Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Introduction
Simultaneous mass and energy transport phenomena in vapour-liquid systems
are common in many operations of engineering interest such as condensation,
evaporation,
(binary)
systems
In this paper we
173
174
Vol. 3, No. 2
N~I
N~I
Ni'
i = ;,2,...n
(I)
The only assumptions required are that no surface reaction is occurring and
there are no constituent adsorptions at the interface.
a phase invariant.
(denoted by subscript
tangent
NYib
N.~
N~b ,
i = ],2,...n
(2)
N.I
Yi Nt'
(3)
i = 1,2 .... n
(4)
i = ],2 .... n
(5)
N.
i
xi N ,
t
The mole fractions Yi' xi are not all independent for we have
n
n
Yi = ];
~ x. = I
(6)
i=!
i=! i
From equations (3) - (6) we see that the n diffusion fluxes in either
phase are not all independent for we have
Vol. 3, No. 2
TRANSFER RATES
175
JY
l
0;
~ jx = 0
(7)
i
i=l
i=l
and therefore only n-I of the diffusion fluxes J. can be independent.
These
i
diffusion fluxes are not phase invariants and indeed in view of equations (4)
and (5), we see that due to the variation of the compositions
direction of transfer,
the interface value.
along the
at the
ends of the transfer path: at the interface and in the bulk, and the mass
transport coefficients,
it is possible to calculate
of dimension n-lxn-l,
Methods
for estimating
are discussed
in [1,2,3,4].
The bulk fluid compositions
balances along the flow path and are considered known in the present analysis.
Two problems still remain:
(i) determination
of the interfacial
state and
(ii) determination
Ey
Eb
Ex
leads to
(9)
In many
engineering operations we can neglect the terms in the normal energy flux
expressing
the rate of transfer of kinetic energy and the rate of doing work
stresses.
the invariant
to give a more
176
Vol. 3, No. 2
Thus we have
h (Ty
y
b - TI);
h~ (T I - T~)
(II)
T
and Tb,
x will be determined
by overall energy balances along the vapour-liquid contactor and are considered to be known for the purposes of the present analysis.
as the unknowns.
Alternatively,
It is
at the interface,
Xil ,
to be determined.
these equations
(4) and (5) may be combined to give for each of the n-I
independent species
J~ N
l
t
xi
Also, equation
j~
x
Yi
i = 1,2,...n-I
(12)
i=l
n
=
~ %-J~
i=l I I
i=l
n
+
1%iYiNt
i=I
n-I
~ (h i - % n ) J ~
i=I
~ %.J~
i=l I I
~ %ixiNt
i=I
n-1
I (% - % )J~
i
n 1
i=I
(13)
where we define
n
n
=
~ %iy i" ~
=
~ %.x.
(14)
y
i= 1
"
x
i=|xl
Equations (12) and (13) may be combined to give n~l independent relations
which will determine the interracial state:
Vol. 3, NO. 2
jx-
INTERFACIALMASSANDI~GYTRANSFERRATES
jy
n-1
~ (~k - ~n )Jy
k=l
qX - qy
xi - Yi
= Nt,
i = 1,2,...n-I
(15)
Y
Y
(15) we use the vapour phase diffusion fluxes.
In equations
177
Alternatively we
n-1
x
~ (%k - %n)Jk
k=l
qX _ qy
xi - Yi
= Nt,
~
X
Equations
(16)
acial parameters.
this
allows the calculation of the diffusive mass and heat fluxes from equations
(8) and (! ]).
energy fluxes.
Determination of Interfacial
We may combine n-1 of the equations (4) with equations (15) to give
n-1
N i = ( I - AiYi)J ~ - Yi ~
AkJ~ + Yi A, q%
i = 1,2 .... n-1
(17)
Y
where we have defined the parameters
Ak
Equation
(N)
(%k - In )/ ~y;
Aq
qX _ qy
[By] (jy)
(17')
(n-1 dimensional)
(y) A q
as
(18)
Y
where the matrix [By] which may be termed the bootstrap solution matrix has
the elements
B yik
6ik
Yi Ak'
(19)
(jx)
Thus
(x) &q
TX
Equation
Ni, i = 1,2,...n-I.
