Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 30 November 2014
Received in revised form 27 January 2015
Accepted 30 January 2015
Available online 7 February 2015
Keywords:
Nanostructures
Co-precipitation
X-ray diffraction
Infrared spectroscopy
Magnetic properties
a b s t r a c t
Nano-crystalline Mg0.5Zn0.5xCuxFe2O4 (x = 0.0, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4 and 0.5) ferrite powders were synthesized
using co-precipitation method. The inuence of Cu2+ ions substitution on the structural and magnetic
properties was investigated. X-ray diffraction measurements revealed the formation of nano-crystalline
ferrite with single cubic spinel phase. The lattice constant was found to decrease with increasing Cu2+
ions content. Infrared spectral analysis conrmed formation of the spinel structure for the respective
ferrite system. Magnetic data showed that the saturation magnetization (Ms) increases with Cu2+ concentration up to x = 0.2 and then decreases with further increase of Cu2+ ions in this ferrite system. The
proposed cation distribution deduced from X-ray diffraction, infrared spectra and magnetization data
indicated mixed ferrite type. Dielectric constants e0 , dielectric loss e0 0 , dielectric loss tangent tan d and
ac conductivity, rac, were investigated as a function of frequency and temperature. Inuence of Cu2+ substation on the ac conductivity exhibited signicant behavior at low frequencies and low temperatures,
T 6 100 C. Both dielectric constants (e0 , e00 ) found to increase with the increase of the temperature. At
low temperatures, dielectric loss tan d indicated a decrease with frequency with slight change at high
temperatures.
2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
Nano-sized spinel-type ferrites having formula MFe2O4 structure (where M is a divalent metal cation) are promising materials
due to their interesting magnetic and electric properties with
chemical and thermal stabilities [1]. The structure of spinel ferrites
consists of a closed-packed oxygen arrangement in which 32 oxygen ions are packed in a unit cell and between the layers of oxygen
ions exist interstices which can be classied into two categories,
tetrahedral (A-site) and octahedral (B-site), depending on the coordination of the nearest neighboring oxygen. Ferrite materials are
used in many applications such as electronics, magnetic storage
and as contrast agents in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) [2].
Much attention has been focused on Mg-ferrite due to its high electrical resistivity and porosity [35]. Moreover, Mg may increase the
sequences of the magnetic hysteresis, so it can be used as a diamagnetic dopant in ferrites. In sensors technology, Mg ferrite
was used as humidity sensor as reported by Shimizu et al. [6].
Corresponding author at: Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, King
Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia; Department of Physics, Faculty of
Science, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt.
E-mail addresses: dakdik2001@yahoo.com, hmzaki@kau.edu.sa (H.M. Zaki).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.01.304
0925-8388/ 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
H.M. Zaki et al. / Journal of Alloys and Compounds 633 (2015) 104114
105
nano-powder was washed several times with distilled water to remove impurities
and then dried at 85 C for 5 h. After drying, the powders were calcined at 900 C in
a programmable thermolyne furnace for 5 h to obtain a single spinel cubic phase. Xray powder diffraction patterns were scanned using Philips Xpert diffractometer
equipped with a graphite crystal monochromator and Copper target
(kka1 = 1.54056 ). The working conditions for the X-ray tube were 40 kV and
25 mA. Each X-ray scan was performed between 15 and 70 (2h). Fourier transform infrared spectra were measured by means of PerkinElmer spectrophotometer
model 1430 within the wave number range of 3501000 cm1 using KBr pressed
pellet technique. Magnetization measurements were performed at room temperature using vibrating sample magnetometer (Lake Shore 7400 series) with sensitivity
of 107 emu at the magnetic eld range 20 to 20 kG.
In the present study, ac conductivity and dielectric parameters were carried out
in the frequency range from 100 Hz to 1 MHz at the temperature range between
300 K and 673 K using LCR HI-Tester (HIOKI 3532-50). The pelletized samples with
diameter 12 mm and thickness of 4 mm were coated on both faces with silver paste
in order to form parallel plate capacitor.
The value of the real dielectric constant (e0 ) was calculated using the following
relation:
e0 Cd=Aeo ;
where C, d and A refer to capacitance, thickness and cross sectional area of the pellet.
