!

DAVID THE VG'S LATEST

ATTEMPT TO DEFRAUD THE
CATHOLICS OF GUAM!

(Published on JungleWatch at: http://www.junglewatch.info/2015/12/david-vgs-latest-attempt-to-defraud.html)!

(Tim Rohr, JungleWatch, 12/16/15) - On 11/29/15, David the VG (he was in charge since Apuron
was gone), published a copy of the Certificate of Title for one of the parcels which makes up the
property occupied (and now controlled) by RMS. !

!
(See Attachment 1)!
!

We have already broached the argument (as did Teri Untalan in the PDN) that a Certificate of
Title relative to the ownership of real property means nothing. We all know that one's name can
remain on a Certificate of Title to real property while a separate piece of paper gives away all
use of that property forever - which is what Apuron's 2011 deed restriction did. !

!
!
!

(Link to Teri Untalans article in the PDN: http://www.guampdn.com/story/opinion/2015/12/06/catholics-do-not-followblindly/76768750/)!

(Link to 2011 Deed Restriction: https://www.scribd.com/doc/251710144/RMS-Deed-of-Restriction)!

The Deed Restriction actually did more - it in fact conveyed the title to RMS - but we'll let that be
for now. !

To illustrate the pure willingness of David the VG to lie and deceive, let's just say that the 2011
Deed did not in fact convey title to RMS. Let's just say that it is what they say it is - just a
restriction on the use of the property (never mind that it is forever), and that the archbishop
retains absolute ownership and control. He doesn't of course - as illustrated several times on
this blog and by the legal opinion of Attorney Bronze - but let's just say that he does.!

!
!

(Link to Bronze Legal Opinion: https://www.scribd.com/doc/271063655/Legal-Opinion-Final-Final-052915)!

So if in fact this is the case, then David the VG would have had no qualm with publishing a copy
of the Certificate of Title with the 2011 Deed duly noted in the "memorials" section on the
certificate - as ALL documents effecting the subject property MUST be. !

However, note that the CT published in the U Matuna completely leaves off the record of the
2011 Deed. !

!
(See Attachment 2)!
!
Here is a cleaner copy:!
!
(See Attachment 3)!

Now, if the 2011 Deed did not affect the ownership of the property, why would David the VG
publish a Certificate of Title omitting it, especially when the actual Title Report from Title
Guaranty SHOWS the Deed:!

!
(See Attachment 4)!
!

We cannot accept that he did not know it was supposed to be on there. He's the Vicar General the equivalent to our civil government's attorney general, he's supposed to be the ONE person
in the diocese who knows these things. And even if he is ignorant - that's why the archdiocese
has a legal counsel. Oh wait a minute? Is that now Jackie Terlaje?!

(There is the additional question of HOW this Certificate of Title with the "conveniently" missing
memorial just "happened" to find itself onto the front page of the U Matuna - and further carried
by the PDN. So be warned. If your fingerprints are on this LIE, we will find you.)!

In any event, David the VG, the one who accused Richard Untalan of a vulnus against the
bishop when he, the VG, KNEW, that the property had ALREADY been transferred (see The
Real Villain), is the author of this latest attempt at defrauding the Catholics of Guam. !

!
!

(Link to The Real Villain: http://www.junglewatch.info/2015/01/the-real-villain.html)!

There is a final point that we again want to make. It really doesn't matter what a document is
titled, especially in regards to legal documents. What matters is the operative language in the
document. Apuron (or more precisely his handlers) has tried to camouflage the intent of the
document with words like "declaration" and "restriction." But as the Legal Opinion shows, the
document contains operative language that legally alienates the property:!

!
!
!

"KNOW, THEREFORE, KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, THAT Owner hereby
covenants and declares that the Property is and shall be held, used, transferred, sold
and conveyed subject to the covenants and restrictions set forth herein..." !

(See full document at: https://www.scribd.com/doc/251710144/RMS-Deed-of-Restriction)!

The property is to be HELD, USED, TRANSFERRED, SOLD AND CONVEYED. The only
"covenants and restrictions" the Deed is subject to is 1) it is to be used by RMS, and 2) the deed
is effective upon the date of execution (November 22, 2011). !

And as also stated several times before, there is NOTHING in the language of the document
which demands that RMS remain a seminary. !

The extremely tragic and sad part of all of this is not the alienation of a piece of dirt, regardless
of its value, but the relentless and systematic lying and defrauding of the Catholics of Guam by
their religious leaders. !

Stand fast people. Do not grow weary in well-doing. The Lord knows all. And vengeance is His
(Deuteronomy 32:35).!

Attachment 1!

!
!

Attachement 2!

!
!

Attachment 3!

!
!

Attachement 4!
!

See full Title Report at:!

https://www.scribd.com/doc/260097091/RMS-PTR-L90-2-R1-RNEW!