Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1 Introduction
Transportation of fluid materials can be done using
different supports for the pipeline. In their way, the
pipelines intersect with different obstacles. A pipeline
may cross these obstacles under or above them. Each
type of the crossing has its particular difficulties and
particularities for a good design. The waterway crossing
is an example that choosing the solution is influenced by
several considerations. Among them, one can refer to the
environment impact. The environment disturbance has
to be minimized since both aquatic and terrestrial plant
and animal life can be affected by the waterway
crossings. Both crossings, under and above water, have
to take care at the hazardous and contaminated materials
during construction [1]. The under water crossing is
more likely to affect the environment because of the
instability of the river bed and from here there is just a
small step to a catastrophic event. The above waterway
crossings permit good site inspections and most of the
loading can be easily determined. From this point it only
remains to decide which solution of the structure is
better to use: suspension crossing, cable-stayed crossing,
self-supporting or truss structure as a support for the
pipeline. The main factor that influences this decision is
the span of the crossing. For long span there are two
reasonable solutions: suspension crossing and cablestayed crossing. The last one has the advantage of
smaller anchors and possibility of building on soft soil,
but if the span increases the towers will have to increase
too much [2]. For these long spans the solution is to use
suspension crossings.
Suspension crossings have the following main parts:
towers, main cables (suspension cable), hangers,
ISSN: 1790-2769
234
ISBN: 978-960-474-180-9
Proceedings of the 3rd WSEAS Int. Conference on FINITE DIFFERENCES - FINITE ELEMENTS - FINITE VOLUMES - BOUNDARY ELEMENTS
2 Structural configuration
3.5
16.5
12.5
35.0
160.0
35.0
Element
E
[N/mm2]
M cable 1.5-2e5
L cable 1.5-2e5
Hangers 1.5-2e5
Windguy 1.5-2e5
Tower
2.1e5
Pipe
2.1e5
Table 1
A
T
Ix
Iy
[mm2] [mm4] [mm4] [mm4]
2827
0
0
0
2827
0
0
0
1194
0
0
0
1194
0
0
0
46.6e3 3.17e5 4.7e10 1.2e9
17.4e3 2.8e9 1.04e9 1.04e9
3 Conceptual design
Because during the erection of the crossing, there can
appear the wind action which can influence the stability
of the structure, an analysis was performed for two
situations: an intermediary phase when not all the
elements are connected and the final phase when the
entire structure is assembled.
ISSN: 1790-2769
235
ISBN: 978-960-474-180-9
Proceedings of the 3rd WSEAS Int. Conference on FINITE DIFFERENCES - FINITE ELEMENTS - FINITE VOLUMES - BOUNDARY ELEMENTS
E
[MPa]
1.5e5
1.6e5
1.7e5
1.8e5
1.9e5
2.0e5
4 Influencing factors
During several changes of considerations in the analysis,
it was observed that the modulus of elasticity influences
the behavior of the suspension crossing.
E
[MPa]
1.5e5
1.6e5
1.7e5
1.8e5
1.9e5
2.0e5
Mode 1
[s]
4.8003
4.8196
4.8209
4.9861
10.6128
11.0795
Mode 2
[s]
4.6589
4.6790
4.6798
4.8862
9.2572
9.7983
Mode 3
[s]
3.8833
4.0777
3.7529
3.8090
7.0128
9.3768
Table 2
Mode 4
[s]
2.9203
3.1632
2.9464
3.0037
5.1593
9.2662
ISSN: 1790-2769
Table 3
Mode 1 Mode 2 Mode 3 Mode 4
[s]
[s]
[s]
[s]
4.6567 4.5497 4.3230 3.5710
4.6567 4.5499 4.3209 3.5790
4.6717 4.5562 3.6910 3.0071
5.1747 5.0377 4.1368 3.4555
5.6080 5.5663 4.5213 3.7245
4.9204 4.8444 3.8222 3.1688
5 Conclusion
As can be seen above the finite element most used in
designing of these suspension crossings is the cable
element.
In choosing the properties of cable element, the
material characteristic, elasticity modulus shows a
certain influence on the behavior of the structure.
Although the maximum stress that appears in the
elements of the crossing, are not because of the usual
seismic action, it could rise the question whether the low
frequency earthquakes have a decisive effect on the
structure. (This isolated seismic action was studied
mostly in nearby Japan and the control period can range,
from 3 to 10s).
The pre-stress of cables, in the analysis, will affect
the behavior of the crossing. This is important for the
analysis since the temperature is also influencing the
stress in the cables. For a cold season the change of
236
ISBN: 978-960-474-180-9
Proceedings of the 3rd WSEAS Int. Conference on FINITE DIFFERENCES - FINITE ELEMENTS - FINITE VOLUMES - BOUNDARY ELEMENTS
References:
[1]X1. ASCE Manuals and Reports on Engineering
Practice, Pipeline Crossings, No.89, 1996.
[2]X2. Zhang Xin-jun, Sun Bing-nan, Aerodynamic
stability of cable-stayed-suspension hybrid bridges,
Journal of Zhejiang University Science, No. 6A(8),
2005, pp. 869-874
ISSN: 1790-2769
237
ISBN: 978-960-474-180-9