21 views

Uploaded by Siham Darif

cours de Rf

- _S_PARAMETERS
- aptransco
- Two Port Networks_upload
- 1150fb
- Max Gain Amplifier Design
- An-878 Vhf Mos Power Applications
- Music+pressureXperformance
- Amplifier RSL Series
- 5420 CRZ
- Lab Write Up
- IN-D
- EE101 Operational Amplifier
- Sda 1002 Mhz
- 5003_LowNoiseAmplifier
- Slide HoriLab
- Trek 610e High Voltage Power Amplifier
- Tae 2453
- TDA4866_5
- QUES_5.pdf
- Chap Coupler

You are on page 1of 22

INTRODUCTION

We limit this tutorial to single stage transistor amplifiers. Background material covering characteristics of

microwave transistors and gain and stability of general two port amplifier circuits can be found in Chapter 11 of [1].

The relevant equations from those sections are reproduced here for completeness.

Two-Port Power Gains

The three types of power gains for an arbitrary two-port network connected to source and load impedances, ZS and

ZL are:

Power Gain = G = PL/Pin is the ratio of power dissipated in the load ZL to the power delivered to the

input of the two-port network. This gain is independent of ZS, although some active circuits are

strongly dependent on ZS.

Available Gain = GA = Pavn/Pavs is the ratio of the power available from the two-port network to the

power available from the source. This assumes conjugate matching of both the source and the load,

and depends on ZS but not ZL.

Transducer Power Gain = GT = PL/Pavs is the ratio of the power available from the two-port network to

the power available from the source. This depends on both ZS and ZL.

These definitions differ primarily in the way the source and load are matched to the two-port device; if the input and

output are both conjugately matched to the two-port, then the gain is maximized and G = GA = GT. Equations for

these gains in terms of the S parameters of the active device and the four different reflection coefficients, shown in

Figure 1 and defined below, follow:

2

(

)

(1)

S 21 1 L

P

G= L =

Pin 1 in 2 1 S 22 L

( 2)

S 21 1 S

P

G A = avn =

Pavs 1 S 11 S 2 1 out

(3)

2

2

)(

)

2

S 21 1 S 1 L

P

GT = L =

2

2

Pin

1 S in 1 S 22 L

where

( 4)

L =

Z L Z0

Z Z0

, S = S

ZL + Z0

Z S + Z0

and

(5a )

in =

Z in Z 0

S S

= S 11 + 12 21 L

Z in + Z 0

1 S 22 L

(5b)

out =

Z out Z 0

S S

= S 22 + 12 21 S

Z out + Z 0

1 S11 S

Special cases of the transducer power gain occur when both the input and output are matched for zero reflection (L

= S = 0) and when the device is unilateral (S12 = 0 or is negligibly small) so that in = S11. For these cases we have:

( 6)

(7)

GT = S 21

GTU =

S 21

(1 )(1 )

2

S

2

1 S11 S

1 S 22 L

Matching networks can be designed for various criteria such as maximum gain, specified gain or specified noise

figure so that the circuit of Figure 2 can model the single-stage amplifier.

If we look at the transducer power gain of (3), we see that it accounts for both source and load mismatch. From (3),

we can define separate effective gain factors for the input matching network, the transistor itself, and the outputmatching network as follows:

(1 )

2

(8a )

GS =

(8b)

G0 = S 21

1 S in

2

(1 )

2

(8c )

GL =

1 S 22 L

Then the overall transducer gain is GT = GSG0GL. If the transistor is unilateral, so that S12 = 0 or is small enough to

be ignored, then in = S11, out = S22 and the unilateral transducer gain reduces to GTU = GSG0GL, where

(1 )

2

(9a )

GS =

( 9b)

G0 = S 21

1 S11 S

(1 )

2

(9c )

GL =

1 S 22 L

Stability

In the circuit of Figure 2 oscillation is possible if either the input or output port impedance has a negative real part

which would imply that |in| > 1 or |out| > 1. Because in and out depend on the source and load matching

networks, the stability of the amplifier depends on S and L as presented by the matching networks. Thus, we

define two types of stability:

1.

2.

Unconditional stability: The network is unconditionally stable if |in| < 1 and |out| < 1 for all passive source and

load impedances.

Conditional stability: The network is conditionally stable if |in| < 1 and |out| < 1 only for a certain range of

passive source and load impedances. This case is also referred to as potentially unstable.

Note that the stability condition of a network is frequency dependent, so that it is possible for an amplifier to be

stable at its design frequency but unstable at other frequencies.

