You are on page 1of 1

Federal Register / Vol. 71, No.

9 / Friday, January 13, 2006 / Notices 2291

DEPARTMENT OF STATE taken to mitigate any law enforcement (6) Summit Marketing, Inc., October
concerns, as required by section 38(g)(4) 24, 1997, U.S. District Court, District of
[Public Notice 5273]
of the AECA. Unless licensing privileges Massachusetts (Boston), Case #:
Bureau of Political-Military Affairs; are reinstated, however, the person 1:96CR10326–002–REK.
Statutory Debarment Under the remains debarred.
Department of State policy permits As noted above, at the end of the
International Traffic in Arms three-year period, the above named
debarred persons to apply to the
Regulations persons/entities remain debarred unless
Director, Office of Defense Trade
Controls Compliance, for reinstatement licensing privileges are reinstated.
ACTION: Notice.
beginning one year after the date of the Debarred persons are generally
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that debarment, in accordance with section ineligible to participate in activity
the Department of State has imposed 38(g)(4) of the AECA and section regulated under the ITAR (see e.g.,
statutory debarment pursuant to section 127.11(b) of the ITAR. Any decision to sections 120.1(c) and (d), and 127.11(a)).
127.7(c) of the International Traffic in grant reinstatement can be made only The Department of State will not
Arms Regulations (‘‘ITAR’’) (22 CFR after the statutory requirements under consider applications for licenses or
Parts 120 to 130) on persons convicted section 38(g)(4) of the AECA have been requests for approvals that involve any
of violating or conspiring to violate satisfied. person who has been convicted of
section 38 of the Arms Export Control Exceptions, also known as transaction
violating or of conspiring to violate the
Act (‘‘AECA’’) (22 U.S.C. 2778). exceptions, may be made to this
debarment determination on a case-by- AECA during the period of statutory
EFFECTIVE DATE: Date of conviction as debarment. Persons who have been
specified for each person. base basis at the discretion of the
Assistant Secretary of State for Political- statutorily debarred may appeal to the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Under Secretary for Arms Control and
David Trimble, Director, Office of Military Affairs. However, such an
exception would be granted only after a International Security for
Defense Trade Controls Compliance, reconsideration of the ineligibility
Bureau of Political-Military Affairs, full review of all circumstances, paying
particular attention to the following determination. A request for
Department of State (202) 663–2700. reconsideration must be submitted in
factors: whether an exception is
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section writing within 30 days after a person
warranted by overriding U.S. foreign
38(g)(4) of the AECA, 22 U.S.C. 2778, policy or national security interests; has been informed of the adverse
prohibits licenses and other approvals whether an exception would further law decision, in accordance with 22 CFR
for the export of defense articles or enforcement concerns that are Sections 127.7(d) and 128.13(a).
defense services to be issued to persons, consistent with the foreign policy or
or any party to the export, who have This notice is provided for purposes
national security interests of the United of making the public aware that the
been convicted of violating certain States; or whether other compelling
statutes, including the AECA. persons listed above are prohibited from
circumstances exist that are consistent participating directly or indirectly in
In implementing this section of the with the foreign policy or national
AECA, the Assistant Secretary for any brokering activities and in any
security interests of the United States,
Political-Military Affairs is authorized export from or temporary import into
and that do not conflict with law
by section 127.7 of the ITAR to prohibit enforcement concerns. Even if the United States of defense articles,
any person who has been convicted of exceptions are granted, the debarment related technical data, or defense
violating or conspiring to violate the continues until subsequent services in all situations covered by the
AECA from participating directly or reinstatement. ITAR. Specific case information may be
indirectly in the export of defense Pursuant to section 38 of the AECA obtained from the Office of the Clerk for
articles, including technical data or in and section 127.7 of the ITAR, the the U.S. District Courts mentioned
the furnishing of defense services for Assistant Secretary of State for Political- above and by citing the court case
which a license or other approval is Military Affairs has statutorily debarred number where provided.
required. This prohibition is referred to the following persons for a period of
as ‘‘statutory debarment.’’ This notice involves a foreign affairs
three years following the date of their function of the United States
Statutory debarment is based solely AECA conviction:
upon conviction in a criminal encompassed within the meaning of the
(1) Jesus Arredondo-Sanchez (a.k.a. military and foreign affairs exclusion of
proceeding, conducted by a United Jesus Arredondo), June 21, 2004, U.S.
States Court, and as such the the Administrative Procedure Act.
District Court, District of Arizona
administrative debarment proceedings Because the exercise of this foreign
(Phoenix), Case #: CR 03–00524–001–
outlined in Part 128 of the ITAR are not PHX–FJM. affairs function is discretionary, it is
applicable. (2) Omar Carrillo, October 7, 1999, excluded from review under the
The period for debarment will be U.S. District Court, Southern District of Administrative Procedure Act.
determined by the Assistant Secretary of Texas (Laredo), Case #: 5:99CR00241– Dated: January 9, 2006.
State for Political-Military Affairs based 001. John Hillen,
on the underlying nature of the (3) Carlos Alberto Correa-Arango,
violations, but will generally be for Assistant Secretary for Political-Military
August 31, 2005, U.S. District Court,
three years from the date of conviction. Affairs, Department of State.
Southern District of Florida (Miami),
At the end of the debarment period, [FR Doc. E6–330 Filed 1–12–06; 8:45 am]
Case #: 05–60122–CR–HUCK.
licensing privileges may be reinstated (4) Kozo Wada, June 9, 2005, U.S. BILLING CODE 4710–25–P
hsrobinson on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES

only at the request of the debarred District Court, District of Oregon


person following the necessary (Portland), Case #: Cr. 03–96–BR.
interagency consultations, after a (5) Atallah Adwani, September 24,
thorough review of the circumstances 2003, U.S. District Court, Southern
surrounding the conviction, and a District of Ohio (Cincinnati), Case #:
finding that appropriate steps have been CR–1–02–71–1.

VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:41 Jan 12, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00114 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\13JAN1.SGM 13JAN1

You might also like