Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Contents
1. Introduction
JSFR design features & Objective
2. Approach to Flow-Induced Vibration (FIV) Evaluation
Previous experiments
FIV evaluation methodology for JSFR
Approach to the methodology development for JSFR
3. Hot-leg pipe experiments
Effect of pipe scale
Effect of inlet swirl flow
Effect of elbow curvature
4. Cold-leg pipe experiments
Effect of multiple elbows
5. Computer simulation of unsteady pipe flow
U-RANS approach
LES approach
DES approach
6. Conclusions 1
Fast Reactor Cycle Technology Development Project
International Conference on Fast Reactors and Related Fuel Cycles (FR09), Kyoto, Japan, Dec. 7-11, 2009.
1. Introduction
Major piping specifications
Two-loop system Designed Japanese
High flow rate per loop in 2007 prototype
JSFR Monju PWR
Electric power 1500MWe 750MWe 500MWe 280MWe 1160MWe
Number of loops 2 2 2 3 4
Diameter 1.27 m 0.91 m 0.76 m 0.81 m 0.74 m
Thickness 15.9 mm 12.7 mm 12.7 mm 11.1 mm 73.0 mm Hot leg
HL Velocity 9.1 m/s 8.8 m/s 8.6 m/s 3.5 m/s 14.5 m/s (single elbow)
Temperature 550oC 550oC 550oC 529oC 325oC
Cold leg
Re number 4.2 x 107 2.9 x 107 2.3 x 107 1.0 x 107 9.1 x 107 (three elbows)
Diameter 0.86 m 0.71 m 0.56 m 0.61 m 0.70 m
Thickness 17.5 mm 17.5 mm 17.5 mm 9.5 mm 69.0 mm
CL Velocity 9.7 m/s 7.3 m/s 8.1 m/s 6.1 m/s 14.3 m/s
Temperature 395oC 395oC 395oC 397oC 289oC
Re number 2.5 x 107 1.5 x 107 1.3 x 107 1.1 x 107 8.1 x 107
A large-diameter thin pipe
Remarkably high coolant velocity Flow-induced vibration (FIV) issue
Ref.) H. Yamano, et al., NURETH-13, N13P1186, Kanazawa, Japan, Sep. 27 - Oct. 2, 2009.
Fast Reactor Cycle Technology Development Project 2
International Conference on Fast Reactors and Related Fuel Cycles (FR09), Kyoto, Japan, Dec. 7-11, 2009.
1. Introduction
Piping configuration
Hot-leg pipe of primary circuit (a) Hot-leg (b) Cold-leg
JSFR
“MONJU”
(Designed)
”
6.4 4.1
)
Type 304 stainless steel High-Cr steel 4.1
Normal
sodium level NsL Support
Φ5.5
(NsL) 8.5
Cold-leg experiments
1/4 scale: MHI (2009~) Will be
1/7 scale: Tohoku Univ. (2007~) 4.1 Effect of multiple elbows explained later
Simulation
U-RANS approach: JAEA (2007~) 5.1 STAR-CD
LES approach: CRIEPI (2007~) 5.2 SMART-fem
DES approach: : MFBR (2008~) 5.3 FLUENT
Fast Reactor Cycle Technology Development Project 4
International Conference on Fast Reactors and Related Fuel Cycles (FR09), Kyoto, Japan, Dec. 7-11, 2009.
2. Approach to FIV evaluation methodology development
1/3 scale water exp. for the hot-leg pipe
-Experimental facility-
1) Visualization exp. (acrylic resin)*
•Natural Frequency/Mode
•Vibration Response
Intermediate tank Inlet tank (Stress, Amplitude)
•Mean Velocity: 0.8-9.2m/s
•Water Temp. : ~15oC / 60oC
•Re Number : 2×105-8×106
PSD of Pressure
??? (c)
Pipe scale (0.13 to 0.42 m):
ク ト ル 密 度 (U- )D)
U:9.2m/s
-2
(e)
10
2 3
10-1 9.2m/s 9.2m/s Re:8x106
無 次 元圧 力 変 動パ ワ ー スペ ク ト ル 密度 ( 圧 力変 動 PSD/(1/2)2 ・ρ 2 U 3 D)
無次元圧力変動
1.0E-01
7.7E-02
ハ ゚ ワ ー ス ヘ ゚(PSD/ρ
9.2m/s
7m/s
10 -3
7m/s
10-2
PSD/ρ2U3D
3m/s
3m/s
1.0E-02
10-3 (a)
Non-Dimensional
Fluctuations
10 -4
15oC
(d) (b)
1.0E-03
10-4 15oC
60oC
1.0E-04 -5
6
元 振動 数 (-)
Fast Reactor Cycle Technology Development Project
International Conference on Fast Reactors and Related Fuel Cycles (FR09), Kyoto, Japan, Dec. 7-11, 2009.
