You are on page 1of 1

44th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Confere AIAA 2003-1978

7-10 April 2003, Norfolk, Virginia

DEPLOYABLE TENSEGRITY MASTS

A.G. Tibert∗
Department of Mechanics, Royal Institute of Technology
SE-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden
S. Pellegrino†
Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge
Trumpington Street, Cambridge, CB2 1PZ, U.K.

Abstract In recent years the concept has received new attention


from scientists in various fields. In the field of deploy-
The tensegrity concept has long been considered as a ba- able aerospace structures a significant number of publi-
sis for lightweight and compact packaging deployable cations,3, 4 reports5–7 and patents8–10 on tensegrity have
structures, but very few studies are available. This pa- recently appeared.
per presents a complete design study of a deployable
tensegrity mast with all the steps involved: initial form- Concerning deployability, a key attraction of the
finding, structural analysis, manufacturing and deploy- tensegrity concept is the disjointed struts, which enable
ment. Closed-form solutions are used for the form- a compact package. The first obstacle in the design
finding. A manufacturing procedure in which the cables of tensegrity structures is finding a prestressed equilib-
forming the outer envelope of the mast are constructed rium configuration. Several methods are available,11, 12
by two-dimensional weaving is used. The deployment but a single method suitable for general problems does
of the mast is achieved through the use of self-locking not yet exist. This is an additional step in comparison
hinges. A stiffness comparison between the tensegrity with traditional deployable masts and adds complexity to
mast and an articulated truss mast shows that the tenseg- the already complicated design of deployable structures.
rity mast is weak in bending. However, the crucial design step is the creation of mech-
anisms that enable reliable folding/deployment; in the
Introduction few studies concerned with deployable tensegrity struc-
Tensegrity structures consist of tension elements (cables) tures7, 13, 14 various approaches have been tested. Here,
forming a continuous network supported and prestressed an approach, involving a self-locking hinge, is proposed.
by discontinuous compression elements (struts). The
word tensegrity is a contraction of tensile integrity. A
definition by Miura and Pellegrino1 classifies a tenseg- Topology and Form-Finding
rity structure “as any structure realised from cables and In any mast design, finding a suitable element topology
struts, to which a state of prestress is imposed that im- is the first task. Compared to other masts, the number of
parts tension to all cables” with the addition that “as topology schemes for tensegrity masts is restricted since
well as imparting tension to all cables, the state of pre- they must be prestressed; at each node the prestressing
stress serves the purpose of stabilising the structure, thus forces must equal to zero. Various schemes for con-
providing first-order stiffness to its infinitesimal mecha- structing tensegrity structures are presented by Pugh.15
nisms.” The origin of tensegrity can be pin-pointed to Snelson16 describes the construction of complex tenseg-
1921 and the work of the Russian sculptor Ioganson, but rity structures from simple modules. One of the struc-
today it is generally regarded that Snelson’s structure X- tures is a mast with three struts per stage, Figure 1. How-
Piece represents the birth of the concept. Fuller2 was the ever, the number of struts per stage is not restricted to
first to look upon tensegrity structure from an engineer- three, any number v is possible. The Snelson masts are
ing point of view, but even though the concept is more created by assembling tensegrity prisms with v struts per
than fifty years old only a few engineering applications stage on top of each other. The prisms are rotated alter-
exist. nately clockwise and counter-clockwise.

∗ Research Associate, Member AIAA. gunnar.tibert@mech.kth.se


† Professor of Structural Engineering, Associate Fellow AIAA.

1
American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics
Copyright © 2003 by A.G. Tibert. Published by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc., with permission.

You might also like