Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ch. Daublebsky
von Eichhain
HRSG
RR
Titel HRSG_2.indd 5
PP PUBLICO Publications
29.07.15 13:26
POWER PLANTS
HEATING SYSTEMS
COOLING SYSTEMS
WASTE
WATER
ABWASSER
Titel HRSG_2.indd 4
h2o facilities sa
8 av. Grandes Communes
CH -1213 Petit Lancy | Switzerland
Tel.: +41 22 879 95 00
Fax: +41 22 879 95 09
info @h2o-f.ch
www.fineamin.com
29.07.15 13:26
U4 Heat
06.02.2003
17:39 Uhr
Seite 2
PP PUBLICO Publications
Witteringstr. 10 + D 45130 Essen/Germany
Tel.: ++49(0)201/79 12 12
Fax: ++49(0)201/79 88 278
e-mail: pp-publico@online.de
www.pp-publico.de
II
HRSG
PP PUBLICO Publications,
Witteringstr. 10, D - 45130 Essen/ Germany
Phone: +49(0)201/79 12 12
e-mail: pp-publico@online.de
www.pp-publico.de
ISBN:
3-934736-32-7
ISBN-13: 978-3-934-736-32-0
EAN:
978 3 934 736 320
Cover photos:
KED, D-Mnchen
Annotation of the publisher:
the quality of figures and tables generally depends on the material made available from the
authors. Place of jurisdiction for all matters concerning this book is Essen/Germany.
I
III
HRSG
Heat Recovery
Steam Generators
PP PUBLICO Publications
IV
Compact
Heat Exchangers
Content:
I. Foreword
II. Apparatus Designs
II.1 Plate Heat Exchangers
II.2 Plate & Shell Heat Exchangers
II.3 Spiral Heat Exchangers
II.4 Block Heat Exchangers
II.5 Microstructure Heat Exchanger
III. Plate structurization
IV. Material Technology
IV.1 Copper
IV.2 Tantalum
IV.3 Graphite
IV.4 Ceramics
IV.6 Plastics
V. Surface Technology
VI. Preventive Measures for Mitigation of
Fouling
VI.1 Inspection
VI.2 Filtration/Mirco Filtration
VI.3 Chemical Conditioning
VI.4 Cleaning and Reconditioning
VII. Applications
PP PUBLICO Publications
www.pp-publico.de
Content
1. Introduction
1.1.
Abstract
1.1.1.
Design
1.1.2.
Operation
1.2.
Overview
1.2.1.
Gas turbine cycle
1.2.2.
Rankine- Cycle
1.2.3.
Steam turbine
1.2.4.
Heat Recovery Steam Boiler
1.2.5.
Combined Cycle II
1.2.6.
Market of Heat Recovery Steam Generator
1.2.7.
History
1.3.
Conversion of heat to electrical power
1.3.1.
Thermal efficiency
1.3.2.
Electrical efficiency
1
2
2
2
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
10
11
11
13
2. Design of a HRSG
2.1.
Over all design of a HRSG
2.1.1.
Pressure levels
2.1.2.
Drum type boiler vs. once through boiler
2.1.3.
Pinch Point method
2.2.
How to design a boiler
2.2.1.
Design of the duct
2.2.2.
Tube diameter, fin dimensions and tube pitches
2.2.3.
Scaling of fins
2.2.4.
Corrosion
2.2.5.
Fouling
2.2.6.
Fin efficiency and fin material
2.2.7.
Pipe wall thickness
2.2.8.
Header wall thickness
2.2.9.
Drum wall thickness
2.2.10.
Gas Side Pressure Drop
2.2.11.
Pressure drop on water side
2.2.12.
Natural circulation
2.2.13.
Forced through circulation
2.2.14.
Fin tube heat transfer
2.2.15.
Pipe turbulent heat transfer
2.2.16.
Pipe evaporation heat transfer
2.2.17.
Heat conductivity of steel
2.2.18.
Overall heat transfer
2.2.19.
Logarithmic mean temperature
2.2.20.
Designing of heating surfaces
2.2.21.
Noise and vibration problems at heat exchanger
2.2.22.
Regenerative feed water preheating vs. condensate preheating
2.2.23.
General Remarks
2.2.24.
Duct burner
15
16
16
19
19
24
24
24
26
26
28
32
34
35
35
35
36
37
38
38
38
38
38
39
39
40
40
43
44
46
VI
Content
2.2.25.
2.2.26.
2.2.27.
2.2.28.
2.2.29.
48
48
48
49
50
51
52
52
52
53
53
54
54
54
54
55
56
57
57
58
59
62
62
63
63
63
64
64
64
66
66
66
66
67
68
68
69
70
71
72
72
72
73
76
77
VII
Content:
1. Introduction
2. Heat Exchangers for Fouling Duties
2.1 Constructional Disposion
2.2 Conditioning Disposion
3.
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
4.
4.1
4.2
4.3
5. Fouling Monitoring
PP PUBLIC
O Publica
Witterings
tion
tr. 10 + D
45130 E s
e-mail: pp
ssen
-publico@
online.de
www.p
p-publico
.de
Editor:
Ch. Daublebsky
von Eichhain
HRSG
Titel HRSG_2.indd 1
PP PUBLICO Publications
16.07.15 10:53
1. Introduction
1. Introduction
13.07.15 11:50
1. Introduction
1. INTRODUCTION
1.
Introduction
1.1. Abstract
This book is about the design and operating of a Heat Recovery Steam Generator
(HRSG)
1.1.1. Design
1.1.2. Operation
Start up with purging, drain, considering the temperature gradients of drum and
headers
Start the duct burners
Load change
1.2. Overview
Combined Cycle
The combined cycle is the combination between a gas turbine thermodynamic
cycle (Brayton- Cycle) and a steam cycle (Rankine- Cycle). The Brayton Cycle has high
source temperature and rejects heat at a temperature that is conveniently used as the
energy source for the Rankine Cycle. The most commonly used working fluids for combined cycles are air and steam. Other working fluids (organic fluids, potassium vapour,
mercury vapour, and others) have been applied on a limited scale.
13.07.15 11:50
1. Introduction
1 - 2 : Isentropic Compression
2 - 3 : Reversible Constant Pressure Heat Addition
3 - 4 : Isentropic Expansion
4 - 1 : Reversible Constant Pressure Heat Rejection (Exhaust and Intake in the open cycle)
13.07.15 11:50
1. Introduction
Fig. 3:
Enthalpy Entropy (h-s) diagram
of a gas turbine cycle
Fig. 4: Flow diagram and Temperature Entropy (T-s) diagram of a Rankine Cycle
1-
2-
3-
4-
5-
13.07.15 11:50
1. Introduction
6- 1 Condensor
13.07.15 11:50
1. Introduction
Fig. 6:
Steam Turbine
Fig. 7: Cross
section of a
modern triple
pressure HRSG
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
13.07.15 11:50
1. Introduction
Fig. 8: Flow diagram and Temperature- Entropy (T-s) Diagram of a combined cycle
13.07.15 11:50
1. Introduction
1.2.6.2.
13.07.15 11:50
1. Introduction
1.2.6.3.
Market CCPP
The market for Combined Cycle Power Plants (CCPP) has experienced rapid growth in
the last years. This growth has been driven by different reasons:
Deregulation in the U.S. and Europe.
Low prizes
Fast to build up (in some cases the gas turbine is installed very quickly and the
HRSG is installed later)
Rather low fuel cost of natural gas
Less problem with environmental requirements
Very good cycling behaviour
Due to this, e.g. independent power producers (IPP) rose and have induced both, a
growth in new power production and a shift from coal and solid-fuel-fired conventional
steam plants to gas turbine (GT) plants and CCPP leading to economically interesting
returns of investment (ROI).
In the U.S. alone, while gas turbine and combined cycle plants represent only 10% of
the existing base of 860 GW, they currently provide well over 90% of all new capacity
[Got1].
In Europe the markets seem to hesitate. Until now deregulation has taken place in some
countries only, e.g. the U.K., but is on the way for the rest of the EU.
13.07.15 11:50
10
1. Introduction
Expectations in Europe are rather for a consistent growth, than a boost like that in the
U.S., which is unlikely, due to the fact that governmental responsibilities for sufficient
and reliable power generation in the past led to capacities above the actual needs. Even
though these plants, mostly fossil fired, need replacement in the coming one or two
decades. In addition coal fired plants, in several European countries, serve great public
economic benefits as a result of large own resources. Same applies to hydro power, e.g.
Norway, Austria and Switzerland. Nevertheless growth expected in Europe selecting
France, Germany, Spain, Sweden, UK and Finland as an average number, is 70 GW
for new capacity until 2005 [FTE1]
The deregulation-driven growth is expected to fall off in North America, while at the
same time, combined cycle power plants will support continued HRSG growth in the
recovering Asia market. Another key driver is the aggressive technical development of
large frame combustion turbines (170 to 250 MW, even 370 MW in a test stage) targeted for the utility power generation market. Over the last decade, large combustion
turbines have been developed with higher efficiency and dramatically improved emissions profiles. More efficient water/steam cycles have been developed to take advantage of higher exhaust temperatures from advanced combustion turbines installed in
combined cycles. Capital costs of gas fired combined cycle are about 40% of coal fired
steam plants [Got1]. Gas price and availability support a life cycle cost advantage in
many regions of North America and Europe. The net efficiency of the combined cycle
power plant (up to 60% expected in the near future, at the time being 58% for high end
CCPPs) is much higher than with conventional steam plants (typically 35% to 40%,
up to 50% for high end plants). Combined cycle plants also continue to offer improvements in permitting and Installation time thereby reducing the capital cost and risk to
plant developers. Combined cycle plants are able to provide lowest levels of NOX and
CO emissions per kWh of electricity produced, especially if low NOX burners and SCR,
CO catalysts are considered.
