4:
9, 6:
3:
12;
(14)
4:
13:
2:
4:
1:
4:
9, 10.
7; 4:
3.
See
4:
36.
8:
in
E.
9.
6;
19.
(27) 12:
8:
14;
2.
10:
23.
21.
(43)
11:
12:
23.
(49)
10:
(37)
(55) 4:
6.
8.
p.
persuaded
(3) Bigg.
(5) 1:
1:
(6) 3:
D.
7, proem
the
by
de
2.
690
(10) 3:
19, 7.
6:
9:
(4) 3:
"Peithouinetha
(2) 1:
general
4:
7:
4:
See
15.
1:
6:
1:
1:
12.
1:
4:
5:
3:
12;
See
5.
(15) 1:
(22) 4:
4:
4.
11:
1:
2.
(7)
325,
(11)
C.
of
commandment
t6
an
12;
4:
tou
parkel-
Theou
gignoskein."
1:
8.
H.
17,
8.
CHAPTER
(1)
(21)
is understood.
2.
1:
(9) 5:
us
16.
Meinecke,
14:
11:
10:
26;
(13)
14;
12,
699
9:
5.
12:
15.
8, 9, 13,
(48)
(2) Eusebius,
46.
p.
10:
4.
13:
1:
5;
13:
(20)
(42)
(54) 1:
Quoted.
(5)
V.
3.
c.
20.
12.
given "Ennead
Alex.
Beg.
7,
4:
is
name
Porphyry,
Platonists
2:
2:
no
9:
5;
(36)
20.
1.
CHAPTER
Where
(32)
(41) 10:
(47)
(53)
(12)
7:
1:
c.
4.
Phys.
16;
2:
18.
21.
8;
9:
Bpit.
Al.
25;
22.
2, 5;
'Stobaeus
8.
(46) 13:
12:
(19)
8:
11;
1:
8.
4, 9, 13,
5:176b.
8:
de
5:
9.
Cyril
(4) 13:
8;
5:
26.
274c;
(11)
9.
11-7.
Ex
(40) 4:
8:
33c.
Lib.
7:
23,
15.
2:
6, 11;
25.
6:
8:
64c;
Jul.
4:
3;
65.
5:
(10)
8; 5:
Tat.
4:
17;
(39) 4:
(51) 13:
0.
3:
1-3.
1:
(30)
(34) 2:
5.
(38) 10:
to
(25) 10:
1.
6.
Hist.
1:
Inst.
Dei,
c.
31;
(23) 1:
Thai,
12:
(29)
8:
1-4;
3, 6.
22.
10.
16.
4.
p.
63e,
Al.
12,
9-11;
(18) 1:
of
57b,
(9) 9:
1:
(15)
12:
Hermes
1:
(28)
26.
13;
Of
8.
19.
56b,
4.
(8) 5:
2.
Civ.
(3) Cyril
9.
4:
12:
(14)
7.
1:
(16)
10:
(7) 13:
12.
5:
9;
Inst.
Div.
de
Aug.
52a,
2:
33c;
31b,
30a,
13.
2:
8, 9, 6.
Val.
c.
Pamph.
Div.
Lact.
4:
16;
understood.
is
Tertullian.
6.
Euseb.
Van.
Firm
15,
13,
Gent.
4.
6:
21;
11,
2:
Adv.
Arimbius
Jul.
1:
Strom.,
Inst.
Div.
; 2
22
Idol.
"
Poemandres
21,
de
Cyprian,
33.
Apol.
Martyr,
Justin
ill
"
given
is
name
no
IV.
(10)
4:
7:
12;
(18) 6:
7:
30.
3:
20-24;
4:
7:
8.
(24) 4:
7:
12.
(3) 3:
9, 16;
3.
8:
4:
4, 5
7:
(7) 1:
4:
9, 10;
9; 2:
1:
5;
5:
3:
2:
23;
1;
6:
(19) 3:
1; 6:
(25)
4:
1:
2:
5:
4:
8:
16.
1:
7:
2.
3:
5:
4;
3:
3:
6.
4:
15.
12,
13;
3;
16.
5,
1:
5;
6:
(20)
4:
8:
3:
7:
4;
8.
3:
6:
17.
6:
7:
12;
1:
1:
(8) 1:
4:
15.
4:
6;
2:
1;
3; 4:
6:
6.
5:
4;
1;
14;
3:
2:
3:
4:
4:
7:
1:
3:
4:
2:
7:
3:
7:
(12)
6:
(13)
(21)
12:
7:
4.
(17) 6:
4:
4:
7:
7:
9:
Int.
5; 3:
6:
6:
6.