The symbol eo is the permittivity of free space.
The complex dielectric constant was calculated using the relation:
e00 e0 tan d;
where tan d is the dielectric loss. Using the dielectric constant and dielectric loss, the
ac conductivity rac of the prepared samples was calculated using the following
formula:
rac e0 e0 tan d;
2. Experimental details
Nano-crystalline powders of Mg0.5Zn0.5xCuxFe2O4 (x = 0.0, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4 and
0.5) were synthesized using co-precipitation method. Stoichiometric quantities of
analytical grade MgCl26H2O, ZnCl2, CuCl2, FeCl36H2O and NaOH were mixed thoroughly in 150 ml distilled water using magnetic stirrer at 80 C. The precipitated
Fig. 1. X-ray diffraction patterns of nanocrystalline Mg0.5CuxZn0.5xFe2O4 ferrites powders synthesized by co-precipitation method.
106
H.M. Zaki et al. / Journal of Alloys and Compounds 633 (2015) 104114
Table 1
Bulk density (dbulk), percentage porosity (p%), lattice constants (aexp, ath), ionic radii (rA, rB), bond lengths (RA, RB), oxygen parameter (U), deviation of oxygen parameter (d),
tetrahedral (mT) and octahedral (mO) infrared bands for Mg0.5Zn0.5xCuxFe2O4 nano-crystalline ferrites.
Concentration (x)
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
dbulk (g/cm3)
P (%)
rA ()
rB ()
ath ()
aexp ()
RA
RB
U
d
mT (cm1)
mO (cm1)
4.8108
2.1
0.9572
0.5264
8.4297
8.4167
2.278
1.883
0.406
0.031
572.2
396.2
4.838
1.7
0.8336
0.5872
8.4016
8.4097
2.154
1.927
0.398
0.023
584.1
437.8
4.8704
1.06
0.7100
0.6480
8.3734
8.4059
2.031
1.976
0.390
0.015
585.5
436.5
4.9114
0.79
0.5314
0.6633
8.3717
8.3896
1.856
2.068
0.378
0.003
576
435.1
4.6374
6.3
0.5318
0.6601
8.3699
8.3887
1.856
2.068
0.378
0.003
586.4
433.1
4.6649
6.0
0.5550
0.6569
8.3682
8.3790
1.870
2.059
0.379
0.004
588.1
430.2
ZM
dx
NA a3
P 1
dbulk
dx
Table 2
Particle size (D), surface area (S), magnetic moments (lth, lexp), saturation magnetization (Ms), coercivity (Hc) and remanence magnetization (Mr) for Mg0.5Zn0.5xCuxFe2O4 nano-crystalline ferrites.
Composition (x)
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
D (nm)
S (m2/g)
lth (lB)
lexp (lB)
Ms (emu/g)
Hc (G)
Mr (G)
Ms/Mr
51
24.46
1.50
1.794
45.424
33.612
3.2178
0.071
62
20.00
2.58
2.075
52.589
27.305
2.7598
0.053
45
27.38
3.66
2.197
55.722
22.153
2.0322
0.037
25
48.87
2.95
1.925
48.867
41.056
3.6258
0.074
76
17.02
1.95
1.747
44.398
32.273
2.8799
0.065
67
19.20
0.95
1.194
30.361
45.989
3.7240
0.123
2
2
2
3
2
3
2
Mg2
0:05y Zn0:5x Fe0:4x Cut Mg0:45y Cuxt Fe1:6xz Fez O4 ;
0:3 6 x 6 0:5
The average cation radius at the tetrahedral and octahedral
sites, rA and rB, are calculated for all samples using the above cation
distributions and given as [30]:
5
where dbulk is the bulk density, which was measured using the
Archimedes principle. The percentage porosity P (%) of the samples
decreases gradually with concentration up to x 6 0.3 indicating
dense packing. Samples with concentration x = 0.4 and x = 0.5 exhibit higher percentage porosity around 6% which may attributed to
the increase of their particle sizes as indicated in Table 2. This
dependence between porosity and particles size has been reported
for some ferrites [28].
