Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Speaker
24
3
1
0
1.
2.
3.
4.
Very Good
Good
Almost poor
Bad
Most participants like the speaker since he did give a clear information about a new
topic which is interesting to most of the participants.
Beneficial
17
16
1
0
Most participants think the content of the topics is beneficial and interesting to
them.
All the participants have no problem with the comfort of the room and the clarity of
the sounds during the seminar
Time
23
3
1
4
2
Most participants think the time punctuality is good while some feels the time of
start rather late.
Duration
21
11
4
2
A few participants have a problem with the duration of the seminar which is longer
than the allocated time.
Publication
18
9
7
Many feels the publicity of the seminar is not very good, some even states the
publicity needs more addressing.
Content of Event
21
13
2
0
The content of the event is interesting and beneficial to all the participants
Theme of Event
23
11
2
0
experienced speaker to make the event the more interesting. 1 critics however
state that he/she feels that the speaker is not good enough so we should have ask
for a better speaker.
Best way to publish an event
23
19
18
7
4
2
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
f.
Twitter
Path
Poster
Friends/mouth to mouth
Chatting groups
Other..
Chatting groups are the most popular option in the best way to publish an event
with poster and mouth to mouth coming second and third respectively. Some
participants are also suggesting using Instagram for publications as oppose to other
social media such as twitter and path.
Conclusion
Overall feedback is very good, the speaker and the content is already very good.
There are some need for improvements such as the time and duration of the
seminar and most importantly is to improve the publication of the seminar with
frequent broadcast on messenger and social media while also taking advantage of
mouth to mouth broadcast