7:
11;
(5) 4:
(11)
2:
12;
5:
6:
(16)
(23) 6:
9;
6:
9:
(4) 6:
seqq.
12,
6:
1:
15;
4:
VI.
5,
12;
14.
(26)
1:
62
The
Philosophyof
Plotinos.
1:
1:
10.
CHAPTER
VII.
13.
5:
Beg.;
6: 2:
1; 4: 8: 6; 6: 7: 1, 3; 6: 8: 18 End.
(33) 6: 7; 3. (34) 2: 9: 3. (35)
2: 1: 2; 2: 9: 3. (36) 3: 5: 4. (37) 6: 7: 22. (38) 6: 7: 31. (39) 5: 1: 6; 5:
2: 1. (40) 5: 1: 6. (41) 2: 3: 12. (42) 3: 8: 9; 5: 1: 3; 6: 5: 3 Beg; 6: 9:
5:
4:
5; 5: 1: 6. (43) 5: 5: 9. (44) 1: 6: 3; 3: 8: 9; 5: 1: 6; 5: 3:
4: 8; 6: 5: 10.
(51) 6:
5: 1. (52) 3: 2: 16.
(73) 2: 3: 18.
CHAPTER
VIII.
13.
5: !": 11.
(16) 6:
(21) 3: 2:
1; 5:
1-3.
8: 3, 4; 6: 7: 15.
(25) 5: 1: 4; 5: 8: 4; 6: 2: 21.
CHAPTER
IX.
(5) 5:
1: 7; 5: 2:
1.
(12) 1: 1: 13. (13) 1: 9: 1. (14) 4: 3: 18. (15) 4: 3: 17. (16) 4: 9: 4.
(17) 4: 9: 5. (18) 4: 3: 16. (19) 4: 3: 5; 4: 8; 3; 5: 7: 1. (20) 4: 3: 5. (21)
3: 2: 18; 4: 3: 6. (22) 3: 2: 18; 4: 3: 6, 15. (23) 3: 2: 4. (24) 4: 7: 13. (25)
4: 7: 12. (26) 5: 1: 2. (27) 4: 4: 9, 10 etc. (28) 6: 5: 9. (29) 4: 9: 1; 2: 9:
7. (30) 4: 3: 20, 21. (31) 2: 2: 2. (32) 4: 3: 2. (33) 5: 1: 3. (34) 4: 4: 1, 2,
2:
Notes.
63
CHAPTER
X.
CHAPTER
4: 41.
(1) 4:
XL
4:
CHAPTER
1: 7. (2) 3: 5: 2, 8; 5:
ill 5:
:.: :".
2; 3:
2: 2; 3:
3:
3; 4:
3:
(6)
10; 4:
10:
4:
:'.:x:
8:
XII.
6:
17; 5: 1: 2; 5: 9: 5; Beg;
'_':!":
4:
2; 6: 3: 15. (12) 3: 2:
7: 1. (11)
7; 4: 4: 36.
4:
1 U,
8.
4: 45.
:": 7; 3: 1:
(20) 3: 1: 6. (21)
11.
3: 6.
3:
CJXi
2: 3: 12, 15.
3: 1: 16.
."":14;
2:
See
(29) 4: 7: 15.
(30 4: 4: 6, 39.
:!: !": 3:
4.
x:
CHAPTER
il) 6: 9: 3. (2) 1: 8: 5. (3) 1: 8:
X:
10.
X:
;{.
"J: r":
(17)
1:
8:
4.
(18) 2:
8; 3: 6: 7.
2: 4:
XIII.
11. 2: 4:
7:
3.
(16) 1: 8: 7; 2: 3: 18; 3: 2: 5; 4: 3: 9.
(19) 2: 4: 8. (20) 2: 4: 7, 11; 3: 6: 16-18. (21)
CHAPTER
XIV.
(1) 4: 7:
(7) 3:
A.
3:
Tim.
2:
91.
13.
de
Rep.
10:
6: 20.
1: 8: 13
iL'("
18:
2:
ii'Xi
8: 4.
4:
I: 1-5.
CHAPTER
(1) (": 7: 15.
"2:
1. (6) 1: 2:
r".
(11) 1: 7: 1.
XV.
(2) 3: 6: 5; 1; 2: 5. (3) 1:
4.
2: 3; 1: 6: 6. (4) 1: 2: 3. (5) 1:
(7) 1: 7: 3. (8) 1: 8: 5. (9) 1: 2: 5; 1: 6: 5. (10) 1: 6:
(12)JJ:Jh15.
64
1:
The
2:
7; 1: 6: 5. (25) 2:
(29) 6:
36.
7:
1:
(35) 1:
8:
7:
10;
1:
4:
9:
11; 6:
(51)
4.