Applying the above requirements for unconditional stability to (5) gives the following conditions that must be

satisfied by S and L, if the amplifier is to be unconditionally stable:

S12 S 21 L

< 1,

1 S 22 L

(10a )

in = S11 +

(10b)

out = S 22 +

S12 S 21 S

< 1.

1 S 11 S

If the device is unilateral (S12 = 0), these conditions reduce to the simple results that |S11| <1 and |S22| < 1 are

sufficient for unconditional stability. Otherwise, the inequalities of (10) define a range of values for S and L

where the amplifier will be stable. Finding this range for S and L can be facilitated by using the Smith chart, and

plotting the input and output stability circles. The stability circles are defined as the loci in the S (or L) plane for

which |in| = 1 (or |out| = 1). The stability circles then define the boundaries between stable and potentially unstable

regions of S and L. S and L must lie on the Smith chart (|S| < 1, and |L| < 1 for passive matching networks).

In the complex plane, an equation of the form | - C| = R represents a circle with center at C (a complex number)

and a radius R (a real number). Equations (10) can be put in this form (details are in [1]). The results are:

(S

=

S11* )

22

(11a )

CL

(11b)

RL =

(11c )

= S11 S 22 S12 S 21

S 22

S12 S 21

S 22

Similar results can be obtained for the input stability circle by interchanging S11, and S22:

(S

=

(12a )

CS

(12b)

RS =

*

)

S 22

11

S 22

S12 S 21

2

S11

Given the S parameters of the device, we can plot the input and output stability circles to define where |in| = 1 and

|out| = 1. On one side of the input stability circle we will have |out| (or |in|) < 1, while on the other side we will

have |out| (or |in|) > 1. These regions are defined in Figure 3 for the indicated values of |in|.

If the device is unconditionally stable, the stability circles must be completely outside (or totally enclose) the Smith

chard. Alternatively, it can be shown that the amplifier will be unconditionally stable if the following necessary and

sufficient conditions are met:

Figure 3. Output stability circles for a conditionally stable device. (a) |S11| < 1. (b) |S11| > 1.

2

1 S11 S 22

(13a )

K=

(13b)

<1

2 S12 S 21

>1

Recently, a new criterion has been derived that combines the K- parameters into a test involving only a singe

parameter, . The details of the derivation can be found in [2].

(14)

1 S11

S 22 S11* + S 21 S12

>1

To illustrate the method for determining stability, we will do Example 11.2 from [1]. All references to equations are

to that text. Mathcad will be used for this example.

Example 11.2

as follows:

The S parameters for the HP HFET-102 GaAs FET at 2 GHz with a bias voltage Vgs = 0 are given

0.894 e

0.020 e

S :=

3.122 ej 123.6 deg 0.781 e j 27.6 deg

j 60.6 deg

j 62.4 deg

Determine the stability of this transistor by calculating K and ||, and plot the stability circles.

Solution

From equations 11.31 and 11.24 we compute K and || as

:= S

K :=

1+

= 0.696

)2 (

S1 , 1

)2 (

S2 , 2

)2

2 S1 , 2 S2 , 1

K = 0.607

Since | | < 1, but K <1, the device is potentially unstable. The centers and radii of the stability circles are given by equations

11.28 and 11.29

C L :=

S 2 , 2 S 1 , 1

RS :=

)2 (

)2

S1 , 2 S2 , 1

RL :=

C S :=

S2, 2

S2, 2

)2 (

S1, 1

)2 (

)2

S1 , 2 S2 , 1

S1, 1

)2 (

RL = 0.5

)2

S 1 , 1 S 2 , 2

C L = 1.363

C S = 1.132

RS = 0.199

)2

This data can be used to plot the input and output stability circles. First, the smith chart must be constructed. The

contours for a Smith chart are stored in the file smithc.prn. First read in this file and set up the plot using the

following commands:

X := READPRN( "smithc.prn")

k := 1 .. rows( X)

SR := X ORIGIN

SI := X ORIGIN+ 1

These instructions plot the first column of numbers in the .prn file on the horizontal axis against the second column

on the vertical axis, creating a simplified Smith chart, with the following gridlines:

Circles of constant resistance r for r = 0, .2, .5, 1, 2, and 5.

Contours of constant reactance x are at x = 0, .2, .5, 1, 2, 5, -.2, -.5,- 1, -2, and -5.