This all results in a necessary development in HRSG technology, as well as a new understanding of the HRSG supplier delivering a less priced, though key component of a
plant gaining more and more shares in power generation and economic success of the
owner.
1.2.7. History
To efficiently mate the Rankine steam cycle with high-temperature gas turbines, new
HRSGs had to be developed that could operate at substantially higher flue- gas temperatures. New HRSG designs also were required to match each incremental jump in gasturbine size as combined cycle units grew larger and larger. Perhaps the most important
development in HRSG design was the move from single- to dual- pressure steam production. This change, which enabled lower stack temperatures and thus greater recovery of thermal energy from the gas-turbine ex-haust, increased thermal efficiency of a
combined-cycle plant by nearly four percentage points. Later designs went one step
13.07.15 11:50
1. Introduction
11
further, from dual- to triple-pressure steam production, and yielded approximately one
more percentage point gain for the overall cycle. Today, virtually all HRSG manufacturers offer triple pressure reheat steam systems to maximize efficiency [Swa1].
Fig. 11:
Sankey energy
diagram of a HRSG
13.07.15 11:50
12
1. Introduction
1.3.1.1.
= Useful_heat
Input_heat
1.3.1.2.
= 1 Heat_Losses
Input_heat
Because of
Axel-Turbine_Blade
rev Turbine
13.07.15 11:50
1. Introduction
13
In a nozzle the hot steam with high pressure will be expanded and accelerated to the
velocity v Steam_in (turbine Inlet).
In the turbine the steam will be decelerated to v Steam_out and the turbine produces the
mechanical power out of the velocity differences.
Enthalpy and velocity has a close connection:
2
2
h in h out = v out v in
2
2
The mechanical power of the turbine is converted in the generator in electrical energy.
The efficiency of converting mechanical power in elec-trical power in a generator is
rather high (about 98%). But even if the losses are rather low, the generators must be
cooled (a 1000 MW gen-erator has losses of about 20 MW!) by hydrogen or water. In
some cases the generator is cooled by air.
el = electrical_Power
Input_heat
13.07.15 11:50
14
1. Introduction
13.07.15 11:50
2. Design of a HRSG
15
2. Design of a HRSG
16.07.15 10:51
16
2. Design of a HRSG
2. Design of a HRSG
2.1. Over all design of a HRSG
2.1.1. Pressure levels
Why to make different pressure levels ?
The steam turbine works with high velocities (about 985ft/s [300 m/s]). The steam turbine takes the energy of the steam, so if the steam transferred too much energy, the
steam starts to condense to water. Thus the local stress (= compressive stress = pressure) on a turbine blade increases dramatically and may destroy it.
The stress is:
F
m (in out )
V (in out )
in A (in out )
lokal = =
=
=
A
A
A
A
16.07.15 10:51
2. Design of a HRSG
17
Fig. 13: Temperature Transferred Heat (T-Q) Diagram triple pressure diagram
Fig. 14: Temperature Transferred Heat (T-Q) Diagram dual pressure diagram
16.07.15 10:51
18
2. Design of a HRSG
16.07.15 10:51
2. Design of a HRSG
2.1.2.
19
[Fran1]
2.1.3.
2.1.3.1.
Pinch Point
The pinch point is defined as the difference between the gas temperature exiting the
last evaporator section and the saturation temperature in that drum. That means with a
lower pinch point more steam is produced at that pressure stage.
16.07.15 10:51
20
2.1.3.2.
2. Design of a HRSG
Approach Point
The approach point is defined as the temperature difference between saturation temperature in the drum and economizer outlet temperature. If the approach point is decreased, less steam must be condensed to preheat the economizer outlet water to
saturated temperature.
The pinch point and the approach point have a big influence to the steam flow, if it is assumed that the other parameter are fixed e.g. gas turbine flue gas flow and temperature,
superheater steam temperature and pressure, feed water temperature etc.
To decrease the pinch point it is normally necessary to increase the transferred heating
power. That means often to increase the heating surface or the gas side pressure drop.
So there is a search for the optimum with higher efficiency and lower costs.
After the decision how many pressure stages there should be, the pressures of each
pressure stages can be determined:
First of all: The temperature of the HP Steam an RH Steam must be defined. Some
small gas turbines dont produce flue gas with high temperatures (lower than 930 F
[500C]), so the HP Steam temperature is determined as flue gas temperature minus
ca. 18 F [10C] (There must be always a temperature difference to transfer heating power. The lower the temperature difference the bigger must be the heating surface area) If
the gas turbine produces higher temperatures the superheating temperature is a question of the pressure and tube material. The higher the temperature the lower should be
the pressure and the more expensive is the material.
The key components, whose performance is critical, are high-pressure steam piping,
headers, and super heater tubing. All these components have to meet creep strength
requirements, but thermal fatigue resistance and weldability are important, too. Ferriticmartensitic steels are preferred because of their lower coefficient of thermal expansion
and higher thermal conductivity compared to austenitic steels.
16.07.15 10:51
2. Design of a HRSG
21
Among the 9% Cr steels fully commercialised, the P91 steel has the highest allowable stress and has been extensively used all over the world as a material for headers, steam pipes and superheater tubes operating at steam temperatures up to 1103 F
[595C] - nominal, 1139F [615C] as a maximum for HRSG applications according to
the German TRD Code or up to 1202F [650C] tube metal temperature according to
ASME. The steel P-92, developed by substituting part of the Mo in P-91 by W, has even
higher allowable stress values and can be operated up to steam temperatures of 1175F
[635C]. P-92 is already approved by the ASME boiler code, but no approval according
to the German rules is available for the time being. Further developments are E-911,
which is already approved in Germany (material number 1.4905) and P122, which was
developed in Japan and has been approved by ASME. The allowable creep strength of
these new steels at 1112 F [600C] is about 25% higher than that of P-91 [Vis1]. As an
example for application, a super heater made of E-911 and steam loops made of E-911
and P-92 are operating at steam temperatures of 1202 F [650C] in the conventional
fired power station of RWE in Germany. Therefore it must be remarked that the limiting factor for efficiency increasing high steam temperatures is the high end steam turbine, which is commercially available for steam temperatures at a maximum of 1049 F
[565C], only [Nes1].
With the material of the superheaters, reheaters and headers respectively the live steam
a reheat steam temperature is fixed.
The condensate pressure should also be known (e.g. an air cooled condenser has an
higher pressure than an sea cooled or river cooled condenser (ca. 0.75 PSI [0,05171
bar]))
Then there must be the maximum water content in steam (ca. 5% - 10% mass fraction
water in the steam (= 95% - 90% steam content)) defined and the efficiency of the turbine (The data is normally received of the turbine manufactory).
So the end- point of the graph in the h- s (enthalpy entropy) can be determinate (see
end point 1 in picture). In a computer calculation the enthalpy (h) and entropy (s) of
steam water mix is a function of the pressure and water content h(p,x) s (p,x).
Then determinate the enthalpy differences between this point and the point with the
same entropy and the superheating or reheating temperature respectively. Divide the
enthalpy difference with the efficiency of the turbine and search for points with the same
entropy with the condenser pressure, the SH or RH temperature and the enthalpy difference (see example). So the start point for expansion is fixed too.
16.07.15 10:51
22
2. Design of a HRSG
16.07.15 10:51
2. Design of a HRSG
23
16.07.15 10:51
24
2. Design of a HRSG
The first dimension of the duct must be guessed and during an iterative calculation
adapted. With the length of the duct the fine tuning of gas side pressure drop and the
heating surface area can be made very easy, e.g. 10% length of the duct means 10%
more heating surface and 17% decrease of pressure drop.
2.2.2.
It must be decided which outer diameter and fin height should be used.
The geometry effect is the apparent anomaly in heat transfer surface between various
vendors for the same performance. As an example, a vendor with 2.0" [51mm]OD tubes
may propose 25 % more surface than the competitor who uses 1.5" [38mm] OD tube.
This does not mean that the lower surface is the result of high technology heat transfer
equipment design. This happens simply because of the nature of heat transfer itself.
Lower diameter tubes give the same amount of heat absorption with less surface. Similar anomalies exist for other geometry parameters such as fin type, fin geometry, tube
length etc. For this reason it is not prudent to eliminate designs which may have too
much or too little surfaces.
16.07.15 10:51
2. Design of a HRSG
25
Transversal pitch is recommended, cause higher pressure drop but higher heat transfer,
lower number of rows in flue gas flow direction necessary.
Typical values are
Parameter
Traditional
value
What is used
today
2.0 [50.8]
Solid
5 [200]
Inline
3 6 [76-152]
0.75 [19.1]
1.25 [31.8]
Serrated
0,1 8 [10-315]
staggered
2.5 [63]
1.00 [25.4]
Out of the outer diameter and fin height the transversal and longitudinal tube spacing
can be calculated. It is recommended to have distances between fin tips of about 0.5
inch 0.25 inch [12.7mm 6.4mm].