8:
(44)
9:
3:
7:
34.
6:
8.
(65) 6:
5:
Quest
4:
15.
13.
9.
3.
1:
4:
8:
5:
(41)
3:
1.
4.
8.
7:
35.
1:
8:
8:
(1) 1:
(5)
9:
11.
Quest
4:
14.
7:
5.
(80) 3:
2:
11.
35.
9:3.
9; 5:
8:
8:
(6) 1:
8:
7.
(14) 1:
6:
from
The
Father
children
the
the
6;
5:
6:
with
13.
Gods
all
from
8:
8:
9:
1;
6.
(43)
4, 9.
(50) 5:
3:
11.
7, 11; 4:
1; 6: 9:
(53) 5:
4:
3:
5:
(47)
17, 6:
8; 5:
5:
5:
5:
7, 8; 6:
7:
36.
(55)
9,
10.
(59) 6:
9:
11.
(60)
See
1:
(68) 1:
Quest
(2)
21.
2.
10.
8.
4:
(64) 6: 9:
6.
Quest
5:
2.
(72) 1: 4:
(77) 1: 1:
(82) 1: 4:
is
retains
within
is
The
physical
13.
1:
(69)
16.
3.
11.
(3) 5:
8:
3; 5:
(73) 1:
(78) 1: 4:
(83) 1: 4:
8:
8.
13.
3.(12) 1: 6:
6:
God;
the
tale
world,
is
explained
as
Hgre,
Dgmeter
well
as
10.
(4) 5:
8:
(8) 1: 6:
4;
(13) 1:
6:
4.
Hermes
sinking
of
the
and
flight, by
6:
5:
its
8.
The
with
world
guest
of
is also
story
gifts,
is
Zeus
called
4:
called
is the
Rhea,
into
of
begetting
of
the
Soul
It
is also
4.
the
soul
5:
called
Hestia
are
27.
Apollo
is
entangling
of
Ulysses
As
mirror
and
image
of
beholding
1: 7.
of
Dionysios,
called
explained
flesh
by
can
is
Circe
12.
or
by
and
explains
3:
the
rise
shown
intelligible
4:
8:
6:
denying
as
fleeing
and
2, 8;
5:
Unity
Pandora
the
parence
trans-
is
19, which
6:
3:
Logos,
the
beyond
Aphrodite,
3:
Aphroditg,
ideas.
the
World-Soul
The
4.
Prometheus
3:
describes
and
myth
the
active
8:
is the
soul
its
Lynkeus
his
devours
all
double
4:
who
Kronos,
itself
of
5:
the
4:
Zeus,
6.
1:
8:
5:
(7) 1: 6:
(11) 1:
2.
him,
intelligible
5:
adorned
Earth-Soul
9:
12.
Uranus
12; 5: 1: 4, 7.
Again,
as
The
becoming
8.
11.
additions.
escaping
soul
Narcissus,
the
(88) 3:
17; 6:
34.
7:
8:
XVI.
8:
(10) 5:
who
Manifoldness,
Calypso,
6:
6.
5: 5: 3; 6: 4: 6; 2: 3: 31; 5: 8: 10.
8iuk.
8:
9:
(58)
(81) 1: 4:
8; 5:
Nous
the
World-Soul,
world
6:
2, 6.
of
double
5:
6:
the
when
"T
(46) 4:
(76) 1: 4:
3, 8, 13; ,6: 2:
Zeller,
of
Zeus,
3:
(63) 6: 7: 31.
15.
5, 6.
5:
(33) 5: 9:
8.
is
Nous.
8.
It
(9)
Note
Xeus,
7; 5:
(49) 6:
(71) 1: 5:
2:
4:
4. 3.
1.
6:
3.
5:
(67) 1: 4:
5.
(37) 3:
(28)
*.
(32) 1:
(54) 5: 3: 17;
5.
(75) 3:
5:
5:
(27) 3: 9:
3, 4. (42) 1: 2: 7; 6: 9:
1; 5:
11, See
6:
(57)
(66) 6:
4:
CHAPTER
13.
8.
3.
(45) 6: 9:
(48) 6:
5:
3:
1:
(62) 6: 7: 32.
(70) 1: 5:
2:
14.
11; 4:
(52)
5:
9.
(74) 1:
(79)
(84)
6:
9:
(36) 1:
(56)
(61)
1:
(26) 3:
9:
4:
14.
10, 11; 6: 7:
6:
4:
3; 4:
5:
2.
3:
34; 6:
3.
9; 3:
9, 15.
(40) 2: 9:
7:
3:
5:
3:
P latinos.
(34) 1: 3:
1:
Philosophy of
the
world
Minos