To plot the stability circles on the chart, plot the vector, CL + RL and CS = RS. The sequence of instructions below

shows this procedure.

f ( , ) := exp( j )

step := 0 , .01 .. 1

((

((

((

((

realCS ( step) := Re f RS , 2 step + CS

The unstable regions of operation are the intersections of the stability circles and the outer edge of the Smith chart

shown below.

Circles of

constant

resistancefor r =

0, .2, .5, 1, 2,

and 5.

Contours of

constant

reactance forx

= 0, .2, .5, 1,

2, 5, -.2, -.5,1, -2, and -5.

Load stabiltiy circle

Center, load stability circle

Source stability circle

Center, source stability circle

Design for Maximum Gain (Conjugate Matching)

After the stability of the transistor has been determined, and the stable regions for S and L have been located on

the Smith chart, the input and output matching sections can be designed. Since G0 of (8b) is fixed for a given

transistor, the overall gain of the amplifier will be controlled by the gains, GS and GL, of the matching sections.

Maximum gain will be realized when these sections provide a conjugate match between the amplifier source or load

impedance and the transistor. Because most transistors appear as a significant impedance mismatch (large |S11| and

|S22|), the resulting frequency response will be narrowband. In the next section we will discuss how to design for

less than maximum gain, with a corresponding improvement in bandwidth. Broadband amplifier design will be

discussed in the next tutorial.

With reference to Figure 2 and our knowledge of conjugate impedance matching, we know that maximum power

transfer from the input matching network to the transistor will occur when in = S* and the maximum power

transfer from the transistor to the output matching network will occur when out = L*. Then, assuming lossless

matching sections, these conditions will maximize the overall transducer gain. By satisfying these criteria and

manipulating the equations given above (see [1] for details), the values for S and L are:

(15a )

S =

B1 B12 4 C 2

2C1

L =

(15b)

B2 B22 4 C 2

2C 2

where

2

S11

(16a )

B1 = 1 + S 11 S 22

(16b)

B2 = 1 + S 22

(16c )

*

C1 = S11 S 22

(16c )

C 2 = S 22 S11*

2

2

Example 11.3 [1] Design an amplifier for maximum gain at 4.0 GHz using single-stub matching sections.

Calculate the plot the input return loss and the gain from 3 to 5 GHz.

The S parameters at 4.0 GHz for the GaAs FET are given as follows:

S :=

2.6 e1j 76 deg 0.73 e 1j 54 deg

Solution

We first check the stability of the transistor. From equations 11.31 and 11.32 we compute K and || as

:= S

K :=

1+

= 0.488

)2 (

S1 , 1

)2 (

S2 , 2

)2

K = 1.195

2 S1 , 2 S2 , 1

Since || < 1, and K > 1, the device is unconditionally stable at 4.0 GHz. There is no need to plot the stability

circles. For maximum gain, we should design the matching sections for a conjugate match to the transistor. Thus,

S = *in and L = *out, and S, L can be determined from (11.43) and (11.44):

B1 := 1 +

S1 , 1

)2 (

S2 , 2

)2 (

)2

B2 := 1 +

S2 , 2

)2 (

S1 , 1

)2 (

)2

C1 := S1 , 1 S2 , 2

C2 := S2 , 2 S1 , 1

We use the proper sign for equations (11.43) so that S < 1 and L < 1 since |S11| < 1.

S :=

L :=

B1

B1 4 ( C1

2

)2

2 C1

B2

B2 4 ( C2

2

2 C2

)2

( )

S = 0.872

L = 0.876

( )

dB := 1

GSdB := 10 log

G0dB := 10 log( S2 , 1

GSdB = 6.197 dB

) 2

G0dB = 8.299 dB

1 ( L )2

GLdB := 10 log

( 1 S ) 2

2, 2 L

GLdB = 2.213 dB

GTmaxdB := GSdB + G0dB + GLdB

GTmaxdB = 16.71 dB

To match the source, we first calculate the normalized admittance looking toward the input generator (the load in

this case) from the output of the source matching network. It is given by

Z0 := 50

yS :=

1 S

yS = 0.3 1.819j

1 + S

We must now move toward the load (the 50 internal impedance of the generator) to a point where the real part of

the normalized admittance on a 50 line is equal to 1.

