Understanding 2015 Changes to NFPA 70E

Safety-related work practices and maintenance requirements mandate more

robust electrical safety programs for commercial and industrial facilities

Executive Summary
Every three years, the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) updates NFPA 70E: Standard for Electrical
Safety in the Workplace. In recent years, the standard has become increasingly stringent in response to
the increased understanding of electrical accidents in industrial plants and facilities. Because of the severe
and often devastating consequences of arc flash incidentswhich claim one life every workdayNFPA, along
with the Occupational Health and Safety Administration (OSHA), is mandating and enforcing safer electrical
work practices.
Industrial facilities and plants are often challenged when it comes to making electrical safety policy changes
in order to keep up with the new requirements. However, making every effort to comply is essential to
avoiding costly fines, as well as protecting a facilitys equipment and its greatest asset: its employees.
With the assistance of a well-qualified, professional electrical engineering or electrical testing service
provider, facilities can efficiently and cost-effectively evaluate, update, and maintain their electrical safety
programs to ensure compliance and a safe work environment for employees.

Understanding the Severity of

Arc Flash Hazards
In the last 10 years, the U.S. Bureau of Labor
Statistics reports 2,000 fatal and more than 24,000
non-fatal electrical injuries such as those sustained
from an arc flash. Arcing from an electrical fault can
produce temperatures hotter than the surface of
the sun, creating an incredibly hot blast with force
similar to an explosionenough to throw a workers
body across the room. The National Safety Council
reports that electrical hazards like this cause nearly
one fatality every single workday.
Obviously, the consequences of arc flash are
devastating. Beyond the risk of personal injury
and death, arc flashes can also lead to business
disruption, costly damage to equipment and
facilities, legal liability, increased insurance
premiums, and hefty regulatoryfines.
The problem isnt going away. Rather, due in
part to greater overall energy usage as well as
higher system voltages and available fault currents,
the danger of exposure to arc flash hazards is on
the rise and increasing steadily. To help reduce
the risk and protect workers, NFPA develops
and regularly updates its guidelines for creating a
safe electrical work environment.

The Role of NFPA 70E

As the worlds leading advocate of fire protection,
NFPA has published more than 300 consensus
codes and standards, including NFPA 70E: Standard
for Electrical Safety in the Workplace. Designed
at the request of OSHA, the intent of the standard
is to reduce exposure to the hazards of shock,
electrocution, arc flash, and arc blast while working
on or near exposed electrical conductors or circuit
parts that are or can become energized.

NFPA 70E undergoes updates and revisions every

three years. Each edition introduces significant
changes designed to help prevent the devastating
effects of electrocution and arc flash incidents. Even
more changes have appeared in the 2015 edition,
including additional essential updates in the areas
of safety, maintenance and training. NFPA 70E
2015 became effective in August 2014. While not
yet an OSHA-enforceable document in its entirety,
NFPA standards are used as part of electrical safety
practices and are often referenced as part of an
OSHA citation.
This paper provides an overview of the safety
and maintenance changes in NFPA 70E 2015 that
most impact the electrical safety programs in
place at industrial facilities and among other major
power users.

A Look Back at NFPA 70E 2012

Many facility managers have likely made recent
changes to work practices and electrical safety
programs based on the updates in NFPA 70E 2012,
which became effective August 31, 2011. The most
relevant changes impacted safety-related work
practices, work involving arc flash hazards, and
electrical distribution system maintenance.
Specifically, NFPA 70E stipulated the following:

Safety-Related Work Practices (Article 110)

Employers must now document meetings with
contract employees in which information about
known hazards is communicated, thus enabling
contractors to make proper hazard assessments.
This stipulation also appears in OSHAs 29 CFR
1910.269 revisions, which require divulging
incident energy levels for contractors.
Employees who work aroundnot just on
energized electrical equipment must be safety
trained, preferably via an instructor-led course as
opposed to web-based training. Retraining must

occur at least every three years, and all training

must be documented.
Facilities must conduct annual inspections
to ensure each employee is complying with
safety-related work practices. The annual audit
requirement is extended to field work aswell.
At least once every three years, facilities must
audit their own safety policy and training
programs to ensure compliance with the
standards. The audits need to be documented,
and if deficiencies are identified, revisions must
be made to bring all elements of the safety
program into compliance.