In Mg0.5Zn0.5xCuxFe2O4 ferrites the Zn2+ ions exclusively
occupy the tetrahedral (A) sites, while most of the Mg2+ and Cu2+
ions prefer to occupy the octahedral sites (B). The Fe3+ ions are distributed among the tetrahedral and octahedral sites. Furthermore,
substitution of sufcient amount of Cu2+ ions may cause migration
of Fe3+ ions from (B) site to (A) site because the preferency of copper ions to be in the octahedral sites (B-sites) [29]. Considering the
X-ray, infrared and magnetization data the most reliable cation
distribution for the studied ferrites are given as:
2
2
2
3
2
3
Mg2
0:05y Zn0:5x Fe0:85x Cut Mg0:45y Cuxt Fe1:15x O4 ;
0:0 6 x 6 0:2
rB 1=20:45 y r Mg x t r Cu 1:15 x r Fe ;
0:0 6 x 6 0:2
1=20:45 y r Mg x t r Cu 1:6 x z rFe zr Fe2 ;
0:3 6 x 6 0:5
where rMg, rZn, rFe and rCu are the ionic radii of Mg, Zn, Fe and Cu
ions, respectively. Table 1 shows the calculated structural parameters ath, rA and rB based on the proposed cation distributions. The
theoretical lattice parameter (ath) is calculated using the relation
given below, which relates the cation radius of the constituent elements to the lattice parameter at different lattice sites [31]:
p
8
ath p r A Ro 3r B Ro
3 3
where rA and rB are the cations radii at the tetrahedral and octahedral sites, respectively and Ro is the oxygen ion radius (Ro = 1.32 )
[17]. The calculated and experimental values of the lattice parameters (ath, aexp) are given in Table 1. The value of ath vary linearly with
increasing Cu2+ concentration for all the samples. The data in Table 1
shows that the value of ath is slightly different from the experimental
value aexp. This small difference is attributed to the approximation
H.M. Zaki et al. / Journal of Alloys and Compounds 633 (2015) 104114
107
Moment/Mass (emu/g)
X=0.0
X=0.1
X=0.2
X=0.3
X=0.4
X=0.5
the metallic ions, and in spinel like structures. The oxygen positional parameter has a value in the neighborhood of 0.375 for which
the arrangement of O2 ions equals exactly a cubic closed packing.
However, in actual spinel lattice this ideal pattern is slightly
deformed. The higher values of oxygen parameter obtained in this
study may be attributed to the small displacement of anions due
to the expansion of the tetrahedral interstices and the difference
in the chemical composition [34,35]. It is obvious from the data in
Table 1 that the oxygen position parameter decreases with increasing Cu2+ concentration up to x = 0.3 which causes decrease in lattice
parameter in this range as obtained from X-ray results.
The cationanion distances (the bond lengths) at the A-sites, RA,
and B-sites, RB, are calculated using the following relations [35]:
60
-60
-20000
-10000
p
1
RA a 3 d
8
0
10000
12
1
d
RB a
3d2
16 2
20000
Field (G)
Fig. 3. Room temperature magnetic hysteresis loops for Mg0.5CuxZn0.5-xFe2O4
ferrites.
1
1
U p r A RO
4
a 3
where the symbols have their usual meaning. The calculated values
of the oxygen positional parameter are listed in Table 1. In most oxidic spinels, the oxygen ionic radius is apparently larger than that of
d U U ideal
where d represents the deviation from the ideal oxygen parameter
Uideal (=0.375). Values of (U) for Mg1xZnxFe2O4 samples were found
by interpolation between those reported earlier for pure magnesium and zinc ferrites, which are 0.381 and 0.385 A, respectively
[36].
Table 1 also shows the variation of bond lengths RA and RB with
Cu2+ content. RA is the shortest distance between A-site cation and
oxygen ion and RB is the shortest distance between B-site cation
and oxygen ion. It is well known that there is a correlation between
ionic radius and lattice parameter. The data in Table 1 indicate that
with increasing Cu2+ concentration, radius of tetrahedral site is
decreased. The decrease in bond length RA can be attributed to
the decrease in lattice parameter (a) with increasing of Cu2+
108
H.M. Zaki et al. / Journal of Alloys and Compounds 633 (2015) 104114
content due to the fact that the ionic radius of Cu2+ is smaller than
Zn constituent ions that it replaces.