2j

1 S e

yS ( ) :=

Guess:

:= 1

2j

1 + S e

:= 0 ,

.. 2

20

2

:= .9

( (

:= root Re yS ( ) 1 ,

= 0.75

Re y S ( )

lSt :=

lSt = 0.119

yS 2 lSt = 1 + 3.559j

so we need an open circuited stub with a normalized suseptance of 3.559. This line has length

lSopen :=

1

2

( ( (

atan Im yS 2 lSt

)))

lSopen = 0.206

yL :=

1 L

1 + L

yL = 0.089 0.586j

We must now move toward the load to a point where the real part of the normalized admittance on a 50 line is

equal to 1.

yL( ) :=

2j

1 Le

2j

1 + Le

:= 1

:= 0 ,

.. 2

20

The final amplifier circuit created in Serenade Design Suite is shown in Figure 4.

Figure 4. Serenade Design Suite schematic of the design of Example 11-3 [1].

This circuit only shows the RF components; the amplifier will also require some bias circuitry. The return loss and

gain were calculated using Serenade Design Suite, using a .flp file for the transistor created from the S parameters

given above. The contents of the .flp file are:

FET11_3 3GHZ 5GHZ 3 50 1

*FET for Example

FET for Example 11.3 of Pozar.

3GHZ 0.80 -89.0 2.86 99.0 0.03 56.0 0.76 -41.0

4GHZ 0.72 -116.0 2.60 76.0 0.03 57.0 0.73 -54.0

5GHZ 0.66 -142.0 2.39 54.0 0.03 62.0 0.72 -68.0

The results of the simulation are plotted in Figure 5, and show the expected gain of 16.7 dB at 4.0 GHz, with a very

good return loss. The bandwidth where the gain drops by I dB is about 2.5%.

Design for a Specific Gain

In many cases it is preferable to design for less than the maximum obtainable gain, to improve bandwidth or to

obtain a specific value of amplifier gain. This can be done by designing the input and output matching sections to

have less than maximum gains; in other words, mismatches are purposely introduced to reduce the overall gain. The

design procedure is facilitated by plotting constant gain circles on the Smith chart, to represent loci of S and L that

give fixed values of gain (GS and GL). To simplify our discussion, we will only treat the case of a unilateral device.

The more general case of a bilateral device are discussed in detail in references cited in [1].

In many practical cases |S12| is small enough to be ignored, and the device can then be assumed to be unilateral.

This greatly simplifies the design procedure. The error in the transducer gain caused by approximating |S21| as zero

is given by the ratio GT/GTU. It can be shown that this ratio is bounded by

(17)

(1 + U )

<

GT

1

<

GTU (1 U )2

(18)

U=

S12 S 21 S11 S 22

(1 S )(1 S )

2

11

22

For a design for specific gain we first define normalized gain factors as

(19a )

(19b)

gS =

gL =

1 S

(1 )

(1 )

1 S11 S

1 L

1 S 22 L

11

22

For fixed values of gS and gL, (19) represent circles on the S or L plane with center and radius given by

10

( 20a )

( 20b)

CS =

RS =

g S S11*

1 (1 g S ) S 11

1 g S 1 S11

1 (1 g S ) S11

( 21a )

( 21b)

CL =

RL =

*

g L S 22

1 (1 g L ) S 22

1 g L 1 S 22

1 (1 g L ) S 22

These results can be used to plot a family of circles of constant gain for the input and output sections. Then S and

L can be chosen along these circles to provide the desired gains. The choices for S and L are not unique, but it

makes sense to choose points close to the center of the Smith chart to minimize the mismatch and thus maximize the

bandwidth. We now illustrate an amplifier design for specified gain by doing Example 11.4 of [1] using Mathcad.

(Again, references to equation numbers are for those in [1].)

Example 11.4 Design an amplifier to have a gain of 11 dB at 4.0 GHz. Plot constant gain circles for GS = 2 dB

and 3 dB, and GL = 0 dB and 1 dB. Calculate and plot the input return loss and overall amplifier gain from 3 to 5

GHz. The S parameters at 4.0 GHz for the FET are given as follows:

1j 120 deg

0.75 e

S :=

2.5 e1j 80 deg

1j 70 deg

0.6 e

Solution

Since S12 = 0 and |S11| <1 and |S22| <1, the transistor is unilateral and unconditionally stable. From (11.48) we

calculate the maximum matching section gains as

dB := 1

GSmaxdB := 10 log

1 ( S1 , 1

G0dB := 10 log( S2 , 1

GLmaxdB := 10 log

) 2

G0dB = 7.959 dB

1 ( S2 , 2

GSmaxdB = 3.59 dB

GLmaxdB = 1.938 dB

GTmaxdB := GSmaxdB + G0dB + GLmaxdB

GTmaxdB = 13.487 dB

Thus we have 2.5 dB more gain than is required by the specifications. We use (11.49), (11.52), and (11.53) to

calculate the following data for the constant gain circles.