2. Approach to FIV evaluation methodology development
Experimental programs
Major Elements for the JSFR Piping Evaluation
Hot-leg pipe Cold-leg pipe
Flow separation from the elbow (single elbow), Flow separation from the elbow (multiple elbows),
Significant Significant
Inlet condition (flow in the reactor upper plenum), Inlet condition (flow at the outlet of IHX),
Less
Outlet condition (flow at the inlet of IHX), Outlet condition (ejection into RV lower plenum),
Less
Significant Reactor upper plenum flow outside the pipe. Significant Reactor upper plenum flow outside the pipe.
Hot-leg pipe experimental program Cold-leg pipe experimental program
Objective Re number Inlet effect Scale effect
Reynolds effect
number Multiple elbow
effect
107
106
105
Velocity &
Viscosity RV+HL+IHX
104 ~Integral
Role Separate-effect exp. Integral exp. JSFR Separate-effect exp. exp. JSFR
1/10 1/1
Scale 1/3 scale 1/1 scale 1/7 scale 1/4
scale 1/15 scale
scale scale
Inlet Swirl Deflected Turbulence &Swirl Single Double Triple Triple
Rectified
condition flow flow elbow elbow Single Double Triple elbow elbow
uniform &Deflected flow elbow elbow elbow
Fast Reactor Cycle Technology Development Project 7
International Conference on Fast Reactors and Related Fuel Cycles (FR09), Kyoto, Japan, Dec. 7-11, 2009.
3. Hot-leg pipe experiments
1/10 scale water exp. for the hot-leg pipe
-Effect of pipe scale-
Re=3.2x105 (~2m/s)
125mm
good!
0.17D
St≈0.5(9Hz) No dependency on Re
number
These exp. evidences give the prospect
that we can extrapolate to JSFR
Fast Reactor Cycle Technology Development Project 8
International Conference on Fast Reactors and Related Fuel Cycles (FR09), Kyoto, Japan, Dec. 7-11, 2009.
3. Experiment Based Methodology
1/3 scale water exp. for the hot-leg pipe
-Effect of inlet swirl flow on flow separation-
Steady-state cal. •Swirl flow 9.2m/s --> Re: 3.6x106
Hot-leg •Deflected flow
distribution 15% of swirl flow
10m/s velocity ratio
5m/s
0m/s
No clear
difference!
Region 4 Region 5
Region 3
Region 2
Region 1
0.5
0.4
y/D
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
0 0.5 1 0 0.5 1 0 0.5 1 0 0.5 1 0 0.5 1 0 0.5 1 0 0.5 1
Reverse flow u x / Um Accelerated phenomena
The reverse flow is observed in the short-elbow. It indicates the occurrence of the flow separation.
The axial velocities near the inside wall were locally accelerated in both cases.
The difference of elbow curvature influenced on the formation of the separation region and the high
turbulence intensity region Fast Reactor Cycle Technology Development Project 11
International Conference on Fast Reactors and Related Fuel Cycles (FR09), Kyoto, Japan, Dec. 7-11, 2009.
4. Cold-leg pipe experiments
1/15 scale water exp. for the cold-leg pipe
-Effect of multiple elbows-
(a) 0.18D downstream (b) 0.2D downstream from 2nd elbow exit
from 1st elbow exit Swirling Flow
High-velocity
distorted flow
Flow
Direction
Main flow
Low-velocity
unsteady flow 0 0.42m/s
The high-velocity flow flows into the separation region A swirling flow exists in the half region of the pipe and
by turns. the maximum average velocity is 0.42m/s, which reaches
Two kinds vortices coexist in the separation region, but approximately 54% of the mean flow velocity.
the vortices are growing up toward the downstream in the The swirling flow structure in the 2nd elbow is formed
low velocity region. by the deflected flow and the geometry effect of the 2nd
elbow.