The fin density can be chosen between 0.5 fins/in [20 fins / m] and 7.5 fins/in [300 fins
/ m] [Br1] depended on the needed heat transfer, maximum flue gas velocities and
pressure drop.
There are different methods to manufacture the finings on the tubes. A very dearly
(close) mounting with a continuous welding (very seldom soldering) is recommended.
There should be no spot welding. During the whole live there shouldnt be any mechanical or pitting corrosion dismantling. If there is only a tiny gap between fins and tube, the
fins dont transfer any heat and can start scaling.
16.07.15 10:51
26
2. Design of a HRSG
The fin tips has a much higher temperature than the pipe wall. So there is a danger of
scaling of fins. The fin tip temperature can be calculated by hand or computer program.
2.2.4.
Corrosion
Potential problem areas as a result of load cycling or on-off cycling include: gas turbine
exhaust dew point corrosion, corrosion fatigue, and consequences of not maintaining
proper steam cycle chemistry (i.e., on-line, off-line storage and return to service). Corrosion and fatigue damage are cumulative and can not be reversed. Using HRSG initially designed for base load operation in cycling operation defines the need to carefully
evaluate several occurrences with regard to HRSGs. Special attention has to be paid to
three of them at least:
2.2.4.1.
2.2.4.2.
Since cycling means temperature and pressure gradients from ambient to operational
level and air ingress during longer outages, stress corrosion fatigue as a result of these
influences will occur. A proper chemistry regime, i.e. maintaining low dissolved oxygen,
pH within the required range and proper feed water quality (VGB, O2 < 0,1 mg/kg), is a
must. From the HRSG operating side, the boiler should be kept under pressure as long
as possible, e.g. no forced cooling and closing of the stack damper to prevent rapid
natural draft cooling.
First, the HRSG designer has to consider flow velocities lower than the known limits to
dissolve protective Magnetite layers in water and/or lines carrying two phases, water
16.07.15 10:51
2. Design of a HRSG
27
and steam. Second, the chemistry regime has to be maintained in a way that the Oxygen content is not too low to prevent a proper magnetite layer from forming - erosion
corrosion is increasing - and on the other hand not too high to accelerate Stress Corrosion Fatigue. In Europe this has been taken into account by the increased maximum O2
content (VGB, TRD, etc.) for boiler feed water (from 0,02 mg/kg to 0,1 mg/kg for pH >
9). Best choose is not to fall below 0,05 mg/kg (VGB minimum for pH neutral feed water) considering the above.
2.2.4.3.
Cold end corrosion is a well known phenomenon. It can be prevented by increasing the
water inlet temperature, e.g. condensate recirculation, above the dew point of the flue
gases. Cycling leads to a situation at each start up, when the inlet temperature can not
be properly increased - deposits on the cold end of the HRSG surfaces are the consequence. This results in decrease of thermal efficiency and increase of draft losses at the
long term, fin and tube corrosion, if the deposits are moistened - by air humidity or washing. To prevent or limit the effect of cold end corrosion during cycling Operation, regular
inspections and cleaning of the boiler surfaces is recommended. This is usually done
by air blasting (little deposits), dry ice blasting (up to 6 layers affected) and washing with
large amounts of low pressure water (entire surfaces). The water washing is the most
effective, although special considerations have to be made and actions set to prevent
corrosion of the casing (horizontal type HRSG) or poisoning a catalyst (vertical type
HRSG). Start up after performing water washing is recommended to prevent corrosion
of other HRSG parts. The ultimate solution to cold end corrosion is the use of corrosion
resistant materials - the only reliable and lasting but expensive solution.
16.07.15 10:51
28
2. Design of a HRSG
Dew point of sulphuric acid as a function of partial pressure of sulphuric trioxide and
water vapour
T_S = (A B ln ( p H2O) C ln ( p H2SO4 ) + D ln ( p H2SO4) ln ( p H2O))-1
A = 2.988 10-3 K-1
B = 5.97 10-5 K-1
C = 1.161 10-4 K-1
D = 6.2 10-6 K-1
P H2O = x H2O p
P H2SO4 = x H2SO4 p
[Ver1]
Unfortunately the sulphuric trioxide content in flue gas is not known. Normally it is assumed that the converting rate form SO2 to SO3 is up to 5% [Gan2] [Ras1] but other
articles say, it can be up to 50% [Wic1].
2.2.5.
Fouling
Fuel
Dry Air
Natural Gas
Propane
Butane
No. 2 Fuel Oil
No. 6 Fuel Oil
Crude Oil
Residual Oil
Coal
Wood Wastes
0.000 - 0.001[0.000-0.176]
0.001 - 0.003[0.176-0.528]
0.001 - 0.003[0.176-0.528]
0.001 - 0.003[0.176-0.528]
0.002 - 0.004[0.352-0.704]
0.003 - 0.007[0.528-1.233]
0.008 - 0.015[1.409-2.642]
0.010 - 0.030[1.761-5.283]
0.010 - 0.050[1.761-8.805]
0.010 - 0.050[1.761-8.805]
0.05 [1.27]
0.07 [1.78]
0.07 [1.78]
0.07 [1.78]
0.12 [3.05]
0.18 [4.57]
0.20 [5.08]
0.20 [5.08]
0.34 [8.64]
0.34 [8.64]
16.07.15 10:51
2. Design of a HRSG
29
Fouling resistance
Fouling resistance in heat transfer from gaseous combustion products to finned heat
transfer surfaces(Wei[1])
Fuel
Natural gas
Propane
Butane
Clean turbine gas
Moderately clean turbine
gas
Light fuel oil
Diesel
Heavy fuel oil
Crude oil
Coal
Fouling resistance
hr ft F/Btu [mK/kW]
0.0005-0.003 [0.09-0.53]
0.001-0.003 [0.18-0.53]
0.001-0.003 [0.18-0.53]
0.001 [0.18]
0.0015-0.003 [0.27-0.5]
0.002-0.004 [0.36-0.7]
0.003 [0.53]
0.003-0.007 [0.53-1.24]
0.004-0.015 [0.7-2.7]
0.005-0.050 [0.89-8.85]
82 98 [25 30]
59 79 [18 24]
49 69 [15 21]
16.07.15 10:51
30
2. Design of a HRSG
Iron Copper
ppm
ppm
0.100 0.050
0.050 0.025
0.030 0.020
0.025 0.020
0.020 0.015
0.020 0.015
0.010 0.010
0.010 0.010
SiO2
ppm
150
90
40
30
20
8
2
1
Hardness Alkalinity
ppm CaCO3
0.300
700
0.300
600
0.200
500
0.200
400
0.100
300
0.050
200
0.000
0
0.000
0
Conductivity
1/( in)[S/cm]
1.78 [0.7]
1.52 [0.6]
1.27 [0.5]
1.02 [0.4]
0.76 [0.3]
0.51 [0.2]
0.038 [0.015]
0.025 [0.01]
16.07.15 10:51
2. Design of a HRSG
31
Natural-circulation
boilers
General demands
Oxygen
PH at 20C
SiO2
Hardness3
Total iron
Copper
Total CO2
Conductivity
Permanganate
Oil
n.n.
< 0.03
< 0.005
<1
<5
< 0.5
b. Boiler water
bar
20
40
Pressure5
p-Value6
ppm < 500
< 300
SiO2
ppm < 70 + 7 p < 30 + 3p
7
Phosphates ppm < 25
< 10
Conductivity S/cm < 8000
< 5000
Density
Bc < 0.4
< 0.25
65
80
125
< 150
< 50
< 15
< 10
< 4
< 1.2
< 10
< 3
< 3
< 2500 < 1500 < 250
160
<5
< 0.4
<3
< 50
16.07.15 10:51
32
2. Design of a HRSG
Fig. 25: Rise in temperature of heated surfaces in evaporators due to depositions of Fe2O3
The rise in temperature of an evaporator wall that results from magnetite (Fe3O4) scale
on the heated surfaces was measured by MacBeth [Mac1], [Mac2], [Mac3] and results
are shown in fig. 25.
Since the heat fluxes transferred in conventional steam generators do not significantly
exceed 317,000. Btu/(hr ft) [1000 kW/m], rises in temperature higher than 18 F [10 K]
ought to occur. MacBeth also reported [Mac1] that magnetite deposits reduce the critical
heat flux by 5% - 10% and increased the frictional pressure drop by as much as 50%.
tf
l f - fin height
[ft (m)]
t f - fin thickness
[ft (m)]
b=lf +
16.07.15 10:51
2. Design of a HRSG
m=
2ho ( t f + w s )
kftf ws
X = tanh (mb)
mb
E = X(0,9 + 0,1X)
33
Obviously, the coefficient of thermal conduction greatly influences the heat transfer efficiency and changing to austenitic steel grades should be considered very carefully.
A very efficient way to increase the heating surface is to increase the number of fins
per meter. Until today, because of fabrication and technical constraints, the maximum
number of fins for a fin thickness of 0.039 in [1 mm] was limited to approx. 88 fins/ft [290
fins/m] .
16.07.15 10:51
34
2. Design of a HRSG
2.2.7.
See ASME UG 27
16.07.15 10:51
2. Design of a HRSG
35
d
2
tP =
SE1 0.6P
P
2.2.8.
2.2.9.