New Changes for 2015

Building on the safety, training, and maintenance
requirements outlined in the 2012 edition of NFPA
70E, the 2015 version of the standard introduces
additional changes that facilitate an even greater
understanding, awareness, and mitigation of
electrical hazards. While some of the 2015 updates
are editorial or informational in nature, others
require facility managers to once again take action
to revise and update safety policies to better protect
workers and ensure regulatory compliance.
Specifically, facility managers need to be aware of
the following updates to NFPA 70E 2015:

Work Involving Arc Flash (Article 130)

Terminology ChangesRisk vs. Hazard

Facility managers must ensure that arc flash

hazard labels include information such as
nominal system voltage, arc flash boundary,
and guidance on the required level of personal
protective equipment (PPE).

In the 2015 version of NFPA 70E, the standard

committee has attempted to separate and better
define risk and hazard. For the purposes of the
standard, hazard identification primarily refers to
the potential for harm from exposed energized
electrical conductors and/or the condition of the
equipment. Risk primarily refers to the chance or
probability that the identified hazard could result in
physical harm to the worker, or the unqualified or
unprotected personsnearby.

Facility managers must document the

calculation method and the data that supports
the information on the arc flashlabels.
Arc flash labeling is required for DC equipment in
addition to AC equipment.

General Maintenance Requirements (Articles 200

through 250)
Facility managers must now conduct
maintenance on electrical equipment in
accordance with manufacturers instructions
or industry consensus standards. Previously,
maintenance was only specified for overcurrent
protective devices.
Facility managers must maintain a current
single-line diagram in legible condition.
Documentation is now required for overcurrent
protective devices to show they have been
properly maintained, tested and inspected.

The terms risk and risk assessment have also

been clearly defined:
Risk - A combination of the likelihood of
occurrence of injury or damage to health and
the severity of injury or damage to health that
results from a hazard.
Risk Assessment - An overall process that
identifies hazards, estimates the potential
severity of injury or damage to health, estimates
the likelihood of occurrence of injury or damage
to health, and determines if protective measures
are required.
Risk assessment is now the key to determining the
necessity to use PPE.
As a result of these changes, the terms arc flash
hazard analysis, shock hazard analysis, and

electrical hazard analysis have all been removed

from the language in the standard. These items
are now referred to, respectively, as arc flash
risk assessment, shock risk assessment, and
electrical risk assessment. Additionally, Hazard
Risk Categories (HRC) have been eliminated and are
now referred to as Arc Flash PPE Categories. Finally,
shock protection requirements are now assessed
separately from arc flash protection requirements.
In line with the effort to better define risks to
workers, the standard committee has also made
attempts to more clearly indicate situations where
additional or substantial risk is unlikely to exist. For
example, the standard makes it clear that workers
do not need to take special measures to protect
themselves when performing routine operations
on electrical equipment that is properly installed
and maintained. Specifically, the standard states
that normal operation, such as switching, is allowed
without any special PPE if all the following exist:
The equipment is properly installed
The equipment is properly maintained in
accordance with manufacturers specifications
or industry consensus standards
Doors are closed and secured
Covers are in place and secured
There is no evidence of impending failure

Defining Qualified Workers

Both OSHA and NFPA recognize the importance of
determining a workers qualifications to work on
or around electrical equipment. To help employers
make this important designation, NFPA 70E 2012
states that a qualified person shall be trained and
knowledgeable in the construction and operation of
equipment or specific work methods, and be trained
to recognize and avoid the electrical hazards that
might be present with respect to that equipment or
work method. It is important to note that a person
can be considered qualified with respect to certain
equipment and methods, but still be unqualified in
other situations.