3.2. Infrared spectroscopy
The formation of Mg0.5CuxZn0.5xFe2O4 (0 6 x 6 1.0) ferrites
were conrmed by Fourier transforms infrared spectroscopy (FTIR)
through the existence of characteristic vibrational bands of the tetrahedral (A) and octahedral (B) sites. According to Waldron [37]
there are four bands characterizing ferrites which can be easily
observed in the range of 200700 cm1. The difference in positions
of the bands for the various compositions was expected because of
the difference in the distances for the octahedral and tetrahedral
ions [38]. The four bands can be classied into two groups as
two high-frequency bands and two low-frequency bands. Waldron
attributed the higher absorption band, mT, around 600 cm1 to the
intrinsic vibrations of tetrahedral complexes and the band, mO,
around 400 cm1 to octahedral complexes. The low-frequency
band around 350 cm1 is related to the divalent octahedral
metaloxygen ion complexes while the band around 200 cm1 is
assigned to the divalent tetrahedral vibrations [39,40]. In our case
the low band around 200 cm1 is not observed due to the limited
range of the available spectrometer. It is well known that in ferrites, metal cations are situated according to the geometric conguration of the oxygen ion nearest neighbors in two different sub
lattices such as tetrahedral (A-sites) and octahedral sites (B-sites)
[41]. The band mT is assigned to the vibration of the bond between
the oxygen ion and the tetrahedral metal ion OMtetra and the band
mO is assigned to the vibration of the bond between the oxygen ion
and the octahedral metal ion OMocta [42]. The difference in band
positions is due to change in bond length of Fe3+O2 at tetrahedral
(0.189 nm) and octahedral (0.199 nm) sites respectively [43].
Generally, vibrational frequencies depend on cation mass, cationoxygen distance and the bonding force [44]. The frequencies of
the IR absorption bands and the assignment of these bands corresponding to the studied ferrite samples are shown in Fig. 2.
Fig. 2 exhibits two strong frequency bands (mT, mO) in all the
samples within the measured range 580 and 430 cm1 as the
characteristics bands for the spinel structure conrming the ferrite
structure, where Kamble et al. [45] reported the synthesis of
MgCuZn ferrite (Mg0.48Cu0.12Zn0.40Fe2O4) by ceramic and selfsustaining auto-combustion (sucrose) methods and IR absorption
bands were found to be in the expected high frequency range
(574.95 cm1 and 582.39 cm1) and low frequency range
(431 cm1) which forties the spinel phase and coincide with our
109
H.M. Zaki et al. / Journal of Alloys and Compounds 633 (2015) 104114
-2.0
-2.5
-3.0
x=0.3
log (-1m-1)
log (-1m-1)
-3.5
-4.0
-4.5
x=0.0
-5.0
RT
o
100 C
o
200 C
o
300 C
o
400 C
-5.5
-6.0
-6.5
-2
-4
RT
o
100 C
o
200 C
o
300 C
o
400 C
-7.0
-6
2
log (Hz)
log (Hz)
0
x=0.1
x=0.4
-2
log (-1m-1)
log (-1m-1)
-2
-4
RT
o
100 C
o
200 C
o
300 C
o
400 C
-6
-4
RT
o
100 C
o
200 C
o
300 C
o
400 C
-6
-8
2
log (Hz)
log (Hz)
0
-2
-1
-2
x=0.2
log (-1m-1)
log (-1m-1)
-3
-4
-5
RT
o
100 C
o
200 C
o
300 C
o
400 C
-6
x=0.5
-3
-4
RT
o
100 C
o
200 C
o
300 C
o
400 C
-5
-6
-7
-7
2
log (Hz)
log (Hz)
Fig. 5a. The frequency dependence of the ac conductivity at selected temperature for the Mg0.5CuxZn0.5xFe2O4 ferrites.
