Professional Documents
Culture Documents
XGoodGov
Submitted By:
David, Lemmuel Jeremiah
Kong, steffie Cherine L.
Roxas, Myjorie
Vergara, Rochelle Anne F.
A-431
Submitted to:
Dr. Albert G. Morales
I. Issues to be discussed based on the activity presented.
social and environmental impact of their activities (PJCCFS, 2006). Among the
recommendations of this report were:
That companies should inform investors of their top five sustainability risks.
3.
III. Implementation processes of the actions on II.
1. In addition to professional accounting associations, the large accounting (Big 4) firms all
state their commitment to CSR and sustainability. An inspection of their websites
identifies that they see it important to both state their own commitment to CSR, and to
advertise their services to others in helping businesses to develop responsible strategies
and prepare reports. Most also offer some form of assurance services in this area.
KPMG for example, on their international website say that they are committed to
CSR, categorizing it into four major areas people, clients, communities and
efficiency. They are also signatories to the United Nations Global Compact,
stating that the principles are aligned with KPMGs Values. KPMG specifically
offer services in this area, and have a trademarked Global Sustainability
Services, which defines CSR as incorporating environmental, social, ethical,
and economic issues in the strategy development processes.
Deloitte Touch Tohmatsu also offer similar services, but devote a section of their
website to discussion of their approach to corporate responsibility and how they
ensure improvement in this area.
2. A number of organizations and accountancy bodies have issued guidance in this area,
including Accountability who, with the International Register of Certified Auditors, offers a
professional qualification in sustainability assurance practice (Owen, 2007). Built on the
AA1000 platform, the program is aimed at both internal and external practitioners.
Similarly, the accounting body of the Netherlands, NIRVA, drafted a Standard for
Assurance Engagements Relating to Sustainability Reports (ED 3410) in 2004.
Globally, the Association of Chartered Certified Accountants (ACCA) holds internationally
recognized awards for sustainability reporting, and draws upon the GRI guidelines in
their analysis. The aims of the ACCA UK Awards for Sustainability Reporting Awards
are:
IV. Positive and negative effects of the actions and implementation processes on II and III.
1.
For the positive effect; Owen (2007, p. 168) reports a discernable increase in the
number of reports accompanied by some form of externally prepared assurance
statement. Similarly, KPMGs (2005) International Survey of Corporate Responsibility
Reporting indicates growth in this area although the rate of growth is slowing and the
nature of the assurance is patchy and is dominated by the major accounting firms
(Owen, 2007, p. 169. For the negative effect; notwithstanding the growth in this area,
there is evidence of much variability in the practice of CSR and sustainability assurance
(ODwyer and Owen, 2005; Owen, 2007). ODwyer and Owen (2005) similarly find
variability and inconsistencies, although they do point to some improvement in particular
practices over time, particularly in validating data. Pava and Krausz (2006) note that the
inconsistencies have already impacted on the credibility of the profession in this area
with stakeholders.
2.
The negative effect; Few countries however, have adopted regulated or mandated
standards in this area (Owen, 2007), although IFACs International Auditing and
Assurance Standards Board (IAASB) issues ISAE 3000 Assurance Engagements Other
Than Audits or Reviews of Historical Financial Information (IAASB, 2004b) and an
International Framework for Assurance Engagements, (IAASB, 2004a) which have been
used to guide assurance of corporate responsibility and sustainability reports (Owen,
2007). CPA Australias (2004) study of worldwide assurance statements refers to the
variability of assurance statements, noting in particular the name use for the statement,
differing objectives and scope, and a tendency not to disclose reporting criteria or
standards used. The positive effect; the ACCA and CorporateRegister.com provide a
database of reports (Owen, 2007) and Owen (2007) notes that nearly 40% of them
included an assurance statement in 2004, more than double that found 10 years earlier.