You are on page 1of 5

Evaluation Report

Speaker
24

3
1
0

1.
2.
3.
4.

Very Good
Good
Almost poor
Bad

Most participants like the speaker since he did give a clear information about a new
topic which is interesting to most of the participants.

Beneficial
17

16

1
0

Most participants think the content of the topics is beneficial and interesting to
them.

Comfort and Clarity of Sounds


18
16

All the participants have no problem with the comfort of the room and the clarity of
the sounds during the seminar

Time
23

3
1

4
2

Most participants think the time punctuality is good while some feels the time of
start rather late.

Duration
21

11

4
2

A few participants have a problem with the duration of the seminar which is longer
than the allocated time.

Publication
18

9
7

Many feels the publicity of the seminar is not very good, some even states the
publicity needs more addressing.

Content of Event
21

13

2
0

The content of the event is interesting and beneficial to all the participants

Theme of Event
23

11

2
0

Most participants feel the theme of the event is very good

What they Say


All but 1 participants say that the content of the event is beneficial to them. Some
states that the content is interesting to them and it may help them to improve their
knowledge on HVAC systems. All but 1 participants understand the content given by
the speaker stating the speaker is clear in giving information and communicative
enough. All the participants are willing to participate again in a similar event held by
ASHRAE with some preferring topics (Green Building, Marine HVACs, healthy
building, and how to build refrigeration equipment). Some also prefer more than 1

experienced speaker to make the event the more interesting. 1 critics however
state that he/she feels that the speaker is not good enough so we should have ask
for a better speaker.
Best way to publish an event
23

19

18

7
4
2

a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
f.

Twitter
Path
Poster
Friends/mouth to mouth
Chatting groups
Other..

Chatting groups are the most popular option in the best way to publish an event
with poster and mouth to mouth coming second and third respectively. Some
participants are also suggesting using Instagram for publications as oppose to other
social media such as twitter and path.
Conclusion
Overall feedback is very good, the speaker and the content is already very good.
There are some need for improvements such as the time and duration of the
seminar and most importantly is to improve the publication of the seminar with
frequent broadcast on messenger and social media while also taking advantage of
mouth to mouth broadcast

You might also like