Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Rachel Mitchell
Assistant Group
Engineer
Highways &
Transportation
Atkins
David A Smith
Service Director
Structures
Highways &
Transportation
Atkins
Claire Seward
Senior Group Engineer
Highways &
Transportation
Atkins
Introduction
Ap Lei Chau Island side the line will
run directly into a tunnel on leaving
the bridge, under the rocky outcrop
and existing tower blocks.
The detailed design of the bridge
was undertaken by Atkins as part of
a traditional contract covering the
bridge, sections of viaduct works
and certain stations for the Client,
MTR Corporation. The construction
contract was put out to tender in
summer 2010 with construction of
the bridge programmed to begin in
2011.
Form of bridge
The bridge consists of three
continuous spans of lengths 58.5m,
115m and 73m (Figure 2). At the
south abutment the bridge leads
straight into a tunnel, at the north
Structures
73
128
Deck design
Design standards
The bridge was designed to MTRs
in-house design standards1. These
standards are based on the Structures
Design Manual for Highways and
Railways (SDMHR) published by the
Hong Kong Highways Department2.
The SDMHR is largely based on
BS 54003 but with modifications
appropriate to local conditions in
Hong Kong. For some aspects of the
design, reference was also made to
the new Eurocode BS EN 1992-2
Design of Concrete Bridges4.
Global analysis
The global analysis of the bridge was
carried out using a 3-D space frame
line beam model. A separate shear
flexible grillage model was used to
determine the distribution of load
effects between the two webs. The
space frame model allowed the
construction sequence and tendon
stressing operations to be taken into
account and automated the creep,
shrinkage and loss calculations for
the post tensioned box.
Uplift
The short side spans meant that
under some loading conditions,
uplift was generated at the bearings.
The transverse wind loading on
the noise barrier also generated a
twisting at the deck end which gave
more uplift on one side. A number
of options to eliminate this uplift
were investigated. Increasing the
mass of the deck at the side spans
by increasing the wall thicknesses
and extending the solid diaphragm
section was considered. However
this did not provide sufficient
additional mass to fully eliminate the
uplift. The uplift generated by the
eccentric transverse wind loading
was minimised by widening the
diaphragm at the bearing location
(Figure 4). This both increased the
total dead load and increased the
spacing of the bearings, thereby
increasing the lever arm for the
bearing reactions, reducing the final
uplift force.
Diaphragm design
The deck diaphragms at the piers and
abutments are required to transfer
the loading from the box section
into bearings at the abutments or
into the piers. These elements were
designed using strut and tie analysis.
The checks of the compression
struts, ties and nodes were carried
out in accordance with the guidance
given in BS EN 1992-2. Limits on
compressive stresses and tension at
ULS are given in this code. At the
Serviceability Limit State (SLS) the
tension stress in the bars was limited
to 200MPa to ensure strains under
service loads and thus cracking was
limited. Suspension reinforcement
to transfer the shear forces from
the box webs into the top of the
diaphragms was provided based
on the guidance by Leonhardt5.
Separate models were developed for
the maximum torsion and maximum
shear load cases.
Tendon arrangement
The post-tensioning tendons are
arranged in the box in accordance
with the guidance in Appendix D of
BS 5400 Part 4. In order to simplify
the construction process, as much
Structures
75
128
Foundations
Structures
Abutment and
foundation design
North abutment
The north abutment is located on
the steep slopes of the rocky outcrop
with the Seminary building on top. It
78
South abutment
The south abutment is located on
the steep slopes of the rocky outcrop
with the Sham Wan Towers building
on top. It provides the end supports
and shared interface structure for the
Aberdeen Channel Bridge and the
tunnels of the adjacent contract.
Sustainability
The Atkins sustainability index
tool
Atkins has recently developed an
in-house tool to determine and
measure various sustainability aspects
for bridge schemes. The objective is
to use the tool during both outline
and detailed design phases of a
scheme to understand the effects
of changing different aspects of a
structure on its overall sustainability.
The Sustainability Index raises
awareness of sustainable aspects of
design and construction of a scheme
to all members of the team, including
the Client.
Aspects considered by the
Sustainability Index Tool include:
Economy (Initial Cost, Whole
Life Cost, User delay during
construction)
Environment (Extent of loss
of habitat, Noise during
construction, Noise during service)
Society (Aesthetics, User delay
during construction)
Resources (Use of recycled
material, Consumption of natural
128
Attribute
Measure
Grade
Economy
Initial cost
1 out of 13
3 out of 16
7 out of 10
-1 out of 4
Aesthetics
7 out of 14
1 out of 13
Environment
Society
Resources
Use of recycled materials
7 out of 11
>2.50 (tonnes/m )
10
6 out of 10
Climate change
Structures
79
Acknowledgements
This paper is submitted with the approval of the Hong Kong MTR Corporation. The authors would also like to thank
Atkins design management team led by Douglas Simmons and Bruce Gillespie for their crucial role in coordinating
all aspects of the detailed design, including Client liaison, architectural input and interfaces with other third party
consultants and stakeholders.
This paper was first published in Proceedings fib Symposium Prague 2011.
References
1.
MTR Corporation Limited, New Works Design Standards Manual Section 4 Civil Engineering, MTR
Corporation Limited, Hong Kong, April 2009.
2.
The Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, Structures Design Manual for Highways and
Railways, 3rd Edition, HKSAR, Hong Kong, August 2006.
3.
British Standards Institution. Steel, Concrete and Composite Bridges, Part 4 Code of practice for design of
concrete bridges. BSI, London, 1990, BS5400.
4.
British Standards Institution. Eurocode 2: Design of Concrete Structures Part 2-2: Concrete bridges Design
and detailing rules. BSI, London, 2005, BS EN 1992-2.
Leonhardt, F, Koch, R and Rostasy, F.S, Suspension reinforcement for indirect load application to prestressed
5.
concrete beams: test report and recommendations, Beton und Stahlbetonbau, 1971, Vol. 66, Issue 10, pp.
233-241.
80