110
H.M. Zaki et al. / Journal of Alloys and Compounds 633 (2015) 104114
1.0
log x show straight lines with different slopes at high-range of frequency and low temperature (i.e., for T 6 100 C) whereas for
T > 100 C the behavior of the conductivity becomes less frequency
dependent and almost have a constant value. In other words, the
elevated temperatures enhance the conductivity in which the rate
of enhancement is noticed to be higher in the region of relatively
low temperature. Generally, the behavior of the electrical conductivity can obey the relation:
x=0.0
x=0.1
x=0.2
x=0.3
x=0.4
x=0.5
0.8
0.6
0.4
r r0 expE=kT
0.2
0.0
250
300
350
400
450
500
550
600
650
700
T (K)
Fig. 5b. Effect of temperature on the variation of the exponent factor (s).
6000
Ddbulk
10
where D is the particle size in nm and dbulk is the bulk density of the
particle in g/cm3. The calculated surface area of the nanoparticles
increases with the reduction of the particle size as listed in Table 2.
The saturation magnetizations (Ms) is sensitive to the particle size
or surface area. It is obvious from Table 2, that as the particle size
decreases the surface area increases and the Ms value is increased
too. This behavior is observed for samples with compositions
x = 0.1, 0.2 and 0.3 where the particle size decreases from 62 to
25 nm. Other samples with concentration x = 0.4 and 0.5 exhibit
signicant decrease of the saturation magnetization due to the
increase of their particles sizes or decrease in surface area. This correlation between the particle size and magnetic properties has been
reported for some ferrites compounds [58,59].
3.4. AC conductivity
Fig. 5a indicates the variation of conductivity rac as a function of
frequency at particular temperatures. The plots of log rac against
e e0 ie00
11
111
H.M. Zaki et al. / Journal of Alloys and Compounds 633 (2015) 104114
4
10
x=0.0
103
'
'
RT
o
100 C
o
200 C
o
300 C
o
400 C
10
RT
o
100 C
o
200 C
o
300 C
o
400 C
x=0.3
104
102
101
10
100
10-1
10
logf (Hz)
logf (Hz)
RT
o
100 C
o
200 C
o
300 C
o
400 C
x=0.1
3
10
'
'
10
RT
o
100 C
o
200 C
o
300 C
o
400 C
x=0.4
4
102
10
10
100
logf (Hz)
logf (Hz)
105
10
x=0.2
RT
o
100 C
o
200 C
o
300 C
o
400 C
10
x=0.5
RT
o
100 C
o
200 C
o
300 C
o
400 C
10
10
'
'
103
102
1
10
101
10
logf (Hz)
100
logf (Hz)
112
H.M. Zaki et al. / Journal of Alloys and Compounds 633 (2015) 104114
x=0.0
10 8
RT
o
100 C
o
200 C
o
300 C
o
400 C
10
"
10 6
"
105
RT
o
100 C
o
200 C
o
300 C
o
400 C
x=0.3
10 5
10 4
10 3
10 2
100
10 1
1
logf (Hz)
logf (Hz)
10 8
RT
o
100 C
o
200 C
o
300 C
o
400 C
x=0.1
106
RT
o
100 C
o
200 C
o
300 C
o
400 C
10 6
10 5
104
"
"
105
x=0.4
10 7
10 4
103
10 3
102
10 2
101
10 1
1
logf (Hz)
logf (Hz)
10 9
RT
o
100 C
o
200 C
o
300 C
o
400 C
x=0.2
105
10 8
x=0.5
RT
o
100 C
o
200 C
o
300 C
o
400 C
10 7
"
"
10 6
10 5
10 4
10 3
10 2
100
10 1
1
logf (Hz)
logf (Hz)
Fig. 7. The frequency dependence of dielectric loss (e00 ) at selected temperature for the Mg0.5CuxZn0.5xFe2O4 ferrites.
