CHAPTER 4

PRESENTATION, ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION OF DATA

Table 1
Viewpoint Selection
Viewpoint
C (center)
3 (down)
4 (left)
2 (right)
6 (downright)
1 (up)
5 (upright)
7 (downleft)
8 (upleft)

Correctly selected
F
%
25
100
24
96
20
80
13
52
8
32
6
24
6
24
5
20
0
0

Not correctly selected

f
%
0
0
1
4
5
20
12
48
17
68
19
76
19
76
20
80
25
100

Total
f
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25

%
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100

According to Table 1, the user can be able to correctly select the set viewpoints
using the Electrooculography on the set Graphical User Interface. With Viewpoint C
(center) (100%) accurately selected followed by:

Viewpoint 3 (down) (96%),

Viewpoint 4 (left) (80%), Viewpoint 2 (right) (52%), Viewpoint 6 (downright)

(32%), Viewpoint 1(up) (24%), Viewpoint 5(upright) (24%) & Viewpoint 7
(downleft) (20%). Viewpoint 8 (upleft) (0%) was never correctly selected.
Data also reveal the existence of ambiguity on selecting. This mainly caused by the
presence of crosstalk that introduce aliasing on signals that makes both signals be
similar and thus making it hard to be distinguished from each other. This is a
problem that cannot be solved by the current digitizer since the signal is identified
by voltage thresholds set by the comparator circuit of the digitizer through manual
calibration. Digitizer calibration is also a factor since calibration is set subjectively
during setup. Feet position is also a variable of this ambiguity since signal since
grounding is greatly affected by the feet position.

Table 2
Viewpoint 1 Not correctly selected outcomes
Viewpoint
3 (down)
4 (left)
8 (upleft)
5 (upright)
6 (downright)
Total

F
9
4
4
1
1
19

%
48
21
21
5
5
100

Table 2 shows, Viewpoint 3 down (48%) as the dominant not correctly selected
outcome upon selecting Viewpoint 1 followed by viewpoint 4 (left) and Viewpoint 8
(upleft) with 21% of percentage, trailed by Viewpoint 5 (upright) and Viewpoint 6
(downright) with 5% of percentage.
Table 3
Viewpoint 2 Not correctly selected outcomes
Viewpoint
4 (left)
6 (downright)
5 (upright)
Total

F
5
5
2
12

%
42
42
16
100

Table 3 reveals, Viewpoint 4 down is even with Viewpoint 6 (downright) with 42%
of percentage of not correctly selected outcome upon selecting Viewpoint 2,
followed by Viewpoint 5 (upright) with 16% of percentage.
Table 4
Viewpoint 3 Not correctly selected outcomes
Viewpoint
4 (left)
Total

f
1
1

%
100
100

Table 4 shows the Viewpoint 4 (left) single incorrectly selected outcome for
Viewpoint 3.
Table 5
Viewpoint 4 Not correctly selected outcomes
Viewpoint
2 (right)
3 (down)
7 (downleft)
Total

f
3
1
1
5

%
60
20
20
100

According to table 5, Viewpoint 2 (right) (60%) is dominant as not correctly

selected outcome followed by Viewpoint 3 (down) and Viewpoint 7 (downleft) even
at 20% of percentage.
Table 6
Viewpoint 5 Not correctly selected outcomes
Viewpoint
3 (down)
7 (downleft)
2 (right)
5 (upright)
8 (upleft)
Total

F
8
5
3
2
1
19

%
42
26
16
11
5
100

Table 6 shows Not correctly selected outcomes for Viewpoint 5 with Viewpoint 3
(42%) as main incorrect outcome followed by Viewpoint 7 (downleft) (26%),
Viewpoint 2 (right) (16%), Viewpoint 5 (upright) (11%) and lastly Viewpoint 8
(5%).

Table 7

Viewpoint 6 Not correctly selected outcomes

Viewpoint
3 (down)
5 (upright)
Total

F
10
7
17

%
59
41
100

Table 7 shows Viewpoints 3 (down) and Viewpoint 5 (upright) as incorrect outcomes

upon selecting Viewpoint 6 with weights of 59% and 41%, respectively.

Table 8
Viewpoint 7 Not correctly selected outcomes
Viewpoint
4 (left)
8 (upleft)
3 (down)
6 (downright)
Total

f
10
6
3
1
20

%
50
30
15
5
100

Table 8 shows the incorrectly selected outcomes upon selecting viewpoint 7 with
dominant Viewpoint 4 (left) with 50% of weight. Followed by Viewpoint 8 (upleft)
(30%), Viewpoint 3 (down) (15%) and Viewpoint 6 (downright) (5%).
Table 9
Viewpoint 8 Not correctly selected outcomes
Viewpoint
4 (left)
1 (up)
3 (down)
5 (upright)
Total

f
15
5
4
1
25

%
60
20
16
4
100

Table 9 shows Viewpoint 4 (left) leads the incorrectly selected outcome with weight
of 60%, followed by Viewpoint 1 (up), Viewpoint 3 (down) and Viewpoint 5(upright)
with respective weights of 20%, 16% and 4%.

Table 2 to 9 reveals the opposite viewpoint is selected because when tester selects
viewpoints from the has bigger signal based on the figure X.X(UI). Also, crosstalk
that unsets the pattern recognition of the software from the digital signals fed from
the digitizer. It is expected that a directly related signal would be dominant since
the pattern would start from the selected viewpoint then an incorrect outcome
would occur when the crosstalk sets in.

Table 10
Word Creation