Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/
info/about/policies/terms.jsp
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content
in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship.
For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Duke University Press and New German Critique are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to New
German Critique.
http://www.jstor.org
This content downloaded from 146.50.98.28 on Mon, 26 Oct 2015 13:42:51 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
againstFundamentalism:
Enlightenment
The Exampleof Lessing*
by Agnes Heller
13
This content downloaded from 146.50.98.28 on Mon, 26 Oct 2015 13:42:51 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
14
Heller
Fundamentalismis flourishing
once again. Even its traditionalforms,
whichtheEnlightenment
thoughtto have banishedforeverfromtheworld,
now hold swayover a wide following,notonlyin theWest,butin theEast,
and in theThirdWorld as well. The fundamentalist
offensiveaffectsevery
human relationship.From the bedroom to the courtroom,fromour
education to our decisions between social and politicalalternatives,the
fundamentalists
wantto determine,regulateand controlall thosemeansby
which we findexpressionforour lives. There are otherswho do thisas
well: non-traditionalfundamentalists
who derive their"singulartruths,"
whethertheybe of nationalisticor idealisticnature,not fromthe god in
heaven but from false deities here on earth. However, anyone who
todayis notlikelyto respondto therecent
acknowledgestheEnlightenment
renunicationof the Enlightenmentwitha cruellymisanthropic
laughter,
the kind of laughterwhichfilledMinna von Barnhelmwithterror.For
misanthropyis in itselfactuallya way of renouncingthe Enlightenment.
Those who have remainedtrueto the Enlightenment
shouldlearninstead
to understandthe humanneeds whichfindexpression,even ifin distorted
form,in the modernfundamentalists.
Adorno and Horkheimerhave alreadytaken up thistask. However,a
oftheirtime,drovethemso faras to see the
justifieddespair,characteristic
blame for the renunciationof the Enlightenmentas lyingwithinthe
Enlightenmentitself.They did not take the second, even moreimportant
step of challengingthat traditionof the Enlightenmentwhich recommended an undistortedand non-fundamentalist
of the needs
fulfillment
which manifestthemselvesin fundamentalism.
In the shadow of Sade's
Justine,Emilia Galotti was forgotten.Not a singlewordin thiscritiqueof
the Enlightenmentrefersto thecase of Lessing.Lessingwas farfrombeing
This content downloaded from 146.50.98.28 on Mon, 26 Oct 2015 13:42:51 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
Enlightenment
againstFundamentalism 15
a guardian of instrumental
rationality.It was not trueknowledge,rather
the truth,or betterput, truthsin the plural, withwhichhe confronted
fundamentalism.Truthto Lessingwas the unityof the trueand the good.
The highestexpressionof truthis not constructing
an exact science, but
being able to make oneself amiable and pleasing to others. Lessing
considerstheonlygood argumentto be theone whichleads to good deeds,
which wants to accomplish good deeds. Moreover, goodness without
cleverness stands higherin his hierarchyof values than does cleverness
withoutgoodness. Only thefriarcompletelyrevealshimselfto Nathan.He
says, concerningthe decisive tragedyof his life,"I tell it onlyfrompious
of the "one ring,"he does
simplicity."And whenhe speaks of the tyranny
not onlymean by thatthe fundamentalism
of traditionalreligions.Lessing
knew, he had foreseen, that the Enlightenment,too, can lead to the
tyrannyof the "one ring."Even the Freemasonis not supposed to belong
to just one lodge. The defenseof Moliere's MisanthropeagainstRousseau
The inhumanity
of moralrigorwas
is also evidence of his farsightedness.
understoodby Lessingas a new kindof fundamentalism.
The Educationof
how
no
matter
its
Humankind,
verynaivelyprogressive conceptionmight
seem to be, does have its widsom. The work is not concerned with
denouncingthe old laws as emptynamesand merefanciesafterthemodel
of instrumentalrationality.The true idea of freedomis to free oneself
completely fromthe utilitarianrationalityfound in human relationseven in its subtle formas a beliefin personalimmortality,
a beliefwhich
the
of
and
in this
contains
means
ends.
remarks
always
Lessing
relationship
connection,"It will come, it definitelywill come - the time of completion, because humans,the moreconvincedtheyare in theirunderstanding
of an increasinglybetterfuture,at the same time willnot need to relyon
thisfutureas motivationfor theiractions,because humanswilldo whatis
good, because it is good..."