[kW]
[mbar]
[m/s]
p
V
Example
1,080,898. [ft/min]
15.781
[inch of Water]
70%
[-]
P loss = 1,401. kW
[in of Water]
[ft/min]
GT volume flow
HRSG pressure Drop
efficiency of GT
Gas side pressure drop has a role in determining the surface area but its significance
is limited. Previously it was normal to have at least 0.5 decrease in efficiency of gas
turbine for every inch of gas side pressure drop in the HRSG. Todays advanced gas
turbines have reduced this by about 25%. The Optimum design seems to be between
10- 14 inwc [25-35 mbar], depending of the numbers of pressure stages and the kind
of boiler. Lower pressure drops increase the area requirements rapidly but at higher allowable pressure drops the area decrease is not very large. The gas velocity changes
with the square root of the pressure drop. Hence high pressure drop results in moderate
velocity and heat transfer increase, because the heat transfer is a bit lower than linear
with the velocity. Consequently, the surface area reductions are small. So the reason
16.07.15 10:51
36
2. Design of a HRSG
for keeping the pressure drop in the 10-14 inwc [25 - 35 mbar] region is that this velocity
region is the most economical. On the other hand, very high pressure drop would lead to
higher gas velocities, which may be detrimental to the integrity of the outside surfaces.
2.2.11.
The pressure drop on the water side should be not too low because of bad mass flow
distribution. For example, if the final superheater has a too low pressure drop, it is possible, that due to an small additional resistance in one single pipe (e.g. sharp edge in a
hole of the header because of not complete drilling) there is too low steam flow in that
pipe, so the pipe is not cooled enough and could cause damages. If the pressure drop
in the pipes is high enough, the influence of an additional resistance is not as big. Another reason is, that high pressure drop means higher heat transfer coefficient in the
pipe. Inside heat transfer has much bigger influence to the overall heat transfer at heating surfaces with fined tubes than heating surfaces with bare tubes.
Also there should be not too high pressure drops on the water / steam side: Too high
velocities can cause damages:
Erosions corrosion
Flow accelerated corrosion (FAC)
Some hints for velocities:
HP Superheated steam velocities
Unit
ft/s
[m/s]
Value
230
[70]
Reason
Sound,
economics
ft/s
[m/s]
66
[20]
Erosion
Corrosion,
ft/s
[m/s]
33
[10]
FAC, EC,
economics
Water Velocities
ft/s
[m/s]
6-13
[2-4]
FAC, EC,
economics
Like for the pressure drop on the flue gas side, the pressure drop of the water side must
be compensated from the feed water pump. This also causes directly loss of electrical
power:
Example:
357,149. lb/hr [162. t/hr]
100 PSI [6.89 bar]pressure drop pumped by the feed water pump
219 F [104C]
70% efficiency
need 46 kW electrical power.
16.07.15 10:51
2. Design of a HRSG
37
The higher the pressure drop in the superheater, the higher is the pressure in the drum
and the lower is the steam flow.
An other reason not to have too high pressure drops is, that the drum pressure would
increase too much and that would mean higher wall thickness lower cycling gradients;
The friction pressure drop in natural circulation system must be very low to have a higher natural circulation ratio.
2.2.12.
Natural circulation
The natural circulation works with the difference of density of the water in the downcomer and the water steam mixture in the evaporators and risers.
The pressure difference is the same as the pressure drop of friction and acceleration.
The natural circulation calculation must fulfil two conditions:
Pressure at outlet of riser must be the same as at the inlet of downcomer.
At each junction must be the same pressure
So the natural circulation calculation is a pressure drop calculation and a mass flow distribution calculation.
The friction of the two phase flow in the evaporator and risers is much higher than the
friction of the water in the downcomers.
The natural circulation ratio (NCR) is defined:
NCR = 1 / mass steam content in riser
Or more simply:
NCR = Mass flow downcomer / steam mass flow out of the drum
The NCR should be bigger than 5 !
The velocity in the downcomer (one phase flow) should not be bigger than
13.1 ft/s [4m/s] lower than 8 ft/s is recommended.
The velocity in the evaporator and riser should not be bigger than 32.8 ft/s [10m/s].
In some cases (mostly with horizontal evaporator pipes) it is recommended to install a
siphon at the downcomer, so the natural circulation cant start in the wrong direction
at the start up. The wrong side start up can be happen because at the first steam bubble production the steam water mixture is pressed in both directions: to the risers and
to the downcomers if there are too much steam bubbles in the downcomer, the downcomer can become a riser and the circulation goes in the wrong direction, at increasing
load the direction of circulation can change, that can cause very high drum water level
changes. In this case it can happen that the drum water level goes over the maximum
or under the minimum, that triggers a boiler trip.
16.07.15 10:51
38
2.2.13.
2. Design of a HRSG
A modern HRSG has normally no forced through circulation. There are three advantages of having none:
Saving invest cost because the circulation pump is rather expensive. The pump
must run with the rather high evaporation temperature, the feed water pump runs
with a much lower water temperature.
Saving electrical power for running the pump.
Decreasing of the reliability of the boiler because most designs of the circulation
system is so, that it doesnt run without the circulation pump, if the circulation pump
is damaged, the boiler must trip.
2.2.14.
2.2.15.
2.2.16.
2.2.17.
There are different heat transfer methods for finned tubes. The methods according
[Kri1] and [Esc1] are recommended.
The formulas according Gnielinski are recommended [VDI1] chapter Gb.
The formulas according VDI Heat Atlas [VDI1] chapter H.
Temp F
32 68 212 392 572 752 932 1112 1292 1472 1652 1832
ASTM DIN ca.
CS St 35.8
32.9 32.9 32.9 31.2 28.9 26.0 24.3 21.4 21.4 21.4 21.4 21.4
T9
15 Mo 3
29.5 29.5 29.5 28.3 26.0 24.3 22.5 20.8 20.8 20.8 20.8 20.8
T11 13 CrMo 4 4
26.6 26.6 26.6 26.6 24.8 23.7 22.0 20.8 20.8 20.8 20.8 20.8
T22 10 CrMo 9 10
20.2 20.2 21.4 22.0 22.0 21.4 20.2 19.1 19.1 19.1 19.1 19.1
T91 X 10 CrMoVNb 9 1 15.0 15.0 15.6 16.2 16.2 16.8 17.3 17.3 17.3 17.3 17.3 17.3
T304 X 5 CrNi 18 10
8.7 8.7 9.2 10.4 11.0 12.1 12.7 13.9 14.4 15.0 16.2 16.8
T321 X 6 CrNiTi 18 10
8.7 8.7 9.2 10.4 11.6 12.1 12.7 13.9 14.4 15.6 16.2 16.8
T309 1.4833
7.2 7.3 8.1 9.0 10.0 10.9 11.8 12.8 13.7 14.7 15.6 16.5
T310 1.4841
7.2 7.3 8.1 9.0 10.0 10.9 11.8 12.8 13.7 14.7 15.6 16.5
T409 10 CrMo 9 10
13.9 14.0 14.3 14.8 15.3 15.7 16.2 16.6 17.0 17.5 18.0 18.4
Tab. 9: heat conductivity of steel Btu / hr ft F
16.07.15 10:51
2. Design of a HRSG
39
Temp C
0 20 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800
ASTM DIN ca.
CS St 35.8
57 57 57
54
50
45
42
37
37
37
T9
15 Mo 3
51 51 51
49
45
42
39
36
36
36
T11 13 CrMo 4 4
46 46 46
46
43
41
38
36
36
36
T22 10 CrMo 9 10
35 35 37
38
38
37
35
33
33
33
T91 X 10 CrMoVNb 9 1 26 26 27
28
28
29
30
30
30
30
T304 X 5 CrNi 18 10
15 15 16
18
19
21
22
24
25
26
T321 X 6 CrNiTi 18 10
15 15 16
18
20
21
22
24
25
27
T309 1.4833
12.4 12.7 14 15.6 17.3 18.9 20.5 22.1 23.7 25.4
T310 1.4841
12.4 12.7 14 15.6 17.3 18.9 20.5 22.1 23.7 25.4
T409 10 CrMo 9 10
24.1 24.2 24.8 25.6 26.4 27.2 28.0 28.7 29.5 30.3
Tab. 10: heat conductivity of steel W / m K
2.2.18.
h=
S
1
Ao
1
+ R fo + W +
R fi +
h
Ai
hi
2.2.19.
v1O = v1i
(v1i v2i )
1
NTU2
1
+
NTU
NTU
1
NTU1 (1 e
2)
NTU1
1e
tlog Crossflow =
(v1i v1o )
NTU2
m cp
OutH2O = inH2O +
Q
Outlet flue gas temperature
mFG cpFG
OutFG = inFG
Q
16.07.15 10:51
40
2. Design of a HRSG
2.2.20.
The purpose is clear: transfer of heat from one medium to another. In most cases, the
medium flow is continuous so that we will consider this particular case only.
The actual heat transfer can be obtained by the following equation :
Q
= h A tlog
To change the heat transfer capacity, following variations in heating surface geometry
are available:
1. Length of the tubes (a function of duct height)
2. Number of pipes in flue gas direction
3. Number of tubes in transversal direction (is a function of the duct width and
transversal spacing)
4. Tube diameter and tube wall thickness (is a function of stress calculation)
5. Fin height
6. Fin pitch
7. Fin thickness
8. Velocity of the gas medium (is a function of item 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7)
9. Velocity of the medium in the tube (is a function of item 3, 4 and how many rows
carrying flows)
10. Changing the difference in temperature
To meet the requirements, these days computer simulations are used and the different
possibilities in a ranges are tried out.