113
H.M. Zaki et al. / Journal of Alloys and Compounds 633 (2015) 104114
10 3
10 6
x=0.0
x=0.3
RT
o
100 C
o
200 C
o
300 C
o
400 C
RT
o
100 C
o
200 C
o
300 C
o
400 C
10 4
tan
tan
10 2
10
10 1
10 3
10 2
10 1
10 0
10 0
1
logf (Hz)
10 2
10 1
10 0
10 0
2
RT
o
100 C
o
200 C
o
300 C
o
400 C
x=0.4
logf (Hz)
logf (Hz)
x=0.2
RT
o
100 C
o
200 C
o
300 C
o
400 C
10 4
tan
10 2
x=0.5
10 5
RT
o
100 C
o
200 C
o
300 C
o
400 C
10 3
tan
10 2
10 1
10 3
tan
10 3
tan
10 4
RT
o
100 C
o
200 C
o
300 C
o
400 C
x=0.1
10 4
logf (Hz)
10 3
10 2
10
10 1
10 0
10 0
1
logf (Hz)
logf (Hz)
Fig. 8. The frequency dependence of dielectric loss tangent (tan d) at selected temperatures for the Mg0.5CuxZn0.5xFe2O4 ferrites.
114
H.M. Zaki et al. / Journal of Alloys and Compounds 633 (2015) 104114
xmax: s 1
where xmax 2pf max . The relaxation time
ing probability per unit time p as:
s 1=2p or xmax: 2p
12
According to Eq. (12), the Debye relaxation process occurs when the
jumping rate becomes approximately equals to applied eld
frequency which is known as ferrimagnetic resonance [76].
The disappear of the resonance peaks at the compositions,
x = 0.0 and 0.2 may be ascribed to the relatively high resistivity
of these samples or due to shifting of their positions to higher
frequencies beyond the applied range of frequency.
4. Conclusion
Nano-crystalline Mg0.5CuxZn0.5xFe2O4 (0 6 x 6 1.0) ferrite
powders were synthesized by co-precipitation technique. Lattice
constant showed decreasing trend with increasing of Cu2+ concentration due to smaller ionic radius of Cu2+ ions in comparison to
zinc ions. As the lattice constant decreases the X-ray density
increases and the porosity decreases indicating dense packing of
the samples. The magnetic behavior of the nano-crystalline ferrites
exhibited some sensitivity to the particle size and surface area.
Variation of saturation magnetization with Cu content was
explained in terms of the cations redistribution between the sub
lattices A and B and X-ray intensity ratios of the diffraction lines
sensitive to the tetrahedral and octahedral sites. The decrease of
the dielectric constant at low frequency and the appearance of
anomalous dispersion behavior was explained in the light of
MaxwellWagner and Koops models of polarization. Contribution
of two types of charge carries as electrons and holes in the conduction mechanism was attributed to the appearance of two opposite
resonance peaks in plots of the dielectric constant with frequency.
Dielectric loss tan d found to decrease with frequency at low temperatures without signicant change at high temperatures.
References
[1] S. Maensiri, C. Masingboon, B. Boonchom, S. Seraphin, Scr. Mater. 56 (2007)
797.
[2] V. Sepelak, P. Heitjans, K.D. Becker, J. Ther. Anal. Calor. 90 (2007) 93.
[3] T. Nitta, Z. Terada, S. Hayakawa, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 63 (1980) 295.
[4] J. Ding, T.J. Mc. Avoy, R.E. Cavicchi, S. Semancik, Sens. Actuators B 77 (2001)
597.
[5] T. Nitta, F. Fujishima, Y. Matuo, Proc. Int. Meet. Chemical Sensors, Fukuoka,
September, 1983, p. 387.
[6] Y. Shimizu, H. Arai, T. Seiyama, Sens. Actuators 7 (1985) 11.
[7] M. Pardavi-Horvath, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 215 (2000) 171.
[8] A.M. Shaikh, S.C. Watawe, S.A. Jadhav, B.K. Chougule, Mater. Res. Bull. 37
(2002) 2547.
[9] H. Su, H. Zhang, X. Tang, B. Liu, Z. Zhong, J. Alloys Comp. 475 (2009) 683.
[10] D.M. Liu, J. Mater. Sci. 29 (1994) 1507.
[11] M. Sugimoto, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 82 (1999) 269.
[12] H. Inaba, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 78 (1995) 2907.
[13] A. Goldman, Modern Ferrite Technology, Springer, New York, 2006.
[14] A. Daigle, J. Modest, A.L. Geiler, S. Gillette, Y. Chen, M. Geiler, B. Hu, S. Kim, K.
Stopher, C. Vittoria, V.G. Harris, Nanotechnology 22 (2011) 305708.
[15] S. Murthy, Bull. Mater. Sci. 24 (2001) 379.
[16] S.A. Ghodake, U.R. Ghodake, S.R. Sawant, S.S. Suryavanshi, P.P. Bakare P P, J.
Magn. Magn. Mater. 305 (2006) 110.
[17] M. Yan, J. Hu, W. Luo, W.Y. Zhang, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 303 (2006) 249.
[18] J.Y. Hsu, W.S. Ko, H.D. Shen, C.J. Chen, IEEE Trans. Magn. 30 (1994) 4875.
[19] S.F. Wang, Y.R. Wang, T.C.K. Yang, P.J. Wang, C.A. Lu, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 217
(2000) 35.
[20] P.J. Hak, K.J. Ho, C.S. Hee, Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference
on Ferrites, Bordeaux, France, 1996, p. 348.
[21] J. Murbe, J. Topfer, Int. J. Appl. Ceram. Technol. 4 (2007) 415.
[22] M. Airimioaei, C.E. Ciomaga, N. Apostolescu, L. Leontie, A.R. Iordan, L.
Mitoseriu, M.N. Palamaru, J. Alloys Comp. 509 (2011) 8065.
[23] D.N. Bhosale, S.R. Sawant, S.A. Gangal, R.R. Mahajan, P.P. Bakare, Mater. Sci.
Eng. B 65 (1999) 79.
[24] Ch. Sujatha, K. Venugopal Reddy, K. Sowri Babu, A. RamaChandra Reddy, K.H.
Rao, Ceram. Int. 38 (2012) 5813.
[25] R.D. Shannon, Acta Crystall. A32 (1976) 751.
[26] J. Smit, Ferrites Physical Properties of Ferromagnetic Oxides in Relation to
Their Technical Applications, Wiley InterScience, New York, NY, USA, 1959.
[27] T.J. Shindea, A.B. Gadkarib, P.N. Vasambekar, Mater. Chem. Phys. 111 (2008)
87.
[28] T. Slatineanu, A.R. Ioran, M.N. Palamaru, O.F. Caltun, V. Gafton, L. Leontie, Res.
Bull. 46 (2011) 1455.
[29] E. Rezlescu, L. Sachelarie, N. Rezlescu, J. Op. Elect. Adv. Mat. 8 (2006) 1019.
[30] A. Globus, H. Pascard, V. Cagan, J. Physique Colloq. 38 C1 (1977) 163.
[31] H.M. Zaki, H.A. Dawoud, Physica B 405 (2010) 4476.
[32] T. Gron, Philos. Mag. B 70 (1994) 121.
[33] H.M. Zaki, Physica B 407 (2012) 2025.
[34] M.F. Al-Hilli, S. Li, K.S. Kassim, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 324 (2012) 873.
[35] J. Smith, H.P.T. Wijin, Ferrites, Wiley, New York, 1959.
[36] K.J. Standley, Oxide Magnetic Materials, Clarendon Press, Oxford (London),
1972.
[37] R.D. Waldron, Phys. Rev. 99 (1955) 1727.
[38] M.A. Amer, O.M. Hemeda, Hyper. Int. 96 (1995) 99.
[39] S.A. Patil, V.C. Mahajan, A.K. Ghatage, S.D. Lotke, Mater. Chem. Phys. 57 (1998)
86.
[40] B.K. Labde, C. Madan Sable, N.R. Shamkuwar, Mater. Lett. 57 (2003) 1651.
[41] M.A. Gabal, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 321 (2009) 3144.
[42] J. Jacob, M. Abdul Khadar, J. Appl. Phys. 107 (2010) 114310.
[43] K.B. Modi, U.N. Trivedi, P.U. Sharma, V.K. Lakhani, M.C. Chhantbar, H.H. Joshi,
Ind. J. Pure Appl. Phys. 44 (2004) 165.
[44] S.A. Patil, V.C. Mahajan, A.K. Ghatage, S.D. Lotke, Mater. Chem. Phys. 57 (1998)
86.
[45] S.S. Kamble, Vrushali S. Jagtap, P.C. Pingale, Ceram. Int. 39 (2013) 3597.