When Adorno and Horkheimermaintainthatthe Enlightenment
failed
to establish moralitybecause it failed to establishgeneral principles,it
must be added that this was not at all Lessing's intention.Quite the
contrary:these kindsof generalprinciplesagain would have meantforhim
the tyrannyof the one ring,the tyranny
whichhe so resolutelyopposed. If
truthis the unityof the trueand the good, thenit can be confirmedonly
retrospectively.In the event that the truthis acknowledgedas being
amiable and pleasant, then today one cannot formulatecommonlyvalid
principlesof morality.There are a varietyof persuasions,and all of them
have theirown particularlyappropriateprinciples.One can be good in a
varietyof ways, whichmeans attainingthe good; but one shouldbe good,
even ifin different
ways. There is a moralprincipleconcealed herewhich,
in defianceof pluralism,could be describedas theregulativeidea of truth.
Though we do not knowwhattruthis, we can nevertheless- makinguse
- stillbe in the truth.
now of Hegel's formulation
We can accomplishthisin variousways. We can be in the truthon the
This content downloaded from 146.50.98.28 on Mon, 26 Oct 2015 13:42:51 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
16
Heller
This content downloaded from 146.50.98.28 on Mon, 26 Oct 2015 13:42:51 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
Enlightenment
againstFundamentalism 17
of the humanmind,
only in the usual sense of all great accomplishments
but also in a more specificsense. To quote Conversations
for Freemasons
once again, Falk characterizesFreemasonrywiththese words: "For it is
not based on externalrelations,whichso easilydeteriorateintobourgeois
minds." One
proscriptions,ratheron the mutualfeelingof sympathizing
even could say thatthe bourgeoisproscriptions
mentionedabove playonly
a verysuperficialrole in mostofLessing'sworks.Of course,thissuperficial
role also has a specificfunction,and I will returnto it later.
However, the aforementionedbourgeois determinantsdo not at all
define the qualityof humanrelations.Those who are evil and thosewho
are good confronteach otheras evil people and good people, as "naked
souls," and not as representativesof theirgroups. In thissense, and of
course only in thissense, Lessing is veryclose to Dostoevsky.The sudden
catharsisof the tyrantat the end of Emilia Galottican be understoodonly
from this viewpoint,as long as one does not wish to ascribe a naive
optimismto Lessing, which we have absolutelyno reason to do. One
certainlycannotimaginea RichardIII, a Macbeth or even a King Philipp
suddenlyacknowledgingGood at a drama'send. Alienatedpoliticalpower
is totallyincapable of makingsuch a gesture.Still,in lightof the death of
innocence, the prince behaves not like a prince, rather like a guilty
person - like Raskolnikov. With Lessing, the humanbeing is not at all
determinedbythe level ofpoweror class. Powerhas no logic.Thereis only
one logic: thatof humanrelationships.For thisreasonpeople can deplete
power as faras theyare able, in orderto supportand preservetheGood in
theirhuman relationships.
Power existsonly insofaras it is capable of cripplinghumanrelations.
The depletionofpower
This itcan do onlywhenitis somehowinternalized.
is the process throughwhichpeople freethemselvesof such internalization. All threeof Lessing's greatestdramasvarythisbasicallystoic idea,
althoughalways in a modernizedfashion.However,in thefinalvariation,
Nathan the Wise, Lessing succeeds in overcomingseclusion,in whichthe
old stoic notion is perpetuallyconcealed. Emilia Galottiand Minna von
Barnhelmportraythetragicand non-tragic
possibilitiesforthedepletionof
time.
in
as
existed
Nonetheless,the outcome of
Lessing's
they
power
Nathan is a philosophicalutopia. Power is depletedwithinthe institutions
humanized:That is whythe
of bourgeoissociety,and it is simultaneously
in
form
a
tale.
the
of
is
conceived
fairy
story
Today, no less thanin Lessing'stime,thereariseboundarysituationsin
whichone can deplete poweronlyby means of voluntarydeath. Suicide is
the extremevariantof seclusion.However, ifthe onlyotheralternativeis
the internalizationof tyrannicalpower, the complete loss of one's own
personality,the renunciationof moral obligations,preciselythiskindof
escape is the onlychoice worthyof humanity.Emilia Galottishowsherself
to be a genuine and profoundthinkerwhenshe designatesthe essence of
power with these words: "Violence! Violence! Who cannot oppose vio-
This content downloaded from 146.50.98.28 on Mon, 26 Oct 2015 13:42:51 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
18
Heller
This content downloaded from 146.50.98.28 on Mon, 26 Oct 2015 13:42:51 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
Enlightenment
againstFundamentalism
19
This content downloaded from 146.50.98.28 on Mon, 26 Oct 2015 13:42:51 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
20
Heller
This content downloaded from 146.50.98.28 on Mon, 26 Oct 2015 13:42:51 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
Enlightenment
againstFundamentalism 21
themselveswith their roles in the political discourse. The Aristotelian
distinctionbetween the good citizenand the good person appears here
once again. The latterimpliestheformer,butis also somethingmore.That
is whyI have said thattheconceptof depletionofpowerin thephilosophical utopia of Nathan the Wise is raised in a Hegelian sense: it is negated,
but also preservedon a higherlevel. Discourse and religioare combined
once again.
