Seattle Schools Staffing Adjustment Appendix 2015

Briefing on Staffing Adjustment Calculations (Working draft)
Date: Friday October, 9, 2015
Page: 1
1: Summary of GenEd staffing adjustment recommendations

1.1: FTE Adds:
Equity Factor Nbr
Equity Factor Level
% of Below grade
level students
Below grade level
Current FTE
Recommended
new FTE
Recommendation
Add/Pull
Rainier View
ES
3.5
2-Med
44%
2-Med
10.0
11.0
+1.0
HP(1), +29 students above projection
Viewlands
ES
4.0
2-Med
43%
2-Med
16.0
17.0
+1.0
+12 students above projection, add due to class config (3)

At 17 FTEs, there are 1 split, and no overage classes
Hamilton Intl.
MS
0.5
3-Low
14%
3-Low
43.5
44.5
+1.0
+30 students above projection
Madison
MS
2.0
3-Low
30%
2-Med
27.6
29.6
+2.0
+35 students above projection
School
School
Type
Reason-Summary
Recomme
ndation
Add/Pull
17.0
16.0
(1.0) FTE
and 0.5
PCP
ES
1.5
B. F. Day
ES
2.5
3Low
40%
2Med
13.0
12.0
(1.0)
Current
FTE
Recomme
nded new
FTE
Alki
3Low
Below
grade level
37%
2Med
Equity
Factor Nbr
Equity
Factor
Level
% of Below
grade level
students
School
Type
School
1.2: FTE Pulls (Did not received FTE adds in August):

Reason-Summary
+10 students above projection, pull due to class config

At 16 FTEs, there are 2 splits, and 1 overage class (1 student)
Pull split reduction 1.0 FTE added in March
-22 students below projection.
At 12 FTEs, there is no split, 2 overage classes (by 1 and 2
students)
(1):
HP: "high poverty classification is determined by OSPI based on October 2014 Free and Reduced lunch counts. The list of high poverty schools is posted on
OSPI website, under School Apportionment and Finance page
(2):
Middle schools current FTE includes PCP
(3):
Viewlands dropped from the High poverty list for 15-16 SY. It was decided to keep staffing ratios used for the High poverty schools
Start of School working team October Staffing Adjustments: Elementary, Middle and K-8 schools
Page: 2
School
School
Type
Equity Factor
Nbr
Equity Factor
Level
% of Below
grade level
students
Below grade
level
Current FTE
Recommen
ded new
FTE
Recommen
dation
Add/Pull
1. 2: Pulls (Did not received FTE adds in August): (Continue)
Beacon Hill
Intl.
ES
2.5
3Low
46%
1High
21.0
20.0
(1.0) FTE
and 0.5 PCP
Concord
ES
4.5
1High
60%
1High
18.0
17.0
(1.0)
Dunlap
ES
4.5
14.0
13.0
(1.0)
Gatzert
ES
5.5
14.0
13.0
(1.0)
Highland
Park
ES
6.0
17.0
16.0
(1.0)
1High
1High
1High
56%
58%
64%
1High
1High
1High
Lowell
ES
4.0
2Med
Martin
Luther King
Jr.
ES
6.0
1High
35%
2Med
37%
2Med
Olympic
View
ES
2.5
3Low
Sand Point
ES
2.5
3Low
Reason-Summary
(1.0)
-1 students below projection, pull due to class config

At 20 FTES, 1 split and no overages
Pull of 1 FTE added from split reduction
HP(1), -9 students below projection, potential language track issues
At 17 FTEs, 2 splits and 1 class overage (1 student)
Pull of 1 split reduction FTE in Mar
HP(1), -19 students below projection
At 13 FTEs, 2 splits and 4 class overages
At 13 FTEs, 1 split and no overages
At 16 FTEs, 1 split and 2 overages (1 student). Could have be a pull
of 2.0 FTEs
Keeping 1.0 FTE Mitigation segmentation level and high equity
considerations (Mar)
-38 students below projection
At 13 FTEs, 2 splits and no overages
(1.0)
HP(1), -18 students below projection, pull due to class config

At 14 FTEs, no splits and 2 class overages or 1 split and no overages
HP(1), -27 students below projection, pull due to class config

At 18 FTEs, 1 split and 1 overage (1 student)
Pull from original allocation (Mar)
At 11 FTEs, 2 splits and 1 overage class (1 student)
44%
2Med
14.0
13.0
55%
1High
15.0
14.0
19.0
18.0
(1.0)
12.0
11.0
(1.0)
Page: 3
(1):
HP: "high poverty"classification is determined by OSPI based on October 2014 Free and Reduced lunch counts. The list of high poverty schools is posted on OSPI website,
under School Apportionment and Finance page
(2):
Current
FTE
Recomme
nded new
FTE
Recomme
ndation
Add/Pull
0.0
3Low
10%
3Low
20.0
19.0
(1.0) FTE
and 0.5 PCP
West Seattle
Elem.
ES
4.5
1High
62%
1High
20.0
18.0
(2.0)
Madrona
K8
4.5
1High
56%
1High
16.0
15.0
(1.0)
Denny Intl.
MS
3.0
2Med
46%
1High
33.0
32.0
Jane
Addams MS
MS
2.0
3Low
25%
3Low
33.0
Whitman
MS
2.0
3Low
33%
2Med
34.5
Equity
Factor Nbr
Equity
Factor
Level
% of Below
grade level
students
ES
School
Type
Wedgwood
School
Below
grade level
1.2: Pulls (Did not received FTE adds in August): (Continue)

Reason-Summary
+16 students above projection, pull due to class config

At 19 FTEs, 1 split and 3 classes with overages (1 student)
HP(1), -54 students below projection, 2 FTE pull due to class config
At 18 FTEs, 2 splits and no overages
Pull from 1 FTE for expected enrollment growth
At 15 FTEs, 2 splits and 1 class overage (1 student)
1.0 FTE pull from 3.0 FTE added for splits and small school
configuration
(1.0)
31.5
(1.5)
32.5
(2.0)
-55 students below projection.