The 2015 version of the standard adds the

requirement that such a person shall demonstrate
the ability to useand not just be familiar with the
proper use ofthe following:
Special precautionary techniques
PPE including arc flash suits
Insulating and shielding materials
Insulated tools and test equipment
NFPA 70E 2015 also adds that qualified electrical
workers permitted to work within the limited
approach boundary of exposed energized electrical
conductors and circuit parts operating at 50 volts
or more must have additional training in minimum
approach distances to exposed parts.
Employees who respond to medical emergencies
must also participate in refresher training per the
new standard.

Shock Hazard Boundary

Definitions in NFPA 70E
Limited Approach Boundary: A risk of shock
exists within this boundary. Unqualified
persons may enter this area if they are under
the supervision of a qualified worker and using
proper PPE.
Restricted Approach Boundary: Qualified
personnel only. Requirements are the same
as if working on or near energized circuits.
Insulated gloves, tools, and equipment are
required within this boundary.
Prohibited Approach Boundary: Removed
from NFPA 70E 2015.
NFPA 70E 2015 Article 130.4(B) states: The
shock protection boundaries identified as limited
approach boundary and restricted approach
boundary shall be applicable where approaching
personnel are exposed to energized electrical
conductors of circuit parts.

Arc Flash Risk Assessments

In other words, the tables may only be used if:

A major revision in the 2012 NFPA 70E update stated

that the arc flash boundary distance must now be
determined for all locations where the voltage is
greater than 50 volts and there is a possibility of
performing energized work such as maintenance,
diagnostics and testing. Previously, a number of
locations could be excluded from the assessment
and calculation based on system voltage and the
limits of the supplying energy source. For example,
a 208-volt distribution panel for lighting and
convenience outlets may not have been assessed
or labeled because the supplying transformer was
less than 150 kilovolt-amperes. However, a second
adjacent panel did need to be assessed and labeled
because it was fed from a larger transformer. Such
anomalies led to much confusion in the field. So
while the new standard expands the scope of
arc flash protection and the number of locations
that need to be assessed, it also helps eliminate
uncertainty that could lead to noncompliance, or
worse, injury to a worker.

The specific task to be performed appears in

thetables

In years past, the standard was also vague and

not well defined regarding whether the arc flash
boundary distance would have to be manually
calculated or if it could be assumed using tables
supplied in the standard. While the table method
of determining the boundaries costs nothing to
use and is easier to implement than an analysis, the
tables are often misused in the field, which can put
workers atrisk.
As a result, provisions in the new 70E make it clear
that the intent of the standard committee is to
encourage the use of engineering analyses over the
table method. Specifically, Article 130.5(C)(1)
recommends performing an engineering analysis
using one of the recognized means such
as Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers
Guide for Performing Arc Flash Calculations
(IEEE 1584). However, Article 130.5(C)(2) does allow
the use of the tables at 130.7(C)(15), so
long as the system parameters and task meet the
table requirements.

The system meets the listed criteria for

short circuit current magnitude and speed of
response of circuit protection
If the task does not appear in the table, or if the
system does not meet the criteria found in the
tables, then the tables cannot be used. Keep in mind
that in many cases, facility managers do not have
access to the data and information needed to use
the tables correctly. In this case, an engineering
analysis must be performed.
Although not new in 2012 or modified in 2015,
it is important to emphasize that the arc flash
risk assessment shall be updated when a major
modification or renovation takes place and that
it shall be reviewed periodically, not to exceed
five years, to account for changes in the electrical
distribution system (or regulatory guidance).

Arc Flash PPE

While proper PPE can be life-saving, far too often,
employees have not selected or used the proper
PPE in order to complete their jobs safely. IEEE
reports that 2,000 workers are admitted to burn
centers for extended injury treatment caused by arc
flash everyyear.
As described above, there are clearly two
separate methods for assessing arc flash risks
and determining arc flash protection and PPE
requirements. The first method is to perform an
engineering analysis. The second table method
can be used only where the system parameters
defined in the tables are applicable to the specific
tasks being performed.