Fast Reactor Cycle Technology Development Project 12
International Conference on Fast Reactors and Related Fuel Cycles (FR09), Kyoto, Japan, Dec. 7-11, 2009.
5. Computer Simulation of Unsteady Pipe Flow
U-RANS approach 0.62D
~12Hz St=~0.54
~10Hz
St=~0.45
~20Hz
~24Hz
Separation
95 62 div.
divisions
Flow
resistance
model
z
32 div. Shorten by half
120 meshes
円周方向120分割
円周方向 分割
90 meshes
90分割 Separation
No RANS in
separation LES Good simulation of exp. velocity profile near wall
Applicability should be improved.
RANS
Fast Reactor Cycle Technology Development Project 16
International Conference on Fast Reactors and Related Fuel Cycles (FR09), Kyoto, Japan, Dec. 7-11, 2009.
Conclusions
1. The FIV evaluation methodology is being developed for the primary piping in JSFR.
2. Related experimental and simulation activities were performed:
The 1/10-scale experiment for the hot-leg piping showed
No significant effect of the pipe scale.
The 1/3-scale experiment for the hot-leg piping revealed
No significant effect of the inlet swirl flow.
The 1/8-scale experiment for the hot-leg piping observed
No clear separation in the long-elbow case.
1/15-scale experiment with double elbows clarified
Flow in the first elbow influenced a flow separation behavior in the second elbow.
Numerical simulation including the U-RANS, LES and DES approaches
Their applicability were confirmed by comparison to the 1/3-scale hot-leg pipe exp.
The numerical simulation indicated
The U-RANS approach is applicable to different Reynolds number condition by
comparing to the hot-leg piping experiments.
3. Future plan
The flow simulation results could be provided to input data for the fluid-structural vibration
coupling evaluation of the piping.
The R&D results would be given to development of a technical standard of the flow-
induced vibration methodology applied to the JSFR piping.
Fast Reactor Cycle Technology Development Project 17
International Conference on Fast Reactors and Related Fuel Cycles (FR09), Kyoto, Japan, Dec. 7-11, 2009.
1. Introduction
A Conceptual Design Study
of An Advanced Sodium-cooled Fast Reactor, “JSFR”
(JSFR: Japan Sodium-cooled Fast Reactor)
In the “Fast Reactor Cycle Technology Development (FaCT)” project
Two-loop cooling system Secondary Pump
to enhance scale merit, thereby
reduction of construction cost of plant. SG
4-loop 2-loop
62m
62m
22m 18m
36m 32m
Reactor
Amount of commodity of NSSS: 16% less Vessel Integrated IHX/Pump
Ref.) H. Yamano, et al., NURETH-13, N13P1186, Kanazawa, Japan, Sep. 27 - Oct. 2, 2009.
Fast Reactor Cycle Technology Development Project 18
International Conference on Fast Reactors and Related Fuel Cycles (FR09), Kyoto, Japan, Dec. 7-11, 2009.
2. Approach to FIV evaluation methodology development
Experiment-based methodology
-Preliminary evaluation of the JSFR piping-
Reactor evaluation is possible by applying the assumption of analogy.
Evaluated using simplified PSDs, which enveloped all the measured PSDs, for conservativeness.
(d)
領域4
(e)
領域5 Application to the JSFR hot-leg
Inlet uniform rectified
flow condition (c)
(b)
領域3
領域3
102
領域2
(a)
領域1
101
(e) (c)
100
(d) Max stress: 28MPa
PSD (kPa2・s)
10-1
(b) The max. stress fulfilled the design criterion
10-2 (49MPa at 550oC) of high-cycle structural fatigue
(a) of pipe material.
10-3
10-4 The feasibility of the JSFR hot-leg pipe
1 10 100 structural integrity was confirmed.
Frequency (Hz)
Ref.) H. Yamano, et al., ICAPP08-8231, Anaheim, USA, June 8-12, 2008. Fast Reactor Cycle Technology Development Project 19