11

gS ( GS) := GS 1 ( S1 , 1

) 2

gL( GL) := GL 1 ( S2 , 2

) 2

CS ( GS) :=

RS ( GS) :=

CL( GL) :=

RL( GL) :=

gS ( GS) S1 , 1

1 ( 1 gS ( GS) ) ( S1 , 1

)2

1 gS ( GS) 1 ( S1 , 1

) 2

2

1 ( 1 gS ( GS) ) ( S1 , 1 )

gL( GL) S2 , 2

1 ( 1 gL( GL) ) ( S2 , 2

)2

1 gL( GL) 1 ( S2 , 2

) 2

2

1 ( 1 gL( GL) ) ( S2 , 2 )

For

GSdB3

GSdB3 := 3 dB

gS ( GS3) = 0.873

GS3 := 10

10

GS3 = 1.995

CS ( GS3) = 0.705

RS ( GS3) = 0.168

GSdB2

GSdB2 := 2 dB

gS ( GS2) = 0.693

GS2 := 10

10

GS2 = 1.585

CS ( GS2) = 0.628

RS ( GS2) = 0.293

GLdB1

GLdB1 := 1 dB

gL( GL1) = 0.806

GL1 := 10

10

GL1 = 1.259

GLdB0

GLdB0 := 0 dB

gL( GL0) = 0.64

GL0 := 10

10

GL0 = 1

This data can be used to plot the noise figure circle on the Smith chart. As in previous examples, we need to

generate the Smith chart. The contours for a Smith chart are stored in the file smithc.prn. First read in this file

and set up the plot using the following commands:

X := READPRN( "smithc.prn")

k := 1 .. rows( X)

SR := X ORIGIN

SI := X ORIGIN+ 1

12

These instructions plot the first column of numbers in the .prn file on the horizontal axis against the second column

on the vertical axis, creating a simplified Smith chart, with the following gridlines:

Circles of constant resistance r for r = 0, .2, .5, 1, 2, and 5.

Contours of constant reactance x are at x = 0, .2, .5, 1, 2, 5, -.2, -.5,- 1, -2, and -5.

To plot the gain circles on the chart, plot the vector, CS + RS. The sequence of instructions below shows this

procedure.

f ( , ) := exp( j )

step := 0 , .01 .. 1

((

)

)

CSI( step , GS) := Im( f ( RS ( GS) , 2 step) + CS ( GS) )

The source gain circle is plotted below in Figure 6. We do the same for the load gain circles.

f ( , ) := exp( j )

step := 0 , .01 .. 1

((

((

The choices for the design values of reflection coefficients are those closest to the center of the Smith Chart

satisfying the design requirement of 11 dB. We choose GS = 2 dB and GL = 1 dB so that the reflection coefficients

have values

j arg( CS ( GS2 ) )

S :=

CS ( GS2) RS ( GS2) ) e

L :=

( )

S = 0.336

L = 0.216

arg L = 70 deg

( )

To match the source, we first calculate the normalized admittance looking toward the input generator (the load in

this case) from the output of the source matching network. It is given by

Z0 := 50

yS :=

1 S

yS = 1.142 0.748j

1 + S

We must now move toward the load (the 50 internal impedance of the generator) to a point where the real part of

the normalized admittance on a 50 line is equal to 1.

yS ( ) :=

Guess:

2j

1 S e

:= 1

2j

1 + S e

:= 0 ,

.. 2

20

:= .9

( (

:= root Re yS ( ) 1 ,

Re y S ( )

= 1.138

lSt :=

lSt = 0.181

13

3 dB source gain

Center, 3 dB source gain

2 dB source gain

Center, 2 dB source gain

1 dB load gain

Center, 1 dB load gain

0dB load gain

Center, 0 dB load gain

At this point the normalized admittance is

y S 2 l St = 1 + 0.713j

14

so we need an open circuited stub with a normalized suseptance of 3.559. This line has length

lSopen :=

1

2

( ( (

atan Im yS 2 lSt

)))

lSopen = 0.099

yL :=

1 L

yL = 0.798 0.34j

1 + L

We must now move toward the load to a point where the real part of the normalized admittance on a 50 line is

equal to 1.

yL( ) :=

2j

1 Le

:= 1

2j

1 + Le

Guess:

:= 0 ,

.. 2

20

2

:= .3

Re y L( )

= 0.284

)