This content downloaded from 146.50.98.28 on Mon, 26 Oct 2015 13:42:51 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
22
Heller
This content downloaded from 146.50.98.28 on Mon, 26 Oct 2015 13:42:51 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
Enlightenment
againstFundamentalism
23
I have alreadymentionedLessing'sconceptoffriendship
as a symbolof
of
which
exist
sublime
human
beyondall
relationships
relationshps,
purely
determinants.
and
contains
is
chosen
nothing
bourgeois
Friendship freely
could stillbe considereda symbolof
organic. But forthisreason friendship
because, as we have seen, Lessingintendedthese
bourgeois determinants,
determinantsto be freelychosen, or newlychosen ones. In the bourgeois
sphere, however, the normof equalityshould be the valid one, because
timeand timeagain, bourgeoisrelationships
give riseto inequality.EqualBut friendship
is a relaof
reflection.
are
determinants
and
ity
inequality
It
is
a similar
determinants
of
reflection.
above
these
which
stands
tionship
situationwithlove, whichcontainsfriendship.
Tellheim'swords,"Equality
and
is always the most enduringbond of love," are repeated irritatingly
love
and
but
is
a
Minna.
determinant,
quantitative
Equality
derisivelyby
is
the
are
not
categoryof
friendship
quantifiableobligations.Equality
business contacts,but in friendshipthereare no businesscontacts;there
is only giving.One mightbe amazed at the importantrole whichwealth,
material goods and moneyplay in Lessing's dramas. Only by thismeans
could the non-essentialnature of wealth, propertyand money within
friendshipbe made clear. "We have, whenour friendhas," saysWerner.
When Nathan findsa friendin Saladin, he gives him more than Saladin
once had wanted to forciblytake fromNathan. In friendshipand in
love between friendsthereis no "mine" and "yours." That whichseparates people in the bourgeois world unites them in friendship.Friendship is no less a reciprocalrelationshipthan is a contract.But it is the
highest formof reciprocity.It is the reciprocityof the essential. Marx
expresses the same thoughtin his earlywritings.In Economic and Philosophic Manuscriptshe writes,"Once you assume thathuman beingsare
human beingsand thattheirrelationshipto theworldis a humanone, then
you can exchangelove onlyforlove, trustonlyfortrust,etc." And I hardly
thinkI am goingtoo farwithmyspeculationwhenI recognizethethemeof
The Education of Humankindin the followingsentencefromMarx: "The
entiretyof historyis thehistoryof thepreparationand developmentof the
human being intoan object of materialawareness,and of theawarenessof
the 'human being as humanbeing' intoa necessity."Of course the young
This content downloaded from 146.50.98.28 on Mon, 26 Oct 2015 13:42:51 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
24
Heller
This content downloaded from 146.50.98.28 on Mon, 26 Oct 2015 13:42:51 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
Enlightenment
againstFundamentalism
25
This content downloaded from 146.50.98.28 on Mon, 26 Oct 2015 13:42:51 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
26
Heller
TELOS
a quarterly
journal of radical thought
Issue47: Spring1981
SpecialIssueon Polandand theFutureofSocialism
ARATO: CivilSocietyvs.theState
BAUMAN : On theMaturationofSocialism
CARLO: Afghanistan,
Polandand Ddtente
MICHNIK : Hopesand Realities
POMIAN : MiracleinPoland
MAZOWIECKI: Solidarity's
Task
WOJCICKI: TheReconstruction
ofSociety
DAMUS: StrikeCyclesin Poland
Issue48: Summer1981
FEKETE: On Interpretation
RADNOTI: Mass Culture
SILARD: On theHistoryofthe Workers'
Councils
WELLMER: Terrorism
and Social Criticism
HIRSCH : The NewLeviathanand theStruggle
forDemocraticRights
GORZ: Nine Thesesfora FutureLeft
GONZALES : Rethinking
Radical Politics
Please enter my subscription to Telos (4 issues per year), beginning with issue number
1 year: $18;
2 years: $36
(outside U.S. add 10%; U.S. funds only)
Name
Address
State
City
Zip
Country
Send with check or money order to 7elos, P.O. Box 3111, St. Louis, Mo. 63130
This content downloaded from 146.50.98.28 on Mon, 26 Oct 2015 13:42:51 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions