Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Damaged in a fire Nicotine with flaking paint Sealed in grime and abundant bad retouchings
Obviously,
each
one
is
tested
to
discover
the
best
and
safest
way
for
its
particular
needs.
No
off
the
shelf
products
are
used.
You
dont
hit
it
with
a
mop!
As
a
painting
conservator
in
private
practice
I'm
asked
everyday
over
the
phone
or
from
a
photo
and
email,
"How
much
does
it
cost
to
clean
a
painting?"
as
if
it
were
a
per
square
inch
trades-estimate
like
laying
electrical
conduit
or
painting
a
house.
We
don't
hit
anything
with
a
mop.
The
article
below
illustrates
well
the
discovery
process
and
the
care
required
on
this
particular
Old
Master
painting.
But
Old
Master
paintings
clean
differently
than
Impressionist
paintings.
Beaux
Arts
paintings
clean
differently
than
Post
War
Abstract
Expressionism.
Modern
acrylic
paintings
are
different
than
your
family's
19th
century
family
portrait.
In
fact,
we
worked
on
the
famous
series
of
40
paintings,
ALL
done
between
1874
and
1886
of
the
Spanish
missions
of
California
by
(THE
SAME
ARTIST)
Henry
Chapman
Ford
for
the
Mission
Inn
in
Riverside
CA...
and
everyone
of
them
had
to
be
cleaned
differently
than
the
other.
It
takes
discovery
and
analysis,
care
and
judgment
and
a
professional
work
ethic.
To
see
the
difference
between
cleaning
the
artwork
in
this
article
and
an
Impressionist
picture
with
a
lot
less
complications
watch
this
short
time-lapse
cleaning
video
of
a
renown
CA
Impressionist
Edgar
Payne's
artwork...
and
this
wasn't
a
quick-wipe-
cleaning
either!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-DSzHcEBZ40
Give
us
a
call
and
well
gladly
take
the
time
to
discuss
your
questions.
Connect
with
us
and
well
inspect
your
painting
and
give
you
an
estimate
for
free.
If
you
live
between
Monterey,
Ca
and
San
Diego
or
Las
Vegas
and
Salt
Lake
City,
well
even
provide
door
to
door
service.
Contact
Fine
Art
Conservation
Laboratories
at
805
564
3438
http://www.FineArtConservationlab.com
for
a
short
video
tour
of
our
lab
If
we
are
going
to
invest
the
time
and
resources
to
fully
conserve
a
work
of
art,
we
want
to
be
sure
the
work
is
worth
the
effort.
Is
the
painting
worthy
of
the
time
and
resources?
Are
we
learning
anything
about
the
painting,
the
artist,
or
the
subject?
Is
the
original
in
good
enough
condition
to
reveal
it,
or
is
the
damage
too
severe?
The
NCMA
portraits
of
Lord
and
Lady
Cavendish
by
Paul
van
Somer
have
rarely
left
the
gallery
walls
in
the
past
few
decades.
They
are
considered
key
works
in
our
collection,
holding
an
important
place
as
good
early
portraits
and
favorites
of
our
Education
Department.
The
Cavendish
family
was
prominent
in
early
17th-century
England.
Our
Lord
William
was
a
leading
member
of
court
society,
a
member
of
Parliament,
and
a
close
friend
of
King
James
I.
After
Williams
untimely
death
from
overindulgence,
his
wife,
Lady
Christian,
navigated
debt
and
civil
war
to
preserve
the
family
fortunes.
While
many
paintings
are
attributed
to
Paul
van
Somer,
only
a
handful
are
irrefutably
by
his
hand.
A
Flemish
portrait
painter,
Van
Somer
went
to
England
at
age
40
and
quickly
became
a
favorite
of
King
James
I
and
his
Queen
Anne
of
Denmark.
Van
Somers
work
in
England
formed
an
important
transition
between
the
stiff
and
formal
paintings
of
Queen
Elizabeths
day
and
the
more
naturalistic
painting
realized
by
Van
Dyck
in
the
mid
17th
century.
Van
Somer
died
at
45,
leaving
behind
only
a
few
documented
paintings,
making
the
NCMAs
signed
and
dated
pair
highly
important
to
the
understanding
of
his
oeuvre.
In
the
natural
course
of
events,
restoration
seems
to
happen
about
once
every
hundred
years
when
works
of
art
change
hands,
are
inherited,
sold,
or
purchased.
Each
cycle
tends
to
include
retouching
or
overpainting
and
the
application
of
varnish.
With
time
these
restorations
age
and
degrade,
resulting
in
darkening
and
discoloration.
As
a
result
the
quality
of
the
artists
work
becomes
harder
to
discern,
sometimes
to
the
point
that
you
cant
see
the
original
at
all.
Our
400-year-old
Van
Somers
appear
to
have
received
at
least
three
rounds
of
restoration.
While
the
paintings
are
readable,
we
see
only
a
suggestion
of
the
original
color
and
detail.
A
modern
conservation
treatment
addresses
this
by
removing
all
nonoriginal
material
to
the
extent
possible
without
damaging
the
work
of
the
artist.
Conservators
have
to
proceed
with
great
caution
to
avoid
any
damage
to
the
original
painting.
The
preferred
route
is
to
unpack
the
accumulated
layers
one
by
one,
systematically
removing
them
from
newest
to
oldest.
The
most
recent
varnish
and
restoration
paint
on
our
Cavendish
portraits
was
probably
applied
in
the
early
20th
century,
not
long
before
they
came
to
the
Museum
in
the
1950s.
This
restoration
layer
was
removed
fairly
quickly
with
simple
mixtures
of
mild
solvents
applied
with
large
cotton
swabs.
The
next
layer
probably
dates
from
the
18th
or
early
19th
century.
Aging
restoration
materials
tend
to
become
increasingly
insoluble
with
time.
These
layers
follow
that
pattern,
requiring
more
complex
cleaning
systems
with
stronger
solvents.
This
layer
can
be
indirectly
dated
by
the
late
17th
century
cartalini
or
inscription
in
the
lower
corner
of
each
portrait
that
was
painted
on
top
of
this
restoration
layer.
This
restoration
covers
paint
damage,
losses
that
suggest
water
damage,
and
long
creases
that
might
occur
from
trauma
or
neglect.
This
last
layer
of
restoration
proved
to
be
very
hard
and
insoluble,
difficult
if
not
impossible
to
remove
with
conventional
cleaning
methods.
Conservators
often
avoid
removing
this
type
of
restoration
for
fear
of
damaging
the
underlying
original.
But
with
the
help
of
a
laser
invented
by
Duke
professor
and
art
conservator
Adele
De
Cruz,
combined
with
solvents
and
scalpels,
we
are
able
to
remove
this
layer
and
reveal
the
underlying
original
colors
and
details.
This
work
is
performed
under
high
magnification
to
ensure
the
original
paint
surface
isnt
harmed.
This
is
really
slow
work,
a
few
inches
a
day
at
best.
Weve
uncovered
numerous
fine
details
of
Van
Somerss
technique,
including
the
beautifully
painted
garments
and
the
diamond
and
pearl
jewelry.
Most
exciting
has
been
the
rediscovery
of
the
long-lost
emerald
green
background
and
the
blue
feather
in
Lady
Cavendishs
hair.
This
work
is
slowly
changing
the
paintings
from
their
overall
brown
appearance
to
the
subtle
but
opulent
red,
purple,
and
green
color
scheme
initially
realized
by
the
artist.
The
cleaning
is
also
revealing
long
scratches
and
numerous
islands
of
paint
loss,
as
well
as
significant
abrasion
and
alteration
from
past
restorations.
Nevertheless,
along
with
the
reality
of
what
the
painting
has
lost
comes
the
revelation
of
long-hidden
nuance
and
detail,
evidence
of
the
artists
hand
that
has
been
obscured
by
time
and
restoration.
If
weve
done
our
job
well,
then
we
have
a
whole
new
understanding
of
the
skill
of
Paul
van
Somer,
and
a
better
idea
of
what
Sir
William
and
Lady
Christian
really
looked
like.