Outlet H2O temperature
m cp
OutH2O = inH2O +
Q
Outlet flue gas temperature
m cpFG
OutFG = inFG FG
Q
2.2.21.
At serrated fins it may happen, that due to a rather high flue gas velocity a high-pitched
whistle can occurs, that can increase to a threshold noise of pain.
The velocities in the graph is the velocity before the bundle. This velocity was much
easier to obtain in the test facility
16.07.15 10:51
2. Design of a HRSG
41
Also tube bundles in cross flow are often subject to vibration and noise problems. Vibration can lead to wear and consequent tube failures. Noise problems can be a nuisance
to operating personnel.
Fig. 29:
Amplitude as a function
of the fluid velocity
Flue gas flows over a tube bundle in inline or staggered arrangement, vortices are
formed and shed beyond the wake of the tubes, resulting in harmonically varying forces
perpendicular to the flow direction. It is a self excited vibration and the frequency of vibration is called vortex shedding frequency. If the frequency of vibration of the von Krman vortices, as they are called, coincide with the natural frequency of vibration of the
tubes, resonance occurs leading to bundle vibration.
16.07.15 10:51
42
2. Design of a HRSG
Fig. 30:
Vortexes after
a tube
a-
b-
Another phenomenon that occurs with vortex shedding is acoustic vibration, leading
to noise and high gas pressure drop. Standing waves are formed inside the duct. The
acoustic pressure fluctuations are a maximum where the fluid motion is zero; hence the
walls of the enclosure are subject to pressure pulsations and may distort outwardly. The
duct or the bundle enclosure vibrates when the vortex shedding frequency coincides
with the acoustic frequency.
There are five rules to reduce the danger of noise and vibration:
Not too high velocities of flue gas between the pipes
Install support sheets in vertical HRSG or support (pipe fixing) construction in
horizontal HRSG (to double the (eigen-) frequency)
Install the support sheets or support construction not symmetrically to have different
(eigen-) frequencies of one pipe
To have possibilities to install acoustic baffles to eliminate noise concerns. When a
baffle is inserted in the tube bank, reducing the width by half or a third etc.
Here again, not a symmetric of the baffles.
Vary the fin density of the tube rows a bit to alter the frequency
16.07.15 10:51
2. Design of a HRSG
43
There are some possibilities to calculate the vibration for bare tube bundles [Gan1],
but for finned tubes bundle there are existing very few papers with different sources
[Chen1].
2.2.22.
At a big direct fired boiler the regenerative feed water preheating increases the efficiency of the power plant significantly. Despite of taking steam of the turbine for preheating,
the effect is, that the most transferred heat from the steam of the turbine to the feed water would be condensate in the condenser. So the heating power for feed water preheating can be saved and has not to be taken from the flue gas. The flue gas can be used for
air preheating. This is the reason for the increasing of the efficiency. A thermodynamic
explanation would be, that the average input heating power temperature is increasing.
At a combined cycle process this is not the case, because there doesnt exist an air
preheater, so if the flue gas would be not used for feed water preheating, the flue gas
heating power would be lost through the stack. Therefore decrease of the steam flow
through the turbine due to the steam extraction at the turbine would only decrease the
performance of the turbine instead of increasing the live steam flow.
16.07.15 10:51
44
2.2.23.
2. Design of a HRSG
General Remarks
Typically, for large GT CCPP the clients and HRSG manufacturers request for the following:
Triple Pressure Single Reheat HRSGs - the present existing economic optimum
High pressure (HP) level - the existing economic optimum is 1885.5 psi [130 bar],
although the thermal optimum lies well above (2610.6 [180 bar] [Eis1]) for triple pres sure reheat HRSG.
Steam Temperatures - economic optimum, defined by the steam turbine, is 1049 F
[565C].
Steam Output - defined by the economic determination of the Pinch Point (10.8 to
14.4 F[6 to 8 K]) at the HP Evaporator and the Approach Point at the Economiser
(3.6 to 7.2 F[2 to 4 K]), typically 163 lb/s [74 kg/s] without supplementary firing (SF).
265 lb/s [120 kg/s] using SF.
Feed water/Condensate Inlet temperature with respect to the type of fuel used,
above 122 F [50C] for natural gas, at no sulphur content, and above 230 F [110C]
for light distillate oil to ensure Operation above the acid or the water dew point.
Stack temperature minimum 176 F [80C]
Steam Purity - entering the Super Heater at 99,9%, especially important if the client
requests for solid alkalisation in addition to the all volatile treatment (AVT), being
state of the art for HRSG design in Europe.
HRSG flue gas draft losses - approx. 0.36 psi [25 mbar], 0.51 psi [35 mbar] if cata lysts are required.
The spray cooler never should spray so much water, that the steam purity goes
under 100% (i.e. saturated steam) because the water droplets in the steam will be
separated in the next heater. Some pipes can get thermo shocks. Be careful at some
supplementary firing cases. Sothere must be a right location of spray cooler
HRSG manufacturers also offer a choice between a horizontal or vertical fluegas path.
Vertical designs - which have originally been developed in Europe where the major suppliers of this kind still are located - offer a smaller footprint and are less vulnerable to
thermal cycling problems than the horizontal designs commonly applied and originated
in North America. Since the vertical HRSG no longer require forced-circulation pumps,
not even for Start ups, due to design improvements of the evaporator systems both
HRSG types offer the Same overall efficiency, although the decision may be directed to
one type of HRSG:
16.07.15 10:51
2. Design of a HRSG
Horizontal HRSG
Output and Efficiency
Equal
Surface Area for equal Output Similar, except the reheater and
superheater Section, which might
require slightly more heating surface
area mainly due to less advantageous
flue gas flow distribution with regard to
temperatures and mass flow
Purging
Worse to purge because unburned light
hydro carbons could not be purged out
as consequence of maldistribution of air
due to high opening angle of inlet duct
and low air velocoity
Plot Plan Area for equal Output Up to 30% more, mainly due to the
opening angle of the inlet duct and the
stack. Also if supplementary firing systems,
SCRs, CO Catalysts, etc. are required
Emisson control
Requires more HRSG length
Supplementary Firing
Readily installed in the HRSG inlet
duct or within the boiler surface area
HRSG enclosure / boiler house Free Standing, self supporting
enclosure
Natural Circulation
State of the art
Modularized/Standard concepts Better modularising possible
Support sheets
No tube support sheets needed
Erection Area, prefabrication
Equal, though more crane area is
on site
required for pressure part (harps)
mounting which typically lasts 5 weeks
for large GT CCPP
Cycling
State of the art design experiences
severe cycling problems at superheater
and reheater stages, design considera-
tions cost effective
HRSG cost
Equal
(ready to run)
O&M cost
Higher number of and larger textile
expansion joints, boiler surface replace-
ments not possible, repair by blocking
of tubes, cost effective
45
Vertical HRSG
Equal
Base
Base
Base
16.07.15 10:51
46
2. Design of a HRSG
2.2.24.
Duct burner
In the case that the electrical power output should be increased or if there is a need for
an occasional power peak, supplementary fuel is fired in the HRSG by utilizing the duct
burners. Normally the heat input through the burner is fully recovered in the HRSG. But
in addition, more heat from the gas turbine exhaust gas will also be recovered. So the
net effect of firing is to make the HRSG more efficient than the unfired case. This is the
reason for the apparent burner efficiency of greater than 100% or more heat extraction
than the amount put in through the burner. For example if 107,85 MW of heat (fuel LHV)
is input through the burner the steam turbine output should increase by about 34,1 MW
(31,66% efficiency). The steam turbine power increase is about 52,0 MW. The extra
17,9 MW are obtained from the gas turbine exhaust because under fired operation, the
stack temperature decreases causing more heat recovery.
16.07.15 10:51
2. Design of a HRSG
47
Fig. 34:
T-Q diagram
with duct burner
in operation
This increase may not be possible if there is an LP boiler operating at a very low steam
pressure at the tail end. For example, if the gas turbine input is increased by about 8%,
the steam turbine power would also go up by the same percentage. If the same amount
of fuel is burned in the HRSG via a duct burner, the ST power will increase by about
9,5%, from the gas turbine exhaust has been recovered over the unfired operation. The
fired Operation generally can be classified in three distinct groups:
1. HRSGs designed for fired Operation only
2. HRSGs designed for occasional firing for peak loads and
3. HRSGs designed for fired and unfired Operation equally.
Of these the first two are relatively easy to design because they will be designed for one
conditions only. The continuous fired Operation boiler, because of higher temperatures,
needs more consideration in the selection of metallurgy to withstand higher temperatures. Today it is feasible to design to a firing temperature of about 1500 F [820 C] with
convection sections only. Higher temperatures up to 2000 F [1100 C] can be designed
with a waterwall furnace section [Pas1].
An unfired HRSG is also more easy because design temperatures may not be very high
and can be accommodated with normal materials with normal thicknesses. It should be
noted that todays advanced gas turbines have about 1200 F [650 C] at the gas turbine
exhaust with a superheat steam temperature of 1055 F [570 C]. Care is needed in material selections.
