Professional Documents
Culture Documents
http://www.chessvariants.com/d.chess/faq.html
If I have only a king left, how many moves does my opponent have to mate me?
The short answer is: 50. The rule has a few details, and is explained on a separate page.
Can you tell me if there is such a rule as king's facing in chess (where both kings
are line with each other)? Is this illegal?
Kings may face each other. What is not allowed for kings is to be at adjacent positions (see above):
moving a king next to another king means to move the king into check, but it is perfectly legal for
kings to be at the same row or column with no pieces between them.
Confusion may have arisen from a rule of Xiangqi - Chinese Chess. In that game, there indeed is a
rule which disallows kings to `see each other'.
1 of 7
http://www.chessvariants.com/d.chess/faq.html
The logics behind the rule is that the white knight could take the black king, and white would take the
black king earlier than black could take the white king.
In the example, the black king may not move to b5 (the square marked with a red circle), even while
the white knight that attacks that square is pinned.
Can a king move to a square that is attacked only by a piece that when moved
would put his own king in check?
No. A king may never move to a square that is attacked by a piece of the opponent; regardless
whether this piece is `pinned' (would cause check to its own king) when moved or not. Such a move
would still be regarded as moving the king into check.
See the example to the previous question.
If I have lost everything except the King, how many move I have before chess
mate, to make a draw?
The number of moves is 50, i.e., 50 moves for white and 50 moves for black. If there have been (at
least) 50 consecutive moves in which neither of the players has moved a pawn, and in which no piece
has been taken then a player can claim a draw when it is his turn to move. The rule also applies when
both players have other pieces besides their king. So, when the opponent has a pawn, the count starts
again when he has moved his pawn.
2 of 7
http://www.chessvariants.com/d.chess/faq.html
Can a King attack when he is in check or must he move out of check without
attacking?
There are three possible ways to get out of check: the king moves to a square he is not checked (and
this may be done with and without taking a piece), a piece is interposed between the checking piece
and the king, and the piece that checks is taken, either by the king or by another piece.
So the answer is: the king can attack when he is in check. The only condition is that he is not in check
after the move.
If I am in check can I capture the piece that has me in check as long as I don't put
my self back in check?
Yes. Consider the following simple situation:
In this example, the black king is in check, but not mated as he can take the queen, and the queen is
not defended.
Is it true that at the very first move of the game, you are allowed to switch or castle
your king and queen?
No. There is no such move in the standard rules of chess.
3 of 7
http://www.chessvariants.com/d.chess/faq.html
If one moves a pawn to the other side of the board while having already a queen
on the board, can one get a second queen?
Yes. In this way, one can get two, or even more queens. I've seen games played by young players at
the local chess club where a player had three queens (by two pawn promotions).
Is it legal to take the piece to which a pawn is promoted in the next move
Suppose a pawn is promoted to some piece, e.g., a queen. The question is: is it legal for the opponent
to take that piece in the very first move after the promotion?
The answer is: yes. The promoted piece can be taken just as any other piece.
4 of 7
http://www.chessvariants.com/d.chess/faq.html
In the diagram above: suppose white king and rooks have never moved. Castling long is legal for
white, but in fact the worst move he can make!
Does a player win when his king reaches the opponents side of the board?
Today I played a game with my friend and he said he won when he moved his king to my
side of the board. Is this a real rule or a fake rule?
This rule is fake. There is no rule that tells that a player can win by moving his king to some position.
A game of chess is won by mating the king of the opponent. You can also win if your opponent resigns
the game, or when using chess clocks, on time, or in an official match with an arbiter, when the arbiter
declares you have lost (e.g., because you refuse to comply with the rules.)
5 of 7
http://www.chessvariants.com/d.chess/faq.html
however.
A simple example:
Suppose white moves his queen to c5, where he thinks he can mate the black king. However, as this
exposes his king to the black rook on a6, the move is illegal. Thus, he may not play this move, and
must play another move. As he has already touched the queen, he must make a queen move if
possible: so he must play Qa7 x a6, taking the rook with his queen. While he now sees that taking the
rook with the bishop is a much better move, he may not do so: he is forced to make the only possible
legal move with his queen.
6 of 7
http://www.chessvariants.com/d.chess/faq.html
Does it mean that you lose the game when you accidently knock down your king?
I recently played in a high school dual meet. My opponent was beating me and during
my turn he knocked over his king by mistake. We stopped the clocks and the game and
asked our coaches if this means he resigns because I would accept the resignation. His
coach said to keep playing as if it never happened. My opponent eventually beat me,
although I said that I accept his mistake resignation. My question is did I or he win the
game??
I agree with the coach of your opponent. Knocking down a king by accident while not intending to
resign does not mean one loses the game. For instance, when a player reaches to get a cup of tea and
when doing so, accidently knocks down his king, this does not mean he resigns, and the game should
just continue as if nothing happened.
When a player knocks down his king intending to resign and afterwards see that his position is not bad
and wants to continue however, then it is too late: he signified to resign and that is it.
So, indeed, the opponent did win the game.
Who starts first in chess? How do we decide, who has the first move?
The player with the white pieces starts first.
In a tournament, the tournament directors decide this: it is always the player mentioned
first that goes first (and hence plays white). So, if the list of games to play says: Anna Bob, then Anna has white and goes first, and Bob plays black and goes second.
In other case, often one of the players takes two pawns: a white one and a black one. In
each of his hands, he has one of the pawns disclosed, and the other plays picks randomly
a hand, and plays with the color of the pawn in the hand he has chosen.
More information?
See the rules of chess, or The FIDE-laws of chess.
Written by Hans Bodlaender. Thanks to a reader `Bonnie' who noted a mistake.
WWW page created: September 29, 1997. Last modified: December 1, 2002.
7 of 7