Professional Documents
Culture Documents
09
Research in B r i e f
Feb. 09
Findings and conclusions of the research reported here are those of the
authors and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the
U.S. Department of Justice.
This research was supported by the National Institute of Justice (grant num
ber 2005IJCX0035), the National Institute of Mental Health (MH48165,
MH62669), and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (02913602).
Additional funding for this project was provided by the National Institute on
Drug Abuse, the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, and the
Iowa Agriculture and Home Economics Experiment Station (Project #3320).
NCJ 223509
ii
by some African-American
adolescents foster deviant,
anti-social attitudes (i.e., a
street code) and develop
mental pathways that are
related to violent behavior.
(See Synopsis of the Street
Code.)
This Research in Brief looks
at the results of research
into the validity of the code
of the street theory. The
authors reviewed two waves
of surveys with more than
800 African-American ado
lescents (ages 10 to 15) and
their primary caregivers
Sampling methodology
Characteristics of the Sample
This study is based on the first two waves of data from the Family and
Community Health Study (FACHS), a multisite investigation in Georgia
and Iowa of neighborhood and family effects on an individuals health
and development. FACHS was conducted by the Center for Family Re
search at the University of Georgia. The first wave, which was collected
in 1997, consisted of 867 African-American adolescents (400 boys and
467 girls; 462 in Iowa and 405 in Georgia) ages 10 to 13 years old and
their primary caregivers. In the second wave, which was collected in
1999, 738 of the adolescents (now ages 12 to 15) and their caregivers
were again surveyed. This represents a retention rate of 85 percent
from 1997 to 1999. Analyses indicated that the families who did not
participate in wave 2 did not differ significantly from those who partici
pated with regard to caregiver income and education or target childs
age, gender, school performance or delinquency. Complete data for the
variables used in this study were available for 720 families.
In Georgia, families were recruited from portions of the Atlanta met
ropolitan area, such as South Atlanta, East Atlanta, Southeast Atlanta
and Athens. In Iowa, all study participants resided in two metropolitan
urban communities: Waterloo and Des Moines.
Sampling Strategy
The sampling strategy for FACHS was designed to meet the studys
goal of investigating the effects of neighborhood characteristics on
the functioning of children and families. The families were recruited
from neighborhoods that varied as to demographic characteristics (i.e.,
percent African-American) and economic level (i.e., percent of families
with children living below the poverty line). The final sample of families
recruited involved participants who ranged from extremely poor to
middle class. The sampling strategy yielded a relatively representative
set of communities with sufficient variability in economic status to allow
detection of significant relations between community characteristics
and outcome variables.
In both Georgia and Iowa, families were drawn randomly from rosters
and contacted to determine their interest in participation. Of the families
on the rosters who could be located, interviews were completed with
72 percent of eligible Iowa families and just over 60 percent of eligible
Georgia families.
Compensation
Respondents were reimbursed for participating in the study. Primary
caregivers received $100 and target children received $70. The reim
bursement levels reflected the different amounts of time required of
each family member for participation.
Characteristics related
to adoption of the
street code
Neighborhood character
istics. Anderson argues that
the high rates of poverty,
joblessness, violence, racial
discrimination, alienation,
mistrust of police and hope
lessness that typify many dis
advantaged neighborhoods
have instilled anti-social
attitudes and values in some
residents. Although most
families who reside in dis
advantaged neighborhoods
are law abiding, everyone in
the neighborhood learns or
knows the rules of the street
code to be followed and pos
sible penalties for violating
these rules. Adolescents are
likely to be taught violent be
havior, to witness violent acts
and to have role models who
display high levels of aggres
sion and violence. As a result,
these youngsters present a
bravado or a sense of pride in
being tough, present a violent
identity and protect them
selves and their close friends
Measured by primary caregiver education level and family income. These two items were
standardized and summed to form a composite measure of family ses.
Family structure
a dichotomous variable denoting households in which there were two caregivers in the home
in comparison with single-caregiver homes (1=two-caregiver family, 0=one-caregiver family).
set as the aggregate number of children under the age of responsibility residing in the home
of the primary caregiver more than half of the time.
Target gender
Measured by three items adapted from the National Youth survey Family study (NYsFs),a
which asked respondents how many of their close friends had engaged in violent acts. The
responses to the items were summed to obtain a total score regarding the extent to which the
respondents friends engaged in violent behavior.b
school attachment
Measured by a 12-item scale that indicated the extent to which the respondents cared about
school and had positive feelings toward school. The items were summed to create an index of
school attachment.c
Measured by the summed total of affirmative responses to 15 events that may cause strain or
emotional discomfort, such as breaking up with a boyfriend or girlfriend or failing a class.d
Urban
a dichotomous variable indicating neighborhoods located in a city (=1) with nonurban neigh
borhoods (=0) as the reference group.
south
a dichotomous variable indicating neighborhoods located in the southern United states, i.e.,
Georgia (=1) with Midwestern, i.e., Iowa, neighborhoods (=0) as the reference group.
a
NYsFs follows a group of individuals originally surveyed in 1976 when they were between the ages of 11 and 17 years old
to look at their changing attitudes, beliefs and behaviors about topics such as career goals, involvement with community and
family, violence, drugs and social values. see elliott, d.s., d. huizinga, and s. Menard, Multiple Problem Youth: Delinquency,
Substance Use, and Mental Health Problems, New York: springer-Verlag, 1989. For other publications on the NYsFs, see http://
www.colorado.edu/ibs/NYsFs/currentresearchers/menardpublications.html.