16.07.15 10:51
48
2. Design of a HRSG
When the HRSG needs to be designed for both fired and unfired operation, the design
becomes difficult. Because of the wide range of operating condition, the steam flows in
fired case may be three times that of the unfired case. The HRSG needs to be designed
with particular attention to the critical areas. Critical areas consist of attemperator sizing,
superheater and reheater velocities, drum internals, non-steaming economizer design,
valve sizing and circulation connections. Detailed specifications of all operating conditions is necessary for a dual, fired and unfired design as they have a significant impact
on the design and operation of the HRSG. Interstage firing, double or triple attemperators, bypassing of the part or full economizer, dual valves are some of the means employed to optimize the fired and unfired designs.
There are some cases where the HRSG is designed to have the same capacity with out
the gas turbine exhaust flow. This is done by providing a fan and burner System to duplicate the gas turbine exhaust conditions. Since it will be very costly to reproduce the
100% gas turbine flow and temperature, the Fresh Air fired units are designed to operate at reduced capacity. In any event this alternative is a very costly one and should be
used only when it is very critical to have uninterrupted steam flow and when other alternatives outside the HRSG are not available.
2.2.25.
The flue gas ductwork uses an internally insulated, cold casing design. In this design a
combination of ceramic fibre and mineral wool insulation is sandwiched between a durable alloy or carbon steel internal liner and external casing. HRSGs designed for high
rates of supplemental firing may have firing temperatures which are unsuitable for use
with alloy internal liners. In these cases a special rigidised ceramic fibre liner is employed [Pas1].
2.2.26.
Environmental considerations
2.2.27.
Site conditions
The site conditions have a influence to the gas turbine performance and also the HRSG
output is affected. In cold areas the gas turbines and HRSG produce more power when
compared with the units operating in hot environments. Conversely at higher altitudes,
the capacities are reduced, because at higher altitudes the HRSG pressure drop will be
higher for the same amount of gas flow. This reduces the overall capacity.
16.07.15 10:51
2. Design of a HRSG
49
For example a HRSG in Mexico City 7,350. feet [2240 meter] over see level would have
about 33% more volume flow due to the reduced pressure at this altitude.
Environment air born chemicals also have an effect an HRSG performance. HRSG near
oceans or chemical factories may experience higher level of chlorine. In such places,
series 300 stainless steel for feedwater heaters can not be used due to the corrosive
effects of chlorine. For these cases the design is either made low efficient by exhausting at a higher stack temperature or stainless steel is replaced by other higher order
material.
2.2.28.
Steaming in economizers
16.07.15 10:51
50
2.2.28.1.
2. Design of a HRSG
2.2.29.
Important notes
Reduces bypasses of flue gas at the heating surfaces with baffles etc.
Fired HRSGs are in most cases more efficient than unfired units
Higher the fin density and surface respectively, lower the overall heat transfer coefficient.
With a lower the tube side heat transfer coefficient, there should be a smaller external fin surface area
HRSG can be optimised using HRSG simulation methods
Water temperature affects economizer tube wall temperature much more than
the gas temperature and hence for corrosion prevention consider raising water
temperature
Fouling inside tubes is more serious in finned tube surfaces than in bare tube surfaces
Surface areas should not be the basis for selecting HRSGs
Understand the difference in efficiency based on higher and lower heating values
16.07.15 10:51
51
13.07.15 11:54
52
Fig. 37: Gas turbine mass flow time diagram during start up
13.07.15 11:54
53
Fig. 39: High pressure steam mass flow- time diagram during start up
Fig. 40: High pressure steam pressure- time diagram during start up
13.07.15 11:54
54
3.1.5. Gradients
Fig. 41:
High pressure
temperature and
pressure gradient- time diagram
during start up
3.2. Start up
Start-up and shutdown operations have little impact to units designed for base load operations. For units with cyclic operation, number of start-ups and shutdowns, the condition of the HRSG at start-up, the nature of shutdown, all influence the life of the boiler
and hence need to be taken into consideration while designing the HRSG. Generally
thicker components such as HP drum are considered for life time studies. If the HRSG is
exposed to extreme conditions and the frequency of changes is high, dynamic analysis
and life time study is necessary for the HRSG.
It is very important to take care and attention for a complete deaeration of the economizers. If there are too big air bubbles after filling the economizers with water the performance of the economizers can be very low.
3.2.2. Purging
The Purging required as a precondition to start the GT through the boiler, is a common
requirement of all boiler codes to ensure safety operation of the plant.
Germany:
TRD 411 and TRD 412 [TRD1].
Europe: EN 12952
UK : British Gas
USA : NFPA 8506, NFPA 8606
This rules are historically evolved, since in the beginning of boiler Operation severe accidents occurred. Today purging a hot HRSG strains all involved boiler parts to a high
extent, special considerations and design features have to be taken into account (see
above) to cope with the requirement of daily start ups for a lifetime of 25 years.
13.07.15 11:54
55
The stratification of air flow in horizontal boilers during prestart purge of the HRSG also
suggests that the purge is not accomplishing its intended purpose--to remove combustible gases from the HRSG before turbine ignition. Because natural gas and most volatiles released from distillate fuel oil are lighter than air, it is particularly important for the
purge to flush out any combustibles that have accumulated in the dead spaces at the
top of the duct.
The industry needs
a thorough review
of the purpose of
HRSG purging and
of the circumstances in which there
is risk of ignition of
combustibles in the
upper duct. So it is
recommended to increase the transition
angles of the inlet
duct of a horizontal
boiler.
3.3.
Drain
Condensation
occurs in superheater
tubes during every
purge of the HRSG
at warm or hot start
prior
to
gasturbine ignition. This
is because turbine
exhaustgas temperature falls below saturation temperature.
Quantities of condensate are substantial during hot and
warm starts. A repeat
purge can actually fill
the front panel tubes
of the superheater.
1. Extensive temperature
monitoring confirmed that a
substantial quantity of condensate
formed in superheater tubes
during gasturbine purging,
even in large-bore headers
13.07.15 11:54
56
Condensate should be removed from lower headers at the peak rate at which it forms
to prevent pooling and flooding. But this requires adequately sized and correctly operated drains elements that have been overlooked at many large combined-cycle installations. Many units have no blowdown vessel for high-pressure/temperature drains from
the superheater. Others have a blowdown vessel inadequately rated for flow, pressure,
and temperature of drains from the superheater during hot restart purges. The drain
installed an most superheater designs was sized for maintenance purposes and is too
small for clearing condensate at the rate it collects. In [Eis2] it is reported how to estimate the drain water flow and taking the right nozzles.
Even where superheater drains are installed and connected to a blowdown tank, no
guidance has been given by HRSG manufacturers or EPC contractors as to when and
how they are to be used. Not surprisingly, they often are incorrectly used or not used at
all during hot starts.
To remove condensate from lower headers of vertically tubed HRSGs, the lower headers must have adequate bore in relation to their length and number of attached tubes to
ensure that tubes cannot flood [Pea1].
Fig. 43:
Drainage arrangement
Before start up it is recommended to decrease the drum water level, because at the first
evaporation there will be water displaced by steam in the evaporators, causing a water
swell in the drum. So a lower drum water level can prevent a too fast increasing over
the high water level mark, that trigger a boiler trip.
The drum water level before start up can be controlled by the blow down valve.
13.07.15 11:54
3.5.
57
Also it is recommended to run water through the economizers before and during start
up. The water comes out through the blow down valve. The point of it is to have lower
and constant temperature and to pour steam and air bubbles out of the economizer. If
for example there are too much steam bubbles in the economizer, then it can happens
that a fast increasing pressure can cause the collapsing of the bubbles and then the
feed water has to fill first the eco and in worse case the eco sucks water out of the
drum. For that reason it is recommended that the connection of the eco to the drum is
above the drum water level.
3.6.
13.07.15 11:54
58
The design should be in this way to minimize fatigue damage. These features include
full penetration welds throughout the design to eliminate crack initiation points and utilization of the highest grade material practical to reduce pressure vessel wall thickness.
The mechanical design details of tube offsets, tube harps, and supports/hangers should
be arranged to minimize the stresses caused due to thermal expansion.
An examination of the fatigue life based upon ASME Section VIII Div 2 (Europe EN
12952- 3 and Germany also TRD 301 Appendix I possible) criteria should be done and
in some cases finite element stress analysis. The objective of this analysis is to provide
the impact of combustion turbine start-up scenarios and to provide parametric curves
showing the life cycle life for different ramp rates and temperature differentials [Bri1].
13.07.15 11:54
59
Most horizontal HRSGs use multiple row harp designs, consisting of one horizontal upper header and one horizontal lower header joined by two, three or more rows of vertical
tubes. The temperature of exhaust gas passing across multiple tube rows is succes-
13.07.15 11:54
60
ively reduced so that individual tube rows may operate at different temperatures, leading to differential thermal stress at the weld joints. These stresses can be reduced by
having only one row of tubes between the headers. This allows the use of smaller diameter headers according ASME UG 27 (Wall thickness proportionally to the diameter)
and also minimises circumferential temperature gradients in the headers. Small diameter headers reduce thermal stresses by as much as 60 per cent when compared with
headers having multiple tube rows.