School still have the 1.3 mitigation granted due to new school and
geo split needs
Pull of 2.0 Fte is from original allocation (Mar)
(1):
(2):
(3):
Pull the 1.0 FTE added in August
Page: 4
Current FTE
Recommended
new FTE
Recommendati
on Add/Pull
(1.0)
17.0
16.0
(1.0)
3Low
19.0
18.0
(1.0)
23%
3Low
13.0
12.0
(1.0)
13%
3Low
19.0
18.0
(1.0)
0.0
K-8 STEM at
Boren
K8
2.0
Laurelhurst
ES
1.0
3Low
25%
North Beach
ES
1.0
3Low
Queen Anne
ES
0.5
3Low
3Low
3Low
% of Below
grade level
students
ES
School
Bryant
10%
40%
Below grade
level
24.0
Equity Factor
Nbr
25.0
School
Type
Equity Factor
Level
1.3: Pulls (Received FTE adds in August):
3Low
2Med
Reason-Summary

At 24 FTEs, 1 split and no overages (3)
At 16 FTE, no splits and 1 overage class (1 student) (3)
At 17 FTEs, 1 split and no overages (3)
At 18 FTEs, no split and no overages (3)
At 12 FTE, 2 splits and no overages (3)
August approved add of 1 FTE (18 FTEs) and 1 SOS Sub. It was turned
into 2.0 FTE adds (19.0 FTEs)
At 17 FTEs, 2 splits and 5 overage classes (3)
Roxhill
ES
5.5
1High
66%
1High
16.0
14.0
(2.0)
FTE and
0.5 PCP

At 14 FTE, no splits and no overage classes (3)
BroadviewThomson
K8
3.0
2Med
46%
1High
27.0
25.0
(2.0)
HP(1), -41 below projection, 2 FTE pull due to class config

At 25 FTE, 2 splits and no overages (3)
(1):
(2):
(3):
Page: 5
Reason-Summary
Recommende
d new FTE
Current FTE
Below grade
level
% of Below
grade level
students
Equity Factor
Level
Equity Factor
Nbr
School
Type
School
1.4: Start off School Substitute: Do not keep the SOS Sub
Emerson
ES
5.0
1-High
67%
1-High
14.0
14.0
Green Lake
ES
1.0
3-Low
20%
3-Low
13.0
13.0
John Hay
ES
1.0
3-Low
20%
3-Low
20.0
20.0
Schmitz
Park
ES
0.5
3-Low
26%
2-Med
26.0
26.0
West
Woodland
ES
0.0
3-Low
12%
3-Low
21.0
21.0
Washington
MS
2.0
3-Low
36%
2-Med
43.5
43.5

At 14 FTE, 1 split and 3 overage class (1 students)
Keeping 2.0 FTE added for split reduction (Mar)
+7 students above projection. Do not require additional FTE due to
class config
At 13 FTE, works under unique school configuration
class config
At 20 FTE, 2 split and no overage class
Received 1 FTE in Aug. It will keep a 1.0 FTE added for split reduction
(Mar)
+1 student above projection
Do not require additional FTE due to class config
At 26 FTEs, 2 splits and 4 class overages
class config
At 21 FTE, 2 split and 2 overage classes
8 students below projection. Do not require additional FTE due to class
config
Keeping 2.0 FTE added for split reduction (Mar)
(1):
(2):

(3):
Page: 6

Seattle Schools Staffing Adjustment Appendix 2015

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Seattle Schools Staffing Adjustment Appendix 2015

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Briefing on Staffing Adjustment Calculations (Working draft)

Date: Friday October, 9, 2015

1: Summary of GenEd staffing adjustment recommendations

Equity Factor Level

Below grade level

HP(1), +29 students above projection

+12 students above projection, add due to class config (3)

+30 students above projection

+35 students above projection

1.2: FTE Pulls (Did not received FTE adds in August):

+10 students above projection, pull due to class config

Briefing on Staffing Adjustment Calculations (Working draft)

Date: Friday October, 9, 2015

1. 2: Pulls (Did not received FTE adds in August): (Continue)

-1 students below projection, pull due to class config

HP(1), -18 students below projection, pull due to class config

HP(1), -27 students below projection, pull due to class config

Briefing on Staffing Adjustment Calculations (Working draft)

Date: Friday October, 9, 2015

1.2: Pulls (Did not received FTE adds in August): (Continue)

+16 students above projection, pull due to class config

-29 students below projection, pull due to class config

-55 students below projection.

Briefing on Staffing Adjustment Calculations (Working draft)

Date: Friday October, 9, 2015

1.3: Pulls (Received FTE adds in August):

-20 students below projection

HP(1), -69 students below projection

HP(1), -41 below projection, 2 FTE pull due to class config

Briefing on Staffing Adjustment Calculations (Working draft)

Date: Friday October, 9, 2015

HP(1), -16 students below projection

Briefing on Staffing Adjustment Calculations (Working draft)

Date: Friday October, 9, 2015

Pull the 1.0 FTE added in August

You might also like