Professional Documents
Culture Documents
D. Christopher Dixon
School of Chemical Engineering, University of N e w South I17ales, Kensington, S.S.IT7. 2033, Australia
Provided that the physical relationships governing a system are understood, the number of degrees of freedom can be determined by counting the boundary and geometrical variables and subtracting the number
of independent relationships among the boundary variables. The dynamic number of degrees of freedom
can exceed the static, the difference being equal to the number of independent hold-ups which are undetermined at steady state. Addition of control loops can make dynamic and static numbers of degrees of fteedom equal, if they were not previously, but not every control system changes the number of degrees of
freedom. A distillaticn column i s used as a special example, and the results of applying the present analysis
are compared with those of previous writers.
T h e r e has been some discussion in recent years of the determination of the number of degrees of freedom available in
steady-state design problems (Forsyth, 1970; Hoffman, 1964)
and in cont'rol syst'em design problems (Howard, 1967;
Yurrill, 1965). The accent has been on distillation columns,
aiid other multistage separation processes, since these are
among the more complex of commoii processes. The following
discussion will concentrate 011 the control syst,em design case,
which has some aspects which are not involved in the st'eadystate case and which does iiot appear to have been properly
treated in the literature. However, the approach to be presented is also applicable to steady-state design problems and
may be of interest as an alternative to previous methods in
this contest.
The number of degrees of freedom in a given problem is
equal to the number of variables involved minus the number
of independent equations (constraints) relating them. This
is the number of variables whose values may be arbitrarily
specified (within certain ranges aiid as functions of time in an
unsteady-state situation), thereby determining the values
of the other variables. The phase rule gives the number of
degrees of freedom required to fix the intensive state of a
tem a t (mechanical, thermal, aiid chemical) equilibrium. However, in the more general cases to be considered
here, open systems are involved and several types of constraint other than equilibrium. Thus, although the analysis
could be based on the phase rule with additional const'raints
(Gillilaiid aiid Reed, 1942), it seems simpler t'o start' from
first principles, lisbing all constraints without special attention
to those considered by t,he phase rule.
The determination of the iiumber of equations relating the
variables of a system requires a thorough understanding of
the physical relationships involved. It does not seem likely
that any method for determining the iiumber of degrees
of freedom of a system can be applied without this knowledge.
Hence, the best t,hat' can be expected is a method n-hich does
not require a detailed formulation of the syst'em equations.
Basic Analysis
v,=
v d
Nbv
S b v
- Arbes
(2)
(3)
S b e
Composition
Temperature
Pressure
Or another set of (W 1) intensive properties, where A' is the
number of chemical compounds present.
Material
Heat
Shaft work ( L e , , all work except flow work).
(Flow work is not listed separately, because it ib determined
by the flow rate and pressure of the material.)
b. Equations
1.
Balance
input
output
consumption
accumulation
rate
rate
rate
rate
nhere t = time
2 = amount in the system = hold-up
(a) Material
(b) Energy (total)
(c) llechanical energy or momentum
2.
Equilibrium
Rote
or
(a) Mechanical
v,= 5,"
(4)
199
a;.voi. f l o w
constant pressure
cd oe n ssti at y
I rquld
I
I
I
L - - - -
syslem
boundory 2 - - - - J
00' Qo(h)
' b . P u m p e d - d i s c h a r g e Tonk
liquid
c o n s t a n t - speed
0, i n d e p e n d e n l o f h
Heat Exchanger
constant
comp0:ition
Liquid A
d. Isothermal Reactor
Feed
product
overf lo w
perfectly mixed
Figure 1.
Simple examples
nT/-f+FL/'o
a. G r a v i t y - d i s c h a r g e T o n k
a.
Qo (valve setting does not vary, because the stem does not cross the
boundary)
Nbej
1
Material balance
V s = 2 - 1 = 1 E.g., inlet flon- rate
Liquid hold-up is determined by h , which
Vd - V , = 0
is related to Qo
=
s b v
Qi,
b.
Sb,.=
-1=0
V,
I'd
- V, = 1
Pumped-Discharge Tank
Q i (Qo is constant)
Material balance
Q i must equal Qo a t steady state
Liquid accuniuhtioii is determined by h ,
which is not fixed by the boundary
variables
C.
xb,. =
A-beS
12
6
V 3 = 12 - 6
Vd
- T.', = 0
d.