One comparative simulation for hot start has examined the effects of a thermal quench
during shutdown and provides an example of the benefits of the smaller header with a
single row of tubes over a bigger header with two tubes. In the simulated thermal quench,
condensate forms in the tube, the
tube cools to saturation temperature (545 F [285 C]) while the
bottom of the header remains at
nominal steam temperature (800
F [427 C]). A simulation shows
that the predicted number of cycles to crack initiation are 18,272.
for the header with a single tube
and 6,156. for the header with two
tubes, which experiences much
higher stresses than the smaller
header [fig. 49].
13.07.15 11:54
61
Use of finned tubes without bends and radial penetration of the header are also beneficial as they minimise stresses in the tube-to-header welds. Up flow and down flow in
the same harp should also be avoided, so headers need to be designed without division
walls to avoid unacceptable temperature differentials in tubes adjacent to the division
wall, which may occur particularly during transients [Als1].
Fig. 51: Drum shell stress during start up with different stress in steam and water section
13.07.15 11:54
62
13.07.15 11:54
63
Steam drum level control is necessary to add makeup water as steam is delivered into
the header and to the associated process equipment. The system should control the
drum level at a specific set point while compensating for varying steam demands and
drum pressures. For a given volume of steam and blowdown leaving the steam drum,
an equal amount of water should replace that inventory. Discussions here include the
primary sensing devices and the various strategies used to control steam drum level
and feedwater rate.
The drum level is measured using a differential pressure transmitter. Refer to the drawing on the right. The output of the instrument increases as the differential pressure decreases. A typical range is 30 inches of water column. A condensing reservoir is installed
to allow the high side of the D/P to measure the steam pressure plus the hydraulic pressure in the reference leg. The low pressure side senses the boiler drum pressure, the
weight of the water above the low pressure tap and the weight of a column of saturated
steam from the high pressure tap to the water level. Being a differential pressure device,
the boiler drum pressure is cancelled out of the measurement, leaving only the water
column pressure difference. The level measurement is accurate only at a single drum
pressure. If needed, a pressure measurement can compensate for varying drum pressures by applying a gain and bias to the drum level signal.
Under steady-state conditions, both water and steam bubbles reside below the water
surface. The average mixture density is constant. Should steam demand increase, the
steam bubbles expand under the water surface, increasing the average mixture density.
This causes an increase in steam drum level without the addition of feed water. This
increase in level proportional to an increased steaming rate and decreased drum pressure is called swell. Inversely, as the steam load decreases, the steam bubbles in the
steam/water mixture decrease in size and volume. This causes a decrease in drum level, although the mass of water and steam has not changed. This phenomenon is called
shrink. These apparent changes in drum level can be compensated for by implementing
a pressure transmitter and drum pressure correction factors as a part of the feed water
control strategy.
13.07.15 11:54
64
3.10.4.
A single element control strategy uses the drum level signal as the process variable. After performing a P+I computation on the level deviation from set point, the output of the
controller is sent to the feed water flow control valve. This configuration is used on small
boilers with a relatively large water volume and steady loads.
In addition to the drum level measurement, a two element design uses a steam flow
transmitter as a feed forward input to the feed water controller. This feed forward plus
feedback configuration allows the controller to anticipate a need for additional feed water flow before this is sensed as a lowered drum level. The steam flow signal is characterized for gain and applied to a summer modifying the level controller output. The
diagram shows the two element configuration with an optional drum pressure input. This
design is typically used on small to medium boilers with moderate changes in steam
demand. The effects of shrinking and swelling are minimized in this design. However, a
disadvantage is the lack of compensation for varying feed water pressure. This problem
is common in multiboiler installations with a common feed water system. These pressure variations change the material balance between steam flow and feed water flow.
If variable feed water pressure is a problem, a three element control configuration can
correct the difficulty.
3.10.6.
Three element control
Fig. 55:
Three element drum water level control scheme
13.07.15 11:54
65
Liquid
Steam or Gas
mm
inch
15 - 25
1/2 - 1
40 - 50
1 1/2 - 2
65 - 100
2 1/2 - 4
150 - 200
6 - 8
250 - 400
10 - 16
Angle Valves Size
mm
inch
15 - 25
1/2 - 1
40 - 50
1 1/2 - 2
65 - 100
2 1/2 - 4
150 - 200
6 - 8
250 - 400
10 - 16
m/s
ft/s
9
30
7.5
25
6
20
6
20
4.5
15
Liquid
m/s
ft/s
13.5
45
12
40
10.5
35
9
30
7.5
25
m/s
ft/s
120
400
90
300
75
250
70
225
55
175
Steam or Gas
m/s
ft/s
135
450
105
350
90
300
85
275
70
225
13.07.15 11:54
66
3.10.7.
3.10.8.
Pressure control
3.10.9.
Require additionally a blow down mass flow measurement and the logic for changing of
the blow down mass flow.
The pressure is controlled by the turbine valve or start up valve respectively and the
input heat. The control loops are rather easy. The turbine valve can influence the pressure of the boiler very fast. The reaction of the pressure to the change of input heat is
also rather fast and direct.
The spray cooler control logic can be rather simple too.
Fig. 57:
Spray cooler control scheme
3.10.10.
Control Methods
3.10.10.1. PID
Nowadays the PID controls are emulated by micro control logic (i.e. microprocessor).
13.07.15 11:54
3.10.11.
67
1
CO (t) =P e(t) + e(t) dt TD d PV (t)
TI
dt
)]
The variable CO(t) represents the controller output applied to the process at time t,
PV(t) is the process variable coming from the process, and e(t) is the error between the
setpoint and the process variable. Proportional action is weighted by a factor of P, the
integral action is weighted by P/TI, and the derivative action is weighted by PTD where
P is the controller gain, TI is the integral time, and TD is the derivative time.
In 1942, John G. Ziegler and Nathaniel B. Nichols of Taylor Instruments (now part of
ABB Instrumentation in Rochester, N.Y.) published two techniques for setting P, TI, and
TD to achieve a fast, though not excessively oscillatory, closed-loop step response.
Their open loop technique is illustrated by the reaction curve in the figure. This is a strip
chart of the process variable after a unit step has been applied to the process while the
controller is in manual mode (i.e., without feedback).
A line drawn tangent to the reaction curve at its steepest point shows how fast the process reacted to the step input. The inverse of this lines slope is the process time constant
T. The reaction curve also shows how long the process waited before reacting to the
step (the deadtime d) and how much the process variable increased relative to the size
of the step (the process gain K). Ziegler and Nichols determined that the best settings
for the tuning parameters could be computed from T, d, and K as follows:
P=
1.5 T
Kd
TI = 2.5 d
TD = 0.4 d
Once these parameter values are loaded into the PID algorithm and the controller is
returned to automatic mode, subsequent changes in the setpoint should produce the
desired not-too-oscillatory closed-loop response. A controller thus tuned should also
be able to reject load disturbances quickly with only a few oscillations in the process
variable.
13.07.15 11:54
68
Ziegler and Nichols also described a closed loop tuning technique that is conducted
with the controller in automatic mode (i.e., with feedback), but with the integral and derivative actions shut off. The controller gain is increased until any disturbance causes
a sustained oscillation in the process variable. The smallest controller gain that can
cause such an oscillation is called the ultimate gain PU. The period of those oscillations
is called the ultimate period TU. The appropriate tuning parameters can be computed
from these two values according to these rules:
P = PU
TI = 0.625 TU
TD = 0.1 TU
3.10.12.
Load change
3.10.13.
Sliding Pressure
13.07.15 11:54
69
Fig. 60: steam mass flow during cycling with duct burner
13.07.15 11:54
70
3.10.15.
At the load change of the gas turbine the temperature changes are rather low, only the
flue gas mass flow is changing in a wide range and so if the boiler is running in a sliding
pressure mode with the flue gas mass flow the live steam mass flow is changing. With
live steam mass flow the pressure and evaporation temperature increases. But with
higher pressures the temperature changes is rather moderate.
13.07.15 11:54
71
Fig. 63: Gas turbine temperature and mass flow load diagram
[Gen1]
3.10.16.
Duct burner
With a duct burner the load change can be made very rapidly. The input energy with the
fuel is converted very fast in steam because the flue gas temperature at the outlet of
the HRSG is normally the same or lower, so the complete energy is transferred to the
live steam mass flow. The live steam temperature is normally at HRSG with modern gas
turbines constant and controlled by spray coolers.
13.07.15 11:54
72
Like at a start up the temperature changes should not be too big. But at the shut down
it is not such a big problem because the temperature gradients for e.g. the drum can be
controlled very easy by the turbine valve. In this case it must be looked at the temperature at the outlet header of the last superheater. The superheater will be cooled by the
flue gas of the running out gas turbine and the steam. Therefore cooling may be too fast.
3.10.18.