1

lLt :=

lLt = 0.045

y L 2 l Lt = 1 0.443j

so we need an open circuited stub with a normalized suseptance of 3.638. This line has length

lLopen :=

1

2

( ( (

)))

atan Im yL 2 lLt

lLopen = 0.066

lLopen := lLopen + .5

lLopen = 0.434

The final amplifier circuit created in Serenade Design Suite is shown in Figure 7. This circuit only shows the RF

components; the amplifier will also require some bias circuitry. The return loss and gain were calculated using

Serenade Design Suite, using a .flp file for the transistor created from the S parameters given above. The contents of

the .flp file are:

FET11_4 3GHZ 5GHZ 3 50 1

*FET for Example

FET for Example 11.4 in Pozar

3GHZ 0.80 -90.0 2.8 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.66 -50.0

4GHZ 0.75 -120.0 2.5 80.0 0.0 0.0 0.60 -60.0

5GHZ 0.71 -140.0 2.3 60.0 0.0 0.0 0.58 -85.0

The results of the simulation are shown in Figure 8. The bandwidth over which the gain varies by + 1 dB or less is

about 25%, which is considerably better than the bandwidth of the maximum gain design of Example 11.3. The

return loss, however, is not very good, being only about 5 dB at the design frequency.

15

Figure 7. Serenade Design Suite schematic of the design of Example 11-4 [1].

Figure 8. Serenade Design Suite results of the design of Example 11-4 [1].

Low-Noise Amplifier Design

Besides stability and gain, another important design consideration for a microwave amplifier is its noise figure. In

receiver applications especially, it is often required to have a preamplifier with as low a noise figure as possible

since the first stage of a receiver front end has the dominant effect on the noise performance of the overall system.

16

Generally it is not possible to obtain both minimum noise figure and maximum gain for an amplifier, so some sort of

compromise must be made. This can be done by using constant gain circles and circles of constant noise figure to

select a usable trade-off between noise figure and gain.

The noise figure of a two-port amplifier can be expressed as

( 22)

F = Fmin +

RN

Y S Yopt

GS

YS = GS + jBS = source admittance presented to transistor.

Yopt = optimum source admittance that results in minimum noise figure.

Fmin = minimum noise figure of transistor, attained when YS = Yopt.

RN = equivalent noise resistance of transistor.

GS = real part of source admittance.

Instead of the admittance YS and Yopt, we can use the reflection coefficients S and opt, where

1 1 S

,

Z 0 1 + S

( 23a )

YS =

( 23b)

Yopt =

1 1 opt

.

Z 0 1 + opt

The quantities Fmin, opt and RN are characteristics of the particular transistor being used, and are called the noise

parameters of the device; they may be given by the manufacturer, or measured. We can manipulate these equations

to arrive at circles of constant noise figure with radii and centers given by

( 24a )

RF =

( 24b)

CF =

N N + 1 opt

opt

N +1

N +1

),

with

( 24c )

N =

F Fmin

2

1 + opt .

4RN / Z 0

We illustrate the design method by doing Example 11.5 in [1] with Mathcad.

Example 11.5 A GaAs FET is biased for minimum noise figure and has the following S parameters and noise

parameters at 4 GHz:

1.6

0.05 e

0.6 e

j 60 deg

S :=

j 26 deg

Fmin := 10

10

RN := 20 ohm

j 100 deg

opt := .62 e

Z0 := 50 ohm

Design an amplifier having a 2.0 dB noise figure with the maximum gain that is compatible with this noise figure.

(We have to convert 2.0 dB to an absolute value for Fmin.)

Solution

First we compute the unilateral figure of merit from equation 11.47.

17

U :=

S1 , 2 S2 , 1 S1 , 1 S2 , 2

1 ( S1, 1

) 2 1 (

dB := 1

) 2

S2 , 2

Errorupper := 20 log( 1 U)

Errorupper = 0.532 dB

Errorlower := 20 log( 1 + U)

Errorlower = 0.501 dB

Next, we use equations 11.59 and 11.61 to compute the center and radius of the 2 dB noise figure circle:

2

F := 10

CF :=

RF :=

10

( F Fmin) Z0

N :=

opt

4 RN

1 + opt

N N + 1

opt

) 2

N = 0.102

arg( CF) = 100 deg

CF = 0.563

N+1

)2

RF = 0.245

N+1

This data can be used to plot the noise figure circle on the Smith chart. As in previous examples, we need to

generate the Smith chart. The contours for a Smith chart are stored in the file smithc.prn. First read in this file

and set up the plot using the following commands:

X := READPRN( "smithc.prn")

k := 1 .. rows( X)

SR := X ORIGIN

SI := X ORIGIN+ 1

These instructions plot the first column of numbers in the .prn file on the horizontal axis against the second column

on the vertical axis, creating a simplified Smith chart, with the following gridlines:

Circles of constant resistance r for r = 0, .2, .5, 1, 2, and 5.