(20)
178
Vol. 3, No. 2
n-I
N.
~
i
i=l
and the total energy flux obtained from equation
N
(2])
(IO).
tal surfaces.
and energy transfer process in the vapour phase, Colburn and Drew derived an
expression for the total rate of condensation of the binary vapour mixture
(with components
and 2) as
1 Yli/Zl]
-
Nt
in
Y
(22)
Ylb/Zl
where k
i s t h e v a p o u r p h a s e b i n a r y mass t r a n s f e r
Y
the ratio of the rate of condensation of species
NI/N t
coefficient
and z I r e p r e s e n t s
i.e.
NI/(N l + N 2)
1 - z2
(23)
When a binary vapour mixture is just brought into contact with a cold
surface,
liquid condensate formed may be identified with this ratio zl, i.e.
Xll
zI
(24)
(23)
J lx
which
the
further
with
case.
other
Xil
condenser,
transfer
surface
mass
coefficient
in the
(24)
will
not
where
there
will
be a build-up
in the
involving
in the mixture
Ni/Nt
transfer
relation
coefficient
For processes
components
z.z
a vanishing
down t h e
and t h e mass
general
whilst
arise
For a vertical
prevailing
liquid
(25)
can only
phase.
(cf. equations
and ( 2 4 ) )
are
liquid
be v a i i d
phase
for
cannot
liquid
conditions
of condensed
vanish
condensation
o f some c o m p o n e n t s
evaporating,
relationships
in
s u c h as
(26)
will clearly not hold for it would mean negative interface liquid compositions
for the evaporating components.
VOI. 3, NO. 2
INTERFACIALMASSAND~qENGYTRANSFERRATF~
Multicomponent
179
Distillation
hold.
most text-
(27)
realized if
(27) will be
and
(ii) ~ k
In'
(i).
(29)
conductive heat fluxes in the liquid and vapour phases can only vanish if
these fluxes fortuitously
(28) to represent
(29) requires
species to be identical.
of the
compounds are close to one another but the differences will not be zero.
Typically we may expect the term A., defined in equation (17') to be of the
1
order of magnitude 0.1.; the sign of A. can be either positive or negative.
1
Let us examine the effect of such small differences in the latent heats on the
interfacial
rates of transfer.
N2
(I - YlAI )J~J
YlA2
J~z
Yl Aq/ ~
Y2 Aq/ ~
(30)
and
- YmAI
J~l
(I
- YmA2 ")J~
z
The diffusion fluxes J~ and J~ need not have the same magnitude
non-ideal
ternary mixtures.
It is quite possible
(31)
Y
for
we have
J~
5 J~
Further,
Yl A1
Equation
N1
(32)
Yl A2
+ 0.05
(33)
0.70 J~
(34)
i.e
180
Vol. 3, No. 2
In multicomponent
have the diffusion fluxes differ by a factor of five as assumed for the
purposes of illustration above.
in the matrix
(27).
Such effects are not present to such a dramatic extent for binary systems
because for this case we must necessarily have (cf. equation
(7))
in so many texts.
However,
transport characteristics
systems.
Nomenclature
[B]
he
gY
(]9)
3.
J.
k..
xlJ
Y
N.
Yi
Z
1
Greek Letters
6ik
Kronecker delta
H~l - ~XHi, differences in the partial molar enthalpies of the
Vol. 3, NO. 2
INTERFACIALMASSAND~%n~NGYTRANSFERRATES
181
(~i - ~ n ) / Y
Matrix Notation
( )
[ ]
Subscripts
b
species i
interfacial property
j,k
indices
Superscripts
x
References
I.
2.
W.E. Stewart and R. Prober, Ind. Eng. Chem. Fundamentals, !, 224 (1964)
3.
4.
5.
A.P. Colburn and T.B. Drew, Trans. Am. Inst. Chem. Ensrs., 33, 197 (]937)
6.
T.K. Sherwood, R.L. Pigford and C.R. Wilke, Mass Transfer, McGraw-Hill,
New York (1975)