Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Hong Wu
Hao Zhang
Chao Li
hwu@uestc.edu.cn
haozhanghao87@163.com
lichaotiger@gmail.com
ABSTRACT
retrieval system.
General Terms
Algorithms, Measurement, Experimentation.
Keywords
medical imaging, image classification, multiple kernel learning,
feature fusion.
1. INTRODUCTION
With the progress of digital imaging technologies, a large number
of medical images have been generated by hospitals and medical
centers in recent years [1]. These visual data play an increasingly
important role in diagnosis, treatment planning and education [2],
and are commonly integrated into PACS, published as online
collections or in the online content of journals. These large image
repositories produce a strong need to effective medical image
2. RELATED WORKS
Different visual features have been used for medical image
classification. Among them, edge, shape and global texture
features [4, 5, 6] were commonly used. Local features and bagof-features representation, which are successfully applied for
object recognition, are also used for medical image classification
[6, 7, 8]. To take advantage of both kinds of features, some works
combine different global and local features into a unique feature
representation [4, 6, 9].
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for
personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are
not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that
copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. To copy
otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists,
requires prior specific permission and/or a fee.
ICIMCS'10, December 30-31, 2010, Harbin, China.
Copyright 2010 ACM 978-1-4503-0460-3/10/12...$10.00.
and rotation-invariance is removed. ModSIFT is used with bagof-features representation in our experiments.
3.2 Classifier
In this paper, we use multiple kernel learning for medical image
classification. For this multi-class classification, the one-vs-rest
strategy is used.
A normal SVM classifier is designed for two-class problem, and
can treat with only a single kernel. Given n training samples
is the input vector and label
{(x i , yi )}in1 , where xi 0
Some works have applied MKL for object recognition and image
classification. Varma et al. [16] proposed using MKL to fuse
various kinds of image features and made experiments with
Caltech-101/256. Similarly, Nilsback et al.[17] applied a MKLbased feature fusion to flower image classification. On the other
hand, Kumar et al. [18] used MKL to estimate combination
weights of the spatial pyramid kernels (SPK) [19] with a single
kind of image features. Lampert et al.[20] estimated the degree of
contextual relations between objects in the setting of multiple
object recognition employing MKL. Joutou and Yanai [21]
employed MKL-based feature fusion method for food image
recognition. In this paper, we use MKL for medical image
classification.
yi 1,1 .
f (x)
(x) b
(1)
3. OUR METHOD
3.1 Visual Features
(2)
f ( x ) i k ( x i , x) b
(3)
i 1
j 1
with j 0,
(4)
j 1
j 1
4. EXPERIMENTS
4.1 Dataset
In our experiments, we construct a dataset by selecting images
from the IRMA dataset, which has been used in the annotation
subtask of ImageCLEFmed2009. In IRMA dataset, the image
annotation is based on the hierarchical Image Retrieval in Medical
190
accuracy
Gabor
85.28 1.92%
ModSIFT
Gabor+ModSIFT
Gabor+ModSIFT(MKL)
94.87 1.58%
96.01 0.99%
96.68 1.23%
5. CONCLUSIONS
feature
(5)
191
6. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work is supported by the National Science Foundation of
China under grants 60873185 and by the Key Program of the
Youth Science Foundation of UESTC under Grant JX0745
7. REFERENCES
[1] Robb R. A. 1999 Biomedical Imaging, Visualization, and
Analysis, Wiley-Liss.
[2]
[3] Gld M.O., Kohnen M., Keysers D., Schubert H., Wein B.B.,
Bredno J., Lehmann T.M. 2002. Quality of DICOM header
information for image categorization. In Proceedings SPIE,
4685, 280-287.
[4] Qiu B., Xiong W., Tian Q., Xu C.S. 2005. Report for
annotation task in ImageCLEFmed 2005. In Working Notes
of CLEF 2005. Vienna, Austria.
[19] Lazebnik S., Schmid C., and Ponce J. 2006. Beyond bags of
features: Spatial pyramid matching for recognizing natural
scene categories. In Proceedings of IEEE Computer Vision
and Pattern Recognition, CVPR06. 21692178.
[5] Deselaers T., Weyand T., Keysers D., Macherey W., Ney H.
2005. FIRE in ImageCLEF 2005: Combining contentbased
image retrieval with textual information retrieval. In CLEF
2005 Proceedings, Springer, Lecture Notes in Computer
Science (LNCS). 4022. 652661.
[6] Liu J., Hu Y., Li M., Ma S., Ma W.Y. 2006. Medical image
annotation and retrieval using visual features. In CLEF 2006
Proceedings, Springer, Lecture Notes in Computer Science
(LNCS). 4730. 678685.
[25] Lowe, D.G. 1999. Object recognition from local scaleinvariant features. In Proceedings of International
Conference on Computer Vision, ICCV99. 2, 11501157.
[26] Tommasi T., Orabona F., Caputo B. 2002. Discriminative
cue integration for medical image annotation. Pattern
Recognition Letters. 29, 15 (Nov. 2008), 19962002
[27] Gueld M. O., Keysers D., Deselaers T., Leisten M., Schubert
H., Ney H., Lehmann T.M. 2004. Comparison of Global
Features for Categorization of Medical Images. In
Proceedings of SPIE, 5371, 211-222.
[28] Zhang J., Marszalek M., Lazebnik S., and Schmid C. 2007.
Local Features and Kernels for Classification of Texture and
Object Categories: A Comprehensive Study. International
Journal of Computer Vision, 73, 2 (June, 2007), 213238.
[13] Bach F., Lanckriet G., and Jordan M. 2004. Multiple kernel
learning, conic duality, and the smo algorithm. In
Proceedings of International Conference on Machine
Learning. ICML04.
192