Contours of constant reactance x are at x = 0, .2, .5, 1, 2, 5, -.2, -.5,- 1, -2, and -5.

To plot the noise figure circle on the chart, plot the vector, CF + RF. The sequence of instructions below shows this

procedure.

f ( , ) := exp( j )

step := 0 , .01 .. 1

((

((

The noise figure circle is plotted in Figure 1. Minimum noise figure occurs for S = opt. We need to calculate data

for several input section constant gain circles. From equation 11.92,

2

gS S1 , 1

1 gS 1 ( S1 , 1 )

RS :=

CS :=

2

2

1 ( 1 gS) ( S1 , 1 )

1 ( 1 gS) ( S1 , 1 )

These values must also be plotted on Figure 1.

((

) )

imagCS ( step) := Im( f ( RS , 2 step) + CS)

18

gS .947

Circles of

constant

resistancefor r =

0, .2 .5, 1, 2,

and 5.

Contours of

constant

reactance forx

= 0, .2, .5, 1,

2, 5, -.2, -.5,1, -2, and -5.

Noise figure circle

Center, noise figure circle

Source stability circle

Center, source stability circle

Using trial and error for the value of gS and the zoom and crosshair features of Mathcad, we find that the

intersection of the gS circle and the noise figure circle is the desired value of S.

S := 0.141035 + j 0.522189

S = 0.541

( )

yielding

)2

( 1 S ) 2

1, 1 S

GS := 10 log

GS = 1.702 dB

GL := 10 log

1 ( S2 , 2

GL = 1.249 dB

G0 := 10 log( S2 , 1

) 2

G0 = 5.575 dB

GTU := GS + G0 + GL

GTU = 8.527 dB

19

To match the source, we first calculate the normalized admittance looking toward the input generator (the load in

this case) from the output of the source matching network. It is given by

1 S

Z0 := 50

yS :=

yS = 0.449 0.663j

1 + S

We must now move toward the load (the 50 internal impedance of the generator) to a point where the real part of

the normalized admittance on a 50 line is equal to 1.

yS ( ) :=

2j

1 S e

:= 1

2j

1 + S e

:= 0 ,

:= 1.5

Guess:

.. 2

20

( (

:= root Re yS ( ) 1 ,

= 1.417

Re y S ( )

lSt :=

lSt = 0.226

yS 2 lSt = 1 + 1.286j

so we need an open circuited stub with a normalized suseptance of 3.559. This line has length

lSopen :=

( ( (

atan Im yS 2 lSt

)))

lSopen = 0.145

:= S

B2 := 1 +

L :=

S2 , 2

)2 (

S1 , 1

B2 4 ( C2

2

B2

)2 (

C2 := S2 , 2 S1 , 1

)2

)2

yL :=

1 L

1 + L

( )

L = 0.457

2 C2

yL = 0.512 0.55j

We must now move toward the load to a point where the real part of the normalized admittance on a 50 line is

equal to 1.

yL( ) :=

2j

1 Le

2j

1 + Le

:= 1

:= 0 ,

20

20

.. 2

Guess:

:= 1.5

( (

:= root Re yL( ) 1 ,

Re y L( )

= 1.522

lLt :=

lLt = 0.242

y L 2 lLt

= 1 + 1.027j

so we need an open circuited stub with a normalized suseptance of 3.638. This line has length

:=

( ( (

)))

atan Im y L 2 lLt

lLopen = 0.127

2

A complete AC circuit schematic from Serenade Design Suite, using open-circuited shunt stubs in the matching

sections, is shown in Figure 9. The results of the analysis of the circuit are shown in Figure 10. The .flp file

follows:

lLopen

*FET for Example 11.5

FET for Example 11.4 in Pozar

3GHZ 0.6 -60.0 1.9 81.0 0.05 26.0 0.5 -60.0

4GHZ 0.6 -60.0 1.9 81.0 0.05 26.0 0.5 -60.0

5GHZ 0.6 -60.0 1.9 81.0 0.05 26.0 0.5 -60.0

NOI RN

4GHZ 1.6 0.62 100 0.4

Notice that we include noise data in this file and display noise figure in the results.

