Professional Documents
Culture Documents
In many situations, a straightforward and consistently applied maintenance strategy can have
results that attract positive attention as production and plant availability increase while
maintenance costs decrease. Such is the case at Monsantos Muscatine manufacturing
facility. The combination of technical solutions with corresponding work processes has had
measurable positive results and earned the facility the 2012 HART Plant of the Year Award.
The Monsanto Muscatine facility is located in southeast Iowa along the Mississippi River. It
manufactures Roundup herbicide along with acetanilide select chemistry products, including
Harness Xtra, Degree Xtra, and Warrant. The facility covers 150 acres and employs around
450 individuals to operate and manage eight individual process units. These include waste
treatment and plant utilities along with the product manufacturing process areas. The majority
of the plant operates continuously, year-round, and the oldest parts of the facility date back
50 years.
An inherited maintenance platform
The processing units are controlled by a mix of Emerson
DeltaV and Provox DCS (distributed control system)
platforms tied to more than 3,200 instrument assets,
including transmitters and control valve positioners. Of this
total installed base, there are currently over 600 HART and
125 Foundation fieldbus instruments within the facilities
AMS Intelligent Device Manager. The outstanding
instruments not yet in the AMS Intelligent Device Manager
are in large part either not terminated to smart I/O or are
simply non-smart devices. One of the pivotal changes in
Muscatines operation happened in 2006 when Joel Holmes,
site electrical reliability engineer, received a standalone
Emerson AMS unit from another Monsanto plant. Having
access to that unit enabled him to explore some of the
capabilities of a more sophisticated maintenance strategy
using diagnostic information gathered from field devices
using HART Communication and Foundation fieldbus
protocols.
Given the facilitys extensive population of maintenanceintensive valves and instrumentation, this was an area where
Holmes felt that improvements in reliability would have the
largest impact on overall plant performance. Part of the
process of integrating his new maintenance tools with the
work processes involved assigning a criticality value to the
instrument assets in each process unit. Those that could
impede production were given the highest priority for
monitoring.
As Holmes described the process, We utilize an A, B, or C
letter designation to denote asset criticality. The highest
criticality ranking is an A, with the lowest criticality ranking
being a C. Keep in mind, A-ranked critical devices will
receive the most attention since their
performance is crucial to the on-stream time
of the production system whereas C-ranked
devices may, in many cases, be allowed to
run till failure since their impact to the
production system is minimal or they have
in-line spares.
As Monsanto gained experience with AMS,
use within the plant became more
sophisticated with improvements in overall
effectiveness. The Alert Monitor became the primary predictive tool integrating the plants
asset criticality measure with the Device Manager. The respective device group assignment in
turn directly impacts its polling rate, or the frequency at which the Alert Monitor extracts the
devices status, health, and diagnostic information from the field.
Over time, Holmes created three groups of devices: transmitters, control valves, and vapor
sensors. This helped balance the loading of the Alert Monitor since having too many devices
poll at the same frequency overloaded the system, resulting in extremely slow update rates or
no response at all. Each device group has a set series of polling rate values dependent upon its
criticality ranking.
Working in a legacy environment
While some of the process units have relatively new control systems with HART-enabled
I/O, there are other areas where the system is still plain analog. These will be upgraded as the
plant moves through a series of migrations to DeltaV control systems with CHARMS I/O, but
in some areas that is still years away. The work-around that the plant has developed to gather
diagnostic information involves either WirelessHART THUM communication for critical
tags, or HART/Foundation fieldbus handheld communicators for devices that require less
frequent monitoring.
The WirelessHART deployment is growing with about 25 devices currently in operation.
Holmes expects that number to grow, and each process unit will soon have its own wireless
gateway.
A case in point
As the Glyphosate Technicals unit was
anticipating a scheduled shutdown for
catalyst regeneration, Holmes and his team
addressed a planned and scheduled
deficiency work order with a two-inch
eccentric ball control valve that had been identified as suspect through a prior control valve
reliability PM route. The AMS Intelligent Device Manager along with its ValveLink SnapOn application had measured increasing friction as the valve moved through its full span of
travel. This indicator suggested a problem was developing and triggered a failure when
performing the diagnostic scans on the control valve assembly. While the valve was not
exhibiting any issues that would be visible to the operators, the valve signature indicated that
the amount of force required to open and close the valve had increased substantially. It was
still able to perform its control function for
the moment, but comparisons with historical
signatures revealed that a more drastic
situation was developing.