Fig. 64:
Protective load shedding
trip [ABB1]
Fig. 65:
Expected normal shut
down ABB[1]
13.07.15 11:54
73
MULTIPLY
BY
TO OBTAIN
mm
m
in
in
ft
ft
m
cm
in
ft
m/m
ft/ft
m
in
ft
gal (US)
gal (IMP)
litre (=dm)
kg
Ib
N
kp
Ibf
kp
psi
bar
Pa
kPa
kPa
kp/m
mm of water
in of water
in of water
in of wate,
m/s
m/min
m/hr
0.03937
3.2808
0.083333
25.4
12
0.3048
10.764
0.155
0.0069444
0.092903
0.32808
0.3048
35.315
0.0005787
0.028317
0.13368
1.2009
0.26417
2.2046
0.45359
0.22481
2.2046
32.174
9.80665
0.068948
14.5036839
0.0040218
4.0218
0.14504
0.039441
0.03937
0.24864
0.036063
0.0024539
3.2808
3.2808
1.4667
in
ft
ft
mm
in
m
ft
in
ft
m
ft/ft
m/m
ft
ft
m
ft
gal (US)
gal (US)
Ib
kg
Ibf
Ibf
lb ft/s
N
bar
psi
in of water
in of water
Ibf in
in of water
in of water
kPa
ibf in
atmospheres
ft/s
ft/min
ft/s
13.07.15 11:54
74
MASS FLOW
VOLUME
FLOW
MASS
VELOCITY
DENSITY
SPECIFIC
HEAT
THERMAL
CONDUCTIVITY
DYNAMIC
VISCOSITY
KINEMATIC
VISCOSITY
ENERGY
BY
TO OBTAIN
ft/s
ft/min
kg/s
kg/hr
lb/s
lb/hr
m/s
ft/s
ft/min
kg/(s m)
kg/(hr m)
Ib/(s ft)
Ib/(hr ft)
kg/m
g/cm
lb/in
lb/ft
kJ/kg C
kcal/kg C
Btu/lb F
W/m K
cal/s cm K
Btu/hr ftF/in
Btu/hr ft F
kcal/hr m K
W/cm K
Pa s
cP
kg/hr m
lb/s ft
Ibf/s ft
lb/hr ft
Ib/hr ft
m/s
cSt
m/s
kJ
kWhr
0.3048
0.016667
7936.6
2.2046
3600
0.45359
2118.9
60
0.00047195
737.34
0.20482
3600
4.8824
0.062428
62.428
1728
16.018
0.23885
1
4.1868
0.57779
241.91
0.083333
1.7307
0.67197
57.779
2419.1
2.4191
0.67197
3600
115827
0.00041338
0.41338
38750
0.03875
10000
0.94782
3412.1
m/s
ft/s
lb/hr
lb/hr
lb/hr
kg/hr
ft/min
ft/min
m/s
lb/(hr ft)
lb/(hr ft)
lb/(hr ft)
kg/(hr m)
lb/ft
lb/ft
lb/ft
kg/m
Btu/Ib F
Btu/Ib F
kJ/kg C
Btu/hr ft F
Btu/hr ft F
Btu/hr ft F
W/m K
Btu/hr ft F
Btu hr ft F
Ib/hr ft
Ib/hr ft
Ib/hr ft
Ib/hr ft
Ib/hr ft
Pa s
cP
ft/hr
ft/hr
Stokes
Btu
Btu
13.07.15 11:54
75
MULTIPLY
BY
TO OBTAIN
kcal
ft Ibf
hp hr
Btu
Btu
Btu
J
W
kcal/hr
ft Ibf/hr
hp
Btu/hr
Btu/hr
W/m
kcal hr m-
W cm
cal s cm-
Btu-hr ft
Btu. hr ft-
mK/W
hr mK/kJ
hr mK/kcal
s cmK/cal
cmK/W
hr ft F/Btu
hr ft F/Btu
W/(mK)
kJ/(hr mK)
kcal/(hr mK)
cal/(s cmK)
W/(cmK)
Btu/(hr ftF)
Btu/(hr ftF)
C
F
C
F
3.9683
0.0012851
2544.4
1.0551
0.0002931
0.252
0.00027778
3.4121
3.9683
0.0012851
2544.4
0.29307
0.252
0.317
0.36867
3170
13272
3.1546
2.7125
5.6783
20.442
4.8824
0.00013562
0.00056783
0.17611
0.20482
0.17611
0.048919
0.20482
7373.4
1761.1
5.6783
4.8824
1,8C+32
(F-32)/1.8
C+273.15
F+459.69
Btu
Btu
Btu
kJ
kWhr
k cal
W hr
Btu hr
Btu/hr
Btu/hr
Btu/hr
W
kcal/hr
Btu/(hr ft)
Btu/(hr ft)
Btu/(hr ft)
Btu/(hr ft)
W/m
kcal/(hr m)
hr ft F/Btu
hr ft F/Btu
hr ft F/Btu
hr ft F/Btu
hr ft F/Btu
mK/W
hr mK/kcal
Btu/(hr ftF)
Btu/(hr ftF)
Btu/(hr ftF)
Btu/(hr ftF)
Btu/(hr ftF)
W/(cmK)
kcal/(hr mK)
F
C
K
R
Tab. 13
13.07.15 11:54
76
5.
5. Appendix II Disclaimer
Appendix II Disclaimer
KED and the author has attempted to provide accurate information on this script, information on this script may contain technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. The
contents of any documents on this script are believed to be current and accurate as of
their publication dates. KED AND THE AUTHOR assumes no responsibility for the accuracy of the information.
KED OR THE AUTHOR may change the programs or products mentioned at any time
without notice. For the most current and complete documents, please contact KED OR
THE AUTHOR directly. Mention of non-KED products or services is for information purposes only and constitutes neither an endorsement nor a recommendation.
ALL INFORMATION, SOFTWARE, PRODUCTS AND SERVICES PROVIDED ON THIS
SCRIPT ARE PROVIDED AS IS WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, WHETHER
EXPRESS, IMPLIED, STATUTORY OR OTHERWISE. KED AND THE AUTHOR DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, THOSE OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE
AND NONINFRINGEMENT OR ARISING FROM A COURSE OF DEALING, USAGE,
OR TRADE PRACTICE. Some jurisdictions do not allow the exclusion of implied warranties, so the above exclusion may not apply to you.
KED AND THE AUTHOR SHALL NOT BE LIABLE FOR ANY INDIRECT, SPECIAL,
CONSEQUENTIAL, OR INCIDENTAL DAMAGES INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, LOST PROFITS OR REVENUES, COSTS OF REPLACEMENT GOODS, LOSS
OR DAMAGE TO DATA ARISING OUT OF THE USE OR INABILITY TO USE THIS
SCRIPT OR ANY KED PRODUCT, OR DAMAGES RESULTING FROM USE OR RELIANCE ON THE INFORMATION PRESENT, EVEN IF KED OR THE AUTHOR HAS
BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES.
13.07.15 11:54
6. Literature
6.
77
Literature
13.07.15 11:54
78
6. Literature
[Goo1] Goodstine, L., Kurpen, J.J.; Corrosion and Corrosion Product Control in the
Utility Boiler Turbine Cycle. Mater. Perf.; Vol 13. 1, 31; 1974;
[Ver1] F.H. Verhoff, J.T. Banchero; Predicting dew points of flue gases; Chem. Eng.
Progress 70; 1974; p 71/72
[Ras1] Rasch R.; ber die Reaktionen zwischen Eisenoxid und Schwefeldioxid; GIT
Fachz. Lab.; 1978; S. 667- 671;
[Wic1] Wickert, K.; Chemische Probleme bei der Verfeuerung schwerer Heizle in
Hochleistungskesseln und Gasturbinen. Das lfeuerjahrbuch; 1961;
Verlag G. Kopf; Stuttgart
[Gen1] General Electric Data Sheet PG7241(FA) Gas turbine
[ABB1] ABB Gas Turbine GT 13 E2
[Als1] Alstom Power USA; Introducing OCC; Modern Power Systems; July 2001;
TRD Technische Regeln fr Dampfkessel
National Fire Protection Association 8506
British Gas: Guidiance notes on the installation industrial turbines, associated
gas compressors and supplementary firing burners (06/89)
[Smi1] Smith O. J. M., Closer control of loops with dead time; Chemical Engineering
Progress, 53, 217219 (1957); A controller to overcome dead time,
ISA Journal, 6, 2, 2833 (1959).
[Kri1] Krischer, O., Kast, W.; Wrmebergang und Wrmespannungen bei Rippen
rohren; VDI Forschungshefte 474; 1959;
[Esc1] Escoa; Engineering Manual; Escoa Fintube Corporation; Oklahoma USA; 1979;
[VDI1] VDI Heat Atlas; VDI Verlag Dsseldorf; 1993;
[Eis1] Eisenkolb, P, Pogoreutz, M, Halozan, H; Modified Rankine HRSG beats triple
pressure system; ASME paper 96-TA-50;Jakara; ASME Turbo Asia 1996
[Eis2] Eisenkolb, P, Nessler, H, Daublebsky von Eichhain, Chr.;
PREVENTING CONDENSATE HAZARDS IN HRSG SUPER-HEATER
PANELS; PowerGen Orlando, FL; 2002;
[Pea1] Pearson, M., J Michael Pearson & Associates Co Ltd; Anderson, R. W. Florida
Power Corp; SPECIAL REPORT: HRSGs Questions about condensate
quenching, prestart purging, POWER Magazine, July/August 2000
[Hel1] Hellwig, Udo; Instabilitt; BWK Bd 40 Nr. 7/8; 1988;
[Fran1] Franke, J, Lenk, U., Taud, R, Klauke, F.; Successful Combiend Cycle Debut
for Novel Horizontal Flow- Vertical Tube Benson HRSG;
Modern Power Systems; July 2000;
13.07.15 11:54
7. Contact
7.
79
Contact
13.07.15 11:54
80
13.07.15 11:54
Titel HRSG_2.indd 6
29.07.15 13:27
Titel HRSG_2.indd 7
29.07.15 13:27