Method 1Engineering Analysis

The results of an engineering analysis are placed
on the equipment label in the form of incident
energy (in calories per square centimeter at working
distance). The worker would then need to select

PPE with an Arc Thermal Performance Value (ATPV)

that meets or exceeds the available incident energy
posted on the informational label. ATPV is also
rated in calories per square centimeter to make this
determination simple.

The 2015 version of the standard introduces a new

multi-table format for choosing arc-rated clothing
and PPE. Major revisions have been made to the
table for determining risk, and additional tables have
been added to determine proper PPE if a risk exists.

Notice there is no mention of PPE categories. In fact,

the results of an incident energy analysis to specify
an arc flash PPE category in Table 130.7(C)(16) is
not permitted. Table 130.7(C)(16) was specifically
created to complement the task tables and is
applicable only if using the table method.

Workers first look to Table 130.7(C)(15)(A)(a) to

determine if arc flash PPE is required. This task-based
table covers both AC and DC applications and
indicates if there is an arc flash hazard associated
with each specific taskyes or no. If there is an
arc flash hazard, workers move to Table 130.7(C)
(15)(A)(b) or 130.7(C)(15)(B) to find the arc
flash PPE category. They then refer to Table 130.7
(C)(16) which lists the clothing and other PPE
required for that category. Workers must wear all
of the PPE listed.

Therefore, facilities that conduct an engineering

analysis must use the results to create site-specific
arc flash protection and PPE requirements. Reducing
and managing incident energy exposure through
engineering analysis can significantly impact and
potentially reduce the required PPE for performing
tasks on electrical equipment, a benefit that cannot
be gained using the task tables and charts.
For example, if an engineering analysis determined
an incident energy value of 8.4 calories, and that
value was recorded on the label, then the worker
would need to choose a garment with an ATPV
that meets or exceeds the posted 8.4 calories.
However, using the previous table method, an
8.4 calorie hazard would be considered Category
3. Most employers do not provide Category 3 PPE,
but they do offer Category 4 PPE. In such a case,
the worker would be required to wear Category
4 protection for a calculated Category 3 hazard.
Using the incorrect PPE or more PPE than required
becomes cumbersome and could actually be more
detrimental to worker safety. Using the engineering
analysis to determine PPE requirements ensures the
most appropriate PPE for the hazard, and thus, the
greatest protection for the worker.

Method 2Table Method

In the past, the NFPA 70E table method for
choosing arc-rated (previously called flame resistant)
clothing was somewhat cumbersome. This method
could also be ineffective, as tasks in the old tables
were often lumped together, regardless of system
characteristics, ultimately leading to improper
PPE requirements.

The tables contained within NFPA 70E provide some

basic guidelines for common tasks, but even the
tables require system information that may not be
known. As described above, if the task is not in the
tables, or the system parameters defined in the
tables are not met, then an engineering analysis
must be performed to determine what level of arc
flash protection will be required.

Arc Flash Labeling

Arc flash labeling became an NFPA 70E requirement
in 2002, and the requirements were updated in
2004, 2009, 2012 and 2015. As recently as 2009,
the standard stated only that electrical equipment
had to be labeled, and listed a few of the types
subject to marking, but was somewhat unclear in
detail. In 2012 and 2015, NFPA clarified the intent of
the requirement.
Specifically, NFPA 70E 2015 spells out the types
of equipment that need to be labeled, including
switchboards, switchgear, panel boards, industrial
control panels, meter socket enclosures, and
motor control panels. The new standard also
makes it clear what information needs to be
included on field labels:
Nominal system voltage
Arc flash boundary

 At least one of the following:

Available incident energy and the
corresponding working distance, or the
arc flash PPE category in Table 130.7(C)
(15)(A)(b) or Table 130.7(C)(15)(B) for the
equipment, but not both
Minimum arc rating of clothing
Site-specific level of PPE
Todays standards specify a number of exceptions
to arc flash labeling requirements. They state that
only electrical equipment that is likely to require
examination, adjustment, servicing, or maintenance
while energized needs to be field marked. For
example, a fractional horsepower motor disconnect
in a 3-phase motor control center would likely
require PPE, yet a local wall-mounted disconnect for
the same motor (that requires a label) may not call
for arc flash PPE due to the locations inherently low
level of incident energy. Only a risk assessment can
determine the need and should be performed on a
case-by-case basis.
Additionally, NFPA 70E section 130.5 includes
an exception that permits labels applied prior to
September 30, 2011, as long as those labels contain
the available incident energy or required level of PPE.
It is important to note that some existing labels may
contain both incident energy at working distance
and arc flash PPE category. This is acceptable only
until the labels come due for review (the review
period for arc flash labels is at least once every five
years). At such time, new labels must be applied
indicating one, but not both, pieces of information.
Clarification is also provided around the need to
keep labels up to date. Language in 130.5 says
that labels need to be updated if the arc flash
hazard risk assessment shows that the labels are
inaccurate. The standard clearly indicates that the
owner of the electrical equipment is responsible for
documentation, installation, and maintenance of the
field-marked label.
Obviously, major changes to the electrical
distribution system have the potential to impact

the accuracy of arc flash labels, and thus, the risk

to electrical workers. However, replacing a fuse,
replacing a circuit breaker or protective relay,
and even changes made by supplying utilities
can affect arc flash analysis and the resulting
field label information. To ensure compliance
and worker safety, a qualified engineering
company should ideally assist with an arc flash
assessment and label review when any changes are
made to the distribution system, or every five years
at a minimum.

Energized Electrical Work Permit Requirements

Some facility managers contend that adopting NFPA
70E is a cumbersome and time-consuming process,
especially the development of risk assessments and
energized electrical work permits. It is important
to note that newer versions of NFPA 70E limit areas
where electrical work permits are required to those
areas within the limited approach boundary or arc
flash boundary.
Specifically, energized electrical work permits are
required when:
Work (repair or replacement of components) is
planned within the limited approach boundary
of exposed energized conductors or circuitparts
An increased risk of an arc flash exists (even) with
doors closed and coverson
Additionally, the recommendation to perform a
risk assessment and develop a written energized
electrical work permit plan for hazard mitigation
applies to those tasks that are not routine in nature,
or performed less frequently than once a year. If
the task is performed frequently, an original risk
assessment with successful mitigation techniques
should already be in place. Thus, another assessment
is not required.
Specifically, NFPA 70E 2015, Article 130.2(B)(3)
Exemptions to Work Permit says that an energized
work permit is not required for work performed
on or near live parts when qualified persons are
performing tasks such as testing, troubleshooting,

or voltage measuring; thermography and visual

inspection up to the restricted approach boundary
(RAB); access/egress with no electrical work within
the RAB; and general housekeeping up to the RAB,
as long as appropriate safe work practices and PPE is
provided and used.

or calibration decal. This provides immediate

indication of the last maintenance date and if it was
found acceptable. This can assist the employee in
the assessment of the overall electrical equipment
maintenancestatus.

General Maintenance Requirements

Building on the general maintenance requirements
established in NFPA 70E 2012, the newest version of
the standard reiterates that qualified persons who
perform maintenance on electrical equipment and
installations shall be trained and familiar with the
specific maintenance and test procedures required.
Additionally, the 2015 version requires maintenance
for protective devices in order to adequately
withstand or interrupt available fault current.
Specifically, Article 205.4 requires the inspection
and testing of these devices in accordance with
manufacturers specifications or industry consensus
standards, including American National Standards
Institute/InterNational Electrical Testing Association
Standard for Maintenance Testing Specifications
(ANSI/NETA MTS), IEEE 3007.2, and NFPA 70B.
Furthermore, the results of these maintenance
activities must be documented and maintained. An
informational note states: Improper or inadequate
maintenance can result in increased opening time
of the overcurrent protective device, thus increasing
the incident energy.
NFPA 70E 2015 now specifies that the equipment
owner is responsible for electrical equipment
maintenance and the documentation of such
maintenance. The latest edition of the standard
added IEEE 3007.2 Recommended Practice for the
Maintenance of Industrial and Commercial Power
Systems as a guideline for maintenance frequency,
methods, and tests, along with NFPA70B and ANSI/
NETA MTS.
Common industry practice is to provide date and
overall condition of the specific devices that have
been tested and maintained in the field via a test

Figure 1. Field testing labels help satisfy documentation

requirements of NFPA 70E 2015.

Battery Risk Assessment Requirements

NFPA 70E specifies that electrical safety programs
should include risk assessment procedures to
address employee exposure to electrical hazards.
New in 2015, this stipulation also applies to battery
work. Specifically, Article 320.3(A)(1) states: Prior
to any work on a battery system, a risk assessment
shall be performed to identify the chemical,
electrical shock, and arc flash hazards and
assess the risks associated with the type of tasks
to be performed.
Specific battery-related tasks are now included in
the newly revised DC task-based tables, indicating if
an arc flash hazard is associated with such tasks. The
tables currently offer the best method for assessing
and evaluating battery-related risks and selecting
the appropriatePPE.
In conjunction with the assessment, it is important
to review the warning signs or labels regarding shock
hazard due to the battery voltage and the arc flash
hazard due to the prospective short circuit current
and thermalhazard.

Well-qualified, professional electrical engineering

service providers who specialize in battery services
can be instrumental in identifying battery-related
risks; performing battery work in compliance with
all industry standards; and mitigating risks to
electrical workers.

Additional Changes and Complete Details

For more information on the changes outlined in
this white paper, please refer to the 2015 NFPA 70E
Handbook available at NFPA.org. You can also refer
to the most current edition of ANSI/NETA MTS.

A Note About OSHA

NFPA is not the only organization requiring facilities
to upgrade their electrical safety practices. Due
to increasing awareness of the frequency and the
severity of the electrical arc flash hazard, OSHA
updated standard CFR 1910.269 in the Federal
Register on April 11, 2014, representing the first
time OSHA is mandating and enforcing specific arc
flash-related requirements (beyond general hazard
awareness) for higher voltage facilities.

Has an arc flash hazard

analysis been conducted?
YES

NO

Does the task involve the

possibility of an arc?
YES

Thermal hand
protection is
required.

Go to arc flash
risk assessment.

NO

Thermal PPE is not required when

the risk of a thermal incident
happening is acceptable.

Go to arc flash
risk assessment.
Figure 2. The thermal risk assessment process for a battery system illustrates how the likely exposure depends on the type
of task being performed.

10

Effective October 31, 2014, the new revisions to

OSHA CFR 1910.269 address the frequency and
magnitude of arc flash hazards in high-voltage
utilities and industrial facilities that operate
power generation, transmission, and distribution
equipment. The OSHA revisions are patterned after
the latest consensus standards, including NFPA 70E,
ANSI/IEEE C2 National Electrical Safety Code, and
other improvements in electrical safety technology.
They require utilities and industrial facilities to
make significant changes to training, host
employer requirements, fall protection, the
requirements to estimate arc flash energy,
minimum approach distances, PPE, and a number of
other work practices.
For more details on the OSHA revisions, see
Emerson Network Powers white paper: OSHA
Publishes First-Ever Arc Flash Protection
Requirements for the Electric Power Generation,
Transmission, and Distribution Industry.

Implementing the New Electrical

Safety Requirements
It can be challenging for major power users and
industrial facilities to comply with the increasingly
stringent electrical safety requirements outlined
in NFPA 70E. However, establishing an effective
safety program per the guidelines can promote
system performance and efficiency and prevent
costly OSHA fines. Even more important, it can
reduce injuries and lost worker productivity. It could
even save the life of an employee working at your
business or facility.
Industry experts, including the NETA-certified
engineers and field technicians at Emersons
Electrical Reliability Services, strongly recommend
partnering with professional electrical engineering
or electrical testing service providers that are well
trained and well versed in the new requirements.
While there is no legal requirement for a Registered
Professional Engineer to perform arc flash
hazard analysis, such expertise not only ensures
compliance with the standards, it can also save
lives since improper calculations can put workers in
grave danger.

As a first step toward compliance with safety

requirements, Electrical Reliability Services
recommends performing a comprehensive
professional site review and compliance
assessment. It will evaluate current safety practices
in your plant or facility and identify any areas of
risk or non-compliance. Based on the results, your
chosen service partner should offer capabilities
to customize and implement a complete, costeffective solution designed to bring your facility
up to standards in the most efficient way possible,
along with an ongoing plan to maintain compliance.

Best Practices Help Ensure Compliance

Electrical Reliability Services recommends the
following elements and best practices as part of a
comprehensive, effective electrical safety program
that complies with OSHA, NFPA, and other relevant
industry guidelines.

10 Best Practices for

Complying with NFPA 70E

1 Preventive Maintenance
2 Arc Flash Risk Assessment
3 Labeling and Hazard Communication Plan
4 Design and Methods Review
5 Accurate Single-Line Diagrams
6 Short Circuit and Coordination Studies
Safety Program
7 Electrical
Review/Development
Flash Training Program and PPE
8 Arc
Plan Development
9 Documentation
10 Periodic Reviews
11

Preventive Maintenance
An optimized preventive maintenance strategy
evaluates the condition of your equipment and
determines the most cost-effective and manageable
solution to ensure the equipments overall
performance, safety and reliability. By maintaining
all electrical equipment, you can help ensure worker
safety and prevent unplanned downtime. NFPA
70E specifically requires maintenance for electrical
equipment and overcurrent protection devices to
help mitigate arc flash hazards.
Such equipment would include:
Substations, switchgear assemblies,
panelboards, motor control centers,
disconnect switches
Insulated conductors, grounds and busduct
Transfer switches and control equipment
Circuit breakers
Protective relays
Motors and generators
Equipment in hazardous locations
Batteries and battery rooms
Portable electric tools and equipment
Personal safety and protective equipment
including electrical gloves, hot sticks, and
flash suits

Arc Flash Risk Assessment

NFPA 70E requires facility owners to perform an
arc flash risk assessment prior to allowing a worker
to perform tasks on energized equipment. The arc
flash risk assessment determines the presence and
location of any arc flash hazards, calculates incident
energy, and determines appropriate safety-related
work practices, arc flash boundary, and the correct
PPE to be worn within the arc flash boundary.
To calculate incident energy, technical data is
reviewed and additional data is collected such as
equipment type, voltage, ratings, impedance, and
other information. To provide accurate results, state-

12

of-the-art software should be utilized to perform the

arc flash calculations. The software enables users to
evaluate alternatives quickly and easily in order to
establish an optimaldesign.

Labeling and Hazard Communication Plan

Electrical equipment such as switchboards,
panelboards, industrial control panels, and motor
control centers that are likely to require maintenance
while energized, must be field marked with a label,
and the labels must be reviewed no less than once
every five years. Specific requirements for what must
be included on the labels are outlined in NFPA 70E
Article130.5.
The new requirement in NFPA 70E 2015 to analyze
and label all equipment operating at greater than 50
volts may be somewhat costly due to the number of
additional calculations required.

Design and Method Reviews

A protection scheme design review and operational
assessment of your electrical distribution system
should be conducted to identify and reduce
potential electrical hazards. Several areas to evaluate
include fault current levels, arc exposure times,
operational procedures (such as remote breaker
control and remote racking), and system grounding.
Experts can assist with mitigation strategies to
alter the current protection scheme, which can
significantly reduce fault levels, arcing time, arc
incident energy, and arc blastforce.

Accurate Single-Line Diagrams

NFPA 70E requirements mandate accurate, upto-date and legible single-line diagrams. These
schematics are essential for documenting,
troubleshooting, and communicating information
about your power systems. A comprehensive site
survey is essential to develop or update existing
single-line diagrams or to complete electrical
system drawings.

Short Circuit and Coordination Studies

Documentation

To achieve accurate arc flash hazard results, it is

essential that arc flash calculations be completed
using accurate short circuit calculations and
protective device coordination data. Short circuit
and coordination studies calculate momentary,
interrupting, and arcing current values; compare
available fault currents to protective device ratings;
and establish trip settings for all types of protective
devices, which reduce unplanned downtime or
outages. Its important to select an expert that
specializes in conducting these studies to ensure
compliance with NFPA and OSHA requirements.