[46] N. Singh, A. Agarwal, S. Sanghi, P. Singh, Physica B 406 (2011) 687.
[47] S.A. Mazen, M.H. Abdallah, B.A. Sabrah, H.A.M. Hashem, Phys. Stat. Sol. (a) 134
(1992) 263.
[48] L. Neel, Ann. De Phys. 3 (1948) 137.
[49] S.S. Kamble, Vrushali S. Jagtap, P.C. Pingale, Ceram. Int. 39 (2013) 3597.
[50] Hamed Bahiraei, Morteza Zargar Shoushtari, Khalil Gheisari, C.K. Ong, J.
Magnet. Magnetic Mater. 371 (2014) 29.
[51] H. Ohinishi, T. Teranishi, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 16 (1961) 35.
[52] B.D. Cullity, Elements of X-ray Diffraction, second ed., Addison Wesley Pub.
Co., Reading, MA, 1978.
[53] V.K. Lakhani, T.K. Pathak, N.H. Vasoya, K.B. Modi, Sol. St. Sci. 13 (2011) 539.
[54] C. Hayashi, Phys. Today 40 (1987) 44.
[55] A.C.F.M. Costa, L. Gama, C.O. Paiva-Santos, M.R. Morelli, R.H.G.A. Kiminami,
Mater. Sci. Forum 498 (2005) 618.
[56] T.K. Pathak, N.H. Vasoya, V.K. Lakhani, K.B. Modi, Ceram. Int. 36 (2010) 275.
[57] N.H. Vasoya, L.H. Vanpariya, P.N. Sakariya, M.D. Timbadiya, T.K. Lakhani, K.B.
Modi, Ceram. Int. 36 (2010) 947.
[58] J.J. Thomas, A.B. Shinde, P.S.R. Krishna, N. Kalarikkal, J. Alloys Comp. 546 (2013)
77.
[59] I. Shari, H. Shokrollahi, M.M. Doroodmand, R. Sa, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 324
(2012) 1854.
[60] A.M.M. Farea, S. Kumer, K.M. Batoo, A. Yousif, Alimuddin, Physica B 403 (2008)
684.
[61] V.R. Kumar, N. Veeraiah, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 59 (1998) 91.
[62] H.M. Zaki, J. Alloys Comp. 439 (2007) 18.
[63] A.M.M. Farea, S. Kumar, K.M. Batoo, A. Yousef, C.G. Lee, A. Alimuddin, J. Alloys
Comp. 469 (2009) 451.
[64] S. Ghatak, M. Sinha, A.K. Meikap, S.K. Pradhan, Mater. Res. Bullet. 45 (2010)
954.
[65] K.M. Batoo, S. Kumar, C.G. Lee, Alimuddin, Curr. Appl. Phys. 9 (2009) 1397.
[66] J. Maxwell, Electricity and Magnetism, Vol. 1, Oxford University Press, 1873. p.
328.
[67] K.W. Wanger, Ann. Phys. 40 (1913) 817.
[68] C.G. Koops, Phys. Rev. 83 (1951) 1520.
[69] N. Rezlescu, E. Rezlescu, Solid State Commun. 14 (1974) 69.
[70] X.-X. Tang, A. Manthiram, J.B. Goodenough, J. Solid State Chem. 79 (1989) 250.
[71] B.L. Patil, S.R. Sawant, S.A. Patil, Phys. Status Solidi (a) 133 (1992) 147.
[72] R.V. Mangalaraja, S. Ananthakumar, P. Manohar, F.D. Gnanam, J. Magn. Magn.
Mater. 253 (2002) 56.
[73] L.L. Hench, J.K. West, Principles of Electronic Ceramics, Wiley, NY, 1990.
[74] V.L. Mathe, R.B. Kamble, Mater. Res. Bull. 43 (2008) 2160.
[75] M. Penchal Reddy, W. Madhuri, N. Ramamanohar Reddy, K.V. Siva Kumar,
V.R.K. Murthy, R. Ramakrishna Reddy, Mater. Sci. Eng. C 30 (2010) 1094.
[76] N. Rezlescu, E. Rezlescu, Phys. Status Solidi (a) 23 (1974) 575.