I\lhv
2 5
Shes =
+1
a\-
Vq = 2 5
+1-
I'd - T',
s = *\- + 1
0
Heat Exchanger
201
a. G r a v i t y - d i s c h a r g e T a n k , w i t h L e v e l C o n t r o l
oi
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _1
system b o u n d a r y /f
b. G r a v i t y - d i s c h a r g e T a n k , w i t h F l o w C o n t r o l
%---
-,<,p;
c. P u m p e d - d i s c h a r g e Tank, w i t h L e v e l C o n t r o l
Figure 2.
v.,
latory, S,,loops must be actuated b y previously undetermined hold-up variables. A maximum of V , other loops may
be added which are either external loops holding boundary
variables constant or internal loops actuated by previously
determined variables. The manipulable variables for all
iiiternal loops must exist before the rule is applied.
Distillation Columns
S
S
2
2
+2
+2
+2
35
+ 10
s
1
1
1
1
s
2
Xaterial balance
Energy balance
l\Iechanical energy balance-friction loXeciianical equilibrium
Thermal equilibrium
Phase equilibrium
Heat transfer rate-reboiler and condenser
Total
3-Y 10 - ( 2 s 6) = S 4
T, = 2 Lelels in reboiler and condenser are assumed to h a r e negligible effect on product
flow rates
cq
5.
+
TVd
=
=
s y s t e m boundary
condenser
I
I
I
reflux
t o p product
feed I
N compounds
negligible
heat loss
>
I
I
I
Figure 3.
203
system b o u n d a r y
Figure
4.
m-I-,
--r
~l I !
U
s y s t e m boundary
L---_/---
Figure
nize that the addition of the two control valves in the material balance loops increases V , by 2; (b) he concludes that the
reflux controller plus valve removes -4 degrees of freedom,
instead of zero. H e states that TRC-2 establishes a relationship between the feed composition and temperature (Ar - 1
degrees of freedom) and the inner loop FRC3 also removes
one degree of freedom.
Howard (1967) obtains AT degrees of freedom. He counts
the seven controllers as removing seven dynamic degrees of
freedom, in agreement with the present analysis, but does
not count the three extra degrees of freedom from the reflux
valve and the material balance valves. Allowing for the extra
degree of freedom counted before adding the valves aiid
controllers (from omitting the feedplate mechanical equilibrium condition), the net result is two degrees of freedom
less than the present analysis.
Conclusions
V
P_
Ynrk
~_.
l\j. Y
1964
. _
.
---Dison, D. C.Cheni. Eng. Sci. 2 5 , 337 (1970).
Forsyth, J. S.> IND.
EKG.CHEX, FCSDIM. 9, 307 (1970).
Gilliland, E. R., Reed, C. E., Znd. Eng. Chem. 34,551 (1942).
Hoffman. E. J.. Azeotrooic and Extractive Distillation.
pp 10-15, Interscience, Ke& York, N . Y., 1964.
Howard, G. AI., IKD.ENG.CHEY.,FCNDAM.
6, 86 (1967).
Kwauk, M., AI.Z.Ch.E.J . 2 , 240 (1936).
AIurrill, P. W., Hydrocarbon Process. 44, 143 (1963).
Smith, B. I)., Design of Equilibrium Stage Processes, p 84,
~
~~
From the above discussion, it is concluded that the following procedure can be used for determining the number of
degrees of freedom of a system, for both steady-state design
problems aiid control problems. (I) 1-iicontrolled system:
(a) steady-state degrees of freedom, V,, from eq 2 ; (b) dynamic degrees of freedom, Vd, from eq 4. ( 2 ) Effect of con-
RECEIVED
for review February 1, 1971
;ICCEPTI:D
November 27, 1971
by
I. Harold Silberberg
Texas Petroleum Research Committee, The Vniversity of Texas, Austin, Texas ?87lS
The acid treatment of an oil well to increase its productivity i s commonly practiced; however, at the present
time there i s nc proven method to guide the design of such a process. This research examines the ability of a
previously proposed model to predict the changes in a porous matrix when invaded by a slowly reactive
fluid which dissolves a portion of the solid. The model i s shcwn to predict a relationship between the increase
in porosity and the permeability which i s not precisely unique, as it depends to some extent on the initial pore
size distribution, but for the initial distributions tested the permeabilities were found to lie in a narrow band.
These results are independent of any parameters defining the kinetics except that the reaction be slow. It i s
shown experimentally that the reaction of ferric citrate in the presence of citric acid with porous bronze disks
satisfies the condition of being a slow reaction. The permeability change of the porous bronze disks i s found
to agree closely with the theoretical predictions.
205