Keeping comprehensive and proper documentation

can ensure compliance with NFPA 70E and OSHA
standards and can help facilitate an investigation
should an arc flash-related injury occur.

Electrical Safety Program Review/Development

An effective electrical safety program should be
designed to support and complement the facilitys
overall site safety program. It should provide training
and awareness of the potential electrical hazards,
and specifically arc flash, to all employees.
At a minimum, the program should identify
hazard/risk evaluation procedures, electrically safe
work procedures, tools and PPE, and risk mitigation
strategies. The electrical safety program must
be documented and audited at least every three
years to verify the principles and procedures are in
compliance with NFPA70E.

Arc Flash Training Program and

PPE Plan Development
Developing a specific arc flash training program
and complementary PPE plan based on the findings
of the arc flash analysis can ensure workers fully
understand electrical and arc flash hazards and
how to mitigate the risks. The PPE plan should
provide specific protection requirements and
recommendations based on findings of the arc
flash analysis.

Documentation should include the results of the

arc flash analysis and any other studies, as well as
a written recording of incident energy at working
distances, flash protection boundary, hazard/risk
category, and other pertinent information such as
voltage, available fault current, protective device
description and its trip time, arc gap, and arc current.
Documentation of worker training is also required.

Periodic Reviews
The 2015 edition of NFPA 70E clarified the intent
of and suggested frequency for periodic reviews/
updates of arc flash assessment information and
worker training programs. Such reviews can
help maintain ongoing compliance with arc flash
standards, practices and regulations, and ensure
that any changes, modifications or expansions to
an electrical distribution system meet the latest
arc flash requirements.
Per the standard, the arc flash assessment must be
reviewed whenever significant changes are made
to the system, or at most, every five years. The
corporate safety policy must be reviewed every
three years to stay in compliance with the latest
updates to NFPA 70E. Individual worker reviews,
or audits, must be performed annually, and the
results must be documented. If these audits find
that the principles and procedures of the electrical
safety program are not being followed, appropriate
revisions to the training program or revisions to
procedures must be made.

13

Conclusion
Electrical power has always come with risks, and potential hazards, including arc flash, are on the rise.
Organizations such as OSHA and NFPA have become increasingly proactive about providing and enforcing
guidelines and standards for mitigating the risk and ensuring worker safety. The most recent version of NFPA
70E requires facility owners and managers to revise and update safety policies, including performing power
system studies to calculate and document arc flash risks.
Compliance with the revised standards can be a challenge for many major power users and industrial facilities.
However, partnering with a qualified electrical service provider to evaluate, update, and maintain safe work
practices can help industrial facilities and power users make great strides in implementing best practices for
protecting their people, their businesses, and their bottom lines.

14

15

Understanding 2015 Changes to NFPA 70E

Safety-related work practices and maintenance requirements mandate more

robust electrical safety programs for commercial and industrial facilities

Emerson Network Power - Global Headquarters

Dearborn
Emerson 1050
Network
PowerDrive
43085
ElectricalColumbus,
ReliabiityOH
Services
Tel: +1 614 888 0246
1-877-468-6384
www.electricalreliability.com
Emerson Network Power, EmersonNetworkPower.com
Electrical Reliability Services
610 Executive Campus Drive
Westerville, OH 43082
Tel: +1 877 468 6384

ElectricalReliability.com

EmersonNetworkPower.com

While every precaution has been taken to ensure accuracy and completeness of this literature, Emerson Network Power and Emerson Electric Co. assume no responsibility and disclaim any and
all liability for damages resulting from use of this information or for any errors or omissions. Emerson. Consider it Solved., Emerson Network Power and the Emerson Network Power logo are
trademarks and service marks of Emerson Electric Co. 2015 Emerson Electric Co. All rights reserved.
WP-02-004 (R4/15)