Figure 9. Schematic for the specified noise figure amplifier of Example 11.5 [1].

21

Figure 10. Results for the specified noise figure amplifier of Example 11.5 [1].

[1] David M. Pozar, Microwave Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1998.

[2] M. L. Edwards and J. H. Sinksy, "A New Criteria for Linear 2-Port Stability Using a Single Geometrically

Derived Parameter,: IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. MTT-40, pp. 2803-2811, December

1992.

22

- _S_PARAMETERSUploaded byctasaltin
- aptranscoUploaded bysuraj99
- Two Port Networks_uploadUploaded bykarthikhrajv
- 1150fbUploaded byanas
- Max Gain Amplifier DesignUploaded byRoberto Rubino
- An-878 Vhf Mos Power ApplicationsUploaded byEdward Yanez
- Music+pressureXperformanceUploaded byFifa Azlan
- Amplifier RSL SeriesUploaded bycyo kalel
- 5420 CRZUploaded byVenkatesh Subramanya
- Lab Write UpUploaded byBRAHMA AAKUMAIIA
- IN-DUploaded byMidhun Ash
- EE101 Operational AmplifierUploaded byAnish Puthuraya
- Sda 1002 MhzUploaded byFernando Aquino Berrios
- 5003_LowNoiseAmplifierUploaded byJohn Macho
- Slide HoriLabUploaded bydechelama06
- Trek 610e High Voltage Power AmplifierUploaded byKathleen Ramirez
- Tae 2453Uploaded byHer Rios
- TDA4866_5Uploaded byCarlos Alberto Faria
- QUES_5.pdfUploaded byVosuMittal
- Chap CouplerUploaded bynad_chadi8816
- u 4082bUploaded byhidromiel
- k47.tda2003Uploaded byvanton_dk
- DM1 315S6 75,0kWUploaded byJohnny Diaz Vargas
- TDA2003Uploaded byjakeyeto
- NATLS05780-1Uploaded byAleksandar Mateski
- ba6825fs.pdfUploaded byAldo Tonato
- Model 427 DatasheetUploaded byPratik Patel
- Pti1000 b Esd5100 SeriesUploaded bypj_chaudhary3796
- Large Signal Power Amp_intro_class A_PAUploaded bySathish Bala
- sboa072Uploaded byGalih Sukron Insani

- Solubility and Solubility ProductUploaded bySURESH
- Fatigue Life Calculation of WeldUploaded bySaut Maruli Tua Samosir
- Kinematics of CM 02 Deformation StrainUploaded byalihasan12
- 339268Uploaded bysherykhann
- AlgorithmsUploaded byAbbas Haider
- Ezy Math Tutoring - Year 11.pdfUploaded byVincents Genesius Evans
- Mining Health Care Data To Predict HospitalizationUploaded byLance Legel
- Statistics for Business and Economics: bab 21Uploaded bybalo
- Lumpy Demand ForecastingUploaded byHassan
- Trend AnalysisUploaded byAniket Kedare
- mppet2012Uploaded byTeja Chowdary
- CircleUploaded byAkshit Salecha
- Comparision of Python, MatLab and RUploaded bydjkpandian
- Ray OpticsUploaded byGoku Han
- Irs Internal 1 KeyUploaded bySobhan Dasari
- IJAEMS-Design, Modeling and Analysis of Structural Strength of Cylinder and Cylinder Head of 4-stroke (10 H.P.) C.I. Engine - A ReviewUploaded byInfogain publication
- Civil Service ReviewUploaded byAngelie Lape
- Vol2_No3_559-564_Comparing PID and Fuzzy Logic Control a Quarter-Car ...Uploaded byHussain Tenpin Diamond
- MTech Thermal EngineeringUploaded byswapnil
- DHP-DEC-2003Uploaded bySasiKumar Petchiappan
- Design of CountersUploaded byDeepak Svs
- Chapter8 Column DesignUploaded byKaren Lovedorial
- How to Solve Work Problems Part 1.docxUploaded bynew covenant church
- laUploaded byChris Moody
- ISE NEWUploaded byShu Yee
- Solid to solvent ratio.pdfUploaded byAmirah Sufian
- planning week 6Uploaded byapi-265696560
- 3.3.28Addingandsubtractingpolynomials3Uploaded byvictor
- CS403_1-22.pdfUploaded byUmber Ismail
- On the Synthesis of Polysyllogisms in Critical LogicUploaded byNoreen Lagmay