b
10
It is important to show
others that you cannot
be intimidated.
s.D.
self-reported
Violent behaviort2
Controls
Family ses
12.57
4.14
-.05
.52
.50
-.03
.46
.50
.16a
Number of children
2.67
1.32
.06
Violent Peers
4.21
1.72
.23a
27.39
5.48
-.15a
strain
6.23
2.67
.04
Urban
.52
.48
.05
south
.49
.46
.08b
1.46
1.91
.45a
decent Family
19.87
3.47
-.15a
street Family
16.12
5.48
.03
21.76
6.64
.12a
11.56
4.37
.12a
-.03
1.00
.09b
17.22
3.61
.25a
2.18
3.29
school attachment
Discrimination
Racial discrimination
Neighborhood Characteristics
Neighborhood Violence
Neighborhood disadvantage
Dependent Variables
street codeT2
self-Reported Violent BehaviorT2
a
N=720
11
relating adoption of
the street code to
violent behavior
Descriptive statistics and
bivariate correlations for all
variables included in this study
are presented in exhibit 2. The
results show that neighbor
hood violence, neighborhood
disadvantage, experience
with racial discrimination and
adoption of the street code
are significantly related to
later reported violent behavior.
Furthermore, belonging to
decent families has a signifi
cant and negative association
with self-reported violence;
but surprisingly, belonging
to street families does not
at all appear to be related to
violent behavior reported two
years later.
Measures with significant
relationships to violent
behavior. Analyses were
performed to examine the
effects of neighborhood
context, family characteris
tics, racial discrimination and
street code adoption on later
violent behavior. The results
in exhibit 3 indicate that be
ing male, associating with
violent peers, having a his
tory of violent involvement,
experiencing discrimination,
living in a neighborhood
characterized by violence and
disadvantage, and adopting
12
s.D.
z-value
Family ses
.013
.081
.160
independent Variables
Controls
Family structure (1=two parents)
-.063
.052
-1.211
.237
.053
4.472a
Number of children
-.017
.019
-.895
Violent Peers
.189
.056
3.375a
school attachment
-.191
.055
-3.537a
strain
.021
.034
.618
Urban
.024
.028
.857
south
.042
.041
1.024
.467
.036
12.972a
decent Family
-.160
.053
-3.019a
street Family
-.034
.059
-.576
.102
.053
1.925b
Neighborhood Violence
.101
.052
1.942b
Neighborhood disadvantage
.092
.053
1.736b
street codeT2
.246
.052
4.731a
overdispersion parameter
-.545
.141
-3.865a
Family Characteristics
discrimination
Racial discrimination
Neighborhood Characteristics
Model X 2 (df)
Pseudo R
a
198.17(16)
.259
N=720
standardized coefficient weights are presented.
13
.25
.10
.10
.05
.00
-.05
-.10
.10
.09
-.03
-.16
-.15
-.20
nt
dece y
l
i
Fam
d
et
al
hood
rhoo
stre
Raci
n Neighbo nce eighbor age
y
l
o
i
i
t
a
e
N
t
l
n
Fam
i
n
o
i
V
rim
dva
disc
disa
et
stre
2
d
o
c eT
Street Code
Time 1
.47a
.27a
Street Code
Time 2
.25a
Self-Reported
Violent Behavior
.42a
.10b
Self-Reported
Violent Behavior
Notes: N = 720, X 2 = 2.61, p = .151, GFI = .99, aGFI= .98, RMsea = .042
coefficients are standardized.
Measurement error correlation is controlled.
The squared Multiple correlation was .27 for street codeT2 and .23 for self-Reported
Violent BehaviorT2
a
p < .01, bp < .05
16
Notes
1. See, e.g., Elliott, D.S., Serious
Violent Offenders: Onset, Devel
opmental Course, and Termina
tion The American Society of
Criminology 1993 Presidential
Address, Criminology, 32 (1) (Febru
ary 1994): 121; Farrington, D.P.,
Predictors, Causes, and Correlates
17
18
Additional reading
Baron, S.W., L.W. Kennedy,
and D.R. Forde. Male Street
Youths Conflict: The Role of
Background, Subcultural, and
Situational Factors. Justice
Quarterly 18 (2001): 759789.
Baumrind, D. The Influ
ence of Parenting Style on
Adolescent Competence and
Substance Use. Journal of
Early Adolescence 11 (1991):
5695.
Bellair, P.E. Social Interac
tion and Community Crime:
Examining the Importance of
Neighbor Networks. Crimi
nology 35 (1997): 677701.
Bellair, P.E., V.J. Roscigno,
and T.L. McNulty. Linking
Local Labor Market Oppor
tunity to Violent Adolescent
Delinquency. Journal of
Research in Crime and Delin
quency 40 (2003): 633.
Berkowitz, L. FrustrationAggression Hypothesis:
Examination and Reformula
tion. Psychological Bulletin
106 (1989): 5973.
Bernard, T.J. Angry Aggres
sion Among the Truly Disad
vantaged. Criminology 28
(1990): 7396.
Cao, L., A. Adams, and V.J.
Jensen. A Test of the Black
19
Washington, DC 20531
Official Business
Penalty for Private Use $300
*NCJ~223509
*
PRESORTED STANDARD
POSTAGE & FEES PAID
DOJ/NIJ
PERmIT NO. G91
FEB. 09
2/11/09 12:00:53 Pm